725:
698:
828:
624:
396:
735:
881:
840:
287:
475:
614:
21:
593:
181:
277:
256:
225:
386:
365:
1030:"Fox News has been described by academics, media figures, political figures, and watchdog groups as being biased in favor of the Republican Party in its news coverage, as perpetuating conservative bias, and as misleading their audience in relation to science, notably climate change.".
1090:
mentions from the beginning about Fox News displaying bias. I wanted to do the same for CNN, it is an indisputable fact that CNN has and probably always will be left-wing. That being said, how come for CNN, Knowledge (XXG) does
34:
procedure applies to this article. This article is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this
563:
853:
708:
1200:
122:
Edits made which remove or otherwise change any material placed by clearly established consensus, without first obtaining consensus to do so, may be treated in the same manner as obvious vandalism.
1332:
765:
782:
1342:
858:
818:
1347:
1196:
1065:
1327:
1202:
808:
772:
680:
347:
1337:
1181:
89:
1352:
1312:
1282:
670:
337:
201:. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them.
777:
1272:
452:
188:
1317:
1287:
1180:
Are there no liberal, I mean "reliable" sources that show CNN paid him an undisclosed amount for defamation? Is defaming someone not controversial?
646:
309:
1322:
313:
1297:
442:
748:
703:
1307:
1277:
1302:
637:
598:
418:
300:
261:
760:
521:
204:
192:
1185:
1095:
state it is a left-wing source as the opening but have no problem doing so for Fox News by saying they're a conservative network?
902:
898:
894:
756:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
1292:
487:
236:
144:
100:
96:
64:
31:
527:
409:
370:
1013:, Knowledge (XXG) somehow reverts my edit that seeks to appeal to both liberals and conservatives. However, it was removed
1138:
1114:
1100:
1047:
156:
60:
1150:
928:
1198:
534:
210:
1141:. During his participation in the panel "Liberdade de OpiniĂŁo", where he defended ineffective medicines against
1109:
Because a consensus of reliable sources does not so describe it. Knowledge (XXG) is based upon reliable sources.
911:
148:
129:
116:
52:
1110:
1096:
1043:
242:
1146:
1073:
125:
In order to be considered "clearly established" the consensus must be proven by prior talk-page discussion.
1087:
1025:
152:
63:
may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the
56:
645:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
548:
417:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
414:
740:
1018:
1017:. How come Knowledge (XXG) considered CNN, MSNBC, CBS, PBS, etc. as reliable news but not Fox News (
500:
224:
198:
1235:
1165:
974:
493:
42:
1249:
1069:
917:
510:
724:
697:
1213:
1010:
845:
629:
544:
401:
292:
136:
1083:
99:
of this topic being designated a contentious topic and who violate these restrictions may be
1221:
913:
880:
147:
procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the
128:
Reverts of edits made by anonymous (IP) editors are exempt from the 1RR but are subject to
1068:. Even if it is, the source doesn't really discuss CNN's reputation as far as I can tell.
506:
305:
959:
show OP had no intent on collegial debate, and they've been blocked. Non-admin closure.
827:
162:
If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first.
1231:
1209:
1161:
1035:
962:
474:
1266:
1245:
1137:
I would like to quote here a remarkable case of controversy involving the journalist
1060:
753:
159:. Contentious topics sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
839:
286:
135:
Whenever you are relying on one of these exemptions, you should refer to it in your
1039:
139:
and, if applicable, link to the discussion where consensus was clearly established.
115:
Edits made solely to enforce any clearly established consensus are exempt from all
20:
1034:
How come my edit was taken down, but the above statement wasn't? WP is "neutral"?
1217:
1038:
is correct, WP lost it's credibility as a reliable source a long time ago, even
308:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can
304:, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Knowledge (XXG) articles about
41:
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on this article (except in
1002:
835:
730:
642:
619:
613:
592:
540:
514:
391:
282:
915:
1253:
1239:
1225:
1189:
1169:
1154:
1118:
1104:
1077:
1051:
983:
752:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
213:
when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
1142:
276:
255:
1212:. I think a section on settlements would be fine; the sister article
926:
This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by
132:. If you are in doubt, contact an administrator for assistance.
