383:, it does not require huge sacrifices of human interests. Leopold does not, for example, believe that humans should stop eating or hunting, or experimenting on animals. Nor does he call for a massive reduction in the human population, or for permitting humans to interfere with nature only to satisfy vital human needs (regardless of economic or other human costs). As an environmental ethic, Leopold's land ethic is a comparatively moderate view that seeks to strike a balance between human interests and a healthy and biotically diverse natural environment. Many of the things mainstream environmentalists favor—preference for native plants and animals over invasive species, hunting or selective culling to control overpopulated species that are damaging to the environment, and a focus on preserving healthy, self-regenerating natural ecosystems both for human benefit and for their own intrinsic value—jibe with Leopold's ecocentric land ethic.
268:. When focusing on land use, egalitarianism evaluates its uneven distribution and the uneven distribution of the fruits of that land. While both a utilitarian- and libertarian-based land ethic could conceivably rationalize this mal-distribution, an egalitarian approach typically favors equality, whether that be an equal entitlement to land or access to food. However, there is also the question of negative rights when holding to an egalitarian-based ethic. In other words, if it is recognized that a person has a right to something, then someone has the responsibility to supply this opportunity or item; whether that be an individual person or the government. Thus, an egalitarian-based land ethic could provide a strong argument for the preservation of soil fertility and water because it links land and water with the right to food, the growth of human populations, and the decline of soil and water resources.
350:
the land; (2) that we should extend ethical consideration to ecological wholes ("soils, waters, plants, and animals"), (3) that our primary ethical concern should not be with individual plants or animals, but with the healthy functioning of whole biotic communities, and (4) that the "summary moral maxim" of ecological ethics is that we should seek to preserve the integrity, stability, and beauty of the biotic community. Beyond this, scholars disagree about the extent to which
Leopold rejected traditional human-centered approaches to the environment and how literally he intended his basic moral maxim to be applied. They also debate whether Leopold based his land ethic primarily on human-centered interests, as many passages in
456:
399:
integrity, stability, and beauty of the biotic community") to be regarded as an ethical absolute. Thus construed, it would prohibit clearing land to build homes, schools, or farms, and generally require a "hands-off" approach to nature that
Leopold plainly did not favor. Presumably, therefore, his maxim should be seen as a general guideline for valuing natural ecosystems and striving to achieve what he terms a sustainable state of "harmony between men and land." But this is vague and, according to some critics, not terribly helpful.
219:, generally it is the view that a morally right action is an action that produces the maximum good for people. Utilitarianism has often been used when deciding how to use land and it is closely connected with an economic-based ethic. For example, it forms the foundation for industrial farming; an increase in yield, which would increase the number of people able to receive goods from farmed land, is judged from this view to be a good action or approach. In fact, a common argument in favor of
403:
unclear why such examples support the land ethic specifically, as opposed to biocentrism or some other nature-friendly environmental ethic. Leopold also frequently appeals to modern ecology, evolutionary theory, and other scientific discoveries to support his land ethic. Some critics have suggested that such appeals may involve an illicit move from facts to values. At a minimum, such critics claim, more should be said about the normative basis of
Leopold's land ethic.
251:" was to place soil and water resources into the hands of private citizens. Hardin supplied utilitarian justifications to support his argument. However, it can be argued that this leaves libertarian-based land ethics open to the above critique lodged against economic-based approaches. Even excepting this, the libertarian view has been challenged by the critique that numerous people making self-interested decisions often cause large ecological disasters, such as the
428:
416:
pests, newly invasive predators, etc. Must humans act to prevent such ecological changes, and if so, at what cost? Why should we place such high value on current ecological balances? Why think it is our role to be nature's steward or policeman? According to these critics, Leopold's stress on preserving existing ecological balances is overly human-centered and fails to treat nature with the respect it deserves.
236:. Roughly, libertarianism is the ethical view that agents own themselves and have particular moral rights, including the right to acquire the property. In a looser sense, libertarianism is commonly identified with the belief that each individual person has a right to a maximum amount of freedom or liberty when this freedom does not interfere with other people's freedom. A well-known libertarian theorist is
470:
22:
224:
example, in the case of the farmer planting crops on a slope, if the runoff of soil into the community creek led to the damage of several neighbor's properties, then the good of the individual farmer would be overridden by the damage caused to his neighbors. Thus, while a utilitarian-based land ethic can be used to support economic activity, it can also be used to challenge this activity.
