Knowledge

Talk:142857

Source 📝

1384:. This is not about the number one-hundred-forty-two-thousand-eight-hundred-fifty-seven, but rather about that sequence of six digits. By one standard that is in fact out there in the world, that would mean that the title should be 1, 4, 2, 8, 5, 7, but I wonder whether that would raise too many eyebrows, perhaps especially among those who are ignorant of the significance of this sequence and who do not know that there is anything about it to be ignorant of. People who don't remember learning the significance of this sequence when they were twelve or thirteen years old are numerous and walk through the same public squares as the rest of us and look just like normal people. 95: 77: 420:
pick up the scribe or rule without changing the state of its relation to the previously drawn figure. That is why the idea of a continuous line appeared in the Rules of Construction. They did not know why that was 'illegal' but it was because raising the writing tool created a space-time interval in which the atmosphere interrupted continuity of the drawn line. The cosmology of the integers, as well as the forms of hands, are all formed in an atmosphere that is 80% nitrogen, atomic number 7, atomic weight 14.
1361:. Knowledge articles titled as numbers over 100 without dis-ambiguation suffixes are normally for years, and this year is way too far off in the future. No notable event that I understand is expected to happen so far off. Not the expiration of the copyright of 2022 information, not the death of Barack Obama, not even the time when the Julian and Gregorian calendars are a full year apart (we need March 1 48901, which is March 1 48900 in the Julian calendar, for that event.) This article should be at 163: 50: 1266:– Despite the previous RMs, the fact still stands that the topic is not (or should not be) about the integer one hundred and forty two thousand eight hundred and fifty seven but about the repeating number sequence, which may appear as 0.142857142857..., 71.4285714285..., 857.142857142..., etc. The 2018 RM saw IMO some confused !votes which misunderstood the issue. 21: 511:
The section about Pi as 22/7 mentions the "Mediogegnians". I am fairly familiar with Kabbalistic literature and have never heard this term. And a websearch reveals nothing but mirrors of this article. There is no citation. If noone can provide a reference for this statement/term, I'd like to go ahead
1108:
As of 2018-12-06, 142857 is the largest integer with its own wikipedia page which is neither a power of 2 nor a multiple of 10. This is excluding "large integers" such as Graham's number or "largest known prime number", but I feel they shouldn't count in spirit as they are only ever referenced to by
1448:
As we write integers over 9999 using commas, an article called 142857 (no comma) must logically be about the digit sequence rather than the integer. Most of the infobox is therefore not relevant, though the list of divisors gives useful insights as to why the sequence is cyclic. Another question:
423:
For much of history, carbon was the element of choice for writing and drawing. It still is. The atomic number is six, and it is probably what led to the Star of David symbol. Silicon is an emerging element in information technology. To construct a "Star of Silicon" with silicon's atomic number
424:
of 14, a fourteen pointed star is necessary. Calculation of the angle between fourteen equidistant points on the circumference of a circle results in 360/14 = 25.714285714285714285714285714286, containing the repeating sequence 142857. Is 14 silicon's atomic number, or nitrogen's atomic weight?
419:
For instance, light is gravitationally shifted in frequency and wavelength depending on whether it is rising or falling. The effect is slight and difficult to observe and measure even now, but it did make the third dimension different from the two dimensions of the Euclidean plane. One could not
415:
One wonders if possibly the early geometrical constructions were shaped by factors now known to exist, but unknown then. That is, for instance, the difference between the plane constructions (typically on a horizontal table or floor or on a movable object) in contrast with the vertical. The two
884:– This article is about the series of digits "142857", not just the number one hundred and forty two thousand eight hundred and fifty seven. For example, there's a section covering 1/7=0.142857142857142857... As such, it shouldn't be treated as just a number, with a comma separator per 1270:
said, "If we feel that the page is mainly about a sequence of digits, rather than an integer, then let's remove the comma", which I read as partial/conditional support, while noting that comparison with dates should be irrelevant (which I agree with). But
531:
The examples in other bases are still using 7. That section should say whether 7 must be used. If it needn't, then perhaps one of the examples should use something else. If it must, then a mathematical explanation why would be good. --
199:
Try 76,923. Multiply it by 2. The sets of digits are not the same. However, look at all the multiples of 76,923 from 76,923*3 to 76,923*12 and it will have something very similar to 142,857. Any other numbers??
