84:
74:
53:
271:
1252:. Moving on, if you are the nominator, it assumes you take upon yourself to fix the works by others. So youll have to address all issues, including those introduced by others. Regarding Wikicup, ask the judges. It also depends on whether this so-far still succesful nom is failed, and re-reviewed. I wouldn't worry about Wikicup, there are months left in the 1st round, and last time, a single DYK was enough to move to the second round anyway. --
883:
860:
846:
815:
791:
764:
754:
729:
715:
701:
670:
636:
183:
162:
193:
22:
502:
1052:, there is a typo in "Bank Kassowy", the use of capital letters seems problematic (I am pretty sure MOS discoruages them), there is inconsistent use of Polish diacritics ("dziesięć" vs "DZIESIEC"). Fair use images probably need additional rationale. I am sorry, Czarkoff, but if this is how you review articles, I am afraid I have to take this to
419:... the article says "In 1950, new notes, which were dated 1948, were introduced for 2, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 and 500 złotych, but 1000 złotych notes were added in 1962. 200 and 2000 złotych notes were added in 1976 and 1977, followed by 5000 złotych notes in 1982" and it has a picture of the ten zloty note with
1298:
The other thing that needs to be corrected is the issue date for the "2, 5, 10, 20" notes in the "Third złoty banknotes" section. The 50, 100, and 500 probably were in fact issued in 1948 - I don't know off the top of my head, but I'm dead sure that the 10 and 20 came out in early 80's because I
1031:
You are right, kiwix fork is a red flag, and this has been raised on talk few days ago, and ignored by the nominator and the reviewer. On a quick glance, lead is poorly formatted (seems too short, and too many paragraphs), there are problem with
1013:
Ok, I already stated this above but let me repeat. In additional to some other problems (about which I emailed Plarem and got no response so far), the article uses
Knowledge as a source and contains some inaccuracies. It's not up to GA
1435:
For as long as the title of the article is "10 złotych note", the content should use the same style (perhaps with a footnote explaining the Polish declension?). Conversely, I see no problem with you creating redirect articles
1351:
Failed, due to issues raised in the GA review which ended in total removal of several sections (design, security). Without them, the article cannot even claim to be roughly comprehensive. --
1299:
remember it. This is the section which is using kiwix/wikipedia as a source and it is incorrect. In fact, it's a pretty good example of why
Knowledge shouldn't be used as a source.
282:
1317:
Actually with the ten zloty note, I think it got introduced in 1950, retired in 1960 (replaced by a coin with
Mickiewicz on it) and then a new one was issued in 1982 or so.
507:
1272:
I also noticed that this must be a rushed review, as after most of my reviews, I get a bowl of strawberries, or a barnstar for my good work. Now I got nothing. :( –
540:
1432:
Given that you made the change while the discussion at talk:Złoty was ongoing and clearly controversial, I'm afraid I have difficulty understanding your logic.
530:
144:
1475:
134:
423:
on it (that should be added and linked). But I'm pretty sure the Bem note was issued in the 1980's (probably 1982), not in 1950 as the article suggests.
378:
368:
1056:
and ask for a re-review of all of them. PS. This was a quick review, prose was not reviewed, and only few sample paras were checked for style issues. --
1480:
1490:
239:
249:
1289:. It's basically a common error and many people are not aware of the fact that stuff from other languages needs to be translated AND paraphrased.
512:
110:
1332:
It's been two days and the copyvio issues have not been addressed. I've removed the offending section. The article should be delisted from GA.
1505:
1495:
1470:
1161:
922:
Sorry, just noticed that in the article's body You spell the captions from the notes in ALL CAPS, while on the notes they are spelled in
1091:"You are right, kiwix fork is a red flag, and this has been raised on talk few days ago, and ignored by the nominator and the reviewer."
1085:
I have to agree with all the points listed above. But I do not take full responsibility for all of them. I take full responsibility for:
405:
297:
604:
292:
215:
97:
58:
1485:
838:
1500:
1449:
1405:
1382:
as "zloty" and create an unnatural plural "zlotys". I disagree, just as I would if we still had
Italian Lire (not Liras!). The
610:
535:
288:
1292:
Specifically here, the "Design" section is a verbatim translation of the source (even the same phrases are left in all caps)
721:
579:
471:
Well, you nominated it for GA. I actually tried to find something about it but wasn't going to spend that much time on it.
