Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:2010 FIFA World Cup Group F

Source đź“ť

651:???? I will enlighten you -- relevance means the pertinence of an item to a given subject (ask yourself, "Are these two items connected?"). You should have said, "This is clearly relevant to Group F, but is this important enough to merit inclusion in an enyclopedia?" For example, if someone added the following statement, "Group F marks the first time that the adidas Jabulani ball was used in a match between Italy and Paraguay", then one would certainly understand its relevance to this article (it is inherently connected), but one would argue for its triviality. The fact that New Zealand was eliminated in this World Cup because of a 22: 74: 53: 84: 260:
FIFA only says 4-3-3 based on the official registered positions of the Starting XI players. In the actual match, Vicelich played in midfield. The referenced FIFA.com matchcast was shown prior to the start of the match, and doesn't reflect how NZL actually lined up. Also, I would like to mention that
210:
I've noticed at the start of this World Cup that the tactical diagrams of teams playing three man defences (like New Zealand today, and Mexico/Uruguay before) often seem to be neglected for 4-4-2. I remember Australia played a similar formation to New Zealand in 2006 (3-4-3/3-6-1), so couldn't their
601:
that New Zealand was the first team eliminated by the new 3-point system adopted by FIFA -- at the World Cup stage -- (and now most international and domestic competitions for soccer). So as not to avoid a continued spat, I have included the "citation needed" tag. I don't think this is necessary
614:
do not count as original research. I'm pretty sure that we can all look at past WC tables and add (2 points win-1 point draw) and compare that to (3 points win-1 point draw). Nevertheless, to satiate a particular user, I am bending over backwards to include the "citation needed" tag. As such, I
439:
Iaquinta also barely touched the ball on the wing. He was an out and out striker. I think it's better to remove the images instead of having incorrect information. Apparently FIFA doesnt mind having incorrect information, but this is an encyclopedia (a wiki, so not as high a standard, but an
394:
also shows NZ using 3-4-3. One other thing pointed out with the matchcast is that Fallon played in the middle of the three-pronged attack line with Smeltz on the left and Killen on the right. If PeeJay still disagrees with me, I suggest we mark this article as being in dispute.
570:
Why did somebody write a description of the match between Slovakia and Italy? More importantly, it reads that the Italians abused the Slovakian goal keeper because they were losing. That sort of presumptive writing is not tolerated on wikipedia.
731:
Hey guys. Take a look at group E in would cup 98. Belgium played 3 draws and was eliminated. So, New Zealand is not the first team being eliminated after going through the World Cup without defeats after the 3 point rule was introduced. -Maw
630:
But what difference does this "fact" make? Are you arguing for a return to the days of two-points-for-a-win? The number of points awarded for a win is a fact of football; the fact that that number has changed over time is irrelevant. –
491:
New Zealand's line-up is also wrong in their first game. They played a 5-2-3. Bertos and Lockhead are wingbacks playing wide, with Reid, Nelson, and Smith in the center of defense. Vicelich played in midfield alongside Elliott.
667:
without noting that it is the first time the tournament has been hosted by an African nation. Likewise, we cannot have an article about Group F without noting that this group play included the first elimination by the
282:
All of the line-up diagrams are based on the tactical line-ups provided by FIFA. It has been this way for a long time. The same method is used for UEFA matches where the tactical line-up images are provided. –
211:
diagram be used for this page? To say that New Zealand played 4-4-2 not only misrepresents the game, but also serves to generalise their tactical novelty which may be of interest to those using this Wiki.
686:
I completely disagree with your assessment of the encyclopaedic value of this "fact", but I will leave it for another user to give a third opinion on the subject before anyone takes any further action. –
140: 369:"we've always done it like this" is no argument. If there is a way to provide more accurate information, that shuold always take precedence on wikipedia. 780: 130: 466:
Slovakia's line-up is incorrect. Šesták played in attack alongside Vittek. Jendrišek was on the wing, and Hamšík played in the middle. Source:
190:
To the flags: I looked in the other groups and there were only flags besides the coaches if he was a foreign coach... So no need for this ones.
785: 775: 387: 106: 499: 477: 447: 342: 318: 268: 425: 557: 542: 517: 415:
Hi, there are two errors on Italy. Grosso and Panucci don't play !!! There were Criscito and Cannavaro instead. Please edit the image
396: 578: 178: 97: 58: 227: 615:
believe it is well within the bounds of reasonableness, given my patience with this user, to count future reverts as vandalism.
33: 467: 391: 240: 748: 525: 507: 485: 390:, and the "Tactical View" (as opposed to "Tactical Lineup") at each 15 minute interval of the official FIFA matchcast 89: 756: 305: 503: 481: 451: 333: 346: 322: 272: 309: 39: 21: 429: 386:
Actually, even FIFA descibe New Zealand's formation against Slovakia as being made of a three man defence at
561: 546: 521: 400: 388:
http://www.fifa.com/worldcup/awards/bestyoungplayer/news/newsid=1246140/index.html#smith+steady+weiss+shines
582: 574: 538: 495: 473: 443: 421: 338: 314: 264: 215: 166: 752: 669: 737: 300:
Direct quote from the coach Herbert saying prior to the match that he will use Vicelich in midfield at:
174: 105:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
699:
You are entitled to disagree. However, in the future, it might be helpful to produce an argument (see:
722: 677: 620: 223: 102: 733: 691: 664: 635: 361: 287: 717:
New Zealand was the first team eliminated by the three point rule -- (it's a fact, not a "fact")
374: 301: 440:
pseudo-encyclopedia nonetheless) and incorrect information should be avoided at all costs.