967:
If we feel that the page is mainly about a sequence of digits, rather than an integer, then let's remove the comma. But I think that confusion with dates is a red herring: this format was favoured in
1150: 380:
142857/2 = 71428.5 142857/3 = 47619 142857/4 = 35714.25 142857/5 = 28571.4 142857/6 = 23809.5 142857/7 = 20408.142857... 142857/8 = 17857.125 142857/9 = 15873 142857/11 = 12987 142857/13 = 10989
344: 1017:
Since the other examples are clearly integers, and not affected by this request, I think this is the proper place for discussion? Just disregard the arguments about confusion with years. --
1415:
Per the above, I suggest removing the Number infobox from the top of the article, since it misrepresents the focus of the article as an integer, which should not be the case. --
1154: 443:
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
31: 1228: 856: 769: 765: 751: 580: 1482: 135: 416:
dimensional table does not present any contradiction in modern physics, but in three dimensional constructions the vertical is relativistically distinct.
1434:. This would be ridiculous. So, the article is about the property of the digits of a number. Thus, the infobox must be kept if its title remains a number. 141: 1487: 727: 386:
1/142857 = 0.000007 2/142857 = 0.000014 3/142857 = 0.000021 4/142857 = 0.000028 5/142857 = 0.000035 6/142857 = 0.000042 7/142857 = 0.000049
1477: 1213:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
840:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
564:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
1124: 629:
as the new title. For numbers which are clearly not a year, we seem to be moving from the old convention that number pages were called
493: 328: 1051: 255: 209: 111: 1283:
without addressing the main concern, why and whether the subject should be treated as an integer. Also pinging previous participants
747:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
348: 737: 273:
If I multiplicate 0,142857 with 2 exactly 41 times, I receive 3,1414586....^11 and I found, that I can rebuild 0,142857 from 1/7
181: 1430:
If the article is about the sequence of digits, the notation of sequences must be used; that is, the article should be renamed
1007: 363:
Cyclic numbers have very interesting properties, I wonder if anyone is interested in them and uses them as an ID or something?
1275:
then !voted oppose, citing agreement with Certes, when Certes had not voiced any direct opposition. The only other oppose, by
1249: 968: 1406:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
102: 82: 812: 57: 866: 1204: 1084: 831: 683: 555: 208:
That's because 1/13 = 0.076923076923076923.... The period of the reciprocal of any prime has similar properties.
169: 27: 768:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
537: 390: 400: 1120: 497: 332: 1389: 803: 719: 213: 1291:, and I'll also post to the Numbers and Mathematics WikiProjects in hope of gaining more input this time. 1045: 395: 259: 728:
https://web.archive.org/web/20070929122525/http://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/C/cyclic_number.html
533: 1431: 1370: 1214: 1116: 1094: 841: 787:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
775: 693: 565: 429: 201: 63: 718:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 94: 76: 447: 1112: 995: 324: 20: 1217:
after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1003: 955: 920: 611: 110:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1439: 1420: 1385: 1331: 1296: 1244: 1070: 1022: 936: 893: 731: 474: 772:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1449:
do we remove from Category:Integers? Is there any other relevant category, or is this article
788: 738:
https://web.archive.org/web/20070714114415/http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/CyclicNumber.html
1041: 669: 615: 589: 1458: 1366: 1350: 1307: 1185: 976: 908: 646: 425: 795: 1362: 861: 711: 599: 517: 460: 453: 741: 276:
1/7 = 2/14 <--- 0,_14 1/7 = 4/28 <--- 0,_14_28 1/7 = 8/56 <--- 0,_14_28_56
1284: 1272: 999: 951: 754:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 794:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1471: 1435: 1416: 1327: 1323: 1311: 1292: 1288: 1239: 1066: 1018: 932: 889: 470: 928: 665: 586: 321:
What will be the Factorial of 285714 (i.e. 285784!) -Unknown It's infinity IE ∞.
1454: 1267: 1181: 972: 924: 904: 761: 642: 364: 1276: 1065:
because this is mainly about a series of repeating digits instead of a number.
1310:, it should not have a specific article. Moreover, its content is included in 1280: 1093:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
1037: 885: 760:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 692:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
638: 513: 1345:
per the nominator's rationale, since the article does seem to be about a
988:- Yeah, I'm with Certes on this one. Until further discussion is had, I 1315: 1259: 877: 661: 626: 607: 1319: 1263: 1140: 881: 603: 177: 107: 448:
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb4870/is_200508/ai_n17913296
463:
on 2011-06-01 15:31:06, 404 This requested article does not exist.
