137:
knowledge of the two net forces and of the precise geometry allowed the desired resolution. Rather than fix the rectangular frame directly to the lower longerons and provide alternative locations to change the geometry, Parnall made its readjustment simple by hanging the frame on hinged, near vertical struts from the upper longerons and fixing it in place with four further locating struts from frame to lower longerons. The angle could then be changed by using locating struts of different lengths. Though two angles were sufficient to get the lift and drag, a third measurement at another angle was often made as a cross check. The locating struts lengths were designed so that the wing stayed in the same place and at the same angle of incidence throughout. However, other choices of location strut lengths allowed the wing to be flown at different angles of incidence, for example the high angle experienced by slotted wings. The lift struts entered the fuselage via short horizontal slots to allow from the geometry changes.
133:
this would avoid complications like wing root interference, and made the wing mounting structure into a single unit with some freedom to deflect internally so that the force could be measured. A typical parasol wing aircraft has lift struts from the lower fuselage to the wing plus some upper fuselage struts to support the wing near the centre line. The
Parasol had two lift struts under each wing, with their lower ends joined within the fuselage to a horizontal rectangular frame. Two inverted V members were also attached to this frame, one at the front and one at the back, rising almost vertically to the front and rear wing spars. The V-struts were hinged top and bottom, allowing the wing to move parallel to the horizontal frame under aerodynamic loads. The force was measured by a dynamometer ahead of the front cockpit, via a linkage which ran down and forward from the wing at an angle of about 22°, then turned back to the instrument via a crank.
146:
cockpit, behind and with a view unobstructed by the wing had two unusual controls associated with the measurements. He could engage a pair of dynamometer cams which limited its movement and that of the wings to the 6 mm necessary for a force measurement in case of a dynamometer failure. He also controlled an hydraulic brake which was used to stop the engine during measurements and avoid prop wash interference. After a period of gliding flight, the engine could be restarted with a gas starter.
140:
The two different wings known to have been fitted to the
Parasol both had constant chord and very square tips. They were of fabric covered wood construction. The quite slender fuselage was a mixture of steel tubes and spruce, square sided aft of the cockpits and rounded forwards. The supercharged
132:
contract to produce such an aircraft were to ensure that, so far as possible the behaviour of the wing was unaffected by interference with the flow over the fuselage or by prop wash, and to devise a way of measuring lift and drag forces whilst in flight. They decided on a parasol wing design, since
120:
than real aircraft, making the data difficult to scale up. In the late 1920s there was only one tunnel big enough to take full size aircraft propellers, and one which by running at high pressure could reach realistic
Reynolds numbers with aircraft models; both of these were recent and in the USA.
145:
radial engine was smoothly cowled but with its cylinder heads exposed. The observer sat in the front cockpit, allowing him direct access to the dynamometer. This had a control wheel and dial for the force readings, plus a lever with which he could free, read or lock the instrument. The pilot's
136:
This single force measurement could not resolve the drag and lift components. This was done by making two force measurements on different flights and with slightly different support structure geometries, one with the parallel V-struts leaning a little forwards, a second with them leaning back; a
149:
The rest of the aircraft was conventional. It had a finless, comma shaped rudder, a tailplane mounted on top of the fuselage, braced from below and carrying separate elevators. Tailplane incidence was adjustable from the cockpit. The undercarriage was the divided type with wide splayed main
180:) was initially fitted with a fully slotted wing of the well-used RAF28 section. At one stage the upper surface of its wing was covered in wool tufts and a camera was fitted to a high pylon just in front of the tail to record their behaviour. The second (
154:
legs joining the fuselage below and between the wing struts. There were bracing struts forward to the engine bulkhead and the axles sloped inwards and upwards to a post below the fuselage, all rather like a strengthened version of the on the
175:
in
September and October. The standard height for measurement flights was about 8,000 ft (2,400 m) and the supercharged engine took the aircraft to this altitude in a little over 12 minutes. The first of the Parasols (RAF serial
115:
There have always been problems in getting an understanding of full-scale aircraft behavior from wind tunnel data. Most of these problems arise because small scale models in atmospheric pressure tunnels operate at much lower
200:"test of wing section". The flight air log was lowered in flight below the port wing. The second Parasol remained in use at Farnborough until August 1936 and the first flew on until January 1937.
