406:
second in "Participants", and others. This makes it hard to verify multiple sections of the article. If I was assessing this article at GAN today, I would not pass it. I think most of the inline citations can be added from the sources that are already used in the article. Knoper (or someone else) are you interested in looking at the sources and adding the missing inline citations?
277:
add the necessary references, and review the article for prose concerns. While improvements have been made, this article still needs some work to retain its GA status and I hope you or someone is willing to make those edits. I'll keep this review open for a week, but if no edits are made, I'll close this as a delist.
276:
as a basis for what an article needs in order to be a GA, then decide if the article would meet those criteria if it was reviewed today. My role as a reviewer is to give comments about how the article can be improved upon. Unfortunately, I do not have the time at the moment to look for new sources,
405:
Sorry for the delayed response. This article has undergone improvements since the original assessment, but I am still concerned at the sourcing, with multiple paragraphs missing inline citations such as the first, third, fifth, and sixth paragraphs in "Background", second in "Prelude", first and
228:
I cited the paragraph you referred to that required cites out of irrational personal attachment to the article after putting a lot of work into it 8 years ago, your tone and vague requests are a clear reminder why I left the project except for tinkering. Do whatever you want, have fun.
420:
For me, the issue is that with the content that does not have a cited source, it's not clear where I can verify the information. While inline citations are not required, it should be obvious to the reader where each bit of information can be verified to meet the GA criteria.
213:
There are still some missing citations: every paragraph should have a citation at the end, minimum, to help with verifying the information. The
Background section is particularily missing these citations. There's also a couple of "citation needed" templates throughout.
446:: could you close? I think the article should be delisted as there is no distinction between further reading and general references. General references are technically allowed (but de facto we're moving away from this), but the article doesn't even do that clearly.
133:
Hi there, I did a lot of work on the original...cites should be very easy for most of the items, I can make an effort to do so this week. Are there any more substantive concerns with the article's content that would warrant removal from the standard?
258:, and to add more construction to my criticism, I'd recommend taking a collaborationist approach if you have an issue with an article and recommending a clear course of action instead of giving evolving commands dependent on vague criteria.
271:
I am sorry about the quality of my comments. When I give initial reviews, I try to point out the larger problems that I see in the article, and commit to a more thorough review if someone resolves the larger issues. I use the
323:
Maybe the right question is "should it be" delisted? Aside from an arbitrary statement that "Every paragraph should have a citation at the end", I haven't seen any clear statement that would indicate it should be delisted.
170:
OK, should be easily resolved, most of the events cited are fairly common knowledge and not in dispute. Would be a bit sad for an article that a lot of work went into to lose status over a few paragraphs of citations.
155:
My biggest concern was the lack of citations. Since finding (or not finding) sources might change the article, I will wait until this is resolved before doing a closer evaluation. Please ping me once this is complete.
34:
I am closing this as a "Keep" because of the lack of consensus on this page. Afterwards, I am going to list this for community discussion to get more opinions on this article at
118:, due to large sections of the article that are not cited. The aftermath section contains an "additional citations needed" banner since 2017, which needs to be resolved.
99:
250:
So as not to appear unconstructive, if you're looking for an editor who added some interesting sections on this work to have a second set of eyes, I'd recommend
95:
80:
72:
59:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
477:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
426:
363:
314:
88:
17:
358:
does not reply by 16 January, I will manually close this GAR with "no consensus to delist", or something similar.
396:
359:
310:
65:
451:
350:. However, this is an individual reassessment (a process which will hopefully be removed soon per
447:
422:
377:
351:
329:
234:
197:
176:
139:
411:
282:
219:
161:
123:
43:
273:
115:
455:
437:
415:
381:
367:
333:
318:
286:
259:
238:
223:
201:
180:
165:
143:
127:
47:
35:
253:
431:
400:
373:
347:
325:
266:
230:
208:
193:
172:
150:
135:
443:
407:
355:
306:
278:
245:
215:
187:
157:
119:
39:
354:) and so the decision must be left to the nominating editor. If
107:
76:
114:
I am concerned that this article no longer meets the
309:, do you wish to keep or delist this article?