1195:
There are actually reliable sources that cover the settlement:
1058:
I think you may run into a problem convincing people that the
918:
874:
385:
364:
218:
175:
15:
1145:. Can I add it here or do I need to put it on another page?
826:
1009:
point of view for both dems and reps. Let's take a look at
84:
Violations of any of these restrictions should be reported
51:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the
1014:
956:
952:
948:
641:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
413:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1208:also mentions a previous settlement CNN made with
1333:B-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
312:. To improve this article, please refer to the
8:
1343:Mid-importance American television articles
103:by any uninvolved administrator, even on a
1001:I am deeply disappointed in how Wikibias (
990:The following discussion has been closed.
944:
692:
587:
482:Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
460:
359:
250:
69:
793:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject United States
1005:) undid my edit. I tried to establish a
111:With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:
1348:American television task force articles
1003:described Tucker Carlson just yesterday
694:
589:
361:
252:
222:
655:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Journalism
322:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Television
164:Remember: When in doubt, don't revert!
1328:Mid-importance United States articles
7:
1338:B-Class American television articles
1273:Knowledge (XXG) controversial topics
746:This article is within the scope of
635:This article is within the scope of
407:This article is within the scope of
298:This article is within the scope of
27:Warning: active arbitration remedies
241:It is of interest to the following
1353:WikiProject United States articles
1313:Mid-importance Journalism articles
1283:Mid-importance television articles
796:Template:WikiProject United States
14:
427:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Media
1230:I support an addition on this.
1028:where THIS is found upon entry:
879:
838:
733:
723:
696:
622:
612:
591:
473:
394:
384:
363:
285:
275:
254:
223:
179:
19:
1318:WikiProject Journalism articles
1288:WikiProject Television articles
813:This article has been rated as
675:This article has been rated as
658:Template:WikiProject Journalism
447:This article has been rated as
342:This article has been rated as
325:Template:WikiProject Television
203:Content must be written from a
187:The subject of this article is
130:the usual rules on edit warring
1323:B-Class United States articles
1244:I've added it to the article.
941:How come my edit was reverted?
854:American television task force
528:Content (media and publishing)
1:
1298:Mid-importance Media articles
1226:09:10, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
1190:07:23, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
1160:What is the source for this?
1139:Alexandre Garcia (journalist)
1133:Disputes involving CNN Brazil
851:This article is supported by
649:and see a list of open tasks.
464:WikiProject Media To-do List:
421:and see a list of open tasks.
65:contentious topics procedures
1240:00:12, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
1170:14:52, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
1155:00:23, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
1308:B-Class Journalism articles
1278:B-Class television articles
1086:. I am disappointed in how
984:22:12, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
197:When updating the article,
1369:
1303:WikiProject Media articles
819:project's importance scale
681:project's importance scale
453:project's importance scale
430:Template:WikiProject Media
348:project's importance scale
149:purpose of Knowledge (XXG)
53:purpose of Knowledge (XXG)
1254:01:58, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
1119:02:59, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
1105:00:16, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
1078:05:10, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
1052:04:38, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
834:
812:
749:WikiProject United States
718:
674:
607:
459:
446:
379:
341:
270:
249:
199:be bold, but not reckless
67:before editing this page.
1216:mentions similar issues.
993:Please do not modify it.
754:United States of America
157:normal editorial process
81:Enforcement procedures:
61:normal editorial process
1182:2600:387:A:982:0:0:0:64
90:arbitration enforcement
1293:B-Class Media articles
1088:Fox News controversies
1026:Fox News controversies
929:Lowercase sigmabot III
831:
799:United States articles
638:WikiProject Journalism
301:WikiProject Television
231:This article is rated
191:and content may be in
153:standards of behaviour
57:standards of behaviour
1082:You should check out
830:
564:requests for comments
549:Alternative newspaper
316:for the type of work.
235:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
205:neutral point of view
43:limited circumstances
1054:RepublicanJones1952
741:United States portal
1111:NorthBySouthBaranof
1097:RepublicanJones1952
1044:RepublicanJones1952
1024:Now take a look at
953:with this invective
767:Articles Requested!
