Knowledge

Interactions of actors theory

Source 📝

820:
relative motion of B as seen from A. The knots correspond to the beginning of the experiment then the start and finish of the A/B interaction. Referring to the three intervals, where x, y, z, are the separation distances of the knots from the bar and each other, he noted x > y > z on the string for participant A does not imply x > z for participant B on the elastic. A change of separation between A and B producing
122:. Pask sought to apply the axiomatic properties of agreement or epistemological dependence to produce a "sharp-valued" social science with precision comparable to the results of the hard sciences. It was out of this inclination that he would develop his interactions of actors theory. Pask's concepts produce relations in all media and he regarded IA as a 137:. He proved that no two concepts or products could be the same because of their different histories. He called this the "No Doppelgangers" clause or edict. Later he reflected "Time is incommensurable for Actors". He saw these properties as necessary to produce differentiation and innovation or new coherences in physical nature and, indeed, minds. 32:: The chief distinction being that conversation theory focuses on analysing the specific features that allow a conversation to emerge between two participants, whereas interaction of actor's theory focuses on the broader domain of conversation in which conversations may appear, disappear, and reappear over time. 153:
respectability (observability), responsibility (able to respond to stimulus), unity (not uniformity) were necessary properties to produce agreement (or dependence) and agreement-to-disagree (or relative independence) when Actors interact. Concepts could be applied imperatively or permissively when a Petri (see
210:
Pask, the "philosopher mechanic", produced a tool kit to analyse the basis for knowledge and criticise the teaching and application of knowledge from all fields: the law, social and system sciences to mathematics, physics and biology. In establishing the vacuity of invariance Pask was challenged with
913:
must exert repulsive forces. This is not yet accepted by Spencer Brown and others. Without a repulsion, or Newtonian reaction at the boundary, sets, their members or interacting participants would diffuse away forming a "smudge"; Hilbertian marks on paper would not be preserved. Pask, the mechanical
638:(in duration). On the other hand actor interaction time is vectorial with components that are incommensurable. In the general case there is no well-defined beginning and interaction goes on indefinitely. As a result the time vector has incommensurable components. Both the quantity and quality differ. 819:
Pask attached a piece of string to a bar with three knots in it. Then he attached a piece of elastic to the bar with three knots in it. One observing actor, A, on the string would see the knotted intervals on the other actor as varying as the elastic was stretched and relaxed corresponding to the
193:
of A and B. The A, B differences are generalizations about a coalescence of concepts on the part of A and B; their commonality and coherence is the similarity. The difference (reiterated) is the differentiation of A and B (their agreements to disagree, their incoherences). Truth value in this case
140:
In 1995, Pask stated what he called his Last Theorem: "Like concepts repel and unlike concepts attract". For ease of application Pask stated the differences and similarities of descriptions (the products of processes) were context and perspective dependent. In the last three years of his life Pask
184:
Interaction of actors has no specific beginning or end. It goes on forever. Since it does so it has very peculiar properties. Whereas a conversation is mapped (due to a possibility of obtaining a vague kinematic, perhaps picture-frame image, of it, onto Newtonian time, precisely because it has a
164:
In sum, IA supports the earlier kinematic conversation theory work where minimally two concurrent concepts were required to produce a non-trivial third. One distinction separated the similarity and difference of any pair in the minimum triple. However, his formal methods denied the competence of
148:
which described minimal persisting concepts. He interpreted these as acting as computing elements which exert repulsive forces to interact and persist in filling the space. The knots, links and braids of his entailment mesh models of concepts, which could include tangle-like processes seeking
917:
Some followers of Pask emphasise his late work, done in the closing chapter of his life, which is neither as clear nor as grounded as the prior decades of research and machine- and theory-building. This tends to skew the impression gleaned by researchers as to Pask's contribution or even his
152:
His analysis proceeded with like seeming concepts repelling or unfolding but after a sufficient duration of interaction (he called this duration "faith") a pair of similar or like-seeming concepts will always produce a difference and thus an attraction. Amity (availability for interaction),
218:
Pask held that concurrence is a necessary condition for modelling brain functions and he remarked IA was meant to stand AI, Artificial Intelligence, on its head. Pask believed it was the job of cybernetics to compare and contrast. His IA theory showed how to do this.