8:
7:
372:Thank you, appreciate the response.
55:The following discussion is closed.
24:
473:The discussion above is closed.
346:Personally, I agree with you,
1:
456:10:51, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
438:21:50, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
416:15:53, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
382:02:07, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
368:01:52, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
334:00:23, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
287:01:43, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
260:01:18, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
239:00:06, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
224:23:48, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
202:23:43, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
181:00:50, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
166:00:46, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
144:23:59, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
128:23:12, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
48:14:42, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
319:19:14, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
18:Talk:1995 Quebec referendum
492:
475:Please do not modify it.
57:Please do not modify it.
360:~~ AirshipJungleman29
311:~~ AirshipJungleman29
397:AirshipJungleman29
58:
56:
483:
434:
404:
270:
257:
249:
212:
191:
154:
112:
103:
84:
491:
490:
486:
485:
484:
482:
481:
480:
479:
478:
432:
394:
264:
251:
243:
206:
185:
148:
93:
70:
64:
61:
52:
51:
50:
29:
27:GA Reassessment
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
489:
487:
472:
471:
470:
469:
468:
467:
466:
465:
464:
463:
462:
461:
460:
459:
458:
387:
386:
385:
384:
339:
338:
337:
336:
302:
301:
300:
299:
298:
297:
296:
295:
294:
293:
292:
291:
290:
289:
241:
113:
62:
53:
33:
32:
31:
30:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
488:
476:
457:
453:
449:
445:
441:
440:
439:
436:
435:
428:
424:
419:
418:
417:
413:
409:
402:
398:
393:
392:
391:
390:
389:
388:
383:
379:
375:
371:
370:
369:
365:
361:
357:
353:
349:
345:
344:
343:
342:
341:
340:
335:
331:
327:
322:
321:
320:
316:
312:
308:
304:
303:
288:
284:
280:
275:
268:
263:
262:
261:
255:
247:
242:
240:
236:
232:
227:
226:
225:
221:
217:
210:
205:
204:
203:
199:
195:
189:
184:
183:
182:
178:
174:
169:
168:
167:
163:
159:
152:
147:
146:
145:
141:
137:
132:
131:
130:
129:
125:
121:
117:
111:
110:
106:
101:
97:
92:
91:
87:
82:
78:
74:
69:
68:
60:
49:
45:
41:
37:
26:
19:
474:
430:
108:
104:
90:Article talk
89:
85:
66:
63:
54:
448:Femke (alt)
274:GA criteria
116:GA criteria
77:visual edit
352:WP:GAPD23
254:Bearcat
192:Voila.
100:history
81:history
67:Article
433:buidhe
401:Knoper
374:Knoper
348:Knoper
326:Knoper
267:Knoper
231:Knoper
209:Knoper
194:Knoper
173:Knoper
151:Knoper
136:Knoper
36:WP:GAR
444:Z1720
408:Z1720
356:Z1720
307:Z1720
279:Z1720
246:Z1720
216:Z1720
188:Z1720
158:Z1720
120:Z1720
109:Watch
40:Z1720
16:<
452:talk
412:talk
399:and
378:talk
364:talk
330:talk
315:talk
283:talk
235:talk
220:talk
198:talk
177:talk
162:talk
140:talk
124:talk
96:edit
73:edit
44:talk
305:Hi
454:)
429:)
425:·
414:)
380:)
366:)
332:)
317:)
285:)
237:)
222:)
200:)
179:)
164:)
142:)
126:)
98:|
79:|
75:|
46:)
38:.
450:(
442:@
427:c
423:t
421:(
410:(
403::
395:@
376:(
362:(
328:(
313:(
281:(
269::
265:@
256::
252:@
248::
244:@
233:(
218:(
211::
207:@
196:(
190::
186:@
175:(
160:(
153::
149:@
138:(
122:(
105:·
102:)
94:(
86:·
83:)
71:(
42:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.