456:
on 2011-05-23 03:02:00, 404 This requested article does not exist.
236:
Hey, isn't that 3/7? Now, let's move the four to the back to get
971:
and similar cases which are clearly integers rather than years.
289:
3# result / 6 result / 5 result / 4 result / 3 result / 2
732:
http://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/C/cyclic_number.html
157: 43: 15: 950:
Too large to be a date, about repeating digits not a number.
1462: 1443: 1424: 1393: 1374: 1353: 1335: 1300: 1253: 1189: 1158: 1128: 1074: 1057: 1026: 1011: 980: 959: 940: 912: 871: 817: 673: 650: 619: 592: 541: 521: 501: 478: 433: 405: 367: 352: 336: 263: 228:
Not sure if this was mentioned in the article but notice...
217: 969:
Talk:9,223,372,036,854,775,807#Requested move 21 June 2017
722:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
240:. Hold it. That's 2/7. Get it? Here's the full chart: 168:
On 14 October 2022, it was proposed that this article be
715: 173: 1083:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
682:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
292:
4# multiplicate the result with 2 , exactly 5 times.
742:
http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/CyclicNumber.html
106:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1306:This number has only one notable property. So, per 844:. No further edits should be made to this section. 764:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 568:. No further edits should be made to this section. 317:
What will be the Factorial of 285714 (i.e. 285784!)
56:This article has not yet been rated on Knowledge's 1097:. No further edits should be made to this section. 696:. No further edits should be made to this section. 637:reserved for the year, to a title with commas per 140:This article has not yet received a rating on the 1149:Do not block from editing and appreciate my IQ. 232:=1/7 Now, let's move the one to the back to get 888:. No one is going to confuse this with a year. 750:This message was posted before February 2018. 301:1# 9/8 * 1/7 * 1/6 * 1/5 * 1/4 * 1/3 * 1/2 8: 343:Very large and no reason for anyone to care. 1146:Evidence: "3A6LDH" before, "3A6KDH" after. 1203:The following is a closed discussion of a 1110: 993: 830:The following is a closed discussion of a 554:The following is a closed discussion of a 295:then i receive a term 1/140 = 0,007142857 71: 49: 47: 1036:I think this is the correct approach per 710:I have just modified 2 external links on 1151:2404:3C00:502F:4C80:8531:5CD7:8407:C0FC 73: 1349:rather than specifically an integer. 7: 1222:The result of the move request was: 849:The result of the move request was: 573:The result of the move request was: 345:2601:640:4000:3170:F401:BBC:F63D:578 100:This article is within the scope of 1483:Unknown-importance Numbers articles 411:Origins of Geometrical Construction 62:It is of interest to the following 664:(with commas) as suggested above. 269:Found number PI (3,1415) in 142857 14: 714:. Please take a moment to review 30:on August 5, 2007. The result of 1402:The discussion above is closed. 1143:was edited to avoid misleading. 931:from the previous discussion. -- 161: 93: 75: 48: 19: 896:) 08:39, 15 January 2018 (UTC) 26:This article was nominated for 1229:closed by non-admin page mover 1196:Requested move 14 October 2022 823:Requested move 15 January 2018 606:– Unnecessary number dab. See 581:closed by non-admin page mover 512:and delete that whole section. 1: 1180:= 27300425 is indeed 3A6KDH. 502:16:44, 16 November 2011 (UTC) 120:Knowledge:WikiProject Numbers 114:and see a list of open tasks. 