662:: Your concept of your concept is not my concept of your concept—a reproduced concept is not the same as the original concept. Pask defined concepts as persisting, countably infinite, recursively packed spin processes (like many cored cable, or skins of an onion) in 169:'s "Point of Calm"). He dismissed the digital computer as a kind of kinematic "magic lantern". He saw mechanical models as the future for the concurrent kinetic computers required to describe natural processes. He believed that this implied the need to extend 95: 236:. In Pask's true field concurrent theory kinetic processes can interrupt (or, indeed, interact with) each other, simply reproducing or producing a new resultant force within a coherence (of concepts) but without buffering delays or priority. 231:
The Hewitt, Bishop and Steiger approach concerns sequential processing and inter-process communication in digital, serial, kinematic computers. It is a parallel or pseudo-concurrent theory as is the theory of concurrency. See
185:
beginning and end), an interaction, in general, cannot be treated in this manner. Kinematics are inadequate to deal with life: we need kinetics. Even so as in the minimal case of a strict conversation we cannot construct the
161: : "operations generating thoughts and penetrating conceptual boundaries within participants, excite the concepts bounded as oscillators, which, in ridding themselves of this surplus excitation, produce radiation" 898:
approach where a set membership criterion of similarity also permitted differences amongst set or coherence members, but he insisted repulsive force was exerted at set and members' coherence boundaries. He said of
268:. It states no two products of concurrent interaction can be the same because of their different dynamic contexts and perspectives. No Doppelgangers is necessary to account for the production by interaction and 77:
The figure shows Pask's "repulsive carapace" force surrounding a concept. It is shown by the minus sign, it has a clockwise or anticlockwise spin – compare Spin. The spin signature is determined by the residual
202:
It is essential to postulate vectorial times (where components of the vectors are incommensurate) and furthermore times which interact with each other in the manner of Louis Kaufmann's knots and tangles.
66:, as the manuscript is entitled, is essentially a concurrent spin calculus applied to the living environment with strict topological constraints. One of the most notable associates of Gordon Pask, 102:
of a minimal concept. The red, blue and green rods exert compressive repulsions, the black lines represent attractive tensions. The Borromean link shown is regarded as a resonance form (c.f.
82:
of a braid which is the thick line enclosed by the cylinder. The plus sign labels a process seeking closure by "eating its own tail". Three of these toroidal structures can produce a
165:
mathematics or digital serial and parallel processes to produce applicable descriptions because of their innate pathologies in locating the infinitesimals of dynamic equilibria (
859:(T) where => means produces and Ap means the "application of", D means "description of" and Z is the concept mesh or coherence of which T is part. This can also be written 505: 483: 458: 436: 414: 392: 370: 348: 326: 304: 157:) condition for synchronous transfer of meaningful information occurred. Extending his physical analogy Pask associated the interactions of thought generation with 260:
due to Pask in support of his theories of learning and interaction in all media: conversation theory and interactions of actors theory. It accounts for physical
51:(see "Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity" 1980). Pask's nexus of analogy, dependence and mechanical spin produces the differences that are central to 934:
Scott, B (2009). Conversations, Individuals and Concepts: Some key concepts in Gordon Pask's Interaction of Actors and Conversation Theories.
875:
Pask distinguishes Imperative (written &Ap or IM) from Permissive Application (written Ap) where information is transferred in the
74: 215:. "Ah", he said "the atomic hypothesis". He rejected this instead preferring the infinite nature of the productions of waves. 635: 233: 722:(required for the production of the quanta of thought: the transfer of "set-theoretic tokens", as Pask puts it in 1996). 828:
for A and B, would account for this for example. On occasion a second knotted string was tied to the bar representing
1133: 895: 845: 634:
Conversation is defined as having a beginning and an end and time is vectorial. The components of the vector are
265: 134: 127: 130:
he stated "Processes produce products and all products (finite, bounded coherences) are produced by processes".
174: 646:'s kinematic domain (bounded by beginnings and ends) where times are commensurable and in the eternal kinetic 841: 848:: "All processes produce products and all products are produced by processes". This can be written: 276:) of different, evolving, persisting and coherent forms. Two proofs are presented both due to Pask. 58:
While working with clients in the last years of his life, Pask produced an axiomatic scheme for his
643: 29: 488: 466: 441: 419: 397: 375: 353: 331: 309: 287: 220: 145: 666:
medium (stars, liquids, gases, solids, machines and, of course, brains) that produce relations.
40:
Interactions of actors theory was developed late in Pask's career. It is reminiscent of Freud's
1039:
Heinz von Foerster's Self-Organisation, the Progenitor of Conversation and Interaction Theories
170: 111: 914:
philosopher, wanted to apply these ideas to bring a new kind of rigour to cybernetic models.
