Knowledge (XXG)

Rubric (academic)

Source 📝

128:
commitment strength, and acceptance. Transformative learning results in changing from one mode to the next. The typical developmental modes can be roughly identified as beginning, exploring, sustaining, and inspiring. The timing of the four levels is unique to each dimension and it is common to find beginning or exploring modes in one dimension coexisting with sustaining or inspiring modes in another. Often, the modes within a dimension are given unique names in addition to the typical identifier. As a result, developmental rubrics have four properties:
30:
is a "scoring guide used to evaluate the quality of students' constructed responses" according to James Popham. In simpler terms, it serves as a set of criteria for grading assignments. Typically presented in table format, rubrics contain evaluative criteria, quality definitions for various levels of
109:
Scoring rubrics find application in individual assessments, projects, and capstone projects. They prove particularly beneficial when multiple evaluators are assessing to maintain focus on contributing attributes. Rubrics are ideal for project assessments, providing criteria for various components.
174:
The term "rubric" traditionally referred to instructions on a test or a heading on a document. In modern education, it has evolved to denote an assessment tool linked to learning objectives. The transition from medicine to education occurred through the construction of "Standardized Developmental
161:
Fourth, instructors of particular courses share the developmental rubrics with students and identify the target modes of practice for the course. Typically, a course targets only a fraction of the dimensions of the community's developmental rubrics and only one mode of practice within each of the
127:
Developmental rubrics refer to a matrix of modes of practice. Practices belong to a community of experts. Each mode of practice competes with a few others within the same dimension. Modes appear in succession because their frequency is determined by four parameters: endemicity, performance rate,
154:
Next, each practitioner works with an expert developmental interviewer to create a matrix that best reflects their experiences. Once several interviews have been completed they can be combined within a single set of developmental rubrics for the community through individual or computerized text
60:
Rubrics can be classified as holistic, analytic, or developmental. Holistic rubrics provide an overall rating for a piece of work, considering all aspects. Analytic rubrics evaluate various dimensions or components separately. Developmental rubrics, a subset of analytical rubrics, facilitate
118:
Developmental rubrics, a subtype of analytic rubrics, utilize multiple dimensions of developmental successions for assessment, instructional design, and transformative learning. They define modes of practice within a community of experts and indicate transformative learning through dynamic
353: 39:
A scoring rubric typically includes dimensions or "criteria" on which performance is rated, definitions and examples illustrating measured attributes, and a rating scale for each dimension. Joan Herman, Aschbacher, and Winters identify these elements in scoring rubrics:
165:
Finally, the rubrics are used real-time to motivate student development, usually focusing on one dimension at a time and discussing the opportunities to perform at the next mode of practice in succession.
183:
Scoring rubrics enhance scoring consistency, providing educators with a reliable grading tool. Grading is more consistent when using a rubric, reducing variation between students and different teachers.
158:
Third, the community of experts rate learner performances and meet to compare ratings of the same performances and revise the definitions when multiple interpretations are discovered.
456: 151:
Since practices belong to a community, the first step is to locate a group of practitioners, who are expert in their field and experienced with learners.
135:
They contain multiple dimensions each consisting of a few modes of practice that cannot be used simultaneously with other modes in the dimension.
363: 31:
achievement, and a scoring strategy. They play a dual role for teachers in marking assignments and for students in planning their work.
385:
Wenger, E., McDermott, R. & Snyder, W. M. (2002). "Cultivating Communities of Practice." Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
327: 416:
University of Minnesota, Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition (CARLA), Virtual Assessment Center: Creating Rubrics
441: 269:
Dawson, Phillip (December 2015). "Assessment rubrics: towards clearer and more replicable design, research and practice".
410:
Introduction to Rubrics: An Assessment Tool to Save Grading Time, Convey Effective Feedback, and Promote Student Learning
61:
assessment, instructional design, and transformative learning through multiple dimensions of developmental successions.
451: 217: 20: 278: 223: 211: 205: 196: – Measurement of "intellectual accomplishments that are worthwhile, significant, and meaningful" 193: 283: 355:
Teachers, Learners, Modes of Practice: Theory and methodology for identifying knowledge development
296: 415: 446: 359: 323: 199: 288: 435: 398: 316: 300: 82:
Collaboratively list criteria for the scoring rubric, incorporating student feedback.
342:
Goodrich, H. (1996). "Understanding Rubrics." Educational Leadership, 54 (4), 14-18.
