Knowledge

R v Cuerrier

Source đź“ť

29: 344:, was charged with criminal negligence causing bodily harm in 1991 after potentially infecting up to 14 women. (He was charged after Ssenyonga, but went to trial earlier.) He was sentenced in 1992 to two-and-a-half years in prison; on a Crown appeal, Mercer's sentence was increased to 11 years. Mercer was released from prison in 2003. 424:, the Court found that "significant risk of bodily harm is negated if (i) the accused’s viral load at the time of sexual relations was low; and (ii) condom protection was used". Many anti-criminalization groups maintain that even this clarification is equally ambiguous without explicitly defining a threshold for low viral load. 347:
In 2003, Edward Kelly was charged, and convicted of knowingly exposing four women to HIV, and sentenced to three years in prison. In 2004, Jennifer Murphy became the first woman charged in Canada with failing to disclose her HIV status to a sexual partner. She spent one year under house arrest before
293:
The court also did not rule that any burden of proof exists whether the accused even knew how to protect their sexual partners. While practising safer sex is considered a valid defense, no burden of proof exists whether the HIV-positive partner had ever actually been educated in safer sex practices.
319:
it would be one thing if we had perfect HIV prevention, and still there were people who were "acting irresponsibly". But we're not in that situation at all. I see the criminalization debate as a red herring — it diverts us from addressing the real problems with prevention, and care. It allows us to
336:
Harold Williams of Newfoundland was charged with aggravated assault, and common nuisance in a controversial 2003 decision, which overturned a 2000 sentencing. While Williams knowingly had frequent unprotected sex with a partner, and she became HIV positive, he received a relatively light charge as
206:
Under Canadian law, a charge of aggravated assault requires proof that the defendant's actions endangered the life of the complainant, and that the force must have been intentionally applied. Cuerrier, whose case was based on the fact that both women had consented to have unprotected sex with him,
403:
nondisclosure. After being diagnosed with HIV in 2004, Clato Mabior underwent aggressive antiretroviral therapy, and was adhering to treatment at the time of pursuing sexual relations with multiple partners between 2004 and 2006. Despite intermittent condom use, HIV was never transmitted to his
404:
partners. Ultimately, the Court convicted Mr. Mabior with six counts of aggravated sexual assault. The Court's vague justification for serostatus disclosure under circumstances that lead to "significant risk of bodily harm" remained a particularly contentious issue in the aftermath of
337:
the Crown could not provide evidence that she was previously HIV negative. However, the impact of this decision was mitigated as Williams was separately sentenced to five years imprisonment for having unprotected sex with two other women without disclosing his HIV positive status.
297:
Generally, legal analysts and HIV educators viewed the decision as "the wrong tool for the job", suggesting that it was an attempt to use criminal law to resolve what is, first and foremost, a public health matter.
233:
The judges were unanimous in ruling that failure to disclose HIV status constituted fraud, although they differed on how to implement the ruling in law. The majority decision, authored by Justice
203:
to protect his partners. Both women later learned of Cuerrier's HIV status, and Cuerrier was subsequently charged with aggravated assault even though both women subsequently tested HIV-negative.
289:
lulling sexually active persons into a "false sense of security" that they need not practice safer sex since criminal law, rather than their own sexual behaviour, protects them from HIV risk.
255:
favoured the specific addition of a clause regarding "deceit about sexually transmitted disease that induces consent" in the legal definition of fraud. In another minority opinion, Justice
320:
feel like we're solving the crisis by going after these very specific, and very weird situations when we're avoiding the much bigger problems that lead to most HIV transmissions.
