Talk:Coldplay/Archive 1 - Knowledge (XXG)

562:

thousand other Coldplay sites in particular. Remember how back in the day e-mail was originally used to promote stuff? Then it just got out of hand and became denoted as spam? Well potentially if we just let promoters just add their sites here as they please, wikipedia is going to be an excessive source of "linkspam". So we're trying to nip it in the bud in preventing a overflow of these sites by trying to prevent an existence of them to begin with, just adding sites in the manner above. 2) Repeatedly adding your site after it has been taken off four times just makes you look like a spammer rather than someone who is trying to offer some unique sources for Coldplay fans to visit. If you really want to add your site here, instead of just adding your link, make a case for it here, and then maybe someone else may put on.

409:"biggest single to date" is very ambiguous b/c it is both misleading and unverifiable. You can evaluate that claim with so many different criteria: critical response, number of awards earned, airplay, hits on Google, use in movies or television, fan polls, crowd response at concerts, and good old sales position or figures. By what criteria is that claim being made? When the result isn't universally acknowleged, we really shouldn't make comments indicating what our personal biases perceive to be the "biggest single" or what not. -- 993:, that they put online, and which really put the wind up New Labour's spin machine, to the extent that a briefing alerting government ministers to the story was circulated. Thus its not 'an indiscriminate item of information', but places Coldplay within a cultural context, complete with external reference links to the song and newspaper articles in question. Currently however I note that all mention of the hoax has been erradicated apart from in the external links section. 356:, have stated. I believe Japan has the 2nd largest market, although maybe not for these types of recordings. In any case, would a seperate article containing chart info from the main countries, like USA, UK, Japan, Canada, Sweden, Portugal, New Zealand, be of interest to you (or anyone) while also leaving the US and UK on the main article? On the other hand, I should add that leaving the Canadian and Australian positions on the main article for Coldplay does 31: 385:, but it is also not verifiable as a fact. Looking at sales positions, you can easily argue that Yellow was more if not as popular as Clocks at that point of the band's history. The Scientist charted moderately, but it was easily the crowd favorite during the A Rush of Blood To The Head tour. Simply stating the popular singles from AROBTTH is sufficent enough, there's no point in making a questionable and opinionated claim. -- 806:, but merely sampled them". Its clear to me that 'Speak' hasn't sampled 'Computer Love', its pinched the synthesiser hook and played it on a guitar (I always wondered why against my better instincts I actually liked 'Speak', it wasn't til it was pointed out to me that it uses the riff from Computer Love, which I've always liked, that i realised why). Also i'm sure I saw Chris martin on telly on the 396:

biggest (and no it was not me who originally made that claim). Mine still uses facts based on its positions and length (weeks on) on several of the biggest charts in the U.S. (some not shown) and the fact that they picked up the most prestigious honor - Record Of The Year - at the 2003 Grammies. Also, don't forget that the single "Yellow", unlike "Clocks" was released as an EP

301:. And in case you did not know, these four countries are the most major of the musical markets (with Japan in fifth). Remember, this is an encyclopedia. If someone was looking for these positions but they weren't displayed because of "cluttered-ness", then they'd find that ridiculous. I know I most certainly would. -- 420:

Quantifiable, yet prestigious factors (charts, no. of movies involved, awards, Google/ Yahoo! hits) more than qualitative (fan reaction or, ummm, personal opinion). <<When the result isn't universally acknowleged, we really shouldn't make comments indicating what our personal biases perceive to

342:

article only contains the ingredients, not the actual instructions on how to make a salad. An encylopedia like Knowledge (XXG) simply needs to contain the most important points on a subject - specific details can be directed through the external links. For example, the Caesar salad article contains

254:

Please refrain from making ANY edits to the discography right now. We need to come to a consensus on what should and shouldn't be included in this section, regarding charting numbers, countries to include, record labels, etc. There's simply too much clutter in the article and it makes the section a

561:

1) I understand your intention to get your site "out there", but some people are under the illusion that Knowledge (XXG) is the ultimate source for site promotion. While a site could be posted here if it adds enough to the article, there are so many "fancruft" sites on the internet, and potentially

186:

Champion was born in Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom where his father, Timothy Champion, is professor of archaeology at the University of Southampton. As a youth, his musical influences included Tom Waits and traditional Irish folk music. He grew up playing guitar, but also had experience on

582:

I'm putting this message near the bottom because it is not extremely important. However, has anyone heard Coldplay's "Til Kingdom Come" and The Arcade Fires' "Neighborhood #4 (7 Kettles)"? These two songs seem awkwardly similar in style and maybe if someone else has noticed, we should mention it??

395:

Somehow I knew this would be reverted... In light of what you said I guess it makes no difference really if the "claim" is put on or off. I suppose if you look at all charts, fan reaction, and how successful it did in other countries than the U.S. anyone can make a debate as to which song was the

703:

under "well-known performers" indicating that the drummer from Coldplay also plays tin whistle. While this is true and he's certainly well-known, I can't find any listing indicating that Coldplay (or anyone else, for that matter) has actually recorded him playing the instrument, so I reverted the

423:

This is correct. Be careful, though, how you define "universally acknowleged". When a song makes a big enough dent successwise in some parts of the "universe" that should be considered "successful" throughout the "universe" generally even if other parts if it aren't acknowledged. Now THAT's a

640:

Being British as well as literate, I would propose that the use of is/are is dependent upon the structure of the sentence--whether or not the group is being referred to as a single unit, or collectively. For example, it is grammatically correct to say 'Coldplay is the greatest band ever, in my

897:

Apparently its not 'significant', however, this made page three of one of biggest newspapers in the UK as well as a by-line on the front page, hence I feel it is appropriate for inclusion. However I was accused by Madchester of being a 'vandal' when I questioned his edits. I would appreciate a

610:

although im a big fan of coldplay, a lot of their songs are very similar...comparing X&Y to rush of blood, its in a very similar format. Square One vs. In my Place, Fix you vs. Amsterdam, daylight vs. twisted logic, warning sign vs. see you soon and most importantly.... CLOCKS VS. SPEED OF

998:

As there is obviously a dispute here as to whether this item should be included, it should be thrown open for consensus to decide, not for you to simply revert my contributions in such a high handed manner. I suggest this matter be thrown open to consesus and the results be respected by both

786:

I think the two "see also" sections make the page look ugly, because why not just have "influences listed in order" and "similar artists" to become titles instead? Well, I will change it to show everyone what I mean, because I really think it will be a lot better, and show a good example for

1004:

More seriously though, you have placed a 'vandalism' notice on my talk page which is totally out of order. You have not addressed this matter, and I expect you to do so by publically retracting your comments regarding my being a 'vandal' and inserting 'nonsense' into articles.

641:

opinion'; conversely, it would be more correct to state that 'Coldplay are in the studio once again'. This is/are confusion is common, and grates with pedants on both sides of the pond. Others choose to just get on with reading the damned sentence and cope. :-)

267:

While I hate to make changes unilaterally, I moved all the CAN adn AUS charting positions to their respective singles infoboxes. There was simply too much information being presented in the discography, and it was making it completely unpresentable/unreadable.

810:

show or suchlike acknowledging that he 'borrowed' the riff from Computer Love, and that he had Kraftwerk's permission to do so. So to me that counts as 'influenced by' (you can't get much more 'influenced' than pinching someone elses tune note for note...)

937:

Just because a story has been published in "one of the biggest newspapers in the UK" doesn't justify its inclusion in Knowledge (XXG). There are regular front page newspaper articles on lottery winners, but these persons are generally non-notable, per

619:

Being British, Coldplay 'is' grates with me. I know on Knowledge (XXG) we are not pedantic about the different versions of English, but it would seem more natural that the British English 'Coldplay are' was used as they are all British.

