Knowledge (XXG)

Prout's hypothesis

Source 📝

328:'s principal character, the physicist Viktor Shtrum, reflects on Prout's hypothesis about hydrogen being the origin of other elements (and the felicitous fact that Prout's incorrect data led to an essentially correct conclusion), as he worries about his inability to formulate his own thesis. 213:
times the mass of a hydrogen atom, with an error always less than 1%. This is a near miss to Prout's law being correct. Nevertheless, the rule was not found to predict isotope masses better than this for all isotopes, due mostly to mass defects resulting from release of
64:
when he succeeded in "knocking" hydrogen nuclei out of nitrogen atoms with alpha particles in 1917, and thus concluded that perhaps the nuclei of all elements were made of such particles (the hydrogen nucleus), which in 1920 he suggested be named
159:
claim that the basic unit was one-half of a hydrogen atom, but further discrepancies surfaced. This resulted in the hypothesis that one-quarter of a hydrogen atom was the common unit. Although they turned out to be wrong, these conjectures
111:
The discrepancy between Prout's hypothesis and the known variation of some atomic weights to values far from integral multiples of hydrogen, was explained between 1913 and 1932 by the discovery of
388:) accepted Rutherford's suggestion that the hydrogen nucleus be named the "proton," following Prout's word "protyle." Also cf. official report of this meeting, A.S. Eddington, 1920 287:
atoms (which have among the highest binding-energies) weigh only about 99.1% as much as 56 hydrogen atoms. The missing 0.9% of mass represents the energy lost when the nucleus of
430:
William Prout (1816). Correction of a mistake in the essay on the relation between the specific gravities of bodies in their gaseous state and the weights of their atoms.
373: 187:
with sufficient resolution to show that the two isotopic masses are very close to the integers 20 and 22, and that neither is equal to the known molar mass (20.2) of
283:(u), plus or minus binding energy discrepancy – atomic mass unit being the modern approximation for "mass of a proton, neutron, or hydrogen atom". For example 139:
Prout's hypothesis remained influential in chemistry throughout the 1820s. However, more careful measurements of the atomic weights, such as those compiled by
202:, in proportions such that the average weight of natural chlorine was about 35.45 times that of hydrogen. For all elements, each individual isotope of 702: 488: 463: 412:
William Prout (1815). On the relation between the specific gravities of bodies in their gaseous state and the weights of their atoms.
20: 697: 252:
is equal to sum of the masses of its constituent protons and neutrons, minus the mass of the nuclear binding energy, the
503: 74: 49:
that had been measured for the elements known at that time appeared to be whole multiples of the atomic weight of
707: 305: 717: 712: 73:
for particles, added to the stem of Prout's word "protyle". The assumption as discussed by Rutherford was of a
292: 144: 518:"The Separation of Chlorine into Isotopes (Isotopic Elements) and the Whole Number Rule for Atomic Weights" 176: 53:. He then hypothesized that the hydrogen atom was the only truly fundamental object, which he called 655: 618: 589: 529: 414: 85:
somehow trapped within thereby reducing the positive charge to +Z as observed and vaguely explaining
57:, and that the atoms of other elements were actually groupings of various numbers of hydrogen atoms. 381: 634: 310: 385: 557: 484: 459: 257: 180: 120: 97: 93: 89: 61: 663: 626: 597: 547: 537: 280: 30: 155:, could not at the time be explained in terms of Prout's hypothesis. Some came up with the 325: 140: 682: 659: 622: 593: 533: 552: 517: 337: 246: 226: 219: 215: 105: 691: 447: 314: 261: 238: 168: 124: 46: 42: 390:
Report of the 88th meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science
638: 435: 229:
of hydrogen into higher elements, it is now understood that atoms consist of both
452: 265: 253: 203: 199: 128: 92:. Such a nuclear constitution was known to be inconsistent with dynamics either 237:. The modern version of Prout's rule is that the atomic mass of an isotope of 86: 171:
was by 1919 suspected to be the result of the natural occurrence of multiple
419: 161: 561: 542: 29:
was an early 19th-century attempt to explain the existence of the various
195: 152: 148: 82: 50: 147:
in 1832, disproved the hypothesis. In particular, the atomic weight of
646:
Siegfried, Robert (1956). "The Chemical Basis for Prout's Hypothesis".
377: 284: 234: 172: 116: 112: 101: 38: 667: 601: 630: 230: 156: 78: 66: 179:
discovered multiple stable isotopes for numerous elements using a
288: 188: 184: 34: 313:
talks about turning elements into other elements of decreasing
33:
through a hypothesis regarding the internal structure of the
104:
hypothesis by Rutherford and discovery by English physicist
16:
Early model of the atom that did not account for mass defect
264:, the mass of an isotope is roughly, but not exactly, its 580:
Gladstone, Samuel (1947). "William Prout (1785-1850)".
481:
The Oxford Companion to the History of Modern Science
131:
of individual isotopes, with an error of at most 1%.
45:published two papers in which he observed that the 609:Benfey, O. Theodore (1952). "Prout's Hypothesis". 451: 374:British Association for the Advancement of Science 361:In a footnote to a 1921 paper by O. Masson in the 209:was eventually found to have a mass very close to 198:was found to be composed of the isotopes Cl and 8: 683:The Semiempirical Formula for Atomic Masses 506:Francis W. Aston, Nobel prize lecture 1922 483:. Oxford University Press. pp. 683–. 291:was made from hydrogen inside a star (see 551: 541: 225:Although all elements are the product of 372:281, 1921) Rutherford describes how the 405: 380:meeting beginning August 24, 1920 (see 354: 164:further measurement of atomic weights. 60:Prout's hypothesis was an influence on 479:John L. Heilbron (14 February 2003). 7: 127:, Prout's hypothesis is correct for 317:, until a gray matter is reached. 14: 703:Discoverers of chemical elements 100:but seemed inevitable until the 151:, which is 35.45 times that of 21:Progressive Utilization Theory 1: 648:Journal of Chemical Education 611:Journal of Chemical Education 582:Journal of Chemical Education 522:Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 392:(John Murray: London) p. 34. 734: 18: 504:Mass spectra and isotopes 306:The Doings of Raffles Haw 194:By 1925, the problematic 183:. In 1919, Aston studied 37:. In 1815 and 1816, the 77:consisting of Z + N = A 19:Not to be confused with 293:stellar nucleosynthesis 167:The discrepancy in the 543:10.1073/pnas.11.10.624 363:Philosophical Magazine 233:(hydrogen nuclei) and 222:when they are formed. 175:of the same element. 698:History of chemistry 432:Annals of Philosophy 418:, 6: 321–330. 415:Annals of Philosophy 660:1956JChEd..33..263S 623:1952JChEd..29...78B 594:1947JChEd..24..478G 534:1925PNAS...11..624H 516:Harkins WD (1925). 434:, 7: 111–13. 256:. According to the 119:. According to the 320:In his 1959 novel 311:Arthur Conan Doyle 303:In his 1891 novel 299:Literary allusions 69:, from the suffix 27:Prout's hypothesis 668:10.1021/ed033p263 602:10.1021/ed024p478 490:978-0-19-974376-6 465:978-0-385-31211-0 258:whole number rule 181:mass spectrograph 121:whole number rule 62:Ernest Rutherford 31:chemical elements 725: 708:1810s in science 671: 642: 631:10.1021/ed029p78 605: 566: 565: 555: 545: 513: 507: 501: 495: 494: 476: 470: 469: 457: 454:The God Particle 444: 438: 428: 422: 410: 393: 359: 281:atomic mass unit 241:(atomic number) 72: 733: 732: 728: 727: 726: 724: 723: 722: 718:1816 in science 713:1815 in science 688: 687: 679: 674: 645: 608: 588:(10): 478–481. 