Social identity theory

780:. That is, while the relationship between independent variables and the resulting intergroup behaviour may be consistent with the theory in retrospect, that particular outcome is often not that which was predicted at the outset. A rebuttal to this charge is that the theory was never advertised as the definitive answer to understanding intergroup relationships. Instead it is stated that social identity theory must go hand in hand with sufficient understanding of the specific social context under consideration. The latter argument is consistent with the explicit importance that the authors of social identity theory placed on the role of "objective" factors, stating that in any particular situation "the effects of variables are powerfully determined by the previous social, economic, and political processes". 802:

competition and ingroup favouritism is partly attributable to the fact that early statements of the theory included empirical examples of ingroup favouritism, while alternative positive distinctiveness strategies (e.g., social creativity) were at that stage theoretical assertions. Regardless, in some circles the prediction of a straightforward identification-bias correlation has earned the pejorative title "social identity theory-lite". This raises the problem of whether social identity theory really does explain the ubiquity of ingroup favoritism in the minimal group paradigm without making recourse to "the generic norm hypothesis" originally proposed by Tajfel but later abandoned.

755:

dimensions. Social identity theorists, however, point out that for ingroup favouritism to occur a social identity "must be psychologically salient", and that negative dimensions may be experienced as a "less fitting basis for self-definition". This important qualification is subtly present in social identity theory, but is further developed in self-categorization theory. Empirical support for this perspective exist. It has been shown that when experiment participants can self-select negative dimensions that define the ingroup no positive–negative asymmetry is found.

413:"Loyalty to the group, sacrifice for it, hatred and contempt for outsiders, brotherhood within, warlikeness without,—all grow together, common products of the same situation. ... Men of an others-group are outsiders with whose ancestors the ancestors of the we-group waged war. ... Each group nourishes its own pride and vanity, boasts itself superior, exalts its own divinities, and looks with contempt on outsiders. Each group thinks its own folkways the only right ones, and if it observes that other groups have other folkways, these excite its scorn." 517:. Social identity matters because it shapes people's self-perceptions and interpersonal relationships. Favorable self-perception increases the likelihood that an individual would relate well to other members of the group and experience favorable feelings about themselves. People's perceptions of themselves are shaped by the group they identify with more strongly. Getting status within the group can make people feel more confident, content, and respected since belonging to that group becomes significant for how they view themselves and their talents. 433:' which strikes at random as the spirit moves it. No links are made or attempted, between the conditions determining its presence and mode of operation, and its outcomes in widely diffused commonalities of social behaviour. Why, when and how is social categorisation salient or not salient? What kind of shared constructions of social reality, mediated through social categorization, lead to a social climate in which large masses of people feel they are in long-term conflict with other masses? What, for example, are the 550:

strategy is an outcome of the perceived permeability of group boundaries (e.g., whether a group member may pass from a low status group into a high status group), as well as the perceived stability and legitimacy of the intergroup status hierarchy. The self-enhancing strategies detailed in social identity theory are detailed below. Importantly, although these are viewed from the perspective of a low status group member, comparable behaviours may also be adopted by high status group members.

583:. It is considered competitive in that in this case favoritism for the ingroup occurs on a value dimension that is shared by all relevant social groups (in contrast to social creativity scenarios). Social competition is predicted to occur when group boundaries are considered impermeable, and when status relations are considered to be reasonably unstable. Although not privileged in the theory, it is this positive distinctiveness strategy that has received the greatest amount of attention. 375: 653:

positive distinctiveness and describes the situations where ingroup favoritism is likely to occur (as a function of perceived group status, legitimacy, stability, and permeability). It has been shown via the minimal group studies that ingroup favoritism may occur for both arbitrary ingroups (e.g. a coin toss may split participants into a 'heads' group and a 'tails' group) as well as non-arbitrary ingroups (e.g. ingroups based on cultures,

450: 521: 708:

bet against the success of their party or team because of the diagnostic cost such a bet would incur to their identification with it. As a result, partisans and fans will reject even very favorable bets against identity-relevant desired outcomes. More than 45% of N.C.A.A. basketball and hockey fans, for example, turned down a free, real chance to earn $ 5 if their team lost its upcoming game.

