Knowledge (XXG)

Ramsey problem

Source đź“ť

77:
this would result in a price less than average cost, and the firm could not survive without subsidy. The Ramsey problem is to decide exactly how much to raise each product's price above its marginal cost so the firm's revenue equals its total cost. If there is just one product, the problem is simple: raise the price to where it equals average cost. If there are two products, there is leeway to raise one product's price more and the other's less, so long as the firm can break even overall.
1099: 93:
in order to maximize overall social welfare. Customers sometimes object to it on that basis, since they care about their own individual welfare, not social welfare. Customers who are charged more may consider unfair, especially they, with less elastic demand, would say they "need" the good more. In such situations regulators may further limit an operator’s ability to adopt Ramsey prices.
843: 87:
In practice, government regulators are concerned with more than maximizing the sum of producer and consumer surplus. They may wish to put more weight on the surplus of politically powerful consumers, or they may wish to help the poor by putting more weight on their surplus. Moreover, many people will
92:
because the two products with different elasticities of demand are one physically identical product sold to two different groups of customers, e.g., electricity to residential customers and to commercial customers. Ramsey pricing says to charge whichever group has less elastic demand a higher price
76:
In a first-best world, without the need to earn enough revenue to cover fixed costs, the optimal solution would be to set the price for each product equal to its marginal cost. If the average cost curve is declining where the demand curve crosses it however, as happens when the fixed cost is large,
1094:{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}p_{i}-C_{i}\left(\mathbf {q} \right)&=-\lambda \left({\frac {\partial R}{\partial q_{i}}}-C_{i}\left(\mathbf {q} \right)\right)\\&=-\lambda \left(p_{i}\left(1-{\frac {1}{\mathrm {Elasticity} _{i}}}\right)-C_{i}\left(\mathbf {q} \right)\right)\end{aligned}}} 67:
earns negative profits if it sets price equals to marginal cost, so it must set prices for some or all of the products it sells to above marginal cost if it is to be viable without government subsidies. Ramsey pricing says to mark up most the goods with the least elastic (that is, least
635: 1449: 1276: 483: 493: 806: 243: 738:. Typically, the fixed value is zero, which is to say that the regulator wants to maximize welfare subject to the constraint that the firm not lose money. The constraint can be stated generally as: 1499: 848: 155: 677: 353: 1336: 1161: 1614: 835: 1575: 392: 1122: 736: 709: 1328: 301: 270: 1549: 1299: 1519: 80:
The principle is applicable to pricing of goods that the government is the sole supplier of (public utilities) or regulation of natural monopolies, such as
88:
see Ramsey pricing as unfair, especially if they do not understand why it maximizes total surplus. In some contexts, Ramsey pricing is a form of
1628:, one must increase prices to rigid and elastic demands/supplies in the same proportion, in relation to the prices that would be charged at the 1521:
is again inversely proportional to the elasticity of demand. Note that the Ramsey mark-up is smaller than the ordinary monopoly markup of the
397: 84:
firms, where it is efficient for only one firm to operate but the government regulates its prices so it does not earn above-market profits.
630:{\displaystyle W\left(\mathbf {p,q} \right)=\sum _{i}\left(\int \limits _{0}^{q_{i}(p_{i})}p_{i}(q)dq\right)-C\left(\mathbf {q} \right).} 1616:
is non-binding). The Ramsey-price setting monopoly is in a second-best equilibrium, between ordinary monopoly and perfect competition.
1700: 744: 160: 1764: 1641: 1457: 1759: 1624:
An easier way to solve this problem in a two-output context is the Ramsey condition. According to Ramsey, as to minimize
104: 303:
is the price. Suppose that the products are sold in separate markets so demands are independent, and demand for good
48: 44: 643: 1629: 29: 815:
technique to yield the optimal output values, and backing out the optimal prices. The first order conditions on
1754: 310: 1444:{\displaystyle {\frac {p_{i}-C_{i}\left(\mathbf {q} \right)}{p_{i}}}={\frac {k}{\mathrm {Elasticity} _{i}}}} 1271:{\displaystyle \mathrm {Elasticity} _{i}=-{\frac {\partial q_{i}}{\partial p_{i}}}{\frac {p_{i}}{q_{i}}}} 89: 59:: the more elastic the demand or supply, the smaller the optimal tax. The rule was later applied by 1703:“Tariff Design: Economics of Tariff Design – Deviations from Marginal Cost Pricing: Ramsey Pricing” 812: 1580: 818: 40:(the sum of producer and consumer surplus) while earning enough revenue to cover its fixed costs. 1730: 1683: 1554: 358: 1107: 714: 682: 81: 37: 1722: 1675: 64: 1306: 279: 248: 1625: 52: 1528: 1281: 1504: 60: 1748: 1769: 1646: 1522: 56: 43:
Under Ramsey pricing, the price markup over marginal cost is inverse to the
63:(1956) to natural monopolies (industries with decreasing average cost). A 51:: the more elastic the product's demand or supply, the smaller the markup. 33: 478:{\displaystyle R\left(\mathbf {p,q} \right)=\sum _{i}p_{i}q_{i}(p_{i}).} 1734: 1687: 1713:
Ramsey, Frank P. (1927). "A Contribution to the Theory of Taxation".
1666:
Ramsey, Frank P. (1927). "A Contribution to the Theory of Taxation".
36:
should charge for the various products it sells in order to maximize
1726: 1679: 1501:. That is, the price margin compared to marginal cost for good 801:{\displaystyle R(\mathbf {p,q} )-C(\mathbf {q} )\geq \Pi ^{*}} 238:{\displaystyle C(q_{1},q_{2},\ldots ,q_{N})=C(\mathbf {q} ),} 101:
Consider the problem of a regulator seeking to set prices
679:
by choice of the subject to the requirement that profit
1494:{\displaystyle k={\frac {\lambda }{1+\lambda }}<1.} 1583: 1557: 1531: 1507: 1460: 1339: 1309: 1284: 1164: 1110: 846: 821: 747: 717: 685: 646: 496: 400: 361: 313: 282: 251: 163: 107: 1608: 1569: 1543: 1513: 1493: 1443: 1322: 1293: 1270: 1116: 1093: 829: 800: 730: 703: 671: 629: 477: 386: 347: 295: 264: 237: 149: 150:{\displaystyle \left(p_{1},\ldots ,p_{N}\right)} 32:policy problem concerning what prices a public 1701:Body of Knowledge on Infrastructure Regulation 8: 672:{\displaystyle W\left(\mathbf {p,q} \right)} 1632:solution (price equal to marginal cost). 1588: 1582: 1556: 1530: 1506: 1467: 1459: 1433: 1401: 1395: 1384: 1370: 1360: 1347: 1340: 1338: 1314: 1308: 1283: 1260: 1250: 1244: 1235: 1220: 1210: 1198: 1166: 1163: 1109: 1073: 1063: 1043: 1011: 1005: 988: 949: 939: 923: 905: 878: 868: 855: 847: 845: 822: 820: 792: 777: 754: 746: 722: 716: 684: 654: 645: 615: 579: 564: 551: 546: 541: 526: 504: 495: 463: 450: 440: 430: 408: 399: 366: 360: 332: 318: 312: 287: 281: 256: 250: 224: 206: 187: 174: 162: 157:for a multiproduct monopolist with costs 136: 117: 106: 348:{\displaystyle q_{i}\left(p_{i}\right),} 1658: 1278:is the elasticity of demand for good 811:This problem may be solved using the 7: 68:price-sensitive) demand or supply. 1585: 1429: 1426: 1423: 1420: 1417: 1414: 1411: 1408: 1405: 1402: 1228: 1213: 1194: 1191: 1188: 1185: 1182: 1179: 1176: 1173: 1170: 1167: 1039: 1036: 1033: 1030: 1027: 1024: 1021: 1018: 1015: 1012: 916: 908: 789: 719: 686: 55:found this 1927 in the context of 14: 1371: 1074: 950: 879: 823: 778: 761: 758: 755: 661: 658: 655: 616: 511: 508: 505: 415: 412: 409: 225: 97:Formal presentation and solution 1577:(the fixed-profit requirement, 1137:) is the partial derivative of 782: 774: 765: 751: 591: 585: 570: 557: 469: 456: 378: 372: 229: 221: 212: 167: 1: 355:with inverse demand function 1609:{\displaystyle \Pi ^{*}=R-C} 830:{\displaystyle \mathbf {q} } 640:The problem is to maximize 1786: 1570:{\displaystyle \lambda =1} 1124:is a Lagrange multiplier, 487:Total welfare is given by 49:Price elasticity of supply 45:price elasticity of demand 1642:Amoroso–Robinson relation 387:{\displaystyle p_{i}(q).} 1117:{\displaystyle \lambda } 731:{\displaystyle \Pi ^{*}} 704:{\displaystyle \Pi =R-C} 1330:and rearranging yields 711:equal some fixed value 1765:Mathematical economics 1610: 1571: 1545: 1515: 1495: 1445: 1324: 1295: 1272: 1118: 1095: 831: 802: 732: 705: 673: 631: 574: 479: 388: 349: 297: 272:is the output of good 266: 239: 151: 26:Ramsey–Boiteux pricing 1611: 1572: 1546: 1516: 1496: 1446: 1325: 1323:{\displaystyle p_{i}} 1296: 1273: 1119: 1096: 832: 803: 733: 706: 674: 632: 537: 480: 389: 350: 298: 296:{\displaystyle p_{i}} 267: 265:{\displaystyle q_{i}} 240: 152: 1760:Monopoly (economics) 1715:The Economic Journal 1668:The Economic Journal 1581: 1555: 1529: 1505: 1458: 1337: 1307: 1282: 1162: 1108: 844: 819: 745: 715: 683: 644: 494: 398: 359: 311: 280: 249: 161: 105: 90:price discrimination 1544:{\displaystyle k=1} 813:Lagrange multiplier 1606: 1567: 1541: 1511: 1491: 1441: 1320: 1294:{\displaystyle i.} 1291: 1268: 1145:) with respect to 1114: 1091: 1089: 827: 798: 728: 701: 669: 627: 531: 475: 435: 384: 345: 293: 262: 235: 147: 82:telecommunications 1626:deadweight losses 1514:{\displaystyle i} 1483: 1439: 1390: 1266: 1242: 1049: 930: 522: 426: 394:Total revenue is 1777: 1739: 1738: 1710: 1704: 1698: 1692: 1691: 1663: 1620:Ramsey condition 1615: 1613: 1612: 1607: 1593: 1592: 1576: 1574: 1573: 1568: 1550: 1548: 1547: 1542: 1520: 1518: 1517: 1512: 1500: 1498: 1497: 1492: 1484: 1482: 1468: 1450: 1448: 1447: 1442: 1440: 1438: 1437: 1432: 1396: 1391: 1389: 1388: 1379: 1378: 1374: 1365: 1364: 1352: 1351: 1341: 1329: 1327: 1326: 1321: 1319: 1318: 1300: 1298: 1297: 1292: 1277: 1275: 1274: 1269: 1267: 1265: 1264: 1255: 1254: 1245: 1243: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1211: 1203: 1202: 1197: 1123: 1121: 1120: 1115: 1100: 1098: 1097: 1092: 1090: 1086: 1082: 1081: 1077: 1068: 1067: 1055: 1051: 1050: 1048: 1047: 1042: 1006: 993: 992: 966: 962: 958: 957: 953: 944: 943: 931: 929: 928: 927: 914: 906: 886: 882: 873: 872: 860: 859: 836: 834: 833: 828: 826: 807: 805: 804: 799: 797: 796: 781: 764: 737: 735: 734: 729: 727: 726: 710: 708: 707: 702: 678: 676: 675: 670: 668: 664: 636: 634: 633: 628: 623: 619: 604: 600: 584: 583: 573: 569: 568: 556: 555: 545: 530: 518: 514: 484: 482: 481: 476: 468: 467: 455: 454: 445: 444: 434: 422: 418: 393: 391: 390: 385: 371: 370: 354: 352: 351: 346: 341: 337: 336: 323: 322: 302: 300: 299: 294: 292: 291: 271: 269: 268: 263: 261: 260: 244: 242: 241: 236: 228: 211: 210: 192: 191: 179: 178: 156: 154: 153: 148: 146: 142: 141: 140: 122: 121: 65:natural monopoly 57:Optimal taxation 1785: 1784: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1755:Economic policy 1745: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1727:10.2307/2222721 1712: 1711: 1707: 1699: 1695: 1680:10.2307/2222721 1665: 1664: 1660: 1655: 1638: 1622: 1584: 1579: 1578: 1553: 1552: 1527: 1526: 1503: 1502: 1472: 1456: 1455: 1400: 1380: 1366: 1356: 1343: 1342: 1335: 1334: 1310: 1305: 1304: 1280: 1279: 1256: 1246: 1231: 1227: 1216: 1212: 1165: 1160: 1159: 1154:, evaluated at 1153: 1132: 1106: 1105: 1088: 1087: 1069: 1059: 1010: 998: 994: 984: 983: 979: 964: 963: 945: 935: 919: 915: 907: 904: 900: 887: 874: 864: 851: 842: 841: 817: 816: 788: 743: 742: 718: 713: 712: 681: 680: 650: 642: 641: 611: 575: 560: 547: 536: 532: 500: 492: 491: 459: 446: 436: 404: 396: 395: 362: 357: 356: 328: 324: 314: 309: 308: 283: 278: 277: 252: 247: 246: 202: 183: 170: 159: 158: 132: 113: 112: 108: 103: 102: 99: 74: 53:Frank P. Ramsey 12: 11: 5: 1783: 1781: 1773: 1772: 1767: 1762: 1757: 1747: 1746: 1741: 1740: 1721:(145): 47–61. 1705: 1693: 1674:(145): 47–61. 1657: 1656: 1654: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1644: 1637: 1634: 1621: 1618: 1605: 1602: 1599: 1596: 1591: 1587: 1566: 1563: 1560: 1540: 1537: 1534: 1510: 1490: 1487: 1481: 1478: 1475: 1471: 1466: 1463: 1452: 1451: 1436: 1431: 1428: 1425: 1422: 1419: 1416: 1413: 1410: 1407: 1404: 1399: 1394: 1387: 1383: 1377: 1373: 1369: 1363: 1359: 1355: 1350: 1346: 1317: 1313: 1290: 1287: 1263: 1259: 1253: 1249: 1238: 1234: 1230: 1223: 1219: 1215: 