Knowledge (XXG)

Physician–patient privilege

Source 📝

588:. In some jurisdictions, the doctor cannot be forced to reveal the information revealed by their patient to anyone except to particular organizations, as specified by law, and they too are required to keep that information confidential. If, in the case the police become aware of such information, they are not allowed to use it in court as proof of the sexual misconduct, except as provided by express intent of the legislative body and formalized into law. 36: 550:
jurisdictions. Almost every jurisdiction that recognizes physician–patient privilege not to testify in court, either by statute or through case law, limits the privilege to knowledge acquired during the course of providing medical services. In some jurisdictions, conversations between a patient and
572:
so that the physician can properly treat the patient. If the patient were fearful of telling the truth to the physician because they believed the physician would report such behavior to the authorities, the treatment process could be rendered far more difficult, or the physician could make an
584:. The doctor is usually required to obtain a list of the patient's sexual contacts to inform them that they need treatment. This is an important health concern. However, the patient may be reluctant to divulge the names of their older sexual partners, for fear that they will be charged with 564:
that the patient may be suing at the time cannot ask the doctor if the patient ever expressed the belief that their condition had improved. However, the rule generally does not apply to confidences shared with physicians when they are not serving in the role of medical providers.
625:
At the state level, the extent of the privilege varies depending on the law of the applicable jurisdiction. For example, in Texas there is only a limited physician–patient privilege in criminal proceedings, and the privilege is limited in civil cases as well.
559:
The privilege may cover the situation where a patient confesses to a psychiatrist that they committed a particular crime. It may also cover normal inquiries regarding matters such as injuries that may result in civil action. For example, any
241: 811: 638:, a privilege exists for "communication made by a person in confidence to another person .... in the course of a relationship in which the confidant was acting in a professional capacity" 53: 763: 606:, except in cases where law enforcement officers seek blood or urine test samples and test results taken from a patient who is being investigated for 595:, requires that physicians report patients who, in the opinion of the physician, may be unfit to drive for medical reasons as per Section 203 of the 908: 895: 883: 871: 859: 847: 835: 100: 72: 518: 79: 86: 940: 119: 688: 569: 68: 603: 57: 698: 683: 581: 426: 391: 294: 635: 511: 401: 46: 708: 619: 607: 304: 193: 93: 738: 431: 386: 246: 208: 188: 504: 357: 261: 231: 226: 367: 703: 678: 666: 342: 327: 270: 183: 178: 163: 950: 935: 596: 347: 483: 332: 289: 251: 777: 757: 543: 448: 411: 406: 352: 337: 236: 945: 443: 421: 396: 322: 299: 279: 173: 17: 693: 662: 658: 592: 535: 416: 284: 217: 203: 585: 577: 362: 256: 135: 602:
The law in New Hampshire places physician–patient communications on the same basis as
929: 198: 168: 642:
This is often interpreted as being between a health professional and their patient.
492: 478: 35: 801:
Texas Occupations Code section 159.003 and Texas Rules of Evidence, Rule 509(b)
727:
American / English Encyclopedia of the Law Page 611, Paragraph 27, 8th Edition
654: 650: 547: 458: 437: 561: 539: 487: 158: 568:
The reasoning behind the rule is that a level of trust must exist in the
468: 376: 313: 646: 542:
from being used against the patient in court. It is a part of the
645:
In some jurisdictions in Australia privilege may also extend to
473: 551:
physician may be privileged in both criminal and civil courts.
143: 29: 538:, that protects communications between a patient and their 812:"Privileges protecting other confidential communications" 739:"Medical Review - Physicians' Reporting Requirements" 737:
Transportation, Government of Ontario, Ministry of.
60:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. 27:
Protection against medical patient details in court
665:, or settlement negotiations, which may also be 512: 8: 778:"Section 329:26 Confidential Communications" 762:: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( 622:do not recognize doctor–patient privilege. 519: 505: 131: 120:Learn how and when to remove this message 720: 456: 375: 312: 269: 216: 150: 134: 755: 7: 909:"NSW Evidence Act 1995 section 126A" 58:adding citations to reliable sources 25: 816:Australian Law Reform Commission 580:patient came to a doctor with a 34: 534:is a legal concept, related to 45:needs additional citations for 661:. It may also be invoked in a 604:attorney–client communications 1: 860:Evidence Act 1995 No 25 s126K 69:"Physician–patient privilege" 582:sexually transmitted disease 427:Declaration against interest 295:Self-authenticating document 689:Doctor–patient relationship 570:doctor–patient relationship 532:Physician–patient privilege 18:Physician-patient privilege 967: 896:NSW Evidence Act 1995 s131 872:NSW Evidence Act 1995 s127 836:NSW Evidence Act 1995 s117 636:New South Wales, Australia 618:In the United States, the 709:Subpoena ad testificandum 699:Priest–penitent privilege 684:Attorney–client privilege 620:Federal Rules of Evidence 608:driving while intoxicated 305:Hague Evidence Convention 194:Eyewitness identification 941:Privileged communication 782:www.gencourt.state.nh.us 432:Present sense impression 242:Public policy exclusions 536:medical confidentiality 884:Evidence Act 1995 s129 209:Consciousness of guilt 848:NSW Evidence Act 1995 576:For example, a below- 573:incorrect diagnosis. 358:Recorded recollection 704:Subpoena duces tecum 679:Privilege (evidence) 392:in United States law 54:improve this article 597:Highway Traffic Act 232:Laying a foundation 488:trusts and estates 368:Dead Man's Statute 333:Direct examination 290:Best evidence rule 743:www.mto.gov.on.ca 544:rules of evidence 529: 528: 449:Implied assertion 412:Dying declaration 407:Excited utterance 353:Proffer agreement 338:Cross-examination 151:Types of evidence 130: 129: 122: 104: 16:(Redirected from 958: 920: 919: 917: 915: 905: 899: 893: 887: 881: 875: 869: 863: 857: 851: 845: 839: 833: 827: 826: 824: 823: 818:. 17 August 2010 808: 802: 799: 793: 792: 790: 788: 774: 768: 767: 761: 753: 751: 749: 734: 728: 725: 649:, some victims, 521: 514: 507: 444:Learned treatise 422:Ancient document 402:Business records 300:Ancient document 280:Chain of custody 132: 125: 118: 114: 111: 105: 103: 62: 38: 30: 21: 966: 965: 961: 960: 959: 957: 956: 955: 926: 925: 924: 923: 913: 911: 907: 906: 902: 894: 890: 882: 878: 870: 866: 858: 854: 846: 842: 834: 830: 821: 819: 810: 809: 805: 800: 796: 786: 784: 776: 775: 771: 754: 747: 745: 736: 735: 731: 726: 722: 717: 694:Medical privacy 675: 663:public interest 632: 616: 593:Ontario, Canada 557: 525: 417:Party admission 285:Judicial notice 227:Burden of proof 169:Real (physical) 126: 115: 109: 106: 63: 61: 51: 39: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 964: 962: 954: 953: 948: 943: 938: 928: 927: 922: 921: 900: 888: 876: 864: 852: 840: 828: 803: 794: 769: 729: 719: 718: 716: 713: 712: 711: 706: 701: 696: 691: 686: 681: 674: 671: 631: 628: 615: 612: 586:statutory rape 578:age of consent 556: 553: 527: 526: 524: 523: 516: 509: 501: 498: 497: 496: 495: 490: 481: 476: 471: 463: 462: 454: 453: 452: 451: 446: 441: 434: 429: 424: 419: 