343:

external links on several recipes. Likewise, the Coldplay article doesn't need to include every detail; specifics like non US, UK album positions can be externally linked to a known resource like Billboard or the band's official site. --

611:

SOUND!!!! its exactly the same chord progression but in a different key. i mean, come on, its not like they're the foo fighters (who can get away with it cause they're not nearly as popular). at least they're on different albums...

216:

How should we lay out the discography for chart figures? Do we actually need the placings for AUS and CAN, cuz they add to much clutter the essential information in the discography. Look at the discography for bands like

841:

page as the "Talk to David" song was allegedly the product of the whole band, not just CM. The whole hoax thing should at least be acknowledged in the main Coldpaly article, even if the detail belongs on the CM page, IMHO

683:

That's irrelevant, seeing as 'Coldplay' is the object there, not the subject. "Coldplay are my favourite band" would certainly be acceptable and, seeing as I'm a Brit, preferable to "Coldplay is my favourite band" for me.

424:

fact. ;) I still believe that "Clocks" did have the biggest "dent" out of all of Coldplay's hits, but my survival in this universe does not depend on putting this fact on the article, so...again...leave it off.

801:

I have to start by saying that I find Coldplay unutterably dull (hence don't have much of a stake in this article), but have to respond to another editor's comment that Coldplay were "In no way influenced by

119:"The band allows their music to be used in film, television, and promotional spots such as the movie trailer to Peter Pan. However, Coldplay has been adamant against their use in actual product endorsement." 326:

who have discographies that are clean, clear, and to the point. Both these bands have a large international audience, but there's no need to list specific album positions for each country outside the Big

601:

Come on, they're both folk songs... that's the only similarity. With this policy we should mention things like that for all folk songs, blues songs, rock'n'roll songs, classical pieces and so on. --

474: 989:

about Thom Yorke or whoever, the joke being of course Chris Martins leanings towards leftist liberal political causes such as Make Trade Fair etc. The hoaxers went so far as to whip up a fake song

552:

Once again, Knowledge (XXG)'s not a repository for external links, and it's not free webspace to advertise personal websites, especially one's that have only been online for less than a week. --

1018:

I don't have any strong opinions on whether the hoax is all that notable (and, in fact, I've heard very little of Coldplay's music), but I do have to agree that the controversial edits weren't

141:

You could just replace the current image, with the one with the boys on the cover of Inside Entertainment at the bottom of the page... or any other pic that Knowledge (XXG) allows I guess. --

485:

I've heard of the term "Britrock", but it's a very generic term that has never been well defined like the two phases of the Britpop movement. And it's never really entered the mainstream.

479: 284: 933:

B) Chris Martin's involvement is in name only. The author could have chosen any other artist (Thom Yorke, Robbie Williams, Madonna, etc.) and the hoax would still have been published.

242:

Add your personal input and please discuss before making any further changes. We should come to a group consensus so that the discography is more usable and presentable for readers. --

229:

and you can see that the contributors aren't simply stuffing as much info as they can into the article. It's informative and compact, and it's fat has been trimmed off.

511:

How about not deleting links to other fan sites? There shouldn't be a monopoly on Coldplay sites. By not listing other fan sites you are not giving the whole story.

898:

nuetral party deciding whether the April Fools hoax is worthy of inclusion, I would also appreciate an apology from Madchester for his alegations of 'vandalism'.

173: 592:

I'm almost positive that Coldplay wrote that song for the Arcade Fire and gave it to them. I think it'd be more important putting it on the Arcade Fire page?--

888:. despite being an obvious hoax, the Labour Party's Media Monitoring Unit were concerned enough to circulate the story throughout "most of the government" 723:

Er, right; that's obvious from the article. I was asking if Coldplay has recorded him playing the tin whistle. My guess is no, but I wanted to be sure. --

236:

AUS and CAN chart figures into the infoboxes of the respective albums, singles and EPs to make the information on the Coldplay article more presentable.

