917:
20:
325:
to fully support a standard that would allow their customers to leave for other products. With
Monterey, two of the key partners already had a niche they expected to continue to serve in the future: POWER and IA-64 for IBM, IA-32 and IA-64 for SCO.
316:
With the exception of the IA-64 port and Dynix MP improvements, much of the
Monterey effort was an attempt to standardize existing versions of Unix into a single compatible system. Such efforts had been undertaken in the past (e.g.,
287:(Itanium Architecture) CPU platform, which was yet to be released at that time. The focus of the project was to create an enterprise-class UNIX for IA-64, which at the time was expected to eventually dominate the UNIX server market.
309:
In May 2001, the project announced the availability of a beta test version AIX-5L for IA-64, basically meeting its original primary goal. However, Intel had missed its delivery date for its first
290:
By March 2001, however, "the explosion in popularity of Linux ... prompted IBM to quietly ditch" this; all involved attempted to find a niche in the rapidly developing
216:
974:
580:
302:. In the same year, IBM eventually declared Monterey dead. Intel, IBM, Caldera Systems, and others had also been running a parallel effort to port Linux to IA-64,
959:
431:
209:
969:
573:
44:
765:
294:
market and moved their focus away from
Monterey. Sequent was acquired by IBM in 1999. In 2000, SCO's UNIX business was purchased by
49:
202:
944:
720:
964:
920:
566:
939:
715:
661:
280:
248:
548:
829:
770:
725:
619:
306:, which delivered workable code in February 2000. In late 2000, IBM announced a major effort to support Linux.
268:
330:
78:
30:
949:
760:
671:
666:
656:
609:
85:
954:
852:
678:
407:
614:
260:
256:
441:
633:
629:
384:
710:
641:
276:
358:
883:
780:
589:
494:
303:
240:
236:
552:
295:
142:
745:
322:
99:
462:
933:
839:
750:
601:
92:
904:
873:
688:
490:
427:
173:
152:
147:
784:
730:
239:
that ran across a variety of 32-bit and 64-bit platforms, as well as supporting
179:
521:
19:
797:
334:
71:
824:
299:
116:
54:
558:
321:) and had generally failed, as the companies involved were too reliant on
868:
792:
755:
814:
740:
651:
646:
499:
436:
310:
252:
185:
329:
The breakdown of
Project Monterey was one of the factors leading to a
847:
698:
683:
190:
126:
432:"More Evidence Project Monterey Partners Knew Linux Was the Future"
809:
802:
735:
412:
291:
284:
272:
264:
243:. Announced in October 1998, several Unix vendors were involved;
18:
495:"2002 IBM Internal Email on Project Monterey - "No One Wants It""
313:
processor by two years, and the
Monterey software had no market.
819:
703:
233:
562:
340:
IBM sold only 32 Monterey licenses in 2001, and fewer in 2002.
888:
693:
593:
318:
244:
121:
383:
Hughes-Rowlands, Richard; Chibib, Ahmed (August 31, 1999).
298:, a Linux distributor, who later renamed themselves the
897:
861:
838:
779:
628:
600:
283:development funding for porting to their upcoming
271:added multi-processing (MP) support from their
574:
210:
8:
463:"IBM to spend $ 1 billion on Linux in 2001"
581:
567:
559:
217:
203:
26:
349:
160:
134:
108:
62:
36:
29:
975:Computer-related introductions in 1998
485:
483:
408:"Caldera loads Linux apps on UnixWare"
357:Jaikumar Vijayan (February 1, 1999).
7:
359:"Sequent Sketches UNIX/NT Road Map"
337:over their contributions to Linux.
549:Project Monterey Developer Program
14:
232:was an attempt to build a single
916:
915:
522:"SCO vs. Linux: 32 mal Monterey"
520:Borchers, Detlef (2005-08-28).