442:
149:
the health of the biotic community of the land. And second, it tends to relegate conservation necessary for healthy ecosystems to the government and these tasks are too large and dispersed to be adequately addressed by such an institution. This ties directly into the context within which
Leopold wrote
223:
is that it is a good practice because it increases the benefits for humans; benefits such as food abundance and a drop in food prices. However, a utilitarian-based land ethic is different from a purely economic one as it could be used to justify the limiting of a person's rights to make a profit. For
349:
Leopold was a naturalist, not a philosopher. There is much scholarly debate about what exactly
Leopold's land ethic asserts and how he argues for it. At its core, the land ethics claims (1) that humans should view themselves as plain members and citizens of biotic communities, not as "conquerors" of
263:
Egalitarian-based land ethics are often developed as a response to libertarianism. This is because, while libertarianism ensures the maximum amount of human liberty, it does not require that people help others. It also leads to the uneven distribution of wealth. A well-known egalitarian philosopher
148:
This is a land ethic based wholly upon economic self-interest.> Leopold sees two flaws in this type of ethic. First, he argues that most members of an ecosystem have no economic worth. For this reason, such an ethic can ignore or even eliminate these members when they are actually necessary for
402:
A second common criticism of
Leopold is that he fails to state clearly why we should adopt the land ethic. He often cites examples of environmental damage (e.g., soil erosion, pollution, and deforestation) that result from traditional human-centered, "conqueror" attitudes towards nature. But it is
139:
was the first systematic presentation of a holistic or ecocentric approach to the environment. Although
Leopold is credited with coining the term "land ethic", there are many philosophical theories that speak to how humans should treat the land. Some of the most prominent land ethics include those
415:
the integrity and stability of natural ecosystems, wouldn't this require frequent and costly human interventions to prevent naturally occurring changes to natural environments? In nature, the "stability and integrity" of ecosystems are disrupted or destroyed all the time by drought, fire, storms,
406:
Other critics object to
Leopold's ecological holism. According to animal rights advocate, Tom Regan, Leopold's land ethic condones sacrificing the good of individual animals to the good of the whole, and is thus a form of "environmental fascism." According to these critics, we rightly reject such
398:
Some critics fault
Leopold for lack of clarity in spelling out exactly what the land ethic is and its specific implications for how humans should think about the environment. It is clear that Leopold did not intend his basic normative principle ("A thing is right when it tends to preserve the
298:
view, which argues that human communities are built upon a foundation of the surrounding ecosystems or the biotic communities and that all life is of inherent worth. Similar to egalitarian-based land ethics, the above land ethics were also developed as alternatives to utilitarian and
281:, published in 1939. Brinser argued that white settlers brought with them "the seeds of a civilization which has grown by consuming the land, that is, a civilization which has used up the land in much the same way that a furnace burns coal.” Later,
276:
Land ethics may also be based upon the principle that the land (and the organisms that live off the land) has intrinsic value. These ethics are, roughly, based on an ecological or systems view. This position was first put forth by Ayers
Brinser in
337:, collectively referred to as "the land." Leopold states the basic principle of his land ethic as: "A thing is right when it tends to preserve the integrity, stability, and beauty of the biotic community. It is wrong when it tends otherwise."
410:
Finally, some critics have questioned whether Leopold's land ethic might require unacceptable interferences with nature in order to protect current, but transient, ecological balances. If the fundamental environmental imperative is to
132:(1949), a classic text of the environmental movement. There he argues that there is a critical need for a "new ethic", an "ethic dealing with human's relation to land and to the animals and plants which grow upon it".
340:
He also describes it in this way: "The land ethic simply enlarges the boundaries of the community to include soils, waters, plants, and animals, or collectively: the land . . . land ethic changes the role of
240:. For right-libertarians, property rights are natural rights. Thus, it would be acceptable for the above farmer to plant on a slope as long as this action does not limit the freedom of his or her neighbors.
