Talk:1995 Quebec referendum/Archive 2

1133:

aesthetic beauty of the area, but also the values of a large number of million-dollar condos on Sussex which had previously commanded a view of Parliament Hill. The building is also a dreadfully ugly monolithic structure which was obviously (and openly admittedly) intended to evoke a sense of the military might of the country it represented; an evocation totally out of touch with the architectural tone of the rest of the downtown core. The general opinion in Ottawa was that it ought to be redesigned, or at the very least reduced in scale to comply with the city's long-standing codes. The Americans simply went ahead and built it anyway. I am of the opinion that not only does this fit your example pretty well (however transposed,) but it also illustrates that there is nothing novel in the powerful simply doing what they like when faced with the objections of the relatively weak. The real solution lies in compromise; or in the case of Canada/US relations (and maybe its analogues?) the ability of the weak to grin and bear it, gaining their concessions where they can feasibly make their stands and refusing to yield where it is a crucial matter of principle to do so. . . we do, after all, have to get along, since we can't really physically fly our nations elsewhere. . . ;)

1115:

legislation. That's not necessarily being 'above the law,' or even 'acting as though this were the case,' (though I've lived in Quebec long enough to know that provincial politics here is quite often dirtier and more twisted than much of what we see at the federal level . . . while we're on the topic of the perfectly healthy elephants living in the closets of people who are opening others' closets to reveal elephants) it's simply a fact that since Quebec is a province of Canada, it isn't necessarily in a position to decide which of its somewhat peculiar legal vagaries are free from federal meddling. If Quebec behaves unconstitutionally, then going on about jurisdiction is . . . more than a little pointless. It's long been an underpinning of Western political thought that those who didn't vote for the sovereign in a democracy are still subject to its laws. On the other hand, Quebec law, if constitutionally sound, certainly *does* apply to federal actors operating within Quebec. It was clear, but if he's saying that the federal gov't can operate with legal impunity in Quebec, then he can certainly be clear and wrong at the same time.

989:, while refusing to grant an injunction against the holding of the referendum, issued a declaratory judgment to the effect that Bill 1, "which would grant the National Assembly of Quebec the power to proclaim that Quebec will become a sovereign country without the need to follow the amending procedure provided for in Part V of the Constitution Act, 1982", constituted "a serious threat to the rights and freedoms of the plaintiff granted by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms." He found that: 2429:

Commons." For one, you already mention Manning above, so his last name alone should suffice. The "the fact that" construction is also kind of awkward. I'd recommend something like "Manning intended to immediately call for Chrétien's resignation and for a general election if the referendum was successful, even though the Liberals, independent of their Quebec seats, had a sizable majority in the House of Commons." The second, third, fourth paragraphs could probably be combined, too.

1315: 31: 2157: 2134: 2116: 2085: 2061: 2034: 2020: 1991: 1977: 1963: 1928: 1894: 1101:

said building and the surrounding areas, the federal government cannot just ignore it, destroy the building and build something else over it. However, if the Quebec government were to pass a law which is very clearly outside the constitutionally defined jurisdictions of the provinces, then the federal government could very well decide to ignore the law. That's the theory at least. --

1766: 2661:

variation on Singh, that the two files were one, and that the boxes of evidence and the proceedings in the second file, must be placed into the first file of Singh (originally filed in Montreal in 1995). That was not a joinder, but perhaps a "consolidation" (if using the regular dictionary, and not the law dictionary) of two parts of the same file.

257:"In the course of the sole referendum year of 1995, Ottawa a thus attributed citizenships to 43 855 new Quebecers. For the sole moth of Octobre, 11429 certificats were emitted, that is to say 1/4 of the total attributions of the year. It was the first time Quebec saw itself get more citizenships than Ontario. And it never reoccurred since." 992:"All of the actions taken by the Quebec government, and the procedure stated in the draft bill, indicate that the government, through the Premier and other Cabinet Ministers, has undertaken, on behalf of Quebec, to proceed with a unilateral declaration of independence and to obtain Quebec's recognition as a state distinct from Canada. 1482:. I don't think it is appropriate to have the word "status" in the title of this article. This referendum was referred to as an "independence", "sovereignty" or "separation" referendum, although the official term used by the Parti Québecois was "Sovereignty-partnership". Nobody in Canada calls it a "status" referendum. -- 767:

number of citizenship processings with the year of the Ontario election, it is up some 45 per cent. Is the hon. member suggesting that we should somehow slow down the process? Is the hon. member suggesting that it is not proper to have the persons exercise their democratic right to vote? Exactly what is his point?

787:

of the vote it will be done." To further his point, he again pointed to the 49% increase in Ontario during it's election between 1993 and 1994. He also pointed out that the Bloc had "criticized in the past for moving too slowly on the applications. Now they are saying we are moving too fast. Which one is it?"

1647:-I think we should "branch out" the controversies and the contingencies, summarize them and link to new articles, and keep the focus on the referendum and the campaign. It seems most information was added as a "flood" after one report or another, and the bloat seems to be on the pet issues of both sides. 515:

the upward trend of all provinces, an increase of about 8% in Quebec would be expected, but that increase isn't nearly enough to account for an unusual spike in October, unless citizenship grants in October are normally that high - meaning the year before citizenship grants in October were around 8 081.

2660:

Again, as to the Singh file in Montreal: while that was still pending and frozen for all intents, lawyer Brent Tyler filed another "separate" case, which after a foray or two at Quebec Court of Appeal, led to Judge Michel Côté of Quebec Superior Court ruling that the second "case" was indeed merely a

995:"It is manifest, if not expressly stated, that the Quebec government has no intention of resorting to the amending formula in the Constitution to accomplish the secession of Quebec. In this regard, the Quebec government is giving itself a mandate that the Constitution of Canada does not confer on it. 591:

I also wonder how the federal government was going to be sure these new citizens were going to vote "No". In fact, how did they know they were going to vote at all? I suppose I can understand that you might expect them to vote "No", but you can't be sure. I don't know, to me, drawing conclusions from

514:

I'm suspicious about this because of the 8% rise between 1994 and 1995. If there were a dramatic spike in October of that year that was particularly out of the norm, wouldn't it be reflected between these two years? 8% amounts to only a 3 348 change, but 11 429 amounts to 26% of the whole year. Given

478:

Now this is what I was talking about. I found it to be almost true (I calculate 84%), but it's still out of context. There was an 83% increase in British Columbia between 93 an 95, and an 81% increase in Ontario from 1992 to 1995. Either way, what does it really matter as the PQ didn't even take back

1174:

Isn't it? If Ottawa has a height restriction, then 'within the embassy' would be up until the ninth floor, would it not? Are you splitting hairs on technicalities while I'm talking about the *spirit* of a small power dealing with a larger one, or am I misunderstanding what you mean? It seems to me

1114:

I think that's precisely what he said. The Quebec Government cannot pass laws applying to people outside its jurisdiction. On the other hand, neither can the Quebec Government pass laws which contradict federal law, which is to say, the federal government can pass laws which affect existing Quebec

1100:

I am not sure what you mean. Your sentences are not very clear to me. What I know for certain is that the Canadian government cannot just ignore laws passed by a provincial government. For example, if a building is considered historic by the Quebec government and a law has been passed to protect the

944:

Well my friend, I must agree that it certainly seems a public inquiry into the matter would be the only way to get some concrete answers, but I don't think this would be enough evidence to expose a legitimate conspiracy that would justify one. By the sounds of things on both sides of the debate, the

786:

When further pressed later on during Question period, he again reiterated "There is a view at the lead up of every provincial and federal election, including the referendum this time as well as in 1980, that if there is an ability to speed up the processing with the viewing of granting the franchise

766:

Mr. Speaker, what is being done with respect to citizenship processing in the province of Quebec leading up to the referendum is nothing different from any lead up to any provincial campaign. My department has done likewise with the provinces of Manitoba, New Brunswick and Ontario. If we compare the

637:

in the expected Oct. 30 vote. With polls suggesting a close vote, Ottawa is sparing no effort to accredit them. It is also halving the time needed to process certificates for those who have lost theirs. The goal is to have the 10,000 to 20,000 citizenship applications outstanding in Quebec processed

500:

In the course of the sole referendum year of 1995, Ottawa has thus attributed citizenships to 43 855 new Quebecers. For the sole moth of October, 11429 certificates were emitted, that is to say 1/4 of the total attributions for that year. It was the first time Quebec saw itself get more citizenships

667:

Either way, now we have more than one verifiable source that something was up, so I'll remove the disputed tag, but we still don't have any other sources that back-up those specific numbers cited by the Le Devoir article - though this Gazette article puts those numbers in the ballpark, so they seem

433:

While the article makes it seem apparent that something unusual is afoot, looking into the numbers reveals how not-so-out-of-the-ordinary these citizenship grants really were. Frankly it seems a bit of a stretch to point out a conspiracy happening in these numbers. I don't think it's worth pointing

2649:

This is really really vague on the one hand, and probably wrong on the other. "A number of actions in Quebec Superior Court": what does "a number of" mean? I am aware of precisely two files opened, one by Bertrand in Quebec City which seems to have been bifurcated into Bertrand No. 1 and Bertrand

1154:

It's not analogous. My recollection is that the laws of the foreign country apply within the embassy. The US embassy (or an embassy in general) is considered to be American soil with American jurisdiction, and they can do what they want with it provided they comply with international law and the

936:

Again, other mainstream sources to back this up would help. Do we know what they may have been voting for? Was it part of a systemic plot or were the students just clueless about proper procedure on voting? And while 100 000 votes may have swayed the referendum, 32 confirmed illegal votes probably

856:

Are there any other mainstream sources (in English or French) that I could look at about this? (Don't worry, I wont ask you to translate another article, but thank you for translating this one.) I think a few other sources about this might clarify a few things about what was going on and what this

487:

Either the author was wrongfully tried to show that there was a important increase in Quebec but failed to mention (or notice) that the same was true for the other provinces, or, more likely, he was trying to give an idea of the general trend before going into further details for the months just

850:

On the basis of information received from the Chief Electoral Officer and Control of Quebec Health Insurance Manager, the PQ militants had endeavoured to demonstrate that these 100 000 names registered on the electoral list did not figure on the list of recipients of the RAMQ. At the end of an

808:

The biggest concern I would have is something the Bloc member brought up - were security checks bypassed to certify these new citizens? The Bloc member suggests yes. Sergio Marchi says no. I'll keep looking for a definite answer to that question. In the meantime, I think all of this should be

2428:

This part has some problems: "Reform leader Preston Manning intended to immediately call for Chrétien's resignation and for a general election if the referendum was successful. This was despite the fact that the Liberals, even disregarding Quebec seats, had a sizable majority in the House of

1716:-Bertrand v. Quebec, which resulted in a declaration from the Superior Court before the referendum that it was illegal, but refused an injunction. I'm think of just throwing in a sentence or two, as Quebec's lawyers defaulted, but it did result in some minor changes to the Sovereignty bill. 1132:

Brings up an interesting, somewhat unrelated, but perhaps analogous point, however. Take the American Embassy in Ottawa. The Embassy plans violated Ottawa's building codes. The building was too tall for the area of the Byward Market in which it was placed, and this threatened not only the

427:

It seems to me that if there were a conspiracy to quickly register new citizens who'd vote "No" in the referendum, that spike would have occured (at the earliest) between 1994 and 1995, when the PQ took back power. Yet between 1994 (40 507) and 1995 (43 855) there was only an 8% increase in

846:

It is not the first time that are facts letting people believe that the federal resorted to doubtful operations to inflate the vote of No side are brought under the light. In 1998, the PQ members in the region of Montreal submitted to the national council of their party a dossier aiming to

653:

Still, this makes me wonder: Is this really underhanded or fundamentally wrong? To give residents of Quebec the right to vote in a referendum deciding it's future? It seems only natural - part of the democratic process to make sure everyone effected gets there say. I continue to think the

930:

It is also the determination of the PQ members from the Estrie region that contributed to the exposure of the electoral fraud in this area. In the spring of 1998, 32 students of Bishop University, in Lennoxville, were condemned to have voted illegally during the referendum of 1995.

563:

As of the end September 1995, senior officials at Citizenship and Immigration Canada gave the order to accelerate the process of attribution of certificates and to prioritize the requests which were on standby at the time of the launch of the referendum campain.

1522:

No move is needed. The current title is sufficiently precise: there were no other Quebec-wide referendums in 1995. It is also the common name. Nobody calls it a "status" referendum. There is no need to name referendum articles in a systematic way worldwide.

2653:

The Singh file was NEVER "consolidated" under the Bertrand file. I suspect the author of that word "consolidated" meant "joindered", a possibility under the Quebec Code of Civil Procedure, but a difficult possibility when the files are in different cities.

829:

Overall, I think if you're really looking for a conspiracy in these numbers, you'll find one. But outside of that, I don't really think any of this proves anything particularly suspicious or out of the ordinary was happening. But, that's just how I see it.

1617:

A section was added claiming there was voter suppression in certain localities, yet the only source is a 2014 article from the Montreal Gazette which itself cites dubious sources. Could we obtain a statement from a more reliable publication or judgement?

1044:

should this be added under the section, preparation for YES? According to his memoir, Chretien noted that he prepared a speech to give the next day, in case if the Yes side won. The speech would denouce the referendum as illegal and therefore invalid.

1081:

On the question of provincial laws applying to the federal government, well that simply isn't true. The federal government is not above the law even though it has often acted as if it were the case. The link between the illegal money of 1995 and the

557:

In fact, this kind of "significant" rising and falling has happened before. Between 1988 and 1990 there was a "sudden" 77% increase throughout the whole country. From there, the number steadily grows until 1996, which saw the aforementioned drop of

472:

According to statistics compiled by the analysts of Citizenship and Immigration Canada, the number of attributions of citizenship in Quebec suddenly rose from 23 799 in 1993 to 43 855 in 1995, that is to say a rate of increase in 87 % in two years.