125:
was built to study the drag of different cowlings for radial engines and the
Parnall Parasol to measure the forces acting on wings of different section in flight.
663:
541:
121:
It is therefore not surprising that some aircraft were designed specifically to undertake aerodynamic studies of particular components. In the UK, the
683:
678:
509:
490:
471:
673:
534:
329:
103:
aircraft design to measure the aerodynamic forces on wings in flight. Two were built and flown in the early 1930s in the
168:
668:
527:
184:) flew with wings having full-span split trailing edges and out-rigged ailerons and was given the designation of
283:
142:
421:
151:
97:
33:
597:
172:
505:
486:
467:
167:
The
Parasol first flew during 1930, two being built in quick succession and both going to the
567:
122:
117:
632:
582:
577:
572:
48:
657:
622:
612:
592:
587:
562:
637:
607:
602:
129:
100:
642:
617:
156:
192:. 1930 Farnborough records log the two as in the Aerodynamic Flight, with
550:
259:
58:
519:
189:
523:
301:
118 mph (190 km/h, 103 kn) at 8,000 ft (2,438 m)
307:
56 mph (90 km/h, 49 kn) at 8,000 ft (2,438 m)
286:
IV 7-cylinder supercharged radial, 226 hp (169 kW)
104:
435:
although Flight has it as a "wooden girder structure"
128:The two main problems facing Parnall when given an
207:Specifications (Parasol with initial RAF28 wing)
535:
8:
483:Farnborough - 100 years of British aviation
542:
528:
520:
466:. Cambridge: Cambridge University House.
485:. Hinkley, England: Midland Publishing.
417:
415:
413:
411:
402:
390:
378:
346:
444:
196:doing "flight path recorder" work and
20:
366:
362:
360:
358:
356:
354:
352:
350:
214:
7:
504:. Annopolis: Naval Institute Press.
16:Experimental parasol-winged aircraft
664:1930s British experimental aircraft
243:42 ft 0 in (12.80 m)
237:30 ft 4 in (9.25 m)
14:
255:294 sq ft (27.3 m)
249:9 ft 6 in (2.90 m)
684:Single-engined tractor aircraft
462:Anderson, John D. Jnr. (1997).
319:12.4 min to 8,000 ft (2,438 m)
1:
330:List of experimental aircraft
313:29,200 ft (8,900 m)
276:2,869 lb (1,301 kg)
270:2,222 lb (1,008 kg)
679:Aircraft first flown in 1930
169:Royal Aircraft Establishment
502:Parnall Aircraft since 1914
425:17 February 1931 p.329-333
700:
188:, having been modified by
141:226 hp (169 kW)
59:George Parnall and Company
558:
464:A History of Aerodynamics
23:
481:Cooper, Peter J (2006).
500:Wixey, Kenneth (1990).
284:Armstrong Siddeley Lynx
222:General characteristics
143:Armstrong Siddeley Lynx
111:Design and development
674:Parasol-wing aircraft
34:experimental aircraft
123:Bristol "Laboratory"
163:Operational history
393:, pp. 328–330
369:, pp. 175–180
651:
650:
317:Time to altitude:
90:
89:
691:
669:Parnall aircraft
544:
537:
530:
521:
515:
496:
477:
448:
442:
436:
433:
427:
419:
406:
405:, pp. 301–4
400:
394:
388:
382:
376:
370:
364:
311:Service ceiling:
294:
224:
118:Reynolds numbers
83:
45:
37:Type of aircraft
21:
699:
698:
694:
693:
692:
690:
689:
688:
654:
653:
652:
647:
554:
548:
518:
512:
499:
493:
480:
474:
461:
457:
452:
451:
443:
439:
434:
430:
420:
409:
401:
397:
389:
385:
377:
373:
