518:
universities) can totally be ignored. Lapworth advocates what the author believes is a model of university governance with the positive aspects of corporate and collegial approaches. The issues in university governance discussed by these literatures are detailed by
Coaldrake, Stedman, and Little (2003) through a comparative study of current trends in Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States, with poignant insight into the different models of governance for the management of higher education. Critical of the currents of change toward "corporate governance," the authors cite reference to literature that calls for "re-balancing" of university governance, maintaining that the re-balancing "would amount to a clarification of shared governance". With changing roles in human resources and the external pressures for accountability affecting university relationships internally, McMaster provides insights by defining management styles in terms of nested partnership between faculty and administration, contiguous partnership, and segmented partnership. With debates over the recent trends, university organizations, governing associations, and numerous postsecondary institutions themselves have set forth policy statements on governance.
551:
decisions, selection of administrators, preparation of the budget, and determination of educational policies. Refinements to the statement were introduced in subsequent years, culminating in the 1966 Statement on
Government of Colleges and Universities. The document does not provide for a "blueprint" for the governance of higher education. Nor was the purpose of the statement to provide principles for relations with industry and government (though it establishes direction on "the correction of existing weaknesses"). Rather, it aimed to establish a shared vision for the internal governance of institutions. Student involvement is not addressed in detail. The statement concerns general education policy and internal operations with an overview of the formal structures for organization and management. In process and structure, the meaning with the outcome is an organizational philosophy for shared governance in higher education.
658:, faculty participation in standards and curriculum, and faculty decisions on academic personnel as the AAUP first established principles of governance. The statement maintains that participation in shared governance should be extended, acknowledging that the way in which participation is expanded will vary from institution to institution; "but each group whose work contributes to the academic enterprise should be involved in a manner appropriate to institutional functions and responsibility". The policy addresses unions and faculty senates, believing that they contribute to the maintenance of shared governance in institutions as well as the role of accrediting agencies to support management standards. In conclusion, the AFT emphasizes affirmation of the goals, objectives and purpose for shared governance in higher education.
670:(AGB) issued a statement on governance, most recently updated in 2010. The original statement was published with a correlating statement, "Governing in the Public Trust: External Influences on Colleges and Universities." In the first statement on governance, the advisiory organization for institutional governance discusses facts and perceptions concerning governance, including specific facts related to institutional trends and perceptions that "internal governance arrangements have become so cumbersome that timely decisions are difficult to make". The AGB statement then defines general principles upon which governing boards are to operate and the responsibilities of a governing board to the institution; the updated principles as of 2010 are below.
930:
supposes to put on better the whole university structure : better management, transparency in the decision-making and the participation of all actors in the decision-making. The second approach of governance fundamentally questions the efficiency of the systems of functioning of universities, too much centered on the hierarchical authority of the State, and on that of the university and academic administration, whether it is to define the financing, programs, the qualifications and even the courses of training. The governance of higher education will succeed only if it allows creating a common space of meeting between the actors : political, socioeconomic, students, teaching and civil society.
842:'s university presidents, put forward a "Chancellors and AVCC statement on university governance." Given national and institutional debates over the governance of tertiary education, the statement acknowledges the opportunities with developments in management and governing structures. The statement notes the role of the "business model" that has been advanced alongside the traditional models of governance in Australia. With reference to additional "third models" in introducing a discussion of the existing frameworks for the governance of tertiary education, the statement defines the legal autonomy of institutions and independence from external
760:
the report detail the method with summary of the present state of shared governance. The findings include the state of the locus of authority and reforms as well as the analysis of the challenges facing
Liberal Arts Colleges with the pressures of the current economic climate. The preliminary results contain the raw data on the landscape of governance in higher education from a population of 1303 4-year institutions in the United States, with data compiled from both administrative structures and the faculty. The survey did not include participation from any population of students.
412:
1106:
597:
ideas and premise for the "responsibility primarily of the faculty to determine the appropriate curriculum and procedures of student instruction". In this respect, the AAUP grants that considerations should be made for publicly supported institutions. Unlike the NEA, the AAUP elaborates more on the role of governing structures, including the role of the president to ensure "sound academic practices", as the NEA suggests faculty rights to appeal flawed and improper procedures. In summation, where the AAUP discusses the
1772:, (3rd Ed.). San Francisco: Jossey Bass Publishers. (For UK law, see Farrington, D.J. & Palfreyman, D. (2012) 'The Law of Higher Education' (2nd Ed.)(Oxford University Press), as updated on-line and as supported by an on-line 'HE Casebook' at the OxCHEPS website, www.oxcheps.new.ox.ac.uk – also at the Resources page of that website see the reference to Shattock, M.L. (2008) 'Managing Good Governance in Higher Education' in the Open University Press 'Managing Universities and Colleges' series.)
846:. Acknowledging the diversity of governing structures and believing a balance is necessary between internal and external forces, the organization maintains: "No single way to achieve an effective governance arrangement" is possible. In recognizing the differences in institutional structures and frames of reference, the statement offers operational good practices as generic principles and recommendations, also identifying national protocols for the success of Australian higher education.
400:
850:
members should be appointed with their selection based on contributions "to the effective working of the governing body by having needed skills, knowledge and experience, an appreciation of the values of a university and its core activities of teaching and research, its independence and academic freedom and the capacity to appreciate the university's external community needs from that university". The committee defines the
966:
entirely applicable to the South
African context. The authors discuss the need for government "steering," an idea originally envisioned in South Africa with the democratic transition, based upon a cooperative framework as a "conditional autonomy." The goals and objectives for cooperative governance were thus established with the National Commission on Higher Education (NCHE) in 1994, detailed in its 1996 report.