362:
view of humans as plain members of nature and the cosmos, and the finding of modern ecology that ecosystems are complex, interrelated wholes. However, this interpretation has recently been challenged by
367:, who has offered evidence that Darwin's influence on Leopold was not related to Darwin's views about moral sentiments, but rather to Darwin's views about interdependence in the struggle for existence.
135:
Leopold offers an ecologically based land ethic that rejects strictly human-centered views of the environment and focuses on the preservation of healthy, self-renewing ecosystems.
299:
libertarian-based approaches. Leopold's ethic is one of the most popular ecological approaches in the early 21st century. Other writers and theorists who hold this view include
358:, has suggested that Leopold grounded his land ethics on various scientific claims, including a Darwinian view of ethics as rooted in special affections for kith and kin, a
375:
Leopold's ecocentric land ethic is popular today with mainstream environmentalists for a number of reasons. Unlike more radical environmental approaches, such as
868:
390:- are global public goods. Hence, land should be governed on a global scale as a commons, requiring increased international cooperation on nature preservation.
345:
from conqueror of the land community to plain member and citizen of it. It implies respect for his fellow-members, and also respect for the community as such."
255:
disaster. Even so, libertarianism is a philosophical view commonly held within the United States and, especially, held by U.S. ranchers and farmers.
243:
This view is closely connected to utilitarianism. Libertarians often use utilitarian arguments to support their own arguments. For example, in 1968,
386:
A related understanding has been framed as global land as a commons. In this view biodiversity and terrestrial carbon storage - an element of
795:
Millstein, Roberta L. (2015) “Re-examining the Darwinian Basis for Aldo Leopold’s Land Ethic,” Ethics, Policy & Environment 18: 301-317.
333:(1949), Leopold proposes that the next step in the evolution of ethics is the expansion of ethics to include nonhuman members of the
105:
312:
43:
874:
The Land Ethic—abridged html version, with commentary on its critique of Biblical traditions, full pdf version—neohasid.org
893:
86:
58:
908:
39:
354:
suggest, or whether he placed significant weight on the intrinsic value of nature. One prominent student of Leopold,
122:
is a philosophy or theoretical framework about how, ethically, humans should regard the land. The term was coined by
65:
32:
539:
407:
holistic approaches in human affairs. Why, they ask, should we adopt them in our treatment of non-human animals?
387:
534:
232:
Another philosophical approach often used to guide actions when making (or not making) changes to the land is
72:
248:
220:
504:
461:
329:
287:
176:
172:
128:
54:
681:
805:
549:
494:
380:
359:
559:
188:
903:
594:
584:
574:
499:
433:
355:
316:
308:
898:
364:
156:
654:
667:
569:
554:
529:
524:
427:
334:
304:
212:
196:
184:
564:
160:
878:
79:
873:
589:
544:
475:
447:
244:
233:
216:
208:
887:
300:
247:
applied this philosophy to land issues when he argued that the only solution to the "
180:
509:
376:
295:
282:
237:
123:
140:
rooted in economics, utilitarianism, libertarianism, egalitarianism, and ecology.
579:
514:
484:
164:
21:
469:
489:
423:
265:
168:
740:
Naess, Arne (1973) "The Shallow and the Deep, Long-Range Ecology Movement."
252:
192:
519:
171:
approach, becoming one of the first to popularize this term coined by
207:
Utilitarianism was most prominently defended by British philosophers
327:
In his classic essay, "The Land Ethic," published posthumously in
629:
Environmental Ethics: An Introduction to Environmental Philosophy
784:
In Defense of the Land Ethic: Essays in Environmental Philosophy
786:. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1989, pp. 75-99.
15:
846:. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983, pp. 361-62.
829:
827:
696:
Harden, Garrett. (1968) "The Tragedy of the Commons."
183:. Conservation became the preferred term for the more
710:
708:
706:
191:, while the writing of Leopold and his inspiration,
718:
ed. Gary L. Comstock. Raleigh: Springer Publishing.
46:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
752:
750:
8:
773:. p. 189. Oxford University Press, New York.
760:. p. 171. Oxford University Press, New York.
731:(Spring 2009 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.)
644:. p. 177. Oxford University Press, New York.
618:. p. 212. Oxford University Press, New York.
686:(Fall 2010 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.)