323:. "Social identity theory explores the phenomenon of the 'ingroup' and 'outgroup', and is based on the view that identities are constituted through a process of difference defined in a relative or flexible way depends on the activities in which one engages." This theory is described as a theory that predicts certain intergroup behaviours on the basis of perceived group 366:, is suggested for describing the joint contributions of both social identity theory and self-categorization theory. Social identity theory suggests that an organization can change individual behaviours if it can modify their self-identity or part of their self-concept that derives from the knowledge of, and emotional attachment to the group. 476:

category memberships that apply to more than two people. The authors of social identity theory state that purely interpersonal or purely intergroup behaviour is unlikely to be found in realistic social situations. Rather, behaviour is expected to be driven by a compromise between the two extremes. The

664:

Continued study into the relationship between social categorization and ingroup favoritism has explored the relative prevalences of the ingroup favoritism vs. outgroup discrimination, explored different manifestations of ingroup favoritism, and has explored the relationship between ingroup favoritism

707:

Social identities are a valued aspect of the self, and people will sacrifice their pecuniary self-interest to maintain the self-perception that they belong to a given social group. Political partisans and fans of sports teams (e.g., Republicans and Democrats, or MLB, NFL, NCAA fans) are reluctant to

570:

Where group boundaries are considered impermeable, and where status relations are considered reasonably stable, individuals are predicted to engage in social creativity behaviours. Here, low-status ingroup members are still able to increase their positive distinctiveness without necessarily changing

763:

It has been posited that social identity theory suggests that similar groups should have an increased motivation to differentiate themselves from each other. Subsequently, empirical findings where similar groups are shown to possess increased levels of intergroup attraction and decreased levels of

745:

argue against an interpretation of positive distinctiveness as a straightforward need for self-esteem or "quasi-biological drive toward prejudice". They instead favour a somewhat more complex conception of positive self-concept as a reflection of the ideologies and social values of the perceiver.

496:

to achieve positive distinctiveness. That is, individuals "strive for a positive self-concept". As individuals to varying degrees may be defined and informed by their respective social identities (as per the interpersonal-intergroup continuum) it is further derived in social identity theory that

788:

Some researchers interpret social identity theory as drawing a direct link between identification with a social group and ingroup favoritism. This is because social identity theory was proposed as a way of explaining the ubiquity of ingroup favoritism in the minimal group paradigm. For example,

754:

In what has been dubbed the Positive-Negative Asymmetry Phenomenon, researchers have shown that punishing the out-group benefits self-esteem less than rewarding the in-group. From this finding it has been extrapolated that social identity theory is therefore unable to deal with bias on negative

549:

Building on the above components, social identity theory details a variety of strategies that may be invoked in order to achieve positive distinctiveness. The individual's choice of behaviour is posited to be dictated largely by the perceived intergroup relationship. In particular the choice of

801:

states that "although vulgarized versions of social identity theory argue that 'social identification leads automatically to discrimination and bias', in fact…discrimination and conflict are anticipated only in a limited set of circumstances". The likening of social identity theory with social

764:

in-group bias have been interpreted as problematic for the theory. Elsewhere it has been suggested that this apparent inconsistency may be resolved by attending to social identity theory's emphasis on the importance of the perceived stability and legitimacy of the intergroup status hierarchy.

740:

Some social identity theorists, including John Turner, consider the self-esteem hypothesis as not canonical to social identity theory. In fact, the self-esteem hypothesis is argued to be conflictual with the tenets of the theory. It is argued that the self-esteem hypothesis misunderstands the

652:

In-group favoritism (also known as "ingroup bias", despite Turner's objections to the term) is an effect where people give preferential treatment to others when they are perceived to be in the same ingroup. Social identity attributes the cause of ingroup favoritism to a psychological need for

475:

behaviour and intergroup behaviour. Completely interpersonal behaviour would be behaviour determined solely by the individual characteristics and interpersonal relationships that exists between only two people. Completely intergroup behaviour would be behaviour determined solely by the social

698:

Social identification can lead individuals to engage in prosocial behaviours towards others. Examples include contexts such as food drives or even shared purchasing patterns, as might occur for motorcycle riders. Interestingly, consumers may have sub-identities that are nested into a larger

733:. In what has become known as the "self-esteem hypothesis", self-esteem is predicted to relate to in-group bias in two ways. Firstly, successful intergroup discrimination elevates self-esteem. Secondly, depressed or threatened self-esteem promotes intergroup discrimination. 571:

the objective resources of the ingroup or the outgroup. This may be achieved by comparing the ingroup to the outgroup on some new dimension, changing the values assigned to the attributes of the group, and choosing an alternative outgroup by which to compare the ingroup.

