243:
160:
Back at the House of Lords, the Inland
Revenue accepted that wages in lieu of holiday had to be paid, but that the more generous procedure for claiming under ERA 1996 was not open, because the definition of wages in s 27 was comprehensive and did not cover working time claims. It was deliberately
124:
Workers were not paid for annual leave because they had had long-term illnesses. They requested that they be paid the holiday wage, which they could not take because they had been sick. One asked if she could take annual leave that she missed before, after she returned to work. The rest had been
151:
The
European Court of Justice held that legislation cannot allow that the right to take paid leave is extinguished at the end of the year if the worker does not work because of sickness. If employment is terminated then a worker is entitled to get an allowance of lieu according to Art 7(2). The
173:
regulation 14 was a sum payable to a worker in connection with employment, clearly within ERA 1996 s 27(1) and ‘holiday pay’ was there specifically. If it were not so, the principle of equivalence - that a no less favourable remedy would be available in national law as for EU law - would be
142:
The Court of Appeal held that a claim for deduction of holiday pay could not be brought as an unauthorised deduction from wages under ERA 1996, applying WTR rr 13 and 14. The House of Lords in
Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Ainsworth IRLR 465 referred the question to the ECJ.
125:
dismissed. They were all refused requests for pay for holidays, the lady who returned because the law said three months after the year in which the leave fell. They made a claim for unauthorised deductions under the
432:
IRLR 959 (C-277/08) the CFI held provided that employees who fall sufficiently ill before/whilst on holiday are entitled to insist that "missed" holiday be 'reinstated' and taken at a later date.
778:
389:
152:
purpose of the
Directive, one of the most important social rights for workers, was to allow a period of rest and it was legitimate that if one was actually ill, there was no rest.
374:
506:
165:, regulation 30, which gives a time limit of three months only for each individual deduction, was not the only claim, and an action could be brought under the
788:
303:
798:
773:
536:
736:
203:
753:
511:
406:
273:
129:
sections 13 (the right) and 23 (a limit of three months since last deduction, but workers can claim for the whole of the deductions).
660:
617:
483:
258:
793:
690:
550:
335:
783:
560:
545:
228:
170:
162:
113:
350:
541:
361:
166:
126:
720:
555:
492:
52:
436:
700:
613:
428:
196:
665:
521:
422:
288:
109:
78:
644:
640:
622:
340:
325:
310:
293:
278:
263:
248:
626:
594:
476:
219:
741:
189:
101:
695:
675:
635:
599:
590:
581:
608:
232:
680:
631:
603:
585:
705:
565:
469:
395:
364:
767:
670:
417:
105:
715:
685:
380:
97:
48:
516:
17:
710:
531:
526:
461:
181:
161:
never amended. Lord Rodger, Lord Walker and Lord
Neuberger held that the
465:
185:
391:
Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and
Learning Act 2009
729:
653:
574:
499:
72:
64:
59:
44:
36:
31:
376:Russell v Transocean International Resources Ltd
779:Court of Justice of the European Union case law
94:Schultz-Hoff v Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund
477:
197:
8:
88:Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v Stringer
484:
470:
462:
204:
190:
182:
28:
305:Robinson-Steele v RD Retail Services Ltd
449:
7:
737:Legal services in the United Kingdom
407:Working time in the United Kingdom
25:
321:HM Revenue and Customs v Stringer
259:Pfeiffer v Deutsches Rotes Kreuz
789:2009 in United Kingdom case law
799:European Union labour case law
774:United Kingdom labour case law
336:Landeshauptstadt Kiel v Jaeger
1:
229:Working Time Regulations 1998
171:Working Time Regulations 1998
163:Working Time Regulations 1998
114:Working Time Regulations 1998
351:Barber v RJB Mining (UK) Ltd
112:, which is relevant for the
754:United Kingdom law category
274:Commission v United Kingdom
815:
618:English administrative law
437:Lyons v Mitie Security Ltd
362:Employment Rights Act 1996
167:Employment Rights Act 1996
127:Employment Rights Act 1996
750:
507:Parliamentary sovereignty
493:Law of the United Kingdom
429:Pereda v Madrid Movilidad
403:
387:
371:
359:
347:
332:
317:
300:
285:
270:
255:
240:
226:
217:
147:European Court of Justice
