571:
559:
725:
867:
190:
846:
477:
326:
450:
487:
774:
753:
635:
607:
285:
645:
955:
378:
357:
877:
987:
705:
2637:
I don't know how to add this or the images that go along with it, any help would be great: There were two additional
Official posters for the 86th Academy Awards. One titled "Liquid" and the other titled "Spotlight" designed by ad agency 180LA and done by artist Casey Leveque of Rocket Studio. Here
2587:
I understand your concern, but I think trying to demote Oscar ceremony featured lists just because of a conflict that is easy to solve (simply by putting a dagger) is kind of a lousy reason to do so. What would be better is to try to set some standard for future FL's by creating compromise. I really
1770:
Yep they don't-I can see why they got rid of that section, not sure why it was there so long-then again I found the most amusing thing to be on a Oscar page for years and years-one of the winners for
Assistant director was someone who never won, had no page and no listing on the Oscar site, I had to
1494:
and reference posts, especially if they were of featured status. But, they are not hard and fast "requirements" as to how every subsequent article should be. In other words, if this article does not exactly "match" the older (previous) ones, that does not render its format as "improper". Agreed?
1515:
One of the original nominations for Best Song was revoked by the
Academy. Should we leave the song in the chart, with an explanatory footnote? Or should we just remove it from the chart altogether? It seems to me that the former option is better. What has been our practice in past ceremonies?
1019:
I'm not sure if this is a reason to change the article title. If you Google
Academy Awards, there are numerous news headlines that still use that term. They seem interchangeable to me. I would say it is better to wait till after the ceremony to see what kind of naming goes on. Knowledge is supposed
2541:
nominate the article for featured list removal, but I'd rather the article be made accessible instead. In the meantime, perhaps I need to add nominations for featured lists to my watchlist and raise objections on any accessibility issues before the list gets featured. Following the manual of style
1077:
Okay. As for your concern about Oscars vs. Academy Awards, they still use both names to refer to the awards. The reason why AMPAS now uses 'The Oscars' more often is that producer Meron and Zadan wanted to refer to the ceremony as such without using the full name. However, the
Academy Awards are
1151:
under the characters "12" ... or do we want it alphabetized under the letter "T" as if the "twelve" were spelled out? Edits are going back and forth on this, so I'd like us to agree one way or the other; then all editors can uniformly stick with this decision. And – whatever we decide – for
1531:
I added the revoked nomination back into the chart, with an explanatory footnote. Let's leave it that way, until we get a consensus here on the matter. I am not sure that I did the format of the footnote exactly correctly. Perhaps someone can clean that up a bit. Thanks.
1660:
I agree. "Alone Yet Not Alone" does not have an
Academy Award nomination. Either it should not be on the list, or it should be written in strikethrough text. A simple footnote does not immediately give the reader the information that this is *not* an Academy Award nomination.
1568:. That approach might work.. I don't think your footnote is the right approach, it should be evident in the box itself.. perhaps have small text at the bottom explaining the film was disqualified? I think revoked is the proper word also, as it means reversing after the fact.
1439:
On these charts, can someone "left justify" (instead of "center justify") the columns for "Film", "Name", and "Award
Categories"? (And keep the columns for "Number of Nominations" as "centered".) I think it would look better, but I am not sure how to do this. Thanks.
1817:
Somebody need to mention that this was the first
Academy Awards Ceremony that streamed live to mobile devices and ABC's website, as we mentioned the Oscar's first televised, first broadcasted on the radio, first in color, last in black and white, first live, etc.
1840:
As IP edits are sometimes automatically reverted, I'll just note here that, despite it being included in the introduction to the section, the actual recipient of the Jean
Hersholt Award, Angelina Jolie, was omitted from the awards list, so I have added it now.
2528:(and thank you for introducing me to a useful template) It is tiring to get involved in an edit war, and that is not part of my vision for Knowledge. At the very least there needs to be someone in addition to me reverting the removal of the double-daggers.
2498:. In reality, they all should have double daggers or some other symbol for accessibility in order to pass for Featured list. I'm reluctant to do so because I keep getting into an edit war. You have my blessing to do so for the other Oscar featured lists.
2724:
the In
Memorial list has the deceased party's name listed with his profession. Someone added a movie example of the artist and I agree that should be deleted. I am going to restore the list but only with the professions noted. Tell me if I am wrong.
2332:
What do you think? Which of the two you think is suited in the context of a Featured list? Or is there a third method? If you do, show it here and we'll vote. IO believe there should be consistency among all the Oscar ceremony
1360:
Thanks. It has happened a few times. I'd have to look in the "edit history". If I recall correctly, the editor did not have a User Name; they just had that long string of numbers (anonymous user / IP address). Thanks.
2466:
While it is clear that a winner immediately follows the name of an award, it may be ambiguous as to when the winning information is completed. Following the bold section with a double-dagger makes the end point clear.
153:
1489:
article with additional details, facts, and information, we should not be precluded from doing so on the basis of "well, that's is not how it was done in the 72nd article". Do you agree? The past articles are good
1696:
Just noticed someone got rid of it-I think that probably was just someone guessing-as it seemed to be a bit too many when it comes down to the In Memorium (Which IMO should be longer for once, after snubbing
1720:
I think there was too much speculation on who would be included. Probably best to leave it till we know for sure. Do they announce the people they intend to include in the "In Memoriam" part beforehand?
