Knowledge (XXG)

Suckers (book)

Source đź“ť

246:, described the book as a "potted history of alternative medicine, as well as a thorough rebuttal of it, and her research is both fascinating and illuminating." Haynes said that Shapiro harbored the greatest anger for "snake-oil merchants who knowingly prey on the weak", in particular those with terminal cancer. 296:
said that although he shared Shapiro's "general skepticism" and found the book an "interesting read" he noted two weaknesses. Singh said Shapiro takes a "very aggressive stance against alternative medicine" using a title that is designed to be hostile and second, that she "tends to focus on the truly
285:
was a "troubling book" filled with horror stories of alternative practitioners where Shapiro "takes a delight in exposing alternative medicine's wackier tenets". Laing said the book's title "casts consumers as gullible and practitioners as vampiric in a way that many will find intensely irritating"
263:
called the book a "ferocious assault" on proponents of alternative medicine that was a "bracing tonic" but he criticized the tone of the writing for its "sneery arrogance that (as with the Ayurvedic tradition) can only bother to caricature its few substantial foes."
27: 179:. Shapiro said that alternative medicine should be under “the same strictures as the pharmaceutical industry” and not be permitted to refer to treatments as 'food supplements'. She advised better enforcement of the 297:
wacky end of the alternative spectrum" and does not "devote enough space to more complex and subtle issues surrounding some of the more sensible forms of alternative medicine."
183:, to protect patients from unscrupulous providers, and said the government should stop subsidizing universities that cover alternative medicine in their curriculum. 286:
while both books harbor "an acute awareness of the need for medicine to be evidence-based, a belief shared by the more sensible alternative practitioners."
523: 432: 327: 373: 103: 513: 528: 518: 344: 457: 176: 172: 273: 152: 131: 55: 212:
as a "vigorous polemic" against alternative medicine with the key theme that its practices (such as
378: 232: 483: 323: 315: 110: 98: 258: 253: 223: 236:
and said that Shapiro “expertly describes the pathology of medical counter knowledge".
400: 239: 139: 65: 507: 409: 349: 278: 243: 217: 205: 147: 135: 37: 160:
style. It provides substantial detail regarding alternative treatments offered to
289: 249: 143: 213: 180: 168: 26: 117: 405:"Suckers: How Alternative Medicine Makes Fools Of Us All by Rose Shapiro" 157: 161: 404: 318:
Suckers : How Alternative Medicine Makes Fools of Us All
111: 20:
Suckers: How alternative medicine makes fools of us all
127:
Suckers: How Alternative Medicine Makes Fools of Us All
109: 97: 89: 81: 71: 61: 51: 43: 33: 8: 156:, but is written in a more journalistic and 19: 142:in 2008. It covers very similar ground to 25: 18: 194:was reviewed by several writers in 2008. 458:"Quacks on the rack (review of Suckers)" 220:) are "not just stupid but dangerous." 134:written by author and health journalist 322:. London: Harvill Secker. p. 258. 306: 175:and said it should be removed from the 433:"Paperback: Suckers, by Rose Shapiro" 372:Thompson, Damien (11 February 2008). 7: 167:In the book, Shapiro stressed that 14: 482:Singh, Simon (29 February 2008). 343:Poole, Steven (9 February 2008). 524:Scientific skepticism mass media 431:Tonkin, Boyd (14 March 2008). 1: 456:Laing, Olivia (3 May 2008). 545: 374:"Making quackery credible" 24: 16:2008 book by Rose Shapiro 177:National Health Service 173:evidence-based medicine 514:2008 non-fiction books 314:Shapiro, Rose (2008). 