93:
27:
241:
Everyone is responsible, not only for the result of his willful acts, but also for an injury occasioned to another by his want of ordinary care or skill in the management of his property or person, except so far as the latter has, willfully or by want of ordinary care, brought the injury upon
209:
The case came out of a traffic accident between the plaintiff and the defendant in which both of them had been found to have been driving negligently. The plaintiff (Li) had attempted to cross three lanes of oncoming traffic to enter a
610:
1095:
230:
The
California Supreme Court, aware of the recent trend toward comparative rather than contributory negligence, took the opportunity to reconsider the state's tort law on the subject.
1291:
364:
1037:
743:
868:
815:
214:; the defendant's (Yellow Cab Co.) driver was traveling at an excessive speed when he ran a yellow light just before striking the plaintiff's car. The doctrine of
1243:
1317:
535:
1150:
736:
460:
250:
had not meant to stop the evolution of the common law, which is quite normal in state tort law, but rather only to clarify the law that existed at the time.
590:
962:
1088:
507:
357:
1327:
528:
1006:
951:
722:
1322:
688:
350:
1270:
999:
674:
422:
267:
1263:
1157:
70:
1129:
861:
875:
695:
1122:
822:
279:
37:
337:
1202:
1055:
629:
247:
1332:
1193:
896:
476:
186:
103:
944:
681:
1164:
847:
808:
429:
1284:
52:
92:
1079:
781:
215:
198:
48:
1213:
985:
373:
190:
601:
521:
234:
320:
138:
1115:
761:
500:
491:
168:
311:
302:
903:
706:
158:
1136:
937:
774:
765:
555:
514:
1106:
992:
838:
834:
799:
750:
715:
667:
415:
401:
242:
himself. The extent of liability in such cases is defined by the Title on
Compensatory Relief.
237:, which had been thought to codify the "all-or-nothing" approach to contributory negligence:
1277:
1254:
1236:
1229:
1070:
971:
882:
854:
788:
729:
660:
573:
562:
546:
487:
469:
449:
440:
1171:
930:
921:
910:
889:
408:
392:
211:
329:
1143:
978:
583:
1311:
246:
The plain meaning of section 1714 was quite clear, but the court concluded that the
651:
642:
621:
219:
233:
The only unique feature of the case was its reasoning on
Section 1714 of the
1021:
342:
388:
280:
California Civil Code, Division 4, Part 1, Title 2: Compensatory Relief
181:, 13 Cal.3d 804, 532 P.2d 1226 (1975), commonly referred to simply as
55:. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed.
194:
142:
346:
20:
611:
Redbox
Automated Retail LLC v. Universal City Studios LLLP
1096:
Indiana Harbor Belt
Railroad Co. v. American Cyanamid Co.
222:
law at the time would have prevented any recovery to Li.
298:, 13 Cal.3d 804, 532 P.2d 1226 (1975) is available from:
44:
1292:
State Farm Mutual
Automobile Insurance Co. v. Campbell
1038:
Spur
Industries, Inc. v. Del E. Webb Development Co.
1253:
1212:
1192:
1185:
1105:
1078:
1069:
1047:
1029:
1020:
961:
920:
832:
798:
760:
744:
Tarasoff v. Regents of the
University of California
705:
650:
641:
620:
600:
572:
545:
486:
459:
439:
387:
380:
164:
154:
149:
134:
119:
109:
99:
85:
869:Seong Sil Kim v. New York City Transit Authority
816:Farwell v. Boston & Worcester Railroad Corp.
239:
536:Sioux City & Pacific Railroad Co. v. Stout
358:
338:Li v. Yellow Cab Co. Case Brief at Lawnix.com
8:
1151:Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson
737:Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital
461:intentional infliction of emotional distress
1244:American Motorcycle Ass'n v. Superior Court
1089:Alwin v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
591:Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co.
1189:
1075:
1026:
963:Negligent infliction of emotional distress
647:
384:
365:
351:
343:
91:
82:
508:CompuServe Inc. v. Cyber Promotions, Inc.
71:Learn how and when to remove this message
529:United Zinc & Chemical Co. v. Britt
259:
16:1975 California Supreme Court decision
1007:Molien v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals
952:Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.
723:Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Botsford
7:
1318:Supreme Court of California case law
689:Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co.
266:California Legislative Information,
1000:Miller v. National Broadcasting Co.
675:Jablonski by Pahls v. United States
423:Picard v. Barry Pontiac-Buick, Inc.
1264:BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore
14:
1271:Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants
1158:Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.
1130:Friend v. Childs Dining Hall Co.
862:United States v. GlaxoSmithKline
25:
876:United States v. Johnson (1987)
696:Mexicali Rose v. Superior Court
1328:1975 in United States case law
1123:Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories
823:Vance v. Ball State University
189:case that judicially embraced
1:
1203:Walt Disney World Co. v. Wood
1056:Boomer v. Atlantic Cement Co.
630:United States defamation law
268:Civil Code, section 1714 (a)
248:California State Legislature
1323:United States tort case law
1194:Joint and several liability
897:Yount v. City of Sacramento
477:Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
104:Supreme Court of California
51:the claims made and adding
1349:
945:Ultramares Corp. v. Touche
682:Kerans v. Porter Paint Co.
270:, accessed 20 January 2021
1165:Chysky v. Drake Bros. Co.
848:Boub v. Township of Wayne
809:Albro v. Agawam Canal Co.
430:Sheridan v. United States
90:
1285:Honda Motor Co. v. Oberg
197:law and rejected strict
187:California Supreme Court
123:March 31, 1975
1080:Ultrahazardous activity
782:Hitaffer v. Argonne Co.
216:contributory negligence
199:contributory negligence
1214:Comparative negligence
986:Archibald v. Braverman
374:United States tort law
244:
191:comparative negligence
114:Li v. Yellow Cab Co.
602:Tortious interference
522:Intel Corp. v. Hamidi
1223:Li v. Yellow Cab Co.
1116:Thomas v. Winchester
501:Rowland v. Christian
492:Trespass to chattels
296:Li v. Yellow Cab Co.
178:Li v. Yellow Cab Co.
169:William P. Clark Jr.
86:Li v. Yellow Cab Co.
904:Pearson v. Callahan
707:Medical malpractice
159:Raymond L. Sullivan
1333:1975 in California
1137:Loop v. Litchfield
938:Ybarra v. Spangard
833:Public Authority,
775:Cahoon v. Cummings
766:Loss of consortium
576:, Publicity rights
556:Haslem v. Lockwood
515:Dougherty v. Stepp
36:possibly contains
1305:
1304:
1301:
1300:
1181:
1180:
1107:Product liability
1065:
1064:
1016:
1015:
993:Thing v. La Chusa
839:Negligence per se
800:Common employment
751:Scott v. Bradford
716:Landeros v. Flood
668:Trimarco v. Klein
637:
636:
416:Vosburg v. Putney
402:Garratt v. Dailey
381:Intentional Torts
174:
173:
81:
80:
73:
38:original research
1340:
1278:Pearson v. Chung
1255:Punitive damages
1237:Hoffman v. Jones
1230:Knight v. Jewett