579: 575: 573:Further reading 570: 569: 515: 514: 510: 502: 498: 491: 478: 477: 473: 466: 446: 445: 441: 429: 425: 411: 407: 397: 396: 360: 356: 346: 334: 326:Vasily Grossman 301: 141:Jacob Berzelius 137: 70: 24: 17: 12: 11: 5: 731: 729: 721: 720: 715: 710: 705: 700: 690: 689: 686: 685: 678: 677:External links 675: 673: 672: 654:(6): 263–266. 643: 606: 576: 574: 571: 568: 567: 508: 496: 489: 471: 464: 448:Lederman, Leon 439: 436:Online reprint 423: 420:Online reprint 404: 403: 395: 394: 382:meeting report 353: 352: 345: 342: 341: 340: 338:Binding energy 333: 330: 300: 297: 247:neutron number 227:nuclear fusion 216:binding energy 169:atomic weights 136: 133: 106:James Chadwick 47:atomic weights 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 730: 719: 716: 714: 711: 709: 706: 704: 701: 699: 696: 695: 693: 684: 681: 680: 676: 669: 665: 661: 657: 653: 649: 644: 640: 636: 632: 628: 624: 620: 616: 612: 607: 603: 599: 595: 591: 587: 583: 578: 577: 572: 563: 559: 554: 549: 544: 539: 535: 531: 528:(10): 624–8. 527: 523: 519: 512: 509: 505: 500: 497: 492: 486: 482: 475: 472: 467: 461: 456: 455: 449: 443: 440: 437: 433: 427: 424: 421: 417: 416: 409: 406: 402: 401: 391: 387: 383: 379: 375: 371: 368: 364: 358: 355: 351: 350: 343: 339: 336: 335: 331: 329: 327: 323: 322:Life and Fate 318: 316: 315:atomic number 312: 308: 307: 298: 296: 294: 290: 286: 282: 278: 275: +  274: 270: 267: 263: 262:Francis Aston 259: 255: 251: 248: 244: 240: 239:proton number 236: 232: 228: 223: 221: 220:atomic nuclei 217: 212: 208: 205: 201: 197: 192: 190: 186: 182: 178: 174: 170: 165: 163: 158: 154: 150: 146: 145:Edward Turner 142: 134: 132: 130: 129:atomic masses 126: 125:Francis Aston 122: 118: 114: 109: 107: 103: 99: 95: 91: 90:radioactivity 88: 84: 80: 76: 68: 63: 58: 56: 52: 48: 44: 43:William Prout 40: 36: 32: 28: 22: 651: 647: 617:(2): 78–81. 614: 610: 585: 581: 525: 521: 511: 499: 480: 474: 453: 442: 431: 426: 413: 408: 399: 398: 389: 386:announcement 369: 366: 365:(O. Masson, 362: 357: 348: 347: 321: 319: 304: 302: 276: 272: 268: 260:proposed by 249: 242: 224: 210: 206: 193: 166: 138: 110: 59: 54: 26: 25: 279:) times an 266:mass number 254:mass defect 204:mass number 177:F. W. Aston 143:in 1828 or 692:Categories 367:Phil. Mag. 344:References 87:beta decay 458:. Delta. 400:Citations 349:Footnotes 162:catalyzed 135:Influence 96:or early 94:classical 83:electrons 562:16587053 450:(1993). 332:See also 235:neutrons 196:chlorine 173:isotopes 153:hydrogen 149:chlorine 115:and the 113:isotopes 51:hydrogen 41:chemist 23:(PROUT). 656:Bibcode 639:4066298 619:Bibcode 590:Bibcode 553:1086175 530:Bibcode 378:Cardiff 376:at its 285:iron-56 231:protons 117:neutron 102:neutron 98:quantum 81:plus N 79:protons 75:nucleus 67:protons 55:protyle 39:English 637:  560:  550:  487:  462:  157:ad hoc 635:S2CID 191:gas. 71:"-on" 558:PMID 485:ISBN 460:ISBN 384:and 289:iron 245:and 189:neon 185:neon 35:atom 664:doi 627:doi 598:doi 548:PMC 538:doi 370:41, 295:). 218:in 123:of 694:: 662:. 652:33 650:. 633:. 625:. 615:29 613:. 596:. 586:24 584:. 556:. 546:. 536:. 526:11 524:. 520:. 324:, 309:, 200:Cl 108:. 670:. 666:: 658:: 641:. 629:: 621:: 604:. 600:: 592:: 564:. 540:: 532:: 493:. 468:. 277:N 273:Z 271:( 269:A 250:N 243:Z 211:A 207:A

Index

Progressive Utilization Theory
chemical elements
atom
English
William Prout
atomic weights
hydrogen
Ernest Rutherford
protons
nucleus
protons
electrons
beta decay
radioactivity
classical
quantum
neutron
James Chadwick
isotopes
neutron
whole number rule
Francis Aston
atomic masses
Jacob Berzelius
Edward Turner
chlorine
hydrogen
ad hoc
catalyzed
atomic weights

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.