206:
167:
33:
558:
334:
1445:
1401:
1111:
Those are my first non-free pictures uploaded to
Knowledge, I was not fully sure how to write a fair-use rationale.
270:
642:
448:
434:
1423:
1155:
900:
The only (minor) issue I see with this article is the
Infobox: it shouldn't have blanks. Either fill in the
687:
662:
1293:
287:, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the
554:
1383:
39:
1093:
I have added the kiwix ref because I could find nothing else, will be removed in a short space of time.
1441:
1397:
1333:
1318:
1302:
1015:
472:
444:
430:
394:
356:
1437:
21:
1419:
1373:
1151:
214:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
109:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1002:
986:
975:
931:
913:
573:
89:
1219:(English): The problem is that an excellent translation of copyrighted text is also copyrighted.
967:
I'm busy fixing the
Infobox. At least it hides the unused strings now. As far as I can see, the
73:
52:
1357:
1283:
1258:
1224:
1186:
1062:
828:
650:
401:
1393:
1097:"On a quick glance, lead is poorly formatted (seems too short, and too many paragraphs)"
371:
linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
1189:
points. Do I get them now, or, if it is reassessed, after the second assessment (/GA2)?
777:
646:
614:
458:
364:
1115:"the use of capital letters seems problematic (I am pretty sure MOS discoruages them)"
1464:
1416:
1129:
1053:
1033:
998:
982:
927:
909:
852:
658:
654:
569:
360:
198:
367:
when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an
1353:
1254:
1058:
707:
1400:
to try to sneak the equivalent change through on related articles. Please stop.
1137:
1041:
102:
1453:
1427:
1409:
1363:
1341:
1326:
1310:
1276:
1264:
1236:
1068:
1023:
1006:
990:
961:
935:
917:
583:
480:
465:
452:
438:
409:
1287:
188:
182:
161:
106:
79:
1214:"Problem w tym ze doslowne tlumaczenie copyrighted text jest tez copyrighted"
1103:"there is inconsistent use of Polish diacritics ("dziesięć" vs "DZIESIEC")."
908:
fields or remove the pipe symbols (|) from the code. Otherwise good work! —
427:
420:
1286:, which is a problem with that page - I brought the issue up recently here
1185:
Feel free to re-review this article. The only question I have is about the
561:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
457:
But, instead of obliging another editor into doing it, you could have been
1145:
1049:
211:
363:, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the
1141:
1133:
1045:
1037:
1282:
You're right that there's no mention of verbatim translations in
1415:
The
National Bank of Poland uses "zlotys" on its English website
384:
That this article is linked to from the image description page.
15:
1227:, there is not a word about translated work. Please explain.
381:
on the image's description page for the use in this article.
291:. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be
1122:
But, on the other hand I do not take responsibility for:
1250:
947:
327:
997:
I atually fixed Infobox, now it hides empty fields. —
1109:"Fair use images probably need additional rationale."
946:
If I remove the pipes, then the infobox is ruined. (
301:
of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
210:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
942:The first point has its own issues, unfortunately.
1105:; That was just not noticed, therefore not fixed.
443:In fact, it's just an older version of Knowledge.
971:are only used in the name of the bank. Template
1208:Volunteer Marek, in your email to me, you say:
404:. For assistance on the image use policy, see
1394:Polish złoty#Requested move 10 September 2022
461:and fixed it, but with civility of course. –
390:The following images also have this problem:
8:
1387:
1377:
837:(images are tagged and non-free images have
351:Image copyright problem with File:10zl a.jpg
490:
426:More generally, I'm not so sure that this
306:
265:
156:
47:
1418:, thus I did not think it controversial.
359:is used in this article under a claim of
283:Social sciences and society good articles
521:
493:
158:
49:
19:
1295:and needs to be rewritten/paraphrased.
594:This section is supposed to be edited
1354:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
1255:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
1059:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
7:
1148:, there is a typo in "Bank Kassowy""
1029:Where is Knowledge used as a source?
204:This article is within the scope of
95:This article is within the scope of
406:Knowledge:Media copyright questions
38:It is of interest to the following
1476:Mid-importance numismatic articles
957:I am onto the the second point. –
926:. I think that should be fixed. —
832:, where possible and appropriate.