247: 195: 170: 607: 718: 673: 616: 468:
http://www.fifa.com/live/competitions/worldcup/matchday=5/day=1/match=300061483/index.html
392:
http://www.fifa.com/live/competitions/worldcup/matchday=5/day=1/match=300061483/index.html
219: 760: 741: 726: 694: 681: 638: 624: 586: 565: 550: 455: 433: 404: 378: 364: 350: 326: 290: 276: 251: 231: 199: 182: 707:) unless you have a legitimate basis for doing so with respect to the term in question. 688: 632: 358: 284: 769: 370: 416: 306:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/dominion-post/sport/3816107/Historic-result-for-All-Whites
243: 191: 334:
http://www.theroar.com.au/2010/06/16/we-should-learn-from-spirited-all-whites/
79: 162:
What flag will I put beside Vladimir Weiss if he was born in Czechslovakia?
310:
http://www.zonalmarking.net/2010/06/01/new-zealands-world-cup-2010-tactics/
83: 73: 52: 602:
given that "basic math" is a standard for not needing a citation ....
261:
New Zealand have played 3-4-3 for all matches since November 2009.
663:
material for an encyclopedia. We cannot have an article about the
593:
New Zealand first WC team eliminated based upon three point system
704: 655:
for awarding points does not constitute trivia. It isn't just
15: 302:
http://tvnz.co.nz/all-whites/herbert-opts-vicelich-3588302
535:
Are you missing a late (90+ ) substitution by Slovakia?
700: 597:
A user has reverted several of my edits concerning the
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 417:
http://en.wikipedia.org/File:ITA-PAR_2010-06-14.svg
332:Another link that describes the whole starting XI: 304:, report that NZ used a 3-4-3 against Slovakia: 610:). As per standard Knowledge (XXG) policies, 470:(look under "PITCH" and "Tactical line-up") 8: 703:) and refrain from using scare quotes (see: 461: 19: 556:Its there now... sorry for my impatience. 47: 308:, and demonstation of NZ's usual 3-4-3: 49: 462:Slovakia's line-up against New Zealand 7: 705:http://en.wikipedia.org/Scare_quotes 115:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Football 95:This article is within the scope of 38:It is of interest to the following 14: 647:Do you understand the concept of 781:Mid-importance football articles 701:http://en.wikipedia.org/Argument 357:Please read my above comment. – 82: 72: 51: 20: 531:Slovakia v. Italy substitutions 206:New Zealand/three man defences. 135:This article has been rated as 1: 786:WikiProject Football articles 776:Start-Class football articles 239:FIFA.com says 4-3-3/4-3-2-1: 118:Template:WikiProject Football 109:and see a list of open tasks. 749:1998 FIFA World Cup Group E 90:Association football portal 802: 141:project's importance scale 727:04:36, 12 July 2010 (UTC) 695:23:47, 11 July 2010 (UTC) 682:15:51, 11 July 2010 (UTC) 639:15:05, 11 July 2010 (UTC) 625:02:54, 11 July 2010 (UTC) 587:16:59, 24 June 2010 (UTC) 566:16:27, 24 June 2010 (UTC) 551:16:07, 24 June 2010 (UTC) 526:16:03, 19 June 2010 (UTC) 508:13:39, 20 June 2010 (UTC) 486:07:23, 20 June 2010 (UTC) 456:13:49, 20 June 2010 (UTC) 434:19:24, 19 June 2010 (UTC) 405:09:08, 17 June 2010 (UTC) 379:20:44, 16 June 2010 (UTC) 365:00:21, 16 June 2010 (UTC) 351:00:20, 16 June 2010 (UTC) 327:23:26, 15 June 2010 (UTC) 291:16:40, 15 June 2010 (UTC) 277:15:01, 15 June 2010 (UTC) 252:14:53, 15 June 2010 (UTC) 232:14:13, 15 June 2010 (UTC) 200:12:00, 15 June 2010 (UTC) 183:11:56, 15 June 2010 (UTC) 134: 67: 46: 761:01:47, 7 May 2012 (UTC) 742:09:26, 6 May 2012 (UTC) 670:Three points for a win 28:This article is rated 32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 103:Association football 98:WikiProject Football 665:2010 FIFA World Cup 612:simple calculations 34:content assessment 577:comment added by 541:comment added by 498:comment added by 476:comment added by 446:comment added by 424:comment added by 341:comment added by 317:comment added by 267:comment added by 235: 218:comment added by 186: 169:comment added by 155: 154: 151: 150: 147: 146: 