Knowledge

Talk:10 złotych note/GA1

Source 📝

829:. Moving on, if you are the nominator, it assumes you take upon yourself to fix the works by others. So youll have to address all issues, including those introduced by others. Regarding Wikicup, ask the judges. It also depends on whether this so-far still succesful nom is failed, and re-reviewed. I wouldn't worry about Wikicup, there are months left in the 1st round, and last time, a single DYK was enough to move to the second round anyway. -- 460: 437: 423: 392: 368: 341: 331: 306: 292: 278: 247: 213: 42: 629:, there is a typo in "Bank Kassowy", the use of capital letters seems problematic (I am pretty sure MOS discoruages them), there is inconsistent use of Polish diacritics ("dziesięć" vs "DZIESIEC"). Fair use images probably need additional rationale. I am sorry, Czarkoff, but if this is how you review articles, I am afraid I have to take this to 875:
The other thing that needs to be corrected is the issue date for the "2, 5, 10, 20" notes in the "Third złoty banknotes" section. The 50, 100, and 500 probably were in fact issued in 1948 - I don't know off the top of my head, but I'm dead sure that the 10 and 20 came out in early 80's because I
608:
You are right, kiwix fork is a red flag, and this has been raised on talk few days ago, and ignored by the nominator and the reviewer. On a quick glance, lead is poorly formatted (seems too short, and too many paragraphs), there are problem with
590:
Ok, I already stated this above but let me repeat. In additional to some other problems (about which I emailed Plarem and got no response so far), the article uses Knowledge as a source and contains some inaccuracies. It's not up to GA
876:
remember it. This is the section which is using kiwix/wikipedia as a source and it is incorrect. In fact, it's a pretty good example of why Knowledge shouldn't be used as a source.
894:
Actually with the ten zloty note, I think it got introduced in 1950, retired in 1960 (replaced by a coin with Mickiewicz on it) and then a new one was issued in 1982 or so.
47: 849:
I also noticed that this must be a rushed review, as after most of my reviews, I get a bowl of strawberries, or a barnstar for my good work. Now I got nothing. :( –
80: 70: 126: 633:
and ask for a re-review of all of them. PS. This was a quick review, prose was not reviewed, and only few sample paras were checked for style issues. --
122: 866:. It's basically a common error and many people are not aware of the fact that stuff from other languages needs to be translated AND paraphrased. 52: 107: 909:
It's been two days and the copyvio issues have not been addressed. I've removed the offending section. The article should be delisted from GA.
738: 499:
Sorry, just noticed that in the article's body You spell the captions from the notes in ALL CAPS, while on the notes they are spelled in
668:"You are right, kiwix fork is a red flag, and this has been raised on talk few days ago, and ignored by the nominator and the reviewer." 662:
I have to agree with all the points listed above. But I do not take full responsibility for all of them. I take full responsibility for:
99: 181: 415: 187: 75: 869:
Specifically here, the "Design" section is a verbatim translation of the source (even the same phrases are left in all caps)
298: 156: 688:
Those are my first non-free pictures uploaded to Knowledge, I was not fully sure how to write a fair-use rationale.
219: 732: 477:
The only (minor) issue I see with this article is the Infobox: it shouldn't have blanks. Either fill in the
264: 239: 115: 17: 870: 670:
I have added the kiwix ref because I could find nothing else, will be removed in a short space of time.
910: 895: 879: 592: 728: 579: 563: 552: 508: 490: 150: 796:(English): The problem is that an excellent translation of copyrighted text is also copyrighted. 544:
I'm busy fixing the Infobox. At least it hides the unused strings now. As far as I can see, the