14:
119:Knowledge:WikiProject Numismatics
1481:WikiProject Numismatics articles
948:For a demonstration, click here.
881:
858:
844:
813:
789:
786:Fair representation without bias
762:
752:
727:
713:
699:
668:
634:
269:
191:
181:
160:
122:Template:WikiProject Numismatics
82:
72:
51:
20:
1491:High-importance Poland articles
1369:Changing złotych to zlotys: BRD
981:should help with this issue. —
953:Can I just write in 'Unknown.'?
613:for what the criteria are, and
400:This is an automated notice by
244:This article has been rated as
139:This article has been rated as
1454:11:48, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
1428:03:37, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
1410:19:52, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
1376:believes that we should spell
1099:; I am not a good lead writer.
1:
218:and see a list of open tasks.
113:and see a list of open tasks.
1506:Former good article nominees
1364:22:54, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
1347:B-class review for WP:POLAND
1144:is incorrectly redlinked to
1048:is incorrectly redlinked to
882:
859:
845:
814:
790:
763:
753:
728:
714:
700:
669:
635:
365:requirements for such images
224:Knowledge:WikiProject Poland
1496:WikiProject Poland articles
1471:C-Class numismatic articles
1342:18:16, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
1327:18:45, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
1311:18:40, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
1277:18:17, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
1265:19:43, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
1237:18:13, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
1069:17:17, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
1024:17:07, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
1007:22:09, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
991:21:32, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
962:19:57, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
936:12:54, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
918:12:45, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
584:12:45, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
481:18:51, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
466:18:29, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
453:19:40, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
439:19:40, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
410:00:27, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
227:Template:WikiProject Poland
1522:
940:Hello Dmitrij D. Czarkoff!
295:. Editors may also seek a
250:project's importance scale
145:project's importance scale
1136:is never ilinked, nor is
1040:is never ilinked, nor is
309:
305:
243:
176:
138:
67:
46:
1128:"there are problem with
559:Talk:10 złotych note/GA1
1486:C-Class Poland articles
624:reasonably well written
98:WikiProject Numismatics
1501:Delisted good articles
1388:
1378:
851:(appropriate use with
617:for what they are not)
379:non-free use rationale
28:This article is rated
1446:John Maynard Friedman
1402:John Maynard Friedman
826:It is illustrated by
778:neutral point of view
742:broad in its coverage
429:is a reliable source.
289:good article criteria
335:Good article nominee
1396:is resolved, it is
1392:. Until the RtM at
1132:(for example, word
1036:(for example, word
999:Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
983:Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
928:Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
910:Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
839:fair use rationales
125:numismatic articles
810:No edit wars, etc.
683:factually accurate
310:Article milestones
207:WikiProject Poland
90:Numismatics portal
34:content assessment
1249:Regarding kiwix,
853:suitable captions
549:
548:
348:
347:
344:
343:
264:
263:
260:
259:
256:
255:
155:
154:
151:
150:
1513:
1391:
1381:
1360:
1339:
1336:
1324:
1321:
1308:
1305:
1275:
1261:
1235:
1065:
1021:
1018:
980:
974:
970:
960:
925:
885:
884:
862:
861:
848:
847:
817:
816:
793:
792:
766:
765:
756:
755:
731:
730:
717:
716:
708:reliable sources
703:
702:
672:
671:
638:
637:
503:Copyvio detector
491:
478:
475:
464:
377:That there is a
330:
307:
273:
266:
232:
231:
228:
225:
222:
201:
196:
195:
194:
185:
178:
177:
172:
164:
157:
127:
126:
123:
120:
117:
92:
87:
86:
85:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
1521:
1520:
1516:
1515:
1514:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1461:
1460:
1442:ten zlotys note
1371:
1362:
1358:
1349:
1337:
1334:
1322:
1319:
1306:
1303:
1273:
1263:
1259:
1233:
1067:
1063:
1019:
1016:
978:
972:
968:
958:
923:
898:
775:It follows the
749:(major aspects)
598:by reviewer(s).