378:. He was convicted, on April 4, 2009 of two counts of murder in the first degree, ten counts of aggravated sexual assault, and one count of attempted aggravated sexual assault. 333:, who was charged with aggravated assault stemming from three sexual encounters in the late 1980s. However, Ssenyonga died in 1993 before a verdict was rendered in his case. 412:
did not expressly define "significant risk", lower courts inconsistently criminalized HIV-positive defendants based on varied interpretations of the clause. In large part,
259:
argued that the first, and third criteria set out by Cory should suffice for a conviction; she did not favour a burden of proof whether there was an actual risk of harm.
456: 341: 484: 329:
The first Canadian citizen ever charged with failing to disclose his HIV status to a sexual partner was Charles Ssenyonga, a Ugandan immigrant living in
275:
the prospect that criminalizing a failure to disclose one's HIV status will deter sexually active persons from getting tested for HIV in the first place,
199:
who tested positive for HIV in 1992. He subsequently had sexual relationships with two women, in which he neither disclosed his HIV status nor used
557: 389:
men, as black men have disproportionately high rates of HIV. One notable scholarly paper on the Ssenyonga case, published in 2005, was titled
562: 534: 382: 572: 452: 567: 223:. The women's consent to unprotected sexual activity, therefore, was not validly given as it was obtained through fraudulent means. 363:
for failing to disclose his HIV status to a sex partner. Smith was found guilty of aggravated sexual assault on February 8, 2007.
208: 470: 268: 552: 440: 256: 101: 496: 352: 529: 521: 172: 34: 399:, 2012 SCC 47 reflects the Supreme Court of Canada's most recent decision outlining criminal liability for 271:, intervened in the case. The group raised a number of potential implications of the decision, including: 28: 348:
the charge was withdrawn in 2007, mainly because she had insisted on condom use during the incident.
525: 371: 252: 180: 113: 385:
aspects of the cases. Many of the cases of HIV transmission prosecuted to date have involved
125: 370:, whose case was first investigated, and publicized in 2004, to stand trial on two counts of 196: 105: 244:
there was a harm, or a risk of harm, to the complainant as a result of that dishonesty, and
330: 117: 386: 360: 311: 306: 219:
The Supreme Court ruled that Cuerrier's failure to disclose his HIV status constituted
546: 367: 302: 121: 94: 60: 536:
After Cuerrier: Canadian Criminal Law and the Non-Disclosure of HIV-Positive Status
356: 237:, set out three criteria which should be proven in a prosecution on these grounds: 230:
does not necessarily have a legal responsibility to disclose his or her status.
247:
the complainant would not have consented but for the dishonesty by the accused.
400: 234: 129: 109: 241:
the accused committed an act that a reasonable person would see as dishonest,
279: 227: 283: 226:
The court did, however, rule that an HIV-positive person who practices
366:
On November 16, a court ruled that there was sufficient evidence for
282:-patient relationships if the courts open the door to a doctor being 200: 487:
African Immigrant Damnation Syndrome: The Case of Charles Ssenyonga
220: 375: 176: 207:
was acquitted in the initial court hearing. On appeal to the
175:, which ruled that knowingly exposing a sexual partner to 156: 148: 140: 135: 85: 77: 69: 59: 49: 42: 21: 144:Cory J, joined by Major, Bastarache and Binnie JJ 471:"Because All Black People's Lives Are Important" 374:after two of his former sexual partners died of 317: 54:Her Majesty The Queen v. Henry Gerard Cuerrier 420:, and an attempt to sharpen the criteria. In 8: 342:Upper Island Cove, Newfoundland and Labrador 286:to testify as to the defendant's HIV status, 381:Analysts have also called attention to the 453:"Charge withdrawn in St. John's HIV case" 81:Crown appeal allowed, new trial ordered. 433: 211:, the first court's ruling was upheld. 278:the potential of a negative impact on 18: 7: 491:Sexuality Research and Social Policy 391:African Immigrant Damnation Syndrome 340:Ray Mercer, a 28-year-old man from 179:constitutes a prosecutable crime ( 14: 160:McLachlin J, joined by Gonthier J 459:from the original on 2007-05-20. 