749:
942:
631:(AFT) published a statement in support of the shared governance of institutions. The policy statement is a response to the fact that many governing boards have adopted the "mantra of business". The AFT iterates the purpose by which higher education achieves democratic organizational processes between administration and faculty, believing shared governance is under attack in six ways:
769:
455:"Governance" is defined by Kezar and Eckel as the macro-level of policy decision making. Kezar and Eckel suggest governance is a multi-level concept including several different bodies and processes with different decision-making functions. In this way, governance is sometimes defined at difference to the internal management of institutions. Throughout the world, many
610:
colleges, junior and technical colleges not addressed in their previous statement. The statement is based on the same principles, believing cooperative decision-making and collective bargaining in governance should be based on "collegial" relationships. Where statements from the NEA and the AAUP advocate the importance of faculty involvement in governance, the
1059:, harmonizing institutional standards, and expanding higher education with goals related to the neoliberal market model of education. Stressing quality of learning and leadership within higher education, restructuring by way of the key catchphrases such as accountability, changing management in Europe also includes providing for human resource goals such as
926:
in the World today, being an essential basis for development inside more harmonized globalization which takes into account each person's identity and values. Therefore, our approach is that of the exchange of experience and good practices likely to be widespread within the framework of our institutions that most frequently lack real communication.
872:
implementation of expertise, the modules of training, seminars and workshops and especially specific tools of management, analysis and evaluation. It spreads his actions on the whole domain of governance (academic, administrative, financial, social, numerical and of the research) and has a function of observatory of higher education in Africa.
475:
510:). McMaster discusses the same changes in university management resulting from the "huge amount of additional administrative work at all levels within the university, and the requirement for a wide range of specialist skills in areas such as marketing, HR management, management accounting, web development and
587:, the statement believes "administration and the governing boards of colleges and universities should accept the faculty's recommendations". The statement also maintains that faculty should be involved in salary decisions, evaluating administrators, and budgeting. The policy concludes with the assertion:
1082:
illustrates the potential for innovative approaches that grant autonomy to institutions with restructuring through an external board. In conclusion, Sporn believes the new governing structures provide stronger leadership and management, but that institutions "should pay close attention to the role of
965:
governance of higher education. For a developing country that faced "massive social exclusion" for the better part of a century – only to be challenged in the 1970s and 1980s – traditional models for governance in higher education, European and North
American models of institutional autonomy are not
917:
The philosophy of this
Institute expands dialogue and shared experience between African university leaders on issues related to university governance. Methods will step out from the classical models of cooperation in which the "expertise" of the North are transmitted to "addressee" and "consignee" of
854:
of university governance, including legal obligations and legislative requirements for the internal governing boards of
Australian institutions. Accordingly, governing bodies "should make available a programme of induction and professional development . . . to ensure that all members are aware of the
550:
curricula following the establishment of democratic constitutional governance should not be replaced with retrogression to religious curricula). The AAUP published its first "Statement on
Government of Colleges and Universities" in 1920, "emphasizing the importance of faculty involvement in personnel
485:
Due to the influences of public sector reforms, several authors (Kezar and Eckel 2004; Lapworth 2004; Middlehurst 2004) point out that next to the concept of shared and participative governance a new form of governance has emerged. According to
Lapworth, the rise of the notion of corporate governance
925:
The AUF-ACU partnership consists of two joined visions. Rounding on common objectives and shared missions, Anglophones, Francophones, Lusophones and Arabic-speakers will better enrich discussions on how to develop higher educational system. This illustrates the importance taken by cultural diversity
825:
institutions, when serving the role of a board member an individual of the formal order provides guidance on the philosophy of Jesuit education while facilitating "the mutuality so essential for shared governance before the law and in reality," respecting
Catholic traditions with a democratic spirit
759:
Sponsored by the AAUP and the American Conference of Academic Deans, the 2001 Survey of Higher Education Governance is a study done by Gabriel Kaplan, a doctoral student at Harvard University interested in replicating research done by Committee T of the AAUP thirty years previously. The findings of
618:
Again, the "Policy Statement of Community College Governance" correlates based upon the same underlying principles of the AAUP and NEA statement on faculty governance. The community college statement also elaborates upon structure and procedure not addressed in the previous statement, including the
875:
At this effect, the Institute founds its methods of work on its role of observatory of higher education, on its expertise in evaluation of mechanisms of functioning and decision-making in establishments, and thus on its capacity of analysis of the modes and tools of management of higher education.
820:
By contrast to corporate trends, the author maintains that the corporate "one-size-fits-all" system could not effectively suit institutional needs. From which, the perspective then affirms the AAUP tradition of shared governance as a sound system of organization and management in higher education,
493:
University governance varies between countries. McMaster notes the different cultures in universities and the traditional relationships between faculty and administration, characterizing historical transitions and suggesting that universities today are undergoing transitions in culture. Kezar and
596:
The policy statement references the AAUP's "1966 Statement on Government of Colleges and Universities." The basic principles evidently draw from the early AAUP statement on governance. Though the NEA makes no mention of students anywhere in the policy, the NEA like the AAUP does reflect the basic
1050:
are provided as additional examples of the new managerialism in tertiary education. In both Norway and Sweden, each have emphasized restructuring based on in vogue international trends with different approaches to reform that are characterized as common to continental Europe. New organizational
871:
Based physically at the Yaounde – Cameroon, it is about a unique structure of support which aims at improving all the practices which contribute to the smooth running of higher education in Africa. Its vocation is to accompany the modernization of the governance of higher education thanks to the
990:
control of South African postsecondary institutions than what had been originally expected. From the appointments to the National Commission on Higher Education, the 1997 Higher Education Act, and the 2001 National Plan for Higher Education, the national government has assumed direct command of
921:
To assist universities in the accomplishment of their missions in an efficient and modern way, the Pan-African Institute of University Governance shall make use of the relationship it has with partners such as the Agence universitaire de la Francophonie (AUF) and the Association of Commonwealth
609:
Following on the 1987 publication of "Policy Statement on Higher Education Faculty Governance", in 1989 the NEA issued a "Policy Statement on Higher Education Policy for Community College Governance." The NEA elaborates upon issues in support of shared governance for the management of community
591:
State and federal government and external agencies should refrain from intervening in the internal governance of institutions of higher education when they are functioning in accordance with state and federal law. Government should recognize that conserving the autonomy of these institutions is
849:
The recommendations address practices by which internal governing structures operate and how they can improve institutional governance for the Commonwealth of Australia. External relations, the role of faculty and students in governance are not approached except inasmuch as institutional board
451:
role for the institution. Management structures themselves have become increasingly complex due to the increasing complexity of intraorganizational, interorganizational and governmental relationships. Whether college and university education, adult education, technical or vocational education,
929:
About governance : Two approaches shall enable us to tackle the problems of higher education institutions' governance in Africa. The first one is current. It consists of rationalizing, valorizing and modernizing both the university foundations and their various systems of functioning. It
867:
The Pan-African Institute of University Governance is a project set up by the Agence Universitaire de la Francophonie and by the Association of Commonwealth universities, in support of the Ministry of the higher education of Cameroon. It was launched during the World Conference on the Higher
1128:
economic models. Increased managerialism with economic privatization and minimizing internal governing structures are common themes in the restructuring of UK higher education, which entails the "erosion of the power of unions and professionals and the increased importance of managers and
517:
Dearlove emphasises that, under the conditions of mass higher education, no university can avoid the need for some sort of bureaucratic management and organisation, though this does not mean that the importance of informal discipline and profession-based authority (internal governance of
1006:
expressed the government's motivations to take a strong position of power in the governance of South African higher education. Whereby, the "period from the 1997 White Paper to the 2001 National Plan for Higher Education has seen a systematic tightening of state control and the
977:
by which "autonomous higher education institutions would work in a range of partnerships with government and other stakeholders," from the involvement of state supervision and consultation. Within the initial years of the democratic transition and the end of the
821:"essential to the long term interests of colleges and universities if they wish to remain competitive and academically credible". The way in which shared governance is realized in Catholic colleges and universities does vary from institution to institution. In
960:
at a time when the country has faced not only democratic transition but also the end of Apartheid racial segregation. With the South African transition to democracy in 1994, the national government and institutions of postsecondary learning envisioned the
619:"ad hoc" and standing committees as discussed in the AAUP policy statement on governance. Where the AAUP statement discusses policy on students and their academic rights, with the community college statement the NEA does not address student involvement.
