287:
226:
the SEC authority to implement "Say on Pay" regulations at all companies, not only those that have outstanding funds from the TARP, contingent on
Congressional approval. Additionally, the Treasury reconciled its proposals from February 4 with Congressional amendments to the EESA in the Final Interim Rule on TARP Standards for Compensation and Corporate Governance.
230:
shareholder vote on golden parachutes. In the Senate, Senator
Charles Schumer introduced the Shareholder Bill of Rights. The House and Senate bills were reconciled in a final bill that was signed by President Obama on July 21, 2010, called The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.
225:
stated that companies that have received exceptional financial recovery assistance from the TARP fund would have to subject executive compensation to "Say on Pay" resolutions. On June 10, 2009, Secretary
Geithner stated that the Administration supports "Say on Pay" legislation, and it would authorize
69:
On the 3rd of March, the Swiss voted by 69.7 per cent to ensure shareholders, pension funds and not banks, entirely control questions of executive pay. Shareholders must elect all members of a company's remuneration committee of all Swiss public listed companies. They further should receive annual
152:
is necessary to approve a director’s contract lasting more than a 2-year term (reduced from approval beyond a 5-year term under the old
Companies Act 1985, section 319). Lastly, frivolous categories of compensation are limited under section 215, by prohibiting payments for loss of office (i.e. no
229:
On July 31, 2009, H.R. 3269, the "Corporate and
Financial Institution Compensation Fairness Act of 2009" passed the House of Representatives. The House bill included a section that allowed for a "say on pay" for all public institutions in the United States. Additionally, it had a provision for a
273:
In 2017, Directive (EU) 2017/828 (Shareholders Right
Directive II) has taken some revolutionary steps in that matter in aim to eliminate practices based on short term gains. With transposition having its deadline on June 10, 2019, the directive introduced remunerative policies, which have to be
160:
Although the say on pay provision in section 439 is not binding on the board, the message in UK law is influential, because company members have an unrestricted right to fire any director, with reasonable notice, under section 168. The debate, however, moved on to whether the vote should become
27:
of executives. In the United States, this provision was ushered in when the Dodd-Frank Act Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act was passed in 2010. While Say on Pay is a non-binding, advisory vote, failure reflects shareholder dissatisfaction with executive pay or company performance.
451:
predicted that a "say on pay" could hold back sudden jumps, but it would not stop the general upward drift in pay rates. Ryan Krause and colleagues argued that "say on pay" offered little information to the board of directors beyond disapproval of CEO compensation not being in line with firm
51:
Critics of the policy believe that “say on pay” does not effectively or comprehensibly monitor compensation, and consider it to be a reactionary policy rather than a proactive policy because it does not immediately affect the Board of
Directors. Some argue it is counter-productive because it
398:
In the first year of mandatory shareholder advisory "say on pay" voting in the US, 37 Russell 3000 companies failed to receive majority support from shareholders. In the second year of voting, 44 Russell 3000 companies have failed as of June 12, 2012. Companies include:
406:
shareholders voted against "say on pay" in both 2011 and 2012 (75% opposition in 2012) given concerns over the company's high CEO pay and severance payments. Shareholders also voted against the company's new incentive bonus plan and long-term incentive plan in
43:
to protect the interests of the corporation. In large listed companies, executive compensation will usually be determined by a compensation committee composed of board members. Proponents argue that “say on pay” reforms strengthen the relationship between the
262:
shareholders on the remuneration policy. We do not believe a shareholder vote on the remuneration policy generally should be an EU requirement, as the effects of such a vote can be different from Member State to Member State. The important thing is that
362:
shareholders were 40% against a £15m (£1.8m cash, rest shares) payoff to
Chairman Michael Green. It was justified on the basis that he would have taken legal action were it not paid, because he was removed prior to the Carlton/Granada
369:
Managing
Director and founder of the property company had 47% of shareholders vote against his £1.2m (out of a total £4.7m package) under a long-term incentive scheme that he had not actually belonged to. (August
39:, a corporation's managers are likely to overpay themselves because, directly or indirectly, they are allowed to pay themselves as a matter of general management power. Directors are elected to a board that has a
132:
mandates a vote on director pay at the yearly accounts meeting. Directors are expected to have disclosed their remuneration package in a "Remuneration Report" (section 420). Failure to do this leads to fines.
