Knowledge (XXG)

S v Dlamini (2012)

Source 📝

22: 235:
At 7:00pm one evening in 2002, three women were meeting at the residence of one of them in order to travel to church together. Two of the women were already in the car, ready to leave, when the third woman arrived in her own vehicle. She got out of her vehicle and as she began walking towards the car
272:
As to whether there had been a duplication of convictions in respect of the three counts of robbery, Majiedt JA held for the majority (Van Heerden JA and Snyders JA concurring, and Farlam JA and Cachalia JA dissenting) that there had been a separate intent by the three robbers to rob each of the
240:
at her. They demanded that the women hand over their possessions, and also the keys to both cars. The men then took both vehicles and drove away. The appellant was found in possession of a firearm and ammunition three days later, but the firearm could not be definitely linked to the robbery.
263:
A further appeal against the sentence to the SCA, was made on the grounds that there had been a duplication of convictions, as the three robbery charges arose from actions committed with a single intent in a continuous transaction.
252:. The three counts of robbery and the firearm offences were committed in 2002. The theft of the car was an older charge from 1999. He was sentenced to serve a total of 45 years' imprisonment. 219:. He was one of three perpetrators, one of whom was armed and had threatened a group of three women. The robbers had taken the women's property and departed. A 3-2 majority of the 464: 459: 454: 297: 260:
On appeal to the high court, the conviction for the theft of the car in 1999 was set aside and the sentence reduced to 43 years' imprisonment.
220: 129: 245: 39: 293: 105: 86: 58: 43: 301: 65: 72: 32: 224: 54: 227:
by the robbers to rob each woman. There had, therefore, been no inappropriate duplication of convictions.
169: 415: 277: 249: 79: 448: 209: 21: 338: 244:
The appellant was convicted in a regional court of three counts of robbery,
216: 236:
in the driveway, three men in overalls moved towards it and pointed a
212:
court case. The central question was of duplication of convictions.
276:
The convictions were upheld, but the sentences were ordered to run
215:
The accused had been charged with and convicted on three counts of
237: 184:
Farlam JA, Van Heerden JA, Cachalia JA, Snyders JA, Majiedt JA
15: 280:, so the actual imprisonment was reduced to seventeen years. 328:
2001 (1) SACR 469 (SCA) (2001 (2) SA 1222; 3 All SA 220).
416:"Two for one – Duplicate convictions for one crime" 193: 188: 180: 175: 165: 160: 145: 135: 125: 120: 46:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. 246:possession of an unlicensed firearm and ammunition 290:National Director of Public Prosecutions v King 8: 273:three women which was executed separately. 117: 106:Learn how and when to remove this message 354:2008 (1) SACR 431 (SCA) ( 2 All SA 257). 348:2009 (1) SACR 552 (SCA) ( 4 All SA 396). 322:2001 (2) SACR 118 (SCA) ( 4 All SA 365). 316:2009 (1) SACR 244 (SCA) ( 4 All SA 207). 374: 7: 409: 407: 405: 44:adding citations to reliable sources 364:Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977. 14: 465:March 2012 events in South Africa 20: 460:South African criminal case law 31:needs additional citations for 455:2012 in South African case law 414:Miller, Michael (2013-02-01). 1: 223:found that there had been a 481: 308:S v Dos Santos and Another 352:S v Whitehead and Others 334:2009 (1) SACR 509 (SCA). 310:2010 (2) SACR 382 (SCA). 149:27 March 2012 130:Supreme Court of Appeal 55:"S v Dlamini" 2012 381:2012 (2) SACR 1 (SCA). 170:KwaZulu-Natal Division 342:1982 (1) SA 844 (A). 296:146 (SCA) (2010 (7) 40:improve this article 201: 200: 116: 115: 108: 90: 472: 439: 436: 430: 429: 427: 426: 411: 400: 397: 391: 390:Case No. 362/11. 388: 382: 379: 176:Court membership 156: 154: 118: 111: 104: 100: 97: 91: 89: 48: 24: 16: 480: 479: 475: 474: 473: 471: 470: 469: 445: 444: 443: 442: 437: 433: 424: 422: 413: 412: 403: 398: 394: 389: 385: 380: 376: 371: 361: 286: 270: 258: 233: 225:separate intent 152: 150: 112: 101: 95: 92: 49: 47: 37: 25: 12: 11: 5: 478: 476: 468: 467: 462: 457: 447: 446: 441: 440: 431: 401: 392: 383: 373: 372: 370: 367: 366: 365: 360: 357: 356: 355: 349: 343: 335: 329: 323: 317: 314:S v Egglestone 311: 305: 285: 282: 269: 266: 257: 254: 250:theft of a car 232: 229: 199: 198: 195: 191: 190: 186: 185: 182: 181:Judges sitting 178: 177: 173: 172: 167: 163: 162: 158: 157: 147: 143: 142: 137: 136:Full case name 133: 132: 127: 123: 122: 114: 113: 28: 26: 19: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 477: 466: 463: 461: 458: 456: 453: 452: 450: 435: 432: 421: 417: 410: 408: 406: 402: 396: 393: 387: 384: 378: 375: 368: 363: 362: 358: 353: 350: 347: 344: 341: 340: 336: 333: 330: 327: 324: 321: 318: 315: 312: 309: 306: 303: 299: 295: 291: 288: 287: 284:Related cases 283: 281: 279: 274: 267: 265: 261: 255: 253: 251: 247: 242: 239: 230: 228: 226: 222: 218: 213: 211: 210:South African 207: 206: 196: 192: 189:Case opinions 187: 183: 179: 174: 171: 168: 166:Appealed from 164: 159: 148: 144: 141: 138: 134: 131: 128: 124: 119: 110: 107: 99: 96:November 2021 88: 85: 81: 78: 74: 71: 67: 64: 60: 57: –  56: 52: 51:Find sources: 45: 41: 35: 34: 29:This article 27: 23: 18: 17: 434: 423:. Retrieved 419: 395: 386: 377: 351: 346:S v Vilakazi 345: 337: 331: 325: 319: 313: 307: 289: 278:concurrently 275: 271: 262: 259: 243: 234: 214: 204: 203: 202: 161:Case history 140:S v Dlamini 139: 102: 93: 83: 76: 69: 62: 50: 38:Please help 33:verification 30: 205:S v Dlamini 194:Decision by 121:S v Dlamini 449:Categories 425:2021-11-28 369:References 339:S v Moloto 332:S v Maneli 326:S v Malgas 320:S v Fourie 231:Background 197:Majiedt JA 153:2012-03-27 66:newspapers 399:ZASCA 26. 292:2010 (2) 438:Para 51. 420:De Rebus 359:Statutes 300:656; 3 268:Judgment 256:Appeals 217:robbery 151: ( 146:Decided 80:scholar 302:All SA 248:, and 208:was a 82:  75:  68:  61:  53:  304:304). 126:Court 87:JSTOR 73:books 298:BCLR 294:SACR 59:news 238:gun 221:SCA 42:by 451:: 418:. 404:^ 428:. 155:) 109:) 103:( 98:) 94:( 84:· 77:· 70:· 63:· 36:.

Index


verification
improve this article
adding citations to reliable sources
"S v Dlamini" 2012
news
newspapers
books
scholar
JSTOR
Learn how and when to remove this message
Supreme Court of Appeal
KwaZulu-Natal Division
South African
robbery
SCA
separate intent
gun
possession of an unlicensed firearm and ammunition
theft of a car
concurrently
SACR
BCLR
All SA
S v Moloto



"Two for one – Duplicate convictions for one crime"
Categories

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.