746:

Additionally, it is argued that the self-esteem hypothesis neglects the alternative strategies to maintaining a positive self-concept that are articulated in social identity theory (i.e., individual mobility and social creativity).

331:

and stability of those status differences, and the perceived ability to move from one group to another. This contrasts with occasions where the term "social identity theory" is used to refer to general theorizing about human

2667:

McGarty, C (2001). "Social Identity Theory does not maintain that identification produces bias, and self-categorization Theory does not maintain that salience is identification: Two comments on Mummendey, Klink and Brown".

599:. This theory holds that political elites are individually rational, and they use identity instrumentally to cultivate minimum winning constituencies (e.g., via the "microtargeting" of ads). An example of microtargeting is 2887: 699:

identity. As a result, "hen consumers identify with the overall community, they assist other consumers. However, consumers are less likely to help consumers in the overall community when identifying with a subgroup".

453:

Henri Tajfel suggests that soldiers of opposing armies, fighting outside of view, is an illustrative example of behaviour at the extreme intergroup end of the intergroup-interpersonal continuum (shown: U.S. Marines in

2633:

Stangor, C.; Jost, J. T. (1997). Spears, R.; Oakes, P. J.; Ellemers, N; et al. (eds.). "Commentary: Individual, group and system levels of analysis and their relevance for stereotyping and intergroup relations".

2498:

1669:

Haslam, S. A.; Ellemers, N.; Reicher, S. D.; Reynolds, K. J.; Schmitt, M. T. (2010). Postmes, T.; Branscombe, N. R. (eds.). "The social identity perspective tomorrow: Opportunities and avenues for advance".

1118:

Haslam, S. A.; Ellemers, N.; Reicher, S. D.; Reynolds, K. J.; Schmitt, M. T. (2010). Postmes, T.; Branscombe, N. R. (eds.). "The social identity perspective today: An overview of its defining ideas".

672:

System justification theory was originally proposed by John Jost and Mahzarin Banaji in 1994 to build on social identity theory and to understand important deviations from ingroup favoritism, such as

2347:

Reynolds, K. J.; Turner, J. C.; Haslam, S. A.; Ryan, M. K. (2000). "When are we better than them and they worse than us? A closer look at social discrimination in positive and negative domains".

797:

state that "a main premise of social identity theory is that ingroup members will favour their own group over other groups". This interpretation is rejected by other researchers. For example,

2933: 1941:

Krumm, Angela J.; Corning, Alexandra F. (1 December 2008). "Who Believes Us When We Try to Conceal Our Prejudices? The Effectiveness of Moral Credentials With In-Groups Versus Out-Groups".

536:), culture, traditions, and music was provided by Tajfel and colleagues as an example of the cognitive creativity of low-status groups in the face of stable intergroup relations (shown: 1654:

Ouwerkerk, J. W.; Ellemers, N.; de Gilder, D. (1999). Ellemers, N.; Spears, R.; Doosje, B. (eds.). "Group commitment and individual effort in experimental and organizational contexts".

600: 2337:

Turner, J. C. & Reynolds, K. J. (2010). The story of social identity. In T. Postmes & N. Branscombe (Eds). Rediscovering Social Identity: Core Sources. Psychology Press. p. 142

401:

The term 'social identity theory' achieved academic currency only in the late 1970s, but the basic underlying concepts associated with it had emerged by the early twentieth century.

2437:

Tajfel, H. (1984). "Intergroup relations, social myths and social justice in social psychology". In Tajfel, H. (ed.). Vol. 2. Cambridge: University Press. pp. 695–715.

480:

nature of personal vs. social identities, and the relationship between them, is more fully developed in self-categorization theory. Social identity theory instead focuses on the

1406:

Turner, J. C.; Reynolds, K. H. (2001). "The Social Identity Perspective in Intergroup Relations: Theories, Themes, and Controversies". In Brown, S. L.; Gaertner (eds.).