90:
new sections 250R(2), 250U-V, so that if at two consecutive meetings over 25% of shareholders vote against the directors' remuneration package, the directors have to stand for election again in 90 days.
696:
180:
64:
356:. Chairman Sir Christopher Hogg said it was just the difference in culture to the US that was holding Britain back and they should accept it. The TUC had been lobbying pension funds. (May 2003)
218:
amended Section 111 of the EESA, and updated policy on Executive Compensation in Section 7. The amended legislation continued the "Say on Pay" policy established originally in the EESA.
83:
781:"Directive (EU) 2017/828 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2017 amending Directive 2007/36/EC as regards the encouragement of long-term shareholder engagement"
653:
329:
Incidents at large UK companies in which shareholders have "revolted" against the size of pay awards given to board members since the "say on pay" legislation was introduced.
136:
In addition, UK law regulates tightly several elements beyond basic director pay. Employee share schemes that directors have must be approved by ordinary resolution under the
342:
shareholders voted 28% against a £250,000 retention bonus for CFO Julian Hance and £1.44m severance pay for CEO Bob Mendelsohn. The share price had just dropped. (May 2003)
165:
section 79 to make the overall policy of pay capable of being rejected by shareholders, but that no specific right to determine the amount has yet been introduced.
55:
The effect of ‘say on pay’ measures can be binding or non-binding, depending on regulatory requirements or internal corporate policy as determined by proxy votes.
211:
841:
186:
There have been several recent efforts to require Say on Pay resolutions in the United States. In 2007, the Chairman of the Financial Services Committee Rep.
548:
203:
708:
912:
Krause, Ryan; Whitler, Kimberly A.; Semadeni, Matthew (1 February 2014). "Power to the Principals! An Experimental Look at Shareholder Say-On-Pay Voting".
740:
763:
162:
529:
274:
approved by the shareholders. Earnings of each director (both executive and non-executive) shall be specified in accordance with these policies.
657:
190:
sponsored legislation that was passed by the House of Representatives, giving shareholders a non-binding vote on executive compensation.
992:
391:
855:"Should Shareholders Have a Greater Say Over Executive Pay?: Learning from the Us Experience by Brian R. Cheffins, Randall S. Thomas"
976:
611:
499:
1007:
793:
598:
387:
681:
251:
has remained tentative about harmonising rules on CEO pay for a long time. In the High-Level Group of Company Law Experts'
207:
141:
637:
533:
950:
174:
109:
set a default rule that the remuneration of directors was to be set, binding, by the company's general meeting, under
805:
545:
817:
715:
366:
270:
However, a different approach is taken to share schemes, which were recommended to be more closely scrutinised.
145:
760:
586:
565:
336:
shareholders voted 10% against, and 30% in abstention from £13m in shares for CEO Sir Chris Gent. (July 2001)
339:
997:
471:
149:
829:
780:
1002:
885:
754:
448:
318:
144:, with which all listed companies must comply or explain why they do not, a binding vote on approval of
137:
87:
969:
466:
440:
259:"Some Member States require or are considering requiring, a form of a mandatory or advisory vote by
49:
32:
444:
436:
117:. Over time more and more companies gave the right to directors, which is the position found in the
386:’s salary as CEO. It was linked to the success of the firm's Fresh & Easy chain in the US. The
353:
866:
512:
461:
129:
114:
84:
Corporations Amendment (Improving Accountability on Director and Executive Remuneration) Act 2011
71:
45:
949:
B Cheffins and RS Thomas, ‘Should shareholders have a greater say over executive pay?’ (2001) 1
74:. The role that banks played in casting votes on other shareholders' behalf has been abolished.
929:
734:
403:
349:
154:
121:
for companies today, that remuneration of the directors shall be determined by the directors.