661:Journalism articles
328:television articles
310:join the discussion
306:television programs
74:Further information
832:
511:Video game culture
237:content assessment
145:contentious topics
32:contentious topics
28:
1214:BBC controversies
1204:The article from
1130:
1129:
1066:a reliable source
1011:CNN controversies
981:
936:
935:
873:
872:
869:
868:
865:
864:
846:Television portal
691:
690:
687:
686:
630:Journalism portal
586:
585:
582:
581:
578:
577:
574:
573:
545:Alternative media
410:WikiProject Media
402:Journalism portal
358:
357:
354:
353:
293:Television portal
217:
216:
174:
173:
170:
169:
26:
1360:
995:
982:
977:
971:
970:
965:
957:this final straw
945:
931:
919:
883:
875:
848:
843:
842:
801:
800:
797:
794:
791:
743:
738:
737:
736:
727:
720:
719:
714:
711:
700:
693:
663:
662:
659:
656:
653:
632:
627:
626:
625:
616:
609:
608:
603:
595:
588:
488:Article requests
477:
470:
469:
461:
435:
434:
431:
428:
425:
404:
399:
398:
397:
388:
381:
380:
375:
367:
360:
330:
329:
326:
323:
320:
314:style guidelines
295:
290:
289:
279:
272:
271:
266:
258:
251:
234:
228:
227:
219:
183:
182:
176:
95:Editors who are
70:
23:
16:
1368:
1367:
1363:
1362:
1361:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1263:
1262:
1206:Washington Post
1178:
1147:André L P Souza
1135:
1042:says the same.
991:
975:
968:
963:
960:
943:
927:
920:
914:
888:
844:
837:
798:
795:
792:
789:
788:
787:
773:Become a Member
739:
734:
732:
712:
706:
660:
657:
654:
651:
650:
628:
623:
621:
601:
570:
507:Media influence
432:
429:
426:
423:
422:
400:
395:
393:
373:
327:
324:
321:
318:
317:
291:
284:
264:
232:
180:
166:
151:, any expected
75:
55:, any expected
48:
12:
11:
5:
1366:
1364:
1356:
1355:
1350:
1345:
1340:
1335:
1330:
1325:
1320:
1315:
1310:
1305:
1300:
1295:
1290:
1285:
1280:
1275:
1265:
1264:
1261:
1260:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1210:Richard Jewell
1177:
1174:
1173:
1172:
1134:
1131:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1036:Tucker Carlson
997:
996:
987:
986:
942:
939:
934:
933:
925:
922:
921:
916:
912:
910:
907:
906:
890:
889:
884:
878:
871:
870:
867:
866:
863:
862:
859:Mid-importance
850:
849:
833:
823:
822:
815:Mid-importance
811:
805:
804:
802:
786:
785:
780:
775:
770:
763:
761:Template Usage
757:
745:
744:
728:
716:
715:
713:Mid‑importance
701:
689:
688:
685:
684:
677:Mid-importance
673:
667:
666:
664:
647:the discussion
634:
633:
617:
605:
604:
602:Mid‑importance
596:
584:
583:
580:
579:
576:
575:
572:
571:
569:
568:
567:
566:
559:
551:
530:
517:
496:
481:
479:
478:
466:
465:
457:
456:
449:Mid-importance
445:
439:
438:
436:
433:Media articles
419:the discussion
406:
405:
389:
377:
376:
374:Mid‑importance
368:
356:
355:
352:
351:
344:Mid-importance
340:
334:
333:
331:
297:
296:
280:
268:
267:
265:Mid‑importance
259:
247:
246:
240:
229:
215:
214:
184:
172:
171:
168:
167:
160:
141:
140:
133:
126:
123:
120:
109:
108:
93:
80:
77:
76:
73:
47:
46:
38:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1365:
1354:
1351:
1349:
1346:
1344:
1341:
1339:
1336:
1334:
1331:
1329:
1326:
1324:
1321:
1319:
1316:
1314:
1311:
1309:
1306:
1304:
1301:
1299:
1296:
1294:
1291:
1289:
1286:
1284:
1281:
1279:
1276:
1274:
1271:
1270:
1268:
1255:
1251:
1247:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1223:
1219:
1215:
1211:
1207:
1203:
1201:
1199:
1197:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1187:
1183:
1176:Nick Sandmann
1175:
1171:
1167:
1163:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1156:
1152:
1148:
1144:
1140:
1132:
1120:
1116:
1112:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1102:
1098:
1094:
1089:
1085:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1075:
1071:
1070:Larry Hockett
1067:
1063:
1062:
1061:New York Post
1057:
1056:
1055:
1053:
1049:
1045:
1041:
1037:
1032:
1031:
1027:
1022:
1020:
1016:
1012:
1008:
1004:
999:
998:
994:
989:
988:
985:
980:
978:
967:
966:
958:
954:
950:
947:
946:
940:
938:
930:
924:
923:
909:
908:
905:
904:
900:
896:
892:
891:
887:
882:
877:
876:
860:
857:(assessed as
856:
855:
847:
841:
836:
829:
825:
824:
820:
816:
810:
807:
806:
803:
790:United States
784:
781:
779:
776:
774:
771:
769:
768:
764:
762:
759:
758:
755:
751:
750:
742:
731:
729:
726:
722:
721:
717:
710:
705:
704:United States
702:
699:
695:
682:
678:
672:
669:
668:
665:
648:
644:
640:
639:
631:
620:
618:
615:
611:
610:
606:
600:
597:
594:
590:
565:
561:
560:
558:
556:
552:
550:
546:
542:
539:
537:
536:
531:
529:
526:
524:
523:
518:
516:
512:
508:
505:
503:
502:
497:
495:
492:
490:
489:
484:
483:
480:
476:
472:
471:
468:
467:
463:
462:
458:
454:
450:
444:
441:
440:
437:
420:
416:
412:
411:
403:
392:
390:
387:
383:
382:
378:
372:
369:
366:
362:
349:
345:
339:
336:
335:
332:
315:
311:
307:
303:
302:
294:
288:
283:
281:
278:
274:
273:
269:
263:
260:
257:
253:
248:
244:
238:
230:
226:
221:
220:
212:
208:
206:
200:
196:
194:
190:
189:controversial
185:
178:
177:
165:
161:
158:
154:
150:
146:
138:
134:
131:
127:
124:
121:
119:restrictions.
118:
114:
113:
112:
106:
105:first offense
102:
98:
94:
91:
87:
83:
82:
79:
78:
72:
71:
68:
66:
62:
58:
54:
49:
44:
40:
39:
36:
33:
25:
22:
18:
17:
1205:
1179:
1136:
1092:
1059:
1040:Larry Sanger
1033:
1029:
1023:
1006:
1000:
992:
972:
961:
949:This comment
937:
893:
885:
852:
814:
778:Project Talk
766:
747:
676:
636:
554:
553:
533:
532:
520:
519:
499:
498:
494:Mackay Radio
486:
485:
448:
408:
343:
299:
243:WikiProjects
202:
186:
163:
142:
137:edit summary
117:edit-warring
110:
104:
92:noticeboard.
85:
50:
37:
29:
86:immediately
1267:Categories
1019:WP:FOXNEWS
709:Television
652:Journalism
643:journalism
599:Journalism
541:Multimedia
515:Sound bite
319:Television
262:Television
101:sanctioned
1232:SmolBrane
1162:ValarianB
211:citations
155:, or any
59:, or any
1246:X-Editor
1143:COVID-19
951:, along
886:Archives
209:Include
35:article:
1084:WP:NPOV
1064:is now
976:chatter
817:on the
679:on the
562:Answer
501:Cleanup
451:on the
346:on the
233:B-class
193:dispute
88:to the
1218:LM2000
783:Alerts
535:Verify
239:scale.
555:Other
424:Media
415:Media
371:Media
97:aware
1250:talk
1236:talk
1222:talk
1186:talk
1166:talk
1151:talk
1115:talk
1101:talk
1074:Talk
1048:talk
1021:)?
1015:here
1007:fair
964:Nate
955:and
522:NPOV
143:The
30:The
1093:not
809:Mid
671:Mid
443:Mid
338:Mid
1269::
1252:)
1238:)
1224:)
1188:)
1168:)
1153:)
1117:)
1103:)
1076:)
1050:)
901:,
897:,
861:).
707::
547:,
543:,
513:,
509:,
1248:(
1234:(
1220:(
1184:(
1164:(
1149:(
1113:(
1099:(
1072:(
1046:(
979:)
973:(
969:•
932:.
903:3
899:2
895:1
821:.
683:.
557::
538::
525::
504::
491::
455:.
350:.
245::
207:.
195:.
107:.
45:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