1011:
of both the procedural and substantive autonomy of individual institutions". Furthermore, Hall and Symes note that while the ten universities reserved for white students during the apartheid maintained substantial autonomy, other institutions such as
1016:
and "branches of the racially defined government bureaucracy," continued to be governed by tight government intervention. The authors do not reject the need for government "steering," and cooperative governance with the national government for the
707:
governance upon which state institutional boards operate. Again, addressing the nature of external influences in university governance, the AGB defines specific principles in maintaining accountability and autonomy in the public trust, including
913:
The Institute works in partnership with stakeholders and international institutions to accompany initiatives and realize actions which can contribute to the improvement of the functioning of higher education and more widely education in Africa.
1025:
remained vague with its vision in 1996, the authors suggest that given the direction the government and NCHE have taken, there need be a rethinking of the relationship between institutions and the newly established democratic government.
955:
faces issues related to the governance of their tertiary system of higher education that correlate with international trends. Hall and Symes (2005) discuss the state of South African higher education in the first decade of the country's
614:
statement notes that many do not exercise the right when available and that faculty "at public institutions are not yet permitted to bargain collectively in many states". The NEA then elaborates upon the need for faculty participation.
370:
Governance and management of post-secondary institutions becomes even more diverse with the differences in defining the relationships between higher and tertiary education (university education), postsecondary education, technical and
362:
governance is the way in which universities are operated. Governing structures for higher education are highly differentiated throughout the world, but the different models nonetheless share a common heritage. Internationally,
918:
the South, leading to the principals and attitudes of copy-write. African Universities can only develop if they succeed in inventing their own policies and procedures, all by taking into consideration international standards.
1038:, discusses the restructuring of higher education with "notions of new public management", which the author correlates to neoliberal economic models. The author directly relates these currents in the management of European
426:
in postsecondary education predominantly refers to the internal structure, organization and management of autonomous institutions. The internal governance organization typically consists of a governing board
650:
with the formation of a "commercial consortia with other universities and private investors." Meaning, as many have begun to view education as business, they are not necessarily in the business of education.
538:(AAUP) was the first organization to formulate a statement on the governance of higher education based on principles of democratic values and participation (which, in this sense, correlates with the
1876:
667:
601:
for governance and management in more detail while touching on student involvement, the NEA statement differs by detailing primarily faculty rights and responsibilities in shared governance.
793:) private universities in the United States generally maintain remarkable autonomy from local, state, and federal government. Questions might be raised over the role of shared governance in
1034:
Institutions of tertiary higher education in Europe have been under reform, following the common goals and objectives to develop new models for institutional governance. Sporn, writing for
805:
colleges and universities adopted principles of shared governance throughout the 1960s. Moore begins by noting that the concept of shared governance is often viewed as inefficient in the
686:
The governing board should manifest a commitment to accountability and transparency and should exemplify the behavior it expects of other participants in the governance process.
868:
education of the UNESCO which was held in Paris from 5 to 8 July 2009, by the Rector of the AUF, Mr Bernard Cerquiglini, and the General Secretary of the ACU Mr John Tarrant.
1070:
structures for collaboration in external and internal governance of higher education (as done in many states within the United States). Believing that there will be either a
494:
Eckel point out the substance of governance has changed during the last decades with more emphasis put on high stake issues and more incremental decisions made in a less
855:
nature of their duties and responsibilities". The report concludes with protocol for annual reports, including report of risk management and additional steps to ensure
563:(NEA) statement on faculty governance in higher education is a straightforward point of view on their policy in support of shared governance. The policy maintains that
692:
System governing boards should clarify the authority and responsibilities of the system head, campus heads, and any institutional quasi-governing or advisory boards.
294:
740:
In conclusion, the statement asks for the reaffirmation of a commitment to citizen governance to maintain the balanced and independent governance of institutions.
479:
1835:
1002:
appointments provided the framework by which the national government could assert control over postsecondary institutions, the 2001 Education Amendment Act and
535:
695:
Boards of both public and independent colleges and universities should play an important role in relating their institutions to the communities they serve.
285:
703:, iterating many of the same points concerning recent external pressures. The statement defines the historic role and rationale behind the principles of
1158:, breaking up large institutions into smaller peripherary units with a small centralized managerial core and a split between public and private funding.
1795:
Mingle, J.R. & Epper, R.M. 1997. "State Coordination and Planning in an Age of Entrepreneurship." In Goodchild, Lovell, Hines, & Gill, (Eds.).
