Talk:2014 Crimean status referendum/Archive 1

1201:

since been inserted by others between his or her prediction and my reply here). But in terms of what is likely to happen, whether the treaty is legally binding or not is largely irrelevant, as is the abstract morality of the issue, US policy on the rather different issue of North Korea, and the position of the UK government. The US (and/or elements within it, such as Cold Warriors within the CIA, arms traders, etc) is perfectly capable of trying to start a guerrilla war in the Ukraine and/or the Crimea, and/or anywhere else it thinks Russia might be punishable (Chechnya, Dagestan, etc), and/or supporting and arming a guerrilla war that had been started by locals, if it (and/or elements within it) reckon that has become necessary to protect the credibility of its NATO guarantees (particularly the guarantees to the Baltic states, NATO members with many similarities to non-NATO Ukraine) following a breakup of the US-guaranteed territorial integrity of the Ukraine (which is what a Crimean secession would be, at least in American eyes which is what matters in this particular context, regardless of the rights and wrongs of such a secession). The US has frequently supported guerrilla wars in the past (as its Soviet adversary also did) and there's not much evidence that the cost of such guerrilla wars was or is deemed unacceptable by those who started and/or supported them (as distinct from the unfortunate local peoples who paid the price). This may even happen if Obama doesn't want it (For instance, Reagan at least claimed that he was largely in the dark about much of the Iran-Contra affair, and it's at least possible that he was telling the truth). Whether it will choose to do so on this occasion is not something Wiki editors can reliably predict, but the risk seems to be there and seems worth noting. Incidentally, history is littered with wars that happened because one side deluded itself the other side would not or could not respond effectively, arguably including parts of both World Wars.

584:

worried about the Russians than the Ukrainians). And it's unclear what the implications are for Russian speakers in the rest of the Ukraine, and perhaps elsewhere such as the Baltic states, where the issue is arguably potentially even more dangerous as they are already in the EU and NATO, unlike the Ukraine. However the West did guarantee Ukraine's territorial integrity by treaty in the 1990s when Ukraine agreed to give up the nukes it inherited from the USSR, so any failure of the West to protect that territorial integrity would presumably weaken the credibility of NATO's other promises, including the promises of mutual defence that are the basis for NATO's existence, so the West seemingly can't easily just turn a blind eye to the break-up of Ukraine even if it wants to do so. But it's not clear whether Putin and/or Obama see it that way, and whether or not either is prepared to risk a new Cold War (or worse?) if they do see it that way. And so on. But as usual none of that can appear in this article unless somebody can find reliable sources to back it up.

656:

not. What about infrastructure, geography, cultural ties with neighbor? You have not even a basic understanding. Another quote: "The general Crimean population has decided it wants a referendum on whether it no longer wishes to honor that agreement and whether its people want to rejoin the Russian federation." What??? When the "general Crimean population requested the referendum? Was it right after the forceful installation of the Kremlin "puppets" in Crimea? The fact that US and UK tries to avoid it, it is apparent, I agree. However, do you realize what consequences it carries? Ukraine was the third biggest nuclear power in the world and the United States were spending $ 10 billion a year to keep that power in check. When the Budapest memorandum will be thrown to the wind, how does that help to prevent proliferation of nuclear weapon, what will happen with a trust in the Western powers, and what will happen with trust of any international treaties and borders?

574:

repudiate agreements and treaties and leave the union should it wish. I think that most or all of the Union Republics of the USSR declared themselves sovereign in early 1991, and after initial opposition Gorbachov eventually tried to bring in a new USSR constitution that recognised this. A few months after the failure of a hardline coup in August 1991, supposedly intended to prevent the breakup of the USSR by preventing the adoption of that Gorbachov Constitution, the main republics decided to leave the USSR (or rather to abolish it) at the end of 1991. Presumably all this is well understood in Moscow, Kiev, and Simferopol, and it should probably be explained to our readers in this article. But this can't be done unless somebody can find reliable sources that say this (after all, it's just my interpretation, and it could be wrong).

1250:

one who is talking about the risk of war is Stephen Cohen, who is is professor emeritus of Russian Studies and Politics at New York University and Princeton University. He says "I think we're two steps from a Cuban Missile Crisis and three steps from war with Russia for the first time." However his reasons are not those mentioned in our discussions above, but are concern that the West is ignoring Putin's concerns, and has sent aircraft to Poland and may thus end up provoking a Russian move into some other parts of Ukraine. So one of the other articles on the crisis may be a more appropriate place to use it. I'm not sufficiently interested to do so, but I'm mentioning it here in case anybody else is. Also I expect there are many similar articles out there if anybody is interested in looking for them (I'm not).

1086:

territory and that includes maintaining influence in states and territories largely that have supported the Russian position including the Ukraine and other nations that Russia would otherwise consider "buffer zone" nations. Likewise the west has a great deal of interest in supporting regimes such as the current Ukrainian government that would break this down. There is a lot of value in understanding that it has been nothing more than a coup in Venezuela and now in the Ukraine from Western powers via guerrilla tactics to install pro western governments and that the former Ukrainian president was deposed simply on the basis that he chose to support Western interests rather than Russia. Do you understand anything about cold war geostrategic politics here or am I simply talking to myself? --

1564:

the referendum is even more complex because it's seeking SECESSION (from Ukraine) followed immediately by ANNEXATION (into Russia). So you have two international matters going on at the same time. My guess is that typically (notice I said typically, not always) when a region wants to annex another country they would request first to secede then, while seceded, request to annex. Or if they want to annex they would request permission to conduct a referendum from the national authorities. But this thing is looking to do both at the very same time without the express authorization of Kiev. Confusing isn't it? —

1010:, it seems that you are questioning my knowledge of the Crimean history. Is that right? Do you actually know what happened on February 19, 1954? What were pretenses of transferring Crimea to Ukraine or you believe the nonsense about the "symbolic gesture". That is a Kremlin propaganda. Note, who only talks about it. How else would Kremlin contest the territory? Do you really believe that the people of Crimea want to become independent from Ukraine? Crimea is being raided by the Kremlin. That is all. Look at their Prime Minister. He was elected from the least popular political party in the 621:

decades. David Cameron and Barrack Obama are not that stupid, whether or not you agree with them politically or otherwise. IF the US wont touch North Korea beyond the demilitarised zone there is no sensible logic that can convince anyone they will do anything other than sanction Russia for their recent escapades and Russia simply doesn't care no less is it really affected by western diplomacy when in return it can simply decide if it likes to stop shipping petrol to Europe and turn off its gas lines, or any other amount of options in return --

767:? Which by the way was built after transferring of Crimea to Ukraine, not when it was part of Russia. Do you know that gas transportation is provided through the territory of Ukraine? There is no analogy with Korea, except for your own opinion. Your statement about the Budapest memorandum is simply insulting. It implies that Ukraine was cheated to surrender its nuclear arsenal. Significant issue? Wait, until Ukraine will resume production of nuclear rockets. Don't forget that Ukraine has a nuclear potential and powerful rocket production in 692:

Ukrainian parliament doesn't seem to want to accept that. The ethnic Tatar's have their own issues with Russia. I know what's going on, and your use of puppet government doesn't help to serve your cause. When were the Crimean's asked about for their consent to have their constitutional rights stripped and abolished? North Korea is a very serious analogy and offers a direct parallel. If the US and the UK cannot hope to ever do anything about the situation on the Korean peninsula what chance do you give them about doing anything about Russia.

1219:

wider potential implications of the referendum and/or any resulting secession from Ukraine, into somewhere like a new subsection of the Background section of the article, if (and only if) reliable sources can be found to support them, perhaps with sentences beginning something like 'Analysts such as X and Y have expressed the view that A, while analysts such as Z1 and Z2 have expressed the view that B' I'm not sufficiently interested to go looking for such sources, but other editors might well be.

120:

both count). If so, is there any explaination for what happens if both pass? Will the one with the highest majority win? (Which could be interesting if most people voting yes on question 1 don't bother to vote for 2 so 2 ends up with a greater majority despite fewer yes voters or something of that sort.) Or highest 'yes' votes? Or what? i don't speak Ukrainian or Russian so don't think I can help clarify the article myself even if such details have been made public.

1756: 31: 2593:"When a statement is a fact (a piece of information about which there is no serious dispute) it should be asserted without prefixing it with "(Source) says that ...", and when a statement is an opinion (a matter which is subject to dispute) it should be attributed to the source that offered the opinion using inline-text attribution. In-text attribution to sources should be used where reliable sources disagree, not where editors disagree." 2947: 2902: 3036:- as a matter of fact; (3) the decision to conduct referendum was decided by Crimean parliament without quorum and with other violations; (4) referendum does not include the necessary question to keep "status quo"; (5) there was only a few days to prepare referendum. In this context, if the current Ukrainian administration or ousting of Yanukovich was accepted or not by any sides (as currently discussed in this paragraph) 1854: 1809: 2623:

the article in a way I feel is much more reflective of NPOV: "The ballot is even more confusing as it is unclear as to which version of the 1992 constitution does it refer to. This is because in 1992 the republic initially had a version that stipulated that Crimea was "an independent state" but it then ratified a second version one day later that stipulated that Crimea "was a part of Ukraine"."

2403: 387:

an occupation and the TRNC "government" and those who support it would be expelled. So... What gives on Turkey lecturing others about this? other than in the sense of rye humor... Or making this sort of commentary any sort of relevant statement in an encyclopaedia? Turkey has no right to lecture anyone about occupation for as long as the puppet government in TRNC continues to exist.

1336:

right to do whatever they want by simple majority', regardless of consequences, seems like a new one to me. Of course if such a claim is being reported by reliable sources in the context of this referendum, then maybe it belongs in the article. But I suspect we are more likely to find reliable sources discussing the international law claims, if anybody wants to look for them.