292:

got from Ottawa in 1999, is is true that for the sole month of October, 1/4 of all citizenships were granted and that 11429 beats the number Ontario got during the same month. Comparing today's data with that of 1999 would be a good check also. --

506:

I'm still trying to find where in these reports, or anywhere else, I'd find month-by-month numbers. They don't seem to be available in the reports published. I'm wondering where Le Devoir got this information. Is there another source to back this

632:

OTTAWA (Special) - Citizenship Court judges from across Canada are being sent into Quebec to work overtime on ensuring as many qualified immigrants as possible gain their Canadian citizenship before the referendum. Most of Quebec's new Canadians

714:

August 31, 1995 - roughly two months before the vote. The article does mention that Ottawa was "also halving the time needed to process certificates for those who have lost theirs", but it unfortunately doesn't mention anything about laws being

1549:. The question is: is it a convention that may be broken, or is it a policy that must be abided by? I have a feeling it is the latter. And if it is the latter than we'll have to discuss a change in policy before leaving the page like it is. -- 2700: 439:

But I wanted to ask if I've overlooked anything (which wouldn't surprise me). Again, as I said, I can't read French very well, so I can't be sure was said in the Le Devoir article. As well I'm not very good at math, so my numbers could be

1095:

The Quebec government can pass laws applying to people operating withing its jurisdiction. The Canadian government does not operate within its jurisdiction, but outside it. Thus Quebec laws do not apply to the Canadian government.

851:

exhaustive examination of the dossier, the Chief Electoral Officer had finally recognized that 56 000 people registered on the electoral list did not have the right to vote and that these names were to be erased from the list.

367:

to help me on this one, because I haven't had to do a problem like this for a while. My girlfriend took a course on statistics, but unfortunately she's out of town and can't help me with this, so this is all my own work

898:

I'm also curious about whether or not anything along these lines (people voting illegally due to not being properly registered) may have happened before, in previous referenda or elections (and not necessarily just in

468:

The information collected by Le Devoir shows that Ottawa conceived and implemented a wide-scale plan of intervention to substantially inflate the number of voters willing to vote against the sovereignty of Quebec.

2701:

https://books.google.ca/books?id=7jDvBQAAQBAJ&pg=PT504&dq=bertrand+v.+quebec&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjQg4TK1ObLAhUBPxQKHZ2TDoAQ6AEIHzAB#v=onepage&q=bertrand%20v.%20quebec&f=false

884:

think voting "Yes" meant independence, it doesn't seem the media in Quebec was doing a very good job informing the public on the consequences of a "Yes" vote. But, to each their own agenda, I suppose. --

919:

Making the point that the electoral list comprised a greater number of illegals than the majority of No votes over Yes votes, the sovereignists never ceased claiming that Ottawa stole their referendum.

126:

which is the most boring book to read as it contains mostly a series of evidence in the form of bills and cheques incriminating Option Canada members and collaborators. The evidence was kindly given to

1074:"Provincial laws did not applied to federal government who spent over 30M$ between october 1st and october 30th on federalist propaganda such as public held and flags. It was later recalled in the 338:

Further, according to these reports, from 1992 to 1995 Ontario consistently had not only the most citizenship grants, but a majority of citizenship grants throughout the country, pulling in over

689:

What is the date for this article? What is not written in this article is that in order to process all these people, Ottawa had to violate its own immigration law procedures and regulations. --

479:

power until 1994, and as I said before there was only an 8% increase between 1994 and 1995 in Quebec. The real spike occured a year earlier, and happened throughout the country, not just Quebec.

2299:

Did all the other parties boycott the Commission? If so, it might just be better to say "The other major parties all boycotted the Commission.", which also resolves the passive voice problem.

2646:

The post currently says: "The looming referendum prompted a number of actions in the Quebec Superior Court, which were consolidated under the application of prominent lawyer Guy Bertrand."

1546: 2657:

In fact, a law article by H. Wade MacLauchlan indicated that the filing of "Singh" subsequent to the filing of "Bertrand" "sparked" the advisory reference to the Supreme Court of Canada.

1719:-More polls reflecting Quebec's general feelings would be nice, even a separate section. Article as is is a bit too leader centric, in my mind (this is generally what sources reflect) 1234:

had rejected numerous ballots without valid reasons, (for instance, rejecting ballots with check-marks or "X"s that were crooked, too large, made with a pen instead of a pencil, etc.)

976:

I have not seen a good reference in Wiki to this law, the one that sets up the "umbrella" committees, and their financing. Is there one? If so, where is it? If not, why not start one?

880:

I most certainly agree. You may be right about a lack of cynical coverage outside of Quebec of the federalist side during the referenudm, but given polls that showed Quebecers didn't

1003:"The constitutional change proposed by the Government of Quebec would result in a break in continuity in the legal order, which is manifestly contrary to the Constitution of Canada." 1771: 2224:

There are no errors that I can see, but the lede is a little thin for an article this long. Maybe a sentence or two more on background, and a bit about the course of the campaign?

617:

Good point, and my skepticism about how they would vote is even more definitely corrected by this article (which took forever to find) published before the vote in the Gazette:

2440:*Where you have "pursuant to" you can nearly always just write "under". It's a style thing, not a rule, so if you disagree, it's fine. I just think it reads better that way. 422:

It is fair to point out a spike in citizenship grants between 1993 and 1994 in Quebec, but it's important to add that this was a trend true of both Ontario and B.C. as well.

153:

The first source for the other scandal, that of the illegal attribution of citizenship papers to about 11 429 permanent residents just during the month of October 1995 is a

1286: 737: 187:

Mathieu, about that last source you reference, regarding the citizenship list theory. Unfortunately I cannot read French very well, so I can't be sure what's said in the

1872: 741: 865:

All French language media reported on this as far as I remember. Welcome to Canada, half the citizens gets half the news and the other half gets what's left. ;-) --

1916: 1804: 208:. According to them, the numbers used in your source regarding the number of people granted citizenship in Quebec, found on the last page of each PDF, are correct. 1385: 310:

I'd have to agree, but unfortunately the reports by Citizenship and Immigration Canada only show annual totals rather than monthly. I'll keep looking, though. --

2711:

If this is incorrect, by all means, change and cite; I sense a bit of anger in your response, our only agenda is the truth. Appreciate you pointing this out.

1794: 1776: 1078:

as a complaint from quebecers. However no illegal behavior where seen in those acts since provincial laws should not be applied to federal government."

2108: 1694:

While kind of neat, the red/blue bar didn't really add anything to the article and took up far too much space. If anyone objects, please let me know.

577:

The Radio-Canada report was more detailed. Some people claimed to have received their citizenships in a gymnasium with a bunch of other immigrants. --

1920: 1912: 1155:

agreements made with the host country. Entirely different from what amounts to domestic federal-provincial dispute over jurisdiction. 24 June 2007

2675:

In the result, there was no consolidation of "a number of actions" under the Bertrand file. Wondering where you got that alleged information?

1969: 1904: 1730:'s recent edits, there were a few such incidents, I'm just earmarking them in my Cardinal and am hopefully going to introduce a new paragraph. 545:

On the other hand, the post-referendum year of 1996 was marked by a significant fall of 39 % of attributions of citizenships to Neo-Quebecers.

925:

But when you consider all the rejected "No" ballots mentioned earlier in this Knowledge article, it all balances out, right? ;-) Only joking.

59: 1422: 1282: 1245: 1022: 1370:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a

83:

were reported in the French language media even during the 1995 referendum campain. However, the first serious journalistic enquiry into

2243:

I've always been a bit loath to use the term, as I believe the preference here would be Quebecois. Am willing to be corrected, though.

847:

demonstrate that more than 100 000 voters registered on the electoral list used for the 1995 referendum did not have the right to vote.