285:

http://notontelevision.com/coldplay/coldplay%20hartford%20concert%20pit%20ticket%20view%2008%2004%202005%201st%20American%20Show%20of%20tour/index.html

714:

The fact is the before becoming the band's drummer, Champion played 4 or 5 other instruments. He didn't take up drumming before joining the band. --

630:

Actually, Knowledge (XXG)'s policy is that since this is a British topic, the article should be in British English. Feel free to edit away.--

352:

I don't think that Canada and Australia have that much of a prominence as Japan on the music industry has a whole, at least how you,

760: 174:

http://www.coldplaying.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=Sections&file=index&req=viewarticle&artid=566&page=1

271:

I've asked for feedback numerous times, so plz give any comments/suggestions on the changes before proceeding any further. --

745: 381:

To any other editors, make sure that this comment by a certain user doesn't slip through again. Not only is it against

886: 704:

change. However, I'm (cough) hardly an expert on the band, so if someone can correct me I'll put it back. Thanks! --

155:

I updated the photo with the one u provided; I've seen in a lot of promotional material, and labelled it as such. --

38: 885:, even going so far as to produce a fake song, "Talk to David", that could be downloaded via the Guardian website 297:

I readded the Canadian and Australian positions. Four positions from around the world don't make an article look

450:

is the new British music movement of the past 5 yrs or so. The original Britpop phase ended around 97 or 98.

92:

Is it really necessary to have Chris Martins marriage information at Coldplay's page? Since the vocalist has

99:

I'm going to add more sections to the Parachutes era... to differentiate it from the pre-Parachutes era. --

76: 71: 66: 951: 389: 788: 462: 1027: 602: 323: 318:

to see the amt. of clutter that something as simple as album positions can take up. Contrast that with

515:

There's already links to four separate fan sites, that have been referenced in the article. Note that

593: 530:) have been inserting links to Coldplay News, a site that has been online for less than a week (since 239:

Also should we be putting the months of release, or full date of release for singles and EPs as well?

187:

the piano, bass, and tin whistle. Before joining Coldplay, he performed in a band called Fat Hamster.

752: 134: 926:

Why should the Coldplay article devote an entire paragraph to some one-off April Fool's joke when,

133:

How about a new pic of Coldplay on the frontpage, since some of them have cut or grown their hair?

889: 201:

I believe Phil's not the band's manager anymore. He's still good mates with the band, however... --

866: 1006: 899: 843: 812: 724: 705: 1019: 883: 535: 469: 148:

Are pictures allowed that come from the seattlewireless server for example? I found this pic

584: 353: 302: 1023: 947: 939: 523: 516: 382: 958: 919:

Details on an April Fool's hoax, due to an author name-dropping Chris Martin: 1 paragragh

770: 741: 715: 685: 665: 647:

a) Coldplay? I saw them play the other day. OR b) Coldplay? I saw it play the other day.

553: 539: 498: 489: 410: 386: 344: 272: 256: 243: 202: 156: 142: 122: 100: 865:

journalist "Olaf Priol" claimed that Chris Martin had decided to publicly support the UK

877: 631: 400:

Parachutes which I think "boosted" its position in the U.K. - correct me if I'm wrong.

319: 943: 152:

and I want to resize it and then upload it to that server... Is that allowed? - Jurgen

870: 829:

Heh heh... Macarion didn't actually address the issue but nitpicked. Kudos Macarion!

821: 807: 674: 563: 425: 401: 361: 311: 191: 47: 17: 89:

Someone needs to edit the first paragraph of the article. It needs to be cleaned up

862: 838: 837:

I have to question why the Grauniard April fools day hoax section was moved to the

756: 458: 339: 335: 315: 93: 644:

I personally don't get the American thing here. Which sentence makes more sense?