921:
858:
414:
222:
210:, required say on pay resolutions at companies with outstanding funds from the TARP. In the
202:
The economic crisis has affected corporate governance in the United States of America. The
157:), except, under section 220, in respect of damages for existing obligations and pensions.
898:
767:
685:
641:
552:
410:
383:
345:
255:
in 2002, they stated they would not wish to impose a requirement for voting EU-wide, yet.
233:
In 2012, only 2.6% of companies which voted on say on pay measures failed to pass them.
495:
248:
242:
118:
106:
100:
36:
286:
53:
986:
870:
525:
424:
317:
The Coalition Government of Germany has recently passed reforming legislation to the
198:
20:
678:
194:
191:
187:
24:
124:
The United Kingdom was the forerunner in mandating that shareholders be allowed a
359:
634:
266:
shareholders annually have the opportunity to debate the policy with the board.
215:
933:
348:
shareholders voted 50.72% (advisorily) against a £22m bonus salary and stock
197:
authored a "Say on Pay" proposal, but his legislation stalled in the Senate.
476:
420:
40:
376:
Former chairman Niall Fitzgerald got £1.2m after profits fell. (April 2005)
48:
and shareholders, ensuring that board members fulfil their fiduciary duty.
925:
373:
333:
862:
110:
854:
379:
423:
failed "say on pay" with 55% opposition in 2012 after giving CEO
964:
Institute for the governance of private and public organizations
281:
148:
is recommended. Under section 188 of the Companies Act 2006 a
794:
Shareholder revolt over planned £11.5m payout for Tesco chief
417:'s employment agreement and the company's stock performance.
23:
whereby a firm's shareholders have the right to vote on the
697:
Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
181:
Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
128:, or advisory vote on pay. In the UK, section 439 of the
963:
413:
failed a "say on pay" vote in 2011 in light of new CEO
298:
587:
David Cameron to curb 'fat cat' pay with people power
65:
Swiss referendum "against corporate Rip-offs" of 2013
52:
diminishes the authority of the Board of Directors.
382:shareholders voted 15% against an £11.5m bonus on
830:Nabors owners reject exec pay, want severance nod
183:§951, a new say on pay provision was introduced.
844:, Semler Brossy Consulting Group, April 25, 2012
654:"Geithner: 'Say on Pay,' No Caps - BusinessWeek"
427:three retention grants valued at $ 27.9 million.
546:Say On Pay = New tool of Social Responsibility?
820:, Semler Brossy Consulting Group, June 6, 2012
808:, Semler Brossy Consulting Group, June 8, 2012
212:American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
8:
204:Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008
70:votes on the identity of all members of the
753:High Level Group of Company Law Experts,
163:Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013
842:2012 Say on Pay Results (as of April 25)
221:On February 4, 2009, Treasury Secretary
161:binding. Changes were introduced in the
530:U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
487:
321:to introduce a non-binding say on pay.
894:
883:
818:2012 Say on Pay Results (as of June 6)
759:(2002) p.65; from the EU Commission's
739:: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (
732:
601:washingtonwatch.com 28 September 2008
7:
806:Four more companies fail Say on Pay
14:
970:'Candidates Target Executive Pay'
534:German Corporate Governance Codex
977:CEOs publicly against say on pay
951:Journal of Corporate Law Studies
532:(SEC) rules; in Germany see the
500:Delaware General Corporation Law
285:
589:' (8 January 2012) The Guardian
388:Association of British Insurers
325:Examples of shareholder revolts
656:. 12 June 2009. Archived from
206:(EESA), which established the
140:Listing Rule 9.4.1. Under the
113:, article 54, attached to the
1:
914:Academy of Management Journal
770:on company law modernisation.
566:Table A of the CA 1862 art 54
208:Troubled Asset Relief Program
19:is a term used for a role in
599:Taxpayers are really paying?