900: 891: 273: 79: 829: 269: 261: 67: 45: 25: 507:
be the start and finish times for the transfer of meaningful information, we can write:
948: 808:
AA = A(A) is not equal to BA = B(A) and vice versa, hence, there are no Doppelgangers.
719: 123: 119: 83: 41: 94: 1127: 821: 212: 166: 910: 905: 880: 207: 952: 114:
nature of his work, Pask would make analogies to physical theories in the classic
825: 257: 186: 142: 103: 52: 48: 21: 659: 115: 110:
Interactions of actors theory is a process theory. As a means to describe the
87: 223:
called him a genius, "Mr. Cybernetics", the "cybernetician's cybernetician".
70:, was a key contributor to the development of interactions of actors theory. 876: 158: 154: 99: 890:
was a condition he required for the persistence of concepts. He endorsed
245: 190: 625: 253: 964: 249: 93: 73: 72: 90:
could be used as a model for the interaction in a Borromean link.
824:
during interaction, recoil or the differences in relativistic
879:
manner, the token appearing as a hole in a torus producing a
86:
model of the minimal stable concept. Pask said the prismatic
194:
meaning the coherence between all of the interacting actors.
951:
and the inadequacy of serial (digital computer) modelling
173:
to emulate true field concurrency rather than the current
785:
AB = A(B) = <Con A(B), D A(B)>, A's Concept of B.
780:
AA = A(A) = <Con A(A), D A(A)>, A's Concept of A,
977: 492: 470: 445: 423: 401: 379: 357: 335: 313: 291: 976:
Aspects of these structures can be investigated with
491: 469: 444: 422: 400: 378: 356: 334: 312: 290: 1009:
Interactions of Actors, Theory and Some Applications
64:
Interactions of Actors, Theory and Some Applications
887: 647: 499: 477: 452: 430: 408: 386: 364: 342: 320: 298: 149:"tail-eating" closure, Pask called "tapestries". 840:To set in further context Pask won a prize from 284:Consider a pair of moving, dynamic participants 62:, less well-known than his conversation theory. 753:) = <Con B(T), D B(T)>, B's Concept of T, 737:) = <Con A(T), D A(T)>, A's Concept of T, 244:"There are no Doppelgangers" is a fundamental 106:) of Pask's minimal persisting concept triple. 797:given that for all Z and all T, the concepts 8: 1033: 1031: 1029: 1027: 1025: 1019:Pask (1996) p.355 and Postulate (20) p. 359 28:. It is a generalisation of Pask's earlier 1003: 1001: 999: 997: 995: 1059:von Foerster pp 35–42 in Glanville (1993) 490: 468: 443: 421: 399: 377: 355: 333: 311: 289: 883:containing recursively packed concepts. 658:The second proof is more reminiscent of 650:domain where times are incommensurable. 967:. At cybsoc.org. Retrieved 1 July 2008. 927: 416:will be different from the duration of 954:Retrieved 9 June 2008 at cybsys.co.uk 789:and vice versa, or, in general terms 642:No Doppelgangers applies in both the 7: 350:. Their separation will vary during 801:TA = A(T) is not equal to TB = B(T) 691:means "description of" and <Con 133:Most importantly Pask also had his 98:Prismatic tensegrity space filling 793:ZZ = Z(Z) = <Con Z(Z), D Z>, 14: 1104:Green, Nick. "On Gordon Pask." 1077:Pask (1993) para 82 and Table 4 947:Short discussion in context of 938:. 4(3): 151-158 (pp. 155-156). 