184:
50:
108:
81:
21:
118:
263:
I've added all possible outcomes for this group, separating them by the possible outcomes for the upcoming Togo/Switzerland game. I've commented out each section in the code so it becomes easy to delete the sections that no longer apply after the game has been completed. Hopefully this helps out the
332:
Should all tiebreaks be marked in the table used to summarise qualification scenarios? I think it makes sense to show outright winners/runner-ups on their own, but to show the ties separately, even if, in the case of a Korea/Switzerland draw, we know the outcome of the tie. The tiebreaks should be
311:
Togo 3-2 Switzerland (the only way to prepare Togo, Switzerland and Korea to draw level on goal difference, while still bringing
Switzerland's GS to one less than Korea, in preparation for Switzerland to defeat Korea by a margin of one goal, to leave the three teams tied on GD and
300:
Either of the two possible three-way ties (one remains possible if
Switzerland beat Togo, the other is possible if Togo beat Switzerland) will be resolved by criteria b (overall GD) or c (overall GS) unless the scores
282:. I'm going to wait until the Togo-Switzerland game is finished before going any further. The other 3-way scenario, which could happen following a Togo win over Switzerland, could also be examined.
31:
193:
91:
369:"France may qualify as either group winners or runners up, or be eliminated, after the consideration of tie-break scenarios, if they win and Korea and Switzerland draw."
460:
308:
Switzerland 3-2 Togo (required to bring
Switzerland level with Korea on GD and GS in preparation for a Korea-Switzerland draw to leave them tied on GD and GS).
455:
450:
373:
The clear refutations of the BBC's statement are the following examples, where France do indeed score two or more goals, but can still be eliminated:
174:
164:
465:
445:
234:
140:
131:
86:
355:
248:
61:
363:"If Switzerland draw with Korea and France score two or more goals, then both Switzerland and the French will qualify."
123:
27:
351:
279:
49:
67:
136:
20:
230:
221:
217:
379:
Lots will be drawn to determine whether France or Korea advances; loser of the draw is eliminated.
139:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
292:
And... just before the Togo-Switzerland game finishes, my calculations seem to indicate that:
243:
411:
401:
334:
319:
283:
183:
431:
414:
404:
337:
322:
286:
268:
253:
224:
439:
265:
426:
428:
238:
297:
A three-way tie only remains possible if the
Switzerland-Togo game is decisive
113:
264:
guy who usually does this... as I was completely bored today. (Obviously :P)
237:. When the WC is over, a statistic page also could be made, also as Euro 04.
216:
I'm proposing to delete the group articles since there is infor in the main
117:
107:
80:
396:
two or more goals, then both
Switzerland and the French will qualify.
43:
15:
233:
page. I think, that the results at that page should be as on
425:
The BBC is wrong as usual. The Swiss are partying up large.
410:
Dang! I should have got a screenshot. They've corrected it.
229:
Instead, I propose to remove some of the information at the
182:
400:
But as it stands, the BBC statement is clearly wrong.
318:
But it looks like it won't be 3-2 either way, anyway.
385:
Korea advances on goals scored, France is eliminated.
135:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
343:BBC get qualification scenario wrong for Group G!
278:One of the three-way tie scenarios is covered at
8:
421:Gruppensieger Schweizer Nati! Jaaaaaaaaaa!
392:If Switzerland draw with Korea and France
390:To be fair, the BBC probably meant to say
75:
47:
383:Togo 1-2 France; Switzerland 1-1 Korea -
377:Togo 1-2 France; Switzerland 0-0 Korea -
77:
347:And Knowledge get it right of course!
7:
461:WikiProject Football season articles
129:This article is within the scope of
456:Stub-Class football season articles
235:2004 European Football Championship
66:It is of interest to the following
14:
451:Low-importance football articles
116:
106:
79:
48:
19:
169:This article has been rated as
30:on 15 June 2006. The result of
26:This article was nominated for
356:Knowledge scenario for Group G
212:World Cup Group stage articles
149:Knowledge:WikiProject Football
1:
466:WikiProject Football articles
194:the season article task force
191:This article is supported by
152:Template:WikiProject Football
143:and see a list of open tasks.
446:Stub-Class football articles
333:dealt with in that section.
124:Association football portal
482:
175:project's importance scale
432:23:06, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
415:13:53, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
405:13:01, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
338:19:13, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
323:14:46, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
287:13:16, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
269:03:22, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
254:21:32, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
225:21:40, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
190:
168:
101:
74:
352:BBC scenario for Group G
280:User:Carcharoth/Group_G
274:Three-way tie scenarios
187:
56:This article is rated
186:
328:Summary of scenarios
137:Association football
132:WikiProject Football
259:Comprehensive Table
231:2006 FIFA World Cup
218:FIFA World Cup 2006
394:win by a margin of
188:
62:content assessment
209:
208:
205:
204:
201:
200:
155:football articles
42:
41:
473:
251:
246:
241:
157:
156:
153:
150:
147:
126:
121:
120:
110:
103:
102:
97:
94:
83:
76:
59:
53:
52:
44:
23:
16:
481:
480:
476:
475:
474:
472:
471:
470:
436:
435:
423:
354:and compare to
345:
330:
276:
261:
249:
244:
239:
214:
154:
151:
148:
145:
144:
122:
115:
95:
89:
60:on Knowledge's
57:
12:
11:
5:
479:
477:
469:
468:
463:
458:
453:
448:
438:
437:
422:
419:
418:
417:
388:
387:
381:
344:
341:
329:
326:
316:
315:
314:
313:
309:
303:
302:
298:
294:
293:
275:
272:
260:
257:
213:
210:
207:
206:
203:
202:
199:
198:
189:
179:
178:
171:Low-importance
167:
161:
160:
158:
141:the discussion
128:
127:
111:
99:
98:
96:Low‑importance
84:
72:
71:
65:
54:
40:
39:
32:the discussion
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
478:
467:
464:
462:
459:
457:
454:
452:
449:
447:
444:
443:
441:
434:
433:
430:
427:
420:
416:
413:
409:
408:
407:
406:
403:
398:
397:
395:
386:
382:
380:
376:
375:
374:
371:
370:
365:
364:
359:
357:
353:
348:
342:
340:
339:
336:
327:
325:
324:
321:
310:
307:
306:
305:
304:
299:
296:
295:
291:
290:
289:
288:
285:
281:
273:
271:
270:
267:
258:
256:
255:
252:
247:
242:
236:
232:
227:
226:
223:
219:
211:
196:
195:
185:
181:
180:
176:
172:
166:
163:
162:
159:
142:
138:
134:
133:
125:
119:
114:
112:
109:
105:
104:
100:
93:
88:
85:
82:
78:
73:
69:
63:
55:
51:
46:
45:
37:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
424:
399:
393:
391:
389:
384:
378:
372:
368:
366:
362:
360:
349:
346:
331:
317:
277:
262:
228:
215:
192:
170:
130:
68:WikiProjects
35:
367:Knowledge:
440:Categories
412:Carcharoth
402:Carcharoth
335:Carcharoth
320:Carcharoth
284:Carcharoth
58:Stub-class
220:article.
266:ScottNak
222:Kingjeff
146:Football
87:Football
38:(early).
28:deletion
173:on the
429:Wallie
92:Season
64:scale.
361:BBC:
350:See
312:GS).
301:are:
36:Keep
34:was
165:Low
442::
358:.
250:ha
245:la
240:ka
90::
197:.
177:.
70::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