1032: 700: 621: 517:

Knowledge (XXG) is not a mirror or a repository of links, images, or media files

226: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

975: 880: 874: 651: 1036: 1009: 961: 902: 846: 824: 815: 803: 791: 773: 727: 718: 708: 688: 677: 668: 654: 634: 624: 605: 596: 587: 566: 556: 542: 501: 492: 428: 413: 404: 364: 347: 305: 218: 852:'Madchester' is persistently removing the gfollowing text from the article; 1026:

to improve the encyclopedia aren't vandalism, even if people disagree. --

96:, I this it would be better to move information there. What do you think? 948:

WP:NOT#Knowledge (XXG) is not an indiscriminate collection of information

519:; there shouldn't be links that are not relevant to the article's content 454: 338:

article, and it doesn't give me actual concert listings... likewise, the

971: 447: 183:

Will Champion (born 31 July 1978) is the drummer of the band Coldplay.

149: 913: 497:

These are terms that journalists use. The rest of us call it music.

548:

Why not more? Why limit yourself? It is relevant to this topic.

135:

http://www.seattlewireless.net/images/uploaded/9118.1115377773.jpg

974:

story about 'a lottery winner' but the front page of a respected

170:

hey, i found a website that is plagiarizing from this article

531: 453:

The term is commonly used in the press to describe bands like

25: 946:, it does not warrant its inclusion in Knowledge (XXG), per 859: 538:

to promote your personal websites or endevaours. Thanks.--

222: 137:

for example, or maybe someone has a better one :) - Jurgen

527: 418:<<By what criteria is that claim being made?: --> 1022:

and didn't have to be announced via a test template.