77:
40:European Court of Justice
645:English civil procedure
522:Law of Northern Ireland
212:Sources on working time
794:HM Revenue and Customs
661:British Virgin Islands
423:Working Time Directive
289:R v DTI ex parte BECTU
169:. A payment under the
110:Working Time Directive
79:Working Time Directive
784:House of Lords cases
627:English criminal law
595:English contract law
220:Directive 2003/88/EC
108:case concerning the
102:European labour law
51:, IRLR 214 (also,
636:English family law
512:Constitutional law
761:
760:
742:British penal law
413:
412:
84:
83:
16:(Redirected from
806:
721:English case law
604:English land law
586:English tort law
486:
479:
472:
463:
457:
454:
392:
377:
306:
206:
199:
192:
183:
29:
21:
814:
813:
809:
808:
807:
805:
804:
803:
764:
763:
762:
757:
746:
725:
706:Anglo-Saxon law
654:Related systems
649:
575:Parallel fields
570:
566:Retained EU law
551:Competition law
537:Civil liberties
495:
490:
460:
455:
451:
447:
414:
409:
399:
390:
383:
375:
367:
355:
343:
328:
313:
304:
296:
281:
266:
251:
236:
222:
213:
210:
180:
158:
149:
140:
138:Court of Appeal
135:
122:
32:Stringer v HMRC
23:
22:
18:Stringer v HMRC
15:
12:
11:
5:
812:
810:
802:
801:
796:
791:
786:
781:
776:
766:
765:
759:
758:
751:
748:
747:
745:
744:
739:
733:
731:
727:
726:
724:
723:
718:
713:
708:
703:
698:
693:
688:
683:
678:
676:European Union
673:
668:
663:
657:
655:
651:
650:
648:
647:
638:
629:
620:
611:
606:
597:
588:
578:
576:
572:
571:
569:
568:
563:
561:Commercial law
558:
553:
548:
546:insolvency law
539:
534:
529:
524:
519:
514:
509:
503:
501:
497:
496:
491:
489:
488:
481:
474:
466:
459:
458:
448:
446:
443:
442:
441:
433:
425:
420:
411:
410:
404:
401:
400:
388:
385:
384:
372:
369:
368:
360:
357:
356:
348:
345:
344:
333:
330:
329:
318:
315:
314:
301:
298:
297:
286:
283:
282:
271:
268:
267:
256:
253:
252:
241:
238:
237:
227:
224:
223:
218:
215:
214:
211:
209:
208:
201:
194:
186:
179:
176:
157:
156:House of Lords
154:
148:
145:
139:
136:
134:
131:
121:
118:
82:
81:
75:
74:
70:
69:
66:
62:
61:
57:
56:
46:
42:
41:
38:
34:
33:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
811:
800:
797:
795:
792:
790:
787:
785:
782:
780:
777:
775:
772:
771:
769:
756:
755:
749:
743:
740:
738:
735:
734:
732:
728:
722:
719:
717:
714:
712:
709:
707:
704:
702:
701:United States
699:
697:
694:
692:
689:
687:
684:
682:
679:
677:
674:
672:
669:
667:
664:
662:
659:
658:
656:
652:
646:
642:
639:
637:
633:
630:
628:
624:
621:
619:
615:
612:
610:
607:
605:
601:
598:
596:
592:
589:
587:
583:
580:
579:
577:
573:
567:
564:
562:
559:
557:
554:
552:
549:
547:
543:
540:
538:
535:
533:
530:
528:
525:
523:
520:
518:
515:
513:
510:
508:
505:
504:
502:
500:Common fields
498:
494:
487:
482:
480:
475:
473:
468:
467:
464:
453:
450:
444:
439:
438:
434:
431:
430:
426:
424:
421:
419:
418:UK labour law
416:
415:
408:
402:
397:
393:
386:
382:
379:
378:
370:
366:
363:
358:
353:
352:
346:
342:
338:
337:
331:
327:
323:
322:
316:
312:
308:
307:
299:
295:
291:
290:
284:
280:
276:
275:
269:
265:
261:
260:
254:
250:
246:
245:
244:SIMAP v CSCGV
239:
234:
230:
225:
221:
216:
207:
202:
200:
195:
193:
188:
187:
184:
177:
175:
172:
168:
164:
155:
153:
146:
144:
137:
132:
130:
128:
119:
117:
115:
111:
107:
106:UK labour law
103:
99:
96:
95:
90:
89:
80:
76:
71:
67:
63:
58:
55:and C-350/06)
54:
50:
47:
43:
39:
35:
30:
27:
19:
752:
582:Scots delict
456:EWCA Civ 441
452:
435:
427:
373:
349:
334:
320:
319:
302:
287:
272:
257:
242:
233:SI 1998/1833
159:
150:
141:
123:
93:
92:
87:
86:
85:
68:EWCA Civ 441
65:Prior action
60:Case history
26:
696:New Zealand
517:English law
174:infringed.
768:Categories
711:Common law
556:Labour law
681:Hong Kong
666:Australia
532:Welsh law
527:Scots law
45:Citations
730:See also
440:IRLR 288
365:ss 50-70
341:C-151/02
326:C-520/06
311:C-131/04
294:C-173/99
279:C-484/04
264:C-397/01
249:C-303/98
178:See also
133:Judgment
73:Keywords
53:C-520/06
691:Ireland
542:Company
381:UKSC 57
354:ICR 679
339:(2003)
324:(2009)
309:(2006)
292:(2001)
277:(2006)
262:(2005)
247:(2000)
98:UKHL 31
49:UKHL 31
716:Equity
671:Canada
609:Trusts
686:India
641:Scots
632:Scots
623:Scots
614:Scots
600:Scots
591:Scots
445:Notes
120:Facts
100:is a
37:Court
643:and
634:and
625:and
616:and
602:and
593:and
584:and
544:and
405:see
396:c 22
104:and
91:and
770::
116:.
485:e
478:t
471:v
398:)
394:(
235:)
231:(
205:e
198:t
191:v
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.