772:) = <Con Z (T), D Z(T)>, 1: 886:Pask's "hard" or "repulsive" 60:interactions of actors theory 18:Interactions of actors theory 989:Pask (1993) fig.35 para. 219 714:produces A's description of 500:{\displaystyle \textstyle T} 478:{\displaystyle \textstyle T} 453:{\displaystyle \textstyle B} 431:{\displaystyle \textstyle T} 409:{\displaystyle \textstyle A} 387:{\displaystyle \textstyle T} 365:{\displaystyle \textstyle T} 343:{\displaystyle \textstyle T} 321:{\displaystyle \textstyle B} 299:{\displaystyle \textstyle A} 710:)> reads A's concept of 226: 1150: 936:Constructivist Foundations 141:presented models based on 896:coherence theory of truth 846:complementarity principle 328:producing an interaction 128:complementarity principle 20:is a theory developed by 1068:Pask 1993 paras 100, 130 1050:Pask 1993, paragraph 84. 175:von Neumann architecture 1108:30.5/6 (2001): 673-682. 842:Old Dominion University 16:In information theory, 648:interactions of actors 640: 501: 479: 454: 432: 410: 388: 366: 344: 322: 300: 204: 196: 180:Reviewing IA he said: 107: 91: 632: 502: 480: 455: 433: 411: 389: 367: 345: 323: 301: 200: 182: 97: 76: 1117:Pask (1993) para 188 1086:Pask (1993) para 102 1037:Gordon Pask (1996). 1007:Gordon Pask (1993), 489: 467: 442: 420: 398: 376: 354: 332: 310: 288: 227:Hewitt's actor model 978:Scharein's KnotPlot 963:Nick Green (2003). 644:conversation theory 266:exclusion principle 135:exclusion principle 118:enterprises of the 30:conversation theory 1134:Information theory 815:A mechanical model 654:Reproduction proof 497: 496: 475: 474: 450: 449: 428: 427: 406: 405: 384: 383: 372:. The duration of 362: 361: 340: 339: 318: 317: 296: 295: 221:Heinz von Foerster 211:the invariance of 108: 92: 1095:R.D. Laing (1970) 776:also, in general 611: 610: 171:quantum computing 112:interdisciplinary 1141: 1118: 1115: 1109: 1102: 1096: 1093: 1087: 1084: 1078: 1075: 1069: 1066: 1060: 1057: 1051: 1048: 1042: 1035: 1020: 1017: 1011: 1005: 990: 987: 981: 974: 968: 961: 955: 945: 939: 932: 901:G. Spencer Brown 892:Nicholas Rescher 510: 509: 506: 504: 503: 498: 484: 482: 481: 476: 459: 457: 456: 451: 437: 435: 434: 429: 415: 413: 412: 407: 393: 391: 390: 385: 371: 369: 368: 363: 349: 347: 346: 341: 327: 325: 324: 319: 305: 303: 302: 297: 240:No Doppelgangers 206:In experimental 1149: 1148: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1116: 1112: 1103: 1099: 1094: 1090: 1085: 1081: 1076: 1072: 1067: 1063: 1058: 1054: 1049: 1045: 1036: 1023: 1018: 1014: 1006: 993: 988: 984: 975: 971: 962: 958: 946: 942: 933: 929: 924: 870: 866: 858: 854: 838: 836:Further context 830:coordinate time 817: 757:or, in general 656: 630:Pask remarked: 487: 486: 465: 464: 440: 439: 418: 417: 396: 395: 374: 373: 352: 351: 330: 329: 308: 307: 286: 285: 282: 270:intermodulation 262:differentiation 242: 229: 120:social sciences 68:Gerard de Zeeuw 38: 26:Gerard de Zeeuw 12: 11: 5: 1147: 1145: 1137: 1136: 1126: 1125: 1120: 1119: 1110: 1097: 1088: 1079: 1070: 1061: 1052: 1043: 1021: 1012: 991: 982: 969: 956: 949:upper ontology 940: 926: 925: 923: 920: 873: 872: 868: 864: 856: 852: 837: 834: 822:Doppler shifts 816: 813: 803: 802: 795: 794: 787: 786: 782: 781: 774: 773: 755: 754: 739: 738: 720:Dirac notation 677:) ≠  669:Here we prove 655: 652: 609: 608: 561: 495: 473: 448: 438:observed from 426: 404: 394:observed from 382: 360: 338: 316: 294: 281: 280:Duration proof 278: 264:and is Pask's 241: 238: 228: 225: 189:, metaphor or 124:process theory 84:Borromean link 42:psychodynamics 37: 34: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1146: 1135: 1132: 1131: 1129: 1114: 1111: 1107: 1101: 1098: 1092: 1089: 1083: 1080: 1074: 1071: 1065: 1062: 1056: 1053: 1047: 1044: 1040: 1034: 1032: 1030: 1028: 1026: 1022: 1016: 1013: 1010: 1004: 