534:). Knowledge (XXG) doesn't advocate the insertion of 820:Why do you keep calling it "Speak"? It's "Talk." 377:"(Clocks), the group's biggest single to date" 114:A) It's covered separately in the Yellow page 111:I removed the bit on the ABC-Yellow promo cuz 8: 930:A) It only refers to one member of the band 376: 330:And an encyclopedia doesn't need to contain 290:Comment - Canadian and Australian positions 421:be the "biggest single" or what not.: --> 873:due to his disillusionment with current 578:"Til Kingdom Come" and "Neighborhood #4" 263:Comment - CAN adn AUS charting positions 912:Details on Coldplay's contribution to 470:BBC:"Are we in Britpop's second wave?" 117:B) It's already covered in the text: 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 699:An anonymous IP user added a line to 673:My favorite band are Coldplay? No. -- 7: 908:Let's examine the Coldplay article: 480:Guardian UK: "My journey into sound" 283:Are any of these pictures allowed? 212:Sales figures and discography layout 150:http://www.coldplay.de/coldplay5.jpg 660:Of couse it's a no-brainer.. I saw 24: 916:: 1 sentence, less than 10 words. 334:information. I'm looking at the 970:Well I disagree. It wasn't some 740:Just a heads up; I've created a 232:I would recommend including the 190:For More information please see 85:Comment - Chris Martins marriage 29: 761:User:1ne/Userboxes/User MPH-ONE 751:I've also created one for the 689:20:48, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 429:16:02, 15 September 2005 (UTC) 414:14:58, 15 September 2005 (UTC) 405:02:35, 15 September 2005 (UTC) 390:22:28, 14 September 2005 (UTC) 1: 746:Template:User Make Trade Fair 736:Make Trade Fair user template 655:15:26, 18 February 2006 (UTC) 650:Surely this is a no-brainer? 502:14:22, 19 December 2005 (UTC) 475:PopMatters: Parachutes review 129:Comment - new pic of Coldplay 774:22:22, 29 January 2006 (UTC) 567:19:38, 5 December 2005 (UTC) 557:01:19, 5 December 2005 (UTC) 543:22:49, 4 December 2005 (UTC) 446:post-Britpop or second wave 442:"post-Britpop" vs. Brit Rock 383:Knowledge (XXG)'s POV policy 365:00:13, 22 October 2005 (UTC) 348:21:57, 21 October 2005 (UTC) 306:20:50, 21 October 2005 (UTC) 728:19:26, 7 January 2006 (UTC) 719:19:06, 6 January 2006 (UTC) 709:14:19, 6 January 2006 (UTC) 625:08:09, 6 January 2006 (UTC) 597:17:08, 6 January 2006 (UTC) 588:02:56, 6 January 2006 (UTC) 493:03:03, 7 October 2005 (UTC) 255:poor read at the moment. -- 1055: 1037:16:52, 11 April 2006 (UTC) 1010:16:42, 11 April 2006 (UTC) 962:00:30, 11 April 2006 (UTC) 903:16:14, 10 April 2006 (UTC) 792:09:27, 15 March 2006 (UTC) 526:) and another IP address ( 275:June 28, 2005 20:08 (UTC) 107:Comment - ABC-Yellow promo 847:23:49, 6 April 2006 (UTC) 825:00:57, 28 June 2006 (UTC) 816:23:42, 6 April 2006 (UTC) 678:00:54, 28 June 2006 (UTC) 669:19:21, 15 June 2006 (UTC) 635:17:01, 15 June 2006 (UTC) 259:20:27, 2005 Jun 26 (UTC) 246:21:50, 2005 Jun 15 (UTC) 205:11:50, 2005 Jun 14 (UTC) 125:17:27, 2005 Apr 27 (UTC) 103:18:06, 2005 Mar 23 (UTC) 606:13:05, 12 May 2006 (UTC) 159:03:58, 2005 May 10 (UTC) 145:13:01, 2005 May 6 (UTC) 983:lead singer of Coldplay 310:Refer to articles like 234:verified and referenced 991:attributed to Coldplay 942:. While this hoax is 536:external link spamming 166:Comment - plagiarizing 250:Comment - discography 42:of past discussions. 858:On April 1 2006 the 753:Make Poverty History 744:userbox template. ( 1024:Good-faith efforts 979:about Chris Martin 867:Conservative party 787:non-member users. 664:the other day. -- 279:pictures allowed? 