195:
174:
21:
126:
704:
684:
664:
624:
599:
576:
560:
535:
519:
503:
472:
436:
143:
286:
75:
929:
794:
Should we explain who Bakun et al. are? So something like "seismologists Bakun et. al concluded...". Do we know Bakun's first name? What about
Wentworth, do we have his full name? What about Malone and Bor? I only ask for full names because as a reader, I'm curious who they are (seismologist, friends
839:
One more thing about the table. We're listing out the reference in plain text, rather than using a footnote. I'm not necessarily opposed to this, but it is just a convention I'm not familiar with. Meanwhile we have a named reference "Bakun_3256" that refers to the same pages. I feel like if we can
890:
Thank you for the detailed responses! As you've probably noticed, I'm not that familiar with seismology and the like :) I'm quite satisfied now with what we have now, only thing is the source in the table. Could we link to the corresponding source in the
References section? I have not worked much
768:
Overusing the word "magnitude" is the goal here, and using this shorthand is something that works well. I think most people are familiar with the word magnitude, and know in general terms that it relates to the strength of an earthquake. They know that there's a numerical value for magnitude, so
797:
I added the word "seismologist" to introduce our scientists, and no, we don't have their first names, but I've added their initials across the board. A reader can always follow the links in the refs for more information. The names aren't critical here, and just needed to address them by name to
750:
On this one,we're using the moment magnitude scale for the energy released, and we're also supplying the values for the perceived intensity of the shaking, which is where the
Mercalli Intensity Scale comes in. I think it's fine that they're
118:
291:
895:
where the full source is shown in detail. You could use a normal wikilink, but I feel like there's a template for this sort of thing. Any ideas? Once that is linked I think we're good to go. —
981:
243:
976:
324:
296:
877:
That concludes my initial review. I think we'll be able to address these concerns quite easily in a reasonable amount of time, so I am putting the article on hold. —
314:
253:
32:
871:
Thanks for catching this. It comes down to me just writing the units as I see them in the source. I've converted them to U.S. units and dropped the abbreviations
744:
Should "Severe", "Very Strong", "Moderate", etc. be capitalized? Do they correlate to the
Richter scale? The values/names don't appear to match what's listed at
654:
466:
966:
971:
114:
372:
I will be taking on this review. Please allow several days for me to complete the review, although it's possible I'll have it ready for you tonight :) —
986:
513:
219:
342:
53:
46:
842:
I think in this case having the ref with the page number in plain text is fine. It's simple and let's the reader know the source at a glance.
402:
194:
173:
835:
OK, made the change. I know literally nothing of tables, and have just been using the one version that I know works, so thanks for the tip
202:
179:
740:, which is linked in the table as the header "MMI". I've also made a change by adding it to the lead so the reader gets it right up front
961:
822:
817:
Yes, thanks for catching these items. I'm good at getting the bulk of the idea into the text, but often overlook these small details.
319:
38:
363:
529:
430:
218:, and related subjects on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
154:
892:
847:
106:
865:
along with again questioning using km instead of mi, I also must question the abbreviation vs giving the unit name in full (
658:
674:
446:
426:
909:
I appreciate your very thorough review and the refinements and improvements to the article that have come from it. I
646:
386:
No rush, and it's good to see the that the cup is active. Thanks for jumping in here. Looking forward to your input,
869:). There'd be but four total instances of the unit name in prose, so perhaps spelling it out is the more fitting.
650:
489:
825:
with other articles. Here we're letting the browser decide how to format it, when we could use the more common "
618:
554:
338:
914:
737:
387:
766:
for readers unfamiliar with the notation and are somehow unable to deduce what it is. What are your thoughts?
160:
763:
745:
731:
770:
826:
20:
357:
90:
913:
like the linked ref in the table and am probably going to adopt that style from here on. Many thanks,
42:
638:
570:
497:
454:
95:
840:
find a way to use an inline citation without compromising aesthetics, that would be preferable.
406:
74:
939:
this article to good article class. It was a pleasure working with you, and congratulations! —
589:
450:
947:
941:
921:
903:
897:
885:
879:
394:
380:
374:
367:
353:
821:
I like the table and how we it nicely presents the data, but the formatting seems a little
678:
462:
458:
811:)? I noticed we're also using American English date notation. Same with the last sentence
778:
215:
762:
I get that the M in M7.3 stands for magnitude, but maybe we could also wikilink this to
807:– this earthquake took place in the US. Should we then use "37 miles (60 km)" instead (
955:
207:
808:
422:
211:
783:
OK, I added a link to several instances in different sections of the article
85:
345:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
769:
seeing the numbers there they can easily make the connection to the word.
866:
795:
of Bakun, etc) and also I may want to learn more about them on my own.
