Knowledge (XXG)

Industrial Development Consultants Ltd v Cooley

Source 📝

134:“I do not think it is necessary, but it appears to me very important, that we should concur in laying down again and again the general principle that in this court no agent in the course of his agency, in the matter of his agency, can be allowed to make any profit without the knowledge and consent of his principal; that that rule is an inflexible rule, and must be applied inexorably by this court, which is not entitled, in my judgment, to receive evidence, or suggestion, or argument as to whether the principal did or did not suffer any injury in fact by reason of the dealing of the agent; for the safety of mankind requires that no agent shall be able to put his principal to the danger of such an inquiry as that.” 31: 107:. Mr. Cooley was told that the gas board did not want to contract with a firm, but directly with him. Mr. Cooley then told the board of IDC Group that he was unwell and requested he be allowed to resign from his job on early notice. They acquiesced and accepted his resignation. He then undertook the Letchworth design work for the gas board on his own account. Industrial Development Consultants found out and sued him for breach of his duty of loyalty. 1365: 1379: 118:
held that even though there was no chance of IDC getting the contract, if they had been told they would not have released him. So he was held accountable for the benefits he received. He rejected the argument that because he made it clear in his discussions with the Gas Board that he was speaking in
119:
a private capacity, Mr. Cooley was under no fiduciary duty. He had ‘one capacity and one capacity only in which he was carrying on business at that time. That capacity was as managing director of the plaintiffs.’ All information which came to him should have been passed on.
90:
It is also applicable for fiduciary duty of an agent under agency law which states that an agent has a fiduciary relationship with his principal. This is a position which is similar to that of a trustee.
30: 1429: 1419: 1346: 1424: 138:
Throughout the last century, and also in the present century, courts of the highest authority have always strictly applied this rule.
772: 330: 229: 886: 755: 164: 99:
Mr Cooley was an architect employed as managing director of Industrial Development Consultants Ltd., part of IDC Group Ltd. The
1341: 688: 589: 127: 848: 482: 115: 201: 1008: 487: 1003: 978: 477: 1061: 856: 838: 507: 1231: 1018: 492: 1286: 1271: 1390: 983: 661: 472: 1111: 457: 156: 1266: 406: 323: 1081: 740: 594: 579: 557: 301: 281: 234: 224: 172: 1066: 988: 826: 569: 564: 517: 442: 436: 276: 194: 148: 100: 87:
case on the corporate opportunities doctrine, and the duty of loyalty from the law of trusts.
1071: 1038: 537: 401: 396: 361: 1320: 1293: 1281: 1261: 1195: 1190: 1173: 1153: 1148: 1128: 993: 973: 968: 871: 831: 542: 467: 391: 376: 296: 1397: 1205: 1123: 712: 678: 629: 614: 386: 291: 271: 261: 84: 1413: 1251: 1210: 1096: 1076: 1048: 998: 963: 937: 932: 925: 876: 816: 656: 646: 604: 527: 522: 452: 411: 335: 1383: 1133: 1101: 1056: 794: 789: 760: 673: 651: 619: 552: 532: 426: 366: 356: 308: 266: 244: 187: 1364: 1305: 1246: 1236: 1033: 1028: 866: 767: 683: 642: 609: 574: 497: 421: 371: 286: 1369: 1298: 1178: 1116: 861: 782: 777: 735: 717: 705: 666: 512: 502: 462: 447: 431: 381: 318: 313: 104: 1276: 1241: 1183: 1158: 1023: 920: 908: 893: 881: 809: 727: 700: 584: 1325: 1310: 1013: 898: 695: 239: 1215: 1163: 1143: 1091: 903: 821: 637: 599: 547: 1315: 1168: 913: 804: 799: 745: 416: 1256: 1200: 1106: 947: 750: 249: 72:
resigning director, conflict of interest, trusts, fiduciary duties
1138: 1086: 942: 340: 256: 183: 210: 179: 103:
had a lucrative project pending, to design a depot in
1334: 1224: 1047: 956: 847: 726: 628: 349: 217: 66: 58: 53: 45: 37: 23: 80:Industrial Development Consultants Ltd v Cooley 24:Industrial Development Consultants Ltd v Cooley 195: 8: 202: 188: 180: 29: 20: 1347:History of the American legal profession 7: 14: 331:Restitution and unjust enrichment 1378: 1377: 1363: 165:Regal (Hastings) Ltd v. Gulliver 1430:1972 in United Kingdom case law 1420:United Kingdom company case law 1342:History of the legal profession 1: 1425:High Court of Justice cases 1446: 1009:International legal theory 488:International slavery laws 483:International human rights 478:International criminal law 1357: 1062:Administration of justice 71: 28: 839:Basic structure doctrine 689:Natural and legal rights 570:Public international law 1019:Principle of typicality 493:International trade law 152:(1724) 2 Sel Cas Ch 61 136: 130:said, at p. 124: 126:(1874) 10 Ch.App. 96, 1014:Principle of legality 773:Delegated legislation 473:Intellectual property 132: 1232:Barristers' chambers 1174:Legal representation 1112:Justice of the peace 458:Financial regulation 157:Whelpdale v. Cookson 1267:Election commission 979:Expressive function 508:Landlord–tenant law 407:Consumer protection 122:Roskill J, quoted, 1225:Legal institutions 1092:Lawsuit/Litigation 1082:Dispute resolution 887:Catholic canon law 595:State of emergency 558:Will and testament 282:Law of obligations 235:Constitutional law 225:Administrative law 173:Boardman v. Phipps 160:(1747) 1 Ves Sen 9 124:Parker v. MacKenna 1407: 1406: 1067:Constitutionalism 989:Law and economics 827:Act of parliament 565:Product liability 518:Legal archaeology 443:Environmental law 437:Entertainment law 277:International law 149:Keech v. Sandford 101:Eastern Gas Board 76: 75: 1437: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1368: 1367: 1191:Question of fact 1072:Criminal justice 402:Construction law 397:Conflict of laws 362:Agricultural law 204: 197: 190: 181: 54:Court membership 33: 21: 16:1972 UK law case 1445: 1444: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1403: 1376: 1362: 1353: 1330: 1321:Political party 1294:Legal education 1282:Law enforcement 1262:Court of equity 1220: 1196:Question of law 1149:Practice of law 1129:Judicial review 1043: 994:Legal formalism 974:Comparative law 969:Contract theory 952: 872:Legal pluralism 843: 832:Act of Congress 756:Executive order 722: 624: 543:Nationality law 468:Immigration law 392:Competition law 345: 213: 208: 144: 113: 97: 83:1 WLR 443 is a 17: 12: 11: 5: 1443: 1441: 1433: 1432: 1427: 1422: 1412: 1411: 1405: 1404: 1402: 1401: 1394: 1387: 1373: 1370:Law portal 1358: 1355: 1354: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1338: 1336: 1332: 1331: 1329: 1328: 1323: 1318: 1313: 1308: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1279: 1274: 1269: 1264: 1259: 1254: 1249: 1244: 1239: 1234: 1228: 1226: 1222: 1221: 1219: 1218: 1213: 1208: 1206:Trial advocacy 1203: 1198: 1193: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1181: 1176: 1171: 1166: 1161: 1156: 1146: 1141: 1136: 1131: 1126: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1114: 1104: 1099: 1094: 1089: 1084: 1079: 1074: 1069: 1064: 1059: 1053: 1051: 1045: 1044: 1042: 1041: 1036: 1031: 1026: 1021: 