Talk:2017 in spaceflight

241:, this year could see the return of lunar sample return missions after 40 years. Unlike asteroid sample returns to date, where the ships were never really in orbit in the first place, so the surface "ascent" wasn't really a launch but a "backing away" maneuver, lunar sample return missions really do land and really do have to launch into orbit to get back to Earth. So, with that in mind, where do we put them? Some Apollo LM launches and Soviet sample-return launches are in years that haven't migrated to the current "x in spaceflight" format, and they alternatively include them in the regular list or in "deep space rendezvous". Ones in years that *have* migrated to the new format have a separate section for "off-world" orbital launches. Will that section be returning this year, or what? Will we need to fix old lists to streamline the format? 2042:"Things that reach space, but not necessarily orbit, at least partially with their own means of propulsion before they reach space, and then landed again, while some components, not necessarily the thing that landed, were at least planned to reach orbit during the launch". Seriously? What about "soft landings of spacecraft/rocket stages that were in orbit"? That includes Dragon, Soyuz, Shenzhou, Space Shuttle orbiters, potentially the second stage of F9 and New Glenn in the future, but not any existing rocket stages. Separately we can count reuses of spacecraft and rocket stages involved in orbital spaceflight. -- 1328: 1591: 2014:. I am of two minds about this, and I believe it's an editorial choice. We could decide to use these criteria (option A) or to restrict the scope to vehicles that were part of an orbital spaceflight attempt (option B). Option A would include suborbital vehicles such as the X-15, Spaceship One and New Shepard. Option B would cover only the Space Shuttle and the Falcon 9 boosters today, and it would add New Glenn when that one starts flying. Either way, we must explain the criteria properly. — 80: 2060:

we can formulate the criteria in a simpler way? In my previous comment I wrote "landed safely after reaching space under their own power", that's concise enough but we need the more precise bullet points to clarify edge cases. Alternately we could center the criteria around reusability, e.g. "safe landing of a reusable rocket-powered spacecraft". I am firmly against using this parameter for space capsules though: they are just payloads. —

828: 53: 189: 1286: 991:) 14:51. Real intelligent devolving things. Your a scumbag. I bring up something specific and you like a fool dumb it down with your Earth rotating the Sun comment. Obviousness Im not aiming for that. An advance probe after 39 and half years still working isn't a planet orbiting a star. If you want to argue my point you should bring up something equal to Voyager not something completely unrelated and unintelligible. 2978: 2875: 2870: 2865: 850: 486: 444: 156: 22: 2271:. Perhaps we need a footnote or a different background color to distinguish them? If we decide to list all cubesats as separate entries, then it would be unfair to not list trunk-carried scientific payloads which are generally more elaborate… but those things are not autonomous satellites. A suggestion: just list cubesats in the remarks field, with links for those that have articles. — 90: 842: 366:? In general, could we agree to mention sources next to planned launch dates? Those articles have a list of generic sources but it's really hard to track down what was announced by whom and to verify schedule changes. Please, let's add sources, that will simplify the maintenance job for everybody active on this article and related ones (rockets, spacecraft, spaceports). — 2838: 1562: 2823: 2512: 2357: 1454:(I wasn't aware of this message till I see this page. Somehow your ping template did not work?) It looked like all other entries use "geosynchronous" to mean "geostationary". Please correct if my assumption was wrong. QZSS constellation comprises three quazi-zenith orbit (QZO) satellites and one geostationary orbit (GEO) satellite. 2247:

In the years that I've been involved with editing these, I've included CubeSats that were stored inside Cygnus and Dragon and were deployed weeks later. Any omissions were the result of incomplete or hard-to-find sources. Going back and filling the rest in as we find them is fine, and I'd prefer that

2123:

As reported by the company, "Due to adverse financial conditions, XCOR had to terminate all employees as of 30 June 2017". But the company also said: "The company isn't dead. There's a core group of people working every day. The board is active and investors are committed.". Do we have to remove Lynx

2059:

Seen this way, it sounds weird, however from the angle of notability, I believe that the Falcon 9 boosters and Shuttle orbiters are in a class of their own, as the only rocket-powered orbital-class spacecraft that were designed to be reusable and indeed helped carry several payloads to orbit. Perhaps

1388:

I agree, Electron is designed and manufactured in NZ, so the rocket should be listed under NZ. The engines are manufactured in the US, but the convention on this page is that flags are assigned by country of rocket origin, not engine origin. For example, Atlas 5 uses Russian-built RD-180 engines, but

297:

That's why I compressed them into one entry rather than 40. I've tried to compress other "flocks" and multi-satellite missions on other launches into one entry in the same way for the same reason, multi-CubeSat launches are now commonplace and the individual hardware isn't notable. But I do think the

2767:

Yes, I have corrected it. There was a satellite which was initially deemed lost in LEO (accidentally achieved), but later raised its apogee by its own propulsion, so it eventually achieved GEO. Now we have the 91 launches: 85 successes + 6 failures (target orbits not achieved), and the 86 catalogued

450:

IMHO information like that should be sourced in each article. Launch vehicles have their own planned launches, which have to be sourced, and additionally payloads have an information about launch dates, which again: have to be sourced. Repeating the same sources for the 3rd time seems redundant, and

2683:

The Simorgh was launched again on July 27, 2017 from the Imam Khomeini Space Center in Semnan in north-central Iran. According to one media source, the Simorgh experienced a "catastrophic failure," likely exploding before it reached space. Reacting to the test, U.S. Strategic Command only confirmed

2237:

Apparently our listings are inconsistent. Cubesats launched from Cygnus were always included. Cubesats carried on board a cargo spacecraft and launched later from the ISS were sometimes included, sometimes omitted. Instruments carried in the Dragon trunk were sometimes listed as a separate payload,

1060:

The fact that the Voyager probes are still working is interesting. But it was interesting a year ago as well, and it will be interesting in a year as well. The time between 1.26 billion seconds and 1.29 billion seconds after launch doesn't have a special significance for the operation of the probe.

2644:

Indeed, Gunter's Space page says the launch intended to reach orbit, so that we should probably list this as a failed orbital launch. If Iranian sources do claim that the rocket has reached orbit (got a link to such sources?), they are probably misleading their audience, because no object has been

2027:

satisfies a notability criteria. Many sounding rocket stages are reusable and use parachutes for recovery, but it is almost never reported whether recovery is successful because they're small and cheap. The number would be invariably incomplete because not all sounding rocket launches are reported

2570:

When did we decide to split UKR out of the Russian statistics for Zenit and Dnepr? According to our guidelines for the "By country" section in the working group: "Note that former Soviet republics (eg. Ukraine) should be listed as "Russia/CIS"." Could someone point me to the discussion where the

2108:

Yes, like every satellite has attitude control thrusters and an apogee motor. Seems we can't reach consensus on what to include; better remove the parameter entirely. Counting reuses would be interesting, but I'm afraid it would open another can of worms (how much of a refurbishment is considered

2004:

Thanks for the information about the peak altitude of Shuttle boosters; we can then confidently include the Space Shuttle orbiters into the "landed safely after reaching space under their own power" category. Now you ask whether that's a useful grouping. Several sources discuss a number of those

1699:

I understand the goal is to list the number of Falcon 9 (and ultimately New Glenn) landings, but I worry that the way its phrased is misleading. The first stage of Falcon 9 doesn't go into orbit, while other things that land but aren't included in the definition you're using like the X-37B go to

785:

I had been previously including Juno's perijoves in the "Deep Space Rendezvous" section because they were spaced 53 days apart and I figured that was sufficient for notability. Now that the period reduction maneuver has been cancelled and the 53-day period will continue indefinitely, is that the

465:

I typically just reference my source in the edit comment if it's one of the generic sources already listed on the page, I think a good middle ground is to include a citation in the entry itself if the source is *not* one of the generic sources. If the source for the update is one of the generic

1663:

Sorry, I just noticed your question now. I have reported false positives for this particular source earlier, but I can't find a log of such reports in the IABot console. On the other hand, if I enter this page today, the bot tells me it is either live or whitelisted, which sounds great. Is the

1253:

why you count electron as New Zealand launch? If count by spaceport needs count Soyuz from Kourou as Europe or as Guiana but not Russia. I count Electron as the USA because Rocket Lab is US company, but have the FIRST spaceport in New Zealand, and have plans for use two spaceports in the USA.

1825:

Those criteria are unambiguous, hence easy to assess and verify. They would include almost all Shuttle missions, the recovered Falcon 9 boosters and some of the New Shepard test flights. They would exclude the Soyuz, Apollo, Dragon or other capsules, as well as the X-37B. What do my fellow

1982:

The Space Shuttle boosters didn't make it into space after dropping off (~60 km peak height if I remember correctly), if the orbiter didn't fire its engines it should have followed roughly the same trajectory - and stayed even lower if the engine was not used while the SRBs were active.

1745:

Would we then also need to add things like Soyuz and Dragon landings? Since Falcon 9 S1's are technically suborbital, would landings of New Shepard also be included? I just want to flesh out what exactly this category covers so that updating the number is an uncontroversial process.

790:

which had a massively elliptical multi-year orbit around the sun, but its close solar encounters lasted months at a time rather than a single day like the Juno perijoves so even then the comparison isn't perfect. Should Perijoves stay in the Deep Space Rendezvous section, or not?

1885:? Our Shuttle page says that boosters burned for 124 seconds while SSMEs fired for 480 seconds. What would be the maximum altitude reached by a fully-loaded Shuttle without firing its main engines? I very much doubt that it would reach the 100-km mark but don't have a 1171:

Yes, BulgariaSat is confirmed for mid-June, on a reused booster. After that, the timeframe for launching Intelsat 35e, Iridium 11–20 and SES-11 all in June is indeed unrealistic, but we should really wait for a non-forum source to move launches in this article. At

606:. As for language - it's not an issue at all, as long as source is reliable. Citation templates already support foreign language sources. I'm fine with having sources defined in the articles about payloads or rockets instead of having them here, but abandoning 979:

Guess we disagree. A probe still operating after 40 years and functioning and sending data and sending data back is definitely something happening now. Not as immediate is as a JUNO orbit or Cassini Orbit but still something active. And you guys keep track of

2221:

We've always included CubeSats carried inside Dragon, Cygnus, Progress, and HTV spacecraft before, why are we removing them in this instance? ISS modules have also been included in prior entries, though I can understand if CREAM does not qualify as a module.

1426:(called "quasi-zenith" for this project) are a special type of geosynchronous orbit. Do you have a source stating that QZS-3 uses a different orbit than the Tundra? As you apparently have access to recent Japanese sources, could you also perhaps update the 601:

If there's no reliable source for a launch date then we should not publish it at all. Knowledge is not a tabloid, we shouldn't pursuit the latest news at all costs. I'd much rather have a launch date set to TBD than blogs, tweets or forums as a so-called

952:

40th anniversary means something happened 40 years ago. Not this year. The fact that Earth rotated 40 times around the sun since the launch of Voyager has no particular significance for the probe. It will not change anything based on this number.

2238:

sometimes just mentioned in comments. I'm not aware of any cubesats carried by Progress. We should set up a rule and revisit prior years to apply it consistently. My hunch would be to only list payloads effectively launched during the flight. —

2449:

The Telesat launch in November shows a United States flag for the satellite flag icon. Telesat is a Canadian company, so I am wondering if that is a mistake, or is it being launched by an American subcontractor perhaps? Anyone have any idea?

2028:

consistently and very few recoveries are noted. New Shepard is much larger and its recovery is notable, but it isn't in a fundamentally different category from a Terrier-Improved Malemute or Black Brant or whatever other suborbital system.

1760:

New Shepard twice (booster+spacecraft)? F9 payload fairings? This is quickly getting complicated, and nothing you can summarize in 1 or 2 words in the infobox. What about the alternative category "reused boosters" or "reused spacecraft"?

298:

missions themselves are still notable, especially QB50. There's a lot of information I'm leaving out because it would be unwieldy but I wasn't sure if there was precedent for "various" or no country flag in that slot. What do you think?

2262:

I'm unsure which rule we should follow. Sure it's nice to have a comprehensive list of deployed satellites, but it's misleading to list items shipped to the ISS inside a cargo vehicle as separate payloads on a particular spaceflight.

1096:

Thanks for adding some planned suborbital flights. Do you have sources for the flights and planned dates? I'm particularly doubtful of the Lynx flight, as it seemed that the project was abandoned in 2016 after years of delays. —

2009:

vehicle was ever successfully developed, we can only expect a stage or the other to land back: first stage of the Falcon 9 and New Glenn, while the Shuttle orbiter can be considered a second-stage vehicle, similar to the future

539:

I think it's absolutely fine to reference the generic sources, but keeping this in the edit comment makes it difficult to check the sourcing at a glance. Perhaps we could agree on a few names for the generic sources, e.g.

1166:

Information from Reddit. I think will no five launches from SpaceX in June. We know dates for CRS-11 and Iridium also Stephen Clark in his tweet mentioned about BulgariaSat in June. I think SFN will be updated bit later.

165: 63: 1625:

This reported SFN as a false positive again. This site ain't dead, and it's annoying to fix things back repeatedly in many articles where it is cited, when the bot decides it may be dead. Please can somebody put

451:

might only lead to a situation where it's out of synch with more in-depth articles. This article should be nothing more than a reflection of articles it links to, an overview of one part of content from them.

1849:

Fair enough, but by your own figures, the reusable orbiter did contribute 20% to reaching space; the Boeing spaceplane contributes zero, being fully propelled by its carrier rocket like any satellite. —

2267:

for ISS-deployed cubesats are assigned in the ISS series, 1998-067XY, whereas those launched during a flight are assigned to the relevant launch, e.g. 2016-040B to 2016-040W for cubesats launched with

1859:

It contributes - a little bit. Without the boosters the Orbiters couldn't even lift off. Dragon contributes even less, but it does orbit circularization and increases apogee and perigee later. --

1700:

orbit and then land. I don't think the use of the term "landing" is clear enough in the infobox, and I think it would be best if it were modified or, barring a consensus forming, removed.

2371:

It's been a long time, but I finally got around to implementing this: CubeSats can now be displayed in a smaller font and with a slightly lighter background color. Currently active on

745:

took fire on the launch pad before the end of the countdown, so it is not counted in the list of launches; this is why adding successes and failures yields 786 launches instead of 785.

3048: 1121:

OK, I've added the source, thanks. Would be great to see Lynx fly! They have been off the radar following the management changes but they did say the project was not abandoned. —

640:. When cleaning up the relevant Soyuz pages, I counted 785 flights to date, making this one the 786th. I have explained my calculations and listed my sources in the infobox of 3012: 283:

but I realize it must have been hard work for you to collect the data. Don't you think it's a bit overkill? With the advent of cheap launch services with dispensers such as

1775:

Another good question. There's little in common between a Soyuz capsule, a Space Shuttle, a Falcon 9 first stage and a New Shepard, except for the fact they all cross the

3043: 1779:

and they all land non-destructively. So what do we want to include in the "Landings" field, and do we want such a field? I only added it to the infobox because

136: 2917:

I think that's fine; some people will prefer to read the tables immediately; only the one by rocket variant is collapsed by default because it's very long. —

1877:

contribute to reaching space, though (as defined in the Year in spaceflight articles by crossing the Kármán line). Can we assess whether the Shuttle boosters

146: 1736:

Good point: I would be in favor of adding the X-37B landings to the infobox count. No need to corner ourselves to Falcon boosters (and later New Glenn). —

2678: 1173: 2489:

Europe had the color NZ has now, that has some reasonable contrast. I suggest to give NZ a new color and to restore the original color for Europe. The

1294: 3053: 2485:

Currently Europe and the US have nearly the same color, and the difference between Europe and New Zealand is small as well. In previous articles and

1946:

This would include the Shuttle orbiter, Falcon 9 first stages and New Shepard boosters. Looking at other past or present vehicles, we would have the

3038: 2693: 806:

The Saturn moon flybys of Cassini are similar, even a bit more frequent. As the perijoves are the main science periods, I support listing them. --

2691: 397:

Thanks for double-checking. Now, I'd like to read opinions from other regular contributors to this page: should we mention sources to facilitate

1835:

Why do the Shuttle orbiters pass the first criterion? They needed the boosters (providing 80% of the initial thrust) and the big fuel tanks. --

319:

On reflection, I removed the flags. With so many countries of origin, they are not really informative, they bludgeon the page and they violate

112: 2005:

vehicles when chronicling spacecraft landing attempts; they usually make a distinction between orbital and suborbital flights. Noting that no

877:

Why is there no mention about Voyager 1s 40th anniversary since launch? It being the farthest man made object from Earth is a huge milestone.

1061:

This time span corresponds to a round number if we (a) take the orbit of Earth as time reference and (b) use the decimal system. So what? --

2410: 854:

starting with 2017, onwards. This will accurately reflect the international ownership of the company that's currently not reflected in the

835: 1364:

I agree. Can we give NZ a different color in the country summary chart, however? Currently it is nearly identical with Europe. DarkGreen

2958: 2931: 2900: 2878: 2797: 2750: 2719: 2695: 2627: 2164: 1390: 1306: 1211: 992: 911: 878: 205: 1557:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

103: 58: 287:, there will be many cases where dozens of cubesats are launched on a single rocket. Is it really necessary to list them all? — 2687: 2490: 1107:

Pietrobon's website is my primary source for suborbital flights, then I've searched for informations on many other websites. --

838:

of Arianespace (which was finalized on 31 December 2016) I propose changing flags next to the company (eg. on TBD lists) from

1440:

PS: I think it's entirely realistic for QZSS to deploy three satellites in a Tundra orbit and a fourth one in GEO, just like

2280:

It's not misleading if the remarks section notes that they were deployed from the ISS. I literally don't see an issue here.

3005: 2689: 1784: 2179:

I think the assumption was that it linked to a redirect. I'll create the redirect, but your change was probably correct.

3020: 2294:

In my opinion, it's a valid idea to list the CubeSats inside the space of the cargo vehicle, with a different colour. --

1614: 1547: 33: 2930:

Maybe dewikify the "group names" (take your mouse point on a picture to see the "hints" with "unclickable" wikilinks)?

2549:

Sure, although it doesn't make a difference. "Notes" can go unless a note is added, that makes a visible difference. --

1783:

had a "landings" parameter which was not displayed. I suppose this had been added as a reaction to the well-publicized

1970:

in 2004, both vehicles launch-assisted but crossing the line on their own power. I don't see anything else, do you? —

1422:

you said that QZS-3 is geostationary but you listed it as geosynchronous, which is not exactly the same. In fact, the

1339: 1301:

article counts NZ as the country of origin, so I'd recommend having disputes about country of origin of the rocket on

1430:

article which mentions only three satellites whereas we know there is a QZS-4 planned for late 2017 or early 2018? —

256:

Sure, there should be a section on orbital launches from other places than Earth. We'll create it when it happens. —

2811:

Yes, we could create similar graphs. I think the most informative one would be "by rocket". Let me give it a try. —

1295:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexknapp/2017/03/21/rocket-lab-becomes-a-space-unicorn-with-a-75-million-funding-round

2948:

That's a bug in the graph code. If we remove the links here, they also disappear in the legends. Not a big deal. —

2318:, but then we need to explain the color code somewhere. Ideas? I'll work on the template if there is consensus. — 1444:

uses a mix of geostationary, MEO and IGSO orbits to optimize coverage; however we need sources explaining that. —

428: 217: 2749:

Check the sums by orbit one more time please (last table), especially with failures. I think something wrong.

2414: 492:

IMHO, this information is too frequency changed. Very many sources its gossip from Reddit, twitter & etc.

412: 3016: 2962: 2935: 2904: 2882: 2801: 2754: 2723: 2699: 2631: 1963: 1959: 1605: 1539: 1215: 553: 2470: 2455: 2332: 2285: 2253: 2227: 2184: 2144: 2033: 1751: 1705: 1394: 1302: 1278:

I see that there's been already an edit with incorrect data, so let me give you a rationale for Electron:

996: 915: 882: 796: 579: 497: 471: 387: 303: 246: 2661: 2651: 1574:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

1354: 1263: 1180: 933: 863: 615: 456: 39: 1538:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 1140: 575: 493: 383: 355: 2609:

Hello. The sources say it was orbital launch (but not sub-orbital) on 27 July 2017, so the changes to

1202: 2406: 1892:

Meanwhile, I can suggest the following amendmend to the inclusion criteria for "landings" parameter:

1207: 787: 754: 2789:

I have found some interesting graphics from unknown author, confirming 91 launches in year, not 90.

2736:

Yes, thank you for this update. I will remove repeated world totals in the stats section, though. —

2403:

It's listed in Orbital launch statistics but I cannot find a reference to it in the article above.

2986: 2831: 2610: 2576: 2372: 1947: 1780: 1531: 1507: 1476: 1413: 506:

Precisely, that's a good reason for sourcing: blogs, tweets and forums are usually not accepted as

416: 332:

Note that we have another case coming up soon with Cartosat-2D and 82 cubesats flying on an Indian

280: 770:

I have restored the count to 786. Let me know if a different source requires changing it again. —

111:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

2794: 2792: 2790: 2539: 2534:

Can we delete the commented lines like unused rockets or spaceports after the end of the year? --

2432: 2299: 2129: 1720: 1497: 1480: 1112: 574:

launches. Also, many information about Russian launches publishing only by the Russian language.

223: 95: 2646: 1575: 1466: 2466: 2451: 2366: 2328: 2281: 2249: 2223: 2201: 2180: 2140: 2069:

The capsules have their own thrusters, just smaller. See my proposal to list actual reuses. --

2029: 1906: 1801: 1776: 1747: 1731: 1701: 1298: 792: 589: 534: 467: 404: 314: 299: 272: 242: 2389:

payload declaration. We can always tweak the colors if needed. Let me know what you think. —

2715: 2587: 1350: 1311:

Rocket Lab’s main engineering, design and mission control center is in Auckland, New Zealand

1259: 1248: 929: 859: 611: 452: 408: 219: 188: 1582: 1461: 717: 336:

on 27 January. ISRO hasn't even revealed which cubesats are flying except for 5 of them! —

2383: 2312: 1343: 1979:

This new definition should be unambiguous, but I'm not sure how useful it is as category.

691: 3001:

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

2167:

so that it would link to the correct article but that change was reversed by JFG. Why?

1455: 2982: 2572: 2139:

If it's removed from the source material, yes. If not, it can stay until/unless it is.

2011: 1955: 1951: 1026: 849: 633: 79: 52: 1581:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

827: 647:| launches = 785 3032: 2595: 2554: 2535: 2498: 2428: 2295: 2125: 2074: 2047: 1988: 1967: 1864: 1840: 1766: 1716: 1678: 1647: 1548:

https://web.archive.org/web/20161224000000/http://spaceflightnow.com/launch-schedule/

1493: 1373: 1332: 1231: 1108: 1091: 1066: 1030: 1022: 988: 958: 897: 811: 420: 2981:

from me. This is an excellent improvement to the timeline of spaceflight articles!

2645:

tracked orbiting following this launch. The previous catalogued orbital payload was

2571:

decision to split was made and why the 2011 is the cutoff for making this change? --

2109:

reuse of the same spacecraft?). This becomes counter-productive even for readers. —

665: 382:

Please excuse me. It was incorrect information from twitter. Tweet already deleted.

2718:

to July 2017 orbital launches. Check please if all statistics updates are correct.

2195: 2170: 1423: 1203:

https://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_Falcon_9_and_Falcon_Heavy_launches#Future_launches

607: 567: 507: 2674: 910:

Yes something special does happen. Did you even read my comment? 40th anniversary.

892:

The pages list events of 2017. Nothing special happens to Voyager 1 this year. --

2656: 2614: 2268: 1290: 786:

right approach? There is no precedent for a mission design like this except for

742: 398: 108: 221: 3024: 2990: 2966: 2952: 2939: 2921: 2908: 2886: 2855: 2846: 2815: 2805: 2776: 2758: 2740: 2727: 2703: 2669: 2635: 2621: 2602: 2580: 2558: 2543: 2523: 2502: 2474: 2459: 2436: 2418: 2393: 2336: 2322: 2303: 2289: 2275: 2257: 2242: 2231: 2208: 2188: 2173: 2148: 2133: 2113: 2078: 2064: 2051: 2037: 2018: 1992: 1974: 1868: 1854: 1844: 1830: 1770: 1755: 1740: 1724: 1715:

I was thinking that maybe is better to replace it with "Recovered boosters" --

1709: 1682: 1668: 1651: 1634: 1619: 1514: 1501: 1484: 1448: 1434: 1398: 1377: 1358: 1321: 1267: 1235: 1219: 1190: 1153: 1125: 1116: 1101: 1070: 1037: 1000: 962: 937: 919: 901: 886: 867: 815: 800: 774: 764: 619: 596: 583: 560: 514: 501: 485: 475: 460: 443: 437: 424: 391: 370: 340: 327: 307: 291: 260: 250: 238: 85: 1627: 1551: 2264: 1639: 1389:

it's listed as a US launch vehicle because ULA builds the rocket in the US.

924:

Anniversaries are not being listed of this series of articles. Only current

284: 155: 2686:

So, list this event as a failed orbital launch, please. Some other links:

1025:

in Knowledge; at any rate it won't help getting your point across. Please

2949: 2918: 2852: 2843: 2812: 2773: 2769: 2737: 2666: 2599: 2550: 2520: 2494: 2390: 2319: 2272: 2239: 2205: 2110: 2070: 2061: 2043: 2015: 1999: 1984: 1971: 1860: 1851: 1836: 1827: 1787:. So, let me suggest a criterion for inclusion in this "landings" field: 1762: 1737: 1674: 1665: 1658: 1643: 1631: 1511: 1445: 1431: 1369: 1227: 1187: 1161: 1150: 1122: 1098: 1062: 1034: 984: 954: 893: 807: 771: 761: 593: 557: 511: 434: 377: 367: 337: 324: 320: 288: 257: 641: 637: 1569:

An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

2160: 1889:

simulator handy. Better yet if we could find sources explaining that.

1886: 1441: 841: 2493:

include black, that would fit. Blue is not a national color of NZ.--

510:, so we need to avoid using them, and document the valid sources. — 610:

all together for planned launches is an absolute no-go in my book.

2899:

Maybe collapse all subsections by rocket to focus on graphs here?

2625:

Iranian official sources state that the rocket has reached orbit.

1901:

parameter documents the count of spacefaring vehicles which have:

1796:

parameter documents the count of spacefaring vehicles which have:

1293:

rocket due to the fact that its main body was manufactured in NZ (

1258:

See rationale below. Also please, remember to sign your comments.

1881:

would bring the Orbiter to space without the contribution of the

2997:

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

2665:

on July 28. Do we have other sources that covered this event? —

2618:

The first orbital attempt was launched in July 2017, but failed.

2006: 1882: 1427: 1404: 333: 276: 2862:

Very good work! Excellent! My best respects for high speed :-)

2375:

only. It's easy to apply the CubeSat formatting by just adding

1492:

The username inserted in the ping template is written wrong. --

1186:

tag after the reference to an outdated piece of information. —

2851:

I have now added the bar charts for years 2012–2017. Enjoy! —

224: 182: 15: 2427:

It was the Rokot / Briz-KM with Sentinel-5P on 13 October --

1467:

http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2017/06/files/20170615_h2af35_j.pdf

154: 2598:, as this article talk page is a more appropriate venue. — 1542:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

1510:. Yes, sorry I made a typo on your name the first time. — 2200:

My bad; I didn't check that the redirect existed. Thanks

1335:

flag due to the fact that it's HQ is based in California.

1316:

Therefore in Orbital launch summary it will count as a NZ

928:

of the spacecraft if they are important and rare enough.

1912:

re-entered Earth atmosphere and landed non-destructively

1807:

re-entered Earth atmosphere and landed non-destructively

1601:. Replace the reason with "helped" to mark as answered. 1462:

http://global.jaxa.jp/press/2017/06/20170615_h2af35.html

466:

sources, just note which one it is in the edit summary.

2486: 1535: 1419: 1146: 757: 590:

Template:Cite web#Foreign language and translated title

362: 1457:

JAXA press release says Michibiki-3 is geostationary.

1029:

to what others have to say about your suggestions and

2465:

Probably just an error while copy-pasting templates.

2399:

Did Russia launch a UR-100 Universal Rocket in 2017?

1149:

The quoted source hasn't moved those flights yet. —

107:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 541: 1909:, at least partly by their own means of propulsion 2308:That can surely be done by adding a parameter to 760:. Why the discrepancy? What are your sources? — 588:That's OK, we can refer to Russian sources, see 363:scheduling the second Iridium flight to April 10 3049:Timeline of spaceflight working group articles 3011:Participate in the deletion discussion at the 1895: 1790: 8: 556:, and it seems pretty light to implement. — 275:! I was about to erase all the flags on the 2684:that no satellite deployed from the rocket. 2404: 1628:http://spaceflightnow.com/launch-schedule/ 1552:http://spaceflightnow.com/launch-schedule/ 1530:I have just modified one external link on 1205: 1174:List of Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy launches 47: 21: 19: 1673:No idea, I didn't look into the issue. -- 636:will be the last flight of the venerable 166:the timeline of spaceflight working group 1085:Sources for planned suborbital flights? 656: 49: 2376: 2056: 548:and add quick references in the form 7: 3044:High-importance spaceflight articles 2835: 101:This article is within the scope of 2834:I think the result is pretty neat. 2714:I have added the information about 2565:Zenit/Dnepr now categorized as Ukr? 1176:the issue was resolved by adding a 552:. This would go a long way towards 549: 38:It is of interest to the following 2155:SLC-46 does not link to an article 1201:Is now scheduled for late June. - 1134:Source for Falcon schedule change? 758:counted 789 flights instead of 786 14: 2481:Blue colors in "by country" chart 1534:. Please take a moment to review 121:Knowledge:WikiProject Spaceflight 3054:WikiProject Spaceflight articles 2976: 2873: 2868: 2863: 2836: 2821: 2772:stuck in MEO). Yay, teamwork! — 2510: 2355: 1804:by their own means of propulsion 1589: 1560: 1326: 1284: 848: 840: 826: 484: 442: 187: 124:Template:WikiProject Spaceflight 88: 78: 51: 20: 3039:List-Class spaceflight articles 2491:National colours of New Zealand 1664:whitelist visible somewhere? — 570:criteria is not applicable for 237:So with the expected launch of 141:This article has been rated as 2768:orbits: 85 ok + 1 accidental ( 1: 2581:19:17, 29 December 2017 (UTC) 2559:01:59, 26 December 2017 (UTC) 2544:22:48, 25 December 2017 (UTC) 2057:Things that reach space, but… 1826:spacefaring editors think? — 1785:Falcon 9 first-stage landings 1506:Many thanks for the sources, 1346:to keep the convention going. 868:10:22, 22 February 2017 (UTC) 816:15:26, 22 February 2017 (UTC) 801:22:43, 21 February 2017 (UTC) 775:21:32, 15 February 2017 (UTC) 765:10:16, 14 February 2017 (UTC) 341:21:22, 20 December 2016 (UTC) 328:21:19, 20 December 2016 (UTC) 163:This article is supported by 115:and see a list of open tasks. 3025:23:54, 8 February 2019 (UTC) 2991:20:28, 13 January 2019 (UTC) 2796:Could we build such graphs? 2524:10:28, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 2503:08:30, 1 November 2017 (UTC) 2475:04:08, 25 October 2017 (UTC) 2460:01:54, 25 October 2017 (UTC) 2437:18:57, 19 October 2017 (UTC) 2419:12:12, 19 October 2017 (UTC) 2124:from Suborbital launches? -- 1338:By spaceport list will have 648:| success = 764 | fail = 22 620:10:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC) 597:17:39, 8 February 2017 (UTC) 584:17:03, 8 February 2017 (UTC) 561:16:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC) 515:16:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC) 502:08:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC) 476:15:47, 7 February 2017 (UTC) 461:11:20, 7 February 2017 (UTC) 438:07:30, 7 February 2017 (UTC) 392:04:33, 7 February 2017 (UTC) 371:22:25, 6 February 2017 (UTC) 308:17:26, 7 December 2016 (UTC) 292:17:19, 7 December 2016 (UTC) 261:17:21, 7 December 2016 (UTC) 251:14:59, 3 November 2016 (UTC) 2337:01:18, 18 August 2017 (UTC) 2323:22:25, 17 August 2017 (UTC) 2304:15:43, 17 August 2017 (UTC) 2290:13:41, 17 August 2017 (UTC) 2276:06:37, 17 August 2017 (UTC) 2258:00:25, 17 August 2017 (UTC) 2243:18:29, 16 August 2017 (UTC) 2232:18:01, 16 August 2017 (UTC) 1384:Electron Rocket vs. Engines 1340:Rocket Lab Launch Complex 1 1021:Insulting other editors is 3070: 2530:Remove the commented lines 2209:17:12, 8 August 2017 (UTC) 2189:13:41, 8 August 2017 (UTC) 2174:13:17, 8 August 2017 (UTC) 1527:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 1126:08:43, 22 March 2017 (UTC) 1117:06:07, 22 March 2017 (UTC) 1102:20:43, 21 March 2017 (UTC) 1071:10:26, 10 March 2017 (UTC) 1038:08:39, 10 March 2017 (UTC) 1001:01:43, 10 March 2017 (UTC) 718:"Soyuz-U Fregat (11A511U)" 147:project's importance scale 2967:17:37, 8 April 2018 (UTC) 2953:17:11, 8 April 2018 (UTC) 2940:16:37, 8 April 2018 (UTC) 2922:17:11, 8 April 2018 (UTC) 2909:16:32, 8 April 2018 (UTC) 2887:15:58, 8 April 2018 (UTC) 2856:11:51, 8 April 2018 (UTC) 2847:10:36, 8 April 2018 (UTC) 2816:06:58, 8 April 2018 (UTC) 2806:03:18, 8 April 2018 (UTC) 2777:17:52, 8 April 2018 (UTC) 2759:03:23, 8 April 2018 (UTC) 2741:22:22, 7 April 2018 (UTC) 2728:21:33, 7 April 2018 (UTC) 2704:21:17, 2 April 2018 (UTC) 2670:06:41, 2 April 2018 (UTC) 2649:-IK on July 14 as COSPAR 2636:02:49, 2 April 2018 (UTC) 2603:06:41, 2 April 2018 (UTC) 2394:17:02, 8 April 2018 (UTC) 2248:to deleting the entries. 2114:12:33, 10 July 2017 (UTC) 2079:10:00, 10 July 2017 (UTC) 1652:23:59, 24 June 2017 (UTC) 1635:23:09, 23 June 2017 (UTC) 1620:06:33, 22 June 2017 (UTC) 1515:18:22, 24 June 2017 (UTC) 1502:07:52, 24 June 2017 (UTC) 1485:04:44, 24 June 2017 (UTC) 1449:18:00, 18 June 2017 (UTC) 1435:17:56, 18 June 2017 (UTC) 1145:Do you have a source for 963:14:51, 8 March 2017 (UTC) 938:13:25, 8 March 2017 (UTC) 920:05:57, 8 March 2017 (UTC) 902:08:37, 6 March 2017 (UTC) 887:02:23, 6 March 2017 (UTC) 836:new stakeholder structure 550:<ref name="sfn" /: --> 401:of planned launch dates? 360:Do you have a source for 162: 140: 73: 46: 2327:That's a fine solution. 2149:14:15, 7 July 2017 (UTC) 2134:14:10, 7 July 2017 (UTC) 2065:21:00, 9 July 2017 (UTC) 2052:20:06, 9 July 2017 (UTC) 2038:19:34, 9 July 2017 (UTC) 2019:19:05, 9 July 2017 (UTC) 1993:10:50, 9 July 2017 (UTC) 1975:10:44, 9 July 2017 (UTC) 1869:21:18, 8 July 2017 (UTC) 1855:03:43, 8 July 2017 (UTC) 1845:00:26, 8 July 2017 (UTC) 1831:00:19, 8 July 2017 (UTC) 1771:00:13, 8 July 2017 (UTC) 1756:19:01, 7 July 2017 (UTC) 1741:16:04, 7 July 2017 (UTC) 1725:13:55, 7 July 2017 (UTC) 1710:13:49, 7 July 2017 (UTC) 1683:11:10, 7 July 2017 (UTC) 1669:05:39, 7 July 2017 (UTC) 1597:A help request is open: 1399:16:41, 25 May 2017 (UTC) 1378:19:24, 25 May 2017 (UTC) 1359:07:57, 25 May 2017 (UTC) 1268:08:02, 25 May 2017 (UTC) 1236:13:35, 13 May 2017 (UTC) 1220:07:41, 12 May 2017 (UTC) 692:"Soyuz-U Ikar (11A511U)" 3006:2017 in spaceflight.png 2655:, and the next one was 1523:External links modified 1226:Moved it up, thanks. -- 1191:13:11, 5 May 2017 (UTC) 1154:18:42, 4 May 2017 (UTC) 104:WikiProject Spaceflight 64:Timeline of spaceflight 1915: 1810: 1303:Talk:Electron (rocket) 628:Last flight of Soyuz-U 159: 28:This article is rated 1958:in 1963, and flights 1023:considered disruptive 634:next Progress mission 433:What do you think? — 158: 2594:Comment copied from 429:Galactic Penguin SST 127:spaceflight articles 2611:2017 in spaceflight 2373:2018 in spaceflight 1873:Right. Dragon does 1781:2017 in spaceflight 1532:2017 in spaceflight 856:201X in spaceflight 722:Gunter's space page 696:Gunter's space page 670:Gunter's Space Page 666:"Soyuz-U (11A511U)" 281:2017 in spaceflight 233:Lunar Sample Return 3017:Community Tech bot 1630:on a whitelist? — 1608:InternetArchiveBot 1274:Electron rationale 413:Grounded Cosmonaut 160: 96:Spaceflight portal 34:content assessment 2605: 2445:Telesat Flag icon 2421: 2409:comment added by 1307:additional source 1299:Electron (rocket) 1222: 1210:comment added by 230: 229: 211: 210: 181: 180: 177: 176: 173: 172: 3061: 2980: 2979: 2877: 2876: 2872: 2871: 2867: 2866: 2841: 2840: 2839: 2829: 2825: 2824: 2716:Simorgh (rocket) 2664: 2654: 2613:are needed. See 2593: 2588:Simorgh (rocket) 2518: 2514: 2513: 2487:here in the past 2388: 2382: 2378: 2370: 2363: 2359: 2358: 2317: 2311: 2217:CubeSat Payloads 2199: 2003: 1735: 1662: 1618: 1609: 1596: 1593: 1592: 1567: 1564: 1563: 1471: 1417: 1367: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1282:It counts as an 1252: 1185: 1179: 1165: 1144: 1095: 853: 852: 845: 844: 830: 822:Arianespace flag 746: 741:In 1983, flight 739: 733: 732: 730: 728: 713: 707: 706: 704: 702: 687: 681: 680: 678: 676: 661: 554:WP:Verifiability 551: 543: 538: 488: 446: 432: 381: 365: 359: 318: 225: 202: 201: 191: 183: 129: 128: 125: 122: 119: 98: 93: 92: 91: 82: 75: 74: 69: 66: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 23: 16: 3069: 3068: 3064: 3063: 3062: 3060: 3059: 3058: 3029: 3028: 3013:nomination page 2999: 2977: 2975:A very belated 2874: 2869: 2864: 2837: 2822: 2820: 2787: 2660: 2650: 2591: 2567: 2532: 2511: 2509: 2483: 2447: 2401: 2386: 2380: 2364: 2356: 2354: 2315: 2309: 2219: 2193: 2157: 2121: 1997: 1729: 1697: 1656: 1612: 1607: 1594: 1590: 1565: 1561: 1540:this simple FaQ 1525: 1469: 1411: 1409: 1386: 1365: 1327: 1325: 1285: 1283: 1276: 1246: 1244: 1199: 1183: 1177: 1159: 1138: 1136: 1089: 1087: 875: 847: 839: 824: 783: 751: 750: 749: 740: 736: 726: 724: 716:Krebs, Gunter. 715: 714: 710: 700: 698: 690:Krebs, Gunter. 689: 688: 684: 674: 672: 664:Krebs, Gunter. 663: 662: 658: 649: 630: 546:Spaceflight Now 532: 402: 399:WP:Verification 375: 361: 353: 351: 312: 269: 235: 226: 220: 196: 143:High-importance 126: 123: 120: 117: 116: 94: 89: 87: 68:High‑importance 67: 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 3067: 3065: 3057: 3056: 3051: 3046: 3041: 3031: 3030: 3009: 3008: 2998: 2995: 2994: 2993: 2973: 2972: 2971: 2970: 2969: 2943: 2942: 2927: 2926: 2925: 2924: 2912: 2911: 2896: 2895: 2894: 2893: 2892: 2891: 2890: 2889: 2849: 2786: 2783: 2782: 2781: 2780: 2779: 2762: 2761: 2746: 2745: 2744: 2743: 2731: 2730: 2711: 2710: 2709: 2708: 2707: 2706: 2639: 2638: 2590: 2585: 2584: 2583: 2566: 2563: 2562: 2561: 2531: 2528: 2527: 2526: 2482: 2479: 2478: 2477: 2446: 2443: 2442: 2441: 2440: 2439: 2411:149.238.52.134 2400: 2397: 2352: 2351: 2350: 2349: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2340: 2339: 2218: 2215: 2214: 2213: 2212: 2211: 2156: 2153: 2152: 2151: 2120: 2119:XCOR Aerospace 2117: 2106: 2105: 2104: 2103: 2102: 2101: 2100: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2095: 2094: 2093: 2092: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2088: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2012:ITS spacecraft 1980: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1928: 1927: 1926: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1914: 1913: 1910: 1890: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1811: 1809: 1808: 1805: 1773: 1727: 1696: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1587: 1586: 1579: 1555: 1554: 1546:Added archive 1524: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1504: 1473: 1472: 1464: 1452: 1451: 1408: 1402: 1385: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1348: 1347: 1336: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1275: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1243: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1198: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1135: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1086: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1045: 1044: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1010: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1004: 1003: 981: 970: 969: 968: 967: 966: 965: 945: 944: 943: 942: 941: 940: 905: 904: 874: 871: 823: 820: 819: 818: 782: 781:Juno Perijoves 779: 778: 777: 748: 747: 734: 708: 682: 655: 654: 650: 646: 644:, as follows: 629: 626: 625: 624: 623: 622: 599: 530: 529: 528: 527: 526: 525: 524: 523: 522: 521: 520: 519: 518: 517: 350: 347: 346: 345: 344: 343: 330: 268: 265: 264: 263: 234: 231: 228: 227: 222: 218: 216: 213: 212: 209: 208: 198: 197: 192: 186: 179: 178: 175: 174: 171: 170: 161: 151: 150: 139: 133: 132: 130: 113:the discussion 100: 99: 83: 71: 70: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3066: 3055: 3052: 3050: 3047: 3045: 3042: 3040: 3037: 3036: 3034: 3027: 3026: 3022: 3018: 3014: 3007: 3004: 3003: 3002: 2996: 2992: 2988: 2984: 2974: 2968: 2964: 2960: 2959:91.124.117.29 2956: 2955: 2954: 2951: 2947: 2946: 2945: 2944: 2941: 2937: 2933: 2932:91.124.117.29 2929: 2928: 2923: 2920: 2916: 2915: 2914: 2913: 2910: 2906: 2902: 2901:91.124.117.29 2898: 2897: 2888: 2884: 2880: 2879:91.124.117.29 2861: 2860: 2859: 2858: 2857: 2854: 2850: 2848: 2845: 2833: 2828: 2819: 2818: 2817: 2814: 2810: 2809: 2808: 2807: 2803: 2799: 2798:91.124.117.29 2795: 2793: 2791: 2784: 2778: 2775: 2771: 2766: 2765: 2764: 2763: 2760: 2756: 2752: 2751:91.124.117.29 2748: 2747: 2742: 2739: 2735: 2734: 2733: 2732: 2729: 2725: 2721: 2720:91.124.117.29 2717: 2713: 2712: 2705: 2701: 2697: 2696:91.124.117.29 2694: 2692: 2690: 2688: 2685: 2680: 2676: 2675:MissileThreat 2673: 2672: 2671: 2668: 2663: 2658: 2653: 2648: 2643: 2642: 2641: 2640: 2637: 2633: 2629: 2628:91.124.117.29 2626: 2622: 2619: 2615: 2612: 2608: 2607: 2606: 2604: 2601: 2597: 2596:User Talk:JFG 2589: 2586: 2582: 2578: 2574: 2569: 2568: 2564: 2560: 2556: 2552: 2548: 2547: 2546: 2545: 2541: 2537: 2529: 2525: 2522: 2517: 2507: 2506: 2505: 2504: 2500: 2496: 2492: 2488: 2480: 2476: 2472: 2468: 2464: 2463: 2462: 2461: 2457: 2453: 2444: 2438: 2434: 2430: 2426: 2425: 2424: 2423: 2422: 2420: 2416: 2412: 2408: 2398: 2396: 2395: 2392: 2385: 2374: 2368: 2362: 2338: 2334: 2330: 2326: 2325: 2324: 2321: 2314: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2301: 2297: 2293: 2292: 2291: 2287: 2283: 2279: 2278: 2277: 2274: 2270: 2266: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2255: 2251: 2246: 2245: 2244: 2241: 2236: 2235: 2234: 2233: 2229: 2225: 2216: 2210: 2207: 2203: 2197: 2192: 2191: 2190: 2186: 2182: 2178: 2177: 2176: 2175: 2172: 2168: 2166: 2162: 2154: 2150: 2146: 2142: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2131: 2127: 2118: 2116: 2115: 2112: 2080: 2076: 2072: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2063: 2058: 2055: 2054: 2053: 2049: 2045: 2041: 2040: 2039: 2035: 2031: 2026: 2022: 2021: 2020: 2017: 2013: 2008: 2001: 1996: 1995: 1994: 1990: 1986: 1981: 1978: 1977: 1976: 1973: 1969: 1968:Spaceship One 1965: 1961: 1957: 1953: 1949: 1945: 1944: 1943: 1942: 1941: 1940: 1939: 1938: 1937: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1933: 1932: 1911: 1908: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1900: 1894: 1893: 1891: 1888: 1884: 1880: 1876: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1866: 1862: 1858: 1857: 1856: 1853: 1848: 1847: 1846: 1842: 1838: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1829: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1821: 1820: 1819: 1806: 1803: 1799: 1798: 1797: 1795: 1789: 1788: 1786: 1782: 1778: 1774: 1772: 1768: 1764: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1753: 1749: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1739: 1733: 1728: 1726: 1722: 1718: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1711: 1707: 1703: 1694: 1684: 1680: 1676: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1667: 1660: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1649: 1645: 1641: 1638: 1637: 1636: 1633: 1629: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1616: 1611: 1610: 1602: 1600: 1584: 1580: 1577: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1558: 1553: 1549: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1528: 1522: 1516: 1513: 1509: 1505: 1503: 1499: 1495: 1491: 1490: 1489: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1482: 1478: 1470:(in Japanese) 1468: 1465: 1463: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1456: 1450: 1447: 1443: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1433: 1429: 1425: 1424:Tundra orbits 1421: 1415: 1406: 1403: 1401: 1400: 1396: 1392: 1383: 1379: 1375: 1371: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1356: 1352: 1345: 1342:on a list as 1341: 1337: 1334: 1333:United States 1323: 1320: 1315: 1314: 1312: 1308: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1292: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1261: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1250: 1241: 1237: 1233: 1229: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1221: 1217: 1213: 1209: 1204: 1196: 1192: 1189: 1182: 1175: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1163: 1156: 1155: 1152: 1148: 1142: 1133: 1127: 1124: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1114: 1110: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1103: 1100: 1093: 1084: 1072: 1068: 1064: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1054: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1039: 1036: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1020: 1019: 1018: 1017: 1016: 1015: 1014: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1002: 998: 994: 990: 986: 982: 978: 977: 976: 975: 974: 973: 972: 971: 964: 960: 956: 951: 950: 949: 948: 947: 946: 939: 935: 931: 927: 923: 922: 921: 917: 913: 909: 908: 907: 906: 903: 899: 895: 891: 890: 889: 888: 884: 880: 872: 870: 869: 865: 861: 857: 851: 843: 837: 833: 829: 821: 817: 813: 809: 805: 804: 803: 802: 798: 794: 789: 780: 776: 773: 769: 768: 767: 766: 763: 759: 756: 744: 738: 735: 723: 719: 712: 709: 697: 693: 686: 683: 671: 667: 660: 657: 653: 645: 643: 639: 635: 627: 621: 617: 613: 609: 605: 600: 598: 595: 591: 587: 586: 585: 581: 577: 573: 569: 565: 564: 563: 562: 559: 555: 547: 536: 516: 513: 509: 505: 504: 503: 499: 495: 491: 487: 483: 482: 481: 480: 479: 478: 477: 473: 469: 464: 463: 462: 458: 454: 449: 445: 441: 440: 439: 436: 430: 426: 422: 418: 414: 410: 406: 400: 396: 395: 394: 393: 389: 385: 379: 373: 372: 369: 364: 357: 348: 342: 339: 335: 331: 329: 326: 322: 316: 311: 310: 309: 305: 301: 296: 295: 294: 293: 290: 286: 282: 278: 274: 266: 262: 259: 255: 254: 253: 252: 248: 244: 240: 232: 215: 214: 207: 204: 203: 200: 199: 195: 190: 185: 184: 168: 167: 157: 153: 152: 148: 144: 138: 135: 134: 131: 114: 110: 106: 105: 97: 86: 84: 81: 77: 76: 72: 65: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 18: 17: 3010: 3000: 2957:It's clear. 2832:Take a look. 2826: 2788: 2785:Extra graphs 2682: 2624: 2617: 2592: 2533: 2515: 2508:Great idea. 2484: 2467:Astrofreak92 2452:Andrewpullin 2448: 2405:— Preceding 2402: 2377:|cubesat=yes 2367:Astrofreak92 2360: 2353: 2329:Astrofreak92 2282:Astrofreak92 2250:Astrofreak92 2224:Astrofreak92 2220: 2202:Astrofreak92 2181:Astrofreak92 2171:user:mnw2000 2169: 2158: 2141:Astrofreak92 2122: 2107: 2030:Astrofreak92 2024: 1905:crossed the 1898: 1896: 1878: 1874: 1800:crossed the 1793: 1791: 1748:Astrofreak92 1732:Astrofreak92 1702:Astrofreak92 1698: 1606: 1603: 1598: 1588: 1568: 1559: 1556: 1529: 1526: 1474: 1453: 1410: 1391:192.55.54.38 1387: 1349: 1324:will have a 1310: 1297:) and well, 1277: 1245: 1212:84.63.169.76 1206:— Preceding 1200: 1197:Intelsat 35e 1181:needs update 1157: 1147:this change? 1141:NikitaStupin 1137: 1088: 993:24.44.69.250 925: 912:24.44.69.250 879:24.44.69.250 876: 855: 832:New proposal 831: 825: 793:Astrofreak92 784: 752: 737: 725:. Retrieved 721: 711: 699:. Retrieved 695: 685: 673:. Retrieved 669: 659: 651: 631: 603: 576:NikitaStupin 571: 545: 535:Astrofreak92 531: 494:NikitaStupin 489: 468:Astrofreak92 447: 405:Astrofreak92 384:NikitaStupin 374: 356:NikitaStupin 352: 315:Astrofreak92 300:Astrofreak92 273:Astrofreak92 270: 243:Astrofreak92 236: 193: 164: 142: 102: 40:WikiProjects 2657:Soyuz MS-05 2269:Cartosat-2C 1907:Kármán line 1802:Kármán line 1777:Kármán line 1351:SkywalkerPL 1291:New Zealand 1260:SkywalkerPL 1249:SkywalkerPL 930:SkywalkerPL 860:SkywalkerPL 743:Soyuz T-10a 675:20 December 612:SkywalkerPL 453:SkywalkerPL 409:SkywalkerPL 118:Spaceflight 109:spaceflight 59:Spaceflight 3033:Categories 2265:COSPAR IDs 2159:I changed 1640:Bug report 1615:Report bug 1322:Rocket Lab 926:happenings 858:articles. 834:Given the 755:Baazaar121 652:References 271:Greetings 30:List-class 2983:IanOsgood 2662:2017-043A 2652:2017-042A 2647:Kanopus-V 2573:IanOsgood 1952:flight 90 1695:Landings? 1583:this tool 1576:this tool 1420:this edit 1305:. (edit: 983:Nice one 873:Voyager 1 285:NanoRacks 279:entry at 239:Chang'e 5 206:Archive 1 2770:IRNSS-1H 2536:Rikifire 2429:Rikifire 2407:unsigned 2296:Rikifire 2126:Rikifire 2025:Option B 2023:I think 1899:landings 1794:landings 1717:Rikifire 1604:Cheers.— 1508:Fukumoto 1494:Rikifire 1477:Fukumoto 1414:Fukumuto 1242:Electron 1208:unsigned 1109:Rikifire 1092:Rikifire 572:planning 566:I think 490:Disagree 448:Disagree 421:Rikifire 417:Fukumoto 349:Sourcing 321:MOS:FLAG 194:Archives 2679:FoxNews 2620:Video: 2379:to the 2196:Mnw2000 1536:my edit 788:Ulysses 642:Soyuz-U 638:Soyuz U 604:sources 427:, and 145:on the 2384:TLS-PL 2313:TLS-PL 2165:SLC-46 2161:SLC-46 1887:Kerbal 1442:BeiDou 1407:orbits 1031:WP:AGF 1027:listen 753:Today 36:scale. 1950:with 1883:SSMEs 1879:alone 1418:With 1344:Mahia 980:that. 727:7 May 701:7 May 608:WP:RS 568:WP:RS 508:WP:RS 425:Ohsin 3021:talk 2987:talk 2963:talk 2936:talk 2905:talk 2883:talk 2827:Done 2802:talk 2755:talk 2724:talk 2700:talk 2677:and 2632:talk 2577:talk 2555:talk 2540:talk 2516:Done 2499:talk 2471:talk 2456:talk 2433:talk 2415:talk 2361:Done 2333:talk 2300:talk 2286:talk 2254:talk 2228:talk 2204:. — 2185:talk 2145:talk 2130:talk 2075:talk 2048:talk 2034:talk 2007:SSTO 1989:talk 1954:and 1948:X-15 1897:The 1865:talk 1841:talk 1792:The 1767:talk 1752:talk 1721:talk 1706:talk 1679:talk 1648:talk 1642:? -- 1599:true 1498:talk 1481:talk 1428:QZSS 1405:QZSS 1395:talk 1374:talk 1368:? -- 1355:talk 1264:talk 1232:talk 1216:talk 1113:talk 1067:talk 1033:. — 997:talk 989:talk 959:talk 934:talk 916:talk 898:talk 883:talk 864:talk 812:talk 797:talk 729:2016 703:2016 677:2016 632:The 616:talk 592:. — 580:talk 544:for 498:talk 472:talk 457:talk 388:talk 334:PSLV 323:. — 304:talk 277:QB50 267:QB50 247:talk 137:High 3015:. — 2950:JFG 2919:JFG 2853:JFG 2844:JFG 2813:JFG 2774:JFG 2738:JFG 2667:JFG 2659:as 2600:JFG 2551:mfb 2521:JFG 2495:mfb 2391:JFG 2320:JFG 2273:JFG 2240:JFG 2206:JFG 2163:to 2111:JFG 2071:mfb 2062:JFG 2044:mfb 2016:JFG 2000:Mfb 1985:mfb 1972:JFG 1966:of 1964:17P 1962:to 1960:15P 1875:not 1861:mfb 1852:JFG 1837:mfb 1828:JFG 1763:mfb 1738:JFG 1675:mfb 1666:JFG 1659:Mfb 1644:mfb 1632:JFG 1550:to 1512:JFG 1446:JFG 1432:JFG 1370:mfb 1313:") 1228:mfb 1188:JFG 1162:JFG 1151:JFG 1123:JFG 1099:JFG 1063:mfb 1035:JFG 985:mfb 955:mfb 894:mfb 846:to 808:mfb 772:JFG 762:JFG 594:JFG 558:JFG 542:sfn 512:JFG 435:JFG 378:JFG 368:JFG 338:JFG 325:JFG 289:JFG 258:JFG 3035:: 3023:) 2989:) 2965:) 2938:) 2907:) 2885:) 2842:— 2830:. 2804:) 2757:) 2726:) 2702:) 2681:: 2634:) 2623:: 2616:: 2579:) 2557:) 2542:) 2519:— 2501:) 2473:) 2458:) 2435:) 2417:) 2387:}} 2381:{{ 2335:) 2316:}} 2310:{{ 2302:) 2288:) 2256:) 2230:) 2222:-- 2187:) 2147:) 2132:) 2077:) 2050:) 2036:) 1991:) 1983:-- 1956:91 1867:) 1843:) 1769:) 1761:-- 1754:) 1723:) 1708:) 1681:) 1650:) 1500:) 1483:) 1475:-- 1397:) 1376:) 1366:__ 1357:) 1266:) 1234:) 1218:) 1184:}} 1178:{{ 1158:→ 1115:) 1069:) 999:) 961:) 953:-- 936:) 918:) 900:) 885:) 866:) 814:) 799:) 720:. 694:. 668:. 618:) 582:) 500:) 474:) 459:) 423:, 419:, 415:, 411:, 407:, 390:) 306:) 249:) 62:: 3019:( 2985:( 2961:( 2934:( 2903:( 2881:( 2800:( 2753:( 2722:( 2698:( 2630:( 2575:( 2553:( 2538:( 2497:( 2469:( 2454:( 2431:( 2413:( 2369:: 2365:@ 2331:( 2298:( 2284:( 2252:( 2226:( 2198:: 2194:@ 2183:( 2143:( 2128:( 2073:( 2046:( 2032:( 2002:: 1998:@ 1987:( 1863:( 1839:( 1765:( 1750:( 1734:: 1730:@ 1719:( 1704:( 1677:( 1661:: 1657:@ 1646:( 1617:) 1613:( 1595:? 1585:. 1578:. 1566:Y 1496:( 1479:( 1416:: 1412:@ 1393:( 1372:( 1353:( 1309:" 1262:( 1251:: 1247:@ 1230:( 1214:( 1164:: 1160:@ 1143:: 1139:@ 1111:( 1094:: 1090:@ 1065:( 995:( 987:( 957:( 932:( 914:( 896:( 881:( 862:( 810:( 795:( 731:. 705:. 679:. 614:( 578:( 537:: 533:@ 496:( 470:( 455:( 431:: 403:@ 386:( 380:: 376:@ 358:: 354:@ 317:: 313:@ 302:( 245:( 169:. 149:. 42::

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index