1477:

Long, K.; Spears, R. (1997). Spears, R.; Oakes, P. J.; Ellemers, N; et al. (eds.). "The self-esteem hypothesis revisited: Differentiation and the disaffected".

562:

strategies. That is, individuals "disassociate from the group and pursue individual goals designed to improve their personal lot rather than that of their ingroup".

505:. In particular, it was found that under certain conditions individuals would endorse resource distributions that would maximize the positive distinctiveness of an 497:"individuals strive to achieve or to maintain positive social identity". The precise nature of this striving for positive self-concept is a matter of debate (see 1197:

Ashmore, R. D.; Deaux, K.; McLaughlin-Volpe, T. (2004). "An organizing framework for collective identity: Articulation and significance of multidimensionality".

1827:

Ellemers, N.; Barreto, M. (2001). "The impact of relative group status: affective, perceptual and behavioural consequences". In Brown, S. L.; Gaertner (eds.).

682:

was also inspired by social identity theory and developed by Branscombe and colleagues in 1999 as a mechanism to understand and explain the different types of

425:. Over fifty years later, around the time of the first formal use of the term 'social identity theory', Tajfel wrote this on the state of social psychology: 2808: 1065:

Turner, J. C. (1999). Ellemers, N.; Spears, R.; Doosje, B. (eds.). "Some current issues in research on social identity and self-categorization theories".

2600:

Brewer, M. B.; Gaertner, S. L. (2001). "Toward reduction of prejudice: intergroup contact and social categorization". In Brown, S. L.; Gaertner (eds.).

2703:

Rubin, M.; Hewstone, M. (2004). "Social identity, system justification, and social dominance: Commentary on Reicher, Jost et al., and Sidanius et al".

441:

Thus, social identity theory in part reflects a desire to reestablish a more collectivist approach to social psychology of the self and social groups.

484:

factors that will predict which end of the spectrum will most influence an individual's behaviour, along with the forms that the behaviour may take.

2164:

Morewedge, Carey K.; Tang, Simone; Larrick, Richard P. (2016-10-12). "Betting Your Favorite to Win: Costly Reluctance to Hedge Desired Outcomes".

340:. It was awareness of the limited scope of social identity theory that led John Turner and colleagues to develop a cousin theory in the form of 721:

Social identity theory proposes that people are motivated to achieve and maintain positive concepts of themselves. Some researchers, including

280: 1984:

Giannakakis, Andrew Erik; Fritsche, Immo (1 January 2011). "Social Identities, Group Norms, and Threat: On the Malleability of Ingroup Bias".

501:). Both the interpersonal-intergroup continuum and the assumption of positive distinctiveness motivation arose as outcomes of the findings of 336:. Moreover, and although some researchers have treated it as such, social identity theory was never intended to be a general theory of social 2649:

Spears, R.; Doosje, B.; Ellemers, N. (1999). Ellemers, N.; Spears, R.; Doosje, B. (eds.). "Commitment and the context of social perception".

1696: 1456: 1091: 936: 579:

Here an ingroup seeks positive distinctiveness and requires positive differentiation via direct competition with the outgroup in the form of

2514:

Smith, E.R.; Smith, E. R. (1999). "Reconceptualizing social identity: a new framework and evidence for the impact of different dimensions".

897:"The significance of the social identity concept for social psychology with reference to individualism, interactionism and social influence" 1721: 3332: 2928: 467:

Social identity theory states that social behaviour will want a person to change their behaviour while in a group. It varies along a

386: 2764: 2617: 2584: 2450: 2406: 2252:

Rubin, M.; Hewstone, M. (1998). "Social identity theory's self-esteem hypothesis: A review and some suggestions for clarification".

1844: 1423: 558:

It is predicted that under conditions where the group boundaries are considered permeable individuals are more likely to engage in

2237: 2220: 3119: 3041: 2549:

Operanio, D.; Fiske, S. T. (2001). "Stereotypes: Content, Structures, Processes and Context". In Brown, R.; Geartner, S. (eds.).

2091:

Shipley (2008). "Social Comparison and prosocial behavior: An applied study of social identity theory in community food drives".

3385: 3069: 2971: 2801: 1860:

Brewer, Marilynn B. (1 January 1979). "Ingroup bias in the minimal intergroup situations: A cognitive motivational analysis".