1002: 1000: 998: 996: 992: 986: 983: 979: 973: 970: 966: 960: 957: 953: 950: 944: 941: 937: 931: 928: 921: 919: 915: 912: 908: 907: 902: 897: 893: 889: 884: 882: 878: 862: 861: 860: 849: 847: 843: 835: 833: 831: 827: 823: 814: 812: 809: 806: 800: 799: 798: 792: 791: 790: 784: 783: 779: 778: 777: 771: 767: 763: 760: 759: 758: 752: 748: 744: 741: 740: 736: 732: 728: 725: 724: 723: 721: 717: 713: 709: 705: 702: 698: 694: 690: 686: 684: 680: 676: 672: 667: 665: 661: 653: 651: 649: 645: 639: 637: 636:commensurable 631: 628: 627: 623: 622: 618: 614: 607: 606: 603: 599: 596: 592: 591: 588: 584: 581: 577: 576: 573: 569: 566: 562: 560: 558: 555: 551: 548: 544: 542: 539: 535: 532: 528: 526: 523: 519: 516: 512: 511: 508: 493: 471: 461: 446: 424: 402: 380: 358: 336: 314: 292: 279: 277: 275: 271: 267: 263: 259: 255: 251: 247: 239: 237: 235: 224: 222: 216: 214: 213:atomic number 209: 203: 199: 195: 192: 188: 181: 178: 176: 172: 168: 167:Stafford Beer 162: 160: 156: 150: 147: 144: 138: 136: 131: 129: 125: 121: 117: 113: 105: 101: 96: 89: 85: 81: 75: 71: 69: 65: 61: 56: 54: 50: 47: 43: 35: 33: 31: 27: 23: 19: 1113: 1105: 1100: 1091: 1082: 1073: 1064: 1055: 1046: 1038: 1015: 1008: 985: 972: 959: 943: 935: 930: 916: 911:distinctions 906:Laws of Form 904: 885: 881:Klein bottle 874: 855:(T)) => D 850: 839: 818: 810: 807: 804: 796: 788: 775: 769: 765: 761: 756: 750: 746: 742: 734: 730: 726: 715: 711: 707: 703: 700: 696: 692: 688: 687: 682: 678: 674: 670: 668: 663: 657: 641: 633: 629: 624: 620: 616: 615: 612: 604: 601: 597: 594: 593: 589: 586: 582: 579: 578: 574: 571: 567: 564: 563: 556: 553: 549: 546: 545: 540: 537: 533: 530: 529: 524: 521: 517: 514: 513: 462: 283: 243: 230: 217: 208:Epistemology 205: 201: 197: 183: 179: 163: 151: 139: 132: 109: 63: 59: 57: 39: 17: 15: 965:Gordon Pask 826:proper time 258:cybernetics 234:Concurrency 187:truth value 143:Knot theory 104:tautomerism 53:cybernetics 49:panpsychism 22:Gordon Pask 1106:Kybernetes 922:References 918:lucidity. 863:<Ap(Con 718:, evoking 660:R.D. Laing 198:He added: 116:positivist 88:tensegrity 980:software. 877:Petri net 805:and that 159:radiation 155:Petri net 126:. In his 100:unit cell 46:Bateson's 1128:Category 888:carapace 871:(T)>. 844:for his 36:Overview 867:(T)), D 811:Q.E.D. 246:theorem 191:analogy 851:Ap(Con 626:Q.E.D. 272:(c.f. 254:clause 80:parity 909:that 613:Thus 274:beats 250:edict 146:knots 485:and 463:Let 306:and 24:and 903:'s 894:'s 699:), 685:). 664:any 256:of 252:or 1130:: 1024:^ 994:^ 832:. 764:= 762:TZ 745:= 743:TB 729:= 727:TA 619:≠ 600:≠ 585:≠ 570:≠ 559:, 552:≠ 543:, 536:≠ 527:, 520:≠ 460:. 248:, 177:. 55:. 44:, 1041:. 869:Z 865:Z 857:Z 853:Z 770:T 768:( 766:Z 751:T 749:( 747:B 735:T 733:( 731:A 716:T 712:T 708:T 706:( 704:A 701:D 697:T 695:( 693:A 689:D 683:T 681:( 679:B 675:T 673:( 671:A 621:B 617:A 605:B 602:T 598:A 595:T 590:A 587:T 583:A 580:T 575:B 572:T 568:A 565:T 557:B 554:T 550:A 547:T 541:B 538:T 534:B 531:T 525:B 522:T 518:A 515:T 494:T 472:T 447:B 425:T 403:A 381:T 359:T 337:T 315:B 293:A

Index

Gordon Pask
Gerard de Zeeuw
conversation theory
psychodynamics
Bateson's
panpsychism
cybernetics
Gerard de Zeeuw

parity
Borromean link
tensegrity

unit cell
tautomerism
interdisciplinary
positivist
social sciences
process theory
complementarity principle
exclusion principle
Knot theory
knots
Petri net
radiation
Stafford Beer
quantum computing
von Neumann architecture
truth value
analogy

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.