Knowledge

Talk:2022 South Lanarkshire Council election/GA1

Source 📝

680: 655: 634: 594: 568: 545: 524: 498: 474: 451: 422: 390: 353: 42: 727:
Citations, I've updated access-dates (opened them to check them and added todays date). However, I don't know the publication date for all of them as it does not appear on the website. Regarding source 9, what should the access-date be? I can't check the original as it doesn't exist anymore so is it
731:
Most of the Daily Record sources weren't actually published by the Daily Record. The way Reach Plc works in Scotland, all the local newspaper websites were subsumed into the main Daily Record website a good few years ago so they were actually published by the Hamilton Advertiser, East Kilbride News
723:
Re- images. I know the council publish photos of the councillors on their website and these have been used elsewhere on Knowledge but I'm not 100 per cent sure on the copyright/fair use reasoning behind it. The Robert Brown image is a Scottish Government image so is covered by Crown Copyright, I
685:
Holding for now. The lack of citations for the one paragraph in the candidates section is the only policy-based thing holding it back, the rest of my notes are relatively minor. Ping me when you've addressed this and I'll be happy to pass this article. Nice work.
719:
Thanks for reviewing the article, it's very much appreciated. Your feedback was pretty much what I was expecting as I had based this on another GA. I've worked through most of your comments, I have a couple of questions though (nothing major).
732:
and Rutherglen Reformer. Lanarkshire Live has also been part of the Lanarkshire papers group in the last couple of years. Essentially, they are be editorially independent of the Daily Record even though they are published on the same website.
47: 768:
With all my concerns addressed, I'd be happy to pass this review now. Cheers for taking the time! Feel free to update me if you see any progress on councillor images, I'd be curious to see how that works out. --
126: 122: 107: 52: 99: 380: 80: 115: 70: 17: 760:
Listing today as the access date is fine for archived copies, I'm pretty sure. If there's no publication date available, then don't worry about that part.
624: 757:
appears to suggest these images are copy-written, so you may have to contact them directly if you want authorisation to use the images for Knowledge.
445: 384: 376: 92: 368: 440:, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or 317:
If only Robert Brown has an image available, it might be worth just removing the images fields in order to slim the infobox down a bit.
327: 441: 197:
If there's going to be a prose paragraph telling us all of these details, I don't think a table repeating the results is necessary.
372: 75: 468: 156: 339:
Very informative article about a local election I didn't know much about. Well-written and put-together, for the most part.
272:
Spotcheck: They fielded four in this election, might be worth clarifying that a bit, rather than just having it in brackets.
742: 179:
It says the SNP failed to get a majority, so did they form a minority administration or a coalition with another party?
358:
Only a couple very minor grammatical quibbles here and there. Try and make sure longer sentences are broken up a bit.
628: 462:
is affiliated with Scottish Labour, so double-check to make sure no editorial bias has made its way in from there.
645: 433: 364: 738: 616: 427:
A couple of the citations are incomplete, missing publication and access dates. Make sure these are filled out.
778: 746: 695: 160: 620: 539: 458: 404: 535: 518: 456:
All citations are either from reliable publications or official election channels. I will note that the