591:
553:This review is
545:
517:
489:
476:
473:
462:
445:Volunteer Marek
431:Volunteer Marek
417:
395:File:10zl r.jpg
357:File:10zl a.jpg
353:
328:January 6, 2012
326:
279:was one of the
277:10 złotych note
246:High-importance
230:Poland articles
229:
226:
223:
220:
219:
197:
192:
190:
171:High‑importance
170:
124:
121:
118:
115:
114:
88:
83:
81:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
1519:
1517:
1509:
1508:
1503:
1498:
1493:
1488:
1483:
1478:
1473:
1463:
1462:
1459:
1458:
1457:
1456:
1438:10 zlotys note
1433:
1420:TheCurrencyGuy
1384:wp:common name
1374:TheCurrencyGuy
1370:
1367:
1352:
1348:
1345:
1330:
1329:
1314:
1313:
1300:
1296:
1290:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1253:
1244:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1216:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1195:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1174:
1173:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1152:MathewTownsend
1124:
1123:
1119:
1118:
1112:
1106:
1100:
1094:
1087:
1086:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1057:
1010:
1009:
994:
993:
955:
954:
951:
941:
897:
894:
893:
892:
891:
890:
889:
888:
869:
868:
867:
866:
865:
824:
823:
822:
821:
820:
800:
799:
798:
797:
796:
773:
772:
771:
770:
769:
738:
737:
736:
735:
734:
706:(citations to
679:
678:
677:
676:
675:
619:
618:
590:
587:
564:
563:
547:
546:
544:
543:
538:
533:
527:
524:
523:
519:
518:
516:
515:
513:External links
510:
505:
499:
496:
495:
488:
485:
484:
483:
416:
413:
398:
397:
388:
387:
386:
385:
382:
352:
349:
346:
345:
342:
341:
338:
331:
323:
322:
319:
316:
312:
311:
303:
302:
274:
262:
261:
258:
257:
254:
253:
242:
236:
235:
233:
216:the discussion
203:
202:
186:
174:
173:
165:
153:
152:
149:
148:
141:Mid-importance
137:
131:
130:
128:
111:the discussion
94:
93:
77:
65:
64:
62:Mid‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1518:
1507:
1504:
1502:
1499:
1497:
1494:
1492:
1489:
1487:
1484:
1482:
1479:
1477:
1474:
1472:
1469:
1468:
1466:
1455:
1451:
1447:
1443:
1439:
1434:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1425:
1421:
1417:
1414:
1413:
1412:
1411:
1407:
1403:
1399:
1398:wp:disruptive
1395:
1390:
1385:
1380:
1375:
1368:
1366:
1365:
1361:
1355:
1346:
1344:
1343:
1340:
1328:
1325:
1316:
1315:
1312:
1309:
1301:
1297:
1294:
1291:
1288:
1285:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1266:
1262:
1256:
1251:
1248:
1247:
1246:
1245:
1238:
1231:
1226:
1222:
1221:
1220:
1217:
1215:
1212:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1188:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1163:
1160:
1157:
1153:
1149:
1147:
1143:
1139:
1135:
1131:
1126:
1125:
1121:
1120:
1116:
1113:
1110:
1107:
1104:
1101:
1098:
1095:
1092:
1089:
1088:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1070:
1066:
1060:
1055:
1051:
1047:
1043:
1039:
1035:
1030:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1022:
1012:
1011:
1008:
1004:
1000:
996:
995:
992:
988:
984:
977:
966:
965:
964:
963:
952:
949:
945:
944:
943:
938:
937:
933:
929:
920:
919:
915:
911:
907:
903:
895:
887:
886:
879:
876:
875:
873:
870:
864:
863:
856:
854:
842:
840:
834:
833:
831:
830:
825:
819:
818:
811:
808:
807:
805:
801:
795:
794:
787:
784:
783:
781:
779:
774:
768:
767:
760:
750:
746:
745:
743:
739:
733:
732:
725:
723:
711:
709:
697:
693:
692:
690:
689:
684:
680:
674:
673:
666:
664:
660:
656:
652:
648:
644:
632:
628:
627:
625:
621:
620:
616:
612:
608:
606:
602:
601:
600:
599:
597:
588:
586:
585:
581:
578:
575:
571:
568:
562:
560:
556:
551:
550:
542:
539:
537:
534:
532:
529:
528:
526:
525:
520:
514:
511:
509:
506:
504:
501:
500:
498:
497:
492:
486:
482:
479:
470:
469:
468:
467:
460:
455:
454:
450:
446:
441:
440:
436:
432:
428:
424:
422:
414:
412:
411:
407:
403:
396:
393:
392:
391:
383:
380:
376:
375:
374:
373:
372:
370:
366:
362:
358:
350:
339:
337:
336:
332:
329:
325:
324:
320:
317:
314:
313:
308:
304:
300:
299:
294:
290:
286:
285:
284:
278:
275:
272:
268:
267:
251:
247:
241:
238:
237:
234:
217:
213:
209:
208:
200:
199:Poland portal
189:
187:
184:
180:
179:
175:
169:
166:
163:
159:
146:
142:
136:
133:
132:
129:
112:
108:
104:
100:
99:
91:
80:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
1372:
1350:
1331:
1271:
1218:
1213:
1158:
1127:
1114:
1108:
1102:
1096:
1090:
1028:
956:
939:
921:
905:
901:
899:
877:
871:
850:
836:
827:
809:
803:
785:
776:
758:
748:
741:
719:
705:
696:(references)
695:
686:
682:
640:
630:
623:
603:
595:
593:
592:
576:
566:
565:
552:
541:Instructions
456:
442:
425:
418:
399:
389:
354:
333:
298:reassessment
296:
281:
280:
276:
245:
205:
140:
96:
40:WikiProjects
1138:Bank Polski
1042:Bank Polski
906:Design date
655:word choice
555:transcluded
369:explanation
293:renominated
116:Numismatics
103:numismatics
59:Numismatics
1465:Categories
1359:talk to me
1284:WP:COPYVIO
1260:talk to me
1225:WP:COPYVIO
1187:WP:WIKICUP
1064:talk to me
969:Small Caps
924:Small Caps
896:Discussion
688:verifiable
508:Authorship
494:GA toolbox
402:FairuseBot
355:The image
340:Not listed
107:currencies
1335:Volunteer
1320:Volunteer
1304:Volunteer
1164:)'s work.
1017:Volunteer
1014:standard.
976:smallcaps
878:Pass/Fail
759:(focused)
567:Reviewer:
531:Templates
522:Reviewing
487:GA Review
474:Volunteer
421:Jozef Bem
1162:contribs
1150:That is
902:Designer
580:contribs
570:Czarkoff
536:Criteria
361:fair use
1389:złotych
1223:And in
872:Overall
659:fiction
631:(prose)
459:WP:BOLD
318:Process
248:on the
143:on the
30:C-class
1274:Plarem
1234:Plarem
1146:groszy
1130:WP:BTW
1054:WP:GAN
1050:groszy
1034:WP:BTW
959:Plarem
829:images
804:stable
802:It is
780:policy
740:It is
681:It is
661:, and
651:layout
622:It is
607:review
589:Status
463:Plarem
415:Mmm...
321:Result
221:Poland
212:Poland
168:Poland
36:scale.
1379:złoty
1338:Marek
1323:Marek
1307:Marek
1142:grosz
1134:denar
1046:grosz
1038:denar
1020:Marek
663:lists
609:(see
557:from
477:Marek
1450:talk
1444:. --
1440:and
1424:talk
1406:talk
1156:talk
1003:talk
987:talk
932:talk
914:talk
904:and
685:and
647:lead
645:for
615:here
611:here
596:only
574:talk
449:talk
435:talk
408:. --
315:Date
240:High
105:and
1386:is
643:MoS
135:Mid
1467::
1452:)
1426:)
1408:)
1232:–
1140:,
1044:,
1005:)
989:)
979:}}
973:{{
934:)
916:)
880::
874::
857::
849:b
843::
835:a
812::
806:.
788::
782:.
761::
757:b
751::
747:a
744:.
726::
722:OR
718:c
712::
704:b
698::
694:a
691:.
667::
657:,
653:,
649:,
639:b
633::
629:a
626:.
605:GA
582:)
451:)
437:)
1448:(
1422:(
1404:(
1356:|
1257:|
1159:·
1154:(
1117:.
1061:|
1001:(
985:(
950:)
930:(
912:(
855:)
841:)
724:)
720:(
710:)
665:)
641:(
577:·
572:(
447:(
433:(
252:.
147:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