326: 2255: 2203: 607:

honor that agreement and whether its people want to rejoin the Russian federation. This is no different really to when Czechs and Slovaks decided they no longer wanted to work together or any other recent split among slavic nations. The Crimean population simply wants their choice rather than having it usurped by the Ukrainian government.

2409:. We must state that Tatars were deported and that Crimea's demographics changed because of that, particularly its ethnic majorities. The demographic history of a nation is very important for referendums as they tell you whether or not the referendum takes into consideration the nation's history and if it is protecting your minorities. 2296:

below about whether one option in the Crimean referendum is about optional independence. But I think it's illegal OR and/or POV to include any referendum unless accompanied by a citation that X has compared the Crimean referendum to referendum Y, in which case it belongs in a "criticism and support" section rather than in See also.

2004:. In other words: the legislatures approved the move but they want to check if the people support it through a referendum. Once the people vote they will then say, "you gotta recognize us because the people supported this through their vote." Russia will be the only one to recognize this move and the subsequent referendum however. — 2702:

All the referenda in the "See Also" section are stupid and should be removed. If you want to write a section on historical comparisons that's neutral and shows both sides, (eg. Putin's assertion that Scotland is a good analogy along side Clinton's statement) then by all means, add one. Simply adding

2640:

It is short-sighted to rule out this historical parallel just because Nazi Germany was involved. The "tactics" involved in this referendum are the same they were in 1938. Ignoring international treaties, one country annexed parts of another purely based on an pan-ethnic argument. And then (which this

2454:

But we must remain neutral in the article, so we can only say: "hey look, ethnic Russians are a majority today, but it has not always been like that. go to these articles, educate yourself, and come to your own conclusions." it gives a background to our readers that let them knows that not everything

2295:

Actually, the Catalan referendum is a lot more relevant than either the Scottish or Quebec referendums, because London and Ottawa accept the legality of the Scottish and Quebec referendums, while Madrid and Kiev deny the legality of the Catalan and Crimean referendums. Incidentally, there is a debate

1654:

Further, this sentence is not consistent with the body of the article: "The referendum will ask the people of Crimea whether they want to annex to Russia as a federal subject of the Russian Federation, or if they want to declare independence while restoring the 1992 Crimean constitution". I feel that

1310:

to do whatever they want by simple majority. Now, the question is if this is truly the will of the people or not, as there is a military intervention in the region by alleged "self-defense forces" and foreign (Russian) troops. These troops might instill fear on the people and sway away the referendum

1249:

is something that we might actually be able to use, albeit possibly in one of the other articles on the crisis. It's a transcript of a discussion on CNN yesterday, GPS (for Global Public Square), hosted by Fareed Zakharia. I saw part of it. There are several participants with differing views, but the

1218:

However this is not a forum for abstract debates, but for discussing how the article might be improved. So I will simply mention that I think the article would probably be improved by adding something like views such as mine and Orestes1984 (above) and any others that might be out there regarding the

964:

I support this because the installation of a pro European government is nothing more than the same nonsense that is going on in Venzeula right now with the attempt to cause acromony and install a pro Western government there. Deposing the Ukrainian president was nothing more than a pincer movement on

960:

On the issue of the Budapest memorandum it is absolutely not worth the paper that is written on... The United States will or United Kingdom will never directly sanction a war against Russia. The US particularly with an elastic band ecconomy that is about to snap will never win a conventional war with

655:

where are you getting these facts (quoting your statement) "Crimea considers itself an independent state that was ceded to the Ukraine back when the USSR was together, which was pretty much meaningless and a gesture of good will to Ukraine at the time". Do you known history of the region? Apparently,

620:

On the issue of the treaty to protect Ukraine's sovereign territory, this is not legally binding and I doubt either the UK or the US has any interest what so ever in starting a war that may become protracted with Russia. Any East vs. West conflict would be the bloodiest conflict we would have seen in

438:

I think we should consider a few subsections here. Domestic in support of the Russian position with what the Crimean "government" (I will call it that for now) has to state, Domestic in support of the Ukrainian position, international in support of Russia and international in support of the Ukrainian

386:

I smell some strong hypocrisy in Turkey's reaction particularly considering its own civil rights record that should be made note of, no less its protracted occupation of Cyprus and its relations with ethnic minority groups within Turkey. If Cypriot's had a referendum tomorrow there would no longer be

234:

I dispute this translation. It doesn't make sense. I ran the text through different online translators and it might mean something different. I think it means, "restoring the 1992 constitution and apply it as if we were still the Ukrainian Crimea even though we might be a Russian Crimea from now on".

3154:

Without going into explanation of every single point, because it was written like an essay (x happened but because of y, q is correct) and was a bunch of points strung together to form original conclusions. I think #1 is fine if its a standalone sentence, it was originally part of the intro sentence

2066:

I have the same opinion that the page should not be moved all the time. That's why I moved it to the original and most neutral title: 'Crimean referendum, 2014'. Please let's not change it to 'Crimean independence referendum, 2014' since choosing independence is not an option. Also 'status' is a bit

1563:

When people say that the referendum is illegal "under international laws" that might also mean that Crimea, as part of Ukraine, is subject to international treaties. One of these treaties might regulate the way referendums (or referendums for secession for that matter) must be executed. Furthermore,

1335:

The notion of rights and inalienable rights are also human constructs, and inalienable rights are usually stated as being rights to be defended regardless of the will of the majority, let alone a local majority that is a minority in a wider context, etc. The notion that a 'people have an inalienable

606:

I gather Crimea considers itself an independent state that was ceded to the Ukraine back when the USSR was together, which was pretty much meaningless and a gesture of good will to Ukraine at the time. The general Crimean population has decided it wants a referendum on whether it no longer wishes to

409:

Despite any "hypocrisy" of Turkey, which is well-known as only itself recognises the TRNC, we can't delete a reaction from a significant nation in the area because of that. However, I do agree that this section should be balanced with pro-Russia announcements, but I haven't seen enough international

119:

Are there any details on what the voting system is going to be like? Is only a simple majority needed? Will there a minimum percentage of voters either overall or for the yes options? Are the questions being treated as totally independent (meaning you can answer whatever you want in 1 and 2 and they

2645:

referendum as a post-hoc justification of an invasion. The comparison, like I said, is obvious. Unfortunately, if one adds a World-War-II-era comparison somewhere, narrow-minded people have the tendency to ask "who's Hitler in this comparison? (and whoever it is, let us imply that he'll also do the

2622:

I would note, as a brief follow-up, that the controversy over the meaning of "reverting to the 1992" constitution which the editor referred to in his/her edit summary and some interpret as being a second "Join Russia" option on the ballot is just that, a controversy. This was addressed earlier in

1384:

We could take it there, and thanks for the invitation, but I'm not sufficiently interested to do so - though my memory on the matter is none too reliable, at least in theory I think I was probably merely trying to point out under what circumstances your opinion might be included in this article, as

1200:

Of course your prediction may well turn out to be right. (Note: This referred to the above 'no war' prediction by Orestes1984 at 01:36, 7 March 2014 (UTC), which was a reply to my contribution of 12:27, 3 March 2014 (UTC), and to which I was then replying - but a vast amount of intervening text has

691:

I know a few simple things, Crimea was ceded to the Ukraine, this is a fact, the second fact here is that the population for the majority would appear to be ethnically Russian, I don't know exactly about the specifics of the cultural practices of Crimean's. Crimean WAS an autonomous region. The New

3184:

The second point has been dragged back and forth more than a couple of times and may or may not make sense at any given time. Your premise is correct - wherever the events take place local opinion should matter first. However, in this case, Crimea takes precedence as locality over Ukraine. So, the

3086:

This map is not what it seems to be. It's not about main spoken language, it's about 'native tongue', which in Eastern Europe means language of your ethnicity. Say, if you are Russian-speaking Ukrainian you are likely to answer that Ukrainian is your native tongue, even though you speak Russian in

1269:

There were claims by some heads of states that this referendum would violate international law. If it really does violate it then it would be nice to mention which part of it would be violated. Also, that would imply that international law forbids any secession that is not supported by the laws of

573:

It seems to me that they are declaring that Crimea is sovereign ('state independance'), but is currently choosing to stay inside Ukraine on the basis of agreements and treaties, rather like a EU state is sovereign but chooses to stay within the EU. The point is that a sovereign state can change or

390:

This kind of "reactions" section is only going to lead to more hypocritical commentary and heavily weighted bias. At this point in time I have been simply watching this article, as with other Crimean related pages. There is always more than one side to the story, we should be careful not to have a

954:

None of where the electricity or water comes from is relevant to this, and perhaps you should read some Crimean history. This is the exact same type of nonsense which happened with the 1994 Crimean presidential elections, and just like 1994 the Ukrainian government involved itself in a situation

583:

It's also too early to say whether the Crimean leaders and/or Putin intend Crimea to leave Ukraine, or merely to use the referendum to guarantee the official status of the Russian language which Kiev has just abolished (along with that of the Tatar language, though the Tatars currently seem more

2446:

it took the Tatars 12 years to regrow from 1.6% to 12%. They have been draining political power out of ethnic Russians simply by reproducing. If the trend continues you will have a Tatar population with more political power and an ethnic Russian population with less political power. This is why

834:

Ukraine is the only state in the world that surrendered its nuclear weapon. And now what? What is the power of that Budapest memorandum? Now no one even listens and no one can find it on the map. It only reassures that the surrender of nuclear weapon was a grave mistake. So, stop your off-topic

160:

or the information given to the media was poorly redacted. The process and questions as stated by the BBC don't make sense: the "questions" are mutually exclusive and therefore cannot be independent from one another; it should be either one or the other (or against all) but you can't have a tie

957:

Furthermore you may wish to read about what happened On 19 February 1954, the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the Soviet Union issued a decree transferring the Crimean Oblast from the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic to the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic The transfer of the

2587:

I am removing the obvious POV in the see also section at the bottom of the page. A comparison to Nazi Germany is one-sided; it would be POV to link to Nazi Germany-related articles in articles of Maidan, for example, despite these comparisons having been made repeatedly by their opponents. A

2506:

I disagree. Referendums, by their own nature, are heavily linked to your demographics and history. You have the right to differ though. So consider this as us failing to reach consensus on your your suggestion. Besides, the sentences don't dwell into details. They are both vague and neutral.

2378:

Demographically, the region is currently populated by Russian-speaking majorities but with such demographics undergoing dramatic changes for the past 200 years that have shifted the ethnic majorities from its indigenous people to ethnic Russians, due in part to the their deportation 70 years

1085:

I am not talking about propaganda, the way you frame your conversation however is open to interpretation. I could interpret that it is loaded with propaganda. Russia as far as I can tell has no interest in invading Europe, what it has had interest in more recently involves protecting its own

428:

Yes, it's comments like these from Turkey that simply are incomprehensible through any rational logic, my comments simply reflect that. I realise we cannot delete such statements that are credibly referenced despite their questionable merit. My main concern is that this section in particular

465:

not as if it is fact. We can't choose/select what to put in. Its NPOV just to have these reactions. And if you find other international reactions on other sides then feel free to add it. In the meantime, like or disliking or calling otu the hypocrisy is synthesis here and our own analysis.

2450:

So, 13 years later, as the Tatars are still recouping, this referendum occurs. Of course the outcome is gonna be to join Russia and of course it will be to secede: the people that deported the indigenous people are now a majority that fear they won't be one in the not-so-distant future.

251:

It seems they are not questions but options. The question seems to be: "which of the following two options do you support? (choose one)" with the first option being joining Russia while the second being remaining a part of Ukraine while restoring the 1992 constitution at the same time.

2773:

And what would be a test for "historical comparability"? If you are really bent on Anschluss comparison, find the source that compares the two (there are plenty of those) and stick it in the article. Why do we have to have this debate on what other referenda to include at the bottom.

1720:

at the start of the Russian take-over had a big notice on its map saying Crimea was part of Russia until handed over to Ukraine in 1954 (or words to that effect). If even an American News Channel (rather than just the Russian side) saw that as relevant, is it NPOV of us to remove it?

3155:

and read like it was causation, that the referendum was related to the historic demographic changes. #2 I think my issue with this standalone was the 'in contrast' since it's the 99% majority worldview. Ukraine shouldnt be contrasting the referendum, it's happening in Ukraine. --

1895:

That's just your personal interpretation, if reliable sources are unanimous in their assessment, that's what we go by. The wording of the referendum just says "its status vis a vis Ukraine", and in 1992 it was independent, and this is now covered by CNN, Fox, Globe and Mail, and

1655:"annex" is improper term (if not POV), "join" will be much more appropriate. The second option clearly is not about independence, but rather remaining within Ukraine (as the body shows, despite possible conflict with 1992 language). I think the problem here is the COI source. -- 2588:"criticisms" section in this article would be completely legitimate, as would the inclusion of FOX and the Kyiv Post's analysis of the ballot and Hillary Clinton (or whatever other relevant international figure)'s comparison to the Anschluss. To quote Knowledge's guidelines 2885:

There were Scythians, Greeks and Slavs (proto-Russian) before the Tatars arrived. Can't the intro just say that over the last 200 years the majority went from simply "Tatar to Russian" seeing as the main focus of this referendum is on the interests of Russians in Crimea?

1131:

Moreover, there never ever have been any reports of persecution of the Russian population in Ukraine, so the invasion is completely groundless. The autonomy of Crimea is not a Russian national autonomy, but rather due to its multinational composition, please refer to the

554:

I haven't seen a source yet that would explain, what the referendum would change. This ambiguity is probably intentional - they don't risk with outright referendum of independence, yet the people are demanding that something be done as a reaction to the events in Kiev.

1496: 1450: 391:

section here that is purely the negative reactions from those that support the Ukrainian perspective. Moreover, we should also be careful to choose what sort of countries are providing their "analysis" (using the term very loosely) of what is going on.

1111:, I understood only one thing that you are absolutely confident that all my facts are absolute propaganda and your "buffer zone" understanding of Ukraine is absolute truth. You refuse to see anything further beyond the stand off between east and west. 3177:

That's the reality of Knowledge, as multiple editors attempt to improve the article, some points tend to get muddled as the surrounding sentences may change the context of otherwise valid point. Which is why we should avoid writing essays

1735:

It has nothing to do with POV, but rather facts. As I stated above, Crimea was never part of modern Russia, but rather Imperial and Soviet Russia (and Soviet Union), which were different countries. In 1954, there was no Russia, but rather

1453:. On 22 July 2010, the ICJ ruled that the declaration of independence of Kosovo "did not violate any applicable rule of international law", because its authors, who were "representatives of the people of Kosovo", were not bound by the 1687:

I think it's POV as currently worded. We should probably use the wording of the referendum question (which is there even in the cited Kiev Post article), and then add a sentence about 'The Kiev Post has said that ...'

1454: 1385:

well as pointing out some of the counter-opinions that might then also acquire a claim for inclusion. However if anybody else wants to discuss it on Ahnoneemoos's Talk page, I certainly wouldn't seek to dissuade them.

728:, you say: "Crimean WAS an autonomous region. The New Ukrainian parliament doesn't seem to want to accept that." Wow, where did you get from??? Now, a question. When did Crimea lost its autonomous status? After the 2599:

Some users have taken issue with my not providing a talk page justification of my earlier reversion. Hopefully this will be satisfactory to explain why these must be deleted, and not degenerate into an edit war.

1673:". What matters here is conveying to our readers that it used to be part of the former "version" of Russia. Let's wait for more feedback regarding the independence/sudivision of Ukraine as I don't speak Russian. — 3027:

Second paragraph in introduction tells: "The referendum is polarized by a divide..." and so on. I am not sure this is proper description. After reading various sources, it seems this referendum was described as

1958:

What is this referendum about then? Its not autonomy, its not independence. It has to be about something. People are not out there to just vote. There is some status for sure and that caveat needs to be in the

203:

in Russian) lists it as also asking that Ukraine remain a part of Ukraine (per the 1992 constitution). I added that text to the article, and I hope an English-language source will report it in the near future.

3116:

The European Union, Germany, France, and several other nations, in contrast, recognize the newly appointed interim government in Ukraine and condemn the actions taken by Crimea and Sevastopol, including the

502:

The reaction section clearly suffers from reference bias. It would serve the article better to include "reactions" from countries that have supported (Russia,Syria, etc) and been neutral to lukewarm (china)

2412:

In this case, if the deportation would not have happened, Crimea would probably have an egalitarian society with 1/3 being ethnic Russians, 1/3 being ethnic Ukrainians, and 1/3 being Tatars. But when you

2386:

I recognise the fact that they were deported and it was a tragedy, but this article has nothing to do with it. This being a sensitive issue, I figured I'd ask for consensus before removing the sentences.

1270:

the central government (i.e. not supported by the central government), which would render illegal any attempt of secession that comes with disagreement with the central government. Is that really so? --

820:??? Why do consider Ukraine inferior to any sovereign country in the world, borders of which are respected across the world. Also, is it really possible to conduct a referendum in less than 10 days? 3032:

legitimate for the following reasons: (1) it contradicts Ukrainian constitution (as has been already confirmed by their constitutional court) - no one ever disputed this, (2) It is conducted under

1014:. Not Konstantinov nor Temirgaliev both represent the biggest faction became Prime Minister. All decisions on appointing the Prime Minister and referendum were conducted right after sailors of the 2166:

I have move protected this page. Six name changes in about 24 hours (3 away and 3 back) is way too many. Come to some consensus first, and then ask for the page to be renamed, if appropriate.

2052:

can you please stop moving the pages - it has become quite a hassle trying to edit them! Can you reach a consensus first what this should be called and then (and only then) move. Please! --

2908:. I think it was me the one who wrote "indigenous people" by accident while I was copyediting. I agree with you, we should name them rather than call them "indigenous" to remain neutral. — 2523:

I dont argue the neutrality, but how vagueness is a good thing? My issue is that you cant seem to connect this with the issue on hand. Tatar question is not a part of the referendum.--

2596:

A comparison to Nazism is not a factual statement, it is a representation of ONE of the valid, mainstream opinions that exist regarding this issue and should be represented as such.

2447:

Ukraine is adamant of calling this referendum illegal: Tatars tend to ally with Ukraine, if Ukraine waits a couple more generations, it will recover Crimea by natural reproduction.

1702:

I agree, will reword. Btw, I removed "Crimea was part of Russia" due to points above, plus, at some point Ukraine was part of Russia and Soviet Union, so the point is really moot.--

296:

Perfect, just like I suspected. Can you please help us to translate that into American English? I tried with Google translator but it missed several critical words. Thanks a ton! —

3121:

I fixed the other ones you tagged but I don't understand your claims on these two. I would really appreciate if you can explain your reasoning so that we can improve the article.

2067:

dubious since the status as a 'depended republic' is quite clear. It's only a matter which country it will be part of. So the original title was the best and is also in line with

1182:

were snipped down while trying to topple down the Kremlin-supported Yanukovych regime and you are here expressing your support for the Ukraine's division. Do you have any morals?

