172:, who had been elected in 195 BC. Cato argued that the law removed the shame of poverty because it made all women dress in an equal fashion. Cato insisted that if women could engage in a clothes-contest, they would either feel shame in the presence of other women, or on the contrary, they would delight in a rather base victory as a result of extending themselves beyond their means. He also declared that a woman's desire to spend money was a disease that could not be cured, but only restrained; the removal of
176:, Cato said, would render society helpless in limiting the expenditures of women. Cato pronounced that Roman women already corrupted by luxury were like wild animals who have once tasted blood in the sense that they can no longer be trusted to restrain themselves from rushing into an orgy of extravagance. Cato also chastises the men for letting their women sway them into repealing the law and affirms that its abrogation will cause the spread of luxury.
153:, wealth from the conquered areas began to flow into the hands of the Roman ruling class, transforming their lives from one of traditional agrarian simplicity to ostentatious display and unbounded extravagance. The victory made wealthier Romans aware of the possibilities of different, more comfortable life styles, and gave them access to more varied, more exotic and more luxurious products. During this period, there was an inevitable change of
157:, which in practice meant largely the conduct of individuals in the upper strata of Roman society; and with the financial woes eliminated, there was no longer a reason for women to restrict their expenditures. With Rome rich in Carthaginian wealth, attempts to check self-indulgent expenditure with sumptuary legislation proved vain. Consequently, two tribunes of the plebs, Marcus Fundanius and Lucius Valerius, proposed repealing the
68:, and it restricted not only a woman's wealth, but also her display of wealth. Specifically, it forbade any woman to possess more than half an ounce of gold, to wear a multi-colored garment (particularly those trimmed in purple), or to ride in an animal-drawn vehicle in the city or any town or within a mile thereof, except in the case of public religious festivals.
187:, elected in 195 BC. Flaccus contested Cato's assumption that there would be no rivalry among women if they did not own anything by reminding the audience of the suffering and anger Roman women feel when they see the wives of Latin allies wearing ornaments of which they have been deprived. Lucius Valerius Flaccus had further argued that the
140:
writes that Rome's excessive wealth from conquest caused the spread of luxury, leading to the downfall of Roman values and morals. A devotion to luxury was considered to be a stimulus to greed, and thus a major contributor to the increase in corruption. Finally, there was a widespread tendency to
105:
had been primarily an economic measure in response to serious financial issues during the Second Punic War. However, the restrictions it imposed laid the framework for later sumptuary legislation designed to control expenditure on extravagance for social rather than economic reasons. Notable
239:"). They blocked all the streets of the city and the approaches to the Forum, and implored the men as they descended to the Forum to allow the women to resume their former adornments. After the speeches against and in favor of the
195:. As such, he argues, it was never meant to keep women's spending and morality in check. Lucius Valerius also states that the privileges allotted to Roman women are already limited compared to Roman men; why restrict them further.
243:, the women poured into the streets the next day in greater numbers and besieged the doors of the two Brutuses. The dissenting tribunes eventually gave in to the persistent demanding of the Roman matrons, and the
136:
The basis for concern about luxury and extravagance was mixed. It was a universal assumption that indulgence in luxury could undermine traditional military virtues. In his satire book six,
233:. As Livy writes, the women could not be kept indoors by either the authority of the magistrates or the orders of their husbands or their own sense of propriety ("
57:
184:
90:
549:
431:
358:, M. Frederiksen, and R. Ogilvie, eds. The Cambridge Ancient History. 2nd ed. Vol. 8. New York: Cambridge UP, 1989. 181–185, 439, 453, 495.
287:
Lewis, Naphtali, and Meyer
Reinhold, eds. Roman Civilization: Selected Readings. 3rd ed. Vol. 1. New York: Columbia UP, 1990. 489–496.