394:were against it. (June 2007)
142:UK Corporate Governance Code
175:United States corporate law
35:or management theory as an
1024:
993:United Kingdom company law
796:, The Times, June 30, 2007
679:U.S. Treasury News Release
635:U.S. Treasury News Release
528:A.3.1; in the US, see the
240:
172:
98:
62:
146:long-term incentive plans
524:e.g. in the UK, see the
340:Royal & Sun Alliance
832:, Reuters, June 6, 2012
585:T Helm and R Wachman, '
1008:Executive compensation
893:Cite journal requires
498:para 3; and under the
472:Executive compensation
268:
150:shareholder resolution
926:10.5465/amj.2012.0035
449:Vanderbilt University
319:Stock Corporation Act
257:
138:London Stock Exchange
88:Corporations Act 2001
494:e.g. in the UK, see
467:Corporate governance
441:Cambridge University
33:corporate governance
863:10.2139/ssrn.268992
576:Combined Code B.2.4
432:Academic skepticism
354:Jean-Pierre Garnier
31:Often described in
766:2008-02-12 at the
684:2009-06-10 at the
640:2009-05-30 at the
612:"Z:\ENROLL\H1.ENR"
551:2013-08-23 at the
513:Companies Act 2006
462:Board of directors
297:. You can help by
130:Companies Act 2006
115:Companies Act 1862
86:introduced in the
72:board of directors
46:board of directors
404:Nabors Industries
350:severance package
315:
314:
155:golden parachutes
1015:
938:
937:
909:
903:
902:
896:
891:
889:
881:
879:
877:
851:
845:
839:
833:
827:
821:
815:
809:
803:
797:
791:
785:
784:
777:
771:
751:
745:
744:
738:
730:
728:
726:
721:on 29 March 2013
720:
714:. Archived from
713:
705:
699:
694:
688:
676:
670:
669:
667:
665:
650:
644:
632:
626:
625:
623:
621:
616:
608:
602:
596:
590:
583:
577:
574:
568:
562:
556:
544:David Orisson, '
542:
536:
522:
516:
511:e.g. in the UK,
509:
503:
492:
310:
307:
289:
282:
223:Timothy Geithner
1023:
1022:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1014:
1013:
1012:
983:
982:
960:
946:
944:Further reading
941:
911:
910:
906:
892:
882:
875:
873:
853:
852:
848:
840:
836:
828:
824:
816:
812:
804:
800:
792:
788:
779:
778:
774:
768:Wayback Machine
752:
748:
731:
724:
722:
718:
711:
709:"Archived copy"
707:
706:
702:
695:
691:
686:Wayback Machine
677:
673:
663:
661:
660:on 12 June 2009
652:
651:
647:
642:Wayback Machine
633:
629:
619:
617:
614:
610:
609:
605:
597:
593:
584:
580:
575:
571:
563:
559:
553:Wayback Machine
543:
539:
523:
519:
510:
506:
493:
489:
485:
458:
434:
411:Hewlett Packard
384:Sir Terry Leahy
346:GlaxoSmithKline
327:
311:
305:
302:
295:needs expansion
280:
245:
239:
177:
171:
103:
97:
80:
67:
61:
12:
11:
5:
1021:
1019:
1011:
1010:
1005:
1000:
995:
985:
984:
981:
980:
973:
966:
959:
958:External links
956:
955:
954:
945:
942:
940:
939:
904:
895:|journal=
846:
834:
822:
810:
798:
786:
772:
746:
700:
689:
671:
645:
627:
603:
591:
578:
569:
557:
537:
517:
504:
502:, see s 141(a)
496:Model Articles
486:
484:
481:
480:
479:
474:
469:
464:
457:
454:
445:Randall Thomas
437:Brian Cheffins
433:
430:
429:
428:
418:
408:
396:
395:
377:
371:
364:
357:
343:
337:
326:
323:
313:
312:
292:
290:
279:
278:German reforms
276:
249:European Union
243:EU company law
238:
235:
170:
167:
119:Model Articles
107:UK company law
101:UK company law
96:
93:
79:
76:
63:Main article:
60:
57:
41:fiduciary duty
37:agency problem
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1020:
1009:
1006:
1004:
1001:
999:
998:Corporate law
996:
994:
991:
990:
988:
978:
974:
971:
968:Joann Lublin
967:
965:
962:
961:
957:
952:
948:
947:
943:
935:
931:
927:
923:
920:(1): 94–115.