365:
348:
343:
338:
290:
220:
209:
203:
165:
113:
94:Parnall Parasol
81:
44:National origin
43:
38:
17:
12:
11:
5:
697:
695:
687:
686:
681:
676:
671:
666:
656:
655:
649:
648:
646:
645:
640:
635:
630:
625:
620:
615:
610:
605:
600:
595:
590:
585:
580:
575:
570:
565:
559:
556:
555:
549:
547:
546:
539:
532:
524:
517:
516:
510:
497:
491:
478:
472:
458:
456:
453:
450:
449:
437:
428:
407:
395:
383:
371:
345:
344:
342:
339:
337:
334:
333:
332:
321:
320:
314:
308:
302:
299:Maximum speed:
288:
287:
277:
271:
265:
256:
250:
244:
238:
232:
217:, pp. 180
208:
205:
164:
161:
112:
109:
101:parasol winged
88:
87:
84:
78:
77:
74:
70:
69:
66:
62:
61:
56:
52:
51:
49:United Kingdom
46:
40:
39:
36:
30:
26:
25:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
696:
685:
682:
680:
677:
675:
672:
670:
667:
665:
662:
661:
659:
644:
641:
639:
636:
634:
631:
629:
626:
624:
621:
619:
616:
614:
611:
609:
606:
604:
601:
599:
596:
594:
591:
589:
586:
584:
581:
579:
576:
574:
571:
569:
566:
564:
561:
560:
557:
552:
545:
540:
538:
533:
531:
526:
525:
522:
513:
511:1-55750-930-1
507:
503:
498:
494:
488:
484:
479:
475:
469:
465:
460:
459:
454:
447:, p. 203
446:
441:
438:
432:
429:
426:
424:
418:
416:
414:
412:
408:
404:
403:Anderson 1997
399:
396:
392:
391:Anderson 1997
387:
384:
381:, p. 301
380:
379:Anderson 1997
375:
372:
368:
363:
361:
359:
357:
355:
353:
351:
347:
340:
335:
331:
328:
327:
326:
325:
324:Related lists
318:
315:
312:
309:
306:
303:
300:
297:
296:
295:
293:
285:
281:
278:
275:
274:Gross weight:
272:
269:
268:Empty weight:
266:
263:
261:
257:
254:
251:
248:
245:
242:
239:
236:
233:
230:
227:
226:
225:
223:
218:
216:
213:
206:
204:
201:
199:
195:
191:
187:
183:
179:
174:
170:
162:
160:
158:
153:
147:
144:
138:
134:
131:
126:
124:
119:
110:
108:
106:
102:
99:
95:
85:
80:
79:
75:
73:First flight
72:
71:
68:Harold Bolas
67:
64:
63:
60:
57:
55:Manufacturer
54:
53:
50:
47:
42:
41:
35:
31:
28:
27:
22:
19:
627:
501:
482:
463:
455:Bibliography
440:
431:
422:
398:
386:
374:
336:Bibliography
323:
322:
316:
310:
305:Stall speed:
304:
298:
291:
289:
279:
273:
267:
258:
252:
246:
240:
234:
228:
221:
219:
211:
210:
202:
197:
193:
185:
181:
177:
166:
148:
139:
135:
130:Air Ministry
127:
114:
98:experimental
93:
91:
82:Number built
32:Aerodynamic
18:
492:185780239-X
473:0-521669553
445:Cooper 2006
292:Performance
280:Powerplant:
173:Farnborough
157:Parnall Elf
658:Categories
367:Wixey 1990
253:Wing area:
215:Wixey 1990
598:Gyroplane
341:Citations
241:Wingspan:
212:Data from
65:Designer
553:aircraft
186:Avro 661
24:Parasol
628:Parasol
568:Panther
551:Parnall
260:Airfoil
247:Height:
235:Length:
96:was an
633:G.4/31
583:Possum
578:Plover
573:Puffin
508:
489:
470:
423:Flight
623:Prawn
613:Pipit
593:Perch
588:Pixie
563:Scout
264:RAF28
229:Crew:
198:K1229
194:K1228
182:K1229
178:K1228
76:1930
29:Role
638:Heck
608:Pike
603:Peto
506:ISBN
487:ISBN
468:ISBN
282:1 ×
190:Avro
152:oleo
92:The
643:Imp
618:Elf
171:at
660::
410:^
349:^
159:.
107:.
105:UK
86:2
543:e
536:t
529:v
514:.
495:.
476:.
262::
231:2
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.