1488:WikiProject Numbers articles 1463:17:24, 21 October 2022 (UTC) 1444:19:25, 14 October 2022 (UTC) 1425:10:52, 14 October 2022 (UTC) 1394:02:34, 17 October 2022 (UTC) 1375:16:46, 15 October 2022 (UTC) 1354:16:24, 15 October 2022 (UTC) 1336:19:39, 14 October 2022 (UTC) 1301:10:52, 14 October 2022 (UTC) 1254:15:55, 21 October 2022 (UTC) 1129:18:22, 6 December 2018 (UTC) 1075:15:42, 31 January 2018 (UTC) 1058:21:15, 24 January 2018 (UTC) 1027:06:33, 18 January 2018 (UTC) 1012:15:23, 15 January 2018 (UTC) 981:15:07, 15 January 2018 (UTC) 960:11:13, 15 January 2018 (UTC) 941:08:42, 15 January 2018 (UTC) 913:19:28, 23 January 2018 (UTC) 872:01:30, 1 February 2018 (UTC) 406:15:48, 24 January 2009 (UTC) 218:16:00, 30 January 2014 (UTC) 123:Template:WikiProject Numbers 1478:Unassessed Numbers articles 1235:Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung 547:Requested move 13 June 2017 542:08:34, 10 August 2014 (UTC) 488:"...also known within this 310:4# = 288/40320 = 1/140 280:and if i do the following: 1504: 781:(last update: 5 June 2024) 707:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 434:18:58, 8 August 2010 (UTC) 368:13:59, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 142:project's importance scale 1190:09:51, 7 March 2021 (UTC) 1159:04:55, 7 March 2021 (UTC) 818:03:06, 14 June 2017 (UTC) 674:09:47, 17 June 2017 (UTC) 651:00:18, 14 June 2017 (UTC) 620:20:00, 13 June 2017 (UTC) 593:01:04, 21 June 2017 (UTC) 522:12:15, 13 July 2013 (UTC) 353:16:53, 16 July 2020 (UTC) 286:2# divide the result / 7 264:20:58, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 204:00:49, 11 Apr 2004 (UTC) 139: 88: 70: 1404:Please do not modify it. 1210:Please do not modify it. 1090:Please do not modify it. 837:Please do not modify it. 689:Please do not modify it. 561:Please do not modify it. 479:15:31, 1 June 2011 (UTC) 359:Very interesting number! 307:3# * 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 703:External links modified 337:19:11, 9 May 2014 (UTC) 298:complete calculation: 1322:must be redirects to 1104:Something interesting 857:closed by page mover 762:regular verification 752:After February 2018 492:of practitioners"? 103:WikiProject Numbers 1432:(1, 4, 2, 8, 5, 7) 1308:WP:NUMBER#Integers 1109:some other name. 806:InternetArchiveBot 757:InternetArchiveBot 58:content assessment 1232: 1131: 1115:comment added by 1014: 998:comment added by 915: 860: 782: 584: 327:comment added by 283:1# divide 9 / 8 224:The Cool Sevenths 192: 191: 156: 155: 152: 151: 148: 147: 42: 41: 1495: 1226: 1212: 1179: 1177: 1176: 1173: 1170: 1092: 1054: 1048: 986:Oppose / Comment 897: 869: 864: 854: 839: 816: 807: 780: 779: 758: 691: 578: 563: 403: 398: 393: 373:Other properties 339: 180:. The result of 165: 164: 158: 128: 127: 126:Numbers articles 124: 121: 118: 97: 90: 89: 79: 72: 53: 52: 51: 44: 23: 16: 1503: 1502: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1468: 1467: 1413: 1408: 1407: 1363:142857 (number) 1208: 1198: 1174: 1171: 1168: 1167: 1165: 1137: 1106: 1101: 1088: 1052: 1046: 867: 862: 835: 825: 810: 805: 773: 766:have permission 756: 720:this simple FaQ 712:142857 (number) 705: 700: 687: 600:142857 (number) 559: 549: 529: 509: 507:"Mediogegnians" 486: 461:142857 (number) 454:142857 (number) 441: 413: 401: 396: 391: 387: 381: 377:Hi. How about: 375: 361: 322: 319: 314: 313:5# 0,007142857 311: 308: 305: 302: 296: 293: 290: 287: 284: 271: 226: 197: 162: 125: 122: 119: 116: 115: 12: 11: 5: 1501: 1499: 1491: 1490: 1485: 1480: 1470: 1469: 1466: 1465: 1446: 1412: 1409: 1401: 1399: 1397: 