92: 860: 835: 801: 763: 639: 405: 227: 674:"On a quick glance, lead is poorly formatted (seems too short, and too many paragraphs)" 766:
points. Do I get them now, or, if it is reassessed, after the second assessment (/GA2)?
354: 223: 191: 692:"the use of capital letters seems problematic (I am pretty sure MOS discoruages them)" 706: 630: 610: 575: 559: 504: 486: 429: 235: 231: 146: 918: 903: 887: 853: 841: 813: 645: 600: 583: 567: 538: 512: 494: 160: 831: 635: 284: 714: 618: 864: 791:"Problem w tym ze doslowne tlumaczenie copyrighted text jest tez copyrighted" 680:"there is inconsistent use of Polish diacritics ("dziesięć" vs "DZIESIEC")." 485:
fields or remove the pipe symbols (|) from the code. Otherwise good work! —
863:, which is a problem with that page - I brought the issue up recently here 762:
Feel free to re-review this article. The only question I have is about the
722: 626: 718: 710: 622: 614: 859:
You're right that there's no mention of verbatim translations in
804:, there is not a word about translated work. Please explain. 699:
But, on the other hand I do not take responsibility for:
827: 524: 134: 103: 574:
I atually fixed Infobox, now it hides empty fields. —
686:"Fair use images probably need additional rationale." 523:
If I remove the pipes, then the infobox is ruined. (
519:The first point has its own issues, unfortunately. 682:; That was just not noticed, therefore not fixed. 548:are only used in the name of the bank. Template 785:Volunteer Marek, in your email to me, you say: 8: 414:(images are tagged and non-free images have 30: 61: 33: 872:and needs to be rewritten/paraphrased. 171:This section is supposed to be edited 832:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 636:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 7: 725:, there is a typo in "Bank Kassowy"" 606:Where is Knowledge used as a source? 534:I am onto the the second point. – 503:. I think that should be fixed. — 409:, where possible and appropriate. 24: 525:For a demonstration, click here. 458: 435: 421: 390: 366: 363:Fair representation without bias 339: 329: 304: 290: 276: 245: 211: 558:should help with this issue. — 530:Can I just write in 'Unknown.'? 190:for what the criteria are, and 676:; I am not a good lead writer. 1: 721:is incorrectly redlinked to 625:is incorrectly redlinked to 459: 436: 422: 391: 367: 340: 330: 305: 291: 277: 246: 212: 919:18:16, 9 January 2012 (UTC) 904:18:45, 7 January 2012 (UTC) 888:18:40, 7 January 2012 (UTC) 854:18:17, 7 January 2012 (UTC) 842:19:43, 7 January 2012 (UTC) 814:18:13, 7 January 2012 (UTC) 646:17:17, 7 January 2012 (UTC) 601:17:07, 7 January 2012 (UTC) 584:22:09, 6 January 2012 (UTC) 568:21:32, 6 January 2012 (UTC) 539:19:57, 6 January 2012 (UTC) 513:12:54, 6 January 2012 (UTC) 495:12:45, 6 January 2012 (UTC) 161:12:45, 6 January 2012 (UTC) 934: 517:Hello Dmitrij D. Czarkoff! 713:is never ilinked, nor is 617:is never ilinked, nor is 705:"there are problem with 201:reasonably well written 428:(appropriate use with 194:for what they are not) 403:It is illustrated by 355:neutral point of view 319:broad in its coverage 18:Talk:10 złotych note 709:(for example, word 613:(for example, word 576:Dmitrij D. Czarkoff 560:Dmitrij D. Czarkoff 505:Dmitrij D. Czarkoff 487:Dmitrij D. Czarkoff 416:fair use rationales 387:No edit wars, etc. 260:factually accurate 826:Regarding kiwix, 430:suitable captions 89: 88: 925: 916: 913: 901: 898: 885: 882: 852: 838: 812: 642: 598: 595: 557: 551: 547: 537: 502: 462: 461: 439: 438: 425: 424: 394: 393: 370: 369: 343: 342: 333: 332: 308: 307: 294: 293: 285:reliable sources 280: 279: 249: 248: 215: 214: 139: 130: 111: 43:Copyvio detector 31: 933: 932: 928: 927: 926: 924: 923: 922: 914: 911: 899: 896: 883: 880: 850: 840: 836: 810: 644: 640: 596: 593: 555: 549: 545: 535: 500: 475: 352:It follows the 326:(major aspects) 175:by reviewer(s). 