2554: 403: 3224: 1439: 2425:

deportation your ehtnic majorities change to what you have today: 3/5 ethnic Russians which comprise more than half of the population and that can squash minorities through

1541:

Otherwise, it seems that "this is illegal under international law" is just an empty phrase used by various politicians to negatively comment on the stuff they don't like. --

1358:

We can take this convo to my personal talk page as this page is to discuss the article rather than our personal opinions about what constitutes a human construct or not. —

410:

news to know who that would be. I imagine that Russia's main supporters would possibly be Belarus, Bulgaria and Serbia, and maybe somebody should look for such reaction.

2382:

All Tatars were deported from Crimea and many killed in May 1944 by Soviet leader Stalin's order. Only after 1991 were they able to return in greater numbers to Crimea.

2339:. I believe, at this point the article is NPOV and we are more than 40 edits away from the last significant edit. Would you agree that we can safely remove the tag? -- 759:

who already tried to cede Crimea to Russia. Did you know anything about all I have just told you? Do you know that the only potable water in Crimea is supplied by the

2819:

somebody wants to add referenda under "see also," they need to be relevant. It'd be okay (or maybe even better) to add none, and stick to bigger picture stuff like

2703:

a link to a referendum implies that the situation was analogous or applicable. Failing to flesh out why it's applicable compromises the neutrality of the article.

1458: 1415:

Don't worry. This is a talk page, not an article. Whatever I say here should be taken as that: an opinion, and should not be included in the article just because. —

1295:

which treaties Russia has ratified (since the outcome would be for Crimea to join Russia which at this time is part of Ukraine and is, therefore, not independent)

3000: 3033: 79: 71: 66: 1640:

Russia, but rather Soviet and Imperial Russia. But then, we will have to start listing all countries it has been part of. I'd say "complex history" will do. --

1528:

legal under international law or not? And, more importantly, is it possible to find the part of international law related to this legality and cite it from a

2440:

wants. But this is not what Crimea has today: the indigenous people which comprised a majority were forced out and now compose a mere 12% of the population.

539:

It should be explained how exactly would Crimean status change in case of passing referendum, what sort of autonomy would if get that it doesn't have now. --

3087:

your daily life. This is what the word 'Russian-speaking' means in Ukraine and this is what Putin meant. This map is enormously misguiding in this context.

2603:

In summary, I encourage such comparisons to be placed in an appropriate corresponding section and to be sourced to a relevant figure voicing said opinions.

1863:

Yes, Kyiv Post wrote about the terms and its cited in the article. Its between Russia or independence (and joining Russia later). Not Russia vs. Ukraine. --

136:

There is only one question with two options as possible answers. They will be able to choose only one option. Whichever is chosen by the majority wins (ie:

2443:

Then you have the case where the people of Crimea accepted the wrongs of the past and allowed Tatars to return through repatriation. Look at this graphic:

2000:

From what I understand the referendum is to vote on whether the action taken by the Crimean parliament and the city council of Sevastopol should be taken

2185:

I do not see any references to Sevastopol participating in the referendum (I only see Crimea). I could be blind, but can we make those more prominent? --

1881:

But that's just an interpretation. The real options in the referendum are not changed. In fact, the second option clearly include the word 'Ukraine'.--

1019: 1840: 709:

The Budapest agreement isn't worth the paper it's written on, and on the issue of Ukrainian proliferation, that is no longer a significant issue. --

1927:." This is still stated in the text and infobox. Why? As mentioned above, questions are not changed. The people will be asked whether they want to 1669:

Feel free to change "annex" to "join". Regarding the modern Russia, feel free to change it to, "the region used to be a republic of the dissolved

1179: 797:

was conducted without national or regional referendum. All needs to be done is to take over the regional administration as it was done in Crimea.

1302:

Furthermore, it is a very interesting case for international law since, regardless of which treaties have been ratified, laws and treaties are a

1923:

the people of these regions whether they want to join Russia as a federal subject, or if they want to restore the 1992 Crimean constitution and

2721:

Stupid or not, we either include all "independence" or "status" referenda or none. Picking and choosing which ones to include amounts to OR. --

2089:

is so called because there were two separate issues, so neither can be in the title, and therefore is irrelevant to the title of this article.

1525: 1311:

towards a particular outcome, even when the military is not coercing the populace (its mere presence alone can be catalogued as a "coercion").

2488:

belongs there. You can include as many links to all those articles. Referendum is about the future state of the peninsula, not its history.--

199:

RT reports the text of the 2nd question as "Are you in favor of restoring Crimea's 1992 constitution?", but the Crimean government website (

3088: 2969: 1542: 97: 3139: 2856: 2824: 2573: 2546: 2281:

That was on independence, not transfer of sovereignty. We may as well include this year's Scottish and Catalan referendums in that case

1940: 1462: 1271: 540: 504: 368: 47: 17: 3213:

Backing Request by Serbia, General Assembly Decides to Seek International Court of Justice Ruling on Legality of Kosovo’s Independence

2748: 2354:

I removed the significant changes tag, as it has been quite a while since last overhaul. Unfortunately, POV still remains an issue.--

2747:. Just those that happend in a historically comparable scenario. I don't see much similarites to Scotland. But I do see some to the 2642: 2550: 2481: 733: 3181:

I agree with #1, as it does imply causation, whereas the causes for the referendum as much more complex than "demographic changes".

1472:

This ICJ ruling would seem to suggest that the Crimeans are also not violating any rule of international law, for the same reason.

740:. When Ukraine became independent, the government of Ukraine granted Crimea the autonomous status and allowed the return of the 2837:

Agree, this is a perfect example of irrendentism. Would you like to write a sentence on this and insert it into the article? --

2143: 2100: 1990: 1588: 1446: 3109:: could you please tell us what do you consider as original research or as improper synthesis on the following two sentences: 3071: 3049: 3012: 2891: 2286: 1187: 1167: 1145: 1116: 1039: 940: 913: 877: 840: 825: 802: 776: 771:. What you know about significance? You have no idea about the situation in the region comparing it with the North Korea. 661: 415: 1636:

Whether or not the "region used to be part of Russia" is irrelevant, if not controversial. It has never been part of the

1022:

with the Russian soldiers still being inside the session hall. Do you know what will happen next? Russia will invade the

736:). How do you call that other than genocide? Next question. When did Crimea regain its autonomous status? Just prior the 274:). Moreover, marking two variants at same time is impossible (these bulletins are invalid per art. 4 of chapter 4 of the 2129: 1976: 1292:

which treaties the Ukraine has ratified (that by extension apply to Crimea since Crimea is a Ukrainian subdivision), and

2651: 2956: 2444: 2114:

which people could approve or reject. That's why the article is called Saar Statue referendum (with capital letter).--

1503: 38: 3044:

law and Kosovo, but this is also less relevant. This paragraph and some other parts should be rewritten, I think.

2647: 2928: 2374:

There are two unreferenced sentences in the article dealing with Crimean Tatars that do not seem to belong here:

1740:, which was part of Soviet Union. By the same token Ukraine was part of both Imperial Russia and Soviet Union. -- 1011: 872:? Those are all forgotten countries. How do you call invasion of Crimea by Russian four days after the Olympics? 560: 209: 3067: 3045: 3008: 2887: 2679: 2282: 2171: 2086: 2068: 1466: 1183: 1163: 1141: 1112: 1082: 1035: 951: 936: 909: 873: 836: 821: 798: 772: 737: 688: 657: 411: 3092: 2815:

Because it started with somebody adding Quebec and Puerto rico, neither of which is in any way relevant here.

1546: 1944: 1275: 544: 508: 3143: 2860: 2828: 2708: 2577: 2023: 1133: 749: 372: 3113:

subdivisions of Ukraine with a long and complex history whose demographics have undergone dramatic changes.

1975:"Crimean status referendum, 2014" would probably be the most appropriate. It's what we use for things like 1476:

we are seemingly not allowed say this ourselves in the article (because of I-forget-which Knowledge rule),

394:

This section needs more references, particularly from those who support the Russian and Crimean position --

3197: 3168: 3147: 3133: 3096: 3075: 3053: 3016: 2989: 2975: 2940: 2917: 2895: 2864: 2846: 2832: 2803: 2783: 2760: 2730: 2712: 2695: 2634: 2617: 2581: 2566: 2532: 2516: 2497: 2485: 2470: 2396: 2363: 2348: 2320: 2305: 2290: 2270: 2246: 2218: 2194: 2175: 2148: 2123: 2105: 2080: 2061: 2035: 2013: 1995: 1968: 1948: 1909: 1890: 1876: 1857: 1843:, the referendum has changed to "Join Russia now" or "Join Russia later". The article should be updated. 1827: 1812: 1771: 1749: 1730: 1711: 1697: 1682: 1664: 1649: 1630: 1602: 1573: 1550: 1515: 1489: 1424: 1394: 1367: 1345: 1326: 1279: 1259: 1228: 1191: 1171: 1149: 1137: 1120: 1095: 1043: 974: 944: 917: 881: 844: 829: 806: 780: 718: 665: 630: 593: 564: 548: 527: 512: 485: 448: 419: 376: 343: 319: 305: 291: 261: 246: 228: 213: 205: 184: 170: 151: 129: 108: 3059:

What had actually happened? The Crimean parliament already adopted independence from Ukraine, a few days

1853: 1808: 3193: 3129: 2985: 2936: 2913: 2842: 2799: 2779: 2726: 2630: 2613: 2528: 2512: 2493: 2466: 2392: 2359: 2344: 2316: 2266: 2242: 2214: 2190: 2057: 2009: 1767: 1745: 1707: 1678: 1660: 1645: 1626: 1569: 1420: 1363: 1322: 1091: 970: 753: 714: 626: 444: 399: 301: 257: 242: 166: 147: 2972:

followed a similar format to Crimea's (asking to "choose the option you prefer best"). I changed it to

2704: 2851:

I'd put that instead of "Greater Russia" under "see also" (in fact, I had that, but it got reverted;

935:

from Ukraine and I am against that insane referendum as it may lead to total chaos across the globe.

865: 741: 556: 3237:

Accordance with international law of the unilateral declaration of independence in respect of Kosovo

3225:

Accordance with international law of the unilateral declaration of independence in respect of Kosovo

2756: 2691: 2562: 2301: 2167: 2138: 2095: 1985: 1726: 1693: 1511: 1485: 1390: 1341: 1255: 1224: 760: 589: 224: 157: 125: 3138:(That's not the way it works, btw. Others don't have to be begging for explanations or guessing. 3064: 1847: 1802: 1795: 955:

where the Crimean people are not allowed to have their own opinion on the issue of independence.

861: 279: 2927:

I dont think the Referendum Infobox is appropriate here, as it only assumes "Yes/No" outcome. A

1762:. Let's leave that part out. It would stir too much trouble as this article is controversial. — 1246: 1245:

On the question of the war risk (discussed and overdiscussed in our first Talk section above),

748:. Next you are asking about rights being stripped. What is that all about??? Have you read the 3163: 2477: 1904: 1871: 1307: 339: 315: 287: 180: 2646:

other things Hitler did)". That is unnecessary. Just because a historical parallel is drawn (

3189: 3125: 3082:

Linguistic map of Ukraine according to 2001 census, with Russian (in red) dominant in Crimea

2981: 2932: 2909: 2852: 2838: 2795: 2775: 2722: 2626: 2609: 2553:

referendum as a post-hoc justification of an invasion. Former US Secretary of State Clinton

2524: 2508: 2489: 2462: 2388: 2355: 2340: 2312: 2262: 2238: 2210: 2186: 2119: 2076: 2053: 2031: 2005: 1964: 1886: 1823: 1763: 1741: 1703: 1674: 1656: 1641: 1622: 1614: 1598: 1565: 1416: 1359: 1318: 1108: 1087: 1007: 966: 924: 897: 849: 813: 725: 710: 652: 622: 523: 481: 440: 395: 297: 253: 238: 162: 143: 104: 2667: 2426: 1303: 1015: 137: 3212: 2931:

would be better IMO. I dont have time right now to fix it myself, so if anyone could...--

752:? Apparently not. Ukraine is a unitary state. Back in 1994 there was one separatist from 476:

Though the domestic section is adequate there. Im removing the tga and reorganisating is.

275: 1438:

But getting back to the question of international Law, currently the final paragraph of

1285:

It depends on which treaties the signatories have ratified. In this case, it depends on:

271: 3004: 2962: 2752: 2687: 2663: 2558: 2297: 2133: 2090: 2041: 1980: 1722: 1689: 1507: 1497:

International Court of Justice advisory opinion on Kosovo's declaration of independence

1481: 1451:

International Court of Justice advisory opinion on Kosovo's declaration of independence

1386: 1337: 1251: 1220: 1023: 901: 768: 585: 220: 121: 2946: 2901: 2813:"Why do we have to have this debate on what other referenda to include at the bottom." 2655: 2433: 2432:

I don't know what's the law in Crimea but in America referendums like this require a

2085:

The Saar referendum noted above was also about choosing which country to be part of.

1716:

I'm not so sure that removing "Crimea was part of Russia" is such a good idea - even

1618: 1027: 786: 756: 3236: 1480:

we seemingly are allowed quote reliable sources that say this, if any can be found.

1449:(UNGA) resolution adopted on 8 October 2008 backed the request of Serbia to seek an 3157: 3106: 2111: 1936: 1898: 1865: 1670: 1529: 1158:? Who invaded it? Uhh.... NO ONE. So how is it the same? Are you comparing it with 869: 857: 729: 335: 311: 283: 176: 381: 2820: 2417:

the Tatars (they were literally brought down to 0% of the population) through a

2115: 2072: 2049: 2045: 2027: 1960: 1882: 1819: 1794:

Crimea has declared itself as a sovereign state and refuses to rejoin Ukraine. (

1594: 817: 519: 477: 100: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

473:

RS sources with said position, you cant organise like that without any content.

2671: 2402: 2110:

In case of the Saarland referendum. There was a specific agreement called the

1500: 1159: 1031: 928: 382:

hypocrisy of Turkey's reaction and general comments on the "reactions" section

200: 1621:. Please check for NPOV and tag anything that you believe that must change. — 2659: 1155: 745: 2980:

and used its blank labels to portray the question and its options. HTH, —

932: 853: 732:

when all the Crimean Tatars were deported by the RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT (see

2229:

Can anyone validate the Crimean Tatar term for this? The article says:

905: 764: 2022:

Was coming here to suggest what N57 diud. Its also with precedence on

1499:, which incidentally states that "This was the first case regarding a 958:

Crimean Oblast to Ukraine has been described as a "symbolic gesture,"

794: 790: 2436:

of 67%+ or 75%+ to demonstrate, unequivocally, that that's what the

518:

Do you have sources that show that? If so then feel feree to add it(

2794:

Just out of curiosity, why Panama is similar and Scotland isn't? --

2476:

I dont see how any of this has anything to do with the referendum.

2675: 1737: 461:

It is sourced to RS and written in a manner that asseers Turkey's

3063:

to this referendum, allegedly to make this referendum legitimate

2549:

to the "See also" section. The historical parallel is obvious: a

906:

Russian Military Forces Come Into Chonhar Village, Kherson Region

864:) when those republics were invaded by Russians, note during the 1591:

Ukraine parliament delivers ultimatum to Crimea over referendum

3001:

Pressure and Intimidation Sweep Crimea Ahead of Secession Vote

1717: 1440:

International_recognition_of_the_Republic_of_Kosovo#Background

965:

territories that would traditionally have supported Russia. --

175:

Yes, you can't have a tie. See my recent post in topic above.

25: 2455:

is black and white, nor as it seems on the first impression.

2855:

blanket-reverts everything I add, so I won't waste my time)

1241:

Item that may be citeable by us in relation to the war risk

3102:

Specific tags for original research and improper synthesis

2458:

So no, I don't agree with the removal of these sentences.

961:

Russia in Russia, Crimea or anywhere else for that matter.

2881:"shifted the majority from indigenous to ethnic Russians" 219:

Thanks for adding it - that's a pretty important piece.

1442:

seems to be of possible major relevance here. It says:

330: 1935:

on term of 1992 Constitution. Current formulation is

1798:) Maybe the options for the referendum have changed? 1818:

No, but this move should be mentioned on the page.(

1026:. To no one is secret that eastern regions of the 2331:This article had an improvement tag put on for 2233:. The ballot seems to say something different: 1495:There is a complete article on the judgment at 2237:. Which one is it? And can we get a source? -- 2132:. No idea why you've brought up the 1955 one. 8: 3239:, International Court of Justice, 2010-07-22 2311:Similar debate just two sections over ^^^ -- 3188:Rest of the world. Does this make sense? -- 1306:: the people of Crimea ultimately have the 201:http://www.rada.crimea.ua/news/06_03_2014_1 1020:building of the Supreme Council of Crimea 367:why "some"? how many millions are there? 2961:assumes that all referendums follow the 1609:Lead revamp done in good faith, March 11 785:I would like to see the reaction of the 3205: 1526:unilateral declaration of independence 835:political analysis about North Korea. 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 3185:opinions should count as Crimea : --> 2968:... but they don't. For example, the 364:"some leaders of the Crimean Tatars" 7: 3034:military occupation by another state 429:maintains a semblance of neutrality. 2970:1998 Puerto Rican status referendum 2686:imply all that other Nazi stuff. -- 2547:Austrian Anschluss referendum, 1938 2541:Austrian Anschluss referendum, 1938 18:Talk:2014 Crimean status referendum 3187:Russia (as the second party) : --> 2749:Separation of Panama from Colombia 2486:Demographic distribution of Crimea 2327:March 2014 Article Improvement Tag 1030:contain high concentration of the 24: 1506:to be brought before the court." 734:Deportation of the Crimean Tatars 310:I will try when i'll get a time. 2945: 2900: 2401: 2253: 2201: 1925:potentially declare independence 1852: 1807: 1754: 904:which IS NOT autonomous region ( 324: 29: 2641:article is about), there was a 1447:United Nations General Assembly 852:, do you know what happened to 2277:Relevance of Quebec referendum 270:, not separate questions (see 1: 1457:(promulgated by UNMIK) or by 744:who mostly were resettled in 565:15:43, 28 February 2014 (UTC) 549:15:31, 28 February 2014 (UTC) 469:Of cours eyuou have to first 235:Can a translator help please? 161:between Question #1 and #2. — 3215:, United Nations, 2008-10-08 3040:. There is discussion about 2545:Just to explain why I added 2130:Saar status referendum, 1935 1977:Saar status referendum, 1935 1467:organs of the United Nations 1463:United Nations Member States 1504:declaration of independence 3256: 3198:19:56, 16 March 2014 (UTC) 3169:16:47, 15 March 2014 (UTC) 3148:05:49, 15 March 2014 (UTC) 3134:05:27, 15 March 2014 (UTC) 3097:08:13, 16 March 2014 (UTC) 3076:20:08, 15 March 2014 (UTC) 3054:19:55, 15 March 2014 (UTC) 3017:01:26, 15 March 2014 (UTC) 2990:23:21, 14 March 2014 (UTC) 2941:22:27, 14 March 2014 (UTC) 2918:18:58, 13 March 2014 (UTC) 2896:18:14, 13 March 2014 (UTC) 2865:14:37, 13 March 2014 (UTC) 2847:13:28, 13 March 2014 (UTC) 2833:12:42, 13 March 2014 (UTC) 2804:22:50, 12 March 2014 (UTC) 2784:22:48, 12 March 2014 (UTC) 2761:21:32, 12 March 2014 (UTC) 2743:You don't have to include 2731:20:30, 12 March 2014 (UTC) 2713:19:04, 12 March 2014 (UTC) 2696:08:08, 12 March 2014 (UTC) 2635:06:13, 12 March 2014 (UTC) 2618:06:04, 12 March 2014 (UTC) 2582:05:12, 12 March 2014 (UTC) 2567:23:19, 11 March 2014 (UTC) 2533:13:34, 13 March 2014 (UTC) 2517:00:53, 13 March 2014 (UTC) 2498:16:24, 12 March 2014 (UTC) 2471:23:34, 11 March 2014 (UTC) 2397:22:09, 11 March 2014 (UTC) 2364:13:31, 13 March 2014 (UTC) 2349:21:17, 11 March 2014 (UTC) 2321:23:37, 12 March 2014 (UTC) 2306:23:32, 12 March 2014 (UTC) 2291:18:19, 12 March 2014 (UTC) 2271:21:26, 12 March 2014 (UTC) 2247:18:08, 11 March 2014 (UTC) 2219:21:25, 12 March 2014 (UTC) 2195:17:43, 11 March 2014 (UTC) 2176:17:51, 12 March 2014 (UTC) 2149:20:40, 12 March 2014 (UTC) 2124:20:27, 12 March 2014 (UTC) 2106:17:59, 12 March 2014 (UTC) 2081:17:23, 12 March 2014 (UTC) 2062:16:20, 12 March 2014 (UTC) 2036:20:25, 11 March 2014 (UTC) 2014:20:11, 11 March 2014 (UTC) 1996:19:55, 11 March 2014 (UTC) 1969:19:31, 11 March 2014 (UTC) 1949:18:32, 12 March 2014 (UTC) 1910:20:30, 12 March 2014 (UTC) 1891:15:28, 12 March 2014 (UTC) 1877:04:27, 12 March 2014 (UTC) 1858:03:48, 12 March 2014 (UTC) 1828:19:32, 11 March 2014 (UTC) 1813:19:30, 11 March 2014 (UTC) 1772:18:12, 11 March 2014 (UTC) 1750:17:59, 11 March 2014 (UTC) 1731:17:48, 11 March 2014 (UTC) 1712:17:36, 11 March 2014 (UTC) 1698:17:27, 11 March 2014 (UTC) 1683:16:11, 11 March 2014 (UTC) 1665:15:49, 11 March 2014 (UTC) 1650:15:41, 11 March 2014 (UTC) 1631:14:02, 11 March 2014 (UTC) 1603:16:59, 11 March 2014 (UTC) 1574:19:10, 10 March 2014 (UTC) 1551:17:45, 10 March 2014 (UTC) 1516:03:56, 10 March 2014 (UTC) 1490:03:36, 10 March 2014 (UTC) 1461:that is addressed only to 1425:19:10, 10 March 2014 (UTC) 1395:03:36, 10 March 2014 (UTC) 1260:05:33, 10 March 2014 (UTC) 195:Translation of Question #2 2557:draws this comparison. -- 2484:belongs in that article, 2480:belongs in that article, 1790:Independence as an option 1368:05:06, 8 March 2014 (UTC) 1346:04:45, 8 March 2014 (UTC) 1327:15:46, 7 March 2014 (UTC) 1280:15:17, 7 March 2014 (UTC) 1229:03:03, 8 March 2014 (UTC) 1192:00:39, 9 March 2014 (UTC) 1172:00:25, 9 March 2014 (UTC) 1150:00:21, 9 March 2014 (UTC) 1121:16:30, 9 March 2014 (UTC) 1096:05:52, 9 March 2014 (UTC) 1044:00:17, 9 March 2014 (UTC) 1012:Supreme Council of Crimea 975:00:04, 9 March 2014 (UTC) 945:21:14, 8 March 2014 (UTC) 918:20:09, 8 March 2014 (UTC) 882:18:45, 8 March 2014 (UTC) 845:04:58, 8 March 2014 (UTC) 830:18:32, 8 March 2014 (UTC) 816:, why are you supporting 807:18:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC) 793:stating that the sell of 781:18:22, 8 March 2014 (UTC) 719:05:08, 8 March 2014 (UTC) 666:04:50, 8 March 2014 (UTC) 631:01:36, 7 March 2014 (UTC) 594:12:27, 3 March 2014 (UTC) 528:16:39, 8 March 2014 (UTC) 513:23:33, 7 March 2014 (UTC) 486:16:38, 8 March 2014 (UTC) 449:13:09, 8 March 2014 (UTC) 420:12:54, 8 March 2014 (UTC) 404:11:16, 8 March 2014 (UTC) 377:09:18, 8 March 2014 (UTC) 344:15:41, 7 March 2014 (UTC) 320:15:31, 7 March 2014 (UTC) 306:13:18, 7 March 2014 (UTC) 292:12:56, 7 March 2014 (UTC) 262:01:50, 7 March 2014 (UTC) 247:01:42, 7 March 2014 (UTC) 229:18:46, 6 March 2014 (UTC) 214:18:05, 6 March 2014 (UTC) 185:13:16, 7 March 2014 (UTC) 171:05:49, 7 March 2014 (UTC) 152:02:09, 7 March 2014 (UTC) 130:22:24, 6 March 2014 (UTC) 109:16:12, 6 March 2014 (UTC) 2680:Nazi concentration camps 2235:Umumqirim Referendumynda 2087:Crimean referendum, 1994 2069:Crimean referendum, 1994 1939:and misleads readers. — 1455:Constitutional Framework 763:that branches away from 738:fall of the Soviet Union 2652:Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact 2024:Abyei status referendum 1134:Constitution of Ukraine 789:if Russia would invade 750:Constitution of Ukraine 2953:. The problem is that 1162:or the Crimea crisis? 1138:Constitution of Crimea 156:I think we are either 3227:, Nspm.rs, 2010-07-22 2648:Sykes–Picot Agreement 1919:"The referendum will 1154:Why are you bringing 754:Dnipropetrovsk Oblast 42:of past discussions. 