418: 1029:

Tajfel, H.; Turner, J. C. (1986). "The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour". In S. Worchel; W. G. Austin (eds.).

2910: 2752: 2323:

Bourhis, R. Y.; Gagnon, A. (2001). "Social Orientations in the Minimal Group Paradigm". In Brown, S. L.; Gaertner (eds.).

3390: 2981: 2895: 2840: 1531:

Turner, J. C. (1978). H, Tajfel (ed.). "Social categorization and social discrimination in the minimal group paradigm".

3124: 3006: 2199:

Hogg, M. A.; Abrams, D. (1990). Abrams, D.; Hogg, M. A (eds.). "Social motivation, self-esteem, and social identity".

1014:

Tajfel, H.; Turner, J. C. (1979). "An integrative theory of intergroup conflict". In W. G. Austin; S. Worchel (eds.).

58: 3211: 3064: 2900: 2883: 2794: 2137:

Johnson; Massiah; Allen (2013). "Community identification increases consumer-to-consumer helping, but not always".

822: 472: 341: 312: 273: 94: 1887:

Hogg, M.A.; Turner, J.C. (1987). "Intergroup behaviour, self-stereotyping and the salience of social categories".

1302:

Hogg, Michael A.; Williams, Kipling D. (1 January 2000). "From I to we: Social identity and the collective self".

3347: 3271: 3084: 3021: 3011: 2920: 2567:; Trafimow, D. (2001). "Culture and its implications for intergroup behavior". In Brown, S. L.; Gaertner (eds.). 209: 1494:"Low status groups show in-group favoritism to compensate for their low status and to compete for higher status" 1270:

Postmes, T. & Branscombe, N. (2010). "Sources of social identity". In T. Postmes & N. Branscombe (Eds).

3296: 3281: 666: 596: 356: 146: 3241: 3231: 3026: 972:

Turner, J. C.; Reynolds, K. J. (2010). "The story of social identity". In T. Postmes; N. Branscombe (eds.).

951:

The thoughts and feelings that arise when you think about the group you belong to form your social identity.

468: 249: 3395: 3276: 3114: 2996: 2991: 2976: 2966: 2878: 837: 679: 510: 506: 502: 328: 229: 224: 110: 3216: 3160: 3094: 2905: 379: 266: 2308:

Turner, J. C.; Oakes, P. J. (1997). McGarty, C.; Haslam, S. A. (eds.). "The socially structured mind".

1166:"Choice of comparisons in intergroup settings: the role of temporal information and comparison motives" 3322: 3261: 3170: 3059: 2961: 1768: 827: 790: 622: 430: 89: 3291: 3286: 3134: 3079: 3036: 3016: 687: 673: 647: 614: 610: 333: 214: 1722:"Congress just published all the Russian Facebook ads used to try and influence the 2016 election" 741:

distinction between a social identity and a personal identity. Along those lines, John Turner and

374: 3256: 3251: 3246: 3236: 3226: 3089: 2956: 2531: 2460: 2287: 2116: 2009: 1966: 1758: 1578: 1513: 1222: 1097: 862: 857: 742: 658: 345: 254: 125: 2044:"Social identity shapes social valuation: evidence from prosocial behavior and vicarious reward" 1533:

Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations

1285:

Folkways: A Study of the Sociological Importance of Usages, Manners, Customs, Mores, and Morals

407:

Folkways: A Study of the Sociological Importance of Usages, Manners, Customs, Mores, and Morals

3364: 3221: 3155: 3129: 3099: 2951: 2860: 2760: 2685: 2613: 2580: 2564: 2446: 2402: 2364: 2279: 2181: 2108: 2073: 2001: 1958: 1840: 1802: 1784: 1702: 1692: 1452: 1448: 1419: 1214: 1087: 942: 932: 832: 773: 618: 603:

alleged to have influenced the United States 2016 presidential election. Separately, a recent

592: 529: 525: 422: 402: 344:, which built on the insights of social identity theory to produce a more general account of 245: 204: 3352: 3306: 3301: 2835: 2720: 2712: 2677: 2605: 2572: 2523: 2438: 2394: 2356: 2269: 2261: 2232: 2173: 2146: 2100: 2063: 2055: 1993: 1950: 1923: 1896: 1869: 1832: 1792: 1776: 1636: 1570: 1505: 1440: 1411: 1338: 1311: 1206: 1177: 1146: 908: 777: 605: 481: 188: 405:, writing in 1906, captures the primary dynamics in this excerpt from his influential work 3342: 3195: 3185: 3180: 3165: 2484: 2472: 654: 559: 449: 183: 162: 120: 2385:

Brown, R. J. (1984). Tajfel, H. (ed.). "The role of similarity in intergroup relations".

