36:. The Workers' Educational Association purchased the lot in East York. The covenant prohibited the land to be sold to "Jews, or persons of objectionable nationality". Drummond Wren brought forward an action to have the restrictive covenant declared invalid. Wren was the general secretary of the Workers' Educational Association. He was represented by John Cartwright and Irving Himel. J. M. Bennett appeared as legal counsel for the Canadian Jewish Congress, assisted by
66:
Justice Mackay further stated: "...nothing could be more calculated to create or deepen divisions between existing religious and ethnic groups in the
Province, or in this Country, than the sanction of a method of land transfer which would permit the segregation areas, or conversely, would exclude
70:
Justice Mackay confirmed that the covenant was an improper restraint on alienation. Moreover, the wording in the covenant was uncertain, as the phrase "persons of objectionable nationality" lacked legal meaning.
109:
case. Justice Wilson recognized a tort of discrimination. In 1981, the
Supreme Court of Canada overturned Justice Wilson's ruling, finding instead no tort of discrimination in Canadian law.
126:
62:"...It appears to me to be a moral duty, at least, to lend aid to all forces of cohesion, and similarly to repel all fissiparous tendencies which would imperil national unity..."
215:
153:
304:
314:
178:
210:. Publications of the Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History. Waterloo, Ontario: Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History
148:. Publications of the Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History. Waterloo, Ontario: Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History
58:
by the United
Nations, to which Canada was a signatory, as a determining factor for public policy. He went on to state:
238:
105:
52:
Justice Mackay found the covenant to be invalid as a violation of public policy. He cited the recent signing of the
299:
309:
282:
278:
258:
234:
254:
54:
33:
29:
25:
211:
184:
174:
149:
41:
88:
83:
in a decision finding that a property covenant against
African Americans was invalid.
293:
96:
208:"Race", rights and the law in the Supreme Court of Canada: historical case studies
146:"Race", rights and the law in the Supreme Court of Canada: historical case studies
86:
Shortly after the case was considered, but not followed, by
Justice Schroeder in
37:
188:
127:"How restrictive contracts and bigotry lingered in Toronto real estate"
67:
particular groups from particular business or residential areas."
202:
Walker, James W. St G.; Walker, James
William St G. (1997). "
144:
Walker, James W. St G.; Walker, James
William St G. (1997).
171:
Constitutional Law Cases, Commentary and
Principles
32:, regarding the validity of a racially motivated
281:, OR 778, 4 DLR 674 (31 October 1945),
99:, then at the Ontario Court of Appeal, cited
8:
237:, 27 O.R. (2d) 142 (12 December 1979),
24:O.R. 778 (Ont. H.C.) is a decision by the
79:The Michigan Supreme Court in 1947 cited
118:
7:
204:Sipes v. McGhee, 316 Mich 614 (1947)
257:, 2 S.C.R. 181 (22 June 1981),
16:Decision by the Ontario High Court
14:
173:. Thomson Carswell. p. 738.
169:Rotman, Elman & Gall (2008).
1:
251:Seneca College v. Bhadauria
231:Seneca College v. Bhadauria
331:
305:1945 in Canadian case law
315:Discrimination in Canada
55:United Nations Charter
241:(Ontario, Canada)
44:, and Charles Dubin.
133:. December 28, 2017.
34:restrictive covenant
26:Ontario High Court
217:978-0-88920-306-8
155:978-0-88920-306-8
95:In 1979, Justice
322:
300:Ontario case law
275:Re Drummond Wren
262:
248:
242:
228:
222:
221:
199:
193:
192:
166:
160:
159:
141:
135:
134:
131:The Toronto Star
123:
21:Re Drummond Wren
330:
329:
325:
324:
323:
321:
320:
319:
310:1945 in Ontario
290:
289:
271:
266:
265:
249:
245:
239:Court of Appeal
229:
225:
218:
201:
200:
196:
181:
168:
167:
163:
156:
143:
142:
138:
125:
124:
120:
115:
77:
50:
42:Jacob Finkelman
17:
12:
11:
5:
328:
326:
318:
317:
312:
307:
302:
292:
291:
286:
285:
279:1945 CanLII 80
270:
269:External links
267:
264:
263:
255:1981 CanLII 29
243:
235:1979 CanLII 71
223:
216:
194:
179:
161:
154:
136:
117:
116:
114:
111:
89:Noble v. Alley
76:
73:
49:
46:
30:Justice Mackay
28:, presided by
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
327:
316:
313:
311:
308:
306:
303:
301:
298:
297:
295:
288:
284:
280:
276:
273:
272:
268:
260:
259:Supreme Court
256:
252:
247:
244:
240:
236:
232:
227:
224:
219:
213:
209:
205:
198:
195:
190:
186:
182:
180:9780779816804
176:
172:
165:
162:
157:
151:
147:
140:
137:
132:
128:
122:
119:
112:
110:
108:
107:
102:
101:Drummond Wren
98:
97:Bertha Wilson
93:
91:
90:
84:
82:
81:Drummond Wren
74:
72:
68:
64:
63:
59:
57:
56:
47:
45:
43:
39:
35:
31:
27:
23:
22:
287:
274:
250:
246:
230:
226:
207:
203:
197:
170:
164:
145:
139:
130:
121:
104:
100:
94:
87:
85:
80:
78:
69:
65:
61:
60:
53:
51:
20:
19:
18:
283:Ont. H.C.J.
38:Bora Laskin
294:Categories
113:References
189:236549569
106:Bhadauria
75:Aftermath
261:(Canada)
277:,
253:,
233:,
103:in the
214:
187:
177:
152:
48:Ruling
212:ISBN
185:OCLC
175:ISBN
150:ISBN
206:".
296::
183:.
129:.
92:.
40:,
220:.
191:.
158:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.