2748:
268:
204:
1860:
9 nominations-but I can't find a place that has a link to it-but he has the most nominations ever in that cat to date. (I was just updating the sound editing and noticed that the data was wrong on it)
1082:
the award itself is still officially known as the Academy Award for merit. So even if the ceremony is refereed to as the Oscars, the names Academy Award and Oscars are still used interchangeably. --
933:
432:
2470:
The only reason given in the history for reverting the accessible code was "only Featured lists use bold." Being a featured list does not exempt the list from meeting accessibility requirements.
584:
460:
1905:
Reverted removal of AccessibilityDispute template as the issue has not been settled yet. There is a concern that a featured article has accessibility issues. The discussion is still ongoing at
2368:
Thank you. I also prefer the first because for William Ross's performance the word Orchestral does not fit the description of Song(s) since Orchestral is not the name of any specific song.--
2701:
In the Critical Reviews section, it says "The review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes gave the show a 82% approval rating, with an average rating of 0/10, based on 11 reviews." Is this correct?
2463:
Indicating winners solely with boldface is not accessible to some screen readers. That is, the screen reader may not necessarily read bold text aloud differently from non-bold text.
2607:
I have no objection to bold and daggers. I'm not sure how the bold got removed, unless it was part of the undo process. But you're right, it's separate for the 87th Awards issue.
2588:
don't want this conflict to further slow down the FLC process for the 87th Oscars. I wonder if both the daggers and the boldface can be used simultaneously to please both parties.
734:
621:
249:
147:
714:
617:
2863:
2793:
2664:
2823:
2788:
589:
2778:
549:
539:
303:
44:
2818:
968:
79:
2546:
a requirement of featured lists. (So is not being part of an edit war, but I'm not going to start one to get this article off the featured lists list.)
1233:, which says various approaches can be used. However, I think a good rule of thumb to follow is how wikitables automatically sort titles. If you go to
2813:
2798:
1906:
2763:
2753:
422:
994:
2853:
2808:
2783:
923:
828:
2838:
2773:
818:
515:
85:
1822:
1668:
1594:
I would omit it completely, and add a small note linking to the Best Song controversy section. If the nomination's revoked, it's revoked.
2858:
2843:
1842:
2828:
2561:
2758:
2639:
398:
2350:
Option 1, unquestionably. I'm not sure why there is such disagreement when the similar format has been used across numerous FLs. -
1143:
This seems to be a recurring issue, so let's create a consensus here and then move on to other matters. Do we want the film title
168:
2848:
1880:
899:
794:
500:
455:
997:. Knowledge seems to be one of the few sites still referring to the Oscars by their traditional name. Is it time for a rethink?
135:
2833:
2803:
2675:
1234:
663:
99:
30:
2454:
2190:
1986:
104:
20:
1271:
Thanks. I am fine with either way, although I'd tend to agree with your preference. The alphabetical order for this film (
2665:
http://www.broadwayworld.com/bwwdance/article/Rocket-Studio-Artist-Casey-Leveque-Creates-Poster-Art-for-the-Oscars-20140226
2249:
2051:
675:
667:
74:
2274:
2079:
385:
362:
337:
1928:
In the last few days, there was disagreement between how the table format should look. I wanted it to look like this:
1633:
1555:
1537:
1521:
1500:
1445:
1412:
1366:
1280:
1202:
1161:
890:
851:
790:
786:
781:
758:
209:
65:
1399:
Per the above discussion, I changed the alphabetical ordering back, so that numbers like "12" and "20" (for example,
129:
1331:
1250:
1180:
1033:
1006:
671:
658:
612:
576:
1470:
BTW, I'm going to clean up this list sometime in April in order to submit it for featured list status in August.--
1194:
1042:
Fair enough. I'm fairly convinced 'Oscars' will be the standard some day soon, considering its hashtaggability.
125:
2768:
2612:
2569:
2551:
2494:: Actually, you are very correct. In fact, there are several Oscar featured lists with a double dagger such as
2477:
1914:
1896:
1826:
1749:
1672:
1464:
199:
1275:) has been changed several times. I think we just need to agree to some consensus on the issue. Thanks.
2318:
2244:
2165:
2129:
2046:
1953:
1846:
961:
325:
189:
109:
175:
2686:
2598:
2508:
2444:
2373:
2338:
1629:
1551:
1533:
1517:
1496:
1475:
1441:
1408:
1362:
1307:
1276:
1221:
1198:
1157:
1118:
1087:
2426:
which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —
1830:
2643:
2391:
2294:
2102:
343:
213:
1794:
1754:
1739:
1723:
1664:
1599:
1573:
1485:
Yes, but that's not to say that we are required to mimic those articles 100%. If we want to improve
1101:
1079:
1068:
1053:
1047:
1002:
297:
1171:
It should be the number, meaning that it should come before A-Z. That is how it is normally sorted.
2730:
2721:
2608:
2582:
2565:
2547:
2495:
2489:
2473:
2423:
1910:
1892:
1888:
1565:
1460:
1021:
724:
558:
161:
55:
24:
1096:
Ah, interesting. It's true 'Academy Award' still has that air of prestige. Thanks for clarifying.
898:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
514:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
397:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2405:
2386:
Also option one. There are numerous possible roles that can be filled. We need to be explicit. —
2355:
2323:
2134:
141:
70:
2638:
is the link to a high res jpg of one poster And here is a link to a high res jpg of the other
284:
2594:
2523:
2504:
2369:
2334:
2181:
1974:
1471:
1114:
1083:
492:
217:
51:
2706:
2676:
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/2b/f2/a9/2bf2a9eb5433cabc6296e7c007724f8f.jpg
2387:
2269:
2074:
1020:
to follow, not lead, in these cases. If you want additional input, you can post a notice at
1564:
The most recent example of something similar was with the foreign language category at the
2195:
1991:
1865:
1776:
1735:
1710:
1595:
1569:
1097:
1064:
1043:
1014:
998:
1113:"Academy Awards" sounds more formal than "Oscars", which sounds like merely a nickname.
2726:
1702:
1327:
1246:
1176:
1029:
866:
845:
2742:
2427:
2401:
2351:
2260:
2219:
2062:
2018:
1879:
The list of nominees appears to be using a table for layout purposes, a violation of
1698:
1316:
2309:
2285:
2117:
2090:
1550:
And, while we are at it, is the correct word "revoked" or "rescinded"? Thanks.
882:
476:
449:
662:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can
2702:
2213:
2009:
650:
1771:
go though the history and it was listed as wrong since...are your ready? 2007!
2734:
2710:
2647:
2616:
2602:
2573:
2555:
2512:
2481:
2430:
2409:
2395:
2377:
2359:
2342:
2224:
2023:
1918:
1900:
1869:
1861:
1850:
1800:
1780:
1772:
1760:
1743:
1729:
1714:
1706:
1676:
1637:
1603:
1577:
1559:
1541:
1525:
1504:
1479:
1449:
1416:
1370:
1335:
1284:
1254:
1206:
1184:
1165:
1122:
1105:
1091:
1072:
1057:
1037:
872:
640:
634:
606:
566:
510:
505:
482:
1323:
1242:
1230:
1172:
1156:, nominated in the Best Feature Documentary category. Thoughts? Thanks.
1025:
960:
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the
773:
752:
291:
1197:(or elsewhere) about this? I could not seem to find anything. Thanks.
1226:
679:
1792:
That's quite a mistake! Thinking we should maybe check them all now...--
377:
356:
2687:
https://biggiesplace.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/oscars-poster-2014.jpg
2206:
2002:
2400:
Also the first option, we need to be clear about roles in the table.
1705:
gets a special one. So what has been confirmed is what I'm asking.
980:
Change article title to simply 'Oscars' instead of 'Academy Awards'?
876:
895:
394:
390:
704:
290:
A news item involving this article was featured on Knowledge's
2440:
I have twice had my (accessible) indication of winners via ‡ (
949:
319:
15:
1881:
Knowledge table inappropriate use guidelines for page layout
723:
703:
557:
2235:
2034:
1752:
would apply here. Leave it out till after the ceremony. --
793:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
504:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
1884:
1078:
indeed still intact. According to the official website
261:
2749:
Featured lists that have not appeared on the main page
2436:
Adding Accessibility Dispute template for bold winners
1152:
consistency, we will need to do the same for the film
160:
894:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
389:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1883:. This would better be done as a list, similar to
979:
1924:RfC: How should the performers table be formated?
1467:to see how to create this list in a proper way.
1459:For anyone who is doing this article, check out
1407:) are listed before the letter "A". Thanks.
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
678:. To improve this article, please refer to the
1063:P.S. Can we have 'Oscars 2014' redirect here?
2143:But User:Atomic Meltdown wants it like this:
174:
8:
1856:Richard Hymns broke the sound editing record
1734:No, usually not revealed till the ceremony.
2562:87th Academy Awards Featured list candicacy
785:, an attempt to structure and organize all
2422:There is a move discussion in progress on
2150:
1935:
840:
747:
674:. To use this banner, please refer to the
601:
444:
351:
225:
184:
1812:
789:. If you wish to help, please visit the
2657:
842:
749:
603:
446:
353:
1463:or any other Oscar ceremony that is a
323:
7:
2864:Pages in the Knowledge Top 25 Report
2794:Los Angeles area task force articles
1875:Adding AccessibilityDispute template
1701:and other people. (Though I do hope
888:This article is within the scope of
779:This article is within the scope of
656:This article is within the scope of
498:This article is within the scope of
383:This article is within the scope of
2824:American cinema task force articles
2789:Mid-importance Los Angeles articles
964:. The week in which this happened:
342:It is of interest to the following
216:. If you can update or improve it,
23:for discussing improvements to the
2779:Mid-importance California articles
14:
2819:FL-Class American cinema articles
2450:) reverted, and so am adding the
1241:comes before the A-letter films.