82: 81: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 1046: 1030: 463:Franz Ferdinand) 320:U2's discography 63: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 1054: 1053: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1045: 1044: 1043: 1028: 835: 799: 784: 742:Make Trade Fair 738: 697: 617: 580: 509: 444: 379: 292: 281: 265: 252: 214: 199: 181: 168: 131: 109: 87: 59: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1052: 1050: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1039: 1013: 1012: 1001: 1000: 995: 994: 966: 935: 934: 931: 924: 923: 917: 906: 905: 894: 893: 878:prime minister 854: 853: 834: 831: 798: 795: 789:Darkroom Danny 783: 780: 778: 737: 734: 733: 732: 731: 730: 696: 693: 692: 691: 659: 638: 637: 616: 613: 579: 576: 574: 572: 571: 570: 569: 546: 545: 520: 508: 507:Fan site links 505: 483: 482: 477: 472: 443: 440: 438: 436: 435: 434: 433: 432: 431: 378: 375: 374: 373: 372: 371: 370: 369: 368: 367: 328: 291: 288: 280: 277: 264: 261: 251: 248: 213: 210: 208: 198: 195: 180: 177: 167: 164: 163: 162: 161: 160: 153: 130: 127: 108: 105: 86: 83: 80: 79: 74: 69: 64: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1051: 1038: 1034: 1031: 1025: 1021: 1017: 1016: 1015: 1014: 1011: 1008: 1007:quercus robur 1003: 1002: 997: 996: 992: 988: 984: 980: 977: 973: 969: 968: 967: 964: 963: 960: 955: 953: 952:WP:Importance 949: 945: 941: 932: 929: 928: 927: 922: 921:(shown above) 918: 915: 911: 910: 909: 904: 901: 900:quercus robur 896: 895: 892: 890: 887: 884: 882: 879: 876: 872: 871:David Cameron 868: 864: 861: 856: 855: 851: 850: 849: 848: 845: 844:quercus robur 840: 832: 830: 827: 826: 823: 818: 817: 814: 813:quercus robur 809: 808:Jonathon Ross 805: 796: 794: 793: 790: 781: 779: 776: 775: 772: 767: 764: 762: 758: 754: 749: 747: 743: 735: 729: 726: 722: 721: 720: 717: 713: 712: 711: 710: 707: 702: 694: 690: 687: 682: 681: 680: 679: 676: 671: 670: 667: 663: 657: 656: 653: 648: 645: 642: 636: 633: 629: 628: 627: 626: 623: 614: 612: 608: 607: 604: 603:Joanberenguer 599: 598: 595: 590: 589: 586: 577: 575: 568: 565: 560: 559: 558: 555: 551: 550: 549: 544: 541: 537: 533: 529: 528:68.76.102.121 525: 521: 518: 514: 513: 512: 506: 504: 503: 500: 495: 494: 491: 486: 481: 478: 476: 473: 471: 468: 467: 466: 464: 460: 456: 451: 449: 441: 439: 430: 427: 417: 416: 415: 412: 408: 407: 406: 403: 399: 394: 393: 392: 391: 388: 384: 366: 363: 359: 355: 351: 350: 349: 346: 341: 337: 333: 329: 325: 321: 317: 313: 312:Kylie Minogue 309: 308: 307: 304: 300: 296: 295: 294: 293: 289: 287: 286: 278: 276: 274: 269: 262: 260: 258: 249: 247: 245: 240: 237: 235: 230: 228: 224: 220: 211: 209: 206: 204: 196: 194: 193: 192:Will Champion 188: 184: 179:Will Champion 178: 176: 175: 171: 165: 158: 154: 151: 147: 146: 144: 140: 139: 138: 136: 128: 126: 124: 120: 115: 112: 106: 104: 102: 97: 95: 90: 84: 78: 75: 73: 70: 68: 65: 62: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 18:Talk:Coldplay 990: 986: 982: 978: 965: 956: 936: 925: 920: 907: 857: 839:Chris Martin 836: 833:Moving hoax? 828: 819: 800: 785: 777: 768: 765: 757:ONE Campaign 750: 739: 725:Craig Stuntz 706:Craig Stuntz 698: 672: 661: 658: 649: 646: 643: 639: 618: 609: 600: 591: 581: 573: 547: 524:66.213.13.50 510: 496: 487: 484: 452: 445: 437: 397: 380: 360:clutter it. 357: 340:Caesar salad 336:Ticketmaster 331: 298: 282: 270: 266: 253: 241: 238: 233: 231: 215: 207: 200: 189: 185: 182: 172: 169: 132: 118: 116: 113: 110: 98: 94:his own page 91: 88: 60: 43: 37: 701:Tin whistle 695:Tin whistle 594:Mondayrocks 585:Anthony5429 532:November 30 354:Winnermario 303:Winnermario 197:Phil Harvey 36:This is an 976:broadsheet 959:Madchester 944:verifiable 881:Tony Blair 875:New Labour 782:"See also" 771:Madchester 716:Madchester 686:Well quite 666:Madchester 554:Madchester 540:Madchester 522:Both you ( 499:Adambisset 490:Madchester 411:Madchester 387:Madchester 345:Madchester 273:Madchester 257:Madchester 244:Madchester 203:Madchester 157:Madchester 143:Madchester 123:Madchester 101:Madchester 1020:vandalism 804:Kraftwerk 797:Kraftwerk 632:Esprit15d 299:cluttered 219:Radiohead 77:Archive 4 72:Archive 3 67:Archive 2 61:Archive 1 999:parties. 863:Guardian 822:Macarion 675:Macarion 662:the band 564:Drdr1989 455:Coldplay 426:Drdr1989 402:Drdr1989 362:Drdr1989 981:who is 972:tabloid 869:leader 766:Enjoy! 465:, etc. 448:Britpop 39:archive 940:WP:BIO 914:Live 8 622:Bevo74 615:Is/Are 398:before 225:, and 1033:lkman 652:Vanky 459:Keane 422:: --> 419:: --> 316:Oasis 16:< 950:and 327:Two. 324:RHCP 227:Muse 1035:- 987:not 763:). 759:. ( 358:not 332:all 322:or 314:or 985:, 957:-- 954:. 860:UK 769:-- 748:) 583:-- 488:-- 461:, 457:, 223:U2 221:, 121:-- 1029:E 891:. 755:/ 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index