1209: 1206: 1201: 1196: 1193: 1190: 1187: 1184: 1181: 1178: 1175: 1172: 1169: 1149: 1128: 1113: 1102: 1101: 1085: 1080: 1076: 1072: 1066: 1062: 1058: 1054: 1046: 1041: 1038: 1035: 1032: 1029: 1026: 1023: 1020: 1017: 1014: 1009: 1004: 1001: 997: 991: 987: 982: 978: 975: 972: 969: 967: 965: 961: 956: 952: 948: 942: 938: 934: 926: 922: 918: 913: 910: 903: 899: 896: 893: 890: 888: 885: 881: 877: 871: 867: 863: 858: 854: 850: 849: 825: 809: 808: 795: 791: 787: 784: 780: 776: 773: 770: 767: 763: 760: 757: 753: 750: 725: 721: 700: 697: 694: 691: 688: 667: 663: 660: 657: 653: 649: 638: 637: 626: 622: 618: 614: 610: 607: 603: 599: 596: 593: 590: 587: 582: 578: 572: 567: 563: 559: 554: 550: 544: 540: 535: 529: 525: 521: 517: 513: 510: 507: 503: 499: 474: 471: 466: 462: 458: 453: 449: 443: 439: 433: 429: 425: 421: 417: 414: 411: 407: 403: 383: 380: 377: 374: 369: 365: 344: 340: 335: 331: 327: 321: 317: 290: 286: 259: 255: 234: 231: 227: 223: 220: 217: 214: 209: 205: 201: 198: 195: 190: 186: 182: 177: 173: 169: 166: 145: 139: 135: 131: 128: 125: 120: 116: 111: 98: 95: 73: 70: 61:Marcel Boiteux 38:social welfare 22:Ramsey pricing 18:Ramsey problem 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1782: 1771: 1768: 1766: 1763: 1761: 1758: 1756: 1753: 1752: 1750: 1736: 1732: 1728: 1724: 1720: 1716: 1709: 1706: 1702: 1697: 1694: 1689: 1685: 1681: 1677: 1673: 1669: 1662: 1659: 1652: 1648: 1645: 1643: 1640: 1639: 1635: 1633: 1631: 1627: 1619: 1617: 1603: 1600: 1597: 1594: 1589: 1564: 1561: 1558: 1538: 1535: 1532: 1524: 1508: 1488: 1485: 1479: 1476: 1473: 1469: 1464: 1461: 1434: 1397: 1392: 1385: 1381: 1375: 1367: 1361: 1357: 1353: 1348: 1344: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1315: 1311: 1301: 1288: 1285: 1261: 1257: 1251: 1247: 1236: 1232: 1221: 1217: 1207: 1204: 1199: 1157: 1152: 1148: 1144: 1140: 1136: 1131: 1127: 1111: 1083: 1078: 1070: 1064: 1060: 1056: 1052: 1044: 1007: 1002: 999: 995: 989: 985: 980: 976: 973: 970: 968: 959: 954: 946: 940: 936: 932: 924: 920: 911: 901: 897: 894: 891: 889: 883: 875: 869: 865: 861: 856: 852: 840: 839: 838: 814: 793: 785: 771: 768: 748: 741: 740: 739: 723: 698: 695: 692: 689: 665: 651: 647: 624: 620: 612: 608: 605: 601: 597: 594: 588: 580: 576: 565: 561: 552: 548: 542: 538: 533: 527: 523: 519: 515: 501: 497: 490: 489: 488: 485: 472: 464: 460: 451: 447: 441: 437: 431: 427: 423: 419: 405: 401: 381: 375: 367: 363: 342: 338: 333: 329: 325: 319: 315: 306: 288: 284: 275: 257: 253: 232: 218: 215: 207: 203: 199: 196: 193: 188: 184: 180: 175: 171: 164: 143: 137: 133: 129: 126: 123: 118: 114: 109: 96: 94: 91: 85: 83: 78: 71: 69: 66: 62: 58: 54: 50: 46: 41: 39: 35: 31: 27: 23: 19: 1718: 1714: 1708: 1696: 1671: 1667: 1661: 1647:Lerner index 1623: 1453: 1303:Dividing by 1302: 