168: 120: 97: 91: 85: 57: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 931: 929: 907: 906: 891: 890: 877: 873: 867: 847: 846: 845: 844: 830: 821: 820: 819: 818: 817: 816: 807: 806: 805: 793: 788: 787: 786: 776: 775: 774: 773: 772: 771: 770: 769: 768: 767: 751: 750: 749: 748: 747: 746: 745: 744: 743: 742: 729:MathewTownsend 701: 700: 696: 695: 689: 683: 677: 671: 664: 663: 651: 650: 649: 648: 634: 587: 586: 571: 570: 532: 531: 528: 518: 474: 471: 470: 469: 468: 467: 466: 465: 446: 445: 444: 443: 442: 401: 400: 399: 398: 397: 377: 376: 375: 374: 373: 350: 349: 348: 347: 346: 315: 314: 313: 312: 311: 283:(citations to 256: 255: 254: 253: 252: 196: 195: 167: 164: 140: 87: 86: 84: 83: 78: 73: 67: 64: 63: 59: 58: 56: 55: 53:External links 50: 45: 39: 36: 35: 28: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 930: 921: 920: 917: 905: 902: 893: 892: 889: 886: 878: 874: 871: 868: 865: 862: 858: 857: 856: 855: 843: 839: 833: 828: 825: 824: 823: 822: 815: 808: 803: 799: 798: 797: 794: 792: 789: 784: 783: 782: 781: 780: 779: 778: 777: 765: 761: 760: 759: 758: 757: 756: 755: 754: 753: 752: 740: 737: 734: 730: 726: 724: 720: 716: 712: 708: 703: 702: 698: 697: 693: 690: 687: 684: 681: 678: 675: 672: 669: 666: 665: 661: 660: 659: 658: 657: 656: 655: 654: 653: 652: 647: 643: 637: 632: 628: 624: 620: 616: 612: 607: 604: 603: 602: 599: 589: 588: 585: 581: 577: 573: 572: 569: 565: 561: 554: 543: 542: 541: 540: 529: 526: 522: 521: 520: 515: 514: 510: 506: 497: 496: 492: 488: 484: 480: 472: 464: 463: 456: 453: 452: 450: 447: 441: 440: 433: 431: 419: 417: 411: 410: 408: 407: 402: 396: 395: 388: 385: 384: 382: 378: 372: 371: 364: 361: 360: 358: 356: 351: 345: 344: 337: 327: 323: 322: 320: 316: 310: 309: 302: 300: 288: 286: 274: 270: 269: 267: 266: 261: 257: 251: 250: 243: 241: 237: 233: 229: 225: 221: 209: 205: 204: 202: 198: 197: 193: 189: 185: 183: 179: 178: 177: 176: 174: 165: 163: 162: 158: 155: 152: 148: 145: 141: 138: 137: 133: 128: 124: 119: 118: 114: 109: 105: 101: 96: 95: 82: 79: 77: 74: 72: 69: 68: 66: 65: 60: 54: 51: 49: 46: 44: 41: 40: 38: 37: 32: 26: 19: 908: 848: 795: 790: 735: 704: 691: 685: 679: 673: 667: 605: 533: 516: 498: 482: 478: 476: 454: 448: 427: 413: 404: 386: 380: 362: 353: 335: 325: 318: 296: 282: 273:(references) 272: 263: 259: 217: 207: 200: 180: 172: 170: 169: 153: 143: 142: 135: 131: 117:Article talk 116: 112: 93: 90: 81:Instructions 715:Bank Polski 619:Bank Polski 483:Design date 232:word choice 104:visual edit 861:WP:COPYVIO 837:talk to me 802:WP:COPYVIO 764:WP:WIKICUP 641:talk to me 546:Small Caps 501:Small Caps 473:Discussion 265:verifiable 48:Authorship 34:GA toolbox 912:Volunteer 897:Volunteer 881:Volunteer 741:)'s work. 594:Volunteer 591:standard. 553:smallcaps 455:Pass/Fail 336:(focused) 144:Reviewer: 71:Templates 62:Reviewing 27:GA Review 739:contribs 727:That is 479:Designer 157:contribs 147:Czarkoff 76:Criteria 800:And in 449:Overall 236:fiction 208:(prose) 127:history 108:history 94:Article 851:Plarem 811:Plarem 723:groszy 707:WP:BTW 631:WP:GAN 627:groszy 611:WP:BTW 536:Plarem 406:images 381:stable 379:It is 357:policy 317:It is 258:It is 238:, and 228:layout 199:It is 184:review 166:Status 915:Marek 900:Marek 884:Marek 719:grosz 711:denar 623:grosz 615:denar 597:Marek 240:lists 186:(see 136:Watch 16:< 733:talk 580:talk 564:talk 509:talk 491:talk 481:and 262:and 224:lead 222:for 192:here 188:here 173:only 151:talk 123:edit 100:edit 220:MoS 809:– 717:, 621:, 582:) 566:) 556:}} 550:{{ 511:) 493:) 457:: 451:: 434:: 426:b 420:: 412:a 389:: 383:. 365:: 359:. 338:: 334:b 328:: 324:a 321:. 303:: 299:OR 295:c 289:: 281:b 275:: 271:a 268:. 244:: 234:, 230:, 226:, 216:b 210:: 206:a 203:. 182:GA 159:) 125:| 106:| 102:| 834:| 736:· 731:( 694:. 638:| 578:( 562:( 527:) 507:( 489:( 432:) 418:) 301:) 297:( 287:) 242:) 218:( 154:· 149:( 132:· 129:) 121:( 113:· 110:) 98:(

Index

Talk:10 złotych note
Copyvio detector
Authorship
External links
Templates
Criteria
Instructions
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
Czarkoff
talk
contribs
12:45, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
GA
here
here
MoS
lead
layout
word choice
fiction
lists
verifiable
reliable sources

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.