1772: 1548:

Differentiation Between Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations

1361:

Differentiation Between Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations

3359: 3190: 3150: 2986: 2845: 2817: 2068: 2043: 1900: 1797: 1746: 1342: 1150: 1135:"What Have They Done for Us Lately? The Dynamics of Reciprocity in Intergroup Contexts" 913: 896: 867: 726: 630: 349: 337: 320: 115: 676:

on the part of members of disadvantaged groups (Jost & Banaji, 1994; Jost, 2020).

17: 3379: 3327: 3175: 3074: 2850: 2716: 2535: 1582: 1517: 1441: 1134: 872: 812: 626: 514: 324: 167: 36: 2291: 2120: 2013: 1970: 1914:

Ahmed, Ali M. (1 June 2007). "Group identity, social distance and intergroup bias".

1688:

Tyranny of the minority : the subconstituency politics theory of representation

1226: 437:

transitions from a stable to an unstable social system?" (Original emphasis, p. 188)

3337: 3109: 2821: 2786: 2739:

Haslam, A. S. (2001). Psychology in Organizations. London, SAGE Publications. p. 40

2221:"Social Identity Theory: past achievements, current problems and future challenges" 1613:

Haslam, A. S. (2001). Psychology in Organizations. London, SAGE Publications. p. 38

1101: 1081: 722: 390: 308: 301: 294: 68: 520: 2442: 2398: 1546:

Tajfel, H. (1978). Tajfel, H. (ed.). "The achievement of group differentiation".

1359:

Tajfel, H. (1978). Tajfel, H. (ed.). "Interindividual and intergroup behaviour".

929:

Social Psychology in Action: Evidence-Based Interventions from Theory to Practice

729:, thus propose a fairly direct relationship between positive social identity and 492:

A key assumption in social identity theory is that individuals are intrinsically

2527: 2265: 1258: 798: 730: 537: 141: 73: 2609: 2576: 1954: 1927: 1873: 1836: 1624: 1574: 1210: 3266: 3104: 3031: 2360: 2150: 2104: 1415: 946: 493: 63: 2185: 1997: 1788: 1706: 1509: 1315: 2780: 2681: 1640: 847: 842: 817: 794: 734: 477: 298: 2689: 2368: 2283: 2177: 2112: 2077: 2005: 1962: 1806: 1780: 1218: 429:"Thus, social categorization is still conceived as a haphazardly floating ' 2274: 2059: 1686: 385: 2725: 852: 455: 319:

introduced the concept of a social identity as a way in which to explain

2238:

10.1002/1099-0992(200011/12)30:6<745::AID-EJSP24>3.0.CO;2-O

1745:

Stewart, Alexander J.; McCarty, Nolan; Bryson, Joanna J. (2020-12-11).

1261:(2001). Psychology in Organizations. London, SAGE Publications. p 26-57 1439:

Haslam, S. Alexander; Reicher, Stephen D.; Platow, Michael J. (2011).

2855: 1182: 1165: 683: 1623:

Tajfel, Henri; Billig, M. G.; Bundy, R. P.; Flament, Claude (1971).

1763: 1329:

Tajfel, H. (1979). "Individuals and groups in social psychology".

772:

Social identity theory has been criticised for having far greater

519: 448: 384: 373: 2027:

Branscombe, N.R.; Ellemers, N.; Spears, R.; Doosje, E.J. (1999).

1822: 1820: 1818: 1816: 1254: 1252: 1250: 1248: 1246: 1244: 1242: 1240: 1238: 1236: 533: 44: 2790: 1443:

The new psychology of leadership: Identity, influence and power

1401: 1399: 1397: 1395: 1393: 1391: 1389: 1387: 1385: 967: 965: 963: 961: 959: 1561:

Tajfel, H. (1974). "Social identity and intergroup behavior".

1009: 1007: 1005: 1003: 2602: