Knowledge

Talk:2011 FIFA Women's World Cup

Source đź“ť

1200:@Walter: For the fourth time: It is obvious that you can figure out the scenarios on the basis of the group tables. Why you keep repeating this point is puzzling, to say the least. Again, if the article consisted of not much more than detailed match reports, you could discern just about every facet of the tournament. So suppose someone argued that there should be nothing but a schedule of matches and match reports in the article. Then she would say pretty much exactly what you're saying. She would say of the group tables, "They say nothing that can't be deduced from the match reports". The right response to this ridiculous suggestion that the match tables be eliminated is that IT DOESN'T MATTER that it is possible to deduce what you want to know from the information provided. It would be possible to deduce what you want to know if the article were written in binary. So what? Note that it actually takes a bit MORE work to figure out the scenarios on the basis of the tables than it does to figure out the tables on the basis of the match reports. So, I'll say it yet again: By your rationale, there shouldn't be any group tables in the article.-- 1075:@Walter: My little equation was just meant to indicate what I meant when I said "The scenarios make sense". I am quite aware that "makes sense" does not literally mean the same thing as "appropriate to include". But it is only if you want to be incredibly uncharitable and painfully pedantic that this point matters. The real point is that you have now made three complaints about including the scenarios. Again, the first two are based on claims that are demonstrably false. You have said nothing to indicate why you think otherwise. As has already been pointed out to you, the draw possibilities you mention have no bearing on qualification or elimination in the next round of play. Your third point is one that strongly suggests the tables themselves should not be included. If elimination of the tables is not a good idea, then doing away with the scenarios is not a good idea either. Ergo, the scenarios shouldn't be deleted. And when someone has suggested that something ridiculous follows from what you've said, just saying it again doesn't do much to make your case.-- 1185:
advance if they defeat Team B and Team C do not defeat Team D - "do not defeat" specifically includes the possibility of a draw. When a draw is not mentioned, it's because a draw would not lead to the noted team clinching or being eliminated. As far as the scenarios being trivial, that is your opinion and I doubt anything I say will change it. All I can address is the factual part of your objections, which hopefully I've done. By all means, if you notice a scenario in the article that is factually inaccurate or incomplete (within the scope of the next match day), please correct it.
910:
start - and it generally does). Within that context all eliminations and advancements are discussed - with no preference given (I'm not really sure what that is meant to mean - are you complaining we don't say how Canada might advance just because they can't, or that it is unfair to give preference to the teams that might advance by noting that?). These things have been worked out over a long perid of time. I think the problem here is you just don't get it.
1218:(this is obviously on the last match day rather than this early on). Sometimes the alternatives aren't obvious. This is even more true given that there are two (or even more by some ways of counting) different ways to determine who advances when teams are tied on points - something that isn't obvious "just from the tables". The scenarios help people to know what a given team needs to do to advance in a simple (and consistent) manner. 349: 148: 418: 397: 87: 325: 53: 184: 428: 73: 595: 22: 249: 218: 259: 1932: 1133:
participating, the stadium where each game is played, the leading goal scorers, the structure of the knockout bracket, and pretty much everything else about the tournament if the article consisted of nothing but semi-detailed match reports. But that would be a really crappy encyclopedia entry. Is that what you want the article to look like? --
1788: 587: 895:
and preferential scenarios are just a waste of space. They should be eliminated until there's something important to write about. And not all of the scenarios as you mentioned are listed. There were usually only two per group. Not all eliminations. Not all possible advancements. Certainly no draw scenarios discussed. --
1640:
Actually it's not. There are many that take longer to update. In fact, I would argue that it should not be updated during game play and only after full-time. As for other events, what's to update? Perhaps in Virginia everything happens and then is instantaneously updated on Knowledge, but in the rest
1147:
Actually, it's not like talking to wall. I'm listening, but you're not saying anything worth hearing. No the tables aren't trivial as they reflect the outcome of past matches. Anyone who knows how to read them can understand how the potential results of future matches will affect the teams. Sorry you
1011:
In Group A Canada can NOT win the group with the next match so there is no mention about that, why should it as it covers only the next matchday, that´s described ahead of ALL scenarios, so please... It gives an overview of what can happen on this particular matchday. So i think we should put it back
879:
playing that can qualify/be eliminated will be listed. They are very standard features of all tournaments. They are also done this way (that is, show how each team can advance/be eliminated rather than list what each cominbation of results will imply) because it is a far more flexible way of doing
1292:
What this all comes down to is should the scenarios stay or go. This encyclopedia is a collaborative effort and things are decided by consensus. Both sides have made the same argument numerous times and no one has changed there mind. All but one individual sees merit in the scenarios (and even that
1132:
It's like talking to a wall, but I will try one more time: Do you think that the group tables are examples of trivia? If not, then I fail to see why you think the scenarios are trivia. You could figure out all of the qualification/elimination scenarios, the group standings, the list of countries
983:
Good grief. "The scenarios make sense" = "It is appropriate to include them". Your first two complaints were that the scenarios were incomplete and that they didn't take into account all the countries playing. But both of those claims are just false. Now your complaint seems to be that a reader
968:
Did I say they didn't make sense? No. It makes sense. I said they're incomplete, as waste of space, and "verbal diarrhea". Useless information. Better just to leave the matches to be played rather than suppose what is required to qualify or be eliminated, which is obvious to anyone who can read the
953:
The scenarios make sense, as anyone who has ever followed a tournament of this sort well understands. They are not "verbal diarrhea". They constitute useful and relevant information. The complaints above verge on the nonsensical, for reasons that Jlsa has explained. It's true that past matchups
894:
They're not false. All nations in a group, or are we simply concerned with the two with the highest point totals. For instance, in group A, it mentions Canada can be eliminated... as the only Canada-related scenario. Canada can also win the group if... was not at all discussed. Incomplete, partial,
1177:
It seems to me your opposition to including the scenarios in the article has 2 basic parts: (1) they are incomplete (i.e., don't include all the teams and don't mention draw possibilities) and (2) they are trivial. As to whether they are incomplete, you are mistaken. They don't list every team
909:
No draw scenarios are discussed because no team can be eliminated/qualified with a draw. If you bothered to actually read the section properly (and not just jump in) you would note that there is a context to the scenarios - what can happen on the next matchday (it should say that in words at the
1184:
which is all the scenarios focus on. It's not an exhaustive list of all the possible scenarios in all future matches. As far as the possibility of draws, they are certainly included where they would lead to a team either clinching or being eliminated on the next match day; such as "Team A will
854:
Are they needed? First, they're incomplete. They mention wins, but draws are a possibility. Second, they don't focus on all of the nations playing. We should simply not discuss scenarios until there's something concrete to discuss and should definitely mention all of the possible match outcomes.