1396: 1378: 1377: 1356: 1339: 1338: 1257: 1220: 1219: 1205:requested move 1199: 1197: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1136: 1133: 1105: 1102: 1100: 1099: 1085:requested move 1079: 1078: 1077: 1060: 1031: 1030: 1029: 983: 962: 944: 943: 875: 847: 846: 832:requested move 826: 824: 821: 800: 799: 792: 745: 744: 736:Added archive 734: 726:Added archive 704: 701: 699: 698: 684:requested move 678: 677: 676: 654: 653: 598: 596: 571: 570: 556:requested move 550: 548: 545: 534:Ralph Corderoy 528: 525: 508: 505: 485: 482: 467: 466: 465: 464: 457: 440: 437: 412: 409: 389:Interesting? ~ 385: 379: 374: 371: 360: 357: 356: 355: 318: 315: 312: 309: 306: 304:2# = 9/40320 303: 300: 294: 291: 288: 285: 282: 278: 270: 267: 254: 252: 250: 248: 246: 244: 225: 222: 221: 220: 196: 193: 190: 189: 182:the discussion 166: 154: 153: 150: 149: 146: 145: 138: 132: 131: 129: 112:the discussion 98: 86: 85: 80: 68: 67: 61: 54: 40: 39: 32:the discussion 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1500: 1489: 1486: 1484: 1481: 1479: 1476: 1475: 1473: 1464: 1460: 1456: 1452: 1447: 1445: 1441: 1437: 1433: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1422: 1418: 1410: 1405: 1400: 1395: 1391: 1387: 1386:Michael Hardy 1383: 1380: 1379: 1376: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1360: 1357: 1355: 1352: 1348: 1344: 1341: 1340: 1337: 1333: 1329: 1325: 1324:Cyclic number 1321: 1317: 1313: 1312:Cyclic number 1309: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1298: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1278: 1274: 1269: 1265: 1261: 1256: 1255: 1251: 1247: 1246: 1242: 1241: 1236: 1230: 1225: 1218: 1216: 1211: 1206: 1201: 1200: 1195: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1156: 1152: 1147: 1144: 1142: 1134: 1132: 1130: 1126: 1122: 1118: 1117:Frosted butts 1114: 1103: 1098: 1096: 1091: 1086: 1081: 1080: 1076: 1072: 1068: 1064: 1061: 1059: 1055: 1049: 1043: 1039: 1035: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1020: 1016: 1015: 1013: 1009: 1005: 1001: 997: 991: 987: 984: 982: 978: 974: 970: 966: 963: 961: 957: 953: 949: 946: 945: 942: 938: 934: 930: 926: 922: 918: 917: 916: 914: 910: 906: 903: 902: 895: 891: 887: 883: 879: 874: 873: 870: 865: 858: 852: 845: 843: 838: 833: 828: 827: 822: 820: 819: 814: 809: 808: 797: 793: 790: 786: 785: 784: 777: 771: 767: 763: 759: 753: 748: 743: 739: 735: 733: 729: 725: 724: 723: 721: 717: 713: 708: 702: 697: 695: 690: 685: 680: 679: 675: 671: 667: 663: 659: 656: 655: 652: 648: 644: 640: 636: 633:, with plain 632: 631:1234 (number) 628: 624: 623: 622: 621: 617: 613: 609: 605: 601: 595: 594: 591: 588: 582: 576: 569: 567: 562: 557: 552: 551: 546: 544: 543: 539: 535: 526: 524: 523: 519: 515: 506: 504: 503: 499: 495: 494:24.43.110.123 491: 483: 481: 480: 476: 472: 462: 458: 455: 451: 450: 449: 446: 445: 444: 438: 436: 435: 431: 427: 421: 417: 410: 408: 407: 404: 399: 394: 384: 378: 372: 370: 369: 366: 358: 354: 350: 346: 342: 341: 340: 338: 334: 330: 329:94.254.142.63 326: 316: 299: 281: 277: 274: 268: 266: 265: 261: 257: 241: 239: 235: 231: 223: 219: 215: 211: 207: 206: 205: 203: 202:66.32.145.196 194: 187: 183: 179: 175: 171: 167: 160: 159: 143: 137: 134: 133: 130: 113: 109: 105: 104: 99: 96: 92: 91: 87: 84: 81: 78: 74: 69: 65: 59: 55: 46: 45: 37: 33: 29: 25: 22: 18: 17: 1450: 1414: 1403: 1398: 1381: 1358: 1346: 1342: 1258: 1243: 1238: 1234: 1223: 1221: 1209: 1202: 1164:Thank you. 1148: 1145: 1138: 1111:— Preceding 1107: 1089: 1082: 1062: 1042:power~enwiki 1033: 994:— Preceding 989: 985: 964: 947: 900: 899: 876: 851:no consensus 850: 