724:
don't know if this extends to local councils though. Any advice you have on that would be appreciated.
492: 488: 660:
I'm slightly concerned that the inclusion of only one image in the infobox may lean towards being
774: 691: 649: 588: 150: 444:, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the 415:
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
608: 227:
Spotcheck: Some of the councillors give clear reasons, others are a bit more vague about it.
661: 331: 565:
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
558: 416: 770: 714: 687: 256: 146: 265:
So wait, did they field four candidates in this election or two? It's a bit unclear.
437: 599:
Last reversions occurred in May 2022, which is to be expected during an election.
207:
Thinking this subsection could maybe be moved down, below "Retiring councillors"
350:
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
754: 587:
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
573:
Broadly neutral, any non-neutral statements are properly attributed.
218:"who resigned from their respective parties to become independents" 763:
Oh that's interesting, I had no idea! Thanks for letting me know.
249:
First paragraph is currently uncited, this needs to be fixed.
529:
There's one or two context holes, but they're easily filled.
639:
Only image is licensed through the Open Government License
395:
Only one case of a word to watch, very easily dealt with.
259:, so maybe just start a new sentence to talk about UKIP. 134: 103: 728:still today as I checked the archived version? 664:, but it's certainly relevant to the subject. 263:"only fielded half as many candidates (four)" 8: 190:, says they formed a minority administration 18:Talk:2022 South Lanarkshire Council election 538:without going into unnecessary detail (see 482:Fully cited, spotchecks reveal no clear OR. 480:One of the paragraphs is currently uncited. 30: 751:No bother at all! As to your questions: 61: 33: 262: 253:"but the UK Independence Party (UKIP)" 252: 217: 7: 606:Is it illustrated, if possible, by 314:Could be a comma after 5 May 2022. 24: 755:South Lanarkshire council website 503:No obvious copyvio or plagiarism. 220:Any details on why they resigned? 678: 653: 632: 592: 566: 543: 522: 496: 472: 449: 420: 388: 351: 446:scientific citation guidelines 1: 625:valid non-free use rationales 679: 654: 633: 593: 567: 544: 523: 497: 473: 450: 421: 389: 352: 803: 417:the layout style guideline 337: 255:Why "but"? Note this is a 779:13:26, 31 July 2023 (UTC) 747:13:07, 31 July 2023 (UTC) 696:10:53, 31 July 2023 (UTC) 186:Spotcheck: Source 4, the 161:10:53, 31 July 2023 (UTC) 363:B. It complies with the 648:to the topic, and have 442:likely to be challenged 512:broad in its coverage 591:or content dispute: 536:focused on the topic 517:A. It addresses the 489:copyright violations 469:no original research 410:no original research 234:Retiring councillors 739:Stevie fae Scotland 487:D. It contains no 481: 385:list incorporation 650:suitable captions 627:are provided for 479: 434:in-line citations 174:Previous election 89: 88: 794: 718: 682: 681: 657: 656: 636: 635: 629:non-free content 621:copyright status 596: 595: 570: 569: 547: 546: 526: 525: 500: 499: 476: 475: 453: 452: 438:reliable sources 424: 423: 392: 391: 355: 354: 309:Lead and infobox 202:Electoral system 139: 130: 111: 43:Copyvio detector 31: 802: 801: 797: 796: 795: 793: 792: 791: 712: 467:C. It contains 367:guidelines for 365:manual of style 324: 311: 301: 291: 281: 246: 236: 214: 204: 176: 171: 120: 97: 91: 85: 57: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 800: 798: 790: 789: 788: 787: 786: 785: 784: 783: 782: 781: 766: 