1155: 1150: 1146: 1142: 1138: 1134: 1129: 1125: 1103: 810: 639: 486: 304: 273: 100: 86: 79: 75: 42: 25: 21: 17: 15: 1523:Lerner Rule 72:Description 30:second-best 1749:Categories 1653:References 1630:first-best 1525:which has 1601:− 1590:∗ 1586:Π 1559:λ 1480:λ 1470:λ 1354:− 1229:∂ 1214:∂ 1208:− 1112:λ 1057:− 1003:− 977:λ 974:− 933:− 917:∂ 909:∂ 898:λ 895:− 862:− 794:∗ 790:Π 786:≥ 769:− 724:∗ 720:Π 696:− 687:Π 606:− 539:∫ 524:∑ 428:∑ 197:… 127:… 1636:See also 1551:, since 47:and the 34:monopoly 1735:2222721 1688:2222721 1158:, and 28:, is a 1733:  1686:  1454:where 1104:where 245:where 1731:JSTOR 1684:JSTOR 24:, or 20:, or 1486:< 837:are 276:and 16:The 1770:Tax 1723:doi 1676:doi 307:is 1751:: 1729:. 1719:37 1717:. 1682:. 1672:37 1670:. 1489:1. 1737:. 1725:: 1690:. 1678:: 1604:C 1598:R 1595:= 1565:1 1562:= 1539:1 1536:= 1533:k 1509:i 1477:+ 1474:1 1465:= 1462:k 1435:i 1430:y 1427:t 1424:i 1421:c 1418:i 1415:t 1412:s 1409:a 1406:l 1403:E 1398:k 1393:= 1386:i 1382:p 1376:) 1372:q 1368:( 1362:i 1358:C 1349:i 1345:p 1316:i 1312:p 1289:. 1286:i 1262:i 1258:q 1252:i 1248:p 1237:i 1233:p 1222:i 1218:q 1205:= 1200:i 1195:y 1192:t 1189:i 1186:c 1183:i 1180:t 1177:s 1174:a 1171:l 1168:E 1156:q 1151:i 1147:q 1143:q 1141:( 1139:C 1135:q 1133:( 1130:i 1126:C 1084:) 1079:) 1075:q 1071:( 1065:i 1061:C 1053:) 1045:i 1040:y 1037:t 1034:i 1031:c 1028:i 1025:t 1022:s 1019:a 1016:l 1013:E 1008:1 1000:1 996:( 990:i 986:p 981:( 971:= 960:) 955:) 951:q 947:( 941:i 937:C 925:i 921:q 912:R 902:( 892:= 884:) 880:q 876:( 870:i 866:C 857:i 853:p 824:q 783:) 779:q 775:( 772:C 766:) 762:q 759:, 756:p 752:( 749:R 699:C 693:R 690:= 666:) 662:q 659:, 656:p 652:( 648:W 625:. 621:) 617:q 613:( 609:C 602:) 598:q 595:d 592:) 589:q 586:( 581:i 577:p 571:) 566:i 562:p 558:( 553:i 549:q 543:0 534:( 528:i 520:= 516:) 512:q 509:, 506:p 502:( 498:W 473:. 470:) 465:i 461:p 457:( 452:i 448:q 442:i 438:p 432:i 424:= 420:) 416:q 413:, 410:p 406:( 402:R 382:. 379:) 376:q 373:( 368:i 364:p 343:, 339:) 334:i 330:p 326:( 320:i 316:q 305:i 289:i 285:p 274:i 258:i 254:q 233:, 230:) 226:q 222:( 219:C 216:= 213:) 208:N 204:q 200:, 194:, 189:2 185:q 181:, 176:1 172:q 168:( 165:C 144:) 138:N 134:p 130:, 124:, 119:1 115:p 110:(

Index

second-best
monopoly
social welfare
price elasticity of demand
Price elasticity of supply
Frank P. Ramsey
Optimal taxation
Marcel Boiteux
natural monopoly
telecommunications
price discrimination
Lagrange multiplier
Lerner Rule
deadweight losses
first-best
Amoroso–Robinson relation
Lerner index
doi
10.2307/2222721
JSTOR
2222721
Body of Knowledge on Infrastructure Regulation
doi
10.2307/2222721
JSTOR
2222721
Categories
Economic policy
Monopoly (economics)
Mathematical economics

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