631:, 5th ed. Boston: Wadsworth, 2013, p. 179
106:Learn how and when to remove this message
163:, the prevailing ethos was economic and
729:The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
684:The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
607:
179:during his early 1900s research at the
682:Vallentyne, Peter, "Libertarianism",
215:. Though there are many varieties of
7:
727:Arneson, Richard, "Egalitarianism",
44:adding citations to reliable sources
669:Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
371:Attractions of Leopold's land ethic
14:
468:
454:
440:
426:
20:
806:Govern land as a global commons
714:Thompson, Paul. (2010) "Land."
31:needs additional citations for
655:"Understanding the Land Ethic"
291:(1949) popularized this idea.
1:
671:/ "History of Utilitarianism"
272:Ecologically based land ethic
259:Egalitarian-based land ethic
228:Libertarian-based land ethic
203:Utilitarian-based land ethic
195:, led to the development of
879:The Aldo Leopold Foundation
808:. Nature 546:7656 pp. 28-29
925:
844:The Case for Animal Rights
370:
322:
285:'s posthumously published
144:Economics-based land ethic
540:Environmental stewardship
388:climate change mitigation
323:Aldo Leopold's land ethic
535:Environmental protection
167:. Leopold argued for an
833:DesJardins, pp. 185-88.
294:Another example is the
627:DesJardins, Joseph R.
249:Tragedy of the Commons
221:industrial agriculture
155:For example, when the
151:A Sand County Almanac.
782:Callicott, J. Baird.
771:A Sand County Almanac
758:A Sand County Almanac
642:A Sand County Almanac
616:A Sand County Almanac
505:Conservation movement
462:Earth sciences portal
352:A Sand County Almanac
330:A Sand County Almanac
288:A Sand County Almanac
177:University of Chicago
173:Henry Chandler Cowles
137:A Sand County Almanac
129:A Sand County Almanac
894:Environmental ethics
819:Environmental Ethics
716:Life Science Ethics.
550:Habitat conservation
495:Conservation biology
40:improve this article
855:DesJardins, p. 194.
560:Natural environment
279:Our Use of the Land
189:resource management
126:(1887–1948) in his
909:1949 introductions
869:Land Ethic Toolbox
769:Leopold, A. 1949.
756:Leopold, A. 1949.
640:Leopold, A. 1949.
614:Leopold, A. 1949.
595:Water conservation
585:Southern Agrarians
575:Renewable resource
500:Conservation ethic
434:Environment portal
356:J. Baird Callicott
317:Barbara Kingsolver
309:J. Baird Callicott
365:Roberta Millstein
157:US Forest Service
116:
115:
108:
90:
916:
856:
853:
847:
840:
834:
831:
822:
815:
809:
802:
796:
793:
787:
780:
774:
767:
761:
754:
745:
738:
732:
725:
719:
712:
701:
700:, 162, 1243-1248
694:
688:
679:
673:
665:
659:
658:
651:
645:
638:
632:
625:
619:
612:
570:Natural resource
555:Land stewardship
530:Environmentalism
525:Ecology movement
478:
473:
472:
464:
459:
458:
457:
450:
445:
444:
443:
436:
431:
430:
335:biotic community
313:Paul B. Thompson
305:N. Scott Momaday
213:John Stuart Mill
197:environmentalism
111:
104:
100:
97:
91:
89:
48:
24:
16:
924:
923:
919:
918:
917:
915:
914:
913:
884:
883:
865:
860:
859:
854:
850:
841:
837:
832:
825:
816:
812:
803:
799:
794:
790:
781:
777:
768:
764:
755:
748:
739:
735:
726:
722:
713:
704:
695:
691:
680:
676:
666:
662:
653:
652:
648:
639:
635:
626:
622:
613:
609:
604:
599:
565:Natural capital
474:
467:
460:
455:
453:
446:
441:
439:
432:
425:
422:
396:
373:
348:
325:
274:
261:
230:
205:
185:anthropocentric
161:Gifford Pinchot
159:was founded by
146:
112:
101:
95:
92:
49:
47:
37:
25:
12:
11:
5:
922:
920:
912:
911:
906:
901:
896:
886:
885:
882:
881:
876:
871:
864:
863:External links
861:
858:
857:
848:
835:
823:
810:
797:
788:
775:
762:
746:
733:
720:
702:
689:
674:
660:
657:. 29 May 2015.
