39:
209:
principles of the EU and UK be decided by courts under the constitutional law of the United
Kingdom, rendered EU law’s position in the UK determinant not only by the European Communities Act 1972 but also by a number of other constitutional instruments that recognized fundamental principles “of which Parliament when it enacted the
213:
did not either contemplate or authorise the abrogation.” This constrains the applicability of EU law instruments in the UK and blurs the distinction between ‘constitutional’ and’ ordinary’ legislation, in that EU law only has supremacy 'if not derogated in other primary legislation. The judgment also
163:
The
Supreme Court held that the UK has constitutional instruments that the courts would not interpret to be abrogated without close scrutiny. Lord Reed observed that the scrutiny of the legislative process required by the EU directive may amount to an impingement “upon long-established constitutional
208:
Nor could the objections of insufficient judiciary scrutiny be resolved by applying the supremacy of
European Union law forwarded by the Court of Justice of the European Union as the supremacy of European Union law depends on the European Communities Act 1972. That conflict between constitutional
218:
171."Where the legislature has agreed a clearly expressed measure, reflecting the legislators’ choices and compromises in order to achieve agreement, it is not for courts to rewrite the legislation, or extend or ‘improve’ it in respects which the legislator clearly did not
700:"HS2: The First Spike: R (HS2 Action Alliance Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport; R (Heathrow Hub Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport; and R (Hillingdon LBC & Others) v Secretary of State for Transport [2014] UKSC 3"
214:
criticized the
European Court of Justice’s previous case law on the SEA Directive and EIA Directive where the court interpreted the meaning of certain articles beyond what the European Parliament had prescribed. The judgment states:
506:
143:(phase 2). The plaintiffs argued the Directive should be interpreted in line with the Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters 1998 (the
607:
Judges unanimously dismissed claims that the government was failing to comply with the strategic environmental assessment directive, and that the hybrid bill before parliament would breach the environmental impact
653:
494:
454:
151:/92/EU because the party whipped the vote, and limited opportunity to examine the information in Parliament. This was argued to fail the test for proper public participation under
442:
119:
Ltd claimed that the
Secretary of State should have done a strategic environmental assessment under Directive 2001/42 before the government's 'Next Steps' Command Paper on
735:
745:
740:
260:
341:
329:
148:
251:
430:
634:
525:
210:
193:
558:
390:
112:
590:
17:
418:
244:
654:"Mark Elliott: Reflections on the HS2 case: a hierarchy of domestic constitutional norms and the qualified primacy of EU law"
468:
201:
108:
372:
237:
381:
354:
43:
181:
535:
309:
185:
173:
750:
569:
546:
319:
197:
92:
627:
HS2 Action
Alliance Ltd, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor
633: at para. 207, 2 All ER 109, WLR 324, PTSR 182, 1 WLR 324, WLR(D) 28, UKSC 3 (2014),
406:
297:
290:
280:
177:
300:
96:
711:
672:
564:
363:
189:
144:
293:
630:
684:
164:
principles governing the relationship between
Parliament and the courts” including the
729:
229:
458:
147:
2001) art 7. They also argued that a hybrid bill procedure did not comply with the
128:
116:
74:
88:
62:
270:
169:
124:
132:
715:
152:
136:
508:
R (Miller) v The Prime
Minister and Cherry v Advocate General for Scotland
95:
case, concerning the conflict of law between a national legal system and
699:
591:"HS2: supreme court rejects appeal by opponents of high–speed rail link"
38:
140:
18:
R (HS2 Action
Alliance Limited) v Secretary of State for Transport
233:
120:
85:
R (HS2 Action
Alliance Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport
32:
R (HS2 Action Alliance Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport
131:
railway from London to Birmingham (phase 1), and then on to
68:
58:
50:
31:
343:Dissolution and Calling of Parliament Act 2022
331:European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Act 2020
149:Environmental Impact Assessment Directive 2011
652:Group, Constitutional Law (23 January 2014).
482:R (HS2 Action Alliance) v Transport Secretary
245:
127:procedure in Parliament for constructing the
8:
252:
238:
230:
37:
28:
736:Constitutional laws of the United Kingdom
581:
746:United Kingdom constitutional case law
741:United Kingdom administrative case law
680:
670:
7:
647:
645:
643:
622:
620:
618:
616:
443:R (Factortame) v Transport Secretary
431:Attorney General v Jonathan Cape Ltd
25:
658:UK Constitutional Law Association
559:Thoburn v Sunderland City Council
391:Greater London Authority Act 1999
113:Hillingdon London Borough Council
589:Topham, Gwyn (22 January 2014).
419:Pickin v British Railways Board
469:R (Jackson) v Attorney General
202:Constitutional Reform Act 2005
109:Buckinghamshire County Council
1:
526:European Communities Act 1972
495:R (Miller) v Brexit Secretary
211:European Communities Act 1972
194:European Communities Act 1972
704:Journal of Environmental Law
373:Government of Wales Act 1998
77:, parliamentary sovereignty
767:
455:R (Simms) v Home Secretary
543:
533:
523:
503:
491:
477:
465:
451:
439:
427:
415:
403:
388:
382:Northern Ireland Act 1998
379:
370:
361:
355:Local Government Act 1972
352:
339:
327:
317:
307:
288:
278:
268:
261:Parliamentary sovereignty
107:The HS2 Action Alliance,
73:
36:
182:Claim of Rights Act 1689
698:Edwards, Denis (2014).