2929:generic Election box 1613:I revamped the lead 866:2008 Summer Olympics 742:Crimean Tatar people 92:Need to mention the 3068:My very best wishes 3046:My very best wishes 3009:My very best wishes 2423:highly questionable 2337:significant changes 2283:The Almightey Drill 2231:Qırım duvajte kurac 2225:Qırım duvajte kurac 1184:Aleksandr Grigoryev 1164:Aleksandr Grigoryev 1142:Aleksandr Grigoryev 1113:Aleksandr Grigoryev 1083:Aleksandr Grigoryev 1036:Aleksandr Grigoryev 952:Aleksandr Grigoryev 937:Aleksandr Grigoryev 910:Aleksandr Grigoryev 874:Aleksandr Grigoryev 837:Aleksandr Grigoryev 822:Aleksandr Grigoryev 799:Aleksandr Grigoryev 773:Aleksandr Grigoryev 761:North Crimean Canal 689:Aleksandr Grigoryev 658:Aleksandr Grigoryev 412:The Almightey Drill 158:lost in translation 2957:infobox referendum 2923:Referendum Infobox 862:Russia-Georgia war 280:mutually exclusive 276:voting regulations 3167: 2482:Tatar deportation 2478:History of Crimea 1908: 1875: 1308:inalienable right 1265:International law 896:On March 8, 2014 868:??? Or even with 535:What would change 85: 84: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3247: 3240: 3234: 3228: 3222: 3216: 3210: 3161: 2979: 2960: 2949: 2904: 2853:User:Polyglotism 2405: 2261: 2257: 2256: 2209: 2205: 2204: 2146: 2141: 2136: 2103: 2098: 2093: 1993: 1988: 1983: 1902: 1869: 1856: 1850: 1811: 1805: 1758: 1757: 1180:about 100 people 898:Russian military 498:Reaction Section 328: 327: 96:and date change 63: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3255: 3254: 3250: 3249: 3248: 3246: 3245: 3244: 3243: 3235: 3231: 3223: 3219: 3211: 3207: 3104: 3084: 3025: 2997: 2973: 2954: 2925: 2883: 2668:PGM-11 Redstone 2543: 2427:simple majority 2372: 2329: 2279: 2254: 2252: 2227: 2202: 2200: 2183: 2144: 2139: 2134: 2101: 2096: 2091: 1991: 1986: 1981: 1956: 1849: 1845: 1837: 1804: 1800: 1792: 1755: 1611: 1586: 1530:reliable source 1304:human construct 1267: 1243: 1016:Black Sea Fleet 557:Lokalkosmopolit 537: 500: 384: 362: 325: 278:). So they are 272:voting bulletin 206:Kilternkafuffle 197: 138:simple majority 117: 90: 59: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3253: 3251: 3242: 3241: 3229: 3217: 3204: 3203: 3202: 3201: 3200: 3182: 3179: 3172: 3171: 3119: 3118: 3114: 3103: 3100: 3089:178.168.173.91 3083: 3080: 3079: 3078: 3024: 3021: 3020: 3019: 3005:New York Times 2996: 2993: 2924: 2921: 2882: 2879: 2878: 2877: 2876: 2875: 2874: 2873: 2872: 2871: 2870: 2869: 2868: 2867: 2789: 2788: 2787: 2786: 2768: 2767: 2766: 2765: 2764: 2763: 2736: 2735: 2734: 2733: 2716: 2715: 2699: 2698: 2664:Nuremberg Laws 2585: 2584: 2542: 2539: 2538: 2537: 2536: 2535: 2520: 2519: 2501: 2500: 2384: 2383: 2380: 2371: 2370:Crimean Tatars 2368: 2367: 2366: 2328: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2278: 2275: 2274: 2273: 2226: 2223: 2222: 2221: 2182: 2179: 2168:Dragons flight 2164: 2163: 2162: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2151: 2017: 2016: 1998: 1955: 1952: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1846: 1836: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1801: 1791: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1752: 1610: 1607: 1585: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1543:109.60.127.225 1536: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1519: 1518: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1330: 1329: 1315: 1312: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1293: 1287: 1286: 1266: 1263: 1242: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1054: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1024:European Union 990: 989: 988: 987: 986: 985: 984: 983: 982: 981: 980: 979: 978: 977: 962: 902:Kherson Oblast 894: 893: 892: 891: 890: 889: 888: 887: 886: 885: 884: 769:Dnipropetrovsk 723: 722: 721: 700: 699: 698: 697: 696: 695: 694: 693: 679: 678: 677: 676: 675: 674: 673: 672: 671: 670: 669: 668: 638: 637: 636: 635: 634: 633: 613: 612: 611: 610: 609: 608: 599: 598: 597: 596: 578: 577: 576: 575: 568: 567: 536: 533: 532: 531: 499: 496: 495: 494: 493: 492: 491: 490: 489: 488: 474: 454: 453: 452: 451: 433: 432: 431: 430: 423: 422: 383: 380: 361: 358: 357: 356: 355: 354: 353: 352: 351: 350: 349: 348: 347: 346: 266:Yes, they are 231: 196: 193: 192: 191: 190: 189: 188: 187: 116: 115:Voting system? 113: 89: 86: 83: 82: 77: 74: 69: 64: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3252: 3238: 3233: 3230: 3226: 3221: 3218: 3214: 3209: 3206: 3199: 3195: 3191: 3186:Ukraine : --> 3183: 3180: 3176: 3175: 3174: 3173: 3170: 3165: 3160: 3159: 3153: 3152: 3151: 3149: 3145: 3141: 3140:174.19.174.16 3136: 3135: 3131: 3127: 3122: 3115: 3112: 3111: 3110: 3108: 3101: 3099: 3098: 3094: 3090: 3081: 3077: 3073: 3069: 3065: 3062: 3058: 3057: 3056: 3055: 3051: 3047: 3043: 3042:international 3039: 3038:is irrelevant 3035: 3031: 3022: 3018: 3014: 3010: 3006: 3002: 2999: 2998: 2994: 2992: 2991: 2987: 2983: 2977: 2976:infobox event 2971: 2967: 2965: 2958: 2952: 2948: 2943: 2942: 2938: 2934: 2930: 2922: 2920: 2919: 2915: 2911: 2907: 2903: 2898: 2897: 2893: 2889: 2880: 2866: 2862: 2858: 2857:174.19.174.16 2854: 2850: 2849: 2848: 2844: 2840: 2836: 2835: 2834: 2830: 2826: 2825:174.19.174.16 2822: 2818: 2814: 2809: 2808: 2807: 2806: 2805: 2801: 2797: 2793: 2792: 2791: 2790: 2785: 2781: 2777: 2772: 2771: 2770: 2769: 2762: 2758: 2754: 2750: 2746: 2742: 2741: 2740: 2739: 2738: 2737: 2732: 2728: 2724: 2720: 2719: 2718: 2717: 2714: 2710: 2706: 2701: 2700: 2697: 2693: 2689: 2685: 2681: 2677: 2673: 2669: 2665: 2661: 2657: 2656:Jim Crow Laws 2653: 2649: 2644: 2639: 2638: 2637: 2636: 2632: 2628: 2624: 2620: 2619: 2615: 2611: 2607: 2604: 2601: 2597: 2594: 2591: 2589: 2583: 2579: 2575: 2574:174.19.174.16 2571: 2570: 2569: 2568: 2564: 2560: 2556: 2552: 2548: 2540: 2534: 2530: 2526: 2522: 2521: 2518: 2514: 2510: 2505: 2504: 2503: 2502: 2499: 2495: 2491: 2487: 2483: 2479: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2468: 2464: 2459: 2456: 2452: 2448: 2445: 2441: 2439: 2438:vast majority 2435: 2434:supermajority 2430: 2428: 2424: 2420: 2416: 2410: 2408: 2404: 2399: 2398: 2394: 2390: 2381: 2377: 2376: 2375: 2369: 2365: 2361: 2357: 2353: 2352: 2351: 2350: 2346: 2342: 2338: 2334: 2326: 2322: 2318: 2314: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2307: 2303: 2299: 2293: 2292: 2288: 2284: 2276: 2272: 2268: 2264: 2260: 2251: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2244: 2240: 2236: 2232: 2224: 2220: 2216: 2212: 2208: 2199: 2198: 2197: 2196: 2192: 2188: 2180: 2178: 2177: 2173: 2169: 2150: 2147: 2142: 2137: 2131: 2127: 2126: 2125: 2121: 2117: 2113: 2109: 2108: 2107: 2104: 2099: 2094: 2088: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2078: 2074: 2070: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2059: 2055: 2051: 2047: 2043: 2039: 2038: 2037: 2033: 2029: 2025: 2021: 2020: 2019: 2018: 2015: 2011: 2007: 2003: 2002:in final form 1999: 1997: 1994: 1989: 1984: 1978: 1974: 1973: 1972: 1970: 1966: 1962: 1953: 1951: 1950: 1946: 1942: 1941:128.73.28.173 1938: 1934: 1930: 1926: 1922: 1911: 1906: 1901: 1900: 1894: 1893: 1892: 1888: 1884: 1880: 1879: 1878: 1873: 1868: 1867: 1862: 1861: 1860: 1859: 1855: 1851: 1848: 1842: 1839:According to 1834: 1829: 1825: 1821: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1810: 1806: 1803: 1797: 1789: 1773: 1769: 1765: 1761: 1753: 1751: 1747: 1743: 1739: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1728: 1724: 1719: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1695: 1691: 1686: 1685: 1684: 1680: 1676: 1672: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1662: 1658: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1647: 1643: 1639: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1632: 1628: 1624: 1620: 1619:in good faith 1616: 1608: 1606: 1604: 1600: 1596: 1592: 1583: 1575: 1571: 1567: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1557: 1552: 1548: 1544: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1531: 1527: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1520: 1517: 1513: 1509: 1505: 1502: 1498: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1479: 1475: 1470: 1468: 1464: 1460: 1456: 1452: 1448: 1443: 1441: 1426: 1422: 1418: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1396: 1392: 1388: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1369: 1365: 1361: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1347: 1343: 1339: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1328: 1324: 1320: 1316: 1313: 1309: 1305: 1301: 1300: 1294: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1277: 1273: 1272:94.253.155.89 1264: 1262: 1261: 1257: 1253: 1248: 1240: 1230: 1226: 1222: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1199: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1181: 1178:Orestes1984, 1177: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1169: 1165: 1161: 1157: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1135: 1130: 1122: 1118: 1114: 1110: 1107: 1097: 1093: 1089: 1084: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1068: 1067: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1062: 1045: 1041: 1037: 1033: 1029: 1028:Baltic