414: 409: 404: 399: 394: 389: 387:in English law 381: 380: 379:and exceptions 373: 372: 371: 370: 365: 363:Expert witness 360: 355: 350: 345: 340: 335: 330: 325: 317: 316: 310: 309: 308: 307: 302: 297: 292: 287: 282: 274: 273: 271:Authentication 267: 266: 265: 264: 259: 254: 249: 244: 239: 234: 229: 221: 220: 214: 213: 212: 211: 206: 201: 196: 191: 186: 181: 176: 171: 166: 161: 153: 152: 148: 147: 139: 138: 128: 127: 42: 40: 33: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 963: 952: 949: 947: 944: 942: 939: 937: 934: 933: 931: 910: 904: 901: 897: 892: 889: 885: 880: 877: 873: 868: 865: 861: 856: 853: 849: 844: 841: 837: 832: 829: 817: 813: 807: 804: 798: 795: 783: 779: 773: 770: 765: 759: 744: 740: 733: 730: 724: 721: 714: 710: 707: 705: 702: 700: 697: 695: 692: 690: 687: 685: 682: 680: 677: 676: 672: 670: 668: 664: 660: 656: 652: 648: 643: 641: 637: 629: 627: 623: 621: 614:United States 613: 611: 609: 605: 600: 598: 594: 589: 587: 583: 579: 574: 571: 566: 563: 554: 552: 549: 545: 541: 537: 533: 522: 517: 515: 510: 508: 503: 502: 500: 499: 494: 491: 489: 485: 482: 480: 477: 475: 472: 470: 467: 466: 465: 464: 460: 455: 450: 447: 445: 442: 440: 439: 435: 433: 430: 428: 425: 423: 420: 418: 415: 413: 410: 408: 405: 403: 400: 398: 395: 393: 390: 388: 385: 384: 383: 382: 378: 374: 369: 366: 364: 361: 359: 356: 354: 351: 349: 346: 344: 341: 339: 336: 334: 331: 329: 326: 324: 321: 320: 319: 318: 315: 311: 306: 303: 301: 298: 296: 293: 291: 288: 286: 283: 281: 278: 277: 276: 275: 272: 268: 263: 260: 258: 255: 253: 250: 248: 245: 243: 240: 238: 235: 233: 230: 228: 225: 224: 223: 222: 219: 215: 210: 207: 205: 202: 200: 199:Genetic (DNA) 197: 195: 192: 190: 189:Demonstrative 187: 185: 182: 180: 177: 175: 172: 170: 167: 165: 162: 160: 157: 156: 155: 154: 149: 145: 141: 140: 137: 133: 124: 121: 113: 102: 99: 95: 92: 88: 85: 81: 78: 74: 71: –  70: 66: 65:Find sources: 59: 55: 49: 48: 43:This article 41: 37: 32: 31: 19: 912:. Retrieved 903: 891: 879: 867: 855: 843: 831: 820:. Retrieved 815: 806: 797: 785:. Retrieved 781: 772: 746:. Retrieved 742: 732: 723: 644: 639: 633: 624: 617: 601: 590: 575: 567: 558: 531: 530: 493:Criminal law 436: 262:Similar fact 142:Part of the 116: 107: 97: 90: 83: 76: 64: 52:Please help 47:verification 44: 655:shield laws 651:journalists 591:The law in 397:Confessions 348:Impeachment 237:Materiality 184:Inculpatory 179:Exculpatory 164:Documentary 951:Physicians 936:Health law 930:Categories 822:2020-06-17 715:References 667:privileged 548:common law 459:common law 438:Res gestae 323:Competence 247:Spoliation 80:newspapers 630:Australia 562:defendant 328:Privilege 314:Witnesses 252:Character 218:Relevance 159:Testimony 110:June 2013 758:cite web 673:See also 546:in many 479:Property 469:Contract 343:Redirect 136:Evidence 946:Patient 659:priests 657:), and 647:lawyers 377:Hearsay 174:Digital 94:scholar 540:doctor 457:Other 146:series 96:  89:  82:  75:  67:  914:3 May 787:3 May 748:3 May 555:Scope 484:Wills 461:areas 257:Habit 101:JSTOR 87:books 916:2018 789:2018 764:link 750:2018 474:Tort 204:Lies 73:news 634:In 144:law 56:by 932:: 814:. 780:. 760:}} 756:{{ 741:. 669:. 610:. 599:. 486:, 918:. 898:. 886:. 874:. 862:. 850:. 838:. 825:. 791:. 766:) 752:. 653:( 640:. 520:e 513:t 506:v 123:) 117:( 112:) 108:( 98:· 91:· 84:· 77:· 50:. 20:)

Index

Physician-patient privilege

verification
improve this article
adding citations to reliable sources
"Physician–patient privilege"
news
newspapers
books
scholar
JSTOR
Learn how and when to remove this message
Evidence
law
Testimony
Documentary
Real (physical)
Digital
Exculpatory
Inculpatory
Demonstrative
Eyewitness identification
Genetic (DNA)
Lies
Consciousness of guilt
Relevance
Burden of proof
Laying a foundation
Materiality
Public policy exclusions

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.