310:
506:
442:
424:
376:
627:
548:
396:
300:
269:
207:
1043:
second in "Participants", and others. This makes it hard to verify multiple sections of the article. If I was assessing this article at GAN today, I would not pass it. I think most of the inline citations can be added from the sources that are already used in the article. Knoper (or someone else) are you interested in looking at the sources and adding the missing inline citations?
238:
914:
add the necessary references, and review the article for prose concerns. While improvements have been made, this article still needs some work to retain its GA status and I hope you or someone is willing to make those edits. I'll keep this review open for a week, but if no edits are made, I'll close this as a delist.
913:
as a basis for what an article needs in order to be a GA, then decide if the article would meet those criteria if it was reviewed today. My role as a reviewer is to give comments about how the article can be improved upon. Unfortunately, I do not have the time at the moment to look for new sources,
1042:
Sorry for the delayed response. This article has undergone improvements since the original assessment, but I am still concerned at the sourcing, with multiple paragraphs missing inline citations such as the first, third, fifth, and sixth paragraphs in "Background", second in "Prelude", first and
865:
I cited the paragraph you referred to that required cites out of irrational personal attachment to the article after putting a lot of work into it 8 years ago, your tone and vague requests are a clear reminder why I left the project except for tinkering. Do whatever you want, have fun.
1057:
For me, the issue is that with the content that does not have a cited source, it's not clear where I can verify the information. While inline citations are not required, it should be obvious to the reader where each bit of information can be verified to meet the GA criteria.
850:
There are still some missing citations: every paragraph should have a citation at the end, minimum, to help with verifying the information. The
Background section is particularily missing these citations. There's also a couple of "citation needed" templates throughout.
1083:: could you close? I think the article should be delisted as there is no distinction between further reading and general references. General references are technically allowed (but de facto we're moving away from this), but the article doesn't even do that clearly.
687:
I really wanted to see this on the site, so I've put up the raw data. I'll look into improving things later on but I thought it was important to get this much up now. I'm looking for any help I can get on arguments for/against, general attitudes, and build-up. --
770:
Hi there, I did a lot of work on the original...cites should be very easy for most of the items, I can make an effort to do so this week. Are there any more substantive concerns with the article's content that would warrant removal from the standard?
895:, and to add more construction to my criticism, I'd recommend taking a collaborationist approach if you have an issue with an article and recommending a clear course of action instead of giving evolving commands dependent on vague criteria.
908:
I am sorry about the quality of my comments. When I give initial reviews, I try to point out the larger problems that I see in the article, and commit to a more thorough review if someone resolves the larger issues. I use the
960:
Maybe the right question is "should it be" delisted? Aside from an arbitrary statement that "Every paragraph should have a citation at the end", I haven't seen any clear statement that would indicate it should be delisted.
153:
807:
OK, should be easily resolved, most of the events cited are fairly common knowledge and not in dispute. Would be a bit sad for an article that a lot of work went into to lose status over a few paragraphs of citations.
792:
My biggest concern was the lack of citations. Since finding (or not finding) sources might change the article, I will wait until this is resolved before doing a closer evaluation. Please ping me once this is complete.
614:
1123:
It is true that the slogan of the "No" campaign signs translates to "we are right to say 'No'", but that is not the official translation that the "No" campaign used. I tried to put in the
1192:
1177:
706:
I am closing this as a "Keep" because of the lack of consensus on this page. Afterwards, I am going to list this for community discussion to get more opinions on this article at
147:
1187:
517:
755:, due to large sections of the article that are not cited. The aftermath section contains an "additional citations needed" banner since 2017, which needs to be resolved.
198:
1157:
356:
1172:
467:
449:
429:
44:
887:
So as not to appear unconstructive, if you're looking for an editor who added some interesting sections on this work to have a second set of eyes, I'd recommend
405:
283:
79:
1167:
1152:
366:
1182:
194:
190:
85:
532:
527:
168:
332:
135:
1162:
637:
1197:
743:
659:
655:
651:
647:
595:
576:
523:
99:
30:
643:
104:
20:
731:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1114:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
74:
1063:
1000:
951:
385:
323:
279:
274:
249:
129:
65:
206:
185:
125:
1124:
995:
does not reply by 16 January, I will manually close this GAR with "no consensus to delist", or something similar.
505:
217:
175:
1033:
996:
947:
109:
522:, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the
739:
24:
1088:
255:
626:
547:
1132:
237:
141:
161:
55:
987:. However, this is an individual reassessment (a process which will hopefully be removed soon per
331:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
222:
70:
453:, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to
51:
1084:
1059:
1014:
988:
966:
871:
834:
813:
776:
461:
219:
1129:
1048:
919:
856:
798:
760:
715:
910:
752:
441:
423:
1146:
1127:, but it was reverted. Did the reverter do this simply because it was unsourced? --
707:
315:
890:
689:
1138:
1092:
1074:
1052:
1018:
1004:
970:
955:
923:
896:
875:
860:
838:
817:
802:
780:
764:
719:
395:
375:
221:
746:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.