732:This article is supported by the
712:This article is supported by the
1813:Oscar's First Time Live Streamed
1624:Add a small note with the link,
1237:and click to sort Z-A then A-Z,
985:
953:
875:
865:
844:
772:
751:
672:regional and topical task forces
643:
633:
605:
569:
524:Knowledge:WikiProject California
485:
475:
448:
376:
355:
324:
283:
188:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
2814:Film awards task force articles
2799:WikiProject California articles
1322:whoever is changing the order?
1235:List of films featuring slavery
928:This article has been rated as
823:This article has been rated as
544:This article has been rated as
527:Template:WikiProject California
427:This article has been rated as
2764:Mid-importance awards articles
2754:Knowledge In the news articles
2617:10:53, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
2603:08:00, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
2574:06:39, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
2556:05:28, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
2513:21:11, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
2482:06:32, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
1907:WikiProject Accessibility talk
1:
2854:Low-importance 2010s articles
2809:FL-Class film awards articles
2784:FL-Class Los Angeles articles
2735:01:47, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
2711:00:17, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
2410:14:54, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
2396:00:05, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
2378:19:57, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
2360:19:50, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
2343:19:33, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
2250:Mandela: Long Walk to Freedom
2052:Mandela: Long Walk to Freedom
1801:10:18, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
1781:18:03, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
1761:13:03, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
1744:12:55, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
1730:07:19, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
1715:17:15, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
902:and see a list of open tasks.
582:This article is supported by
518:and see a list of open tasks.
401:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
2839:Low-importance List articles
2774:FL-Class California articles
2648:00:36, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
1919:00:07, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
1901:00:22, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
1677:20:41, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
1638:19:42, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
1604:19:30, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
1578:17:32, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
1560:17:04, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
1542:17:01, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
1526:16:50, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
1505:00:45, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
1480:00:04, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
1450:18:32, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
1417:00:48, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
1371:18:10, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
1336:16:58, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
1285:18:41, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
1255:18:34, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
1231:Collation#Alphabetical order
1207:18:13, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
1185:05:24, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
1166:04:17, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
1106:11:59, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
1092:16:18, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
1073:15:35, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
1058:15:25, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
1038:15:09, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
1007:14:52, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
407:Knowledge:WikiProject Awards
2633:Additional official posters
2418:Move discussion in progress
908:Knowledge:WikiProject 2010s
803:Knowledge:WikiProject Lists
585:Los Angeles area task force
410:Template:WikiProject Awards
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
2880:
2859:WikiProject 2010s articles
2844:WikiProject Lists articles
2720:If you look at the latest
2560:I raised the issue at the
1870:21:51, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
983:
911:Template:WikiProject 2010s
829:project's importance scale
806:Template:WikiProject Lists
735:American cinema task force
688:Knowledge:WikiProject Film
577:Greater Los Angeles portal
550:project's importance scale
202:, which means it has been
2829:WikiProject Film articles
2431:13:14, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
1851:21:36, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
1831:15:46, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
1195:Knowledge:Manual of Style
1193:Is there anything in the
927:
860:
822:
767:
731:
711:
691:Template:WikiProject Film
628:
565:
543:
470:
426:
371:
350:
310:
228:
224:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
2759:FL-Class awards articles
1692:Special tributes section
2849:FL-Class 2010s articles
1123:04:15, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
787:list pages on Knowledge
269:Featured list candidate
2834:FL-Class List articles
2804:FL-Class film articles
2697:Critical Reviews error
1836:Hersholt Award omitted
728:
715:Film awards task force
708:
562:
501:WikiProject California
332:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
2455:Accessibility dispute
2295:Wind Beneath My Wings
2103:Wind Beneath My Wings
1227:MOS:LIST#Organization
727:
707:
561:
250:Articles for deletion
100:Neutral point of view
2297:" during the annual
2105:" during the annual
1435:Multiple nominations
1405:20 Feet from Stardom
1154:20 Feet from Stardom
105:No original research
2722:92nd Academy Awards
2496:72nd Academy Awards
2424:Talk:Academy Awards
1889:87th Academy Awards
1566:65th Academy Awards
1461:72nd Academy Awards
664:join the discussion
530:California articles
214:Knowledge community
208:as one of the best
196:86th Academy Awards
25:86th Academy Awards
1139:Alphabetical order
969:March 2 to 8, 2014
729:
709:
563:
386:WikiProject Awards
338:content assessment
229:Article milestones
86:dispute resolution
47:
2330:
2329:
2182:Pharrell Williams
2141:
2140:
1975:Pharrell Williams
1750:WP:NOTCRYSTALBALL
1667:comment added by
1630:Joseph A. Spadaro
1552:Joseph A. Spadaro
1534:Joseph A. Spadaro
1518:Joseph A. Spadaro
1497:Joseph A. Spadaro
1442:Joseph A. Spadaro
1409:Joseph A. Spadaro
1363:Joseph A. Spadaro
1308:Joseph A. Spadaro
1277:Joseph A. Spadaro
1222:Joseph A. Spadaro
1199:Joseph A. Spadaro
1158:Joseph A. Spadaro
977:
976:
948:
947:
944:
943:
940:
939:
891:WikiProject 2010s
839:
838:
835:
834:
782:WikiProject Lists
746:
745:
742:
741:
666:and see lists of
600:
599:
596:
595:
493:California portal
443:
442:
439:
438:
318:
317:
278:
277:
183:
182:
66:Assume good faith
43:
2871:
2689:
2684:
2678:
2673:
2667:
2662:
2586:
2527:
2493:
2459:
2453:
2449:
2443:
2314:
2313:
2312:
2290:
2289:
2288:
2275:The Wizard of Oz
2270:Over the Rainbow
2265:
2264:
2263:
2240:
2239:
2238:
2211:
2210:
2209:
2186:
2185:
2184:
2170:
2169:
2168:
2151:
2122:
2121:
2120:
2095:
2094:
2093:
2080:The Wizard of Oz
2075:Over the Rainbow
2067:
2066:
2065:
2039:
2038:
2037:
2007:
2006:
2005:
1979:
1978:
1977:
1961:Musical arranger
1958:
1957:
1956:
1936:
1799:
1759:
1728:
1679:
1401:12 Years a Slave
1321:
1315:
1311:
1273:12 Years a Slave
1239:12 Years a Slave
1225:
1145:12 Years a Slave
1060:
1018:
989:
988:
957:
956:
950:
934:importance scale
916:
915:
912:
909:
906:
885:
880:
879:
869:
862:
861:
856:
848:
841:
811:
810:
807:
804:
801:
776:
769:
768:
763:
755:
748:
696:
695:
692:
689:
686:
659:WikiProject Film
653:
648:
647:
646:
637:
630:
629:
624:
609:
602:
579:
574:
573:
572:
532:
531:
528:
525:
522:
495:
490:
489:
488:
479:
472:
471:
466:
463:
452:
445:
433:importance scale
415:
414:
411:
408:
405:
380:
373:
372:
367:
359:
352:
335:
329:
328:
320:
311:Current status:
287:
264:
245:January 12, 2009
226:
212:produced by the
192:
185:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
2879:
2878:
2874:
2873:
2872:
2870:
2869:
2868:
2769:Awards articles
2739:
2738:
2718:
2699:
2694:
2693:
2692:
2685:
2681:
2674:
2670:
2663:
2659:
2635:
2580:
2521:
2487:
2457:
2451:
2447:
2441:
2438:
2420:
2308:
2307:
2306:
2284:
2283:
2282:
2259:
2258:
2257:
2234:
2233:
2232:
2205:
2204:
2203:
2196:Despicable Me 2
2180:
2179:
2178:
2164:
2163:
2162:
2116:
2115:
2114:
2089:
2088:
2087:
2061:
2060:
2059:
2033:
2032:
2031:
2001:
2000:
1999:
1992:Despicable Me 2
1973:
1972:
1971:
1952:
1951:
1950:
1926:
1877:
1858:
1838:
1815:
1793:
1753:
1722:
1694:
1662:
1513:
1457:
1437:
1319:
1313:
1305:
1219:
1141:
1051:
1012:
992:
991:
986:
982:
973:
954:
913:
910:
907:
904:
903:
881:
874:
854:
808:
805:
802:
799:
798:
761:
693:
690:
687:
684:
683:
649:
644:
642:
615:
575:
570:
568:
529:
526:
523:
520:
519:
491:
486:
484:
464:
458:
413:awards articles
412:
409:
406:
403:
402:
365:
336:on Knowledge's
333:
260:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
2877:
2875:
2867:
2866:
2861:
2856:
2851:
2846:
2841:
2836:
2831:
2826:
2821:
2816:
2811:
2806:
2801:
2796:
2791:
2786:
2781:
2776:
2771:
2766:
2761:
2756:
2751:
2741:
2740:
2717:
2714:
2698:
2695:
2691:
2690:
2679:
2668:
2656:
2655:
2651:
2634:
2631:
2630:
2629:
2628:
2627:
2626:
2625:
2624:
2623:
2622:
2621:
2620:
2619:
2609:Thisisnotatest
2590:
2589:
2583:Thisisnotatest
2566:Thisisnotatest
2548:Thisisnotatest
2545:
2540:
2532:
2531:
2530:
2529:
2516:
2515:
2500:
2499:
2490:Thisisnotatest
2474:Thisisnotatest
2437:
2434:
2419:
2416:
2415:
2414:
2413:
2412:
2398:
2383:
2382:
2381:
2380:
2363:
2362:
2328:
2327:
2315:
2303:
2302:
2291:
2279:
2278:
2266:
2254:
2253:
2241:
2229:
2228:
2216:
2212:
2200:
2199:
2187:
2175:
2174:
2171:
2159:
2158:
2155:
2139:
2138:
2126:
2123:
2111:
2110:
2099:
2096:
2084:
2083:
2071:
2068:
2056:
2055:
2043:
2040:
2028:
2027:
2015:
2012:
2008:
1996:
1995:
1983:
1980:
1968:
1967:
1964:
1962:
1959:
1947:
1946:
1943:
1940:
1925:
1922:
1911:Thisisnotatest
1893:Thisisnotatest
1876:
1873:
1857:
1854:
1837:
1834:
1823:205.202.38.194
1814:
1811:
1810:
1809:
1808:
1807:
1806:
1805:
1804:
1803:
1768:
1767:
1766:
1765:
1764:
1763:
1703:Shirley Temple
1693:
1690:
1689:
1688:
1687:
1686:
1685:
1684:
1683:
1682:
1681:
1680:
1669:128.122.100.21
1649:
1648:
1647:
1646:
1645:
1644:
1643:
1642:
1641:
1640:
1613:
1612:
1611:
1610:
1609:
1608:
1607:
1606:
1585:
1584:
1583:
1582:
1581:
1580:
1545:
1544:
1512:
1509:
1508:
1507:
1456:
1453:
1436:
1433:
1432:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1428:
1427:
1426:
1425:
1424:
1423:
1422:
1421:
1420:
1419:
1384:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1380:
1379:
1378:
1377:
1376:
1375:
1374:
1373:
1347:
1346:
1345:
1344:
1343:
1342:
1341:
1340:
1339:
1338:
1294:
1293:
1292:
1291:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1212:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1188:
1187:
1140:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1056:comment added
984:
981:
978:
975:
974:
972:
971:
965:
958:
946:
945:
942:
941:
938:
937:
930:Low-importance
926:
920:
919:
917:
914:2010s articles
900:the discussion
887:
886:
870:
858:
857:
855:Low‑importance
849:
837:
836:
833:
832:
825:Low-importance
821:
815:
814:
812:
777:
765:
764:
762:Low‑importance
756:
744:
743:
740:
739:
730:
720:
719:
710:
700:
699:
697:
655:
654:
638:
626:
625:
610:
598:
597:
594:
593:
590:Mid-importance
581:
580:
564:
554:
553:
546:Mid-importance
542:
536:
535:
533:
516:the discussion
497:
496:
480:
468:
467:
465:Mid‑importance
453:
441:
440:
437:
436:
429:Mid-importance
425:
419:
418:
416:
399:the discussion
381:
369:
368:
366:Mid‑importance
360:
348:
347:
341:
330:
316:
315:
308:
307:
288:
280:
279:
276:
275:
272:
265:
257:
256:
253:
246:
242:
241:
238:
235:
231:
230:
222:
221:
193:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2876:
2865:
2862:
2860:
2857:
2855:
2852:
2850:
2847:
2845:
2842:
2840:
2837:
2835:
2832:
2830:
2827:
2825:
2822:
2820:
2817:
2815:
2812:
2810:
2807:
2805:
2802:
2800:
2797:
2795:
2792:
2790:
2787:
2785:
2782:
2780:
2777:
2775:
2772:
2770:
2767:
2765:
2762:
2760:
2757:
2755:
2752:
2750:
2747:
2746:
2744:
2737:
2736:
2732:
2728:
2723:
2715:
2713:
2712:
2708:
2704:
2696:
2688:
2683:
2680:
2677:
2672:
2669:
2666:
2661:
2658:
2654:
2650:
2649:
2645:
2641:
2632:
2618:
2614:
2610:
2606:
2605:
2604:
2600:
2596:
2592:
2591:
2584:
2579:
2578:
2577:
2576:
2575:
2571:
2567:
2563:
2559:
2558:
2557:
2553:
2549:
2543:
2538:
2536:
2535:
2534:
2533:
2525:
2520:
2519:
2518:
2517:
2514:
2510:
2506:
2502:
2501:
2497:
2491:
2486:
2485:
2484:
2483:
2479:
2475:
2471:
2468:
2464:
2461:
2456:
2446:
2445:double-dagger
2435:
2433:
2432:
2429:
2425:
2417:
2411:
2407:
2403:
2399:
2397:
2393:
2389:
2385:
2384:
2379:
2375:
2371:
2367:
2366:
2365:
2364:
2361:
2357:
2353:
2349:
2348:
2347:
2346:
2345:
2344:
2340:
2336:
2326:
2325:
2320:
2316:
2311:
2305:
2304:
2300:
2296:
2292:
2287:
2281:
2280:
2277:
2276:
2271:
2267:
2262:
2256:
2255:
2252:
2251:
2246:
2245:Ordinary Love
2242:
2237:
2231:
2230:
2227:
2226:
2221:
2220:The Moon Song
2217:
2215:
2208:
2202:
2201:
2198:
2197:
2192:
2188:
2183:
2177:
2176:
2172:
2167:
2161:
2160:
2156:
2153:
2152:
2149:
2148:
2144:
2137:
2136:
2131:
2127:
2124:
2119:
2113:
2112:
2108:
2104:
2100:
2097:
2092:
2086:
2085:
2082:
2081:
2076:
2072:
2069:
2064:
2058:
2057:
2054:
2053:
2048:
2047:Ordinary Love
2044:
2041:
2036:
2030:
2029:
2026:
2025:
2020:
2019:The Moon Song
2016:
2013:
2011:
2004:
1998:
1997:
1994:
1993:
1988:
1984:
1981:
1976:
1970:
1969:
1965:
1960:
1955:
1949:
1948:
1944:
1941:
1938:
1937:
1934:
1933:
1929:
1923:
1921:
1920:
1916:
1912:
1908:
1903:
1902:
1898:
1894:
1890:
1886:
1882:
1874:
1872:
1871:
1867:
1863:
1855:
1853:
1852:
1848:
1844:
1843:68.146.70.124
1835:
1833:
1832:
1828:
1824:
1819:
1802:
1798:
1797:
1791:
1790:
1789:
1788:
1787:
1786:
1785:
1784:
1783:
1782:
1778:
1774:
1762:
1758:
1757:
1751:
1748:Then I think
1747:
1746:
1745:
1741:
1737:
1733:
1732:
1731:
1727:
1726:
1719:
1718:
1717:
1716:
1712:
1708:
1704:
1700:
1699:Andy Griffith
1691:
1678:
1674:
1670:
1666:
1659:
1658:
1657:
1656:
1655:
1654:
1653:
1652:
1651:
1650:
1639:
1635:
1631:
1627:
1623:
1622:
1621:
1620:
1619:
1618:
1617:
1616:
1615:
1614:
1605:
1601:
1597:
1593:
1592:
1591:
1590:
1589:
1588:
1587:
1586:
1579:
1575:
1571:
1567:
1563:
1562:
1561:
1557:
1553:
1549:
1548:
1547:
1546:
1543:
1539:
1535:
1530:
1529:
1528:
1527:
1523:
1519:
1510:
1506:
1502:
1498:
1493:
1488:
1484:
1483:
1482:
1481:
1477:
1473:
1468:
1466:
1465:featured list
1462:
1455:Proper format
1454:
1452:
1451:
1447:
1443:
1434:
1418:
1414:
1410:
1406:
1402:
1398:
1397:
1396:
1395:
1394:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1390:
1389:
1388:
1387:
1386:
1385:
1372:
1368:
1364:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1355:
1354:
1353:
1352:
1351:
1350:
1349:
1348:
1337:
1333:
1329:
1325:
1318:
1309:
1304:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1300:
1299:
1298:
1297:
1296:
1295:
1286:
1282:
1278:
1274:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1256:
1252:
1248:
1244:
1240:
1236:
1232:
1228:
1223:
1218:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1213:
1208:
1204:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1189:
1186:
1182:
1178:
1174:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1167:
1163:
1159:
1155:
1150:
1147:alphabetized
1146:
1138:
1124:
1120:
1116:
1112:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1103:
1099:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1089:
1085:
1081:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1062:
1061:
1059:
1055:
1049:
1045:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1016:
1011:
1010:
1009:
1008:
1004:
1000:
996:
970:
967:
966:
963:
962:Top 25 Report
959:
952:
951:
935:
931:
925:
922:
921:
918:
901:
897:
893:
892:
884:
878:
873:
871:
868:
864:
863:
859:
853:
850:
847:
843:
830:
826:
820:
817:
816:
813:
809:List articles
796:
792:
788:
784:
783:
778:
775:
771:
770:
766:
760:
757:
754:
750:
737:
736:
726:
722:
721:
717:
716:
706:
702:
701:
698:
694:film articles
681:
677:
676:documentation
673:
669:
665:
661:
660:
652:
641:
639:
636:
632:
631:
627:
623:
619:
614:
611:
608:
604:
591:
588:(assessed as
587:
586:
578:
567:
560:
556:
555:
551:
547:
541:
538:
537:
534:
517:
513:
512:
507:
503:
502:
494:
483:
481:
478:
474:
473:
469:
462:
457:
454:
451:
447:
434:
430:
424:
421:
420:
417:
400:
396:
392:
388:
387:
382:
379:
375:
374:
370:
364:
361:
358:
354:
349:
345:
339:
331:
327:
322:
321:
314:
313:Featured list
309:
305:
304:March 3, 2014
301:
299:
293:
289:
286:
282:
281:
273:
271:
270:
266:
263:
262:July 23, 2014
259:
258:
254:
252:
251:
247:
244:
243:
239:
236:
233:
232:
227:
223:
219:
215:
211:
207:
206:
201:
200:featured list
197:
194:
191:
187:
186:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
2719:
2700:
2682:
2671:
2660:
2652:
2636:
2595:Birdienest81
2524:Birdienest81
2505:Birdienest81
2472:
2469:
2465:
2462:
2439:
2421:
2370:Birdienest81
2335:Birdienest81
2331:
2322:
2310:Idina Menzel
2298:
2286:Bette Midler
2273:
2248:
2223:
2194:
2166:William Ross
2146:
2145:
2142:
2133:
2118:Idina Menzel
2106:
2091:Bette Midler
2078:
2050:
2022:
1990:
1954:William Ross
1931:
1930:
1927:
1904:
1878:
1859:
1839:
1820:
1816:
1795:
1769:
1755:
1724:
1695:
1663:— Preceding
1625:
1514:
1491:
1486:
1472:Birdienest81
1469:
1458:
1438:
1404:
1400:
1272:
1238:
1153:
1148:
1144:
1142:
1115:Kailash29792
1111:Oppose move:
1110:
1084:Birdienest81
993:
929:
889:
883:2010s portal
824:
791:project page
780:
733:
713:
657:
583:
545:
509:
499:
428:
384:
344:WikiProjects
312:
295:
267:
248:
218:please do so
203:
195:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
2716:In Memorial
2640:67.53.124.5
2388:Crisco 1492
2299:In Memoriam
2214:Ezra Koenig
2173:Orchestral
2107:In Memoriam
2010:Ezra Koenig
1966:Orchestral
1052:—Preceding
995:I read this
651:Film portal
461:Los Angeles
298:In the news
148:free images
31:not a forum
2743:Categories
2653:References
2460:template.