536:European Union Act 2011
310:United Nations Act 1946
223:
222:
206:
186:Act of Settlement 1701
180:and (in Scotland) the
174:Petition of Right 1628
631:[2014] UKSC 3
570:UK constitutional law
547:UK constitutional law
320:Human Rights Act 1998
221:
216:
198:Human Rights Act 1998
166:
93:UK constitutional law
516:Repealed legislation
407:Stockdale v Hansard
298:Parliament Act 1949
291:Parliament Act 1911
281:Bill of Rights 1689
683:has generic name (
123:. This proposed a
97:European Union law
565:UK enterprise law
553:
552:
364:Scotland Act 1998
190:Act of Union 1707
145:Aarhus Convention
81:
80:
16:(Redirected from
758:
720:
719:
695:
689:
688:
682:
678:
676:
668:
666:
664:
649:
638:
624:
611:
610:
604:
602:
586:
509:
483:
410:(1839) 9A&E1
344:
332:
271:Magna Carta 1215
254:
247:
240:
231:
41:
29:
21:
766:
765:
761:
760:
759:
757:
756:
755:
726:
725:
724:
723:
697:
696:
692:
679:
669:
662:
660:
651:
650:
641:
625:
614:
600:
598:
588:
587:
583:
578:
554:
549:
539:
529:
519:
518:
513:
507:
499:
487:
481:
473:
461:
447:
435:
423:
411:
399:
398:
396:Court judgments
393:
384:
375:
366:
357:
348:
347:
342:
335:
330:
323:
313:
303:
284:
274:
264:
258:
228:
161:
105:
46:
44:High Speed Rail
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
764:
762:
754:
753:
748:
743:
738:
728:
727:
722:
721:
710:(2): 319–329.
690:
639:
612:
580:
579:
577:
574:
573:
572:
567:
562:
551:
550:
544:
541:
540:
534:
531:
530:
524:
521:
520:
514:
504:
501:
500:
492:
489:
488:
478:
475:
474:
466:
463:
462:
452:
449:
448:
440:
437:
436:
428:
425:
424:
416:
413:
412:
404:
401:
400:
394:
389:
386:
385:
380:
377:
376:
371:
368:
367:
362:
359:
358:
353:
350:
349:
340:
337:
336:
328:
325:
324:
318:
315:
314:
308:
305:
304:
289:
286:
285:
279:
276:
275:
269:
266:
265:
259:
257:
256:
249:
242:
234:
227:
224:
178:Bill of Rights
160:
157:
155:article 6(4).
104:
101:
79:
78:
71:
70:
66:
65:
60:
56:
55:
52:
48:
47:
42:
34:
33:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
763:
752:
749:
747:
744:
742:
739:
737:
734:
733:
731:
717:
713:
709:
705:
701:
694:
691:
686:
674:
659:
655:
648:
646:
644:
640:
636:
635:Supreme Court
632:
628:
623:
621:
619:
617:
613:
609:
596:
592:
585:
582:
575:
571:
568:
566:
563:
561:
560:
556:
555:
548:
542:
537:
532:
527:
522:
517:
511:
510:
502:
497:
496:
490:
485:
484:
476:
471:
470:
464:
460:
457:
456:
450:
445:
444:
438:
433:
432:
426:
421:
420:
414:
409:
408:
402:
397:
392:
387:
383:
378:
374:
369:
365:
360:
356:
351:
345:
338:
333:
326:
321:
316:
311:
306:
302:
299:
295:
292:
287:
282:
277:
272:
267:
262:
255:
250:
248:
243:
241:
236:
235:
232:
225:
220:
215:
212:
205:
203:
199:
195:
191:
187:
183:
179:
175:
171:
165:
158:
156:
154:
150:
146:
142:
138:
134:
130:
126:
122:
118:
114:
110:
102:
100:
98:
94:
90:
87:
86:
76:
72:
67:
64:
61:
57:
54:Supreme Court
53:
49:
45:
40:
35:
30:
27:
19:
751:High Speed 2
707:
703:
693:
661:. Retrieved
657:
626:
606:
599:. Retrieved
595:The Guardian
594:
584:
557:
515:
505:
493:
480:
479:
467:
453:
441:
434:3 All ER 484
429:
417:
405:
395:
217:
207:
167:
162:
129:High Speed 2
117:Heathrow Hub
106:
84:
83:
82:
75:Constitution
26:
681:|last=
608:assessment.
170:Magna Carta
135:as well as
125:hybrid bill
730:Categories
576:References
133:Manchester
716:0952-8873
168:207. "...
153:EIAD 2011
137:Sheffield
673:cite web
597:. London
512:UKSC 24
283:arts 1–4
226:See also
219:intend."
200:and the
188:and the
159:Judgment
69:Keywords
59:Citation
472:UKHL 56
459:UKHL 33
346:s 2(1)
334:s 38(1)
263:sources
714:
601:24 May
498:UKSC 5
486:UKSC 3
446:UKHL 7
422:AC 765
322:ss 3–6
294:ss 1–2
196:, the
192:. The
184:, the
176:, the
172:, the
115:, and
89:UKSC 3
63:UKSC 3
663:5 May
629:
273:cl 12
141:Leeds
103:Facts
91:is a
51:Court
712:ISSN
685:help
665:2024
637:(UK)
603:2020
545:see
538:s 18
296:and
204:..."
139:and
528:s 2
312:s 1
301:s 1
121:HS2
732::
708:26
706:.
702:.
677::
675:}}
671:{{
656:.
642:^
615:^
605:.
593:.
111:,
99:.
718:.
687:)
667:.
253:e
246:t
239:v
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