138:. It was published by 267:In a joint review of 529:Harvill Secker books 519:Alternative medicine 294:Trick or Treatment?, 132:alternative medicine 56:Alternative medicine 379:The Daily Telegraph 274:Trick or Treatment? 233:The Daily Telegraph 153:Trick or Treatment? 21: 484:"Poor alternative" 329:978-1-84655-028-7 123: 122: 82:Publication place 536: 498: 497: 495: 494: 479: 473: 472: 470: 468: 453: 447: 446: 444: 443: 428: 422: 421: 419: 417: 403:(4 March 2008). 397: 391: 390: 388: 386: 369: 363: 362: 360: 358: 340: 334: 333: 311: 130:is a book about 113: 73:Publication date 29: 22: 544: 543: 539: 538: 537: 535: 534: 533: 504: 503: 502: 501: 492: 490: 488:Financial Times 481: 480: 476: 466: 464: 455: 454: 450: 441: 439: 437:The Independent 430: 429: 425: 415: 413: 401:Haynes, Natalie 399: 398: 394: 384: 382: 371: 370: 366: 356: 354: 342: 341: 337: 330: 313: 312: 308: 303: 292:, co-author of 259:The Independent 254:literary editor 224:Damian Thompson 189: 74: 17: 12: 11: 5: 542: 540: 532: 531: 526: 521: 516: 506: 505: 500: 499: 474: 448: 423: 392: 364: 335: 328: 305: 304: 302: 299: 240:Natalie Haynes 188: 185: 140:Harvill Secker 121: 120: 115: 107: 106: 101: 95: 94: 91: 87: 86: 85:United Kingdom 83: 79: 78: 75: 72: 69: 68: 66:Harvill Secker 63: 59: 58: 53: 49: 48: 45: 41: 40: 35: 31: 30: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 541: 530: 527: 525: 522: 520: 517: 515: 512: 511: 509: 489: 485: 478: 475: 463: 459: 452: 449: 438: 434: 427: 424: 412: 411: 406: 402: 396: 393: 381: 380: 375: 368: 365: 352: 351: 346: 339: 336: 331: 325: 321: 320: 317: 310: 307: 300: 298: 295: 291: 287: 284: 280: 276: 275: 270: 265: 262: 260: 255: 251: 247: 245: 242:, writing in 241: 237: 235: 234: 229: 225: 221: 219: 215: 211: 207: 204: 200: 195: 193: 186: 184: 182: 178: 174: 170: 165: 163: 159: 155: 154: 149: 145: 141: 137: 133: 129: 128: 119: 116: 114: 108: 105: 104:0-09-952286-1 102: 100: 96: 92: 88: 84: 80: 76: 70: 67: 64: 60: 57: 54: 50: 46: 42: 39: 36: 32: 28: 23: 491:. Retrieved 487: 477: 465:. Retrieved 462:The Guardian 461: 451: 440:. Retrieved 436: 426: 414:. Retrieved 410:New Humanist 408: 395: 383:. Retrieved 377: 367: 355:. Retrieved 350:The Guardian 348: 345:"Quack work" 338: 319: 316: 309: 293: 288: 282: 279:Olivia Laing 272: 268: 266: 257: 248: 244:New Humanist 238: 231: 227: 222: 218:ear candling 209: 206:Steven Poole 202: 199:The Guardian 198: 197:Writing for 196: 191: 190: 166: 151: 148:Edzard Ernst 136:Rose Shapiro 126: 125: 124: 38:Rose Shapiro 290:Simon Singh 252:, then the 250:Boyd Tonkin 201:in February 144:Simon Singh 508:Categories 493:2023-04-02 442:2023-04-02 301:References 214:homeopathy 208:described 181:Cancer Act 169:homeopathy 164:patients. 226:reviewed 187:Reception 158:polemical 118:190777228 62:Publisher 467:10 April 416:10 April 353:. London 171:was not 150:'s book 44:Language 385:1 March 283:Suckers 269:Suckers 228:Suckers 210:Suckers 192:Suckers 52:Subject 47:English 357:24 May 326:  162:cancer 34:Author 281:said 90:Pages 469:2016 418:2016 387:2012 359:2010 324:ISBN 271:and 256:for 230:for 216:and 146:and 112:OCLC 99:ISBN 77:2008 93:304 510:: 486:. 460:. 435:. 407:. 376:. 347:. 277:, 496:. 471:. 445:. 420:. 389:. 361:. 332:. 261:, 203:,

Index


Rose Shapiro
Alternative medicine
Harvill Secker
ISBN
0-09-952286-1
OCLC
190777228
alternative medicine
Rose Shapiro
Harvill Secker
Simon Singh
Edzard Ernst
Trick or Treatment?
polemical
cancer
homeopathy
evidence-based medicine
National Health Service
Cancer Act
Steven Poole
homeopathy
ear candling
Damian Thompson
The Daily Telegraph
Natalie Haynes
New Humanist
Boyd Tonkin
literary editor
The Independent

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