960:Discontinued operating systems
1:
555: (archived 20 April 2001)
50:SCO–SGI code dispute of 2003
970:Power ISA operating systems
991:
913:
23:Logo for Project Monterey
830:Red Hat Enterprise Linux
771:Red Hat Enterprise Linux
620:Red Hat Enterprise Linux
31:SCO–Linux disputes
279:provided expertise and
945:Collaborative projects
667:DOS/360 and successors
86:SCO v. DaimlerChrysler
24:
965:IBM operating systems
679:OS/360 and successors
22:
261:Santa Cruz Operation
135:Individuals involved
16:1990s Unix coalition
493:(August 25, 2005).
940:Parallel computing
430:(April 25, 2005).
385:"Project Monterey"
335:SCO Group sued IBM
109:Companies involved
25:
927:
926:
590:Operating systems
277:Intel Corporation
227:
226:
982:
919:
918:
583:
576:
569:
560:
536:
535:
533:
532:
517:
511:
510:
508:
507:
487:
478:
477:
475:
474:
459:
453:
452:
450:
449:
440:. Archived from
424:
418:
417:
404:
398:
397:
395:
394:
389:
380:
374:
373:
371:
370:
354:
304:Project Trillian
241:multi-processing
237:operating system
230:Project Monterey
219:
212:
205:
169:Project Monterey
27:
990:
989:
985:
984:
983:
981:
980:
979:
930:
929:
928:
923:
909:
893:
857:
834:
775:
624:
596:
587:
553:Wayback Machine
545:
540:
539:
530:
528:
519:
518:
514:
505:
503:
489:
488:
481:
472:
470:
461:
460:
456:
447:
445:
444:on June 7, 2007
426:
425:
421:
406:
405:
401:
392:
390:
387:
382:
381:
377:
368:
366:
356:
355:
351:
346:
333:in 2003, where
296:Caldera Systems
263:(SCO) provided
223:
143:Ralph Yarro III
79:SCO v. AutoZone
17:
12:
11:
5:
988:
986:
978:
977:
972:
967:
962:
957:
952:
947:
942:
932:
931:
925:
924:
914:
911:
910:
908:
907:
901:
899:
895:
894:
892:
891:
886:
881:
876:
871:
865:
863:
859:
858:
856:
855:
850:
844:
842:
836:
835:
833:
832:
827:
822:
817:
812:
807:
806:
805:
795:
789:
787:
777:
776:
774:
773:
768:
763:
758:
753:
748:
743:
738:
733:
728:
723:
718:
713:
708:
707:
706:
701:
696:
691:
686:
676:
675:
674:
664:
659:
654:
649:
644:
638:
636:
626:
625:
623:
622:
617:
612:
606:
604:
598:
597:
588:
586:
585:
578:
571:
563:
557:
556:
544:
543:External links
541:
538:
537:
512:
479:
454:
419:
399:
375:
348:
347:
345:
342:
323:vendor lock-in
225:
224:
222:
221:
214:
207:
199:
196:
195:
194:
193:
188:
183:
176:
171:
163:
162:
158:
157:
156:
155:
150:
145:
137:
136:
132:
131:
130:
129:
124:
119:
111:
110:
106:
105:
104:
103:
100:Red Hat v. SCO
96:
89:
82:
75:
65:
64:
60:
59:
58:
57:
52:
47:
39:
38:
34:
33:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
987:
976:
973:
971:
968:
966:
963:
961:
958:
956:
953:
951:
950:Unix variants
948:
946:
943:
941:
938:
937:
935:
922:
912:
906:
903:
902:
900:
896:
890:
887:
885:
882:
880:
877:
875:
872:
870:
867:
866:
864:
860:
854:
851:
849:
846:
845:
843:
841:
840:Point of sale
837:
831:
828:
826:
823:
821:
818:
816:
813:
811:
808:
804:
801:
800:
799:
796:
794:
791:
790:
788:
786:
782:
778:
772:
769:
767:
764:
762:
759:
757:
754:
752:
749:
747:
744:
742:
739:
737:
734:
732:
729:
727:
724:
722:
719:
717:
714:
712:
709:
705:
702:
700:
697:
695:
692:
690:
687:
685:
682:
681:
680:
677:
673:
670:
669:
668:
665:
663:
660:
658:
655:
653:
650:
648:
645:
643:
640:
639:
637:
635:
631:
627:
621:
618:
616:
613:
611:
608:
607:
605:
603:
602:Supercomputer
599:
595:
591:
584:
579:
577:
572:
570:
565:
564:
561:
554:
550:
547:
546:
542:
527:
523:
516:
513:
502:
501:
496:
492:
491:Jones, Pamela
486:
484:
480:
468:
467:CNET News.com
464:
458:
455:
443:
439:
438:
433:
429:
428:Jones, Pamela
423:
420:
415:
414:
409:
403:
400:
386:
379:
376:
364:
363:Computerworld
360:
353:
350:
343:
341:
338:
336:
332:
327:
324:
320:
314:
312:
307:
305:
301:
297:
293:
288:
286:
282:
278:
274:
270:
267:support, and
266:
262:
258:
255:support from
254:
250:
246:
242:
238:
235:
231:
220:
215:
213:
208:
206:
201:
200:
198:
197:
192:
189:
187:
184:
182:
181:
177:
175:
172:
170:
167:
166:
165:
164:
159:
154:
151:
149:
146:
144:
141:
140:
139:
138:
133:
128:
125:
123:
120:
118:
115:
114:
113:
112:
107:
102:
101:
97:
95:
94:
93:SCO v. Novell
90:
88:
87:
83:
81:
80:
76:
74:
73:
69:
68:
67:
66:
61:
56:
53:
51:
48:
46:
43:
42:
41:
40:
35:
32:
28:
21:
955:Unix history
905:Fedora Linux
878:
874:Workplace OS
731:System/88 OS
529:. Retrieved
526:Heise Online
525:
515:
504:. Retrieved
498:
471:. Retrieved
469:. 2000-12-12
466:
457:
446:. Retrieved
442:the original
435:
422:
411:
402:
391:. Retrieved
378:
367:. Retrieved
365:. p. 28
362:
352:
339:
328:
315:
308:
289:
229:
228:
178:
174:United Linux
168:
153:Darl McBride
148:Pamela Jones
98:
91:
84:
77:
70:
785:workstation
180:USL v. BSDi
934:Categories
531:2007-05-20
506:2007-05-20
473:2008-08-19
448:2007-05-20
393:2020-09-29
369:2020-09-29
344:References
72:SCO v. IBM
63:Litigation
634:mainframe
300:SCO Group
273:DYNIX/ptx
247:provided
117:SCO Group
55:SCOsource
921:Category
884:Trillian
879:Monterey
869:Taligent
862:Projects
793:Textpack
275:system.
45:Timeline
37:Overview
898:Related
853:4690 OS
848:4680 OS
781:Desktop
711:VM line
657:TSS/360
652:TOS/360
647:BOS/360
551:at the
500:Groklaw
437:Groklaw
331:lawsuit
311:Itanium
269:Sequent
253:PowerPC
186:Groklaw
798:PC DOS
746:zLinux
699:OS/390
684:OS/VS1
630:Server
191:Xinuos
127:Novell
810:PC/IX
803:DOS/V
766:SRTOS
736:IBM i
642:IBSYS
413:ZDNet
388:(PDF)
292:Linux
285:IA-64
265:IA-32
249:POWER
161:Other
820:OS/2
756:DPPX
751:DPCX
704:z/OS
251:and
234:Unix
889:K42
825:AOS
815:AIX
761:SSP
741:AIX
726:CPF
721:TPF
716:ACP
694:MVS
689:SVS
672:VSE
662:RAX
615:CNK
610:INK
594:IBM
592:by
319:3DA
281:ISV
257:AIX
245:IBM
122:IBM
936::
783:,
632:,
524:.
497:.
482:^
465:.
434:.
410:.
361:.
259:,
582:e
575:t
568:v
534:.
509:.
476:.
451:.
416:.
396:.
372:.
218:e
211:t
204:v
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