states 1025: 1021: 1017: 1013: 1009: 1006: 1005: 1004: 1003: 1002: 1001: 1000: 999: 998: 997: 996: 995: 994: 993: 992: 991: 976: 972: 968: 963: 959: 953: 950: 949: 948: 947: 946: 942: 938: 934: 930: 926: 923: 922: 921: 920: 919: 915: 911: 907: 903: 899: 895: 883: 879: 875: 871: 867: 863: 859: 855: 851: 848: 847: 846: 842: 838: 833: 832: 831: 827: 823: 819: 815: 812: 811: 810: 809: 808: 804: 800: 796: 792: 788: 787:United States 784: 783: 782: 778: 774: 770: 766: 762: 758: 757:Yuriy Meshkov 755: 751: 747: 743: 739: 735: 731: 727: 724: 720: 716: 712: 708: 707: 706: 705: 704: 703: 702: 701: 690: 687: 686: 685: 684: 683: 682: 681: 680: 667: 663: 659: 654: 650: 649: 648: 647: 646: 645: 644: 643: 642: 641: 640: 639: 632: 628: 624: 619: 618: 617: 616: 615: 614: 605: 604: 603: 602: 601: 600: 595: 591: 587: 582: 581: 580: 579: 572: 571: 570: 569: 566: 562: 558: 553: 552: 551: 550: 546: 542: 541:94.253.204.88 534: 529: 525: 521: 517: 516: 515: 514: 510: 506: 505:24.114.70.179 497: 487: 483: 479: 475: 472: 468: 467: 464: 460: 459: 458: 457: 456: 455: 450: 446: 442: 437: 436: 435: 434: 427: 426: 425: 424: 421: 417: 413: 408: 407: 406: 405: 401: 397: 392: 388: 379: 378: 374: 370: 369:174.19.174.16 365: 359: 345: 341: 337: 333: 332: 323: 322: 321: 317: 313: 309: 308: 307: 303: 299: 295: 294: 293: 289: 285: 281: 277: 273: 269: 265: 264: 263: 259: 255: 250: 249: 248: 244: 240: 236: 232: 230: 226: 222: 218: 217: 216: 215: 211: 207: 202: 194: 186: 182: 178: 174: 173: 172: 168: 164: 159: 155: 154: 153: 149: 145: 141: 139: 134: 133: 132: 131: 127: 123: 114: 112: 110: 106: 102: 98: 95: 87: 81: 78: 75: 73: 70: 68: 65: 62: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3232: 3220: 3208: 3156: 3137: 3123: 3120: 3105: 3085: 3060: 3041: 3037: 3029: 3026: 2995:Developments 2963: 2950: 2944: 2926: 2905: 2899: 2884: 2816: 2812: 2744: 2705:Marcus Graly 2683: 2625: 2621: 2608: 2605: 2602: 2598: 2595: 2592: 2590:] on NPOV: 2586: 2544: 2460: 2457: 2453: 2449: 2442: 2437: 2431: 2422: 2418: 2414: 2411: 2406: 2400: 2385: 2373: 2336: 2332: 2330: 2294: 2280: 2258: 2234: 2230: 2228: 2206: 2184: 2165: 2112:Saar Statute 2001: 1957: 1933:join Ukraine 1932: 1928: 1924: 1920: 1918: 1897: 1864: 1844: 1838: 1835:New question 1799: 1793: 1759: 1671:Soviet Union 1637: 1612: 1587: 1477: 1473: 1471: 1444: 1437: 1268: 1244: 1034:population. 956: 900:invaded the 870:Transnistria 858:South Osetia 730:World War II 538: 501: 470: 462: 439:position -- 393: 389: 385: 366: 363: 329: 267: 233: 198: 135: 118: 93: 91: 60: 43: 37: 3190:Truther2012 3126:Ahnoneemoos 3117:referendum. 2982:Ahnoneemoos 2933:Truther2012 2910:Ahnoneemoos 2839:Truther2012 2821:Irredentism 2796:Truther2012 2776:Truther2012 2723:Truther2012 2627:Polyglotism 2610:Polyglotism 2525:Truther2012 2509:Ahnoneemoos 2490:Truther2012 2463:Ahnoneemoos 2389:Truther2012 2356:Truther2012 2341:Truther2012 2313:Truther2012 2263:Truther2012 2239:Truther2012 2211:Truther2012 2187:Truther2012 2054:Truther2012 2006:Ahnoneemoos 1929:join Russia 1764:Ahnoneemoos 1742:Truther2012 1704:Truther2012 1675:Ahnoneemoos 1657:Truther2012 1642:Truther2012 1623:Ahnoneemoos 1566:Ahnoneemoos 1417:Ahnoneemoos 1360:Ahnoneemoos 1319:Ahnoneemoos 1109:Orestes1984 1088:Orestes1984 1018:raided the 1008:Orestes1984 967:Orestes1984 925:Orestes1984 850:Orestes1984 818:the Kremlin 814:Orestes1984 726:Orestes1984 711:Orestes1984 653:Orestes1984 623:Orestes1984 441:Orestes1984 396:Orestes1984 298:Ahnoneemoos 282:by design. 254:Ahnoneemoos 239:Ahnoneemoos 163:Ahnoneemoos 144:Ahnoneemoos 88:Date change 36:This is an 3023:Legitimacy 2672:V-2 rocket 2606:Regards, 2181:Sevastopol 1760:Suggestion 1501:unilateral 1459:UNSCR 1244 1160:Euromaidan 1032:Russophone 929:Russophone 3158:Львівське 2964:yes or no 2888:'''tAD''' 2753:bender235 2688:bender235 2682:; ) does 2660:Apartheid 2559:bender235 2333:POV check 2298:Tlhslobus 2042:Number 57 1959:article.( 1899:Львівське 1866:Львівське 1723:Tlhslobus 1690:Tlhslobus 1508:Tlhslobus 1482:Tlhslobus 1387:Tlhslobus 1338:Tlhslobus 1252:Tlhslobus 1221:Tlhslobus 1156:Venezuela 746:Uzbek SSR 586:Tlhslobus 221:Kiralexis 122:Nil Einne 80:Archive 5 72:Archive 3 67:Archive 2 61:Archive 1 3164:говорити 3107:@Lvivske 2419:forcible 2415:decimate 2407:Disagree 1905:говорити 1872:говорити 856:and the 854:Abkhazia 651:What??? 2128:Again: 1796:Article 1524:So, is 1474:HOWEVER 933:Russian 931:ethnic 927:, I am 765:Dnieper 336:Seryo93 312:Seryo93 284:Seryo93 268:options 177:Seryo93 94:process 39:archive 2966:format 2643:rigged 2572:agree 2551:rigged 2135:Number 2116:Wester 2092:Number 2073:Wester 2050:Lihaas 2046:Wester 2028:Lihaas 1982:Number 1961:Lihaas 1883:Wester 1820:Lihaas 1638:modern 1615:boldly 1595:Lihaas 795:Alaska 791:Alaska 520:Lihaas 478:Lihaas 360:"some" 101:Lihaas 3178:here. 3061:prior 2951:Fixed 2906:Fixed 2811:: --> 2810:: --> 2676:Gulag 2040:Dear 1937:WP:OR 1931:, or 1896:KP.-- 1738:RSFSR 1590:: --> 1589:: --> 1584:Links 860:(see 463:claim 16:< 3194:talk 3144:talk 3130:talk 3093:talk 3072:talk 3050:talk 3013:talk 2986:talk 2937:talk 2914:talk 2892:talk 2861:talk 2843:talk 2829:talk 2800:talk 2780:talk 2757:talk 2751:. -- 2727:talk 2709:talk 2692:talk 2631:talk 2614:talk 2578:talk 2563:talk 2555:also 2529:talk 2513:talk 2494:talk 2467:talk 2421:and 2393:talk 2379:ago. 2360:talk 2345:talk 2335:and 2317:talk 2302:talk 2287:talk 2267:talk 2259:Done 2243:talk 2215:talk 2207:Done 2191:talk 2172:talk 2120:talk 2077:talk 2058:talk 2048:and 2032:talk 2010:talk 1965:talk 1954:Move 1945:talk 1887:talk 1841:this 1824:talk 1768:talk 1746:talk 1727:talk 1708:talk 1694:talk 1679:talk 1661:talk 1646:talk 1627:talk 1617:and 1599:talk 1570:talk 1547:talk 1512:talk 1486:talk 1465:and 1421:talk 1391:talk 1364:talk 1342:talk 1323:talk 1314:HTH, 1276:talk 1256:talk 1247:here 1225:talk 1188:talk 1168:talk 1146:talk 1136:and 1117:talk 1092:talk 1040:talk 971:talk 941:talk 914:talk 878:talk 841:talk 826:talk 803:talk 777:talk 715:talk 662:talk 627:talk 590:talk 561:talk 545:talk 524:talk 509:talk 482:talk 471:find 445:talk 416:talk 400:talk 373:talk 340:talk 331:Done 316:talk 302:talk 288:talk 258:talk 243:talk 225:talk 210:talk 181:talk 167:talk 148:talk 126:talk 105:talk 3030:not 3003:by 2745:all 2684:not 2071:.-- 1971:). 1921:ask 1718:CNN 1605:). 1478:BUT 908:). 111:). 3196:) 3150:) 3146:) 3132:) 3095:) 3074:) 3066:. 3052:) 3015:) 3007:. 2988:) 2978:}} 2974:{{ 2959:}} 2955:{{ 2939:) 2916:) 2894:) 2863:) 2845:) 2831:) 2823:. 2817:If 2802:) 2782:) 2774:-- 2759:) 2729:) 2711:) 2694:) 2678:→ 2674:; 2670:→ 2666:; 2662:→ 2658:→ 2654:; 2650:→ 2633:) 2616:) 2580:) 2565:) 2531:) 2515:) 2496:) 2469:) 2429:. 2395:) 2387:-- 2362:) 2347:) 2319:) 2304:) 2289:) 2269:) 2245:) 2217:) 2193:) 2174:) 2122:) 2079:) 2060:) 2044:, 2034:) 2012:) 1979:. 1967:) 1947:) 1889:) 1830:). 1826:) 1770:) 1748:) 1729:) 1710:) 1696:) 1681:) 1663:) 1648:) 1629:) 1601:) 1572:) 1549:) 1514:) 1488:) 1469:. 1445:A 1423:) 1393:) 1366:) 1344:) 1325:) 1278:) 1258:) 1227:) 1190:) 1170:) 1148:) 1140:. 1119:) 1094:) 1042:) 973:) 943:) 916:) 880:) 843:) 828:) 805:) 779:) 717:) 664:) 629:) 592:) 563:) 547:) 530:). 526:) 511:) 484:) 447:) 418:) 402:) 375:) 342:) 334:. 318:) 304:) 290:) 260:) 245:) 227:) 212:) 183:) 169:) 150:) 140:). 128:) 107:) 76:→ 3192:( 3166:) 3162:( 3142:( 3128:( 3124:— 3091:( 3070:( 3048:( 3011:( 2984:( 2935:( 2912:( 2890:( 2859:( 2841:( 2827:( 2798:( 2778:( 2755:( 2725:( 2707:( 2690:( 2629:( 2612:( 2576:( 2561:( 2527:( 2511:( 2507:— 2492:( 2465:( 2461:— 2391:( 2358:( 2343:( 2315:( 2300:( 2285:( 2265:( 2241:( 2213:( 2189:( 2170:( 2145:7 2140:5 2118:( 2102:7 2097:5 2075:( 2056:( 2030:( 2026:. 2008:( 1992:7 1987:5 1963:( 1943:( 1907:) 1903:( 1885:( 1874:) 1870:( 1822:( 1766:( 1744:( 1725:( 1706:( 1692:( 1677:( 1659:( 1644:( 1625:( 1597:( 1593:( 1568:( 1545:( 1532:? 1510:( 1484:( 1419:( 1389:( 1362:( 1340:( 1321:( 1317:— 1274:( 1254:( 1223:( 1186:( 1166:( 1144:( 1115:( 1090:( 1038:( 969:( 939:( 912:( 876:( 839:( 824:( 801:( 775:( 713:( 660:( 625:( 588:( 559:( 543:( 522:( 507:( 480:( 443:( 414:( 398:( 371:( 338:( 314:( 300:( 286:( 256:( 252:— 241:( 237:— 223:( 208:( 179:( 165:( 146:( 142:— 124:( 103:( 99:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index