486:
and the decline of the shared or consensual governance can be seen to be a result of the decline in academic participation, a growing tendency towards
1909:
1100:
835:
1078:
between a strong administrative managerialism and faculty involvement in governance throughout Europe, the UK and U.S., the example of the system in
1254:
1205:
1819:
UNESCO. (2004). "Managerialism and Evaluation in Higher Education." UNESCO Forum Occasional Papers Series No. 7. Paris: Author. Available online
2038:
1707:
203:
2175:
1879:(2001). "AGB Statement on Institutional Governance" and "Governing in the Public Trust: External Influences on Colleges and Universities".
330:
1857:
2191:
680:
The board should approve a budget and establish guidelines for resource allocation using a process that reflects strategic priorities.
526:
Within the US, governance varies greatly from university to university. Without any policy, various statements have been influential.
350:(tertiary or post-secondary education) are formally organized and managed (though often there is a distinction between definitions of
1788:
Middlehurst, R. 2004. "Changing Internal Governance: A Discussion of Leadership Roles and Management Structures in UK Universities."
1939:
Dearlove, J. (1997). "The academic labour process: from collegiality and professionalism to managerialism and proletarianisation?".
254:
84:
2128:
1756:
367:
includes private not-for-profit, private for-profit, and public institutions governed by differentiated structures of management.
1775:
Leadership and Governance in Higher Education. Handbook for Decision-makers and Administrators. 2011. Raabe Academic Publishers.
259:
1853:
628:
499:
460:
416:
2201:
892:
an African challenge to realize an African community of higher education which transcends the language and political barriers
790:
560:
883:
a challenge of efficiency to develop the universities' practices of governance and make them real actors of the development.
1995:
781:
1988:
1826:
Altbach, G.P. (2005). "Patterns in Higher Education Development". In Altbach, P.G.; Berdahl, R.O.; Gumport, P.J. (eds.).
575:
and methods of instruction. Faculty is responsible for establishing degree requirements, takes primary responsibility in
2163:
1802:
Revitt, E. & Luyk, S. 2015. "Library Councils and Governance in Canadian University Libraries: A Critical Review."
1958:
1954:"South African higher education in the first decade of democracy: from cooperative governance to conditional autonomy"
1456:
302:
2016:
Lapworth, S. (2004). "Arresting Decline in Shared Governance: Towards a Flexible Model for Academic Participation".
677:
The board should establish effective ways to govern while respecting the culture of decision making in the academy.
198:
801:, Quinn and Moore (2005) support values of shared governance in Jesuit Universities. Quinn notes the way in which
514:" and the difficulties with the tensions that have resulted between collegial and corporate models of management.
411:
2196:
567:
involvement in governance is critical. Providing research support, the organization states faculty should advise
957:
666:
With recent debates and trends in the governance of institutions of higher education in the United States, the
598:
323:
279:
228:
173:
69:
1839:
1200:
946:
843:
568:
543:
59:
1105:
1779:
1770:
The Law of Higher Education: A Comprehensive Guide to Legal Implications of Administrative Decision Making
1195:
1092:
753:
249:
183:
89:
2039:"Partnerships between Administrative and Academic Managers: How Deans and Faculty Managers Work Together"
1258:
689:
Governing boards have the ultimate responsibility to appoint and assess the performance of the president.
439:
and staff, faculty senates, academic deans, department chairs, and usually some form of organization for
1190:
1042:
with the influence of U.S. models for approaching change in higher education. The European countries of
999:
584:
443:
representation. In the United States, state institution governing boards often emphasize the concept of
223:
213:
168:
995:, funding and regulation over institutions with "weak or non-existent traditions of academic freedom".
674:
The ultimate responsibility for governance of the institution (or system) rests in its governing board.
452:
educational administration presents complex challenges at all levels of private and public education.
1113:
886:
a technical challenge to help universities rationalize their means and realize in best their missions
851:
564:
547:
511:
432:
372:
153:
2045:
1137:
786:
539:
316:
158:
148:
34:
2111:
1975:
1828:
American Higher Education in the Twenty-First Century: Social, Political, and Economic Challenges
1667:
1141:
1109:
1018:
456:
364:
188:
143:
94:
2064:
1210:
1861:
1066:
Significant among these changes is the establishment of governing and coordinating boards with
2169:
1888:
1807:
1703:
1185:
1096:
1060:
1013:
794:
772:
716:
699:
With their statement on governing bodies, the AGB then provides statement on governing in the
611:
592:
essential to protecting academic freedom, the advance of knowledge, and the pursuit of truth.
376:
121:
2025:
1967:
1657:
1649:
1155:
1039:
733:
655:
464:
448:
428:
347:
193:
116:
1820:
899:
The activities of the Institute in 2009–2010 are articulate around three types of actions:
1901:
1783:
1067:
970:
856:
817:, but necessary given the organizational dynamics and complexities of university systems.
399:
218:
208:
163:
79:
2129:"Convergence of Divergence in International Higher Education Policy: Lessons from Europe"
2139:
1172:
1166:
1121:
1055:
with the diversification of higher education have emphasized maintaining institutional
503:
404:
64:
2185:
2029:
1979:
1671:
1130:
487:
889:
a strategic challenge by the pooling of tools and the exchange of the good practices
748:
987:
969:
The South African National Commission on Higher Education was meant to serve as a "
952:
700:
74:
1653:
1169:
approach to institutional change with a mix of top-down and bottom-up organization
1071:
982:, Hall and Symes (2005) note that the national government assumed a much stronger
1697:
17:
1746:
A Cultural History of Western Education; its social and intellectual foundations
1003:
962:
507:
436:
407:, a democratic shared governance model incorporating students, faculty and staff
941:
1971:
1125:
1075:
1052:
992:
983:
906:
the knowledge of the mechanisms of university governance through two inquiries
814:
580:
572:
498:
mode – the reasons for this stem from trends that have devalued the notion of
467:
governments have begun to establish coordinating and governing boards as both
423:
359:
355:
351:
42:
1953:
979:
839:
806:
768:
506:
and demands for quicker decision-making (that sometimes is achieved through
495:
384:
380:
1638:"Higher Degree Research By Numbers: Beyond the Critiques of Neo-liberalism"
2003:
Kezar, A.; Eckel, P. D. (2004). "Meeting Today's Governance Challenges".
1989:"Preliminary Results from the 2001 Survey on Higher Education Governance"
1056:
1035:
1022:
802:
388:
2096:
789:(where the former was catalyst from the later, each of which upheld the
723:
542:, which has been referred to as the "first attempt at a formally stated
468:
379:
models of education. The issues are complicated by current debates over
1662:
1079:
1008:
704:
444:
440:
2081:
1140:
in finances with stronger managerial controls and deregulation of the
809:
world. The author believes that shared governance is not a cumbersome
635:
the outsourcing of instruction, particularly to learning technologies;
1151:
1047:
1043:
974:
822:
810:
576:
1637:
1277:
1275:
1751:
Dobbins, Michael and Jens Jungblut. "Higher Education Governance."
1175:, with the merging of both public and private managerial practices.
683:
Boards should ensure open communication with campus constituencies.
2097:"NEA Policy Statements: Statement on Community College Governance"
1104:
940:
895:
a political challenge through its network of partners and experts.
767:
747:
473:
471:
and bridge to coordinate governance and institutional management.
410:
398:
644:
the buying and selling of courseware for commercial exploitation;
1457:"Statement on Board Responsibility for Institutional Governance"
879:
The Institute's action is founded around five major challenges:
627:
In 2002, the Higher Education Program and Policy Council of the
2082:"NEA Policy Statements: Faculty Governance in Higher Education"
1583:
1581:
474:
2136:
Publications from the Forum for the Future of Higher Education
2044:. Association of Tertiary Education Management. Archived from
1830:(2nd ed.). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
1776:
973:
mechanism" between government and institutions to establish a
490:
and the new environment where the universities are operating.
1292:
1290:
1877:
Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges
668:
Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges
1116:, formerly home to the university's central administration.
2112:"Shared Governance: The Elusive Role of Jesuit as Trustee"
1517:
1515:
1502:
1500:
1309:
1307:
1305:
1129:
nonexecutive, nonelected directors. In general, the new
1994:. American Association of University Professors and The
641:
re-orienting curriculum to business oriented coursework;
638:
redirecting teaching to part-time and temporary faculty;
1914:
Chancellors and AVCC statement on university governance
1124:'s system of higher education are given as examples of
931:
1840:"Statement on Government of Colleges and Universities"
1337:
1240:
1816:. Athens and London: The university of Georgia Press.
1487:
1485:
447:
governance in recognizing that board members serve a
1544:
1542:
435:(executive head, CEO) with a team of administrative
2164:
Why is Higher Education Board Governance Important?
1360:
1358:
909:
initiatives of training, information and promotion.
1390:
1388:
1375:
1373:
764:Shared governance and Jesuit Catholic universities
546:" for universities, emphasizing at that time that
744:2001 Kaplan Survey on higher education governance
712:the primacy of the board over individual members;
27:Organization of tertiary educational institutions
1858:"Shared Governance in Colleges and Universities"
1765:. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
1021:. Nonetheless, where the concept of conditional
654:Accordingly, six principles affirm standards of
2065:"In Shared Governance, What Role for the AAUP?"
1930:Coaldrake, P.; Stedman, L.; Little, P. (2003).
1281:
1814:The American College and University: A History
502:and also from the external pressures for more
480:University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore
1836:American Association of University Professors
1763:The States and Public Higher Education Policy
536:American Association of University Professors
530:American Association of University Professors
383:and shared forms of governance contrasted to
324:
8:
579:appointments and the award of promotion and
1642:Higher Education Research & Development
1932:Issues in Australian University Governance
1804:Canadian Journal of Academic Librarianship
1133:in Europe involves four different trends:
729:exhibiting exemplary public behaviour; and
331:
317:
29:
1806:, Vol 1, No. 1: 60–79. Available online:
1661:
1599:
1587:
1572:
1560:
1349:
1101:Ancient university governance in Scotland
605:Statement of community college governance
2116:Conversations on Jesuit Higher Education
2069:Conversations on Jesuit Higher Education
1925:. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
1799:, Boston, MA: Pearson Custom Publishing.
1325:
1313:
1296:
1206:Post-secondary educational organizations
998:Where the 1997 Higher Education Act and
799:Conversations on Jesuit Higher Education
2095:National Education Association (1989).
2080:National Education Association (1987).
1699:The University of Oxford: A New History
1228:
1221:
779:Since the 1819 U.S. Supreme Court case
346:is the means by which institutions for
41:
1910:Australian Vice-Chancellors' Committee
1897:
1886:
1636:Laurie, Timothy; Grealy, Liam (2017),
1491:
836:Australian Vice-Chancellors' Committee
1996:American Conference of Academic Deans
1923:On the Philosophy of Higher Education
1722:
1683:
1623:
1611:
1521:
1506:
903:the effective launch of the Institute
7:
1548:
1533:
1364:
1338:Coaldrake, Stedman & Little 2003
1241:Coaldrake, Stedman & Little 2003
1768:Kaplin, W.A. & Lee, B.A. 1995.
1757:DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199756810-0203
1476:
1442:
1430:
1418:
1406:
1394:
1379:
391:forms of institutional governance.
1797:Public Policy and Higher Education
25:
647:for profit teaching and research;
255:Sustainable Governance Indicators
2030:10.1111/j.1468-2273.2004.00275.x
1083:faculty and shared governance."
715:the importance of institutional
260:Bertelsmann Transformation Index
2005:The Journal of Higher Education
1854:American Federation of Teachers
662:Association of Governing Boards
629:American Federation of Teachers
623:American Federation of Teachers
417:Lincoln University, New Zealand
1881:The Fundamentals. Board Basics
1163:In Search For Excellence Model
791:separation of church and state
561:National Education Association
555:National Education Association
344:Governance in higher education
1:
1741:. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
1654:10.1080/07294360.2017.1288710
1255:"The Shimer College Assembly"
1253:Nelson, Adrian (2010-02-08).
932:Web site : www.ipagu.org
826:of institutional governance.
782:Dartmouth College v. Woodward
722:respecting the board as both
559:First published in 1987, the
1952:Hall, M.; Symes, A. (2005).
583:. Addressing issues through
1959:Studies in Higher Education
1883:. Washington, D.C.: Author.
1777:http://www.lg-handbook.info
1761:Heller, D.E., (Ed.). 2001.
752:Tower of Memorial Union at
478:Administrative building at
431:, board of directors), the
303:Market governance mechanism
286:Governance, risk management
2218:
2192:Educational administration
2172:Victorian TAFE Association
2063:Moore, Robert Jr. (2005).
2018:Higher Education Quarterly
1792:, Vol. 58, No. 4: 258–279.
1790:Higher Education Quarterly
1702:. Bloomsbury. p. 71.
1165:, which focuses on a more
1090:
295:Environmental, social, and
1972:10.1080/03075070500043317
1575:, pp. 200, 204, 210.
1051:forms for governance and
2170:Excellence in Governance
2110:Quinn, Kevin P. (2005).
1921:Brubacher, J.S. (1982).
1748:. New York: McGraw-Hill.
1030:Other European countries
958:constitutional democracy
599:organizational structure
280:Chief governance officer
2176:Resources on Governance
1941:Higher Education Review
1201:International education
947:University of Cape Town
838:(AVCC), the council of
544:philosophy of education
1753:Oxford Bibliographies.
1196:Educational leadership
1117:
1093:Universities in the UK
949:
776:
756:
754:University of Missouri
594:
482:
419:
408:
250:World Governance Index
2202:University governance
2037:McMaster, M. (2002).
1600:Hall & Symes 2005
1588:Hall & Symes 2005
1573:Hall & Symes 2005
1561:Hall & Symes 2005
1191:Comparative education
1108:
944:
834:In October 2003, the
771:
751:
589:
585:collective bargaining
477:
414:
402:
2166:Dr. Drumm McNaughton
1696:Evans, G.R. (2010).
1282:Kezar and Eckel 2004
1146:the Efficiency Drive
1114:University of Oxford
945:Jameson Hall at the
922:Universities (ACU).
512:instructional design
433:university president
373:vocational education
297:corporate governance
1987:Kaplan, G. (2001).
1812:Rudolph, F. 1990 .
1737:Birnbaum, R. 1991.
1590:, pp. 201–202.
1563:, pp. 205–206.
1299:, pp. 299–314.
1284:, pp. 371–398.
787:Yale Report of 1828
540:Yale Report of 1828
2127:Sporn, B. (2003).
1782:2011-03-04 at the
1755:29 November 2018.
1744:Butts, R.F. 1955.
1118:
1110:Clarendon Building
1019:developing country
950:
777:
757:
483:
420:
409:
365:tertiary education
1896:Missing or empty
1739:How Colleges Work
1709:978-0-85773-025-1
1524:, pp. 26–28.
1509:, pp. 30–31.
1479:, pp. 23–26.
1328:, pp. 56–75.
1231:, pp. 16–18.
1186:Policy governance
1097:UK enterprise law
1061:staff development
1014:technical schools
795:private education
773:Dartmouth College
612:community college
377:community college
341:
340:
18:Shared governance
16:(Redirected from
2209:
2197:Higher education
2153:
2151:
2150:
2144:
2138:. Archived from
2133:
2123:
2106:
2104:
2103:
2091:
2089:
2088:
2076:
2059:
2057:
2056:
2050:
2043:
2033:
2012:
1999:
1993:
1983:
1948:
1935:
1934:. Brisbane: QUT.
1926:
1917:
1905:
1899:
1894:
1892:
1884:
1872:
1870:
1869:
1860:. Archived from
1849:
1847:
1846:
1831:
1726:
1720:
1714:
1713:
1693:
1687:
1681:
1675:
1674:
1665:
1633:
1627:
1621:
1615:
1609:
1603:
1597:
1591:
1585:
1576:
1570:
1564:
1558:
1552:
1546:
1537:
1531:
1525:
1519:
1510:
1504:
1495:
1489:
1480:
1474:
1468:
1467:
1465:
1464:
1452:
1446:
1440:
1434:
1428:
1422:
1416:
1410:
1404:
1398:
1392:
1383:
1377:
1368:
1362:
1353:
1347:
1341:
1335:
1329:
1323:
1317:
1311:
1300:
1294:
1285:
1279:
1270:
1269:
1267:
1266:
1257:. Archived from
1250:
1244:
1238:
1232:
1226:
1161:Excellence, the
1156:Decentralization
1040:higher education
852:responsibilities
734:academic freedom
656:academic freedom
429:board of regents
403:The Assembly of
348:higher education
333:
326:
319:
179:Higher education
85:Multistakeholder
30:
21:
2217:
2216:
2212:
2211:
2210:
2208:
2207:
2206:
2182:
2181:
2160:
2148:
2146:
2142:
2131:
2126:
2109:
2101:
2099:
2094:
2086:
2084:
2079:
2062:
2054:
2052:
2048:
2041:
2036:
2015:
2002:
1991:
1986:
1951:
1938:
1929:
1920:
1908:
1895:
1885:
1875:
1867:
1865:
1852:
1844:
1842:
1834:
1825:
1784:Wayback Machine
1734:
1729:
1721:
1717:
1710:
1695:
1694:
1690:
1682:
1678:
1635:
1634:
1630:
1622:
1618:
1610:
1606:
1598:
1594:
1586:
1579:
1571:
1567:
1559:
1555:
1547:
1540:
1532:
1528:
1520:
1513:
1505:
1498:
1490:
1483:
1475:
1471:
1462:
1460:
1454:
1453:
1449:
1441:
1437:
1429:
1425:
1417:
1413:
1405:
1401:
1393:
1386:
1378:
1371:
1363:
1356:
1348:
1344:
1336:
1332:
1324:
1320:
1316:, pp. 1–9.
1312:
1303:
1295:
1288:
1280:
1273:
1264:
1262:
1252:
1251:
1247:
1239:
1235:
1227:
1223:
1219:
1211:Students' union
1182:
1120:Changes in the
1103:
1089:
1068:decision-making
1032:
939:
865:
857:good governance
832:
766:
746:
664:
625:
607:
557:
532:
524:
422:The concept of
415:The library of
397:
337:
308:
307:
299:
296:
290:
287:
275:
274:
265:
264:
245:
244:
235:
234:
233:
204:Security sector
199:Political party
138:
137:
128:
127:
126:
111:
110:
101:
100:
99:
54:
53:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
2215:
2213:
2205:
2204:
2199:
2194:
2184:
2183:
2180:
2179:
2173:
2167:
2159:
2158:External links
2156:
2155:
2154:
2124:
2107:
2092:
2077:
2060:
2034:
2024:(4): 299–314.
2013:
2000:
1984:
1966:(2): 199–212.
1949:
1936:
1927:
1918:
1906:
1873:
1850:
1832:
1823:
1817:
1810:
1800:
1793:
1786:
1773:
1766:
1759:
1749:
1742:
1733:
1730:
1728:
1727:
1715:
1708:
1688:
1676:
1648:(3): 458–471,
1628:
1616:
1604:
1602:, p. 210.
1592:
1577:
1565:
1553:
1538:
1526:
1511:
1496:
1481:
1469:
1447:
1435:
1423:
1411:
1399:
1384:
1369:
1354:
1350:Brubacher 1982
1342:
1330:
1318:
1301:
1286:
1271:
1245:
1233:
1220:
1218:
1215:
1214:
1213:
1208:
1203:
1198:
1193:
1188:
1181:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1173:Public Service
1170:
1167:human resource
1159:
1149:
1122:United Kingdom
1088:
1087:United Kingdom
1085:
1031:
1028:
938:
935:
911:
910:
907:
904:
897:
896:
893:
890:
887:
884:
864:
861:
831:
828:
765:
762:
745:
742:
738:
737:
730:
727:
720:
713:
697:
696:
693:
690:
687:
684:
681:
678:
675:
663:
660:
652:
651:
648:
645:
642:
639:
636:
624:
621:
606:
603:
571:in developing
569:administration
556:
553:
531:
528:
523:
520:
504:accountability
405:Shimer College
396:
393:
339:
338:
336:
335:
328:
321:
313:
310:
309:
306:
305:
300:
293:
291:
288:and compliance
284:
282:
276:
273:Related topics
272:
271:
270:
267:
266:
263:
262:
257:
252:
246:
242:
241:
240:
237:
236:
232:
231:
226:
221:
216:
211:
206:
201:
196:
191:
186:
181:
176:
171:
169:Ecclesiastical
166:
161:
156:
151:
146:
140:
139:
135:
134:
133:
130:
129:
125:
124:
119:
113:
112:
108:
107:
106:
103:
102:
98:
97:
92:
87:
82:
77:
72:
67:
62:
56:
55:
51:
50:
49:
46:
45:
39:
38:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2214:
2203:
2200:
2198:
2195:
2193:
2190:
2189:
2187:
2177:
2174:
2171:
2168:
2165:
2162:
2161:
2157:
2145:on 2015-01-23
2141:
2137:
2130:
2125:
2121:
2117:
2113:
2108:
2098:
2093:
2083:
2078:
2074:
2070:
2066:
2061:
2051:on 2016-03-04
2047:
2040:
2035:
2031:
2027:
2023:
2019:
2014:
2011:(4): 371–398.
2010:
2006:
2001:
1997:
1990:
1985:
1981:
1977:
1973:
1969:
1965:
1961:
1960:
1955:
1950:
1946:
1942:
1937:
1933:
1928:
1924:
1919:
1915:
1911:
1907:
1903:
1890:
1882:
1878:
1874:
1864:on 2006-10-26
1863:
1859:
1855:
1851:
1841:
1837:
1833:
1829:
1824:
1821:
1818:
1815:
1811:
1808:
1805:
1801:
1798:
1794:
1791:
1787:
1785:
1781:
1778:
1774:
1771:
1767:
1764:
1760:
1758:
1754:
1750:
1747:
1743:
1740:
1736:
1735:
1731:
1725:, p. 32.
1724:
1719:
1716:
1711:
1705:
1701:
1700:
1692:
1689:
1686:, p. 41.
1685:
1680:
1677:
1673:
1669:
1664:
1659:
1655:
1651:
1647:
1643:
1639:
1632:
1629:
1626:, p. 33.
1625:
1620:
1617:
1614:, p. 31.
1613:
1608:
1605:
1601:
1596:
1593:
1589:
1584:
1582:
1578:
1574:
1569:
1566:
1562:
1557:
1554:
1550:
1545:
1543:
1539:
1535:
1530:
1527:
1523:
1518:
1516:
1512:
1508:
1503:
1501:
1497:
1493:
1488:
1486:
1482:
1478:
1473:
1470:
1458:
1451:
1448:
1444:
1439:
1436:
1432:
1427:
1424:
1420:
1415:
1412:
1408:
1403:
1400:
1396:
1391:
1389:
1385:
1381:
1376:
1374:
1370:
1366:
1361:
1359:
1355:
1351:
1346:
1343:
1340:, p. 14.
1339:
1334:
1331:
1327:
1326:Dearlove 1997
1322:
1319:
1315:
1314:McMaster 2002
1310:
1308:
1306:
1302:
1298:
1297:Lapworth 2004
1293:
1291:
1287:
1283:
1278:
1276:
1272:
1261:on 2012-05-17
1260:
1256:
1249:
1246:
1242:
1237:
1234:
1230:
1225:
1222:
1216:
1212:
1209:
1207:
1204:
1202:
1199:
1197:
1194:
1192:
1189:
1187:
1184:
1183:
1179:
1174:
1171:
1168:
1164:
1160:
1157:
1153:
1150:
1147:
1144:market, i.e.
1143:
1139:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1132:
1131:managerialism
1127:
1123:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1102:
1098:
1094:
1086:
1084:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1069:
1064:
1062:
1058:
1054:
1049:
1045:
1041:
1037:
1029:
1027:
1024:
1020:
1015:
1010:
1005:
1001:
996:
994:
989:
985:
981:
976:
972:
967:
964:
959:
954:
948:
943:
936:
934:
933:
927:
923:
919:
915:
908:
905:
902:
901:
900:
894:
891:
888:
885:
882:
881:
880:
877:
873:
869:
862:
860:
858:
853:
847:
845:
841:
837:
829:
827:
824:
818:
816:
812:
808:
804:
800:
796:
792:
788:
784:
783:
774:
770:
763:
761:
755:
750:
743:
741:
735:
731:
728:
725:
721:
718:
714:
711:
710:
709:
706:
702:
694:
691:
688:
685:
682:
679:
676:
673:
672:
671:
669:
661:
659:
657:
649:
646:
643:
640:
637:
634:
633:
632:
630:
622:
620:
616:
613:
604:
602:
600:
593:
588:
586:
582:
578:
574:
570:
566:
562:
554:
552:
549:
548:Enlightenment
545:
541:
537:
529:
527:
522:United States
521:
519:
515:
513:
509:
505:
501:
500:participation
497:
491:
489:
488:managerialism
481:
476:
472:
470:
466:
462:
458:
453:
450:
446:
442:
438:
434:
430:
425:
418:
413:
406:
401:
394:
392:
390:
386:
382:
378:
374:
368:
366:
361:
357:
353:
349:
345:
334:
329:
327:
322:
320:
315:
314:
312:
311:
304:
301:
298:
292:
289:
283:
281:
278:
277:
269:
268:
261:
258:
256:
253:
251:
248:
247:
239:
238:
230:
229:Transnational
227:
225:
222:
220:
217:
215:
212:
210:
207:
205:
202:
200:
197:
195:
192:
190:
187:
185:
182:
180:
177:
175:
174:Environmental
172:
170:
167:
165:
162:
160:
157:
155:
152:
150:
147:
145:
142:
141:
132:
131:
123:
120:
118:
115:
114:
105:
104:
96:
93:
91:
88:
86:
83:
81:
78:
76:
73:
71:
70:Collaborative
68:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
48:
47:
44:
40:
36:
32:
31:
19:
2147:. Retrieved
2140:the original
2135:
2119:
2115:
2100:. Retrieved
2085:. Retrieved
2072:
2068:
2053:. Retrieved
2046:the original
2021:
2017:
2008:
2004:
1963:
1957:
1944:
1940:
1931:
1922:
1913:
1880:
1866:. Retrieved
1862:the original
1843:. Retrieved
1827:
1813:
1803:
1796:
1789:
1769:
1762:
1752:
1745:
1738:
1718:
1698:
1691:
1679:
1645:
1641:
1631:
1619:
1607:
1595:
1568:
1556:
1551:, p. 6.
1536:, p. 3.
1529:
1472:
1461:. Retrieved
1450:
1445:, p. 3.
1438:
1433:, p. 8.
1426:
1421:, p. 5.
1414:
1402:
1352:, p. 5.
1345:
1333:
1321:
1263:. Retrieved
1259:the original
1248:
1243:, p. 5.
1236:
1229:Altbach 2005
1224:
1162:
1145:
1119:
1065:
1033:
997:
988:bureaucratic
968:
953:South Africa
951:
937:South Africa
928:
924:
920:
916:
912:
898:
878:
874:
870:
866:
848:
844:stakeholders
833:
819:
798:
780:
778:
758:
739:
701:public trust
698:
665:
653:
626:
617:
608:
595:
590:
558:
533:
525:
516:
492:
484:
454:
421:
369:
343:
342:
178:
1947:(1): 56–75.
1663:10453/63197
1492:Kaplan 2001
1072:convergence
1004:white paper
1000:ministerial
963:cooperative
785:before the
726:and bridge;
508:bureaucracy
437:chancellors
358:). Simply,
184:Information
90:Open-source
60:Algorithmic
2186:Categories
2149:2015-01-22
2102:2006-09-26
2087:2006-09-26
2055:2015-10-22
1898:|url=
1868:2006-09-27
1845:2015-01-22
1732:References
1723:Sporn 2003
1684:Sporn 2003
1624:Sporn 2003
1612:Sporn 2003
1522:Moore 2005
1507:Quinn 2005
1463:2011-06-13
1265:2015-01-22
1152:Downsizing
1138:Efficiency
1126:neoliberal
1091:See also:
1076:divergence
1053:leadership
993:curriculum
984:regulatory
815:management
581:sabbatical
573:curriculum
424:governance
395:Governance
360:university
356:governance
352:management
224:Technology
214:Simulation
75:Electronic
43:Governance
1980:143242450
1672:151552617
1549:AVCC 2003
1534:AVCC 2003
1365:AAUP 1966
980:Apartheid
840:Australia
830:Australia
807:corporate
496:collegial
385:corporate
381:collegial
154:Corporate
1912:(2003).
1889:cite web
1856:(2002).
1838:(1966).
1780:Archived
1477:AGB 2001
1443:AGB 2001
1431:AFT 2002
1419:AFT 2002
1407:AFT 2002
1395:NEA 1989
1380:NEA 1987
1180:See also
1057:autonomy
1036:EDUCAUSE
1023:autonomy
803:Catholic
736:central.
732:keeping
717:missions
457:national
389:business
243:Measures
159:Cultural
149:Clinical
136:By field
109:By level
35:a series
33:Part of
1112:at the
1080:Austria
1009:erosion
705:citizen
565:faculty
445:citizen
441:student
189:Network
144:Climate
95:Private
2178:, AAUP
1978:
1706:
1670:
1099:, and
1048:Sweden
1044:Norway
975:system
971:buffer
863:Africa
823:Jesuit
811:system
775:, 1834
724:buffer
577:tenure
469:buffer
375:, and
122:Global
52:Models
2143:(PDF)
2132:(PDF)
2122:(10).
2049:(PDF)
2042:(PDF)
1992:(PDF)
1976:S2CID
1668:S2CID
1459:. AGB
1455:AGB.
1217:Notes
1142:labor
797:. In
465:local
461:state
449:civic
194:Ocean
117:Local
2075:(9).
1902:help
1704:ISBN
1154:and
1046:and
986:and
534:The
463:and
387:and
354:and
219:Soil
209:Self
164:Data
80:Good
2026:doi
1968:doi
1658:hdl
1650:doi
1074:or
813:of
65:Bad
2188::
2134:.
2120:28
2118:.
2114:.
2073:28
2071:.
2067:.
2022:58
2020:.
2009:75
2007:.
1974:.
1964:30
1962:.
1956:.
1945:30
1943:.
1893::
1891:}}
1887:{{
1666:,
1656:,
1646:36
1644:,
1640:,
1580:^
1541:^
1514:^
1499:^
1484:^
1387:^
1372:^
1357:^
1304:^
1289:^
1274:^
1095:,
1063:.
859:.
459:,
37:on
2152:.
2105:.
2090:.
2058:.
2032:.
2028::
1998:.
1982:.
1970::
1916:.
1904:)
1900:(
1871:.
1848:.
1822:.
1809:.
1712:.
1660::
1652::
1494:.
1466:.
1409:.
1397:.
1382:.
1367:.
1268:.
1148:.
719:;
427:(
332:e
325:t
318:v
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.