765: 764: 761: 758: 737:Thanks again, 735: 734: 733: 729: 725: 703: 702: 701: 700: 699: 698: 677:Pass or Fail: 669: 668: 667: 666: 665: 644:B. Images are 642: 641: 640: 615:A. Images are 604: 603: 602: 601: 600: 578: 577: 576: 575: 574: 554: 553: 552: 551: 550: 532: 531: 530: 521:of the topic: 508: 507: 506: 505: 504: 485: 484: 483: 465: 464: 463: 430: 429: 428: 400: 399: 398: 397: 396: 377:words to watch 361: 360: 359: 323: 320: 319: 318: 315: 310: 307: 306: 305: 300: 297: 296: 295: 290: 287: 286: 285: 280: 277: 276: 275: 274: 273: 267: 266: 260: 250: 245: 242: 241: 240: 235: 232: 231: 230: 229: 228: 222: 221: 213: 210: 209: 208: 203: 200: 199: 198: 194: 193: 192: 191: 181: 180: 175: 172: 170: 167: 165: 140: 87: 86: 84: 83: 78: 73: 67: 64: 63: 59: 58: 56: 55: 53:External links 50: 45: 39: 36: 35: 28: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 799: 780: 776: 772: 767: 762: 759: 756: 753: 752: 750: 749: 748: 744: 740: 736: 730: 726: 722: 721: 716: 711: 710: 709: 708: 707: 706: 705: 704: 697: 693: 689: 684: 683: 676: 675: 673: 670: 663: 659: 658: 651: 647: 643: 638: 637: 630: 626: 622: 618: 614: 613: 611: 610: 605: 598: 597: 590: 586: 585: 583: 579: 572: 571: 564: 563: 561: 560: 555: 549: 548: 541: 540:summary style 537: 533: 528: 527: 520: 516: 515: 513: 509: 502: 501: 494: 490: 486: 478: 477: 470: 466: 461: 460: 455: 454: 447: 443: 439: 435: 431: 426: 425: 418: 414: 413: 411: 407: 406: 401: 394: 393: 386: 382: 378: 374: 370: 369:lead sections 366: 362: 357: 356: 349: 348: 346: 342: 341: 340: 336: 335: 333: 330:review – see 329: 321: 316: 313: 312: 308: 303: 302: 298: 293: 292: 288: 283: 282: 279:Controversies 278: 271: 270: 269: 268: 264: 261: 258: 257:word to watch 254: 251: 248: 247: 243: 238: 237: 233: 226: 225: 224: 223: 219: 216: 215: 211: 206: 205: 201: 196: 195: 189: 185: 184: 183: 182: 178: 177: 173: 168: 166: 163: 162: 158: 155: 152: 148: 145: 141: 138: 137: 133: 128: 124: 119: 118: 114: 109: 105: 101: 96: 95: 82: 79: 77: 74: 72: 69: 68: 66: 65: 60: 54: 51: 49: 46: 44: 41: 40: 38: 37: 32: 26: 19: 671: 607: 581: 557: 534:B. It stays 519:main aspects 511: 459:Daily Record 457: 409: 403: 345:well written 344: 338: 334:for criteria 326: 325: 188:Daily Record 187: 164: 153: 143: 142: 135: 131: 117:Article talk 116: 112: 93: 90: 81:Instructions 619:with their 212:Composition 104:visual edit 493:plagiarism 405:verifiable 244:Candidates 169:Background 48:Authorship 34:GA toolbox 436:are from 322:Checklist 299:Aftermath 144:Reviewer: 71:Templates 62:Reviewing 27:GA Review 771:Grnrchst 715:Grnrchst 688:Grnrchst 646:relevant 589:edit war 332:WP:WIAGA 304:No notes 294:No notes 284:No notes 239:No notes 157:contribs 147:Grnrchst 76:Criteria 672:Overall 559:neutral 432:B. All 381:fiction 289:Results 127:history 108:history 94:Article 623:, and 617:tagged 609:images 582:stable 580:Is it 556:Is it 510:Is it 402:Is it 383:, and 373:layout 343:Is it 662:undue 408:with 136:Watch 16:< 775:talk 743:talk 692:talk 491:nor 151:talk 123:edit 100:edit 542:): 777:) 745:) 694:) 686:-- 674:: 652:: 631:: 612:? 584:? 562:? 514:? 495:: 471:: 448:: 419:: 412:? 387:: 379:, 375:, 371:, 347:? 328:GA 159:) 125:| 106:| 102:| 773:( 741:( 717:: 713:@ 690:( 154:· 149:( 132:· 129:) 121:( 113:· 110:) 98:(

Index

Talk:2022 South Lanarkshire Council election
Copyvio detector
Authorship
External links
Templates
Criteria
Instructions
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
Grnrchst
talk
contribs
10:53, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
word to watch
GA
WP:WIAGA
manual of style
lead sections
layout
words to watch
fiction
list incorporation
verifiable
the layout style guideline

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.