121:football articles 793: 589: 553: 510: 488: 458: 436: 411:Italy - Paraguay 353: 329: 279: 234: 212: 185: 163: 123: 122: 119: 116: 113: 92: 87: 86: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 801: 800: 796: 795: 794: 792: 791: 790: 766: 765: 747:Confirmed. See 595: 572: 536: 533: 500:128.211.251.103 493: 478:128.211.251.103 471: 464: 448:128.211.251.103 441: 419: 413: 336: 312: 262: 213: 208: 164: 160: 120: 117: 114: 111: 110: 88: 81: 61: 29: 12: 11: 5: 799: 797: 789: 788: 783: 778: 768: 767: 764: 763: 753:Walter Görlitz 715: 714: 713: 712: 711: 710: 709: 708: 642: 641: 594: 591: 532: 529: 513: 463: 460: 412: 409: 384: 383: 382: 381: 343:219.88.197.181 319:219.88.197.181 298: 297: 296: 295: 294: 293: 269:219.88.197.181 255: 254: 207: 204: 203: 202: 159: 156: 153: 152: 149: 148: 145: 144: 137:Mid-importance 133: 127: 126: 124: 107:the discussion 94: 93: 77: 65: 64: 62:Mid‑importance 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 798: 787: 784: 782: 779: 777: 774: 773: 771: 762: 758: 754: 750: 746: 745: 744: 743: 739: 735: 729: 728: 724: 720: 706: 702: 698: 697: 696: 693: 690: 685: 684: 683: 679: 675: 671: 666: 662: 658: 654: 650: 646: 645: 644: 643: 640: 637: 634: 629: 628: 627: 626: 622: 618: 613: 609: 605: 600: 592: 590: 588: 584: 580: 576: 568: 567: 563: 559: 554: 552: 548: 544: 540: 530: 528: 527: 523: 519: 514: 511: 509: 505: 501: 497: 489: 487: 483: 479: 475: 469: 459: 457: 453: 449: 445: 437: 435: 431: 427: 426:93.149.73.157 423: 418: 410: 408: 406: 402: 398: 393: 389: 380: 376: 372: 368: 367: 366: 363: 360: 356: 355: 354: 352: 348: 344: 340: 335: 330: 328: 324: 320: 316: 311: 307: 303: 292: 289: 286: 281: 280: 278: 274: 270: 266: 259: 258: 257: 256: 253: 249: 245: 242: 238: 237: 236: 233: 229: 225: 221: 217: 205: 201: 197: 193: 189: 188: 187: 184: 180: 176: 172: 168: 157: 142: 138: 132: 129: 128: 125: 108: 104: 100: 99: 91: 85: 80: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 730: 716: 660: 656: 652: 648: 611: 603: 598: 596: 569: 558:207.7.180.42 555: 543:207.7.180.42 534: 518:93.149.73.50 515: 512: 490: 465: 438: 414: 397:219.89.29.44 385: 331: 299: 209: 161: 136: 96: 40:WikiProjects 653:rule change 579:85.3.73.135 573:—Preceding 537:—Preceding 494:—Preceding 472:—Preceding 442:—Preceding 420:—Preceding 337:—Preceding 313:—Preceding 263:—Preceding 214:—Preceding 171:ShaneMc2010 165:—Preceding 30:Start-class 770:Categories 719:Obamafan70 674:Obamafan70 617:Obamafan70 220:Thecomaboy 661:essential 657:important 649:relevance 734:Mawerick 575:unsigned 539:unsigned 496:unsigned 474:unsigned 444:unsigned 422:unsigned 339:unsigned 315:unsigned 265:unsigned 228:contribs 216:unsigned 179:contribs 167:unsigned 112:Football 59:Football 659:; it's 371:Cayafas 139:on the 608:WP:NOR 244:Kante4 192:Kante4 36:scale. 672:rule. 757:talk 751:. -- 738:talk 723:talk 678:talk 621:talk 604:see: 599:fact 583:talk 562:talk 547:talk 522:talk 504:talk 482:talk 452:talk 430:talk 401:talk 375:talk 347:talk 323:talk 273:talk 248:talk 241:FIFA 224:talk 196:talk 175:talk 158:Flag 692:Jay 689:Pee 636:Jay 633:Pee 362:Jay 359:Pee 288:Jay 285:Pee 131:Mid 772:: 759:) 740:) 725:) 680:) 623:) 585:) 564:) 549:) 524:) 516:-- 506:) 484:) 454:) 432:) 407:) 403:) 377:) 349:) 325:) 275:) 250:) 230:) 226:• 198:) 181:) 177:• 755:( 736:( 721:( 676:( 619:( 606:( 581:( 560:( 545:( 520:( 502:( 480:( 450:( 428:( 399:( 395:( 373:( 345:( 321:( 271:( 246:( 222:( 194:( 173:( 143:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Football
WikiProject icon
icon
Association football portal
WikiProject Football
Association football
the discussion
Mid
project's importance scale
unsigned
ShaneMc2010
talk
contribs
11:56, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
Kante4
talk
12:00, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
unsigned
Thecomaboy
talk
contribs
14:13, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
FIFA
Kante4
talk
14:53, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