1016: 1011: 1006: 1001: 996: 991: 986: 981: 976: 971: 966: 960: 958: 954: 953: 951: 950: 945: 940: 935: 930: 929: 928: 918: 917: 916: 911: 906: 901: 896: 891: 890: 889: 874: 869: 864: 859: 853: 851: 845: 844: 842: 841: 836: 835: 834: 829: 824: 814: 813: 812: 802: 797: 792: 787: 786: 785: 780: 775: 765: 764: 763: 758: 753: 743: 738: 736:Ballot measure 732: 730: 724: 723: 721: 720: 715: 713:Legal treatise 710: 709: 708: 703: 693: 692: 691: 681: 679:Letters patent 676: 671: 670: 669: 659: 654: 649: 640: 634: 632: 630:Sources of law 626: 625: 623: 622: 617: 615:Unenforced law 612: 607: 602: 597: 592: 587: 582: 577: 572: 567: 562: 561: 560: 555: 545: 540: 535: 530: 525: 520: 515: 510: 505: 500: 495: 490: 485: 480: 475: 470: 465: 460: 455: 450: 445: 440: 434: 429: 424: 419: 414: 409: 404: 399: 394: 389: 387:Commercial law 384: 379: 374: 369: 364: 359: 353: 351: 347: 346: 344: 343: 338: 333: 328: 327: 326: 316: 311: 306: 305: 304: 299: 289: 284: 279: 274: 269: 264: 259: 254: 253: 252: 242: 237: 232: 227: 221: 219: 215: 214: 209: 207: 206: 199: 192: 184: 178: 177: 169: 161: 153: 143: 140: 112: 109: 96: 93: 85:UK company law 74: 73: 69: 68: 64: 63: 60: 56: 55: 51: 50: 47: 43: 42: 39: 35: 34: 26: 25: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1442: 1431: 1428: 1426: 1423: 1421: 1418: 1417: 1415: 1400: 1399: 1395: 1393: 1392: 1388: 1386: 1385: 1374: 1372: 1371: 1366: 1360: 1359: 1356: 1348: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1340: 1339: 1337: 1333: 1327: 1324: 1322: 1319: 1317: 1314: 1312: 1309: 1307: 1304: 1300: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1292: 1288: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1280: 1278: 1275: 1273: 1270: 1268: 1265: 1263: 1260: 1258: 1255: 1253: 1252:Civil society 1250: 1248: 1245: 1243: 1240: 1238: 1235: 1233: 1230: 1229: 1227: 1223: 1217: 1214: 1212: 1211:Trier of fact 1209: 1207: 1204: 1202: 1199: 1197: 1194: 1192: 1189: 1185: 1182: 1180: 1177: 1175: 1172: 1170: 1167: 1165: 1162: 1160: 1157: 1155: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1147: 1145: 1142: 1140: 1137: 1135: 1132: 1130: 1127: 1125: 1122: 1118: 1115: 1113: 1110: 1109: 1108: 1105: 1103: 1100: 1098: 1097:Legal opinion 1095: 1093: 1090: 1088: 1085: 1083: 1080: 1078: 1077:Court-martial 1075: 1073: 1070: 1068: 1065: 1063: 1060: 1058: 1055: 1054: 1052: 1050: 1049:Jurisprudence 1046: 1040: 1037: 1035: 1032: 1030: 1027: 1025: 1022: 1020: 1017: 1015: 1012: 1010: 1007: 1005: 1002: 1000: 997: 995: 992: 990: 987: 985: 982: 980: 977: 975: 972: 970: 967: 965: 962: 961: 959: 955: 949: 946: 944: 941: 939: 938:Statutory law 936: 934: 933:Socialist law 931: 927: 926:Byzantine law 924: 923: 922: 919: 915: 912: 910: 907: 905: 902: 900: 897: 895: 892: 888: 885: 884: 883: 880: 879: 878: 877:Religious law 875: 873: 870: 868: 865: 863: 860: 858: 855: 854: 852: 850: 849:Legal systems 846: 840: 837: 833: 830: 828: 825: 823: 820: 819: 818: 817:Statutory law 815: 811: 808: 807: 806: 803: 801: 798: 796: 793: 791: 788: 784: 781: 779: 776: 774: 771: 770: 769: 766: 762: 759: 757: 754: 752: 749: 748: 747: 744: 742: 739: 737: 734: 733: 731: 729: 725: 719: 716: 714: 711: 707: 704: 702: 699: 698: 697: 694: 690: 687: 686: 685: 682: 680: 677: 675: 672: 668: 665: 664: 663: 660: 658: 655: 653: 650: 648: 647:Statutory law 644: 641: 639: 636: 635: 633: 631: 627: 621: 618: 616: 613: 611: 608: 606: 605:Transport law 603: 601: 598: 596: 593: 591: 588: 586: 583: 581: 578: 576: 573: 571: 568: 566: 563: 559: 556: 554: 551: 550: 549: 546: 544: 541: 