209:British Columbia Court of Appeal 27: 269:Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network 251:In a minority opinion, Justice 1: 558:Supreme Court of Canada cases 563:Criminal transmission of HIV 16:Supreme Court of Canada case 171:was a 1998 decision by the 589: 573:Canadian criminal case law 45:Judgment: December 3, 1998 568:1998 in Canadian case law 416:represents a response to 361:aggravated sexual assault 90: 26: 353:Canadian Football League 43:Hearing: March 27, 1998 522:Supreme Court of Canada 173:Supreme Court of Canada 35:Supreme Court of Canada 359:was also charged with 322: 309:, a vice-president of 267:Groups, including the 183:) under Canadian law. 351:On October 28, 2005, 257:Claire L'Heureux-DubĂ© 102:Claire L'Heureux-DubĂ© 215:Reasons of the court 372:first-degree murder 553:HIV/AIDS in Canada 253:Beverley McLachlin 191:The case involved 181:aggravated assault 114:Beverley McLachlin 73:BC Court of Appeal 538:at www.aidslaw.ca 315:, commented that 164: 163: 126:Michel Bastarache 580: 508: 507: 505: 504: 495:. Archived from 481: 475: 474: 467: 461: 460: 449: 443: 438: 197:British Columbia 152:L'Heureux‑DubĂ© J 106:Charles Gonthier 99:Puisne Justices: 86:Court membership 31: 19: 588: 587: 583: 582: 581: 579: 578: 577: 543: 542: 517: 512: 511: 502: 500: 483: 482: 478: 469: 468: 464: 451: 450: 446: 439: 435: 430: 331:London, Ontario 327: 265: 217: 189: 118:Frank Iacobucci 97: 44: 38: 17: 12: 11: 5: 586: 584: 576: 575: 570: 565: 560: 555: 545: 544: 541: 540: 532: 516: 515:External links 513: 510: 509: 476: 462: 444: 432: 431: 429: 426: 326: 323: 307:Stephen Gendin 291: 290: 287: 276: 264: 261: 249: 248: 245: 242: 216: 213: 193:Henry Cuerrier 188: 185: 162: 161: 158: 154: 153: 150: 146: 145: 142: 138: 137: 133: 132: 92:Chief Justice: 88: 87: 83: 82: 79: 75: 74: 71: 67: 66: 63: 57: 56: 51: 50:Full case name 47: 46: 40: 39: 32: 24: 23: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 585: 574: 571: 569: 566: 564: 561: 559: 556: 554: 551: 550: 548: 539: 537: 533: 531: 527: 523: 520:Full text of 519: 518: 514: 499:on 2011-05-19 498: 494: 492: 488: 480: 477: 472: 466: 463: 458: 454: 448: 445: 442: 437: 434: 427: 425: 423: 419: 415: 411: 407: 402: 398: 394: 392: 388: 384: 379: 377: 373: 369: 368:Johnson Aziga 364: 362: 358: 354: 349: 345: 343: 338: 334: 332: 324: 321: 316: 314: 313: 308: 304: 301:In a similar 299: 295: 288: 285: 281: 277: 274: 273: 272: 270: 262: 260: 258: 254: 246: 243: 240: 239: 238: 236: 231: 229: 224: 222: 214: 212: 210: 204: 202: 198: 195:, a man from 194: 186: 184: 182: 178: 174: 170: 169: 159: 155: 151: 147: 143: 139: 136:Reasons given 134: 131: 127: 123: 122:John C. Major 119: 115: 111: 107: 103: 100: 96: 95:Antonio Lamer 93: 89: 84: 80: 76: 72: 70:Prior history 68: 64: 62: 58: 55: 52: 48: 41: 37: 36: 30: 25: 20: 535: 524:decision at 501:. Retrieved 497:the original 490: 486: 479: 465: 447: 436: 421: 417: 413: 409: 405: 396: 395: 390: 380: 365: 357:Trevis Smith 350: 346: 339: 335: 328: 318: 310: 300: 296: 292: 266: 263:Implications 250: 232: 225: 218: 205: 192: 190: 168:R v Cuerrier 167: 166: 165: 98: 91: 53: 33: 22:R v Cuerrier 325:Other cases 157:Concurrence 149:Concurrence 547:Categories 528: and 503:2005-11-16 428:References 408:. Because 401:serostatus 397:R v Mabior 284:subpoenaed 235:Peter Cory 187:Background 130:Ian Binnie 110:Peter Cory 228:safer sex 65:2 SCR 371 61:Citations 457:Archived 418:Cuerrier 410:Cuerrier 406:Cuerrier 303:American 141:Majority 355:player 201:condoms 530:CanLII 441:cbc.ca 422:Mabior 414:Mabior 383:racial 305:case, 280:doctor 78:Ruling 526:LexUM 387:black 221:fraud 376:AIDS 489:in 312:Poz 177:HIV 549:: 455:. 393:. 128:, 124:, 120:, 116:, 112:, 108:, 104:, 506:. 493:" 485:" 473:.

Index

Supreme Court of Canada
Supreme Court of Canada
Citations
Antonio Lamer
Claire L'Heureux-Dubé
Charles Gonthier
Peter Cory
Beverley McLachlin
Frank Iacobucci
John C. Major
Michel Bastarache
Ian Binnie
Supreme Court of Canada
HIV
aggravated assault
British Columbia
condoms
British Columbia Court of Appeal
fraud
safer sex
Peter Cory
Beverley McLachlin
Claire L'Heureux-Dubé
Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network
doctor
subpoenaed
American
Stephen Gendin
Poz
London, Ontario

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