52:- Standards of excellence for specified performance levels with models or examples 292: 94:
Allow students to apply rubrics to sample assignments for a deeper understanding.
420:
Winter H., (2002). Using test results for assessment of teaching and learning.
138:
The modes of practice within a dimension show a dynamic succession of levels.
69:
To create an effective scoring rubric, a five-step method is often employed:
43:- Traits or dimensions serving as the basis for judging the student response 88:
Define hierarchical categories describing levels of quality or development.
76:
Provide students with sample assignments of varying quality for analysis.
214: – Use of technology in education to improve learning and teaching 141:
They can be created for extremely diverse scales of times & places.
226: – Use of technology tools in general content areas in education 19:
This article is about rubrics in academic sense. For other uses, see
247: 175:
Ratings" in the mid-1970s, later adapted for writing assessment.
46:- Definitions and examples clarifying each trait or dimension 403: 322:. Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development. 100:
Introduce self and peer-assessment to reinforce learning.
315: 248:"What's Wrong - and What's Right - with Rubrics" 399:Grading writing: Recommended grading strategies 271:Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 220: – Assessment based on specified standards 132:They are descriptions of examples of behaviors. 358:. New York, New York: Routledge. p. 328. 49:- A scale of values for rating each dimension 241: 239: 8: 408:Stevens, D. & Levi, Antonia J. (2013). 318:A Practical Guide to Alternative Assessment 282: 404:Utah Education Network Rubric Resources 235: 208: – Educational evaluation method 7: 412:. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing. 14: 457:Student assessment and evaluation 202: – Knowledge assessment tool 65:Steps to create a scoring rubric 26:In the realm of US education, a 246:Popham, James (October 1997). 146:Creating developmental rubrics 123:Defining developmental rubrics 35:Components of a scoring rubric 1: 422:Chem Eng Education 36:188–190 314:Herman, Joan (January 1992). 293:10.1080/02602938.2015.1111294 16:Scoring guide for assessment 352:Dirlam, David Kirk (2017). 105:When to use scoring rubrics 473: 218:Standards-based assessment 18: 98:Self and Peer Assessment: 21:Rubric (disambiguation) 442:Educational technology 252:Educational Leadership 224:Technology integration 212:Educational technology 206:Educational assessment 170:Etymology and history 114:Developmental rubrics 194:Authentic assessment 92:Practice on Models: 86:Quality Gradations: 452:Evaluation methods 162:target dimensions. 397:Flash, P. (2009) 365:978-1-138-64118-1 200:Concept inventory 179:Technical aspects 80:Criteria Listing: 464: 386: 383: 377: 376: 374: 372: 349: 343: 340: 334: 333: 321: 311: 305: 304: 286: 266: 260: 259: 243: 472: 471: 467: 466: 465: 463: 462: 461: 432: 431: 430: 394: 392:Further reading 389: 384: 380: 370: 368: 366: 351: 350: 346: 341: 337: 330: 313: 312: 308: 284:10.1.1.703.8431 268: 267: 263: 245: 244: 237: 233: 190: 181: 172: 148: 125: 116: 107: 67: 58: 37: 24: 17: 12: 11: 5: 470: 468: 460: 459: 454: 449: 444: 434: 433: 429: 428:External links 426: 425: 424: 418: 413: 406: 401: 393: 390: 388: 387: 378: 364: 344: 335: 329:978-0871201973 328: 306: 277:(3): 347–360. 261: 234: 232: 229: 228: 227: 221: 215: 209: 203: 197: 189: 186: 180: 177: 171: 168: 167: 166: 163: 159: 156: 152: 147: 144: 143: 142: 139: 136: 133: 124: 121: 115: 112: 106: 103: 102: 101: 95: 89: 83: 77: 66: 63: 57: 54: 36: 33: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 469: 458: 455: 453: 450: 448: 445: 443: 440: 439: 437: 427: 423: 419: 417: 414: 411: 407: 405: 402: 400: 396: 395: 391: 382: 379: 367: 361: 357: 356: 348: 345: 339: 336: 331: 325: 320: 319: 310: 307: 302: 298: 294: 290: 285: 280: 276: 272: 265: 262: 257: 253: 249: 242: 240: 236: 230: 225: 222: 219: 216: 213: 210: 207: 204: 201: 198: 195: 192: 191: 187: 185: 178: 176: 169: 164: 160: 157: 153: 150: 149: 145: 140: 137: 134: 131: 130: 129: 122: 120: 113: 111: 104: 99: 96: 93: 90: 87: 84: 81: 78: 75: 74:Model Review: 72: 71: 70: 64: 62: 55: 53: 50: 47: 44: 41: 34: 32: 29: 22: 421: 409: 381: 369:. Retrieved 354: 347: 338: 317: 309: 274: 270: 264: 255: 251: 182: 173: 126: 119:succession. 117: 108: 97: 91: 85: 79: 73: 68: 59: 51: 48: 45: 42: 38: 27: 25: 258:(2): 72–75. 436:Categories 231:References 301:146330707 279:CiteSeerX 155:analysis. 447:Academia 371:June 20, 188:See also 362:  326:  299:  281:  28:rubric 297:S2CID 56:Types 373:2024 360:ISBN 324:ISBN 289:doi 438:: 295:. 287:. 275:42 273:. 256:55 254:. 250:. 238:^ 375:. 332:. 303:. 291:: 23:.

Index

Rubric (disambiguation)
Authentic assessment
Concept inventory
Educational assessment
Educational technology
Standards-based assessment
Technology integration


"What's Wrong - and What's Right - with Rubrics"
CiteSeerX
10.1.1.703.8431
doi
10.1080/02602938.2015.1111294
S2CID
146330707
A Practical Guide to Alternative Assessment
ISBN
978-0871201973
Teachers, Learners, Modes of Practice: Theory and methodology for identifying knowledge development
ISBN
978-1-138-64118-1
Grading writing: Recommended grading strategies
Utah Education Network Rubric Resources
University of Minnesota, Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition (CARLA), Virtual Assessment Center: Creating Rubrics
Categories
Educational technology
Academia
Evaluation methods
Student assessment and evaluation

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.