539: 536: 534: 531: 529: 526: 524: 523:Legal fiction 521: 519: 516: 514: 511: 509: 506: 504: 501: 499: 496: 494: 491: 489: 486: 484: 481: 479: 476: 474: 471: 469: 466: 464: 461: 459: 456: 454: 453:Financial law 451: 449: 446: 444: 441: 438: 435: 433: 430: 428: 425: 423: 420: 418: 415: 413: 412:Corporate law 410: 408: 405: 403: 400: 398: 395: 393: 390: 388: 385: 383: 380: 378: 375: 373: 370: 368: 365: 363: 360: 358: 355: 354: 352: 348: 342: 339: 337: 336:Statutory law 334: 332: 329: 325: 322: 321: 320: 317: 315: 312: 310: 307: 303: 300: 298: 295: 294: 293: 290: 288: 285: 283: 280: 278: 275: 273: 270: 268: 265: 263: 260: 258: 255: 251: 248: 247: 246: 243: 241: 238: 236: 233: 231: 228: 226: 223: 222: 220: 218:Core subjects 216: 212: 205: 200: 198: 193: 191: 186: 185: 182: 175: 174: 170: 167: 166: 162: 159: 158: 154: 151: 150: 146: 145: 141: 139: 135: 131: 129: 125: 120: 117: 110: 108: 106: 102: 94: 92: 88: 86: 82: 81: 70: 65: 61: 59:Judge sitting 57: 52: 48: 44: 40: 36: 32: 27: 22: 19: 1396: 1389: 1375: 1361: 1134:Jurisdiction 1102:Legal remedy 1057:Adjudication 957:Legal theory 795:Ratification 790:Promulgation 761:Proclamation 741:Codification 674:Human rights 662:Divine right 652:Constitution 620:Women in law 538:Military law 533:Marriage law 528:Maritime law 427:Election law 367:Aviation law 357:Abortion law 309:Property law 245:Criminal law 171: 163: 155: 147: 137: 133: 123: 121: 114: 98: 89: 79: 78: 77: 18: 1306:Legislature 1237:Bureaucracy 1034:Rule of man 1029:Rule of law 1004:Libertarian 867:Chinese law 768:Legislation 718:Regulations 706:Law reports 684:Natural law 580:Reparations 575:Refugee law 498:Jurimetrics 439:(Media law) 377:Banking law 372:Amnesty law 350:Disciplines 287:Private law 1414:Categories 1299:Law school 1179:Prosecutor 1117:Magistrate 904:Jewish law 862:Common law 783:Rulemaking 778:Regulation 728:Law making 667:Divine law 643:Legal code 590:Sports law 513:Law of war 463:Health law 448:Family law 432:Energy law 382:Bankruptcy 319:Punishment 314:Public law 128:James L.J. 116:Roskill J. 105:Letchworth 41:High Court 1277:Judiciary 1272:Executive 1247:The bench 1184:Solicitor 1159:Barrister 1039:Sociology 1024:Pseudolaw 964:Anarchist 921:Roman law 909:Parsi law 894:Hindu law 882:Canon law 857:Civil law 810:Concordat 701:Precedent 610:Trust law 585:Space law 422:Drugs law 292:Procedure 230:Civil law 168:2 AC 134n 62:Roskill J 49:1 WLR 443 1384:Category 1326:Tribunal 1311:Military 1154:Attorney 1124:Judgment 984:Feminist 899:Jain law 696:Case law 417:Cyberlaw 324:Corporal 302:Criminal 272:Evidence 262:Doctrine 240:Contract 142:See also 111:Judgment 67:Keywords 46:Citation 1398:Outline 1335:History 1242:The bar 1216:Verdict 1164:Counsel 1144:Justice 999:History 822:Statute 638:Charter 600:Tax law 548:Probate 176:2 AC 46 1316:Police 1287:Agency 1169:Lawyer 914:Sharia 805:Treaty 800:Repeal 746:Decree 657:Custom 553:Estate 503:Labour 267:Equity 1391:Index 1257:Court 1201:Trial 1107:Judge 948:Yassa 751:Edict 297:Civil 250:Crime 95:Facts 38:Court 1139:Jury 1087:Fiqh 943:Xeer 341:Tort 257:Deed 211:Law 1416:: 645:/ 203:e 196:t 189:v

Index


UK company law
Eastern Gas Board
Letchworth
Roskill J.
James L.J.
Keech v. Sandford
Whelpdale v. Cookson
Regal (Hastings) Ltd v. Gulliver
Boardman v. Phipps
v
t
e
Law
Administrative law
Civil law
Constitutional law
Contract
Criminal law
Crime
Deed
Doctrine
Equity
Evidence
International law
Law of obligations
Private law
Procedure
Civil
Criminal

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