919:
915:
908:
905:
900:
887:
872:
868:
864:
860:
856:
850:
847:
843:
838:
835:
831:
826:
823:
819:
814:
811:
807:
802:
799:
795:
790:
787:
782:
776:
773:
769:
765:
762:
758:
757:
750:
747:
742:
736:
717:
710:
704:
701:
698:
693:
690:
687:
683:
680:
675:
672:
659:
655:
649:
646:
643:
639:
636:
631:
628:
613:
607:
604:
600:
595:
592:
588:
582:
579:
573:
570:
567:
561:
558:
554:
550:
547:
541:
538:
535:
531:
527:
526:Combined Code
521:
518:
515:, ss 170, 172
514:
508:
505:
501:
497:
491:
488:
482:
478:
475:
473:
470:
468:
465:
463:
460:
459:
455:
453:
452:performance.
450:
446:
442:
438:
431:
426:
425:Vikram Pandit
422:
419:
416:
415:Léo Apotheker
412:
409:
405:
402:
401:
400:
393:
389:
385:
381:
378:
375:
372:
368:
365:
361:
358:
355:
351:
347:
344:
341:
338:
335:
332:
331:
330:
324:
322:
320:
309:
300:
296:
293:This section
291:
288:
284:
283:
277:
275:
271:
267:
264:
260:
256:
254:
250:
244:
236:
234:
231:
227:
224:
219:
217:
213:
209:
205:
200:
199:
196:
193:Then Senator
192:
189:
184:
182:
176:
168:
166:
164:
158:
156:
151:
147:
143:
139:
134:
131:
127:
122:
120:
116:
112:
108:
102:
94:
92:
89:
85:
77:
75:
73:
66:
58:
56:
54:
50:
47:
42:
38:
34:
29:
26:
22:
21:corporate law
18:
1003:Shareholders
917:
913:
907:
886:cite journal
874:. Retrieved
849:
837:
825:
813:
801:
789:
775:
756:Final Report
755:
749:
723:. Retrieved
716:the original
703:
692:
674:
662:. Retrieved
658:the original
648:
630:
618:. Retrieved
606:
594:
581:
572:
560:
540:
520:
507:
490:
435:
397:
328:
316:
306:October 2009
303:
299:adding to it
294:
272:
269:
265:
261:
258:
253:Final Report
252:
246:
232:
228:
220:
201:
195:Barack Obama
188:Barney Frank
185:
178:
159:
135:
125:
123:
104:
81:
68:
30:
25:remuneration
16:
15:
979:(July 2009)
972:(12.4.2008)
876:20 November
725:17 November
620:20 November
126:non-binding
105:Originally
59:Switzerland
987:Categories
975:USA Today
241:See also:
216:Chris Dodd
214:, Senator
173:See also:
99:See also:
17:Say on pay
934:0001-4273
871:154542843
477:Form 10-K
421:Citigroup
78:Australia
857:. SSRN.
764:Archived
735:cite web
682:Archived
638:Archived
549:Archived
456:See also
374:Unilever
352:for CEO
334:Vodafone
761:website
367:Berkley
363:merger.
179:In the
111:Table A
932:
869:
664:21 May
237:EU law
169:US law
95:UK law
867:S2CID
719:(PDF)
712:(PDF)
615:(PDF)
483:Notes
407:2012.
380:Tesco
370:2003)
930:ISSN
899:help
878:2021
741:link
727:2012
666:2023
622:2021
564:See
443:and
392:PIRC
390:and
247:The
82:The
953:277
922:doi
859:doi
447:of
439:of
360:ITV
301:.
989::
928:.
918:57
916:.
890::
888:}}
884:{{
865:.
737:}}
733:{{
936:.
924::
901:)
897:(
880:.
861::
783:.
743:)
729:.
668:.
624:.
555:'
308:)
304:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.