1190:
1076:
1071:Strict liability
1027:
972:Krouse v. Graham
883:Martin v. Herzog
855:Briscoe v. LaHue
789:Werling v. Sandy
730:Mohr v. Williams
661:Brown v. Kendall
648:
563:Popov v. Hayashi
488:Trespass to land
470:Snyder v. Phelps
450:Hartman v. Moore
441:Abuse of process
385:
367:
360:
353:
344:
334:
328:
325:
319:
316:
310:
307:
301:
282:
277:
271:
264:
130:
128:
95:
83:
76:
69:
65:
62:
56:
53:inline citations
29:
28:
21:
1348:
1347:
1343:
1342:
1341:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1308:
1307:
1306:
1297:
1249:
1208:
1177:
1172:Devlin v. Smith
1101:
1061:
1043:
1012:
957:
931:Summers v. Tice
916:
911:Saucier v. Katz
890:Tedla v. Ellman
828:
794:
756:
701:
633:
616:
596:
568:
541:
482:
455:
435:
409:Katko v. Briney
376:
371:
332:
326:
323:
317:
314:
308:
305:
299:
291:
286:
285:
278:
274:
265:
261:
256:
228:
212:service station
207:
126:
124:
77:
66:
60:
57:
42:
30:
26:
17:
12:
11:
5:
1346:
1344:
1336:
1335:
1330:
1325:
1320:
1310:
1309:
1303:
1302:
1299:
1298:
1296:
1295:
1288:
1281:
1274:
1267:
1259:
1257:
1251:
1250:
1248:
1247:
1240:
1233:
1226:
1218:
1216:
1210:
1209:
1207:
1206:
1198:
1196:
1187:
1183:
1182:
1179:
1178:
1176:
1175:
1168:
1161:
1154:
1147:
1144:Losee v. Clute
1140:
1133:
1126:
1119:
1111:
1109:
1103:
1102:
1100:
1099:
1092:
1084:
1082:
1073:
1067:
1066:
1063:
1062:
1060:
1059:
1051:
1049:
1045:
1044:
1042:
1041:
1033:
1031:
1024:
1018:
1017:
1014:
1013:
1011:
1010:
1003:
996:
989:
982:
979:Dillon v. Legg
975:
967:
965:
959:
958:
956:
955:
948:
941:
934:
926:
924:
918:
917:
915:
914:
907:
900:
893:
886:
879:
872:
865:
858:
851:
843:
841:
835:Fireman's rule
830:
829:
827:
826:
819:
812:
804:
802:
796:
795:
793:
792:
785:
778:
770:
768:
762:Wrongful death
758:
757:
755:
754:
747:
740:
733:
726:
719:
711:
709:
703:
702:
700:
699:
692:
685:
678:
671:
664:
656:
654:
645:
639:
638:
635:
634:
626:
624:
618:
617:
615:
614:
606:
604:
598:
597:
595:
594:
587:
584:Taus v. Loftus
579:
577:
570:
569:
567:
566:
559:
551:
549:
543:
542:
540:
539:
532:
525:
518:
511:
504:
496:
494:
484:
483:
481:
480:
473:
465:
463:
457:
456:
454:
453:
445:
443:
437:
436:
434:
433:
426:
419:
412:
405:
397:
395:
382:
378:
377:
372:
370:
369:
362:
355:
347:
341:
340:
335:
312:Google Scholar
290:
289:External links
287:
284:
283:
272:
258:
257:
255:
252:
227:
224:
206:
203:
193:in California
172:
171:
166:
162:
161:
156:
152:
151:
147:
146:
136:
132:
131:
121:
117:
116:
111:
110:Full case name
107:
106:
101:
97:
96:
88:
87:
79:
78:
33:
31:
24:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1345:
1334:
1331:
1329:
1326:
1324:
1321:
1319:
1316:
1315:
1313:
1294:
1293:
1289:
1287:
1286:
1282:
1280:
1279:
1275:
1273:
1272:
1268:
1266:
1265:
1261:
1260:
1258:
1256:
1252:
1246:
1245:
1241:
1239:
1238:
1234:
1232:
1231:
1227:
1225:
1224:
1220:
1219:
1217:
1215:
1211:
1205:
1204:
1200:
1199:
1197:
1195:
1191:
1188:
1184:
1174:
1173:
1169:
1167:
1166:
1162:
1160:
1159:
1155:
1153:
1152:
1148:
1146:
1145:
1141:
1139:
1138:
1134:
1132:
1131:
1127:
1125:
1124:
1120:
1118:
1117:
1113:
1112:
1110:
1108:
1104:
1098:
1097:
1093:
1091:
1090:
1086:
1085:
1083:
1081:
1077:
1074:
1072:
1068:
1058:
1057:
1053:
1052:
1050:
1046:
1040:
1039:
1035:
1034:
1032:
1028:
1025:
1023:
1019:
1009:
1008:
1004:
1002:
1001:
997:
995:
994:
990:
988:
987:
983:
981:
980:
976:
974:
973:
969:
968:
966:
964:
960:
954:
953:
949:
947:
946:
942:
940:
939:
935:
933:
932:
928:
927:
925:
923:
919:
913:
912:
908:
906:
905:
901:
899:
898:
894:
892:
891:
887:
885:
884:
880:
878:
877:
873:
871:
870:
866:
864:
863:
859:
857:
856:
852:
850:
849:
845:
844:
842:
840:
836:
831:
825:
824:
820:
818:
817:
813:
811:
810:
806:
805:
803:
801:
797:
791:
790:
786:
784:
783:
779:
777:
776:
772:
771:
769:
767:
763:
759:
753:
752:
748:
746:
745:
741:
739:
738:
734:
732:
731:
727:
725:
724:
720:
718:
717:
713:
712:
710:
708:
704:
698:
697:
693:
691:
690:
686:
684:
683:
679:
677:
676:
672:
670:
669:
665:
663:
662:
658:
657:
655:
653:
649:
646:
644:
640:
632:
631:
625:
623:
619:
613:
612:
608:
607:
605:
603:
599:
593:
592:
588:
586:
585:
581:
580:
578:
575:
571:
565:
564:
560:
558:
557:
553:
552:
550:
548:
544:
538:
537:
533:
531:
530:
526:
524:
523:
519:
517:
516:
512:
510:
509:
505:
503:
502:
498:
497:
495:
493:
489:
485:
479:
478:
474:
472:
471:
467:
466:
464:
462:
458:
452:
451:
447:
446:
444:
442:
438:
432:
431:
427:
425:
424:
420:
418:
417:
413:
411:
410:
406:
404:
403:
399:
398:
396:
394:
390:
386:
383:
379:
375:
368:
363:
361:
356:
354:
349:
348:
345:
339:
336:
331:
322:
313:
304:
303:CourtListener
297:
293:
292:
288:
281:
276:
273:
269:
263:
260:
253:
251:
249:
243:
238:
236:
231:
225:
223:
221:
217:
213:
204:
202:
200:
196:
192:
188:
184:
180:
179:
170:
167:
163:
160:
157:
153:
150:Case opinions
148:
144:
140:
139:13 Cal.3d 804
137:
133:
122:
118:
115:
112:
108:
105:
102:
98:
94:
89:
84:
75:
72:
64:
54:
50:
46:
40:
39:
34:This article
32:
23:
22:
19:
1290:
1283:
1276:
1269:
1262:
1242:
1235:
1228:
1222:
1221:
1201:
1170:
1163:
1156:
1149:
1142:
1135:
1128:
1121:
1114:
1094:
1087:
1054:
1036:
1005:
998:
991:
984:
977:
970:
950:
943:
936:
929:
909:
902:
895:
888:
881:
874:
867:
860:
853:
846:
821:
814:
807:
787:
780:
773:
749:
742:
735:
728:
721:
714:
694:
687:
680:
673:
666:
659:
652:Duty of care
627:
609:
589:
582:
561:
554:
534:
527:
520:
513:
506:
499:
475:
468:
448:
428:
421:
414:
407:
400:
295:
275:
262:
245:
240:
232:
229:
208:
182:
177:
176:
175:
113:
67:
58:
35:
18:
155:Decision by
1312:Categories
643:Negligence
622:Defamation
547:Conversion
254:References
235:Civil Code
220:California
205:Background
127:1975-03-31
45:improve it
922:Causation
135:Citations
49:verifying
1022:Nuisance
294:Text of
226:Decision
61:May 2012
1186:Damages
1048:Private
574:Privacy
393:Battery
389:Assault
185:, is a
165:Dissent
125: (
120:Decided
43:Please
1030:Public
490:&
391:&
333:
330:Leagle
327:
324:
321:Justia
318:
315:
309:
306:
300:
141:; 532
100:Court
628:See
195:tort
145:1226
143:P.2d
218:in
47:by
1314::
837:,
764:,
201:.
183:Li
366:e
359:t
352:v
129:)
74:)
68:(
63:)
59:(
41:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