959:

I'll look for other media that covered it. However, there is a limit to what we can find online. Links tend to go broken over time. --

2126: 1862: 1625: 197: 2682: 998:"The actions taken by the Government of Quebec in view of the secession of Quebec are a repudiation of the Constitution of Canada. 136: 157:

article. I have yet to find an English media that also covered the topic, but I am still searching. The said article, published by

1015:

Secession is generally a break with the rule of law and the constitutional order. No surprise there. G. Csikos, 28 November 2007

2122: 1955: 1908: 1822: 1052: 542:

The federal government thus decreed as many citizenships in Quebec, than there were new voters registered on the electoral list.

115: 2392:"Both committees had an authorized budget of $ 5 million each." Maybe "Each committee had an authorized budget of $ 5 million."? 135:

the minute they learned about the publication of the book, something they had neglected to do since at least 1997) and also the

2047: 1868: 1843: 1799: 1507: 1465: 1430: 1426: 119:, he was demoted to different job and subsequently quit Radio-Canada. This event caught of lot of media attention at the time. 2650:

No. 2; and the other in Montreal by Singh, Henderson et als. led by law professor Stephen Allan Scott and lawyer Brent Tyler.

2189:

I'll have intermittent internet access over the next few days. I apologize for the delay, but I will get to this next week. --

1983: 79:

This goes way back. The illegal spendings by the federal governement and various private groups revolving around mostly the

600:

They have just sweared the allegiance to the Queen of Canada. Even I would have voted No under these circumstances. ;-) --

1434: 1418: 47: 17: 2264:

A brief description of the Meech Lake Accords would add some context. Not a whole paragraph, just a sentence or two.

1537:

I agree that when people in Canada say Quebec referendum 1980 or 1995 nobody gets mixed up. As much as I agree with

1408: 1330: 1259:

I don't recall about 1995, but all the (Quebec-located) elections I remember being a part of, they gave us pencils.

1442: 38: 2598:

Sorry, was on vacation. I'll try and do something tonight. Tough to fit the whole thing in and keep it snappy.

1071:

This paragraph strikes me as being very POV and doesn't really contribute any factual information to the article:

1900: 1394: 1361: 869: 581: 534: 205: 201: 2361:"...who had no input with regard to the drafting." could probably just be "...who had no input in the drafting." 986: 949: 492: 1417:

The standard naming convention for referendums is - "Demonym subject, year". The new title is consistent with

1249: 1238:

shouldn't 'pen' and 'pencil' be swapped? The ballots were surely not required to be filled out with pencils?

1026: 1945: 1629: 1528: 1404: 1326: 80: 2404:"Bouchard strongly attacked the rally..." is rather purple prose. Maybe "Bouchard criticized the rally..."? 1675:

I've noticed a new IP bringing unsourced changes to the article the last few days without any discussion.--

945:

other side was plotting against them, but isn't that always the way with big political events like this? --

2026: 2012: 1818: 1322: 1056: 1004: 977: 530:

Other French language media covered the issue. I remember seeing a report on this in Radio-Canada TV. --

2686: 1713:

I've worked on a lot of edits to this article, just some items I'd rather have discussed before adding:

1603: 1438: 1371: 1294: 1220: 2699:

My source for the information was from Haljan's "Constitutionalizing Secession", here is the footnote:

1281:

There is some question as to the appropriateness of the current article title, as well as the title of

329:

received more granted citizenships in 1995 by a difference of 84 143. Not only more than Quebec, but a

2678: 2283:"...their popular vote total (44.75%) was considered disappointing." By whom? This needs a citation. 1621: 1390: 1241: 1205: 1048: 1018: 2546:

Lede??? Sorry but english is my 2nd language. My comment was mostly directed to Knopper. Sorry :( --

2254:"...new Prime Minister Brian Mulroney..." maybe "newly elected Prime Minster..." might sound better. 946: 907:

There was a big fraud case involving the Quebec liberals in 1998. I can look for it if you want. --

885: 831: 810: 669: 451: 311: 158: 2617: 2589: 2521: 2455: 2375: 2322: 2208: 2194: 2179: 1837: 1502: 1460: 1083: 1075: 113:

continued the enquiry and made a lot of his findings public on French television. After publishing

1736:

Any thoughts/comments, please message me. I'd especially appreciate any sovereignist viewpoints.

1260: 1176: 1134: 1116: 88: 2547: 2491: 1676: 1538: 1524: 417:

and 1995 in Ontario, though this drops off when only measuring between 1993 and 1995 (about 50%).

391:

Meaning the article's claim is almost correct, but is, however, out of context, as I also found:

2720: 2690: 2621: 2607: 2593: 2555: 2525: 2499: 2477: 2459: 2379: 2326: 2312: 2274:

Same for the Charlottetown Accord. To a non-Canadian, it's not clear what's being talked about.

2212: 2198: 2183: 1847: 1745: 1703: 1684: 1665: 1633: 1584: 1568:

a name change will confuse people. The Guideline is by no means an ironclad rule: it states: "

1558: 1532: 1512: 1491: 1470: 1446: 1398: 1298: 1268: 1253: 1224: 1184: 1137: 1119: 1105: 1090: 1060: 1030: 1007: 980: 963: 911: 888: 834: 813: 693: 672: 604: 454: 314: 297: 178: 146: 1580: 1554: 1487: 1264: 1180: 1570:

it is a generally accepted standard that editors should attempt to follow, though it is best

522:

Regardless, it'd probably just be best to find another source that can back up these numbers.

2716: 2603: 2551: 2495: 2473: 2308: 2098: 1741: 1699: 1680: 1661: 1290: 1211: 92: 654:

sovereignists are over-reacting by saying the election was thusly "stolen" because of this.

465:

Did the No camp steal the 1995 referendum? New documents accredit the sovereignist thesis.

2236: 128: 248:

The article does not refer to the ratio over that period. Here is what the article says:

2613: 2585: 2517: 2451: 2371: 2318: 2204: 2190: 2175: 1833: 1497: 1455: 1102: 1087: 960: 908: 866: 690: 601: 578: 531: 489: 294: 175: 110: 1337:

The discussion has been closed, and the result will be found in the closer's comment.

364: 2335:

You write about a "Yes" vote without saying which side was "Yes" and which was "No".

744: 99: 84: 2672:

And see what you can make of it. But I don't think you will find any joinders here.

2667: 1644:

Hi folks, just proposing a few things I'd like to do. Would love to hear thoughts:

1725: 1593: 1576: 1550: 1483: 232:

In 1993, the Quebec : Ontario ratio of granted citizenships was 23 779 : 85 525.

106: 2303:

I don't think "all" other parties did, Federal and provincial NDP may not have.

2712: 2599: 2581: 2469: 2304: 1737: 1695: 1657: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2416:

A link or brief description for "allophones" would be helpful to non-Canadians.

1602:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a

736:

Right around this time, a BQ member of parliament found out about this, and

235:

In 1995, the Quebec : Ontario ratio of granted citizenships was 43 855 :

154: 1825:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. 1433:

and many others. Please note that there is a parallel move request over at

1210:

I'm in the process right now of giving all appropriate editors due credit.

550:

Of all total citizenship grants in Canada there was an average drop of 32%.

2664:

You might like to have a look at the plumitif (docket) in Bertrand No. 1:

1086:

is pretty obvious, but nothing in this paragraph helps to support it. --

409:

Which is only 1% less than Quebec. For the sake of reference, there was

122:

Nothing got more media attention however than his recent publication of

363:

I'm not the best with math so I ask you to be patient with me. I asked

165: 139:

which announced yet another inquiry on the illegal spendings of 1995.

2580:

Lede means the lead section, the first few paragraphs. Any progress,

1733:-I included the Chretien knife incident at the end, too prejudicial? 1175:

you've used something irrelevant to the comparison to invalidate it.

266:

Maybe that was not clearly what was implied in the Knowledge article.

142:

There are a lot of online sources on this suject if you read French:

1287:

Knowledge talk:Canadian Wikipedians' notice board#Quebec referendums

445:

Makes me think, I suppose these are all things I should work on ;-).

2490:

Glad to see things are moving along. Anything I can do to help?--

747:

during Question period (see "Immigration"). He said, in response:

569:

Again, are there any other sources that could back this claim up?

1204:

NOTE: Source material from this article was used in the article

132: 2612:

That looks great. I'm happy to promote this to Good Article. --

2468:

I think so. I'll get on it. Really appreciate all your help.

353:

The data also shows an increase in certificate attributions by

2258:

Prime Ministers technically aren't elected, they're appointed.

1572:

treated with common sense, and occasional exceptions may apply

1309: 25: 2203:

OK, I'm back. I'll get started today, sorry for the delay. --

1650:-I'm going to work on sourcing elements of the campaign. 1360:

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a

229:

According to the numbers I'm looking at, this is false.

2351:

You could probably combine notes 1 and 4, couldn't you?

1348: 1344: 398:, between 1993 (19 336) and 1995 (35 552) there was a 380:, between 1993 (23 779) and 1995 (43 855) there was a 1592:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a

635:

traditionally are federalists and expected to vote No

288:

The verification to be made would be, using the data

219:

It was the first time that Quebec residents received

147:

Collection of articles on Option Canada at Vigile.net

75:

Sources for illegal spendings and citizenship scandal

2516:

The only thing left is to expand the lede a bit. --

1374:. No further edits should be made to this section. 2450:I think the only thing left is the lede, right? -- 1606:. No further edits should be made to this section. 2668:http://en.calameo.com/books/0001117904b86352bb16d 2102:and other media, where possible and appropriate. 1040:Chretien Planned to Denouce Referendum as Illegal 213:However, currently this Knowledge article claims: 167:Le camp du NON a-t-il volé le référendum de 1995? 985:On September 8, 1995, Mr. Justice Lesage of the 764: 630: 972:Referendum Judged Effectively Unconstitutional 223:residents, which has not occurred again since. 2107:(images are tagged and non-free content have 501:than Ontario. And it never reoccurred since. 373:Using the formula Dr. Math gave me, I found: 161:on November 8, 1999 can be read online here: 8: 461:Full translation of Pierre O'Neill's article 170:(Did the NO side steal the 1995 referendum?) 2174:I'll review this over the next few days. -- 1435:Talk:Quebec referendum, 1980#Requested move 2676: 1889:(prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar) 1754: 221:more citizenship certificates than Ontario 100:Unity group waged secret referendum battle 1656:Let's start a discussion about this! :-) 131:(which requested an investigation by the 1785: 1757: 742:Minister of Citizenship and Immigration 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1321:It was proposed in this section that 7: 1423:Puerto Rican status referendum, 1998 1379:The result of the move request was: 1283:Quebec independence referendum, 1980 488:before and after the referendum. -- 174:I can translate it upon request. -- 2239:would make sense in here somewhere? 1480:Quebec sovereignty referendum, 1995 347:This article goes on to claim that: 1547:naming convention for such matters 1277:Article title (possible page move) 277:Lost in translation, I'm sure ;-). 198:Citizenship and Immigration Canada 91:who published this article in the 24: 2435:Spending limits and Option Canada 592:all this seems a bit far-fetched. 342:of citizenship grants every year. 137:Chief Electoral Officer of Quebec 2155: 2132: 2114: 2083: 2059: 2056:Fair representation without bias 2032: 2018: 1989: 1975: 1961: 1926: 1892: 1823:Talk:Quebec referendum, 1995/GA1 1454:per standard naming convention. 1313: 196:I'm looking at two reports from 116:The Black Book of English Canada 29: 1871:for what the criteria are, and 1431:Bonaire status referendum, 2004 1427:Mahoran status referendum, 1976 402:increase in citizenship grants. 384:increase in citizenship grants. 333:difference than 61 746 in 1993. 2317:OK, Brest left as is, then. -- 1685:20:07, 19 September 2014 (UTC) 1409:Quebec status referendum, 1995 1331:Quebec status referendum, 1995 191:article, so I thought I'd ask. 1: 1746:19:11, 16 February 2015 (UTC) 1666:14:07, 2 September 2014 (UTC) 1299:13:18, 27 December 2010 (UTC) 1285:. Centralized discussion at 1254:13:26, 14 December 2009 (UTC) 1230:Rejected ballots - pen/pencil 1225:16:51, 24 December 2008 (UTC) 1185:23:24, 30 November 2008 (UTC) 1031:02:41, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 1008:17:47, 4 September 2007 (UTC) 981:17:33, 4 September 2007 (UTC) 460: 179:00:00, 20 February 2006 (UTC) 2156: 2133: 2115: 2084: 2060: 2033: 2019: 1990: 1976: 1962: 1927: 1893: 1704:19:39, 23 January 2015 (UTC) 1653:-Pictures would be helpful. 1419:Saar status referendum, 1935 809:mentioned in the article. -- 668:reasonable at this point. -- 2622:12:14, 25 August 2015 (UTC) 2608:17:11, 24 August 2015 (UTC) 2594:10:01, 20 August 2015 (UTC) 2556:16:21, 19 August 2015 (UTC) 2526:11:31, 18 August 2015 (UTC) 2500:19:59, 17 August 2015 (UTC) 2478:19:14, 13 August 2015 (UTC) 2460:11:28, 13 August 2015 (UTC) 2327:11:35, 12 August 2015 (UTC) 1496:Sovereignty is fine by me. 1106:14:47, 15 August 2005 (UTC) 124:Les secrets d'Option Canada 18:Talk:1995 Quebec referendum 2739: 2721:19:50, 29 March 2016 (UTC) 2691:17:15, 23 March 2016 (UTC) 2380:19:16, 4 August 2015 (UTC) 2313:23:05, 5 August 2015 (UTC) 2213:16:24, 4 August 2015 (UTC) 2199:03:19, 1 August 2015 (UTC) 1585:02:43, 24 March 2014 (UTC) 1559:00:55, 24 March 2014 (UTC) 1533:23:15, 23 March 2014 (UTC) 1513:19:19, 23 March 2014 (UTC) 1492:16:07, 23 March 2014 (UTC) 1471:00:53, 23 March 2014 (UTC) 1447:00:45, 23 March 2014 (UTC) 1399:01:01, 31 March 2014 (UTC) 1138:05:26, 18 March 2007 (UTC) 1120:05:13, 18 March 2007 (UTC) 1061:01:11, 23 March 2008 (UTC) 2184:18:10, 27 July 2015 (UTC) 1848:18:10, 27 July 2015 (UTC) 1634:09:16, 6 April 2014 (UTC) 1091:07:59, 24 July 2005 (UTC) 889:22:52, 10 June 2007 (UTC) 842:Other doubtful manoeuvres 814:22:52, 10 June 2007 (UTC) 694:13:47, 10 June 2007 (UTC) 673:04:27, 10 June 2007 (UTC) 149:(Most articles in French) 1599:Please do not modify it. 1367:Please do not modify it. 1269:05:51, 23 May 2010 (UTC) 987:Superior Court of Quebec 964:23:07, 9 June 2007 (UTC) 950:22:11, 2 June 2007 (UTC) 912:23:07, 9 June 2007 (UTC) 870:23:07, 9 June 2007 (UTC) 835:22:11, 2 June 2007 (UTC) 605:23:07, 9 June 2007 (UTC) 582:23:07, 9 June 2007 (UTC) 535:23:07, 9 June 2007 (UTC) 493:23:07, 9 June 2007 (UTC) 455:08:26, 2 June 2007 (UTC) 315:22:26, 2 June 2007 (UTC) 298:16:25, 2 June 2007 (UTC) 2235:Do you think a link to 1882:reasonably well written 1405:Quebec referendum, 1995 1381:No consensus, not moved 81:Liberal Party of Canada 1875:for what they are not) 1323:1995 Quebec referendum 769: 640: 360: 357:between 1993 and 1995. 226: 2096:It is illustrated by 2048:neutral point of view 2004:broad in its coverage 1709:Topics for Discussion 1640:Reform of the article 350: 216: 42:of past discussions. 1690:Removed red/blue bar 1206:Canadian sovereignty 434:out in this article. 325:Which means Ontario 2345:Referendum question 2109:fair use rationales 1084:sponsorship scandal 1076:sponsorship scandal 428:citizenship grants. 95:on March 20, 1997: 2642:Bertrand v. Quebec 2080:No edit wars, etc. 1941:factually accurate 2693: 2681:comment added by 2127:suitable captions 1956:reference section 1813: 1812: 1624:comment added by 1613:Voter suppression 1389: 1386:non-admin closure 1355: 1354: 1327:renamed and moved 1244:comment added by 1063: 1051:comment added by 1033: 1021:comment added by 413:increase between 72: 71: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 2730: 2445:Remaining issues 2159: 2158: 2136: 2135: 2118: 2117: 2087: 2086: 2063: 2062: 2036: 2035: 2022: 2021: 1993: 1992: 1979: 1978: 1970:reliable sources 1965: 1964: 1930: 1929: 1896: 1895: 1767:Copyvio detector 1755: 1729: 1636: 1601: 1510: 1505: 1500: 1468: 1463: 1458: 1439:Stephen J Sharpe 1383: 1369: 1317: 1316: 1310: 1256: 1216: 1046: 1016: 396:British Columbia 93:Montreal Gazette 87:was the work of 68: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 2738: 2737: 2733: 2732: 2731: 2729: 2728: 2727: 2644: 2237:French Canadian 2172: 2123:appropriate use 2045:It follows the 1858: 1817:This review is 1809: 1781: 1753: 1723: 1711: 1692: 1673: 1642: 1619: 1615: 1610: 1597: 1508: 1503: 1498: 1466: 1461: 1456: 1391:DavidLeighEllis 1365: 1351: 1314: 1306: 1279: 1239: 1232: 1214: 1201: 1069: 1042: 974: 937:would have not. 638:by mid-October. 