874:
the teams that may qualify or be eliminated in the next match. So they DO cover all the concrete possibilities. If a match cannot see a team be eliminated or qualify then there is no scenario to mention, and if a team cannot advance or be eliminated then there is also no scenario - but
1060:
So everyone can understand it? How do you know that? You have to make it easy for everyone so when someone looks this article up with not much knowledge of it, the scenarios surely help. Also if a Team only advance if a), b) and c) happen, it is better to know that.
924:
I did read it properly and it's not just about Canada. I honestly do get it: it's verbal diarrhea designed to use time and space by those with sporting interests. While it's frequently done and has no purpose in an encyclopedia (any more than a scoreboard does).
984:
could determine the qualification and elimination scenarios by reading the table. Sure, she could, but by that rationale, why even include the tables? After all, a reader could reconstruct the tables from nothing more than a list of the scores.--
1293:
individual says that they are useful, just only when they think they are useful). That means the scenarios stay, unless someone can come up with a new reason, not already listed that gives validation to removing them and changes peoples minds.
1745:
In the article, it states that " Several of the stadiums are officially referred to simply as "FIFA World Cup Stadium", because FIFA prohibits sponsorship of stadiums unless the stadium sponsors are also official tournament sponsors. "
1031:
It doesn't give an overview of what can happen on a particular match day. It doesn't describe the draw scenarios. I think you will put it back just like the rest of the nonsensical trivia that gets put back into most sports articles.
954:
between two teams don't have a lot to do with the next round of matches in the tournament, but how anyone could compare that to scenarios for qualification and elimination (limited to the next round of play) is beyond me. --
1103:
Just keep saying that. Maybe if you repeat yourself enough times, you will suddenly and magically be right. Until then, could someone who knows how to reintroduce the qualification and elimination scenarios please do so?
506:
Unofficial sources cite at least 7 bidding nations, but I can only find specific mention of three: Australia, Canada, and France. Info on other candidates, especially links to their bid websites, would be most helpful.
72: 1815:
Does someone know if this game has subsequently been amended to a win for Columbia, due to North Korea having played with several doped players? Any results gained by doping are normally annulled, after all...
1505:
Noone (DFB, Bundesliga, German Newssites, ...) used Anonman before this Cup, so one can't say she is known by that. I think we should change it to Anonma, her correct name. Let's get some more opinions.
939:
It's like describing how many times two countries have played in past tournaments as if it has anything to do with the match about to be played. We'd all just be better off without the prose. --
374: 232: 173: 63: 1835:
The men's WC page has a section for player of the match of each match - should we add it here? The information is in FIFA's website, would give a little more "oomph" to the page. Thoughts?
2022: 2344: 1148:
don't understand why the scenarios are trivial: since they say nothing that can't be deduced from the results tables and coming matches, and without leaving any gaps in the statements. --
2088: 2078: 1596:), not with the list of players but say a small sentence/section stating that yellow cards are wiped out after the quarters and before that 2 yellow lead to a one match suspension. - 2379: 649:
Italy has not yet qualified for the World Cup. The azzurre have won their qualifying group and have advanced to the second round of UEFA qualifications, but have yet to qualify.
2369: 339: 379: 2329: 334: 228: 2374: 2339: 128: 2230: 138: 629:
I will change the map once the actual venues have been announced in September. There is no need for cosmetic changes on a map that will be outdated in two months.
2262: 2258: 2244: 2152: 2148: 2134: 2012: 2364: 2334: 1742:
Why didn't FIFA stick with the actual name of the stadium, "Commerzbank-Arena", instead of going ahead and calling it the "FIFA Women's World Cup Stadium"?
1909: 2023:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110608045458/http://www.dfb.de/index.php?id=500014&no_cache=1&tx_dfbnews_pi1%5BshowUid%5D=14063&cHash=c04eee2ef1
2359: 2324: 305: 1749:
Commerzbank is an official tournament sponsor, but on FIFA.com, the stadium is just referred to as "FIFA Women's World Cup Stadium". Anyone know why?
1440:
Every source so far, club website, the dfb site, and every news site at least in germany called her Anonma. Anonman started just now. So, who know's. -
736:
Section 2 (Venues) needs some picturees (Wolfsburg). I am trying to get WikiCommons to approve some photos it the following days. Please help, thanks.
104: 2089:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110707105502/http://www.dfb.de/index.php?id=500014&tx_dfbnews_pi1%5BshowUid%5D=28123&tx_dfbnews_pi4%5Bcat%5D=167
2079:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110707105502/http://www.dfb.de/index.php?id=500014&tx_dfbnews_pi1%5BshowUid%5D=28123&tx_dfbnews_pi4%5Bcat%5D=167
315: 1477:
She herself declared her name is Anonma, a buereu in her country mispelled a new passport, which is the source for the fifa website and the jersey. -
2394: 484: 474: 361: 160: 2044: 1214:
I would even disagree with the "you can work it out from the table" point. In the last WC finals, people tried putting the scenarios together and
2026: 2110: 2002: 2384: 1520:
A german newspaper pointed that out and said that the FIFA made a misstake and that she is called Anonma. The article was from a few days ago.
