97:. Specifically, the UCC has replaced the Restatement (Second) of Contracts in regard to the sale of goods. The Restatement (Second) of Contracts remains the unofficial authority for aspects of contract law which find their genesis in the common law principles of the United States and, previously, England.
65:
Legal scholars and jurists have commented extensively on the
Restatement, both in contrasting it with aspects of the first Restatement, and in evaluating its influence and effectiveness in reaching its stated objectives. It is in this context of
73:
Although several sections of the
Restatement contained new rules which sometimes contradicted existing law, courts citing these sections have predominantly adopted the Restatement's view, citing them as a court would cite statute or code.
77:
Far more common, however, is the practice of citing the
Restatement to clarify generally accepted doctrine in every major area of contract and commercial law. It is in this context of
134:: "Restatement (Second) of Contracts § ___ (Am. L. Inst. 1981)." The Bluebook: A Uniform System of Citation § 12.8.5 (Columbia Law Review Ass'n et al. eds., 17th ed. 2000)
93:
Although the
Restatement of Contracts is still an influential academic work, certain aspects have been superseded in everyday legal practice by the
70:
that one can find numerous arguments both favoring and criticizing some aspects of the
Restatement as an independent source of legal scholarship.
182:
309:
157:
290:
Contracts: Expanded
Application of Promissory Estoppel in Restatement of Contracts Section 90: Hoffman v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.
50:
began work on the second edition in 1962 and completed it in 1979; the version in use at present has a copyright year of 1981.
314:
319:
94:
24:
54:
47:
112:
39:
106:
82:
38:. Every first-year law student in the United States is exposed to it, and it is a frequently cited
178:
153:
265:
Ipse Dixit: The
Restatement (Second) of Contracts and the Modern Development of Contract Law
212:
Legal
Realism or Legal Fiction? Impracticability Under the Restatement (Second) of Contracts
31:
common law. It is one of the best-recognized and frequently cited legal treatises in all of
197:
Interpretation and Legal Effect in the Second "Restatement of
Contracts" Robert Braucher
146:
264:
303:
35:
32:
251:
The
Restatement (Second): Its Misleading Quality and a Proposal for Its Amelioration
85:, to validate the arguments and interpretations of individual legal practitioners.
43:
131:
28:
277:
Restitution in the Second "Restatement of Contracts"Joseph M. Perillo
27:, and seeks to inform judges and lawyers about general principles of
81:
that one can find the Restatement used as direct substantiation and
148:
Ideology and Community in the First Wave of Critical Legal Studies
53:
For an explanation of the purpose of a restatement of law, see
46:
in the areas of contracts and commercial transactions. The
238:
The Codification of Contract Law in the Twentieth Century
175:
Contract Law: Casebooks for the Common Law of Europe
145:
23:is a legal treatise from the second series of the
225:Offer and Acceptance in the Second Restatement
8:
21:Restatement (Second) of the Law of Contracts
294:, Vol. 65, No. 2 (Dec., 1966), pp. 351-358
201:, Vol. 81, No. 1 (Jan., 1981), pp. 13-18
281:, Vol. 81, No. 1 (Jan., 1981), pp. 37-51
152:. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
123:
130:Acceptable citation format under the
7:
16:Widely cited American legal treatise
268:, 66 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 508 (1998).
14:
240:, 88 Dick. L. Rev. 289 (1984).
1:
253:, 13 Pepp. L. Rev. 23 (1985).
336:
310:United States contract law
227:, 74 Yale L.J. 302 (1964).
214:, 87 Com. L.J. 289 (1982).
144:Bauman, Richard (2002).
95:Uniform Commercial Code
25:Restatements of the Law
55:Restatement of the Law
48:American Law Institute
113:Corpus Juris Secundum
40:non-binding authority
315:1979 in American law
177:. Oxford: Hart Pub.
173:Beale, Hugh (2002).
107:Arthur Linton Corbin
83:persuasive authority
292:Michigan Law Review
279:Columbia Law Review
199:Columbia Law Review
262:Gregory E. Maggs,
61:Use and commentary
184:978-1-84113-237-2
327:
295:
288:
282:
275:
269:
260:
254:
247:
241:
234:
228:
221:
215:
208:
202:
195:
189:
188:
170:
164:
163:
151:
141:
135:
128:
109:, first reporter
335:
334:
330:
329:
328:
326:
325:
324:
320:Legal treatises
300:
299:
298:
289:
285:
276:
272:
261:
257:
248:
244:
235:
231:
222:
218:
209:
205:
196:
192:
185:
172:
171:
167:
160:
143:
142:
138:
129:
125:
121:
103:
91:
63:
42:in all of U.S.
17:
12:
11:
5:
333:
331:
323:
322:
317:
312:
302:
301:
297:
296:
283:
270:
255:
242:
229:
216:
203:
190:
183:
165:
158:
136:
122:
120:
117:
116:
115:
110:
102:
99:
90:
87:
79:legal research
62:
59:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
332:
321:
318:
316:
313:
311:
308:
307:
305:
293:
287:
284:
280:
274:
271:
267:
266:
259:
256:
252:
246:
243:
239:
233:
230:
226:
220:
217:
213:
207:
204:
200:
194:
191:
186:
180:
176:
169:
166:
161:
159:0-8020-8341-2
155:
150:
149:
140:
137:
133:
127:
124:
118:
114:
111:
108:
105:
104:
100:
98:
96:
88:
86:
84:
80:
75:
71:
69:
68:direct review
60:
58:
56:
51:
49:
45:
41:
37:
36:jurisprudence
34:
30:
26:
22:
291:
286:
278:
273:
263:
258:
250:
245:
237:
232:
224:
219:
211:
206:
198:
193:
174:
168:
147:
139:
126:
92:
78:
76:
72:
67:
64:
52:
20:
18:
304:Categories
119:References
44:common law
223:Braucher,
132:Bluebook
101:See also
33:American
29:contract
210:Jacobs,
249:Keyes,
236:Kelly,
181:
156:
89:Legacy
179:ISBN
154:ISBN
19:The
306::
57:.
187:.
162:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.