168:
were led by two tribunes of the plebs, Marcus Junius Brutus and
Publius Junius Brutus, and consul Marcus Porcius Cato, also known as
53:
554:
367:
Hornblower, Simon, and Antony
Spawforth. "Lex Fannia." The Oxford Classical Dictionary. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford UP, 2003.
125:
was a statute that limited dinner expenditure, the kind of food that could be offered and the number of guests, while the
516:
376:
Hornblower, Simon, and Antony
Spawforth. "Lex Didia." The Oxford Classical Dictionary. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford UP, 2003.
324:
133:
to the entire
Italian peninsula that imposed sanctions on providers of, as well as guests at, illegal dinners.
460:"Tudor Humanists, London Printers, and the Status of Women: The Struggle over Livy in the Querelle des Femmes"
73:
141:
correlate lavish and self-indulgent expenditures with uneconomical use of personal or family fortunes.
191:
was only an emergency temporary law passed after the disastrous defeat of Roman soldiers in Cannae by
45:
41:
544:
495:
487:
437:
261:
411:
479:
427:
471:
419:
34:
30:
386:
539:
534:
230:
169:
86:
65:
528:
499:
441:
26:
214:
And although you, a man, are allowed to use purple for the blanket on your bed,
183:
were led by Marcus
Fundanius and Lucius Valerius, as well as the other consul,
423:
355:
49:
483:
256:
222:
Lucius
Valerius rebukes Cato the Elder. From the Ab Urbe Condita book 35.7.
218:
Even your horse will be more beautifully arrayed than your wife is clothed.
192:
150:
491:
459:
137:
475:
154:
78:
412:"The lex Oppia in Livy 34.1–7: Failed Persuasion and Decline"
207:
et equus tuus speciosius instratus erit quam uxor vestita?
149:
Following the Second Punic War, with Rome victorious over
205:
matrem familiae tuam purpureum amiculum habere non sines,
203:
et cum tibi viro liceat purpura in vestem stragulam uti,
301:
Johnston, Patricia A. "Poenulus 1, 2 and Roman Women."
416:
The
Ancient Art of Persuasion across Genres and Topics
303:
Transactions of the
American Philological Association
216:
will you not allow your wife to have a purple cloak?
33:during the days of national catastrophe after the
225:As nobles spoke for or against the repeal of the
8:
350:
348:
346:
344:
234:
201:feminis dumtaxat purpurae usu interdicemus?
199:
283:
281:
279:
277:
77:(From the founding of the city) book 34
297:
295:
293:
273:
212:Will we forbid women the use of purple?
106:sumptuary legislation passed after the
7:
453:
451:
410:Vassiliades, Georgios (2019-10-04).
387:"Juvenal, Satires. (1918). Satire 6"
319:
317:
315:
229:, the matrons of Rome crowded the
14:
179:The proponents of abolishing the
81:discusses the abolishment of the
54:Quintus Fabius Maximus Verrucosus
29:in 215 BC, at the height of the
236:nec auctoritate, nec uerecundia
1:
517:The Roman Law Library, incl.
64:was the first of a series of
58:Tiberius Sempronius Gracchus
418:. Brill. pp. 104–123.
571:
550:Women's rights legislation
129:was an application of the
37:, and repealed in 195 BC.
458:PHILO, JOHN-MARK (2016).
424:10.1163/9789004412552_008
25:was a law established in
247:was repealed in 195 BC.
85:from the perspective of
185:Lucius Valerius Flaccus
235:
220:
200:
164:The supporters of the
113:creation includes the
555:Women in ancient Rome
464:Renaissance Quarterly
325:"livy 34.4-7 week 10"
305:110 (1980): 143–159.