2092: 2082: 1899: 1028:"It is appropriate to include them". Just because I understand them (hence they make sense) doesn't mean that it's appropriate to be included. 2399: 1491:
So what do we do? I personally think it should be what she's known by, which is what's on her jersey, but I'm not getting into it anymore...
1625: 366: 165: 100: 94: 58: 2349: 1708: 1678: 552: 281: 2354: 1752: 702: 656: 615: 567: 450: 522:
This says by Germany's bid that they're the only nation who competed in all editions and won. When exactly did the US team not play?
2389: 2240:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
2234: 2130:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
1201: 1134: 1105: 1076: 985: 955: 2231:
https://archive.is/20110613153928/http://www.espnmediazone3.com/us/2011/03/23/2011-fifa-women%E2%80%99s-world-cup-schedule-on-espn/
2120: 1851: 536:
to fulfill those conditions, the US isn't bidding to host this edition. Feel free to change the wording if necessary. Thanks, --
2013:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110712204353/http://www.fifa.com/womensworldcup/destination/stadiums/stadium%3D5001653/index.html
1118:
No repetition needed Toronto, unless you want to convince yourself that this trivia is actually saying something important. --
1454:
Say, I just changed it before seeing this. I noted it ends in 'n' on her jersey; it's also spelled that way on her FIFA page
272: 223: 199:
or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the
1178:
because not every team has a possiblity of either clinching a spot in the next round or of being eliminated from contention
1770:
Can someone edit it because it is linking to the men's team, not the women's team. I would but I am terrible at editing.--
441: 402: 1910:
https://web.archive.org/20110718115105/http://www.fifa.com:80/womensworldcup/organisation/media/newsid=1475411/index.html
2305: 2214: 2195: 1986: 1871: 1566: 1357: 33: 2016: 679: 1046:
The "scenarios" say nothing that someone who can read the tables can't understand and as such are a waste of space. --
264: 1646: 1255: 1153: 1123: 1094: 1051: 1037: 974: 944: 930: 900: 860: 819: 2104: 2066: 2060: 2054: 2038: 1404: 1346: 783: 763:. But I guess its notability for this article will very likely be a function of its success, or otherwise. Thanks. 741: 1913: 676: 634: 514: 2261:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
2151:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
2045:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110512032815/http://www.dfb.de/fileadmin/user_upload/2011/04/20110414172633301.pdf
1474: 99:, a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Knowledge. For more information, visit the 2027:
http://www.dfb.de/index.php?id=500014&no_cache=1&tx_dfbnews_pi1%5BshowUid%5D=14063&cHash=c04eee2ef1
1821: 1795:. BTW: Just try with the editing, if you do something wrong, people will let you know and try to help you. ;-) 833: 805: 768: 2111:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110712191704/http://www.fifa.com/womensworldcup/statistics/players/topgoals.html
1629: 828:
Notable for its bizarre novelty and uniqueness. But I doubt anyone would ever want it in this article. Shame.
2003:
https://web.archive.org/web/20100308070023/http://www.fifa.com/aboutfifa/federation/news/newsid%3D625447.html
2296: 2222: 2186: 1994: 1756: 1712: 1682: 1278:
Please give a reason why they don´t make sense instead of just saying that. Nothing else expected though...
706: 660: 619: 571: 556: 192: 2093:
http://www.dfb.de/index.php?id=500014&tx_dfbnews_pi1%5BshowUid%5D=28123&tx_dfbnews_pi4%5Bcat%5D=167
2083:
http://www.dfb.de/index.php?id=500014&tx_dfbnews_pi1%5BshowUid%5D=28123&tx_dfbnews_pi4%5Bcat%5D=167
1900:
https://web.archive.org/20110722140456/http://www.fifa.com:80/womensworldcup/news/newsid=1476704/index.html
1692:
There never were those, and not even the men have those. THey are uninteressing for spectators and teams. -
1205: 1138: 1109: 1080: 989: 959: 870:
Firstly, all the comments aobve are just false. The scenarios (when done properly as they are here) cover
2218: 1847: 1642: 1251: 1149: 1119: 1090: 1047: 1033: 970: 940: 926: 896: 856: 815: 2280:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2268: 2170:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2158: 2048: 1964: 1944:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1400: 1342: 779: 737: 523: 39: 2221:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 1993:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 2114: 2098: 2072: 2032: 1593: 1422: 2006: 1843: 1839: 1621: 1592:
I don't think a list of all players receiving a card is needed here. One could of couse refer to it (
1554: 652: 630: 277: 1903: 1264:
Why the difference? Is being eliminated on the second day somehow less relevant than on the third?
21: 1817: 1496: 1463: 1430: 1312: 1298: 1190: 829: 801: 797: 764: 449:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
280:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2235:
http://www.espnmediazone3.com/us/2011/03/23/2011-fifa-women%E2%80%99s-world-cup-schedule-on-espn/
1618:
This is the slowest-updated page I've ever encountered for a major sporting event on Knowledge.
1250:
After the second match day, the scenarios may make sense. After match day one, absolutely not. --
2265:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
2155:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
2281: 2171: 2121:
https://web.archive.org/web/20080502022304/http://www.dfb.de/index.php?id=504446&no_cache=1
1945: 1881: 1775: 1697: 1601: 1511: 1482: 1445: 1241: 721: 687: 1960: 1800: 1727: 1677:
Why aren't there any fifth- or seventh-place playoffs in the 2011 FIFA Women's World Cup? --
1660: 1583: 1562: 1525: 1455: 1365: 1283: 1066: 1017: 793: 2310: 2288: 2200: 2178: 1972: 1952: 1855: 1825: 1804: 1779: 1760: 1731: 1716: 1701: 1686: 1664: 1650: 1633: 1605: 1587: 1570: 1529: 1515: 1500: 1486: 1467: 1449: 1434: 1408: 1390: 1369: 1350: 1316: 1302: 1287: 1273: 1259: 1245: 1227: 1209: 1194: 1157: 1142: 1127: 1113: 1098: 1084: 1070: 1055: 1041: 1021: 993: 978: 963: 948: 934: 919: 904: 889: 864: 837: 823: 809: 787: 772: 745: 725: 710: 691: 664: 638: 623: 575: 540: 526: 517: 1889: 2247:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 2137:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 2124: 1492: 1459: 1426: 1386: 1308: 1294: 1269: 1223: 1186: 915: 885: 433: 196: 2287:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
2177:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1951:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1089:
The only thing that is demonstrably false is the idea that these are needed at all. --
2318: 2017:
http://www.fifa.com/womensworldcup/destination/stadiums/stadium%3D5001653/index.html
680:
http://es.fifa.com/mm/document/tournament/competition/01/42/03/73/listofreferees.pdf
1771: 1693: 1597: 1507: 1478: 1441: 1237: 717: 701:
shouldn't the article mention what countries/channels the games will be shown on?--
683: 360: 159: 2105:
http://www.fifa.com/womensworldcup/organisation/media/newsid%3D1475411/index.html
2067:
http://www.fifa.com/womensworldcup/organisation/media/newsid%3D1470844/index.html
2061:
http://www.fifa.com/womensworldcup/organisation/media/newsid%3D1463338/index.html
2055:
http://www.fifa.com/womensworldcup/organisation/media/newsid%3D1420384/index.html
2039:
http://www.fifa.com/womensworldcup/organisation/media/newsid%3D1376651/index.html
760: 2254: 2144: 1796: 1723: 1656: 1579: 1558: 1521: 1361: 1279: 1062: 1013: 756: 537: 348: 147: 1914:
http://www.fifa.com/womensworldcup/organisation/media/newsid=1475411/index.html
677:
http://www.fifa.com/womensworldcup/organisation/media/newsid=1420384/index.html
2253:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 2143:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 1378: 423: 417: 396: 356: 324: 254: 183: 155: 1475:
http://www.gmx.net/themen/sport/frauenwm/aktuelles/107tdem-ich-heisse-anonma
1401:
A comment by a person who has been editing Knowledge since October 28, 2010.
1382: 1343:
A comment by a person who has been editing Knowledge since October 28, 2010.
1265: 1219: 911: 881: 780:
A comment by a person who has been editing Knowledge since October 28, 2010.
738:
A comment by a person who has been editing Knowledge since October 28, 2010.
614:
should be moved as well. Please check and correct the locations! Thanks. --
594: 86: 52: 880:
it - they can cover groups of any size, different match dates and so on.
1886:
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add
258: 248: 217: 1425:
her name is Anonman, but your article says Anonma. Which is correct? --
603: 446: 1939:
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
2049:
http://www.dfb.de/fileadmin/user_upload/2011/04/20110414172633301.pdf
611: 2115:
http://www.fifa.com/womensworldcup/statistics/players/topgoals.html
2099:
http://www.fifa.com/womensworldcup/news/newsid%3D1476704/index.html
2073:
http://www.fifa.com/womensworldcup/news/newsid%3D1342267/index.html
2033:
http://www.fifa.com/womensworldcup/news/newsid%3D1441231/index.html
1594:
http://www.fifa.com/womensworldcup/statistics/players/topcards.html
1341:
What time zone are the soccer matches listed in? UTC, EST? Thanks,
2007:
http://www.fifa.com/aboutfifa/federation/news/newsid%3D625447.html
1894:
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
1641:
of the world, we wait for facts and references before updating. --
800:, but not quite as successful. Some great YouTube videos, though. 607: 593: 585: 1904:
http://www.fifa.com/womensworldcup/news/newsid=1476704/index.html
1374: 586: 1232:
On a humorous note, look at these monster tie breakers at the
566:
Germany was chosen as host on 30 October 2007 by the FIFA. --
15: 1919:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
347: 323: 182: 146: 2225:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1997:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1707:
If they were, Germany would have participated in these. --
103:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the 759:
has been established for this tournament and is reported
1578:
Nope. A reason is maybe that not a whole lot are given.
1990: 1875: 1870:
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
1233: 602:
The location map of the 2011 venues is not very good.
1236:
that arise if some best third placed teams advance. -
2125:
http://www.dfb.de/index.php?id=504446&no_cache=1
445:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 276:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2257:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 2147:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 1027:Good grief. "The scenarios make sense" <: --> 778:Exactly what does that have to do with the Cup? 2243:This message was posted before February 2018. 2133:This message was posted before February 2018. 2345:Automatically assessed Women's sport articles 1356:All times are in the CEST time zone (UTC+2), 8: 2370:High-importance football in Germany articles 1550:Is there a table of yellow and red cards? 2213:I have just modified one external link on 1985:I have just modified 16 external links on 391: 212: 47: 2380:High-importance Women's football articles 174:the Women's football / soccer task force 2375:Football in Germany task force articles 1012:in as you are the only one against it. 393: 214: 49: 19: 2330:High-importance Women's sport articles 200: 1655:Maybew empty your cache and history? 7: 2365:B-Class football in Germany articles 2340:Women's football task force articles 439:This article is within the scope of 270:This article is within the scope of 92:This article is within the scope of 606:, for example is much to far east, 367:Women's association football portal 166:Women's association football portal 113:Knowledge:WikiProject Women's sport 38:It is of interest to the following 116:Template:WikiProject Women's sport 14: 2360:High-importance football articles 2335:B-Class Women's football articles 2217:. Please take a moment to review 1989:. Please take a moment to review 1874:. Please take a moment to review 1381:, German Summer Time, Local Time 814:An not a notable. Keep it out. -- 551:When will the host be chosen? -- 1930: 1786: 426: 416: 395: 359: 257: 247: 216: 158: 85: 71: 51: 20: 2395:Mid-importance Germany articles 2103:Corrected formatting/usage for 2097:Corrected formatting/usage for 2071:Corrected formatting/usage for 2065:Corrected formatting/usage for 2059:Corrected formatting/usage for 2053:Corrected formatting/usage for 2037:Corrected formatting/usage for 2031:Corrected formatting/usage for 479:This article has been rated as 375:the women's football task force 310:This article has been rated as 133:This article has been rated as 2325:B-Class Women's sport articles 335:the German football task force 290:Knowledge:WikiProject Football 1: 2385:WikiProject Football articles 1856:21:55, 22 December 2014 (UTC) 459:Knowledge:WikiProject Germany 453:and see a list of open tasks. 372:This article is supported by 332:This article is supported by 293:Template:WikiProject Football 284:and see a list of open tasks. 171:This article is supported by 2400:WikiProject Germany articles 1973:08:32, 12 January 2016 (UTC) 462:Template:WikiProject Germany 2311:08:51, 7 January 2018 (UTC) 2215:2011 FIFA Women's World Cup 1987:2011 FIFA Women's World Cup 1872:2011 FIFA Women's World Cup 1826:18:29, 28 August 2011 (UTC) 265:Association football portal 2416: 2350:WikiProject Women articles 2274:(last update: 5 June 2024) 2210:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 2164:(last update: 5 June 2024) 1982:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 1892:|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} 1867:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 1722:Not a good troll attempt. 692:06:02, 25 April 2011 (UTC) 518:03:22, 8 August 2005 (UTC) 485:project's importance scale 316:project's importance scale 139:project's importance scale 2355:B-Class football articles 2201:07:18, 19 June 2017 (UTC) 1805:21:35, 17 July 2011 (UTC) 1780:21:33, 17 July 2011 (UTC) 1761:01:55, 13 July 2011 (UTC) 1732:11:12, 10 July 2011 (UTC) 1717:09:06, 10 July 2011 (UTC) 1702:08:01, 10 July 2011 (UTC) 1687:07:06, 10 July 2011 (UTC) 1665:01:34, 10 July 2011 (UTC) 1651:01:15, 10 July 2011 (UTC) 1634:01:12, 10 July 2011 (UTC) 1288:20:50, 30 June 2011 (UTC) 1274:14:13, 30 June 2011 (UTC) 1260:13:59, 30 June 2011 (UTC) 1246:06:48, 30 June 2011 (UTC) 1228:06:18, 30 June 2011 (UTC) 1210:05:56, 30 June 2011 (UTC) 1195:05:23, 30 June 2011 (UTC) 1158:04:49, 30 June 2011 (UTC) 1143:04:35, 30 June 2011 (UTC) 1128:04:06, 30 June 2011 (UTC) 1114:04:00, 30 June 2011 (UTC) 1099:03:27, 30 June 2011 (UTC) 1085:01:58, 30 June 2011 (UTC) 1071:01:39, 30 June 2011 (UTC) 1056:01:36, 30 June 2011 (UTC) 1042:01:35, 30 June 2011 (UTC) 1022:01:24, 30 June 2011 (UTC) 994:01:05, 30 June 2011 (UTC) 979:00:50, 30 June 2011 (UTC) 964:00:39, 30 June 2011 (UTC) 949:00:17, 30 June 2011 (UTC) 935:00:15, 30 June 2011 (UTC) 920:23:31, 29 June 2011 (UTC) 905:23:17, 29 June 2011 (UTC) 890:23:10, 29 June 2011 (UTC) 865:21:57, 29 June 2011 (UTC) 838:18:01, 19 July 2011 (UTC) 824:17:50, 19 July 2011 (UTC) 810:17:14, 19 July 2011 (UTC) 773:18:01, 27 June 2011 (UTC) 746:05:24, 27 June 2011 (UTC) 716:Sure, start the section.- 665:17:40, 17 July 2010 (UTC) 639:17:57, 30 July 2008 (UTC) 478: 411: 355: 331: 309: 242: 190: 154: 132: 95:WikiProject Women's sport 80: 46: 2390:B-Class Germany articles 1811:North Korea vs. Columbia 1606:11:03, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 1588:02:27, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 1571:02:12, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 1530:16:40, 6 July 2011 (UTC) 1516:16:39, 6 July 2011 (UTC) 1501:16:33, 6 July 2011 (UTC) 1487:16:29, 6 July 2011 (UTC) 1468:16:14, 6 July 2011 (UTC) 1450:15:58, 3 July 2011 (UTC) 1435:13:54, 3 July 2011 (UTC) 1409:21:26, 3 July 2011 (UTC) 1391:13:45, 2 July 2011 (UTC) 1370:13:44, 2 July 2011 (UTC) 1351:13:40, 2 July 2011 (UTC) 1317:14:09, 1 July 2011 (UTC) 1303:12:45, 1 July 2011 (UTC) 788:05:20, 3 July 2011 (UTC) 726:17:38, 30 May 2011 (UTC) 711:16:50, 30 May 2011 (UTC) 624:15:34, 1 June 2008 (UTC) 576:15:34, 1 June 2008 (UTC) 541:22:53, 1 June 2007 (UTC) 527:22:30, 31 May 2007 (UTC) 2206:External links modified 1978:External links modified 1863:External links modified 1397:GERMANCEST+02:00UTC/GMT 561:(signature added later) 1181:on the next match day, 599: 591: 532:It says it's the only 352: 328: 191:This article has been 187: 151: 119:Women's sport articles 28:This article is rated 755:An oracular group of 597: 589: 351: 327: 186: 150: 97:(and women in sports) 2255:regular verification 2145:regular verification 1927:to let others know. 1878:. If necessary, add 1831:Player of the Match? 1673:Fifth-place playoffs 515:Supersexyspacemonkey 278:Association football 273:WikiProject Football 2245:After February 2018 2135:After February 2018 1923:parameter below to 1307:Well said, Chris. 798:2010 FIFA World Cup 796:had to do with the 442:WikiProject Germany 193:automatically rated 2299:InternetArchiveBot 2250:InternetArchiveBot 2189:InternetArchiveBot 2140:InternetArchiveBot 600: 592: 559:) 10 January 2007 353: 329: 188: 152: 34:content assessment 2275: 2165: 1971: 1859: 1842:comment added by 1738:Commerzbank-Arena 1624:comment added by 1574: 1557:comment added by 655:comment added by 562: 499: 498: 495: 494: 491: 490: 390: 389: 386: 385: 296:football articles 211: 210: 207: 206: 2407: 2309: 2300: 2273: 2272: 2251: 2199: 2190: 2163: 2162: 2141: 1967: 1966:Talk to my owner 1962: 1937: 1934: 1933: 1893: 1885: 1858: 1836: 1794: 1790: 1789: 1636: 1573: 1551: 1473:Found a source. 1399:, okay. Thanks, 794:Paul the Octopus 792:Just as much as 761:here (in German) 667: 560: 467: 466: 465:Germany articles 463: 460: 457: 436: 431: 430: 429: 420: 413: 412: 407: 399: 392: 369: 364: 363: 298: 297: 294: 291: 288: 267: 262: 261: 251: 244: 243: 238: 235: 233:Women's football 220: 213: 202: 168: 163: 162: 121: 120: 117: 114: 111: 89: 82: 81: 76: 75: 74: 69: 66: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 2415: 2414: 2410: 2409: 2408: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2315: 2314: 2303: 2298: 2266: 2259:have permission 2249: 2223:this simple FaQ 2208: 2193: 2188: 2156: 2149:have permission 2139: 1995:this simple FaQ 1980: 1970: 1965: 1935: 1931: 1887: 1879: 1865: 1837: 1833: 1813: 1787: 1785: 1768: 1766:Final Positions 1740: 1675: 1619: 1616: 1552: 1548: 1419: 1339: 852: 753: 734: 699: 673: 650: 647: 645:Qualified teams 631:EnemyOfTheState 584: 549: 504: 464: 461: 458: 455: 454: 432: 427: 425: 405: 380:High-importance 365: 358: 340:High-importance 312:High-importance 295: 292: 289: 286: 285: 263: 256: 237:High‑importance 236: 226: 164: 157: 135:High-importance 118: 115: 112: 109: 108: 70: 68:High‑importance 67: 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 2413: 2411: 2403: 2402: 2397: 2392: 2387: 2382: 2377: 2372: 2367: 2362: 2357: 2352: 2347: 2342: 2337: 2332: 2327: 2317: 2316: 2293: 2292: 2285: 2238: 2237: 2229:Added archive 2207: 2204: 2183: 2182: 2175: 2128: 2127: 2119:Added archive 2117: 2109:Added archive 2107: 2101: 2095: 2087:Added archive 2085: 2077:Added archive 2075: 2069: 2063: 2057: 2051: 2043:Added archive 2041: 2035: 2029: 2021:Added archive 2019: 2011:Added archive 2009: 2001:Added archive 1979: 1976: 1963: 1957: 1956: 1949: 1917: 1916: 1908:Added archive 1906: 1898:Added archive 1864: 1861: 1832: 1829: 1818:Roentgenium111 1812: 1809: 1808: 1807: 1767: 1764: 1739: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1705: 1704: 1674: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1643:Walter Görlitz 1626:69.137.229.103 1615: 1612: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1547: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1418: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1372: 1338: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1327: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1252:Walter Görlitz 1234:U-17 Worlc Cup 1216:got them wrong 1175: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1150:Walter Görlitz 1120:Walter Görlitz 1091:Walter Görlitz 1048:Walter Görlitz 1044: 