646:
633:
620:
606:
605:
603:
600:
598:
597:
592:
590:Sustainability
587:
582:
577:
572:
567:
562:
557:
552:
547:
545:Glenn Albrecht
542:
537:
532:
527:
522:
517:
512:
507:
502:
497:
492:
487:
481:
480:
479:
476:Biology portal
465:
451:
448:Ecology portal
437:
421:
418:
395:
392:
372:
369:
324:
321:
273:
270:
260:
257:
245:Garrett Hardin
234:libertarianism
229:
226:
217:utilitarianism
209:Jeremy Bentham
204:
201:
145:
142:
114:
113:
28:
26:
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
921:
910:
907:
905:
902:
900:
897:
895:
892:
891:
889:
880:
877:
875:
872:
870:
867:
866:
862:
852:
849:
845:
839:
836:
830:
828:
824:
821:, pp. 186-88.
820:
814:
811:
807:
804:Creutzig, F.
801:
798:
792:
789:
785:
779:
776:
772:
766:
763:
759:
753:
751:
747:
743:
737:
734:
730:
724:
721:
717:
711:
709:
707:
703:
699:
693:
690:
687:
685:
678:
675:
672:
670:
664:
661:
656:
650:
647:
643:
637:
634:
630:
624:
621:
617:
611:
608:
601:
596:
593:
591:
588:
586:
583:
581:
578:
576:
573:
571:
568:
566:
563:
561:
558:
556:
553:
551:
548:
546:
543:
541:
538:
536:
533:
531:
528:
526:
523:
521:
518:
516:
513:
511:
508:
506:
503:
501:
498:
496:
493:
491:
488:
486:
483:
482:
477:
471:
466:
463:
452:
449:
438:
435:
429:
424:
419:
417:
414:
408:
404:
400:
393:
391:
389:
384:
382:
378:
368:
366:
361:
357:
353:
346:
344:
338:
336:
332:
331:
320:
318:
314:
310:
306:
302:
301:Wendell Berry
297:
292:
290:
289:
284:
280:
271:
269:
267:
258:
256:
254:
250:
246:
241:
239:
235:
227:
225:
222:
218:
214:
210:
202:
200:
198:
194:
190:
186:
182:
181:Indiana Dunes
178:
174:
170:
166:
162:
158:
153:
152:
143:
141:
138:
133:
131:
130:
125:
121:
110:
107:
99:
96:November 2012
88:
85:
81:
78:
74:
71:
67:
64:
60:
57: –
56:
52:
51:Find sources:
45:
41:
35:
34:
29:This article
27:
23:
18:
17:
851:
843:
842:Regan, Tom.
838:
818:
817:DesJardins,
813:
800:
791:
783:
778:
770:
765:
757:
741:
736:
728:
723:
715:
697:
692:
683:
677:
668:
663:
649:
641:
636:
628:
623:
615:
610:
510:Deep Ecology
412:
409:
405:
401:
397:
385:
377:deep ecology
374:
351:
347:
343:Homo sapiens
342:
339:
328:
326:
296:deep ecology
293:
286:
283:Aldo Leopold
278:
275:
262:
242:
238:John Hospers
231:
206:
154:
150:
147:
136:
134:
127:
124:Aldo Leopold
119:
117:
102:
93:
83:
76:
69:
62:
55:"Land ethic"
50:
38:Please help
33:verification
30:
580:Solastalgia
515:Ecofeminism
485:Agrarianism
381:biocentrism
303:(b. 1934),
165:utilitarian
888:Categories
744:16: 95-100
602:References
490:Biomimicry
360:Copernican
266:John Rawls
169:ecological
120:land ethic
66:newspapers
904:Landscape
394:Criticism
253:Dust Bowl
193:John Muir
187:model of
899:Land use
420:See also
413:preserve
742:Inquiry
698:Science
520:Ecology
175:of the
80:scholar
315:, and
82:
75:
68:
61:
53:
87:JSTOR
73:books
211:and
59:news
379:or
264:is
42:by
890::
826:^
749:^
705:^
319:.
311:,
307:,
199:.
118:A
109:)
103:(
98:)
94:(
84:·
77:·
70:·
63:·
36:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