197:
46:tribune of the plebs
391:www.tertullian.org
262:List of Roman laws
117:of 161 BC and the
433:978-90-04-41255-2
329:www.u.arizona.edu
16:Ancient Roman law
562:
504:
503:
455:
446:
445:
407:
401:
400:
398:
397:
383:
377:
374:
368:
365:
359:
352:
339:
338:
336:
335:
321:
310:
299:
288:
285:
238:
209:
121:of 143 BC. The
112:
35:Battle of Cannae
31:Second Punic War
570:
569:
565:
564:
563:
561:
560:
559:
525:
524:
513:
508:
507:
457:
456:
449:
434:
409:
408:
404:
395:
393:
385:
384:
380:
375:
371:
366:
362:
353:
342:
333:
331:
323:
322:
313:
300:
291:
286:
275:
270:
253:
217:
215:
213:
206:
204:
202:
147:
110:
99:
91:Lucius Valerius
74:Ab urbe condita
17:
12:
11:
5:
568:
566:
558:
557:
552:
547:
542:
537:
527:
526:
523:
522:
512:
511:External links
509:
506:
505:
476:10.1086/686326
447:
432:
402:
378:
369:
360:
340:
311:
289:
272:
271:
269:
266:
265:
264:
259:
252:
249:
170:Cato the Elder
146:
143:
98:
95:
87:Cato the Elder
66:sumptuary laws
40:Instituted by
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
567:
556:
553:
551:
548:
546:
543:
541:
538:
536:
533:
532:
530:
521:
520:
515:
514:
510:
501:
497:
493:
489:
485:
481:
477:
473:
469:
465:
461:
454:
452:
448:
443:
439:
435:
429:
425:
421:
417:
413:
406:
403:
392:
388:
382:
379:
373:
370:
364:
361:
357:
351:
349:
347:
345:
341:
330:
326:
320:
318:
316:
312:
308:
304:
298:
296:
294:
290:
284:
282:
280:
278:
274:
267:
263:
260:
258:
255:
254:
250:
248:
246:
242:
237:
232:
228:
223:
219:
210:
208:
196:
194:
190:
186:
182:
177:
175:
171:
167:
162:
160:
156:
152:
144:
142:
139:
134:
132:
128:
124:
120:
116:
109:
104:
96:
94:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
75:
69:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
43:
42:Marcus Oppius
38:
36:
32:
28:
24:
23:
518:
470:(1): 40–79.
467:
463:
415:
405:
394:. Retrieved
390:
381:
372:
363:
332:. Retrieved
328:
306:
302:
244:
240:
226:
224:
221:
211:
198:
188:
180:
178:
173:
165:
163:
158:
148:
135:
130:
126:
122:
118:
114:
107:
102:
100:
82:
72:
70:
61:
39:
27:ancient Rome
21:
20:
18:
354:Astin, A.,
48:during the
529:Categories
396:2020-12-07
356:F. Walbank
334:2020-12-07
268:References
131:Lex Fannia
123:Lex Fannia
115:Lex Fannia
50:consulship
545:Roman law
500:156018054
484:0034-4338
442:211951150
257:Roman law
245:Lex Oppia
241:Lex Oppia
227:Lex Oppia
189:Lex Oppia
181:Lex Oppia
174:Lex Oppia
166:Lex Oppia
159:Lex Oppia
127:Lex Didia
119:Lex Didia
108:Lex Oppia
103:Lex Oppia
83:Lex Oppia
62:Lex Oppia
22:Lex Oppia
492:26559645
251:See also
193:Hannibal
151:Carthage
231:Capitol
138:Juvenal
71:In his
540:215 BC
535:195 BC
498:
490:
482:
440:
430:
145:Repeal
111:'s
97:Origin
60:, the
519:Leges
496:S2CID
488:JSTOR
438:S2CID
307:JSTOR
155:mores
480:ISSN
428:ISBN
101:The
89:and
79:Livy
56:and
44:, a
19:The
472:doi
420:doi
93:.
52:of
531::
494:.
486:.
478:.
468:69
466:.
462:.
450:^
436:.
426:.
414:.
389:.
343:^
327:.
314:^
292:^
276:^
161:.
502:.
474::
444:.
422::
399:.
337:.
309:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.