1034:Walter Görlitz 1029: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1004: 1003: 1002: 1001: 1000: 999: 998: 997: 996: 971:Walter Görlitz 941:Walter Görlitz 937: 927:Walter Görlitz 897:Walter Görlitz 857:Walter Görlitz 851: 848: 847: 846: 845: 844: 843: 842: 841: 840: 830:Martinevans123 816:Walter Görlitz 802:Martinevans123 765:Martinevans123 752: 749: 733: 730: 729: 728: 698: 695: 672: 669: 646: 643: 642: 641: 583: 580: 579: 578: 548: 545: 544: 543: 503: 500: 497: 496: 493: 492: 489: 488: 481:Mid-importance 477: 471: 470: 468: 451:the discussion 438: 437: 434:Germany portal 421: 409: 408: 406:Mid‑importance 400: 388: 387: 384: 383: 371: 370: 354: 344: 343: 330: 320: 319: 308: 302: 301: 299: 282:the discussion 269: 268: 252: 240: 239: 221: 209: 208: 205: 204: 189: 179: 178: 170: 169: 153: 143: 142: 131: 125: 124: 122: 90: 78: 77: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2412: 2401: 2398: 2396: 2393: 2391: 2388: 2386: 2383: 2381: 2378: 2376: 2373: 2371: 2368: 2366: 2363: 2361: 2358: 2356: 2353: 2351: 2348: 2346: 2343: 2341: 2338: 2336: 2333: 2331: 2328: 2326: 2323: 2322: 2320: 2313: 2312: 2307: 2302: 2301: 2290: 2286: 2283: 2279: 2278: 2277: 2270: 2264: 2260: 2256: 2252: 2246: 2241: 2236: 2232: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2224: 2220: 2216: 2211: 2205: 2203: 2202: 2197: 2192: 2191: 2180: 2176: 2173: 2169: 2168: 2167: 2160: 2154: 2150: 2146: 2142: 2136: 2131: 2126: 2122: 2118: 2116: 2112: 2108: 2106: 2102: 2100: 2096: 2094: 2090: 2086: 2084: 2080: 2076: 2074: 2070: 2068: 2064: 2062: 2058: 2056: 2052: 2050: 2046: 2042: 2040: 2036: 2034: 2030: 2028: 2024: 2020: 2018: 2014: 2010: 2008: 2004: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1996: 1992: 1988: 1983: 1977: 1975: 1974: 1968: 1961: 1954: 1950: 1947: 1943: 1942: 1941: 1940: 1928: 1926: 1922: 1915: 1911: 1907: 1905: 1901: 1897: 1896: 1895: 1891: 1883: 1877: 1873: 1868: 1862: 1860: 1857: 1853: 1849: 1845: 1841: 1830: 1828: 1827: 1823: 1819: 1810: 1806: 1802: 1798: 1793: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1777: 1773: 1765: 1763: 1762: 1758: 1754: 1750: 1747: 1743: 1737: 1733: 1729: 1725: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1714: 1710: 1709:84.61.169.206 1703: 1699: 1695: 1691: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1684: 1680: 1679:84.61.169.206 1672: 1666: 1662: 1658: 1654: 1653: 1652: 1648: 1644: 1639: 1638: 1637: 1635: 1631: 1627: 1623: 1613: 1607: 1603: 1599: 1595: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1585: 1581: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1572: 1568: 1564: 1560: 1556: 1545: 1531: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1513: 1509: 1504: 1503: 1502: 1498: 1494: 1490: 1489: 1488: 1484: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1471: 1469: 1465: 1461: 1457: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1447: 1443: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1432: 1428: 1424: 1421:According to 1417:Correct name? 1416: 1410: 1406: 1402: 1398: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1388: 1384: 1380: 1376: 1373: 1371: 1367: 1363: 1359: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1348: 1344: 1336: 1318: 1314: 1310: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1285: 1281: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1257: 1253: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1243: 1239: 1235: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1225: 1221: 1217: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1207: 1203: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1192: 1188: 1183: 1182: 1159: 1155: 1151: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1140: 1136: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1125: 1121: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1111: 1107: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1068: 1064: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1053: 1049: 1045: 1043: 1039: 1035: 1030: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1019: 1015: 995: 991: 987: 982: 981: 980: 976: 972: 967: 966: 965: 961: 957: 952: 951: 950: 946: 942: 938: 936: 932: 928: 923: 922: 921: 917: 913: 908: 907: 906: 902: 898: 893: 892: 891: 887: 883: 878: 873: 869: 868: 867: 866: 862: 858: 849: 839: 835: 831: 827: 826: 825: 821: 817: 813: 812: 811: 807: 803: 799: 795: 791: 790: 789: 785: 781: 777: 776: 775: 774: 770: 766: 762: 758: 750: 748: 747: 743: 739: 731: 727: 723: 719: 715: 714: 713: 712: 708: 704: 696: 694: 693: 689: 685: 681: 678: 670: 668: 666: 662: 658: 654: 644: 640: 636: 632: 628: 627: 626: 625: 621: 617: 613: 609: 605: 598:german WP map 596: 588: 581: 577: 573: 569: 565: 564: 563: 558: 554: 553:72.139.19.189 546: 542: 539: 535: 531: 530: 529: 528: 525: 524:71.255.10.181 520: 519: 516: 511: 508: 502:Official Bids 501: 486: 482: 476: 473: 472: 469: 452: 448: 444: 443: 435: 424: 422: 419: 415: 414: 410: 404: 401: 398: 394: 381: 378:(assessed as 377: 376: 368: 362: 357: 350: 346: 345: 341: 338:(assessed as 337: 336: 326: 322: 321: 317: 313: 307: 304: 303: 300: 283: 279: 275: 274: 266: 260: 255: 253: 250: 246: 245: 241: 234: 230: 225: 222: 219: 215: 198: 194: 185: 181: 180: 176: 175: 167: 161: 156: 149: 145: 144: 140: 136: 130: 127: 126: 123: 110:Women's sport 106: 102: 98: 96: 91: 88: 84: 83: 79: 65: 60: 59:Women's sport 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 2297: 2294: 2269:source check 2248: 2242: 2239: 2212: 2209: 2187: 2184: 2159:source check 2138: 2132: 2129: 1984: 1981: 1958: 1938: 1929: 1924: 1920: 1918: 1869: 1866: 1838:— Preceding 1834: 1814: 1791: 1769: 1753:68.55.212.71 1751: 1748: 1744: 1741: 1706: 1676: 1620:— Preceding 1617: 1553:— Preceding 1549: 1420: 1396: 1340: 1215: 1180: 1179: 1176: 1010: 876: 871: 853: 754: 735: 703:24.218.11.38 700: 674: 671:referee list 657:66.81.159.47 648: 616:89.61.112.91 601: 568:89.61.112.91 550: 533: 521: 512: 509: 505: 480: 440: 373: 333: 311: 271: 172: 134: 101:project page 93: 40:WikiProjects 1358:Listed here 1202:70.26.89.45 1135:70.26.89.45 1106:70.26.89.45 1077:70.26.89.45 986:70.26.89.45 956:70.26.89.45 877:all nations 757:fruit flies 751:Fruit flies 651:—Preceding 590:present map 2319:Categories 2306:Report bug 2196:Report bug 1844:Tychomarxm 1546:Discipline 697:broadcasts 203:parameter. 105:discussion 2289:this tool 2282:this tool 2179:this tool 2172:this tool 1953:this tool 1946:this tool 1493:Smarkflea 1460:Smarkflea 1379:UTC+02:00 1337:time zone 1309:LarryJeff 1295:Chris1834 1187:LarryJeff 969:table. -- 850:Scenarios 534:candidate 2295:Cheers.— 2185:Cheers.— 1959:Cheers.— 1882:cbignore 1852:contribs 1840:unsigned 1622:unsigned 1567:contribs 1555:unsigned 1423:fifa.com 653:unsigned 510:Thanks. 287:Football 224:Football 2219:my edit 1991:my edit 1969::Online 1921:checked 1876:my edit 1772:Ddog892 1694:Koppapa 1614:Updates 1598:Koppapa 1508:Koppapa 1479:Koppapa 1442:Koppapa 1238:Koppapa 718:Koppapa 684:Feroang 675:sourse 604:Dresden 483:on the 456:Germany 447:Germany 403:Germany 314:on the 229:Germany 137:on the 30:B-class 1890:nobots 1797:Kante4 1724:Kante4 1657:Kante4 1580:Kante4 1559:Bob305 1522:Kante4 1427:Fredde 1362:Kante4 1280:Kante4 1063:Kante4 1014:Kante4 612:Bochum 582:Venues 538:Gabbec 201:|auto= 36:scale. 608:Essen 195:by a 1925:true 1848:talk 1822:talk 1801:talk 1792:Done 1776:talk 1757:talk 1728:talk 1713:talk 1698:talk 1683:talk 1661:talk 1647:talk 1630:talk 1602:talk 1584:talk 1563:talk 1526:talk 1512:talk 1497:talk 1483:talk 1470:... 1464:talk 1456:here 1446:talk 1431:talk 1405:talk 1395:Oh, 1387:talk 1383:Jlsa 1375:CEST 1366:talk 1347:talk 1313:talk 1299:talk 1284:talk 1270:talk 1266:Jlsa 1256:talk 1242:talk 1224:talk 1220:Jlsa 1206:talk 1191:talk 1154:talk 1139:talk 1124:talk 1110:talk 1095:talk 1081:talk 1067:talk 1052:talk 1038:talk 1018:talk 990:talk 975:talk 960:talk 945:talk 931:talk 916:talk 912:Jlsa 901:talk 886:talk 882:Jlsa 861:talk 834:talk 820:talk 806:talk 784:talk 769:talk 742:talk 732:Pics 722:talk 707:talk 688:talk 661:talk 635:talk 620:talk 610:and 572:talk 557:talk 547:Host 306:High 129:High 64:WOSO 2263:RfC 2233:to 2153:RfC 2123:to 2113:to 2091:to 2081:to 2047:to 2025:to 2015:to 2005:to 1912:to 1902:to 872:all 475:Mid 197:bot 2321:: 2276:. 2271:}} 2267:{{ 2166:. 2161:}} 2157:{{ 1888:{{ 1884:}} 1880:{{ 1854:) 1850:• 1824:) 1816:-- 1803:) 1778:) 1759:) 1730:) 1715:) 1700:) 1685:) 1663:) 1649:) 1632:) 1604:) 1586:) 1569:) 1565:• 1528:) 1514:) 1499:) 1485:) 1466:) 1458:. 1448:) 1433:) 1407:) 1389:) 1377:, 1368:) 1360:. 1349:) 1315:) 1301:) 1286:) 1272:) 1258:) 1244:) 1226:) 1208:) 1193:) 1156:) 1141:) 1126:) 1112:) 1104:-- 1097:) 1083:) 1069:) 1054:) 1040:) 1032:-- 1020:) 992:) 977:) 962:) 947:) 933:) 925:-- 918:) 903:) 888:) 863:) 855:-- 836:) 822:) 808:) 786:) 771:) 744:) 724:) 709:) 690:) 682:-- 663:) 637:) 622:) 574:) 513:-- 382:). 342:). 231:/ 227:: 62:: 2308:) 2304:( 2291:. 2284:. 2198:) 2194:( 2181:. 2174:. 1955:. 1948:. 1936:Y 1846:( 1820:( 1799:( 1774:( 1755:( 1726:( 1711:( 1696:( 1681:( 1659:( 1645:( 1628:( 1600:( 1582:( 1561:( 1524:( 1510:( 1506:- 1495:( 1481:( 1462:( 1444:( 1429:( 1403:( 1385:( 1364:( 1345:( 1311:( 1297:( 1282:( 1268:( 1254:( 1240:( 1222:( 1204:( 1189:( 1152:( 1137:( 1122:( 1108:( 1093:( 1079:( 1065:( 1050:( 1036:( 1016:( 988:( 973:( 958:( 943:( 929:( 914:( 899:( 884:( 859:( 832:( 818:( 804:( 782:( 767:( 740:( 720:( 705:( 686:( 659:( 633:( 618:( 570:( 555:( 487:. 318:. 177:. 141:. 107:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Women's sport
WOSO
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Women's sport
project page
discussion
High
project's importance scale
Taskforce icon
icon
Women's association football portal
the Women's football / soccer task force
Note icon
automatically rated
bot
WikiProject icon
Football
Germany
Women's football
WikiProject icon
icon
Association football portal
WikiProject Football
Association football
the discussion
High

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