463: 129:Heritage Canada 77: 64: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2736: 2734: 2726: 2725: 2724: 2723: 2706: 2705: 2704: 2703: 2643: 2640: 2639: 2638: 2637: 2636: 2635: 2634: 2633: 2632: 2631: 2630: 2629: 2628: 2627: 2626: 2625: 2624: 2567: 2566: 2565: 2564: 2563: 2562: 2561: 2560: 2559: 2558: 2535: 2534: 2533: 2532: 2531: 2530: 2529: 2528: 2507: 2506: 2505: 2504: 2503: 2502: 2483: 2482: 2481: 2480: 2463: 2462: 2447: 2446: 2437: 2436: 2432: 2431: 2424: 2423: 2419: 2418: 2412: 2411: 2407: 2406: 2400: 2399: 2395: 2394: 2388: 2387: 2383: 2382: 2370:More later. -- 2368: 2367: 2366: 2358: 2357: 2356: 2347: 2346: 2342: 2341: 2340: 2339: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2295: 2294: 2290: 2289: 2288: 2287: 2281: 2280: 2279: 2271: 2270: 2269: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2251: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2247: 2231: 2230: 2226: 2225: 2221: 2220: 2216: 2215: 2201: 2171: 2168: 2167: 2166: 2165: 2164: 2163: 2162: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2094: 2093: 2092: 2091: 2090: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2040: 2039: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1997: 1996: 1968:(citations to 1937: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1933: 1877: 1876: 1857: 1854: 1852: 1828: 1827: 1811: 1810: 1808: 1807: 1802: 1797: 1791: 1788: 1787: 1783: 1782: 1780: 1779: 1777:External links 1774: 1769: 1763: 1760: 1759: 1752: 1749: 1710: 1707: 1691: 1688: 1672: 1671:Recent changes 1669: 1641: 1638: 1614: 1611: 1609: 1608: 1594:requested move 1588: 1587: 1563: 1562: 1561: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1473: 1449: 1402: 1377: 1376: 1362:requested move 1356: 1353: 1352: 1340: 1339: 1335: 1318: 1305: 1304:Requested move 1302: 1278: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1246:129.70.134.105 1231: 1228: 1200: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1109: 1108: 1068: 1065: 1041: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1023:216.239.83.200 1005:Toddsschneider 978:Toddsschneider 973: 970: 969: 968: 967: 966: 954: 953: 940: 939: 928: 927: 917: 916: 915: 914: 902: 901: 894: 893: 892: 891: 875: 874: 873: 872: 860: 859: 839: 838: 825: 824: 823: 822: 821: 820: 819: 818: 817: 816: 797: 796: 795: 794: 793: 792: 791: 790: 789: 788: 775: 774: 773: 772: 771: 770: 757: 756: 755: 754: 753: 752: 751: 750: 749: 748: 725: 724: 723: 722: 721: 720: 719: 718: 717: 716: 703: 702: 701: 700: 699: 698: 697: 696: 680: 679: 678: 677: 676: 675: 660: 659: 658: 657: 656: 655: 646: 645: 644: 643: 642: 641: 623: 622: 621: 620: 619: 618: 610: 609: 608: 607: 595: 594: 587: 586: 585: 584: 572: 571: 561: 560: 553: 552: 540: 539: 538: 537: 525: 524: 518: 517: 510: 509: 498: 497: 496: 495: 482: 481: 462: 459: 458: 457: 447: 446: 442: 441: 436: 435: 430: 429: 424: 423: 419: 418: 406: 405: 404: 403: 388: 387: 386: 385: 370: 369: 359: 358: 349: 348: 344: 343: 335: 334: 322: 321: 320: 319: 318: 317: 303: 302: 301: 300: 283: 282: 281: 280: 279: 278: 270: 269: 268: 267: 261: 260: 259: 258: 252: 251: 250: 249: 243: 242: 241: 240: 233: 225: 224: 215: 214: 210: 209: 193: 192: 183: 172: 171: 159:Pierre O'Neill 151: 150: 111:Normand Lester 103: 102: 76: 73: 70: 69: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2735: 2722: 2718: 2714: 2710: 2709: 2708: 2707: 2702: 2698: 2697: 2696: 2695: 2694: 2692: 2688: 2684: 2680: 2673: 2670: 2669: 2665: 2662: 2658: 2655: 2651: 2647: 2641: 2623: 2619: 2615: 2611: 2610: 2609: 2605: 2601: 2597: 2596: 2595: 2591: 2587: 2583: 2579: 2578: 2577: 2576: 2575: 2574: 2573: 2572: 2571: 2570: 2569: 2568: 2557: 2553: 2549: 2545: 2544: 2543: 2542: 2541: 2540: 2539: 2538: 2537: 2536: 2527: 2523: 2519: 2515: 2514: 2513: 2512: 2511: 2510: 2509: 2508: 2501: 2497: 2493: 2489: 2488: 2487: 2486: 2485: 2484: 2479: 2475: 2471: 2467: 2466: 2465: 2464: 2461: 2457: 2453: 2449: 2448: 2444: 2443: 2442: 2441: 2434: 2433: 2430: 2426: 2425: 2421: 2420: 2417: 2414: 2413: 2409: 2408: 2405: 2402: 2401: 2397: 2396: 2393: 2390: 2389: 2385: 2384: 2381: 2377: 2373: 2369: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2359: 2354: 2353: 2352: 2349: 2348: 2344: 2343: 2337: 2336: 2334: 2328: 2324: 2320: 2316: 2315: 2314: 2310: 2306: 2302: 2301: 2300: 2297: 2296: 2292: 2291: 2285: 2284: 2282: 2277: 2276: 2275: 2272: 2267: 2266: 2265: 2262: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2252: 2245: 2244: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2238: 2233: 2232: 2228: 2227: 2223: 2222: 2218: 2217: 2214: 2210: 2206: 2202: 2200: 2196: 2192: 2188: 2187: 2186: 2185: 2181: 2177: 2169: 2161: 2160: 2153: 2150: 2149: 2147: 2144: 2138: 2137: 2130: 2128: 2124: 2112: 2110: 2104: 2103: 2101: 2100: 2095: 2089: 2088: 2081: 2078: 2077: 2075: 2071: 2065: 2064: 2057: 2054: 2053: 2051: 2049: 2044: 2038: 2037: 2030: 2028: 2016: 2014: 2013:major aspects 2008: 2007: 2005: 2001: 1995: 1994: 1987: 1985: 1973: 1971: 1959: 1957: 1951: 1950: 1948: 1947: 1942: 1938: 1932: 1931: 1924: 1922: 1918: 1914: 1910: 1906: 1902: 1890: 1886: 1885: 1883: 1879: 1878: 1874: 1870: 1866: 1864: 1860: 1859: 1855: 1853: 1850: 1849: 1845: 1842: 1839: 1835: 1832: 1826: 1824: 1820: 1815: 1814: 1806: 1803: 1801: 1798: 1796: 1793: 1792: 1790: 1789: 1784: 1778: 1775: 1773: 1770: 1768: 1765: 1764: 1762: 1761: 1756: 1750: 1748: 1747: 1743: 1739: 1734: 1731: 1727: 1720: 1717: 1714: 1708: 1706: 1705: 1701: 1697: 1689: 1687: 1686: 1682: 1678: 1670: 1668: 1667: 1663: 1659: 1654: 1651: 1648: 1645: 1639: 1637: 1635: 1631: 1627: 1623: 1612: 1607: 1605: 1600: 1595: 1590: 1589: 1586: 1582: 1578: 1575: 1573: 1567: 1564: 1560: 1556: 1552: 1548: 1544: 1540: 1539:Indefatigable 1536: 1535: 1534: 1530: 1526: 1525:Indefatigable 1521: 1518: 1514: 1511: 1506: 1501: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1489: 1485: 1481: 1477: 1474: 1472: 1469: 1464: 1459: 1453: 1450: 1448: 1444: 1440: 1436: 1432: 1428: 1424: 1420: 1416: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1406: 1401: 1400: 1396: 1392: 1387: 1382: 1375: 1373: 1368: 1363: 1358: 1357: 1350: 1346: 1343: 1338: 1334: 1332: 1328: 1324: 1319: 1312: 1311: 1308: 1303: 1301: 1300: 1296: 1292: 1289:. Regards.