730:
Is there somewhere to link to with "intensity of VIII (Severe)"? Maybe
893:
1872_North_Cascades_earthquake#CITEREFBakunHaugerudHopperLudwin2002
891:
with
Harvard citation style, but we should make the text link to
119:
Template:Did you know nominations/1872 North
Cascades earthquake
136:
69:
15:
124:
773:
is also linked twice in the article to help bridge the gap.
59:
117:. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
863:
For example... nearly 30 km (19 mi) ... 30 km (19 mi)
110:
was largely unpopulated, resulting in limited damage?
935:
Looks good! With all the issues addressed, I hereby
206:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
805:Malone and Bor... depth of 60 kilometers (37 mi)
45:. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
982:Low-importance WikiProject Earthquakes articles
115:Knowledge (XXG):Recent additions/2014/December
8:
673:B. Images are provided if possible and are
746:Richter magnitude scale#Richter magnitudes
274:
168:
977:GA-Class WikiProject Earthquakes articles
98:). The text of the entry was as follows:
343:Talk:1872 North Cascades earthquake/GA1
305:
277:
228:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Earthquakes
170:
125:
104:... that the area most affected by the
870:
862:
841:
834:
816:
813:...between 40-60 kilometers (25-37 mi)
812:
804:
796:
782:
767:
749:
735:
972:Knowledge (XXG) Did you know articles
113:A record of the entry may be seen at
7:
200:This article is within the scope of
142:
140:
159:It is of interest to the following
967:Geography and places good articles
596:Fair representation without bias:
433:, or spelling and grammar errors:
33:Geography and places good articles
14:
41:. If you can improve it further,
987:WikiProject Earthquakes articles
927:
702:
682:
662:
622:
597:
574:
558:
533:
517:
501:
470:
434:
234:WikiProject Earthquakes articles
231:Template:WikiProject Earthquakes
193:
172:
141:
73:
19:
248:This article has been rated as
798:differentiate the two studies.
107:1872 North Cascades earthquake
84:appeared on Knowledge (XXG)'s
82:1872 North Cascades earthquake
29:has been listed as one of the
27:1872 North Cascades earthquake
1:
962:Knowledge (XXG) good articles
498:appropriate reference section
222:and see a list of open tasks.
948:22:05, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
922:19:36, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
904:19:19, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
886:00:22, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
703:
683:
663:
623:
598:
575:
559:
534:
518:
502:
471:
435:
395:03:45, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
381:01:58, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
368:01:58, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
94:column on 2 December 2014 (
1003:
254:project's importance scale
655:valid fair use rationales
642:to illustrate the topic?
247:
188:
167:
738:Mercalli Intensity Scale
764:Richter magnitude scale
732:Richter magnitude scale
677:to the topic, and have
416:reasonably well written
203:WikiProject Earthquakes
829:" class, by appending
149:This article is rated
130:
548:broad in its coverage
153:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
128:
57:: November 2, 2014. (
39:good article criteria
530:No original research
833:to the first line.
485:factually accurate
155:content assessment
131:
846:Could we link to
831:class="wikitable"
736:Yes, there's the
679:suitable captions
657:are provided for
333:
332:
268:
267:
264:
263:
260:
259:
135:
134:
68:
67:
64:
994:
944:
934:
931:
930:
919:
900:
882:
832:
771:Moment magnitude
706:
705:
686:
685:
666:
665:
659:non-free content
651:copyright status
626:
625:
601:
600:
578:
577:
562:
561:
537:
536:
521:
520:
514:reliable sources
512:B. Citations to
505:
504:
474:
473:
438:
437:
392:
377:
287:Copyvio detector
275:
236:
235:
232:
229:
226:
197:
190:
189:
184:
176:
169:
152:
146:
145:
144:
137:
127:
77:
70:
62:
60:Reviewed version
51:
23:
16:
1002:
1001:
997:
996:
995:
993:
992:
991:
952:
951:
942:
932:
928:
917:Dawnseeker2000
915:
898:
880:
830:
779:subduction zone
777:Let's wikilink
722:
449:compliance for
390:Dawnseeker2000
388:
375:
337:This review is
329:
301:
273:
233:
230:
227:
224:
223:
216:plate tectonics
182:
150:
129:Knowledge (XXG)
58:
12:
11:
5:
1000:
998:
990:
989:
984:
979:
974:
969:
964:
954:
953:
925:
924:
875:
874:
859:
858:
854:
853:
852:
851:
837:
819:
801:
800:
791:
790:
786:
785:
775:
759:
758:
754:
753:
742:
727:
726:
721:
718:
716:
714:
713:
712:
711:
710:
709:
701:Pass or Fail:
693:
692:
691:
690:
689:
671:
670:
669:
645:A. Images are
633:
632:
631:
630:
629:
608:
607:
606:
605:
604:
585:
584:
583:
582:
581:
567:
566:
565:
544:
543:
542:
541:
540:
526:
525:
524:
510:
509:
508:
481:
480:
479:
478:
477:
459:words to watch
443:
442:
441:
400:
398:
397:
348:
347:
331:
330:
328:
327:
322:
317:
311:
308:
307:
303:
302:
300:
299:
297:External links
294:
289:
283:
280:
279:
272:
269:
266:
265:
262:
261:
258:
257:
250:Low-importance
246:
240:
239:
237:
220:the discussion
198:
186:
185:
183:Low‑importance
177:
165:
164:
158:
147:
133:
132:
122:
112:
111:
78:
66:
65:
50:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
999:
988:
985:
983:
980:
978:
975:
973:
970:
968:
965:
963:
960:
959:
957:
950:
949:
946:
945:
938:
923:
920:
918:
912:
908:
907:
906:
905:
902:
901:
894:
888:
887:
884:
883:
872:
868:
864:
861:
860:
856:
855:
849:
845:
844:
843:
838:
836:
828:
824:
820:
818:
814:
810:
806:
803:
802:
799:
793:
792:
788:
787:
784:
780:
776:
774:
772:
765:
761:
760:
756:
755:
752:
747:
743:
741:
739:
733:
729:
728:
724:
723:
719:
717:
708:
707:
700:
699:
697:
694:
688:
687:
680:
676:
672:
668:
667:
660:
656:
652:
648:
644:
643:
641:
640:
634:
628:
627:
620:
616:
615:
613:
609:
603:
602:
595:
594:
592:
591:
586:
580:
579:
572:
568:
564:
563:
556:
555:Major aspects
552:
551:
549:
545:
539:
538:
531:
527:
523:
522:
515:
511:
507:
506:
499:
495:
494:
492:
491:
486:
482:
476:
475:
468:
464:
460:
456:
452:
448:
444:
440:
439:
432:
428:
424:
421:A. Prose is "
420:
419:
417:
413:
412:
411:
410:
408:
405:review – see
404:
396:
393:
391:
385:
384:
383:
382:
379:
378:
370:
369:
365:
362:
359:
355:
352:
346:
344:
340:
335:
334:
326:
323:
321:
318:
316:
313:
312:
310:
309:
304:
298:
295:
293:
290:
288:
285:
284:
282:
281:
276:
270:
255:
251:
245:
242:
241:
238:
221:
217:
213:
209:
205:
204:
199:
196:
192:
191:
187:
181:
178:
175:
171:
166:
162:
156:
148:
139:
138:
123:
120:
116:
109:
108:
103:
100:
99:
97:
93:
92:
87:
83:
79:
76:
72:
71:
61:
56:
55:
48:
44:
40:
36:
35:
34:
28:
25:
22:
18:
17:
940:
936:
926:
916:
910:
896:
889:
878:
876:
823:inconsistent
715:
695:
636:
611:
588:
547:
488:
484:
415:
409:for criteria
401:
399:
389:
373:
371:
360:
350:
349:
336:
325:Instructions
249:
201:
161:WikiProjects
105:
102:Did you know
101:
91:Did you know
89:
81:
80:A fact from
52:
43:please do so
31:
30:
26:
943:MusikAnimal
899:MusikAnimal
881:MusikAnimal
857:Aftershocks
649:with their
429:", without
376:MusikAnimal
354:MusikAnimal
339:transcluded
225:Earthquakes
208:earthquakes
180:Earthquakes
96:check views
956:Categories
809:MOS:ENGVAR
789:Earthquake
496:A. Has an
490:verifiable
292:Authorship
278:GA toolbox
212:seismology
37:under the
848:reference
827:wikitable
619:edit wars
351:Reviewer:
315:Templates
306:Reviewing
271:GA Review
86:Main Page
867:MOS:UNIT
720:Concerns
675:relevant
637:contain
635:Does it
431:copyvios
407:WP:WIAGA
364:contribs
320:Criteria
151:GA-class
47:reassess
937:promote
757:Preface
696:Overall
621:, etc:
590:neutral
571:Focused
463:fiction
427:concise
252:on the
88:in the
911:really
653:, and
647:tagged
639:images
612:stable
610:Is it
587:Is it
546:Is it
483:Is it
465:, and
455:layout
414:Is it
157:scale.
54:Review
850:then?
751:caps.
467:lists
423:clear
341:from
725:Lead
487:and
451:lead
425:and
358:talk
617:No
569:B.
553:A.
528:C.
447:MoS
445:B.
244:Low
49:it.
958::
815:.
781:.
748:.
734:?
698::
681::
661::
614:?
593:?
573::
557::
550:?
532::
516::
500::
493:?
469::
461:,
457:,
453:,
418:?
403:GA
366:)
214:,
210:,
63:).
933:Y
873:.
361:·
356:(
256:.
163::
121:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