848: 836: 829: 804: 801: 776:source check 755: 749: 746: 709: 706: 688: 681: 657: 634: 630: 597: 574: 572: 560: 553: 530: 510: 489: 487: 468: 442: 422: 418: 414: 388: 382: 376: 362: 323:— Preceding 320: 297: 279: 275: 272: 256:98.169.45.99 242: 237: 233: 229: 227: 210:2.25.131.166 198: 185: 101: 64:WikiProjects 35: 1451:sui generis 1367:Georgia guy 1314:. So, both 1215:move review 1095:move review 842:move review 694:move review 566:move review 527:Other bases 426:SyntheticET 253:.714285=5/7 251:.571428=4/7 249:.857142=6/7 247:.285714=2/7 245:.428571=3/7 243:.142857=1/7 1472:Categories 1281:MOS:DIGITS 1038:MOS:DIGITS 901:Relisting. 886:MOS:DIGITS 813:Report bug 639:MOS:DIGITS 625:I suggest 575:page moved 1285:Galobtter 1273:Paintspot 1139:The page 1000:Paintspot 956:pingó mió 952:Galobtter 796:this tool 789:this tool 484:22/7 as π 439:Dead link 1436:D.Lazard 1417:Paul_012 1347:sequence 1328:D.Lazard 1293:Paul_012 1289:Feminist 1279:, cited 1125:contribs 1113:unsigned 1067:feminist 1019:Paul_012 1008:contribs 996:unsigned 933:Paul_012 919:Pinging 890:Paul_012 802:Cheers.— 660:move to 471:JeffGBot 325:unsigned 28:deletion 1411:Infobox 1382:Support 1343:Support 1316:142,857 1260:142,857 1063:Support 965:Comment 948:Support 929:V2Blast 921:Fish567 878:142,857 716:my edit 666:V2Blast 662:142,857 658:Support 627:142,857 612:Fish567 608:100,000 490:ellipse 238:.285714 234:.428571 230:.142857 174:142,857 117:Numbers 108:Numbers 83:Numbers 1455:Certes 1359:Oppose 1320:142857 1268:Certes 1264:142857 1224:moved. 1182:Certes 1169:24 − 1 1141:142857 1034:Oppose 990:oppose 973:Certes 925:Certes 905:ToThAc 882:142857 643:Certes 604:142857 365:Tyciol 178:142857 60:scale. 1240:mello 514:Ms408 186:moved 172:from 170:moved 1459:talk 1440:talk 1421:talk 1390:talk 1371:talk 1351:╠╣uw 1332:talk 1318:and 1297:talk 1287:and 1186:talk 1155:talk 1135:EDIT 1121:talk 1071:talk 1023:talk 1004:talk 977:talk 937:talk 927:and 909:talk 894:talk 863:Brad 670:talk 647:talk 635:1234 616:talk 587:Guan 538:talk 518:talk 498:talk 475:talk 430:talk 383:and 349:talk 333:talk 260:talk 214:talk 184:was 36:keep 34:was 1245:hi! 1087:. 770:RfC 740:to 730:to 686:. 590:aco 459:In 452:In 195:Try 176:to 136:??? 1474:: 1461:) 1453:? 1442:) 1423:) 1392:) 1373:) 1365:. 1334:) 1326:. 1299:) 1262:→ 1252:) 1250:投稿 1237:, 1233:— 1207:. 1188:) 1157:) 1127:) 1123:• 1073:) 1056:) 1050:, 1040:. 1025:) 1010:) 1006:• 992:. 979:) 958:) 939:) 923:, 911:) 898:-- 880:→ 853:. 834:. 783:. 778:}} 774:{{ 672:) 649:) 641:. 618:) 610:. 602:→ 577:. 558:. 540:) 520:) 500:) 477:) 469:-- 432:) 351:) 335:) 262:) 216:) 1457:( 1438:( 1419:( 1388:( 1369:( 1330:( 1295:( 1277:力 1248:( 1231:) 1227:( 1184:( 1178:⁠ 1175:7 1172:/ 1166:⁠ 1153:( 1119:( 1069:( 1053:ν 1047:π 1044:( 1021:( 1002:( 975:( 954:( 935:( 907:( 892:( 868:v 859:) 855:( 815:) 811:( 798:. 791:. 668:( 645:( 614:( 585:— 583:) 579:( 536:( 516:( 496:( 473:( 428:( 402:1 397:H 392:A 347:( 331:( 258:( 212:( 188:. 144:. 66:: 38:.

Index

Articles for deletion
deletion
the discussion
content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Numbers
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Numbers
Numbers
the discussion
???
project's importance scale
moved
142,857
142857
the discussion
66.32.145.196
2.25.131.166
talk
16:00, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
98.169.45.99
talk
20:58, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
unsigned
94.254.142.63
talk
19:11, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
2601:640:4000:3170:F401:BBC:F63D:578
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.