-- 1288: 1284: 1276: 1270: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1257: 1255: 1251: 1247: 1243: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1229: 1227: 1226: 1222: 1218: 1217: 1209: 1207: 1198: 1186: 1182: 1178: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1139: 1136: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1121: 1118: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1107: 1104: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1093: 1092: 1089: 1085: 1079: 1077: 1072: 1066: 1064: 1062: 1058: 1054: 1050: 1039: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1020: 1014: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1009: 1006: 1001: 999: 996: 993: 990: 988: 983: 982: 979: 971: 965: 962: 958: 957: 956: 955: 952: 951: 948: 942: 941: 938: 934: 933: 932: 926: 923: 922: 921: 913: 910: 906: 905: 904: 903: 900: 896: 895: 890: 887: 883: 879: 878: 877: 876: 871: 868: 864: 863: 862: 861: 858: 857:really means. 854: 853: 852: 848: 844: 843: 837: 836: 833: 827: 826: 815: 812: 807: 806: 805: 804: 803: 802: 801: 800: 799: 798: 785: 784: 783: 782: 781: 780: 779: 778: 777: 776: 768: 763: 762: 761: 760: 759: 758: 746: 745:Sergio Marchi 743: 739: 735: 734: 733: 732: 731: 730: 729: 728: 727: 726: 713: 712: 711: 710: 709: 708: 707: 706: 705: 704: 695: 692: 688: 687: 686: 685: 684: 683: 682: 681: 674: 671: 666: 665: 664: 663: 662: 661: 652: 651: 650: 649: 648: 647: 639: 636: 629: 628: 627: 626: 625: 624: 616: 615: 614: 613: 612: 611: 606: 603: 599: 598: 597: 596: 593: 589: 588: 583: 580: 576: 575: 574: 573: 570: 567: 566: 565: 559: 555: 554: 551: 548: 547: 546: 543: 536: 533: 529: 528: 527: 526: 523: 520: 519: 516: 512: 511: 508: 504: 503: 502: 494: 491: 486: 485: 484: 483: 480: 476: 475: 474: 470: 466: 456: 453: 449: 448: 444: 443: 438: 437: 432: 431: 426: 425: 421: 420: 416: 412: 408: 407: 401: 397: 393: 392: 390: 389: 383: 379: 375: 374: 372: 371: 366: 362: 361: 356: 352: 351: 346: 345: 341: 337: 336: 332: 328: 324: 323: 316: 313: 309: 308: 307: 306: 305: 304: 299: 296: 291: 287: 286: 285: 284: 276: 275: 274: 273: 272: 271: 265: 264: 263: 262: 256: 255: 254: 253: 247: 246: 245: 244: 238: 234: 231: 230: 228: 227: 222: 218: 217: 212: 211: 207: 203: 199: 195: 194: 190: 186: 185: 184: 181: 180: 177: 169: 168: 164: 163: 162: 160: 156: 148: 145: 144: 143: 140: 138: 134: 130: 125: 120: 118: 117: 112: 108: 101: 98: 97: 96: 94: 90: 86: 85:Option Canada 82: 74: 67: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 2677:— Preceding 2674: 2671: 2666: 2663: 2659: 2656: 2652: 2648: 2645: 2439: 2438: 2427: 2422:Negotiations 2415: 2403: 2391: 2386:Participants 2360: 2350: 2298: 2273: 2263: 2253: 2246:That's fine. 2234: 2173: 2151: 2145: 2120: 2106: 2097: 2079: 2073: 2055: 2046: 2024: 2010: 2003: 1981: 1967: 1953: 1944: 1940: 1898: 1888: 1881: 1861: 1851: 1840: 1830: 1829: 1816: 1805:Instructions 1735: 1732: 1721: 1718: 1715: 1712: 1693: 1674: 1655: 1652: 1649: 1646: 1643: 1626:142.83.68.58 1620:— Preceding 1616: 1598: 1591: 1571: 1569: 1565: 1542: 1541:, Knowledge 1519: 1479: 1475: 1451: 1414: 1403: 1380: 1378: 1366: 1359: 1341: 1336: 1320: 1307: 1280: 1233: 1212: 1203: 1202: 1094: 1080: 1073: 1070: 1043: 1002: 1000: 997: 994: 991: 984: 975: 943: 935: 929: 924: 918: 897: 881: 855: 849: 845: 841: 840: 828: 765: 634: 631: 590: 568: 562: 556: 549: 544: 541: 521: 513: 505: 499: 477: 471: 467: 464: 414: 410: 399: 395: 381: 377: 354: 339: 330: 326: 289: 236: 220: 188: 182: 173: 166: 152: 141: 123: 121: 114: 107:Radio-Canada 104: 89:Claude Arpin 78: 65: 43: 37: 2683:69.70.65.90 2398:Unity Rally 2338:in progress 2286:in progress 1913:word choice 1819:transcluded 1604:move review 1372:move review 1345:current log 1291:Skeezix1000 1240:—Preceding 1047:—Preceding 1017:—Preceding 109:journalist 36:This is an 2229:Background 1946:verifiable 1772:Authorship 1758:GA toolbox 1478:rename to 1349:target log 1053:74.12.11.3 738:confronted 450:Cheers! -- 2614:Coemgenus 2586:Coemgenus 2518:Coemgenus 2452:Coemgenus 2372:Coemgenus 2319:Coemgenus 2205:Coemgenus 2191:Coemgenus 2176:Coemgenus 2152:Pass/Fail 1856:Checklist 1834:Coemgenus 1831:Reviewer: 1795:Templates 1786:Reviewing 1751:GA Review 1103:Mathieugp 1088:Mathieugp 961:Mathieugp 947:Willmolls 909:Mathieugp 886:Willmolls 867:Mathieugp 832:Willmolls 811:Willmolls 715:violated. 691:Mathieugp 670:Willmolls 602:Mathieugp 579:Mathieugp 532:Mathieugp 490:Mathieugp 452:Willmolls 312:Willmolls 295:Mathieugp 290:Le Devoir 189:Le Devoir 176:Mathieugp 155:Le Devoir 66:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 2679:unsigned 2170:Comments 1844:contribs 1800:Criteria 1622:unsigned 1242:unsigned 1213:Bsimmons 1049:unsigned 1019:unsigned 899:Quebec). 365:Dr. Math 2365:will do 2293:Prelude 2146:Overall 2027:focused 1917:fiction 1726:Bearcat 1577:Rjensen 1551:Kndimov 1484:Kndimov 1452:Support 1415:Support 1261:AngusCA 1177:Sigma-6 1135:Sigma-6 1117:Sigma-6 237:127 998 200:, from 105:Later, 39:archive 2713:Knoper 2600:Knoper 2582:Knoper 2548:Dekk01 2492:Dekk01 2470:Knoper 2410:Result 2305:Knoper 2099:images 2074:stable 2072:It is 2050:policy 2002:It is 1939:It is 1919:, and 1909:layout 1880:It is 1865:review 1738:Knoper 1696:Knoper 1677:Dekk01 1658:Knoper 1566:Oppose 1545:has a 1520:Oppose 1499:Number 1476:Oppose 1457:Number 1342:Links: 1199:Notice 882:really 440:wrong. 378:Quebec 331:larger 2125:with 1921:lists 1867:(see 1821:from 740:then 327:still 16:< 2717:talk 2687:talk 2618:talk 2604:talk 2590:talk 2584:? -- 2552:talk 2522:talk 2496:talk 2474:talk 2456:talk 2376:talk 2355:done 2323:talk 2309:talk 2278:done 2268:done 2219:Lede 2209:talk 2195:talk 2180:talk 1943:and 1905:lead 1903:for 1873:here 1869:here 1838:talk 1742:talk 1722:-Re 1700:talk 1681:talk 1662:talk 1630:talk 1581:talk 1555:talk 1543:does 1529:talk 1488:talk 1443:talk 1395:talk 1295:talk 1265:talk 1250:talk 1221:talk 1181:talk 1057:talk 1027:talk 558:32%. 415:1992 206:1995 204:and 202:1993 133:RCMP 1901:MoS 1596:. 1329:to 1325:be 1223:) 1215:666 1067:POV 507:up? 411:81% 400:83% 394:In 382:84% 376:In 368:=D. 355:87% 340:50% 2719:) 2689:) 2620:) 2606:) 2592:) 2554:) 2524:) 2498:) 2476:) 2458:) 2378:) 2325:) 2311:) 2211:) 2197:) 2182:) 2154:: 2148:: 2131:: 2119:b 2113:: 2105:a 2082:: 2076:. 2058:: 2052:. 2031:: 2023:b 2017:: 2009:a 2006:. 1988:: 1984:OR 1980:c 1974:: 1966:b 1960:: 1952:a 1949:. 1925:: 1915:, 1911:, 1907:, 1897:b 1891:: 1887:a 1884:. 1863:GA 1846:) 1744:) 1702:) 1683:) 1664:) 1632:) 1583:) 1574:." 1557:) 1531:) 1490:) 1445:) 1437:. 1429:, 1425:, 1421:, 1407:→ 1397:) 1364:. 1347:• 1297:) 1267:) 1252:) 1183:) 1059:) 1029:) 830:-- 2715:( 2685:( 2616:( 2602:( 2588:( 2550:( 2520:( 2494:( 2472:( 2454:( 2374:( 2321:( 2307:( 2207:( 2193:( 2178:( 2129:) 2121:( 2111:) 2029:) 2025:( 2015:) 2011:( 1986:) 1982:( 1972:) 1958:) 1954:( 1923:) 1899:( 1841:· 1836:( 1740:( 1728:: 1724:@ 1698:( 1679:( 1660:( 1628:( 1579:( 1553:( 1527:( 1509:7 1504:5 1486:( 1467:7 1462:5 1441:( 1393:( 1388:) 1384:( 1333:. 1293:( 1263:( 1248:( 1219:( 1208:. 1179:( 1055:( 1025:( 239:. 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index