1068:
1037:
1010:
984:
962:
903:
867:
845:
830:
809:
787:
772:
1080:
1044:
992:
943:
915:
882:
852:
824:
794:
756:
711:
305:
299:
268:
465:
and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit
631:
455:
328:
991:) and so the decision must be left to the nominating editor. If
231:
223:
15:
526:. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be
394:
374:
607:
588:
569:
160:
751:
I am concerned that this article no longer meets the
630:
Facts from this article were featured on
Knowledge's
536:
of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
327:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
477:Knowledge:WikiProject Elections and Referendums
1193:WikiProject Elections and Referendums articles
1178:High-importance Governments of Canada articles
946:, do you wish to keep or delist this article?
480:Template:WikiProject Elections and Referendums
174:
8:
1188:B-Class Elections and Referendums articles
541:
500:
418:
263:
518:Social sciences and society good articles
1158:High-importance Canada-related articles
420:
265:
235:
1173:B-Class Governments of Canada articles
450:WikiProject Elections and Referendums
7:
1009:Thank you, appreciate the response.
727:The following discussion is closed.
447:This article is within the scope of
321:This article is within the scope of
254:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
483:Elections and Referendums articles
14:
406:WikiProject Governments of Canada
1110:The discussion above is closed.
625:
546:
504:
440:
422:
308:
298:
267:
236:
205:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
1168:High-importance Quebec articles
1153:B-Class Canada-related articles
744:Talk:1995 Quebec referendum/GA2
361:This article has been rated as
983:Personally, I agree with you,
1:
403:This article is supported by
383:This article is supported by
335:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
1183:All WikiProject Canada pages
1093:10:51, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
1075:21:50, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
1053:15:53, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
1019:02:07, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
1005:01:52, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
971:00:23, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
924:01:43, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
897:01:18, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
876:00:06, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
861:23:48, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
839:23:43, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
818:00:50, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
803:00:46, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
781:23:59, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
765:23:12, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
720:14:42, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
341:Knowledge:WikiProject Canada
956:19:14, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
344:Template:WikiProject Canada
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
1214:
1119:Translation of "No" slogan
530:. Editors may also seek a
367:project's importance scale
692:22:28, Jan 8, 2004 (UTC)
666:
624:
615:Good article reassessment
596:Good article reassessment
544:
540:
474:Elections and Referendums
435:
430:Elections and Referendums
402:
382:
360:
293:
262:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
1112:Please do not modify it.
729:Please do not modify it.
1163:B-Class Quebec articles
1139:22:46, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
347:Canada-related articles
1198:Delisted good articles
512:1995 Quebec referendum
399:
379:
244:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
25:1995 Quebec referendum
997:~~ AirshipJungleman29
948:~~ AirshipJungleman29
669:Delisted good article
524:good article criteria
398:
378:
199:Auto-archiving period
100:Neutral point of view
1125:official translation
577:Good article nominee
105:No original research
738:This discussion is
1034:AirshipJungleman29
730:
552:Article milestones
400:
386:WikiProject Quebec
380:
324:WikiProject Canada
250:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
728:
678:
677:
674:
673:
608:February 15, 2023
499:
498:
495:
494:
491:
490:
417:
416:
413:
412:
230:
229:
66:Assume good faith
43:
1205:
1137:
1071:
1041:
907:
894:
886:
849:
828:
791:
667:Current status:
660:October 30, 2015
656:October 30, 2011
652:October 30, 2010
648:October 30, 2009
644:October 30, 2004
629:
610:
591:
589:February 8, 2023
572:
551:
550:
542:
508:
501:
485:
484:
481:
478:
475:
468:our project page
462:electoral reform
444:
437:
436:
426:
419:
349:
348:
345:
342:
339:
318:
313:
312:
311:
302:
295:
294:
289:
286:
271:
264:
247:
241:
240:
232:
224:
210:
209:
200:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
1213:
1212:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1143:
1142:
1128:
1121:
1116:
1115:
1069:
1031:
901:
888:
880:
843:
822:
785:
733:
724:
723:
722:
701:
699:GA Reassessment
685:
606:
587:
570:August 25, 2015
568:
545:
514:was one of the
482:
479:
476:
473:
472:
363:High-importance
346:
343:
340:
337:
336:
314:
309:
307:
288:High‑importance
287:
277:
248:on Knowledge's
245:
226:
225:
220:
197:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
1211:
1209:
1201:
1200:
1195:
1190:
1185:
1180:
1175:
1170:
1165:
1160:
1155:
1145:
1144:
1120:
1117:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1098:
1097:
1096:
1095:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1021:
976:
975:
974:
973:
939:
938:
937:
936:
935:
934:
933:
932:
931:
930:
929:
928:
927:
926:
878:
749:
748:
734:
725:
705:
704:
703:
702:
700:
697:
695:
684:
681:
676:
675:
672:
671:
664:
663:
638:On this day...