2042:Performers
2014:Performers
1945:Performed
1796:Connelly90
1756:Connelly90
1736:Spanneraol
1725:Connelly90
1628:exactly?
1596:Trivialist
1570:Spanneraol
1516:Thanks.
1495:Thanks.
1492:guidelines
1229:points to
1098:Crazy Eddy
1065:Crazy Eddy
1044:Crazy Eddy
1015:Crazy Eddy
999:Crazy Eddy
795:discussion
680:guidelines
668:open tasks
521:California
511:California
506:U.S. state
456:California
302:column on
205:identified
2727:Eschoryii
2319:Let It Go
2154:Artist(s)
2130:Let It Go
2125:Performer
2098:Performer
2070:Performer
1982:Performer
1963:Conductor
1511:Best Song
292:Main Page
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
2428:RMCD bot
2402:Cowlibob
2352:SchroCat
2301:tribute
2157:Song(s)
2147:OPTION 2
2109:tribute
1939:Name(s)
1932:OPTION 1
1665:unsigned
1312:Can you
990:Resolved
622:American
334:FL-class
274:Promoted
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
2321:" from
2272:" from
2247:" from
2222:" from
2207:Karen O
2193:" from
2132:" from
2077:" from
2049:" from
2021:" from
2003:Karen O
1989:" from
1887:to the
1885:my edit
1332:contrib
1251:contrib
1181:contrib
1054:undated
1034:contrib
1022:WT:FILM
932:on the
827:on the
548:on the
431:on the
294:in the
255:Deleted
237:Process
154:WPÂ refs
142:scholar
2703:Poydoo
2333:lists.
2324:Frozen
2135:Frozen
1891:page.
618:Awards
404:Awards
395:prizes
391:awards
363:Awards
340:scale.
240:Result
126:Google
2539:could
2191:Happy
1987:Happy
1942:Role
1862:Wgolf
1773:Wgolf
1707:Wgolf
1626:where
1149:first
905:2010s
896:2010s
852:2010s
800:Lists
759:Lists
210:lists
198:is a
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
2731:talk
2707:talk
2644:talk
2613:talk
2599:talk
2570:talk
2552:talk
2509:talk
2478:talk
2406:talk
2392:talk
2374:talk
2356:talk
2339:talk
2261:Pink
2063:Pink
1915:talk
1897:talk
1866:talk
1847:talk
1827:talk
1777:talk
1740:talk
1711:talk
1673:talk
1634:talk
1600:talk
1574:talk
1556:talk
1538:talk
1522:talk
1501:talk
1487:this
1476:talk
1446:talk
1413:talk
1403:and
1367:talk
1328:talk
1324:Erik
1317:ping
1281:talk
1247:talk
1243:Erik
1203:talk
1177:talk
1173:Erik
1162:talk
1119:talk
1102:talk
1088:talk
1080:here
1069:talk
1048:talk
1030:talk
1026:Erik
1003:talk
685:Film
670:and
613:Film
393:and
234:Date
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
2225:Her
2024:Her
1334:)
1253:)
1183:)
1050:)
1036:)
924:Low
819:Low
540:Mid
508:of
423:Mid
176:TWL
2745::
2733:)
2709:)
2646:)
2615:)
2601:)
2593:--
2572:)
2564:.
2554:)
2544:is
2537:I
2511:)
2503:--
2480:)
2458:}}
2452:{{
2448:}}
2442:{{
2408:)
2394:)
2376:)
2358:)
2341:)
2236:U2
2035:U2
1917:)
1909:.
1899:)
1868:)
1849:)
1829:)
1821:--
1779:)
1742:)
1721:--
1713:)
1675:)
1636:)
1602:)
1576:)
1558:)
1540:)
1524:)
1503:)
1478:)
1448:)
1415:)
1369:)
1330:|
1320:}}
1314:{{
1283:)
1249:|
1205:)
1179:|
1164:)
1121:)
1104:)
1090:)
1071:)
1032:|
1024:.
1005:)
620:/
616::
592:).
459::
156:)
54:;
2729:(
2705:(
2642:(
2611:(
2597:(
2585::
2581:@
2568:(
2550:(
2526::
2522:@
2507:(
2492::
2488:@
2476:(
2404:(
2390:(
2372:(
2354:(
2337:(
2317:"
2293:"
2268:"
2243:"
2218:"
2189:"
2128:"
2101:"
2073:"
2045:"
2017:"
1985:"
1913:(
1895:(
1864:(
1845:(
1825:(
1775:(
1738:(
1709:(
1671:(
1632:(
1598:(
1572:(
1554:(
1536:(
1520:(
1499:(
1474:(
1444:(
1411:(
1365:(
1326:(
1310::
1306:@
1279:(
1245:(
1224::
1220:@
1201:(
1175:(
1160:(
1117:(
1100:(
1086:(
1067:(
1046:(
1028:(
1017::
1013:@
1001:(
936:.
831:.
797:.
738:.
718:.
682:.
552:.
435:.
346::
306:.
300:"
296:"
220:.
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
