29:
251:
They picketed the provincial court house and the police station. Lucas held signs that said: "Did help/or take part in the rape & sodomy of an 8 year old. The ... papers prove allowed his witness to rape"; and "The papers prove allowed the false arrest & detention of Mrs. Lucas, with a
247:
activist, for help with dealing with the effect the charges have had on their lives. Together they developed a theory that one of the police officers in the investigation had been complicit in the sexual abuse and had allowed the four to be charged.
295:
wrote a separate concurring opinion but added that she was concerned that Cory's comments about the value of the statements would "lower the bar of justification from the outset of the s. 1 analysis".
281:
222:
212:
382:
304:
377:
227:
217:
171:
387:
261:. The provision required that the accused knew the statement to be false and knew it would expose the person to hatred, contempt, or ridicule.
392:
243:
case had resulted in charges against a number of people. Charges for four of them were stayed. These four went to see John Lucas, a
101:
280:, for the majority of the Court, held that the provision violated the right to expression but was saved under
325:
317:
194:
34:
257:
202:
176:
344:
208:
28:
244:
321:
356:
292:
240:
117:
288:. He stated that protecting reputation from false attacks was a justifiable purpose of the law.
129:
198:
109:
121:
371:
125:
94:
60:
105:
277:
113:
144:
Cory J., joined by Lamer C.J. and
Gonthier, Iacobucci and Bastarache JJ.
207:
offence of defamatory libel infringed the constitutional protection of
221:, but the offence was a reasonable limit prescribed by law under
54:
John David Lucas and
Johanna Erna Lucas v Her Majesty The Queen
268:
provision violated the right to freedom of expression.
305:
List of
Supreme Court of Canada cases (Lamer Court)
164:
156:
148:
140:
135:
85:
77:
69:
59:
49:
42:
21:
383:Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms case law
8:
264:The issue before the Court was whether the
255:Lucas was charged under section 300 of the
378:Canadian freedom of expression case law
337:
218:Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
172:Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
18:
7:
197:decision on the criminal offence of
345:SCC Case Information - Docket 25177
14:
27:
239:A police investigation into a
1:
388:Supreme Court of Canada cases
16:Supreme Court of Canada case
409:
201:. The Court held that the
43:Hearing: October 15, 1997
393:1998 in Canadian case law
169:
160:Major J. and McLachlin J.
90:
26:
252:falsified information".
347:Supreme Court of Canada
318:Supreme Court of Canada
195:Supreme Court of Canada
45:Judgment: April 2, 1998
35:Supreme Court of Canada
209:freedom of expression
102:Claire L'Heureux-Dubé
272:Reasons of the court
241:child sexual abuse
118:Beverley McLachlin
245:prisoners' rights
185:
184:
152:L’Heureux-Dubé J.
130:Michel Bastarache
400:
362:
354:
348:
342:
199:defamatory libel
110:Charles Gonthier
99:Puisne Justices:
86:Court membership
81:Appeal dismissed
31:
19:
408:
407:
403:
402:
401:
399:
398:
397:
368:
367:
366:
365:
355:
351:
343:
339:
334:
313:
301:
274:
237:
193:is the leading
187:
175:
122:Frank Iacobucci
97:
44:
38:
17:
12:
11:
5:
406:
404:
396:
395:
390:
385:
380:
370:
369:
364:
363:
349:
336:
335:
333:
330:
329:
328:
312:
311:External links
309:
308:
307:
300:
297:
273:
270:
236:
233:
183:
182:
167:
166:
162:
161:
158:
157:Concur/dissent
154:
153:
150:
146:
145:
142:
138:
137:
133:
132:
92:Chief Justice:
88:
87:
83:
82:
79:
75:
74:
71:
67:
66:
63:
57:
56:
51:
50:Full case name
47:
46:
40:
39:
32:
24:
23:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
405:
394:
391:
389:
386:
384:
381:
379:
376:
375:
373:
361:
360:, 1 SCR 439.
359:
353:
350:
346:
341:
338:
331:
327:
323:
319:
316:Full text of
315:
314:
310:
306:
303:
302:
298:
296:
294:
289:
287:
283:
279:
271:
269:
267:
266:Criminal Code
262:
260:
259:
258:Criminal Code
253:
249:
246:
242:
234:
232:
230:
229:
224:
220:
219:
214:
210:
206:
205:
204:Criminal Code
200:
196:
192:
191:
180:
179:
178:Criminal Code
174:
173:
168:
163:
159:
155:
151:
147:
143:
139:
136:Reasons given
134:
131:
127:
126:John C. Major
123:
119:
115:
111:
107:
103:
100:
96:
95:Antonio Lamer
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
62:
58:
55:
52:
48:
41:
37:
36:
30:
25:
20:
357:
352:
340:
320:decision at
290:
285:
275:
265:
263:
256:
254:
250:
238:
226:
216:
213:Section 2(b)
203:
189:
188:
186:
177:
170:
165:Laws applied
106:John Sopinka
98:
91:
53:
33:
149:Concurrence
372:Categories
332:References
324: and
235:Background
114:Peter Cory
70:Docket No.
358:R v Lucas
293:McLachlin
282:section 1
223:Section 1
190:R v Lucas
65:1 SCR 439
61:Citations
22:R v Lucas
299:See also
291:Justice
276:Justice
181:, s 300.
141:Majority
286:Charter
284:of the
228:Charter
225:of the
215:of the
326:CanLII
211:under
78:Ruling
73:25177
322:LexUM
278:Cory
374::
231:.
128:,
124:,
120:,
116:,
112:,
108:,
104:,
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