622:
621:
618:
611:
603:
602:
599:
592:
584:
583:
580:
573:
565:
564:
561:
558:
554:
553:
538:
537:
509:
497:
496:
493:
492:
489:
488:
486:
445:
433:
432:
427:
415:
414:
411:
410:
401:
391:
390:
381:
371:
370:
359:
353:
352:
350:
333:the discussion
320:
319:
303:
291:
290:
272:
260:
259:
253:
242:
228:
227:
218:
216:
215:
212:
211:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1210:
1199:
1196:
1194:
1191:
1189:
1186:
1184:
1181:
1179:
1176:
1174:
1171:
1169:
1166:
1164:
1161:
1159:
1156:
1154:
1151:
1150:
1148:
1141:
1140:
1136:
1135:
1131:
1126:
1118:
1113:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1073:
1072:
1065:
1061:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1050:
1046:
1039:
1035:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1020:
1016:
1012:
1008:
1007:
1006:
1002:
998:
994:
990:
986:
982:
981:
980:
979:
978:
977:
972:
968:
964:
959:
958:
957:
953:
949:
945:
941:
940:
925:
921:
917:
912:
905:
900:
899:
898:
892:
884:
879:
877:
873:
869:
864:
863:
862:
858:
854:
847:
842:
841:
840:
836:
832:
826:
821:
820:
819:
815:
811:
806:
805:
804:
800:
796:
789:
784:
783:
782:
778:
774:
769:
768:
767:
766:
762:
758:
754:
747:
745:
741:
736:
735:
732:
721:
717:
713:
709:
698:
696:
693:
691:
682:
680:
670:
665:
661:
657:
653:
649:
645:
641:
639:
633:
628:
623:
619:
617:
616:
612:
609:
605:
604:
600:
598:
597:
593:
590:
586:
585:
581:
579:
578:
574:
571:
567:
566:
562:
559:
556:
555:
549:
543:
539:
535:
534:
529:
525:
521:
520:
519:
513:
510:
507:
503:
502:
487:
470:
469:
464:
463:
458:
457:
452:
451:
446:
443:
439:
438:
434:
431:
428:
425:
421:
408:
407:
397:
393:
392:
388:
387:
377:
373:
372:
368:
364:
358:
355:
354:
351:
334:
330:
326:
325:
317:
316:Canada portal
306:
304:
301:
297:
296:
292:
285:
281:
276:
273:
270:
266:
261:
257:
251:
243:
239:
234:
233:
214:
213:
208:
204:
196:
192:
189:
187:
183:
182:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1133:
1122:
1111:
1067:
750:
737:
726:
694:
686:
679:
668:
635:
613:
594:
575:
533:reassessment
531:
516:
515:
511:
466:
460:
454:
448:
404:
384:
362:
322:
256:WikiProjects
202:
184:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
1085:Femke (alt)
911:GA criteria
753:GA criteria
740:transcluded
528:renominated
284:Governments
148:free images
31:not a forum
1147:Categories
642:column on
989:WP:GAPD23
632:Main Page
456:elections
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
1130:Denelson
683:Comments
620:Delisted
186:Archives
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
891:Bearcat
829:Voila.
690:Matty j
634:in the
560:Process
365:on the
246:B-class
203:50 days
154:WP refs
142:scholar
1070:buidhe
1038:Knoper
1011:Knoper
985:Knoper
963:Knoper
904:Knoper
868:Knoper
846:Knoper
831:Knoper
810:Knoper
788:Knoper
773:Knoper
708:WP:GAR
658:, and
582:Listed
563:Result
338:Canada
329:Canada
280:Quebec
275:Canada
252:scale.
126:Google
1081:Z1720
1045:Z1720
993:Z1720
944:Z1720
916:Z1720
883:Z1720
853:Z1720
825:Z1720
795:Z1720
757:Z1720
742:from
712:Z1720
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
1089:talk
1049:talk
1036:and
1015:talk
1001:talk
967:talk
952:talk
920:talk
872:talk
857:talk
835:talk
814:talk
799:talk
777:talk
761:talk
716:talk
601:Kept
557:Date
357:High
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
942:Hi
176:TWL
1149::
1134:83
1091:)
1066:)
1062:·
1051:)
1017:)
1003:)
969:)
954:)
922:)
874:)
859:)
837:)
816:)
801:)
779:)
763:)
718:)
710:.
654:,
650:,
646:,
459:,
282:/
278::
201::
193:,
156:)
54:;
1087:(
1079:@
1064:c
1060:t
1058:(
1047:(
1040::
1032:@
1013:(
999:(
965:(
950:(
918:(
906::
902:@
893::
889:@
885::
881:@
870:(
855:(
848::
844:@
833:(
827::
823:@
812:(
797:(
790::
786:@
775:(
759:(
714:(
662:.
640:"
636:"
471:.
409:.
389:.
369:.
258::
195:2
191:1
188::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
