Talk:Coldplay/Archive 2 - Knowledge (XXG)

3672:"Let the facts speak for themselves" - Neutral Point of View. We have sources citing facts about a band's 'product endorsement' viewpoints. And here we have a source citing their advertising method for their music and endorsing through exclusivity a music service to access it. It's relevant to the Section on the band's article. Should this source not be cited on band's section about activism on product endorsement? If we provide the sources, then how does that go against Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on personal reporting? We're providing the reader facts surrounding the band's definition of a "product endorsement." It would be bias to leave this source out of the picture of their activism section. -- 1302:

gigs for local Camden promoters and the delight of their budding fanbase." (from "Formation"); "Martin kicked Champion out of the band but later pleaded with him to return and due to his guilt, Martin (a self-proclaimed non-drinker and non-smoker) went on a drinking binge" (also from "Formation") is a run-on sentence and also unsourced; "June 2000 was a pivotal moment in Coldplay's history. The band embarked on their first headlining tour, which included a triumphant return to Glastonbury." (from "Parachutes"); "In May, Coldplay teased fans with a new song"..." (from "X&Y"); etc. This is such a recurring problem that I won't even go through all of its instances.

3620:

have iTunes, I should probably use the service to listen to my favorite band's new song." That's how endorsement works. Coldplay is endorsing using the iTunes' service exlusively to access their music. Why can't I use Amazon's service to get the song? That's right. A contract was made so their fans would Have to use the iTunes service. I can get the Violet Hill song on Amazon right now in mp3, yet not Viva la Vida. That's endorsement. And if it isn't I don't know what is. They can't claim they refuse to use their music in product endorsements without sounding like hypocrites in this case. Better to just take the section down for editing.--

2370:

wanting to know who she is can click the link. I was simply offering the description to add more continuity to the sentence, as well as add a bit of extra knowledge to the article. Not everyone clicks links; sometimes people should be prompted to interesting facts such as that Chris Martin is married to a famous actress. As an aside, I was wondering what constitutes a "valid" wikipedia edit; that is how good must an edit be for it to be retained. I am using wiki increasingly for research use and I would like to know for future reference. Thank you. -A.H. , 17:24, Fri 25 January 2008

4410:

Satriani video and friends I have who like Radiohead and say that CP blatantly from them. I think if we really were going to make a change to this page, we should change their bio from "alternative rock band" to "U2 cover band", they try so hard its really pathetic. Anyway, yeah I don't think it should be included in this page until its verified by legitimate sources. BUT, I do think mention should be made of the uncanny similiarities in the section for the new album. What do you think Madchester?

3695:. Putting it simply, there's a good dozen or so reliable sources commentating on the iTunes promotion. However, none of these sources have claimed that the deal goes against the band's advertising stance. And that's the crux of the issue. You can add the details of the iTunes deal in the section since it's properly referenced. However saying that it "goes against the band's principles" violates both wiki-policies above, since that's a personal claim, not one stated in any reliable source. -- 1744:: "In British English, it is generally accepted that collective nouns can take either singular or plural verb forms depending on the context and the metonymic shift that it implies. For example, "the team is in the dressing room" (formal agreement) refers to the team as an ensemble, whilst "the team are fighting among themselves" (notional agreement) refers to the team as individuals." I believe that since the article heading refers to the group as an ensemble, the former usage would be correct. 3463:. At the end of the commercial it clearly states, "Exclusively on iTunes." If it was merely advertising Coldplay as being available on most popular music-downloading outlets -including- iTunes then it would be a different case. But it states exclusivity, and thus being a product endorsement. I think it should be noted in the Activism section. They shouldn't be able to claim that they don't do product endorsement when a commercial directly contradicts that statement. -- 31: 3568:

the commercial text claims exclusive availability on Apple's iTunes music downloading service." OR, do we need a quote of representation from the band itself talking about their position on this topic? How does this need to presented? A new sub-section? Or rewrite the beginning of the section? Such as: "Despite Coldplay's worldwide popularity, the band has remained protective of how their music is used in the media,

3907:

atmosphere, that by no means equals plagiarism. It's almost laughable from a musical standpoint to even think that. I should also point out that I'm no fan of Coldplay, au contraire, I think they are one of the most mediocre, crappy acts to ever grace the contemporary soundscape. But fair is fair, and you are going to need a little more than some indie bands YouTube video to be able to accuse someone of stealing.

3605:

order to be an endorsement of iTunes there would have to be some statement or implication made that iTunes is a good service and/or that consumers ought to use it. No such statement or implication is made. A mere reference to it being available there does not advance such a claim. Maybe Coldplay is showing some favor to iTunes by having an exclusive agreement. But that is not the same thing as an endorsement.

2314:

2006. And so as to continue with the rest of the article's design and idea we should put the dates since the "chapter" of the band's history started till it ends, not only the year the album was released. I believe this helps the reader a lot in order to have a clear picture of the band's history and different phases and moments. That is why I will keep on adding this to the article. (

340:

section, found in many other band articles on wikipedia, is inserted near the bottom of the page, and the April Fools hoax, along with an appropriate link, be included here. This would also be a good place to mention their appropriation of the hook from Kraftwerk's "Computer Love" for "Talk" and other such footnotes without disrupting the flow of the main article.

4156:

for-profit business is about the most unreliable way of disseminating information in the world. I understand that Knowledge (XXG) operates that way, which is truly sad, but come on Madchester, watch the video. It's so obvious. I don't suggest that we accuse them of plagiarism. Just note that there has been some talk of similarities (vis a vis the video).

948:

include many of the influences listed. But being a flexible Wiki-editor, I don't mind filling the gaps for other editors who had forgotten to include references. I'm an administrator on Knowledge (XXG), but I still take an active role in participating in articles that may need work, regardless of my actual level of expertise of the topic. Please

1711:). The group therefore comprises Chris Martin et al. It isn't "comprised of" its members. Apologies, but I find myself reverting on this rather a lot. Maybe I was a little off the mark in my latest edit by saying that there is no such expression: it's such a common error that some dictionaries now acknowledge it anyway, but I found this quote from 4061:; there's no editorial screening (like a blog), meaning anyone could use it to share any pinion online. Just because a blog/Youtube video made a public statement that Coldplay is awesome/awful/fake/inspiring/etc. doesn't mean it's true. The same opinion has to be voiced by a reliable source, say a critic in order for it to be reproduced in Wiki. 324:- The edit was clearly not vandalism, but I agree it was misplaced. I strongly feel that the info should go on Chris Martin's page; it has nothing do with Coldplay THE BAND - and the article should be focued on Coldplay. Band article across Knowledge (XXG) are filled with trivia about individual members, whose own pages are often stubs. -- 3251: 743:'s "Computer Love". Coldplay specifically asked Kraftwerk to get permission to use that riff. Likewise, "'Til Kingdom Come" was written specifically as a colloboration with Johnny Cash, who died just weeks before they would have recorded it together in a studio. In turn, the band has regularly performed a cover of Cash's " 1392:

supposed integrity of their favorite band. Tom Waits, who is - for some reason - far less popular than Coldplay, doesnt have anything about his notorious and extensive entanglements with the ad industry in his introduction. And its not like there aren't plenty of other bands that refuse to sell their songs either.....

3657:, when the press have not criticized the band for being "hypocrites" with the iTunes marketing whatsoever. Until a reliable source like the NYT or NME specifically state that the band changed their advertising stance, it's simply personal commentary/research and neither is allowed on Knowledge (XXG). -- 5992:

US), "A Rush Of Blood To The Head" an approximate 9 million (6 of which in the UK and in the US), "X&Y" 8,3 million and "Viva La Vida" 5,1 up to date, which brings global sales to a total of 29,4. Even of we wanted to boost them, we would come to over 30 million, which is still far from 40 million.

5038:

need to be from a third party. The official site would still be considered a primary source, I believe. Also the source cheekily calls the band as a "hell-raising rock combo", so I don't know how much seriousness was actually put into the post/complaint. You still want to deal with any errors ASAP

4966:

This is a bit strange - I've found an interview with Rice-Oxley which says "...a four-piece band with an Irish guitarist who used to be called Coldplay..." and "'We though the Coldplay name was too depressing so I ended up giving it away to a guy I knew at college - Chris Martin. I believe he's still

4503:

If you follow the Franz Ferdinand talk page, most editors decided that despite the band having English-born members, it's considered a Scottish-based band, since it was formed in Glasgow. Some random editor(s) inserted the British tag and it has gone unchanged in a while. Also, the article has been

4267:

I guess the argument would be over the word "knowledgeable". Since we have established that reliable sources are indeed willing to report on plagiarism, and that the YouTube video in question IS on topic and does relate to plagiarism, and on top of that, is more relevant to the plagiarism allegations

4155:

The reliable source is called my ears and brain. It's ridiculous to look at that video and say that it's not valid until a corporation says it is. That's elitist and in my opinion contrary to what a peer-reviewed encyclopedia should be. Arbitrarily relegating the task of information verification to a

3820:

Search my ass instead. I read the correct Brit grammar after writing the talk, and deleted my talk above (Severe grammatical errors throughout article). The fact that you undid my own talk article and called it " an unconstructive edit" just goes to show what a joke you guys are. Keep fighting the

1843:

Let's assess this situation... "Coldplay" is a band. It may be made up of more than one person, but it is still singular. Why? Because there can be many Coldplays. Or, what if I said "The faculty are planning the winter formal." Does that make sense at all? No. Why? Because faculty, like Coldplay, is

1314:

Criterion 6- images: As brought up in this article's Featured Article candidacy, multiple images have rationales that don't make sense. The image in the infobox is fair use, but it should not be used, as I'm quite sure that there is a free use alternative. The image of Martin from the "Fix You" video

629:

As I said before, I never added most of those influences; they had been inserted by other editors over the past year and a half. If you reviewed the edit history, you'll see that I had already removed a number of unsourced references. The band's influences are a good indicator of its genre and also

485:

As a huge Coldplay fan I felt I had to change a thing or two in the paragraph about songs they played on the A Rush Of Blood To The Head Tour but later rejected for X&Y. I can clear it up that the song Your World Turned Upside Down was only ever performed live and has never appeard on an official

155:

leanings. The argument below about how it is inapropriate given that the rest of the more important projects only have one sentance each does not mean it shouldn't be included, only that those sentances should be extended. I would agree with moving it to another article except that by itself it would

5298:

I refer you you both to the honkin' great big British English box at the talk of this page. In BrE, if the pronoun "they" is appropriate, one would never use the singular in conjunction with the proper noun. (And bands are invariably "they"s, and not "it"s.) I shall endeavour to fix the remaining

5243:

Okay, so I just read the article regarding the differences between AmE and BrE, and they state that, with collective nouns, it is decided whether the emphasis is "on the body as a whole (singular) or on the individual members (plural)". From many of the uses in the article, it seems like it's on the

5123:

The title of Coldplay's upcoming EP should be changed from Prospect's March to Prospekt's March. While a number of news articles have cited the name with a C rather than with a K this is most likely a mistake made by uninformed writers and editors and not the intent of the band who clearly indicated

4632:

joined the group it didn't become "English-Welsh". Likewise, with Martin living on both sides of the pond, if he were to get American citizenship would Coldplay become an "English-American" or "British-American" group? It's just silly to rely on individual nationality/citizenship to represent that

4366:

The funny thing about this discussion, is that if anyone with ears and a brain watches that youtube video, they would know beyond any reasonable doubt that Coldplay copied Joe Satriani's "If I could fly". It will come out anyway, and people will know Coldplay has been copying other artists. Even the

3774:

In several instances, Coldplay is followed with have. For Example, "Coldplay have been one of the most successful bands of the new millenium." Coldplay is an entity, a group of people make up "Coldplay". Several little Coldplays dont make up many Coldplay. Please, somebody fix this immediately.

3567:

How do you think this should be added to the section? Here's my proposition; "Although the band claims to not be a part of product endorsement, Coldplay began a marketing campaign on May 20th, 2008 with a commercial advertising their new single "Viva la Vida" from their upcoming album. At the end of

3503:

The band is using iTunes to promote and sell the single. It's no different than the band premiering "Violet Hill" on Radio 1 or MySpace. They're promoting their own work, which so happens to be played, sold, or hosted by a third party. By your logic, if the band had a live performance on the Late

1957:

That phrase has actually been repeatedly replaced and removed. If it is to be restored, I recommend that it is absorbed into the last sentence of the first paragraph ("Coldplay has been one of the most successful acts of the new millennium, selling over 35 million albums to date."), which also needs

1621:

I would like to see this article get the Good Article status it missed back in November, and would like to help personally. Is there anyone willing to make a list of what changes are needed and any other formatting? I'm still relatively new to editing Knowledge (XXG) on a larger scale than grammar

1606:

All of Coldplay's 14 singles will be released as a box set called "The Singles 1999-2006" on March 26... I was wondering if any of you out there would like to add such information to the page, and possibly even put it under next studio release and describe it kind of as a gap release between X&Y

1391:

I could have sworn I heard....a Coldplay song (they all sound the same, I think it was Speed Of Sound) on an insurance company advert here in the UK. Also is it really important enough to be mentioned in the introduction? Its inclusion smells to me like a overzealous fan wanting to shout about the

1170:

Why I do not endorse these posters and so much photos around? Because, Coldplay is a little more than a hald-decade around. Oasis and Radiohead are on the music scene for much of the 90s. Their respective histories are longer. Nor disrespect for Coldplay and their fans, but Coldplay are younger band

1166:

About the posters, issues. Nor, Oasis, nor Radiohead pages have posters. Oasis has a photo of every line-up of the band. The missing is the last, as Starkey is not yet confirmed as an official bandmember. Radiohead has one photo of the band and some bandmember photos, not poster photos, as they have

1162:

Probably, you don't mind, but Christ Martin looks like a hairy monkey with that hair and beard. Also it's not coloured, it is orange and it's not so good. Please, can't we find another pic of Coldplay? Martin is good looking guy, but with hair and beard - he's not Thom Yorke, whom the lazy eye makes

364:

article. There's no need to duplicate the material on another Knowledge (XXG) article, when the hoax was directed at Martin. Last year, there were problems with the Coldplay article, because users were adding CM's personal details to it (i.e., his marraige to Paltrow, baby girl named Apple, etc.),

5991:

Actually, if you count global sales for all their albums, including their latest effort, you find out they've sold 30 million records in all, not 40. According to the pages of Knowledge (XXG) devoted to their albums, "Parachutes" sold an approximate 7 million copies (5 of which in the UK and in the

5481:

I completely agree with Ladyjanegrey94 on that. Many of Coldplay's songs start off with a piano, such as Speed of Sound, What If, The Scientists, and Death and All His Friends, as well as a few songs that *only* have a voice and piano part, like Lost?. The majority of their songs have a piano part

4947:

If you look through the article history, I was the one who added the bit about "mutual friend Tim suggesting the name Coldplay". I don't know how the "Tim" in the original source became Tim Rice-Oxley of Keane. Rice-Oxley did an interview with Q, discussing his invitation to join Coldplay back in

3619:

Favoritism, endorsement, agreement ... call it what you will. They could have easily have plugged their song out to all accessible online music outlets. There's a difference between stating "Exclusively on iTunes" and "Available on iTunes." When I saw that commercial it made me think, "hrm, I don't

3518:

EXCLUSIVELY on iTunes. They are not merely trying to sell singles. If they wanted to sell singles they would be available from any music downloading outlet. Period. The fact that it's exclusively on iTunes makes it product endorsement. They are using the Apple trademark to boost their sales, and so

3440:

I've recently seen a LOT of these airing on several different channels.. does this count as product endorsement?? I was reading the "Activism" section and this goes directly against what they were talking about does it not? OK sure it's promoting their song Viva la Vida and that you can download it

2813:

Got suggestions for where I could look to build this section? I know I can browse news articles, etc. but anything more specific, such as what to look for, keywords, etc. Also, I've visited a few musical artist FAs in the past and not all have a 'musical style' section; some are just a biographical

2313:

I believe that it is ok to put the formation on 1996-1999, but it should state that Coldplay started in 1998 as an actual act with that name. also, the dates for the 4 album. shouls be 2006- (probably it will end up being 2006-2009 or 2006-2010) because the band started working on it since December

1901:

Why is it that when I mention this part to the article, it gets deleted. I GAVE SOURCES. The Swizz Beatz colloboration comes from Billboard.com and Timbaland said himself that he was working with that band from a GQ magazine article. The mention of Brian Eno was added to the article before the band

987:

In case you missed what I said earlier, I don't even think the paragraph should BE in the article, therefore I am not going to contribute to its sourcing and its existence. I'm already compromising with you by trying to clean it up. If it MUST be there, at least let it done properly. I am not going

657:

I cannot communicate any further with you if you must call every little thing I say to you that doesn't sit well with you a "personal attack". You're also talking in circles and repeating points that I have already addressed. I maintain the article in its current state is embarassingly amateurishly

455:

What is the status of this matter? The result of the discussion was that it should not be included, with good reason, and you should ask yourself whether this material is appropriate for an encyclopedia (will anyone be interested in this even as soon as April 1, 2007, let alone a few years on? Will

4034:

These are reputable news sites. All with the same information. People need to know the truth about this- Again, the youtube video exhibits factual content in the form of MUSIC. How can you prove something in a discussion that is about sounds without posting that video? Oh and there is screening on

1355:

The source is referenced multiple times and adding citations to each detail is far too excessive. The reference section is used to cover more comprehensive resources. Likewise, a book has been used as a secondary source in the article, but it's not practical to provide an inline citation to each

1310:

reference (in addition to half a dozen external jumps) in the entire article; this is unacceptable for a GA. Even facts such as (these are general examples) "this album debuted at #1 on the charts" or "this single was not as well-received" need citations, and statements such as (this is a specific

947:

And I ask you this. I would kindly suggest that you help out by also looking for any additional references. Instead of taking a passive role of critiquing other people's work, I encourage taking an active role in participating and contributing actual content to the article. I personally did not

550:

I found the external links of the band's official website and myspace page to be wrong, so I put the right links. Also there was a Official Bebo Bands page, which I found to link to cold-play.net, and it seems to be a false link, so I deleted it. Note: most of the links are to cold-play.net, so if

5561:

Coldplay's Chris Martin has suggested that he plans to split up the band at the end of 2009. The frontman told the Daily Express that his decision was based on his view that bands should call it a day before they get too old – saying he wanted to go out with a blast by keeping as busy as possible

4782:

There are lots of web site that talking about Coldplay and most of them regard Coldplay as an 'Post-Britpop Band'.And also the articles "Alternative Rock" in the Knowledge (XXG) mention that Coldplay is an 'Post-Britpop Group' just like Travis.So Why Knowledge (XXG) does not regard Coldplay as an

3928:

Coldplay ARE rip-off Artists. Influence is one thing, but taking someone else's work and changing it enough to call it your own is not art, its stealing from the poor, playing with house money, and cheating true music lovers out of genuine, original music. I AM a Coldplay fan, and Art is the real

3480:

In the activism paragraph, it states that Coldplay basically doesn't want to sell out. That is, have their songs being used for Coke commercials and et cetera. What about the band's 30 second snippet for iTunes? Is that a sellout? Isn't Apple using their song "Viva la Vide" to promote iTunes, the

1301:

Criterion 1(a)- compelling prose: There are many problems in relation to tone, and some of them are also NPOV (violating Criterion 4, but I'm lumping this issue into Crit. 1). To wit: "Coldplay are one of very few current British music acts..." (from the lead); "Coldplay was performing small club

623:

on part of the multiple editors who have contributed to this article. If you truly wish to improve the accuracy of this article, then I would encourage your active particpation in helping us search for valid citations to the article. I've invested quite a bit of time resarching into the article

350:

Sounds like a good compromise. The wikipedia policies section mentioned above does specify that section such as this shouldn't be included. But a trivial section would be a good addition, and the April Fools mention would fit well there. It is important to keep the article significant, but the

4409:

Well, after watching the Satriani video, I have to say it's a little suspicious, as the melody and chord progression are the exact same. However as I said before, musical plagiarism is a very grey area. I personally am inclined to think that Coldplay do plagiarize material, based solely off that

3604:

The song being released exclusively for iTunes, does not constitute an endorsement of iTunes. It may give iTunes a market advantage, but that is not the same thing as an endorsement. It is an ad for their music; if they are endorsing any product with the ad, it is their music, and not iTunes. In

3075: 2090:

Can anyone explain why the grammar in this article is so inconsistent? Is that the intent of British English? A band is an object, therefore it should be referred to it as "it" not "they". It really doesn't make much sense for consistency across other band pages. The first sentence (I edited it)

5370:

Just alternative rock is way way way too vague. It doesn't describe their soudn enough. if I was to visit this article with no knowledge of their sound, Iw ould think they sound just like every other alt. band out there. I think "piano rock" (dominant use of piano) and "britpop" (they often are

5313:

Sorry - I'm American, not British, so I don't know all the differences in grammar between the two countries. Yes, Knowledge (XXG) is edited by people with different grammar educations because it is an international, multi-lingual encyclopedia. British English is different in several ways from

2122:

articles. To quote the MoS, "If an article has evolved using predominantly one variety, the whole article should conform to that variety, unless there are reasons for changing it on the basis of strong national ties to the topic". The article has evolved using British English, and the band have

1193:

How did I miss this for two months. For the ones having seen this, this guy is only complaining about band photos on their articles. I kept on fighting with him on a revert war on Keane for two months until he gave up. Coldplay are highly superior than Oasis and Radiohead. The age does not mean

3906:

If you really want to push that issue, then be prepared to edit a Plagiarism section into every artist page on Knowledge (XXG). Art (especially music) is a game of influences and inspirations. I can find a lot of differences in those two songs, and just because they might have the same mood or

2369:

I tried to add "the American actress" (sort of an "encyclopedia style" description) in front of the Gwyneth Paltrow link in the Political_and_Social_Activism section, the final section of the article. It was however removed by someone, perhaps the article's steward, on the grounds that anyone

570:

Your latest link for citation 1 (the third you've attempted in 24 hours - why are you on such a mission to insert all these influences at the start of the article? Why is it that important?) has Martin mentioning Jeff Buckley, but Martin is not Coldplay. He does not speak for the entire band.

339:

Well, from the poll results so far it would appear that, apart from you and I, nobody else could care less either way whether the April Fools joke should be in this article. As we both have strong views and are unlikely to reach a consensus I propose a compromise in that a 'trivia' or 'notes'

5905:

It says their music hasn't been used in any campaign ads or whatever, but I distinctly remember hearing "Yellow" in an ad for Cancer Council's Daffodil Day (I think it's just an Australian thing?). Is this worth noting or does somebody already know about it and just lumps it in with Coldplay

3846:

where it states: "The difference occurs for all nouns of multitude, both general terms such as team and company and proper nouns (for example, where a place name is used to refer to a sports team). For instance, BrE: The Clash are a well-known band; AmE: The Clash is a well-known band." I'm

3709:

Ok, thanks for clearing that up. So at the end of the section I'll add, "On May 20th, 2008, Coldplay began a marketing campaign with a commercial advertising their new single "Viva la Vida" from their upcoming album, Violet Hill. At the end of the commercial, text claims the song's exclusive

2053:

There has been an "edit war" going on recently concerning the use of British or American English for the article. The flag helps to give a clear indication which style to use, but I'll freely admit that this is a rather weak justification for its existence. As I understand it, flag icons are

1816:

I dug up a few sites that deal with this issue. They all agree that in British English "When you use a collective noun, it may be followed by either a singular or plural verb, depending on whether you are thinking of the group as a unit, in which case it will be singular, or as a number of

4085:. Defamatory material about individuals is not permitted on Knowledge (XXG), especially claims that are not backed up by any credible sources. I'm already generous by not removing this talk section, since WP:BLP states that any such contentious material should be removed immediately. -- 4999:

I'm also a bit wary of adding Phil Harvey as a fifth member to the article. I know he's had an important role in the band's history, but outside of the band themselves, he's never been credited as a member of the group. I'd rather describe him as an unofficial member of the band, like

1274:

on joyo.com (Amazon-owned online store in China) has 'Careful Where You Stand' in place of 'Spies' (track 3), so it may be the case that it was blocked originally but then allowed to be released with 'Spies' removed. Still can't find an authoritative source to back that claim up though.

3376:

In the article, their forthcoming album is said to be released on the 16th. However, the album's earliest release date is (according to their website) the 11th. I do not know what the official Wikipedian policy on this is, so if the American release date is common practice, then fine.

2551:. This article is often used in this article, understandingly, but the information it provides is not always accurate — it is basically a blog, if I recall correctly. Please try not to use it in this article if possible, thanks! A good place to find news articles as references is the 1729:

Can we just settle the dispute between whether or not "Coldplay is" / "Coldplay are" will be used at the beginning of the article. I'm not a grammar expert, but the constant reverts are getting annoying. Can someone just make a decision and have the grammatical proof to justify

1305:

Criterion 2- verifiability: Many of the statements- and, in fact, many paragraphs- are completely unverified. The number of citations for an article of this length is, in my view, too low for a Good Article. After the lead and first paragraph of the next section, there is only

3481:

iTunes store and the Apple iPod? I tried looking up any statements from the band but couldn't find any explaining why they allowed Apple to use their song when it states in this paragraph that they don't do that sort of thing. Any comments? Should the paragraph be rewritten?

6020:

I think reconsideration of this matter is required. To this date, Viva La Vida has sold 6.9 million copies, which makes the total number of sales to around 31.4 million. At least instead of putting “they have sold 30 million albums”, we can say “OVER 30 million albums”.

1864:

The word "family" is just like "faculty" and "Coldplay". For example, would you say "My family eat everyday" or "My family eats everyday"? I would say the latter, because family, although being composed of numerous people, is a singular noun, just like Coldplay. This is

486:

release however The World Turned Upside Down which is a completly different song found its way onto the B-Side of the Fix You single. I can see where the confusion may arise but believe me they are totally different songs! {{Subst:unsigned|TedTheRed|21:15, 3 May 2006}

4518:

Guy Berryman is Scottish, it would seem reasonable to refer to them as British. Similarly, if some members of Franz Ferdinand are English the same should apply. However, where a band is all Scottish, the Scottish epithet should apply. Seems straightforward to me.

4069:

Context is always important, especially when reviewing wire sources, which simply piece together multiple news excerpts. Namely the wire source took the original story about the band being accused of plagiarism (allegations have now been retracted by Creaky Boards

3519:

is Apple vica versa. If this was not product endorsement it would read at the end "Available on iTunes," not "Exclusively on iTunes." Your talk/radio show analogy doesn't hold up, since they don't EXCLUSIVELY sing for one show. It should be noted on the section. --

685:

I said no such thing. You are twisting my comments into something I obviously did not say, in effect you are the one doing the personal attacking, even as you passive-aggressively keep trying to turn it around on me. I give up attempting to communicate with you.

865:"Clocks" and "Daylight" were apparently recorded under the guidance of Echo and the Bunnymen frontman Ian McCulloch, and both songs possess an influence from the infamous neo-psychedelic band ("Daylight", especially, which owes a lot to McCulloch's "The Cutter") 712:

The article stated flatly that Coldplay were influenced by Kraftwerk and Johnny Cash, but the link given as a source is a record reviewer basically saying that, in his opinion, he hears those influences. Not the same thing. I amended this. I also removed the

3565:"The 30-second ad, filmed by acclaimed director Mark Romanek, aired on American Idol at 8pm East Coast Time and featured a clip of the band performing the new single Viva La Vida. An accompanying graphic stated: Viva La Vida Coldplay exclusively on iTunes." 1947:"an overview of the common interpretations of a creative work, preferably with citations or references to notable individuals holding that interpretation", so maybe a mention of the critical consensus would be appropriate in the lead paragraph. Thoughts? — 2631:

A "bona fide stadium act" somehow just doesn't sound like encyclopedic verbiage. I know it goes on to mention the stage lights and screens, but it sounds more like an opinion to me. By who's standard would they have been considered that, unless we had a

2374:

I think your edit was completely legitimate. It's a simple and concise description, and it's true not everybody would click on the link. It also gives a little background/context. I've been at FA nominations where editors have suggested the same. Cheers.

1365:

So, in other words, you expect the average person who questions the validity of a statement such as "Chris Martin wanted to do a boy band" to simply say, "Oh, well, I guess that's probably in one of those books." That's not what makes a GA or FA. Look at

3545:. The Activism section is based on articles and interviews from creditable media outlets reporting on the band's stance against product placement - likewise sources need to be cited when mentioning any changes in the band's philosophy on advertising. -- 4424:

If the editors of NME/AP/NYT/etc. take a look at the video and decide to report on it, then yes, we can also mention it on Wiki, since we have valid sources documenting the incident. Right now it's not making headlines like the Creaky Boards incident.

378:, not just Chris Martin, had recorded a song supporting David Cameron, and even cobbled up a downloadable fake song ("Talk" with new lyrics placed over the top) and that is why i feel it is appropriate for inclusion on this page in some form or another 2584:

I just noticed that the recently added coldplaying.com links are more like track listings instead of 'news', so that's more acceptable since it's stating something that isn't controversial or anything. But still, another source would be better, like

1869:, by the way, and I have not logged in yet, but I will sign my post when I do. Please, don't make it more complicated than it has to be. I've asked my grammar teachers to clarify this for me at school, and they would agree with what I'm saying. – 908:

an important role of Knowledge (XXG)'s editors. Yes, editors should be held accountable for the information they enter, but at the same time, those doing the fact-checking wouldn't do themselves any harm by doing some actual research themselves.

470:

I boldly removed the "influences" section, since Knowledge (XXG) prefers prose over lists, and it was already mentioned in the body of the article. I also removed "similar bands" since that is totally unverifible and incredibly subjective and

3978:

the youtube videos are not examples of original research as they are factual accounts based on the topic of discussion. If the judgement above is based on the facts of a widely published article, then it is not original- just like Coldplay.

4103:

Well, I will have to disagree with you there Madchester. I think accusing these individuals of trying to defame Coldplay is a little presumptive. I know where they are coming from. I will review those links and videos and decide for myself.

1332:

There's a difference bewteen in-line citations and references. If you examine the list of references cited, you will find most of the information in the article can be verified. For example the "unbelievable" *NSYNC reference of the band

1249:

The album wasn't banned, but the track 'Spies' was removed (I think the official line was "due to political sensitivity"). It was answered in the Q&A on the band's official site a few years ago. I'll have a look for a decent source on

4579:

True, but Adam came to Ireland at the age of 5 and The Edge was only 1 year old, when his family moved to Ireland. Although both are British citizens, they were raised in and around Dublin. For all that matters, they could be Irish.....

2717:"Coldplay's early material was compared to acts such as Jeff Buckley and Radiohead, while also drawing comparisons to U2 and Travis." - being compared to and drawing comparisons to are essentially the same thing...also, no ref for Travis? 1587:

sorry if this is repetitive, but I saw on their site about a toronto concert filming that would be aired later on, and maybe available on DVD (?) Any help with understanding what's happeneing would be good. Sorry if this is repeating the

725:(note this is not even referring necessarily to their musical style!) this one person's opinion and vague comparison is important enough to be snowballed into fact by making it the first sentence in the second paragraph of their article? 933:

some of the stuff you just mentioned are still various rock critics giving their own opinions of "obvious" influences. To say "Coldplay is influenced by Oasis", we need a source with an actual band member stating words to this effect.

499:

In Australia Coldplay is on just about every television network ad there is. I'm certain that channel 10 has used "yellow" many times over the years, and channel 9 has used one of their songs as well. Is that comment truthful at all?

1554:

Maybe he was refering to the lyrics? 'we live in a beatiful world, ...' Yea the song's called Don't Panic. But what about the song played in Live 2003; 'See you Soon'. I can't figure on which album it would be other than that one

1043:

The link called (I think; Jeff Bennettit's at the end of the paragraph about X&Y awards) is broken, as VH1 have updated their site. I have tried to find this article and fix the link, but as yet I can't. Any chances of help?

4009:. If there's claims of "plagiarism" they need to be supported by articles from reliable media sources. Even then, the content has to meet the site's WP:NPOV guidelines, we can't misreport or write libel about individuals, per 3686:

Reliable sources like media commentators or the band have to comment on the nature of "exclusivity" and whether it is considered a change in the band's advertising policy. We as wiki-editors can't draw personal conclusions per

4174:. But it's been discussed numerous times and the consensus is that video sites are not valid sources. Even Youtube internet memes have to be verified for notability via third-party sources for inclusion on Knowledge (XXG). -- 3885: 2635:

It's not very clear when they were on the ROBTTH tour; was it during most of the 15-month touring spree, or only part of it? An outside reader, like myself, might be a little confused. I suggest merge some of the content from

2248:

That doesn't really confirm that Prospekt is the new album name. It says "one minute we're all buzzing about the mix of Prospekt's March" - this might be refering to a song named "Prospekt's March" or maybe the album title is

4481:

so why do english nationalists continually change Franz Ferdinand back to "British" then? i think you should provide the rules you are using; it sounds like something you made up, as plenty of other bands are called British.

4130:

because of the original YouTube video. There are thousands of YouTube videos comparing samples between different music artists, but we can only report on the ones that have been documented and screened by reliable sources.

1174:

Therefore, I consider the amount of posters on the page, meaningless. Come on, guys, the band is 6-year old on the music scene, why so much posters? Nor, Radiohead, nor Oasis have these posters. Try to be reasonable.

387:

I agree that a "Notes" section would be appropriate for such a paragraph. Good compromise, and it's the kind of useless piece of information that people like to find out... which is why Knowledge (XXG) is so great!

3394:

They ARE these genres whether you like it or not. Unfortunately, I can't find any good sources saying so, because most sources are denied by the wankstains that run this site. So, can anyone find any GOOD sources?

4608:

history. The U2 example was to highlight the use of the band's city of formation (Dublin) being the reason they're considered Irish, regardless of the birth places of each band member. Likewise, other acts like

4064:

If you read between the lines, the wire source says the band is being "self-deprecating" - i.e., they were saying it with tongue firmly in cheek. Have you watched the video where the source took the quote from?

662:

a lot more and try to get some perspective when it comes to articles about bands. The article in its current state reads like something written by young and overzealous fans for some homemade zine or something.

3929:(original) thing, not a cheap fake like the ones Coldplay are making- no matter what some uninspired art historians will tell you. "The music has already been composed, it is the musician who discovers it." 6132:

unless there has been some recent news stating that all the members of Colplay have converted to Christianity, I don't think this is true. Do you have any references to any reliable sources stating this? -

1223:

Seriously, people, is there a source on this? I find it kind of insanely unlikely and I don't know why somebody put it there - some shocking joke? I'll remove it, and if a source can be found you can put it

4537:

Again, we use place of formation to classify the nationality of the band. Using a more familiar example, U2 is universally recognized as an Irish band, even though 2 band members are actually from England.

4226:

There is no blanket ban on linking to these sites as long as the links abide by the guidelines on this page (which would happen infrequently) ...Therefore, each instance of allowance is on a case-by-case

4783:'Post-Britpop Group'? I just want to know why Coldplay is not an 'Post-Britpop Group'.I will be happy if someone can show me some evidences which can tell me "Coldplay is not an Post-Britpop Group". 6072:

I think that due to the Christian themes in some of Coldplay's songs as well as the fact that all members are confessed Christians, the first sentence should read "Coldplay are a British alternative

810:

Coldplay are four sensitive souls - higher education and a pot noodle diet not too distant a memory - and clearly au-fait with the finer points of Jeff Buckley, Pink Floyd and, inevitably, Radiohead.

562:, I think you really are just being stubborn at this point and edit-warring just to try to get the last word, but you're doing so at the expense of the quality of the article's writing. My sentence: 221:), have nothing to do with the issue in question. What is at issue is whether the above paragraph belongs in the article, not the quality or otherwise of my possibly dubious personal musical tastes 4817:

when making an addition to Knowledge (XXG). Therefore, it's about proving your additions are true and referenced - not relying on other editors to prove your details are false or to add citations.

1066:

seem to show that the Coldplay name was not taken from Rice-Oxley and instead from Tim Crompton of Bettina Motive. That part of the article needs to be changed. Unless anyone can prove me wrong? --

5977:

The article states sales of 40m but I read the article cited as saying 30m, of which 10m were X&Y. I believe that the 40m figure double counts the X&Y sales. Anyone else read it that way?

5714:

Um, that's the correct spelling. The article uses British English spelling, thus not needing a change. Also, this article has been protected from new or unregistered users until March 10, 2009. --

1315:

states it's free use under Creative Commons, but it comes from a TV network's web site, and I doubt that this image is free to use (please, if I am wrong, feel free to correct me in this error).

1636:

Who is the smart alex who changed "Parachutes" to "FAGGOTS" and whatnot? You are only making a fool of yourself and it is not funny, if you think it is. Really, get the shit out of this article.

929:

to provide proper cited sources for it. I already made my contribution: I prefer to just jettison the entire paragraph, as I already did, or at least move it somewhere much lower in the article.

4628:

Using individual birthplace/citizenship as the primary indicator of a band's "nationality" can get very messy. For example, Oasis in all its incarnations is recognized as an English act. When

676:, comme calling out editors on this page as "young and overzealous fans". Feel free to create a To Do box or a list of suggestions if you feel that the article is a "homemade zine". Thanks. -- 238:

The information is not centered on the band, it belongs in an article about the hoaxter if anywhere. Only hoax's with very serious consequences/repurcussions have any real long-term notability

5860:

IMO it seems as if at least one of these other musicians has a pretty watertight case, but the world won't explode if we wait until the outcome of any cases before amending Coldplay's WP page

4005:, since there's no professional editorial screening for content. Youtube videos are not reliable sources either, since they can be uploaded by any user with no screening for verifiability or 2257:. The only other reference to Prospekt is just the word "Prospekt" at the end of the post, which could mean anything. It does not confirm without a doubt that the album title is "Prospekt". - 5386:

They emerged after the Britpop movement ended, so calling them Britpop is erroneous. Piano rock is frankly not a genre and I intend to nominate that article for deletion in the near future.

4827:

Post-Britpop simply refers to bands who started up after the Britpop movement. It's not an actual genre of music. The Melody Maker columnist in the BBC article summed it up best by saying

4683:

I semiprotected the page for 7 days asa rtesult of the edit warring and report at AN3. Nudge me on my talk if the dipsute ends before the 7 days are up and you need the article unprotected.

169:(ie, the paragraph, or the substance of the information contained therin, does not meet Knowledge (XXG) critera for inclusion and it is inappropriate for it to be included in this article) 2285:

Now it becomes evident why we regular editors continued to revert the hundreds of attempts to title the 4th album as "Prospekt". The Jan 30 website entry clearly states that "Prospekt" is

855:

Echo &The Bunnymen's Ian McCulloch also acted as consultant during the group's Liverpool recording sessions...His influence can be heard on such pop masterpieces as Clocks and Daylight

611:

Middle-class, earnest and smitten by the music of Radiohead and Jeff Buckley, they (Buckland and Martin) set out to write folk-rock songs that would measure up to the work of their heroes.

1178:

Put one good photo of the band, put a couple of Buckland and Martin and that's it. These posters about the "representation" of the band of their career aren't little more than hilarious.

5466:

Maybe "piano rock" isn't a "genre," but it does help further classify. I think it definitely applies to Coldplay, a very piano-centered band, and gives some description of their music.

435:

Well I've kind of left this article alone personally as I feel I have a vested interest, I thought it might he better if somebody else created the section if its felt it belongs here

2173:

The robot in the Talk video looks nothing like any incarnation of Marvin I've ever seen, and there's no source that says it's him and not some other robot. Where did this come from?

1973:

Excuse me for asking, but I search informations about a song called 'Us Against The World' from Coldplay. I couldn't find anything here but perhaps someone knows something about it.

3645:

Let's back track a bit. Right now, we have sources indicating the band's exclusive iTunes singles release. That's fine. However, none of these sources indicate that the deal is a

2159:

I hope nobody minds, but I went ahead an organized the sections so that it would be easier to see a timeline of Coldplay's career. I also put the discography under its own section.

141:(ie, the paragraph, or the substance of the information contained therin, meets Knowledge (XXG) critera for inclusion and it is appropriate for it to be included in this article) 6096:? Do you have any examples? Unless a band is typified by Christian lyrics, I am reluctant to call them a "Christian band." Personally, I don't think Coldplay fits the bill. — 3357:

Someone needs to remove the reference to "rumours" about Timbaland producing Vida La Vida. The source cited (note 33) merely mentions him in relation to a separate news story.

4820:

Knowledge (XXG) articles need third party reliable sources as citations. You can't use Knowledge (XXG) article A as a reference for Knowledge (XXG) article B. However, you

1861:

When speaking normally, would you honestly say "Coldplay are a band"? As an English speaker, I know for a fact that I wouldn't, and I'd be surprised to see someone say that.

1761:

playing great football." It should always be "Coldplay are". Further weight is given to this by phrases in the article like "they did" and "Coldplay have", and the fact that

5299:

AmE usages. The existence of these doesn't really prove anything other than that Knowledge (XXG) is edited by people with mutually inconsistent ideas about English usage.

2850:

has an exceptionally good musical style section, probably the best I've seen—musical sample analysis and everything. Something that great isn't a GA requirement, but having

6053:

I think we need a more reliable source that claims the mentioned "50 million sales". At this moment they don't have sold 50 million albums, but more than 40 million albums.

2842:

Hmm...well, interviews where the band talk about how they make music are always a good start. All Music Guide are generally good at talking about musical styles and stuff;

1131:

Could we have some discussion before making such drastic changes to the article? I just find it bizzare that images have been removed outright, when similar articles for

4763:

We've been through this many times, but the general opinion is that Coldplay is an "alternative rock" band. You can look up the talk page and article edit history... --

4467:

The band was formed in London, England, hence it being an English band. Knowledge (XXG) removed the "British" label in band articles and categories a long time ago. --

1715:: "You should be aware, however, that if you use you may be subject to criticism for doing so, and you may want to choose a safer synonym such as compose or make up." 3847:

reveresing my edit to Proper British based on the Knowledge (XXG) entry. I'm making it consistant though because even before I touched it the article went both ways.

1659:

There's no critic of the band, surely some of the negative press and the allergations of being boring should also be mentioned in order for it to be balanced article.

938:

why is it so important to you to devote so much time, space, and effort to Coldplay's influences, and why is it important enough to be so near the top of the article?

4340:

Oh I see what you are saying. Well there's nothing I can do to change the rules, I guess I'll just have to wait for corporate America to decide our truth for us :D --

4858:, we have to write conservatively about living, biographical subjects. When the Allmusic site is inconsistently tagging the group's genre, the course of action is 2350:

I have deleted 'The Nappies' section. I don't believe that it's really needed as it was already commented on in the 'X&Y' section. Feel free to appeal though.

192:. Namely, point 2 and 5 stating that articles should not contain "loosely associated topics" and "news reports" respectively. Also note the author's derogatory 1406:

I hate this layout of the box with the band members, escpecialy the flags. i like the layout as it was 18:56, 30 October 2006 much and much better anybody agree?

1014:

I mean Coldplay does use elements found in post-rock such as ambiently played guitars and atmospheric lyrics alongside piano-based play. Yes or no to post-rock?

1089:

Every song on the rush of blood album is incredibly sharp! does anyone know if there is a reason for this cause they do use a real piano in their recordings. --

2233:], the entry for Thursday December 6th, 2007 refers to the album name as Prospekt several times, including at the very end of the entry. This should be noted. 5063:

I'm sorry to post in the discussion board for something so minor, but I can't edit. It should be "Coldplay is a rock band," not "Coldplay are a rock band."

4554:

I don't have a problem with your compromise suggestion, but it was changed again just before the article was semi-protected. I'd technically be in breach of

5314:

American English, and I'm sorry if you were offended by our discussion. I didn't change the verbs, so no harm done. It was just an idea we were discussing.

1035:

I mean Coldplay does use elements found in britpop such as ambiently played guitars and atmospheric lyrics alongside piano-based play. Yes or no to britpop?

1795:

Personally I agree with Scjessey. In my view, if you refer to more than one person, it just sound more grammatically correct to say 'are' rather than 'is'.

123:. despite being an obvious hoax, the Labour Party's Media Monitoring Unit were concerned enough to circulate the story throughout "most of the government" 4540:

As a compromise, I've removed the nationality qualifier in the lead sentence; saying that the band was formed in London, England is already sufficient. --

589:. There's no need to threaten other users by calling them "stubborn" or resorting to remarks like "What point am I trying to prove, in your imagination" 4504:

tagged with ] for some time, even with the changes to the lead sentence. Regardless, it follows the mainstream media labeling the band as "Scottish". --

5678:. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out 1905: 1521: 1483: 5598:

Something should be mentioned about the current tour, they have now reached the UK and played in Sheffield last Saturday (29th November); I was there!

131:

Motion; The above paragraph, or the substance of the information contained therin, is appropriate for inclusion in the Knowledge (XXG) Coldplay article

4971:. Perhaps Crompton suggested it, Rice-Oxley took it and then dropped it and Martin nabbed it. The coldplay.com post does say that it was Crompton who 4071: 3957:

is not permitted, let alone linking to original research from an anonymous Youtube source. This claim has to be reported by reliable news sources. --

3842:

I wasted an hour on this and then ended up wrong. Instead of using google searches to prove a point which answers nothing you should have referenced

1311:

example) "at one point Martin had considered forming an *NSYNC-inspired boy band called Pectoralz" are completely unbelieveable without a reference.

2623:

A couple of prose/wording concerns, now that this is up for GA. (I know I'm sort of treating it like an FA, but GAs need to be "well written", too).

1480:

What's with the picture of 4 different Chris Martins? I found it kind of bizarre and unrepresentative. How about a picture with all 4 members in it?

5265: 5224: 4633:

of the entire group - a band's history begins with its formation, and hence it's place of formation should be used to identify its "nationality".

1878: 4854:

is cited as a Britpop artist in both the artist and Britpop pages) Therefore I've removed the mention of the genre from the infobox again. Per

4663:

No problem with that at all, as I indicated above. The problem arises with the assumption that anyone who is British is automatically English.

4246:

Sites which fail to meet criteria for reliable sources yet still contain information about the subject of the article from knowledgeable sources.

2040:

I see an anonymous editor has reverted my removal. Anybody have a reason this should be retained in the article? If not I'll remove it again. --

1503:

It does have all 4 members in it. Chris is singing, Jonny is playing electric guitar, Guy is playing acoustic guitar and Will is playing piano.

619:

The only reason why there's been multiple revisions to Citation 1 within the last 24 hours is simply to appease your standards. Again, I would

5185: 5675: 3488: 904:

card at the first available opportunity. Critiquing and playing devils' advocate is fine, but adding supporting evidence and information is

4123: 2022:

I wonder if anybody can make an encyclopedic case for retaining the small England flag in the infobox. I wonder what it adds to the link to

89:

As this paragraph is a source of dispute (see above), I feel consensus should be sought as to whether it should be included in the article;

6079: 4374: 4042: 3986: 3936: 3606: 3421: 3358: 1830: 1487: 5697: 4718: 3325: 5666:

Thank you for your suggestion. When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Knowledge (XXG) is a

5886: 5804: 5070: 4933: 4489: 3828: 3782: 3736: 3446: 2512: 2315: 2140: 2098: 1909: 1063: 5207:

be a plural verb, then you might as well say "the members of Coldplay..." instead of just "Coldplay". Because then, the verb refers to

3441:

now... but exclusively from iTunes, correct? So it is product endorsement.. the album as of now (may 27th) is not out yet. What's up??

6174: 6159: 5961: 4912: 4798: 4452: 3711: 3673: 3621: 3582: 3520: 3464: 2552: 2212: 1525: 1171:

and while they are around for about 6-7 years, both Radiohead and Oasis likewise have been around for twice longer about 13-14 years.

1021: 1460: 271:- as a hoax, it has absolutely no underlying substance in relation to Coldplay, and therefore shouldn't be in the Coldplay article. 5329:

In terms of the is/are dispute, its definately "Coldplay are". Being British i know this is a fact. Its written like this in BrE. --

5131: 4285:

More importantly though, I think we should move this discussion and effort to the actual article of the album instead of the band.--

3378: 1675: 4319:. So again, we can't use that YouTube video as the basis for another section on plagiarism - wait till the press does that first. 4126:) With the Creaky Boards plagiarism incident, it was mentioned on Knowledge (XXG) because of widespread reporting by the media - 1194:

nothing in a band's quality. And Painbearer, I¿m not telling you how do you look on your photo. It would be a personal attack...--

5269: 5228: 2722:

Image in Formation and first years (1996–1999) section didn't take place in that period (rather 2005) and isn't appropriate there

2638: 1882: 877: 148:(Reasons as stated above. Also declaring an interest in that I have instigated this poll, and am author of the text in question) 1453: 5689: 5679: 1939:

as the reason for this edit. I'm not sure about this one - I agree that it probably doesn't belong in the first sentence, but

5657: 5273: 5232: 1886: 630:

of its evolution over the past 3 albums. Note that such a format has also been adopted in the introduction to articles like

5786: 4028: 1334: 952:

on the part of editors who have contributed to this article. Instead of immediately disregarding their work, you can help

884: 5730: 5545: 5162: 4893: 3343: 3261: 3179: 3086: 3033: 2958: 2917: 2862: 2505:

This is not a fan page. Why are we deleting relevant information about how the band have been criticsed for being bland?

2483: 2433: 2123:

stronger national ties to the UK than they do to the US, so please avoid changing the article to use American English. —

1712: 4968: 1240: 5835: 4640:

It gets around the tricky "place of birth" issues raised by some editors, while focusing on the main details about the

4625:

all have different individual nationalities, but ultimately the band's nationality is based on its place of formation.

3141:"Plenty of sources"? I beg to differ. None of those appear to be reliable, also :/ I'll just remove quote; although, I 2111: 2091:

strikes the reader as bizarre. "Coldplay are an English rock band." Switching to British English seems unjustified...

1827: 6037: 5856:

Tstrobaugh, that link's dead: however, there is (currently) a clip of that Creaky Boards song (AND the one by Alizee)

5582: 5260: 5219: 5109: 1873: 850: 827: 3171:

Actually, the first hit is the book used for refs 11, 12, 43, and 44 (at the moment) and is a book. That's reliable.

658:

written and violates Knowledge (XXG) policies in more ways than one. You seriously need to cool down yourself, study

6006:

Thanks Dreamboy. Agreed, so until anyone comes up with a new sales reference I'm switching the sales figure to 30m.

900:

Again, I would recommend doing some research and follow up to the information presented, instead of pulling out the

895:

Drop Oasis if you like, but the fact is all three of these acts (and many others) have been influences for Coldplay.

121: 5335: 3025:

9; yes, that could be better. 10 and 48 are a newspaper and Amnesty International respectively—both are very good.

783: 38: 4323: 2133:

Hey guys I have a question--what is the bonus song #13 on X and Y refer to? What does it mean? It is moving....

120:, even going so far as to produce a fake song, "Talk to David", that could be downloaded via the Guardian website 5563: 3893: 3760: 1545:(first track on Parachutes), but I can't see it being referred to as "Beautiful World" anywhere in this article. 6108: 6083: 4671: 4566: 4527: 4378: 4046: 3990: 3940: 3492: 3337: 3255: 3173: 3080: 3027: 2952: 2937: 2911: 2856: 1834: 1741: 1290:

I'm sorry to have to fail this article, but it is not yet up to the quality of the average (or even lower-end)

5785:

I think the recent lawsuit brought against Coldplay for plagiarism by guitarist Joe Satriani should be added.

5471: 5350:

LJG, no offence(sic!) taken on my part: apologies if I expressed myself somewhat too testily on this point.

5319: 5289: 3610: 3425: 3362: 3220:

Archive link works for me. Also, I don't know how you were able to tell that the quote was from the book from

1491: 876:

In tribute to McCulloch's influence, the band regularly covered the Bunnymen hit "Lips Like Sugar" during the

5890: 5800: 4937: 4493: 3450: 3445:

Is the song being on iTunes being advertised in any way? No. As far as I can tell, it's just to sell albums.

2144: 2102: 1913: 1449:

You may not like the infobox, but that's the way it's going to stay. {{Infobox band}} has been superseded by

456:

this information simply be deleted at some point in the future to make way for less trivial information?). -

6178: 6058: 5957: 5074: 4916: 4794: 4456: 3832: 3786: 3755:

Why does each EP have the "EP" suffix at the end of its name? This is contrary to how AllMusic titles them.

3740: 3715: 3677: 3625: 3586: 3524: 3468: 3391: 2516: 2319: 2216: 1529: 925:

information that you seem determined to insert prominently near the top of the article, so the burden is on

795: 76: 71: 59: 6155: 6025: 5949: 5882: 5792: 5645: 5570: 5533: 5127: 5066: 4786: 4485: 4448: 4370: 4038: 3982: 3932: 3824: 3778: 3732: 3484: 3417: 3382: 2508: 2208: 2136: 2094: 1663: 1228: 1017: 1007: 495:

According to Martin, "We wouldn't be able to live with ourselves if we sold the songs' meanings like that."

6163: 5997: 5942:

Can we get a main picture change for them? I'd do it myself, though I lack knowledge of the requirements.

5257: 5216: 5105: 2184: 1870: 1866: 1025: 881: 520:

Does An advertisement for PBL or Newslimited "cheapen" coldplay any less than an ad for any other company?

5467: 5315: 5285: 2027: 1824: 1707:"Comprise" means consist of, encompass, be composed of, contain, etc. The whole comprises the parts (see 1393: 1090: 188:

on a hoax, where the band's "participation" was in name only, is not only excessive, but in violation of

5796: 5624: 5603: 5422: 5391: 5135: 5040: 3975: 2030:

is an essay which gives an interesting take on why using flags like this is unhelpful to our project. --

2002: 1802: 1787: 1671: 1637: 1149: 822: 721:

language, and do you really think that because someone on allmusic.com said their early recordings were

301: 5953: 5541: 5509:

piano rock listed as a genre on their infoboxes. I will now be adding it back in, thank you very much.

4790: 4714: 4577:"U2 is universally recognized as an Irish band, even though 2 band members are actually from England."' 4074:) and spinning it even further with an older out-of-context quote from a promo video for the new album. 1974: 1818: 1270:

on an old version of the official site says the album's release was blocked by the Chinese government.

5124:

they had written and recorded a track during the sessions for Viva la Vida named "Prospekt's March".

4581: 3581:

being very selective in its use for product endorsements." And then go on about what I wrote above? --

3113:(indent) - ok just 9 and 48 then, others seem fine, article is much healthier than it was a week ago. 2791:"to celebrate the birth of Apple" - needs ref for this being the reason (and generally...moar ref plz) 1817:

individuals, in which case it will be plural" So Coldplay is a band whereas Colplay are splitting up.

1753:

This is incorrect. British usage will always use the plural in cases like this. For example, "England

214:

NB. My personal opinions regarding Coldplay, posted as a comment on another users talk page (and thus

6140: 6033: 5993: 5843: 5825: 5284:

I concur... the verbs should refer to the band as a whole, because that is what the article is about.

5048: 5025: 4957: 4867: 4836: 4768: 4749: 4703: 4653: 4629: 4545: 4509: 4472: 4430: 4398: 4331: 4179: 4136: 4090: 4018: 3962: 3889: 3756: 3700: 3662: 3550: 3509: 3320:! If you found this review helpful, please consider helping out a fellow editor by reviewing another 2532: 2380: 2355: 2187:, but I agree that it's a bit of a stretch (especially without a source) and it should be removed. — 1107: 5685: 5510: 5437: 5256:

Plus, I see many cases where singular and plural are used "correctly". I won't say where, though. –

4201: 1944: 1608: 1410: 1219:

The album was banned in China after the Chinese government took the lyrics to "Spies" too seriously.

6098: 5857: 5817: 5725: 5514: 5490: 5441: 5192: 5181: 5157: 4888: 4851: 4713:

Why, because 'MTF' is so bright? I think it's just glow-in-the-dark tape; there are similar images

4665: 4560: 4521: 3848: 3843: 3810: 3289: 3238: 3159: 2986: 2933: 2890: 2829: 2681: 2604: 2570: 2478: 2428: 2262: 1542: 744: 124: 5537: 1689: 1685: 1067: 901: 718: 6054: 6011: 5982: 5865: 5653: 5020:

That can be embedded into the section where Phil is introduced in the band's early biography. --

4871: 4829:"Coldplay's success in the US has been, if anything, despite Oasis and Blur, not because of them" 4802: 3852: 3204: 3124: 3058: 3009: 2707:

1st sentence is a yucky four words...please expand (possibly include formation date/place in it?)

2650: 2294: 1692:

the article as you just did is counter-productive and extremely unhelpful. Please don't do it. —

1045: 989: 939: 758: 748: 726: 687: 664: 643: 572: 101: 6029: 5574: 5483: 4699: 4078: 3329: 1295: 1148:

I readded the old Coldplay image as no other fair use image could accurately depict the members.

5249:

Coldplay (as a whole) is an alternative rock band formed in London, England on 16 January 1998.

756:

Jeff Buckley, Travis, and Radiohead have all been regularly cited as a template for Coldplay's

564:"Coldplay's early material has been compared by some reviewers to artists such as Jeff Buckley" 6195: 5693: 5456: 5408: 5376: 5090: 4984: 4948:

1997, but I can't find it online anymore.... so let's just leave that off the article until a

4722: 3400: 2946:

The images in the X&Y (2004–2006) section also need to be re-arranged (or removed...) per

2629:

The Rush of Blood to the Head tour showed the band's progression into a bona fide stadium act.

2276: 2238: 2188: 2124: 1992: 1948: 1693: 1646: 1623: 1569: 1546: 1504: 1276: 1256: 536: 436: 379: 341: 222: 145: 4031: 4006: 3802: 3688: 3650: 3542: 1940: 1936: 1116:

Please don't redir to a disambig page, when it can be redir to the actual article. thanks. --

860: 582: 184:, etc.) only garner one sentence references in the main article. The inclusion of an entire 118: 5620: 5599: 5506: 5493: 5418: 5387: 5005: 3874: 1796: 1667: 1565: 1255:(Incidentally, please remember to sign your comments by typing four tildes (~~~~). Thanks!) 1236: 975: 396: 325: 279: 259: 197: 5743: 4976: 4855: 4847: 4555: 4393:

just like the recent (disproved) Creaky Boards allegations. It's that simple. Cheers. --

4082: 4010: 3954: 3692: 3654: 3538: 3321: 3313: 2947: 2846:

too. I also use reviews from others, but those tend to be the best for this sort of thing.

1319: 1271: 1106:

should really be linked straight to the article. Meanwhile I have fixed a double redirect.

949: 771: 673: 620: 586: 297: 193: 189: 6134: 5839: 5821: 5764: 5750: 5705: 5578: 5496: 5086: 5044: 5021: 5009: 4953: 4863: 4832: 4764: 4745: 4742:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:External_links#.22Official_Myspace.22_Links_on_Wiki

4649: 4614: 4541: 4505: 4468: 4426: 4415: 4394: 4345: 4327: 4290: 4175: 4161: 4132: 4109: 4086: 4014: 3958: 3912: 3696: 3658: 3546: 3505: 2998:

Could you change current refs 9,10 and 48 please. There are much stronger ones available.

2847: 2528: 2454: 2376: 2351: 1988: 1929: 1437: 1428:

I have no problem with the box as it currently stands. The flag is fine (not particularly

1371: 1357: 1347: 1338: 1323: 1183: 1140: 1117: 1076: 1075:

Dunno, Rolling Stone says that the name comes from a collection of poems by Philip Horky.

1059: 957: 910: 677: 647: 407: 366: 352: 293: 201: 177: 5035: 4949: 4814: 4737: 4390: 4304: 4300: 4205: 4171: 4119: 4058: 4002: 3534: 3317: 2548: 2396: 1291: 659: 100:

journalist "Olaf Priol" claimed that Chris Martin had decided to publicly support the UK

4029:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/eonline/20080617/en_celeb_eo/55de2ab210a7_4129_9c57_43ebab81fda8

2786:"reminiscent of U2's recent Elevation tour." - rmv italics, add ref for comparison to U2 2757:

Music samples in A Rush of Blood to the Head (2001–2004) section need descriptions (see

603:

ion your talk page, ndicating Buckley's influence on the band's music on your talk page:

5921: 5716: 5355: 5304: 5148: 4911:

Their official myspace states "we have been a band since january 16th 1998" not 1997.

4879: 3806: 3798: 3560: 3276: 3225: 3146: 2973: 2877: 2816: 2668: 2591: 2557: 2469: 2419: 2335: 2258: 1464: 505: 472: 157: 112: 5742:

I shall go and correct it then as it is the incorrect spelling even in British English

4810: 3504:

Show or Jonathan Ross, they'd be promoting the talk show and not their song/album? --

2932:

I think it should also be noted that several paragraphs are still completely uncited.

1821: 599: 239: 6007: 5978: 5861: 5649: 5001: 4877:

What about "Piano rock", since its mentioned in the genre category in the article. --

3194: 3114: 3048: 2999: 2643: 2586: 2290: 2055: 1959: 1778: 1745: 1731: 1716: 1207:

Blah blah blah what a load of rubbish. Coldplay is not better than Oasis or Radiohead

243: 105: 47: 17: 5139: 4741: 2271:

When the band themselves reference the album as Prospekt, it isn't credible? Weird.

1622:

nitpicks and rving vandalism, so I don't think I'm the best candidate for the job.

1267: 5500: 5452: 5404: 5372: 4684: 4618: 4445:

How are Coldplay an English band when at least one of its members is not English?

3396: 2272: 2234: 1828:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/youmeus/learnit/learnitv163.shtml

1774: 1770: 1766: 1419: 1195: 1136: 635: 566:

is literally true, yet you insist on replacing it with the vaguer and less factual

361: 97: 152: 5641:

Can someone fix the spelling error of "collaberated" (it should be collaborated)?

4326:

for why we don't allow self-created material like YouTube videos as sources. --

3866: 1708: 1337:, which has been listed within the References section for almost 2 years now. -- 1294:. Follows are the problems I have found, according to the guidelines laid out at 624:

over the past 36 hours, simply to touch up information left out by other editors.

5015: 4645: 3870: 2758: 2174: 1984: 1232: 967: 736: 723:"heart-rending like Travis, passionate like Jeff Buckley, and as fresh as Oasis" 639: 457: 389: 313: 272: 255: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

4980: 4930: 4846:

While Allmusic's Coldplay article is tagged with a "Britpop" label, the actual

3559:

Alright, here's a source from Music Week: "Coldplay iTunes ad debuts on US TV"

2781:"Parachutes was released in November 2000" - released in NA. in 2000, you mean? 5760: 5746: 5701: 5564:

http://www.nme.com/photos/631/10/this-week-s-news-in-pictures-22-november-2008

5529:

Coldplay Performed Viva la Vida on Saturday Night Live on October 25th' 2008

5400: 4610: 4411: 4341: 4286: 4157: 4105: 3925: 3908: 3460: 3221: 2801:"as the first single from Viva la Vida" - no need to name the album again here 2446: 2401: 2160: 1765:

were originally called "The Coldplay". Other similar examples can be found in

1645:

I love how a recent vandalism didn't even get the right band. Fools indeed.

1370:

GA or FA on a band (or, really, anything) and see if that's how it's done. --

559: 115: 109: 1436:), and I like that the "labels" section no longer takes up so many lines. -- 777: 374:

Well I do take your point Madchester, but part of the hoax was that the band

6182: 6167: 6146: 6122: 6087: 6062: 6041: 6015: 6001: 5986: 5965: 5932: 5909: 5894: 5869: 5847: 5829: 5808: 5768: 5754: 5737: 5709: 5628: 5607: 5586: 5549: 5518: 5503: 5475: 5460: 5445: 5426: 5412: 5395: 5380: 5359: 5351: 5343: 5323: 5308: 5300: 5293: 5278: 5237: 5203:

I believe we should change all of them to singular verbs. If you feel there

5189: 5169: 5113: 5093: 5078: 5052: 5029: 4987: 4961: 4941: 4920: 4900: 4840: 4772: 4753: 4725: 4707: 4687: 4676: 4657: 4571: 4549: 4532: 4513: 4497: 4476: 4460: 4434: 4419: 4402: 4382: 4349: 4335: 4294: 4183: 4165: 4140: 4113: 4094: 4050: 4022: 3994: 3966: 3944: 3916: 3897: 3878: 3856: 3836: 3814: 3790: 3764: 3744: 3719: 3704: 3681: 3666: 3629: 3614: 3590: 3554: 3528: 3513: 3496: 3472: 3454: 3429: 3404: 3386: 3366: 3352: 3296: 3270: 3245: 3215: 3188: 3166: 3135: 3095: 3069: 3042: 3020: 2993: 2967: 2941: 2926: 2897: 2871: 2837: 2689: 2657: 2612: 2578: 2536: 2520: 2490: 2462: 2440: 2407: 2384: 2359: 2339: 2331: 2323: 2298: 2280: 2266: 2242: 2220: 2191: 2177: 2163: 2148: 2127: 2075: 2072: 2071:

An invisible comment would be easier. Clearly it should be in UK English. --

2058: 2044: 2041: 2034: 2031: 2005: 1995: 1977: 1962: 1951: 1917: 1891: 1838: 1804: 1790: 1781: 1748: 1734: 1719: 1696: 1649: 1640: 1626: 1611: 1596: 1593: 1572: 1559: 1556: 1549: 1533: 1507: 1495: 1467: 1440: 1422: 1413: 1396: 1374: 1360: 1350: 1341: 1326: 1279: 1259: 1198: 1186: 1152: 1143: 1132: 1120: 1110: 1093: 1079: 1070: 1048: 1029: 992: 982: 960: 942: 913: 740: 729: 690: 680: 667: 650: 631: 575: 539: 508: 475: 460: 439: 410: 401: 382: 369: 355: 344: 328: 316: 304: 284: 263: 246: 225: 204: 160: 2747:"The multi-talented Champion" - claim needs source (sound POVish otherwise) 298:

WP:NOT - Knowledge (XXG) is not an indiscriminate collection of information

190:

WP:NOT - Knowledge (XXG) is not an indiscriminate collection of information

2399:

status? If so, I will nominate this article. Please voice your opinions.--

800:

the influence can even be pinned to a single song: Jeff Buckley's "Grace".

5879:

Hall of residence where coldplay where supposed to have met and lived.

5487: 2666:

Done and done. Feel free to clean up if you feel it is still inadequate.

1266:

Hmm, I'm having trouble finding a definitive answer/source for this one.

1058:

The second post on this page of the official Keane forums by ChrisFlynn:

5619:, it is mentioned already in the Viva La Vida (2006-Present) section. -- 4778:

Why Knowledge (XXG) does not regard Coldplay as an 'Post-Britpop Group'?

4638:

Coldplay are an alternative rock band formed in London, England in 1997.

2547:

I strongly doubt that Coldplaying.com, a popular Coldplay website, is a

1844:

singular. Not plural. I think it's ridiculous that this dispute exists.

568:"Coldplay's early material was influenced by the likes of Jeff Buckley." 504:

Yes, but is it in advertisement for anything but the channel itself? --

5482:

throughout. Plus, Knowledge (XXG) has a pretty decent sized article on

4389:

If this Youtube plagiarism claim is notable, then it'll be reported by

2023: 1103: 312:— I really believe there is better material about Coldplay to discuss. 176:. Some of Coldplay's more important projects from the past few years ( 5085:

This has been discussed a few times before. The article is written in

1825:

http://www.onestopenglish.com/section.asp?catid=59612&docid=152820

840: 789: 3976:

http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2005/07/04/coldplay-admits-plagiarism/

3869:

pretty much speaks for itself. They even stole the name of the song.

714: 218:

in breach of wiki POV policy) (and also above, see Kraftwerk section

181: 5759:

Hmm, no I won't as you've already removed it with your last edit. --

4698:

the photo for: "make trade fair" under activism is clearly doctored

3797:

The construction in question is grammatical in British English. See

2011: 1819:

http://www.learnenglish.org.uk/grammar/archive/collective_nouns.html

845:

sucking up new influences - from Echo And The Bunnymen to Pink Floyd

5834:

But nothing about the previous accusation about the same song from

4307:

are two different policies. The former states that external links

6152:

Lol you have it all wrong. Coldplay are as atheist as they come.

5557:

Chris Martin has suggested splitting up the band at the end of 09.

4850:

article has no mention of the band whatsoever. (On the other hand

2054:

encouraged in infoboxes when indicating origin or nationality. --

1459:

and all instances of the {{Infobox band}} are to be replaced. See

5674:

link at the top. The Knowledge (XXG) community encourages you to

4824:

use share third party reliable sources across many Wiki articles.

3459:

Yes it is, watch this 30-second YouTube video of the commercial;

1935:

the phrase "critically acclaimed" from the lead sentence, citing

5670:, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the 5667: 5193:

http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=11:gzfwxqrkld6e

4622: 2752:"the name was "too depressing"." - this statement needs a source 2527:

Please don't use make test/vandal edits on articles. Thanks. --

4001:

The PlagarismToday site is a blog. It cannot be accepted as a

3649:

in the band's advertising philosophy. You're currently adding

2501:

Why has genuine, referenced critisism of the band been removed?

2445:

Yeah, I just noticed that a few days ago. Let's all continue.--

219: 1346:

Then, very simply, why not just put in an inline citation? --

25: 4604:

biographic details when they should simply be looking at the

3710:

availability on Apple's iTunes music downloading service." --

5417:

They shouldn't be labeled Britpop in their article, either.

3729:

Do you know how I know you're gay? You listen to Coldplay.

2205:

Everyday, I visit this page to find new unverified claims.

6196:

http://http://www.musicweek.com/story.asp?storycode=1034284

4736:

One Myspace Official link may be added, as a result of the

4170:

You can discuss the use of Youtube in the talk section for

3537:

to add that to the section. Knowledge (XXG) doesn't allow

94: 5436:"Piano rock" is a ridiculous term, I'm glad it's deleted. 4032:

http://eonline.mlogic.mobi/detail.jsp?key=281529&rc=ne

2253:, either way it doesn't confirm that the album's title is 1757:

playing great football" would be used instead of "England

4367:

most imperious Coldplay fanboy wont be able to deny it.

2806:

Political and social activism section needs more sourcing

365:

when they should have been restricted to CM's article. --

3414:

CM walked out of an interview. Why? It should be here.

2742:

Guy Berryman") in/ that section...try and copyedit a bit

4975:

suggested it, not that he gave it to the band (I know,

4066: 3974:

Coldplay has admitted to Plagiarism. The link is here:

1933: 1318:

Best of luck, and feel free to resubmit the article to

735:

Umm, if you do some further research, you'll see that "

590: 4558:

if I were to revert the changes of that editor again.

1163:

more charming. Just some good pic with shaved Martin.

6173:

Personally, I wouldn't call them alternative rock. -

2642:

to provide a brief explanation of the time scheme. --

3561:

http://www.musicweek.com/story.asp?storycode=1034284

2702:

First of all; Coldplay rocks. Now for the review...

921:

it isn't up to me to do your research for you. It's

880:. A live version also makes it way as a B-side to " 200:) claiming that Coldplay "as dull as dish water". -- 5371:referred to as britpop) should be added. Thoughts? 2776:

More refs needed for awards won and stuff like that

2727:

Same with (kickass) "Yellow" image a bit further on

2202:Rumors on the new album need to stop on the page. 1822:

http://www.perfectyourenglish.com/grammar/nouns.htm

956:

their writing by finding any supporting details. --

5566:I can't add anything because the page is locked. 3324:. Help and advice on how to do so is available at 3275:Aussies and their more accurate search results :) 3145:include an archive.org link for the Amnesty ref. 861:PopMatters: Coldplay - A Rush of Blood to the Head 551:anyone knows the right links, please attach them. 531:I guess this is a hoax at genre: "Death Metal"(?) 784:Canoe.ca: Jam Shobiz - Coldplay Parachutes review 4813:, it is the responsibility of an editor to cite 3193:I couldnt get the archive to work either, doh!! 2796:"went on their Twisted Logic tour" - rmv italics 2766:"placed at a modest #35" - which chart, and ref? 1476:Picture? How about one with all 4 members in it? 851:Canoe: Jam-Showbiz - A Rush of Blood to the Head 4057:Again, Youtube videos are not permissible as 1902:reluctantly confirmed it. So whats the deal? 292:- I agree with points made above, especially 8: 4983:, if you're reading, could you clarify..? — 4931:http://www.coldplay.com/newsdetail.php?id=80 3770:Severe grammatical errors throughout artical 1568:, as well as the promotional "Acoustic" EP. 360:There's already a 1 sentence mention in the 3436:Coldplay on iTunes//Activism (merge topics) 841:NME: Coldplay - A Rush of Blood to the Head 5014:"Coldplay consider long-time collaborator 3926:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ofFw9DKu_I 3461:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3mYc1m3lsM 2114:. In short, we aim for consistency within 1463:. Do not change it back to the old box. - 1139:have retained their photos and posters. -- 5451:Then how do we define piano-driven rock? 4124:essay section on Reliable source examples 2227:Confirmed: Prospekt is the new album name 5816:This is already presented in detail in " 3844:American and British English differences 3821:good fight though, for free of course! 3328:, and you can ask for the help of a GAN 3224:, but anyways, it is, so I'll use that. 2543:Coldplaying.com is not a reliable source 351:trivial information deserves mention. -- 108:due to his disillusionment with current 6187: 5039:so that it doesn't bubble into another 3326:Knowledge (XXG):Reviewing good articles 2417:of work, before it can be nominated. -- 1854:Coldplay is/are made up of many people. 597:Second, I also posted a quote from the 296:'s opinion that it is "in violation of 254:. "Loosely associated topics" indeed.— 85:Seeking consensus re disputed paragraph 4636:Again, I suggest a lead sentence like: 3541:or allow editors can insert their own 2712:"X&Y (2005) met with a" - rmv with 581:Again, I recommend that you keep your 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 4309:are not citations of article sources. 2909:Leave me a note when done... cheers, 2734:A fair bit of wordiness ("lineup was 1461:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Musicians 7: 4862:to include in in Knowledge (XXG). -- 4600:People here are too wrapped up with 2395:Should this article be nominated to 2010:I think what you're looking for is " 1851:Coldplay play/plays at large venues. 774:(Buckley, Thom Yorke (of Radiohead)) 5690:New contributors are always welcome 5403:emerged after Britpop, yet still... 4118:Again Youtube is not accepted as a 3250:Aaah, no, the first hit for me was 3078:of sources for that quote, though. 2112:this section of the Manual of Style 5698:many reasons why you might want to 5012:first album tour. Something like 4777: 2627:I don't quite like this sentence: 1322:when these problems are fixed. -- 1127:Recent overhaul, removal of images 796:Pitchfork Media: Parachutes review 739:" was based on the main riff from 24: 6076:rock band", I bolded the change. 5688:to try out your editing skills. 2185:the Marvin from the BBC TV series 2105:) 23:32:08, August 18, 2007 (UTC) 1983:Seems to be a cover of a song by 1607:and their future fourth release. 1062:and this post by Tim Rice-Oxley: 988:to argue about this any further. 965:Well said Madchester. Testify! 790:NME: Coldplay - Parachutes review 5104:Im goin to say great article. -- 5018:as a fifth member of the group." 4744:Please feel free to add it back! 4268:than the Creaky Boards incident. 3775:It is quite painful to read. 3410:Front Row, BBC Radio 4 June 2008 2639:A Rush of Blood to the Head Tour 1167:a consistent ant tight line-up. 878:A Rush of Blood to the Head Tour 29: 1632:Please do not harm this article 778:Ink Blot: Coldplay - Parachutes 5461:16:11, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 5446:02:05, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 5427:20:57, 17 September 2008 (UTC) 5413:18:18, 17 September 2008 (UTC) 5396:11:24, 17 September 2008 (UTC) 5381:18:42, 15 September 2008 (UTC) 5279:11:24, 14 September 2008 (UTC) 5244:body as a whole. For example: 5238:11:05, 14 September 2008 (UTC) 5190:18:03, 27 September 2008 (UTC) 4311:YouTube videos are allowed as 3316:has passed, and this is now a 3253:. Probably depends on region. 2183:I guess it looks kind of like 2149:03:40, 27 September 2007 (UTC) 2128:22:59, 18 September 2007 (UTC) 1969:Searching a song from Coldplay 1892:10:58, 14 September 2008 (UTC) 1518:That song isn't on any record 1356:reference from that source. -- 717:sentence because it contained 1: 6183:13:38, 23 December 2008 (UTC) 6168:22:01, 18 February 2009 (UTC) 6123:03:01, 22 December 2008 (UTC) 6088:02:55, 22 December 2008 (UTC) 6063:20:22, 17 February 2009 (UTC) 5987:17:02, 30 November 2008 (UTC) 5895:00:17, 28 December 2008 (UTC) 5769:19:57, 11 December 2008 (UTC) 5755:19:54, 11 December 2008 (UTC) 5738:19:42, 11 December 2008 (UTC) 5710:15:24, 11 December 2008 (UTC) 5615:If you are talking about the 5587:22:55, 23 November 2008 (UTC) 5170:22:18, 7 September 2008 (UTC) 5140:18:41, 3 September 2008 (UTC) 5114:11:42, 1 September 2008 (UTC) 2281:01:14, 17 December 2007 (UTC) 2267:07:23, 15 December 2007 (UTC) 2243:05:43, 15 December 2007 (UTC) 1839:14:52, 12 February 2008 (UTC) 1791:05:24, 2 September 2007 (UTC) 1697:12:04, 16 February 2007 (UTC) 1650:20:09, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 1468:02:21, 28 December 2006 (UTC) 1441:22:14, 12 December 2006 (UTC) 1423:00:44, 12 December 2006 (UTC) 1397:16:54, 30 November 2006 (UTC) 1375:22:19, 16 November 2006 (UTC) 1361:18:21, 16 November 2006 (UTC) 1351:14:21, 16 November 2006 (UTC) 1342:08:16, 16 November 2006 (UTC) 1327:23:15, 15 November 2006 (UTC) 1153:23:05, 26 December 2006 (UTC) 1080:09:40, 15 November 2006 (UTC) 1049:15:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC) 885:DVD single (see tracklisting) 6194:Ashton, Robert (2008-5-21). 6147:22:50, 10 January 2009 (UTC) 6042:17:56, 28 January 2009 (UTC) 6016:20:27, 25 January 2009 (UTC) 5966:15:51, 24 January 2009 (UTC) 5933:11:19, 22 January 2009 (UTC) 5848:13:58, 7 December 2008 (UTC) 5830:22:02, 5 December 2008 (UTC) 5809:21:39, 5 December 2008 (UTC) 5629:22:26, 4 December 2008 (UTC) 5608:16:37, 4 December 2008 (UTC) 5550:23:11, 26 October 2008 (UTC) 5519:03:41, 23 October 2008 (UTC) 5476:22:28, 12 October 2008 (UTC) 5360:03:22, 19 October 2008 (UTC) 5344:01:55, 19 October 2008 (UTC) 5324:00:56, 19 October 2008 (UTC) 5309:21:38, 14 October 2008 (UTC) 5294:22:21, 12 October 2008 (UTC) 2385:01:38, 26 January 2008 (UTC) 2360:10:09, 23 January 2008 (UTC) 2340:22:24, 17 January 2008 (UTC) 2324:22:20, 17 January 2008 (UTC) 2299:21:05, 1 February 2008 (UTC) 2221:01:41, 29 October 2007 (UTC) 2192:23:08, 21 October 2007 (UTC) 2178:15:48, 21 October 2007 (UTC) 1958:an appropriate citation. -- 1805:06:37, 30 January 2008 (UTC) 1641:09:39, 7 February 2007 (UTC) 1627:02:39, 3 February 2007 (UTC) 1612:20:56, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 1597:23:33, 22 January 2007 (UTC) 1573:23:37, 22 January 2007 (UTC) 1560:23:33, 22 January 2007 (UTC) 1550:10:22, 22 January 2007 (UTC) 1534:04:36, 22 January 2007 (UTC) 1508:11:58, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 1496:08:03, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 1414:16:55, 5 December 2006 (UTC) 1280:16:13, 4 November 2006 (UTC) 1260:15:56, 4 November 2006 (UTC) 1199:00:11, 2 November 2006 (UTC) 1054:Origins of the Coldplay name 1030:12:23, 10 October 2007 (UTC) 792:(Buckley, Travis, Radiohead) 535:Yes, I've reverted the edit 256:Ëzhiki (ërinacëus amurënsis) 196:comments towards the band, ( 151:Though admitedly, I do have 135:Please add your vote below; 6002:21:54, 1 January 2009 (UTC) 5870:10:37, 2 January 2009 (UTC) 5094:15:37, 13 August 2008 (UTC) 5079:10:47, 13 August 2008 (UTC) 4921:22:17, 12 August 2008 (UTC) 2365:"the American actress" edit 2164:20:32, 7 October 2007 (UTC) 2076:01:06, 14 August 2007 (UTC) 2059:23:16, 13 August 2007 (UTC) 2045:20:40, 13 August 2007 (UTC) 2001:Thanks, helped me a lot :) 1782:23:41, 18 August 2007 (UTC) 1688:then yeah, maybe. However, 1286:GA failure on Nov. 15, 2006 1187:22:14, 20 August 2006 (UTC) 1144:21:46, 20 August 2006 (UTC) 828:A Rush of Blood to the Head 672:Again, there's no need for 6215: 6068:Coldplay is Christian Rock 4967:using it'". The article's 4077:I'd suggest reading up on 2810:No musical style section? 2690:17:16, 25 April 2008 (UTC) 2658:12:52, 25 April 2008 (UTC) 2613:01:38, 25 April 2008 (UTC) 2579:01:35, 25 April 2008 (UTC) 2537:05:31, 23 April 2008 (UTC) 2521:17:19, 22 April 2008 (UTC) 2491:02:18, 20 April 2008 (UTC) 2463:02:16, 20 April 2008 (UTC) 2441:01:59, 20 April 2008 (UTC) 2408:15:51, 12 April 2008 (UTC) 2035:22:24, 2 August 2007 (UTC) 1918:05:21, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 1749:11:49, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 1735:01:03, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 1272:This listing for the album 1121:18:39, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 1111:18:31, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 1094:06:30, 2 August 2006 (UTC) 772:CMJ - COLDPLAY: Parachutes 476:19:23, 26 April 2006 (UTC) 402:18:47, 20 April 2006 (UTC) 383:17:02, 14 April 2006 (UTC) 370:16:59, 14 April 2006 (UTC) 356:16:08, 14 April 2006 (UTC) 345:10:37, 14 April 2006 (UTC) 285:18:44, 20 April 2006 (UTC) 264:18:39, 20 April 2006 (UTC) 247:05:06, 17 April 2006 (UTC) 226:18:38, 13 April 2006 (UTC) 205:01:27, 13 April 2006 (UTC) 5692:. You don't even need to 5676:be bold in updating pages 5660:) 14:53, 11 December 2008 5053:22:50, 25 July 2008 (UTC) 5030:22:41, 25 July 2008 (UTC) 4988:20:58, 25 July 2008 (UTC) 4962:20:39, 25 July 2008 (UTC) 4942:19:00, 25 July 2008 (UTC) 4901:16:42, 25 July 2008 (UTC) 4872:13:49, 25 July 2008 (UTC) 4841:05:02, 24 July 2008 (UTC) 4803:04:39, 24 July 2008 (UTC) 4773:03:00, 23 July 2008 (UTC) 4754:00:45, 15 July 2008 (UTC) 4726:12:35, 10 July 2008 (UTC) 4708:01:57, 10 July 2008 (UTC) 4688:21:17, 24 June 2008 (UTC) 4677:16:17, 25 June 2008 (UTC) 4658:16:02, 25 June 2008 (UTC) 4584:14:45, 25 June 2008 (UTC) 4572:07:59, 25 June 2008 (UTC) 4550:17:58, 24 June 2008 (UTC) 4533:16:36, 24 June 2008 (UTC) 4514:12:48, 24 June 2008 (UTC) 4498:05:51, 24 June 2008 (UTC) 4477:23:10, 22 June 2008 (UTC) 4461:07:16, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 4435:18:58, 22 June 2008 (UTC) 4420:18:51, 22 June 2008 (UTC) 4403:21:31, 21 June 2008 (UTC) 4383:21:26, 21 June 2008 (UTC) 4350:09:24, 23 June 2008 (UTC) 4336:23:56, 22 June 2008 (UTC) 4295:23:23, 22 June 2008 (UTC) 4184:20:26, 22 June 2008 (UTC) 4166:19:26, 22 June 2008 (UTC) 4141:18:53, 22 June 2008 (UTC) 4114:18:35, 22 June 2008 (UTC) 4095:12:16, 21 June 2008 (UTC) 4051:06:45, 21 June 2008 (UTC) 4023:04:13, 21 June 2008 (UTC) 3995:02:51, 21 June 2008 (UTC) 3967:18:52, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 3945:04:56, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 3917:07:47, 19 June 2008 (UTC) 3898:13:01, 18 June 2008 (UTC) 3879:05:02, 18 June 2008 (UTC) 3862:Allegations of plagiarism 3857:16:01, 25 June 2008 (UTC) 3837:23:37, 12 June 2008 (UTC) 3815:18:22, 12 June 2008 (UTC) 3791:00:12, 12 June 2008 (UTC) 3765:14:01, 16 June 2008 (UTC) 3745:05:40, 18 June 2008 (UTC) 3720:12:36, 12 June 2008 (UTC) 3705:21:32, 10 June 2008 (UTC) 3682:20:48, 10 June 2008 (UTC) 3430:14:49, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 3405:13:55, 14 June 2008 (UTC) 3372:Viva la Vida Release Date 3367:15:53, 10 June 2008 (UTC) 2771:Ref 9; no italics for CNN 2006:21:32, 18 June 2007 (UTC) 1996:15:28, 18 June 2007 (UTC) 1978:23:17, 12 June 2007 (UTC) 1773:, and similar bands like 1720:19:03, 9 March 2007 (UTC) 1071:17:15, 29 June 2006 (UTC) 993:01:32, 23 June 2006 (UTC) 983:22:16, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 961:21:15, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 943:19:50, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 914:19:20, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 730:17:01, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 691:07:21, 24 June 2006 (UTC) 681:07:05, 24 June 2006 (UTC) 668:07:00, 24 June 2006 (UTC) 651:06:14, 24 June 2006 (UTC) 576:05:52, 24 June 2006 (UTC) 509:09:07, 11 June 2006 (UTC) 198:User_talk:Elkman#Coldplay 6198:. Retrieved on 2008-6-4. 5875:Ramsay Hall of Residence 4950:reliable source is found 4926:Please edit the article! 3667:23:48, 9 June 2008 (UTC) 3630:23:05, 9 June 2008 (UTC) 3615:11:02, 9 June 2008 (UTC) 3591:07:07, 4 June 2008 (UTC) 3555:05:13, 4 June 2008 (UTC) 3529:03:49, 4 June 2008 (UTC) 3514:02:20, 31 May 2008 (UTC) 3497:00:19, 31 May 2008 (UTC) 3473:03:32, 4 June 2008 (UTC) 3455:05:32, 2 June 2008 (UTC) 3387:21:45, 4 June 2008 (UTC) 2413:Nope, the article needs 1963:11:46, 5 June 2007 (UTC) 1952:11:39, 5 June 2007 (UTC) 1742:English collective nouns 592:to belittle other users. 461:01:53, 26 May 2006 (UTC) 406:So what happened to it? 329:00:11, 18 May 2006 (UTC) 317:09:39, 13 May 2006 (UTC) 305:01:10, 12 May 2006 (UTC) 5901:Query over endorsements 5199:Is or Are dispute again 5146:Link has been fixed. -- 4648:use a similar format.-- 4007:a neutral point of view 3353:08:57, 6 May 2008 (UTC) 3322:good article nomination 3297:03:09, 3 May 2008 (UTC) 3271:03:03, 3 May 2008 (UTC) 3246:03:00, 3 May 2008 (UTC) 3216:02:59, 3 May 2008 (UTC) 3189:02:57, 3 May 2008 (UTC) 3167:02:54, 3 May 2008 (UTC) 3136:02:46, 3 May 2008 (UTC) 3096:02:44, 3 May 2008 (UTC) 3070:02:41, 3 May 2008 (UTC) 3043:02:39, 3 May 2008 (UTC) 3021:02:37, 3 May 2008 (UTC) 2994:01:37, 3 May 2008 (UTC) 2968:01:29, 3 May 2008 (UTC) 2942:16:25, 2 May 2008 (UTC) 2927:10:49, 1 May 2008 (UTC) 2898:07:36, 6 May 2008 (UTC) 2872:00:09, 2 May 2008 (UTC) 2838:18:12, 1 May 2008 (UTC) 2231:On Coldplay's website, 1857:Coldplay is/are a band. 1387:Songs in advertisements 1296:What is a good article? 600:Wisconsin State Journal 540:13:21, 7 May 2006 (UTC) 440:16:58, 9 May 2006 (UTC) 411:21:41, 5 May 2006 (UTC) 161:17:56, 5 May 2006 (UTC) 5089:. 'Are' is correct. — 4644:. Many articles like 3392:Piano Rock and Britpop 3047:48 didnt work for me? 2026:that we already have. 1925:"Critically acclaimed" 1590:concret footage airing 1454:Infobox musical artist 353:The Human Spellchecker 5118: 5041:Seigenthaler incident 5004:being referred to as 4732:Official Myspace Link 3924:Take a look at this- 2467:I was just sayin'. -- 2097:comment was added by 2012:How You See the World 1987:. I would guess it's 1908:comment was added by 1897:Timbaland/Swizz Beatz 1524:comment was added by 1486:comment was added by 1008:Post-rock and britpop 823:Echo and the Bunnymen 42:of past discussions. 5906:supporting charity? 5696:(although there are 5213:the group (Coldplay) 3543:commentary or claims 2814:look at the artist. 2553:Google News Archives 2391:Good Article Status? 2289:the album title. -- 1786:I agree with Chris. 1602:New Singles Box Set? 1158:To make myself clear 747:" during its recent 466:Removed two sections 93:On April 1 2006 the 6136:И i m b u s a n i a 5818:Viva la Vida (song) 5525:Saturday Night Live 5176:coldplay is Britpop 4441:english not british 3651:personal commentary 3338:dihydrogen monoxide 3256:dihydrogen monoxide 3174:dihydrogen monoxide 3081:dihydrogen monoxide 3028:dihydrogen monoxide 2953:dihydrogen monoxide 2912:dihydrogen monoxide 2857:dihydrogen monoxide 2761:for a good example) 1564:See You Soon is on 490:Selling their songs 5681:how to edit a page 5195:Why say that not? 4122:. (Also read this 1740:I found this from 749:Twisted Logic Tour 102:Conservative party 6158:comment added by 6045: 6028:comment added by 5969: 5952:comment added by 5916: 5885:comment added by 5812: 5795:comment added by 5662: 5648:comment added by 5617:Viva la Vida Tour 5590: 5573:comment added by 5562:until 2009 ends. 5553: 5536:comment added by 5340: 5277: 5236: 5142: 5130:comment added by 5106:Be Black Hole Sun 5081: 5069:comment added by 5008:or Cressa during 4995:Two more points: 4805: 4789:comment added by 4740:discussion here: 4675: 4570: 4531: 4500: 4488:comment added by 4463: 4451:comment added by 4385: 4373:comment added by 4053: 4041:comment added by 4035:youtube videos. 3997: 3985:comment added by 3955:original research 3947: 3935:comment added by 3884:Reliable sources 3839: 3827:comment added by 3805:for examples. -- 3793: 3781:comment added by 3747: 3735:comment added by 3655:original research 3539:original research 3499: 3487:comment added by 3432: 3420:comment added by 3351: 3269: 3209:Come Speak To Me' 3187: 3129:Come Speak To Me' 3094: 3063:Come Speak To Me' 3041: 3014:Come Speak To Me' 2966: 2925: 2870: 2854:would be nice... 2523: 2511:comment added by 2223: 2211:comment added by 2151: 2139:comment added by 2106: 1921: 1890: 1680: 1666:comment added by 1537: 1499: 1268:This news posting 1245: 1231:comment added by 1032: 1020:comment added by 981: 950:assume good faith 786:(Buckley, Travis) 780:(Buckley, Travis) 621:assume good faith 555:influences, redux 400: 283: 82: 81: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 6206: 6199: 6192: 6170: 6145: 6143: 6137: 6119: 6116: 6113: 6106: 6103: 6094:Christian themes 6044: 6022: 5968: 5946: 5931: 5930: 5928: 5919: 5914: 5897: 5811: 5789: 5781:Coldplay Lawsuit 5736: 5728: 5723: 5720: 5661: 5642: 5589: 5567: 5552: 5530: 5338: 5334: 5263: 5222: 5168: 5160: 5155: 5152: 5125: 5119:Prospekt's March 5064: 5036:reliable sources 5006:The Fifth Beatle 4899: 4891: 4886: 4883: 4815:reliable sources 4784: 4669: 4582:User:Brynnar/sig 4564: 4525: 4483: 4446: 4391:reliable sources 4368: 4324:WP:SELFPUBLISHED 4317:reliable sources 4059:reliable sources 4036: 3980: 3930: 3822: 3776: 3730: 3535:reliable sources 3482: 3415: 3341: 3295: 3292: 3279: 3259: 3244: 3241: 3228: 3212: 3201: 3197: 3177: 3165: 3162: 3149: 3132: 3121: 3117: 3084: 3066: 3055: 3051: 3031: 3017: 3006: 3002: 2992: 2989: 2976: 2956: 2915: 2896: 2893: 2880: 2860: 2836: 2835: 2832: 2819: 2688: 2687: 2684: 2671: 2654: 2647: 2611: 2610: 2607: 2594: 2577: 2576: 2573: 2560: 2506: 2489: 2481: 2476: 2473: 2457: 2449: 2439: 2431: 2426: 2423: 2406: 2404: 2330:Please don't. -- 2251:Prospekt's March 2206: 2134: 2092: 1903: 1876: 1799: 1725:Is / Are Dispute 1679: 1660: 1583:Toronto concert? 1566:The Blue Room EP 1519: 1514:Beautiful World? 1481: 1458: 1452: 1418:I don't agree.-- 1244: 1225: 1015: 978: 973: 970: 674:personal attacks 587:personal attacks 585:or resorting to 394: 302:DanDanRevolution 277: 68: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 6214: 6213: 6209: 6208: 6207: 6205: 6204: 6203: 6202: 6193: 6189: 6153: 6141: 6139: 6135: 6117: 6114: 6109: 6104: 6099: 6070: 6051: 6023: 5975: 5947: 5940: 5938:Picture Change? 5922: 5910: 5908: 5907: 5903: 5880: 5877: 5790: 5783: 5729: 5724: 5718: 5715: 5643: 5639: 5596: 5568: 5559: 5531: 5527: 5368: 5366:Just Alt. Rock? 5336: 5201: 5178: 5161: 5156: 5150: 5147: 5121: 5102: 5087:British English 5061: 5010:The Stone Roses 4928: 4909: 4892: 4887: 4881: 4878: 4780: 4761: 4734: 4696: 4615:Franz Ferdinand 4443: 4120:reliable source 4003:reliable source 3890:Tenacious D Fan 3864: 3772: 3757:Tenacious D Fan 3753: 3489:134.240.148.207 3438: 3412: 3374: 3347: 3332:, if you wish. 3290: 3287: 3277: 3265: 3239: 3236: 3226: 3205: 3198: 3195: 3183: 3160: 3157: 3147: 3125: 3118: 3115: 3090: 3059: 3052: 3049: 3037: 3010: 3003: 3000: 2987: 2984: 2974: 2962: 2921: 2891: 2888: 2878: 2866: 2848:Nine Inch Nails 2830: 2827: 2817: 2815: 2700: 2682: 2679: 2669: 2667: 2652: 2645: 2621: 2605: 2602: 2592: 2590: 2571: 2568: 2558: 2556: 2549:reliable source 2545: 2503: 2482: 2477: 2471: 2468: 2455: 2447: 2432: 2427: 2421: 2418: 2402: 2400: 2393: 2367: 2348: 2311: 2229: 2200: 2171: 2157: 2093:—The preceding 2088: 2020: 1989:tongue-in-cheek 1971: 1927: 1904:—The preceding 1899: 1847:More examples: 1797: 1727: 1713:Merriam-Webster 1705: 1661: 1657: 1634: 1619: 1604: 1592:topic up there 1585: 1520:—The preceding 1516: 1482:—The preceding 1478: 1456: 1450: 1404: 1389: 1288: 1226: 1216: 1160: 1129: 1101: 1087: 1056: 1041: 1012: 976: 968: 882:The Scientist's 808:, Sept. 2000 ( 710: 557: 548: 529: 492: 483: 468: 408:Septentrionalis 337: 178:Make Trade Fair 87: 64: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 6212: 6210: 6201: 6200: 6186: 6150: 6149: 6128: 6126: 6125: 6080:220.237.37.165 6069: 6066: 6050: 6047: 5974: 5971: 5939: 5936: 5902: 5899: 5876: 5873: 5855: 5853: 5852: 5851: 5850: 5782: 5779: 5778: 5777: 5776: 5775: 5774: 5773: 5772: 5771: 5672:edit this page 5638: 5635: 5634: 5633: 5632: 5631: 5595: 5592: 5558: 5555: 5526: 5523: 5522: 5521: 5468:Ladyjanegrey94 5464: 5463: 5434: 5433: 5432: 5431: 5430: 5429: 5367: 5364: 5363: 5362: 5347: 5346: 5316:Ladyjanegrey94 5286:Ladyjanegrey94 5282: 5281: 5254: 5253: 5252: 5251: 5250: 5200: 5197: 5177: 5174: 5173: 5172: 5120: 5117: 5101: 5098: 5097: 5096: 5060: 5057: 5056: 5055: 5032: 4993: 4992: 4991: 4990: 4927: 4924: 4908: 4905: 4904: 4903: 4844: 4843: 4825: 4818: 4779: 4776: 4760: 4757: 4733: 4730: 4729: 4728: 4695: 4692: 4691: 4690: 4680: 4679: 4598: 4597: 4596: 4595: 4594: 4593: 4592: 4591: 4590: 4589: 4588: 4587: 4586: 4585: 4538: 4442: 4439: 4438: 4437: 4422: 4406: 4405: 4375:206.248.44.243 4365: 4363: 4362: 4361: 4360: 4359: 4358: 4357: 4356: 4355: 4354: 4353: 4352: 4320: 4313:external links 4276: 4275: 4274: 4273: 4272: 4271: 4270: 4269: 4257: 4255: 4254: 4253: 4252: 4251: 4250: 4249: 4248: 4236: 4235: 4234: 4233: 4232: 4231: 4230: 4229: 4216: 4215: 4214: 4213: 4212: 4211: 4210: 4209: 4191: 4190: 4189: 4188: 4187: 4186: 4168: 4148: 4147: 4146: 4145: 4144: 4143: 4098: 4097: 4075: 4062: 4043:206.248.44.243 4026: 4025: 3987:206.248.44.243 3972: 3971: 3970: 3969: 3937:206.248.44.243 3922: 3921: 3920: 3919: 3901: 3900: 3863: 3860: 3818: 3817: 3771: 3768: 3752: 3749: 3727: 3726: 3725: 3724: 3723: 3722: 3643: 3642: 3641: 3640: 3639: 3638: 3637: 3636: 3635: 3634: 3633: 3632: 3607:216.36.188.184 3576: 3575: 3574: 3573: 3572: 3571: 3570: 3569: 3478: 3477: 3476: 3475: 3437: 3434: 3422:87.102.114.220 3411: 3408: 3373: 3370: 3359:86.136.133.228 3345: 3310: 3309: 3308: 3307: 3306: 3305: 3304: 3303: 3302: 3301: 3300: 3299: 3263: 3181: 3111: 3110: 3109: 3108: 3107: 3106: 3105: 3104: 3103: 3102: 3101: 3100: 3099: 3098: 3088: 3074:Aaah, my bad. 3035: 2960: 2934:GaryColemanFan 2919: 2907: 2906: 2905: 2904: 2903: 2902: 2901: 2900: 2864: 2808: 2803: 2798: 2793: 2788: 2783: 2778: 2773: 2768: 2763: 2754: 2749: 2744: 2731: 2730: 2729: 2719: 2714: 2709: 2699: 2696: 2695: 2694: 2693: 2692: 2661: 2660: 2633: 2620: 2617: 2616: 2615: 2544: 2541: 2540: 2539: 2502: 2499: 2498: 2497: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2493: 2392: 2389: 2388: 2387: 2366: 2363: 2347: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2310: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2304: 2303: 2302: 2301: 2228: 2225: 2199: 2196: 2195: 2194: 2170: 2167: 2156: 2155:Reorganization 2153: 2131: 2130: 2118:articles, not 2087: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2078: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2048: 2047: 2019: 2016: 1999: 1998: 1970: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1926: 1923: 1898: 1895: 1859: 1858: 1855: 1852: 1831:137.222.215.52 1814: 1813: 1812: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1807: 1726: 1723: 1704: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1656: 1653: 1633: 1630: 1618: 1615: 1603: 1600: 1584: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1515: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1488:71.194.125.169 1477: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1444: 1443: 1403: 1400: 1394:81.157.114.169 1388: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1287: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1263: 1262: 1252: 1251: 1215: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1202: 1201: 1190: 1189: 1159: 1156: 1128: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1100: 1097: 1091:58.162.103.251 1086: 1083: 1055: 1052: 1040: 1037: 1011: 1005: 1004: 1003: 1002: 1001: 1000: 999: 998: 997: 996: 995: 897: 896: 891: 889: 888: 873: 872: 871: 870: 869: 868: 858: 848: 833: 832: 818: 817: 816: 815: 814: 813: 803: 793: 787: 781: 775: 764: 763: 753: 752: 709: 706: 704: 702: 701: 700: 699: 698: 697: 696: 695: 694: 693: 626: 625: 616: 615: 614: 613: 605: 604: 594: 593: 556: 553: 547: 546:External Links 544: 543: 542: 528: 525: 524: 523: 522: 521: 514: 512: 511: 491: 488: 482: 481:Rejected songs 479: 467: 464: 453: 452: 451: 450: 449: 448: 447: 446: 445: 444: 443: 442: 422: 421: 420: 419: 418: 417: 416: 415: 414: 413: 336: 333: 332: 331: 319: 307: 287: 266: 249: 232: 231: 230: 229: 208: 207: 164: 163: 149: 113:prime minister 86: 83: 80: 79: 74: 69: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 6211: 6197: 6191: 6188: 6185: 6184: 6180: 6176: 6171: 6169: 6165: 6161: 6157: 6148: 6144: 6138: 6131: 6130: 6129: 6124: 6121: 6120: 6112: 6107: 6102: 6095: 6092: 6091: 6090: 6089: 6085: 6081: 6077: 6075: 6067: 6065: 6064: 6060: 6056: 6055:Christo jones 6048: 6046: 6043: 6039: 6035: 6031: 6027: 6018: 6017: 6013: 6009: 6004: 6003: 5999: 5995: 5989: 5988: 5984: 5980: 5972: 5970: 5967: 5963: 5959: 5955: 5951: 5943: 5937: 5935: 5934: 5929: 5927: 5926: 5920: 5918: 5917: 5900: 5898: 5896: 5892: 5888: 5887:81.111.147.62 5884: 5874: 5872: 5871: 5867: 5863: 5859: 5849: 5845: 5841: 5837: 5836:creaky boards 5833: 5832: 5831: 5827: 5823: 5819: 5815: 5814: 5813: 5810: 5806: 5802: 5798: 5797:Indierocker22 5794: 5788: 5780: 5770: 5766: 5762: 5758: 5757: 5756: 5752: 5748: 5744: 5741: 5740: 5739: 5735: 5733: 5727: 5722: 5721: 5713: 5712: 5711: 5707: 5703: 5699: 5695: 5691: 5687: 5684:, or use the 5683: 5682: 5677: 5673: 5669: 5665: 5664: 5663: 5659: 5655: 5651: 5647: 5636: 5630: 5626: 5622: 5618: 5614: 5613: 5612: 5611: 5610: 5609: 5605: 5601: 5593: 5591: 5588: 5584: 5580: 5576: 5572: 5565: 5556: 5554: 5551: 5547: 5543: 5539: 5535: 5524: 5520: 5516: 5512: 5508: 5505: 5502: 5498: 5495: 5492: 5489: 5486:, as well as 5485: 5480: 5479: 5478: 5477: 5473: 5469: 5462: 5458: 5454: 5450: 5449: 5448: 5447: 5443: 5439: 5428: 5424: 5420: 5416: 5415: 5414: 5410: 5406: 5402: 5399: 5398: 5397: 5393: 5389: 5385: 5384: 5383: 5382: 5378: 5374: 5365: 5361: 5357: 5353: 5349: 5348: 5345: 5342: 5341: 5339: 5331: 5328: 5327: 5326: 5325: 5321: 5317: 5311: 5310: 5306: 5302: 5296: 5295: 5291: 5287: 5280: 5275: 5271: 5267: 5262: 5259: 5255: 5248: 5247: 5246: 5245: 5242: 5241: 5240: 5239: 5234: 5230: 5226: 5221: 5218: 5214: 5210: 5206: 5198: 5196: 5194: 5191: 5187: 5183: 5175: 5171: 5167: 5165: 5159: 5154: 5153: 5145: 5144: 5143: 5141: 5137: 5133: 5129: 5116: 5115: 5111: 5107: 5100:Great article 5099: 5095: 5092: 5088: 5084: 5083: 5082: 5080: 5076: 5072: 5071:210.11.82.107 5068: 5058: 5054: 5050: 5046: 5042: 5037: 5034:Technically, 5033: 5031: 5027: 5023: 5019: 5017: 5011: 5007: 5003: 5002:George Martin 4998: 4997: 4996: 4989: 4986: 4982: 4978: 4974: 4970: 4965: 4964: 4963: 4959: 4955: 4951: 4946: 4945: 4944: 4943: 4939: 4935: 4934:84.139.71.124 4932: 4925: 4923: 4922: 4918: 4914: 4906: 4902: 4898: 4896: 4890: 4885: 4884: 4876: 4875: 4874: 4873: 4869: 4865: 4861: 4857: 4853: 4849: 4842: 4838: 4834: 4830: 4826: 4823: 4819: 4816: 4812: 4808: 4807: 4806: 4804: 4800: 4796: 4792: 4788: 4775: 4774: 4770: 4766: 4758: 4756: 4755: 4751: 4747: 4743: 4739: 4731: 4727: 4724: 4720: 4716: 4712: 4711: 4710: 4709: 4705: 4701: 4693: 4689: 4686: 4682: 4681: 4678: 4674: 4673: 4668: 4667: 4662: 4661: 4660: 4659: 4655: 4651: 4647: 4643: 4639: 4634: 4631: 4626: 4624: 4620: 4616: 4612: 4607: 4603: 4583: 4578: 4575: 4574: 4573: 4569: 4568: 4563: 4562: 4557: 4553: 4552: 4551: 4547: 4543: 4539: 4536: 4535: 4534: 4530: 4529: 4524: 4523: 4517: 4516: 4515: 4511: 4507: 4502: 4501: 4499: 4495: 4491: 4490:81.155.38.220 4487: 4480: 4479: 4478: 4474: 4470: 4466: 4465: 4464: 4462: 4458: 4454: 4450: 4440: 4436: 4432: 4428: 4423: 4421: 4417: 4413: 4408: 4407: 4404: 4400: 4396: 4392: 4388: 4387: 4386: 4384: 4380: 4376: 4372: 4351: 4347: 4343: 4339: 4338: 4337: 4333: 4329: 4325: 4321: 4318: 4315:, but not as 4314: 4310: 4306: 4302: 4298: 4297: 4296: 4292: 4288: 4284: 4283: 4282: 4281: 4280: 4279: 4278: 4277: 4266: 4265: 4264: 4263: 4262: 4261: 4260: 4259: 4258: 4247: 4244: 4243: 4242: 4241: 4240: 4239: 4238: 4237: 4228: 4224: 4223: 4222: 4221: 4220: 4219: 4218: 4217: 4207: 4203: 4199: 4198: 4197: 4196: 4195: 4194: 4193: 4192: 4185: 4181: 4177: 4173: 4169: 4167: 4163: 4159: 4154: 4153: 4152: 4151: 4150: 4149: 4142: 4138: 4134: 4129: 4125: 4121: 4117: 4116: 4115: 4111: 4107: 4102: 4101: 4100: 4099: 4096: 4092: 4088: 4084: 4080: 4076: 4073: 4068: 4063: 4060: 4056: 4055: 4054: 4052: 4048: 4044: 4040: 4033: 4030: 4024: 4020: 4016: 4012: 4008: 4004: 4000: 3999: 3998: 3996: 3992: 3988: 3984: 3977: 3968: 3964: 3960: 3956: 3952: 3951: 3950: 3949: 3948: 3946: 3942: 3938: 3934: 3927: 3918: 3914: 3910: 3905: 3904: 3903: 3902: 3899: 3895: 3891: 3887: 3883: 3882: 3881: 3880: 3876: 3872: 3868: 3861: 3859: 3858: 3854: 3850: 3845: 3840: 3838: 3834: 3830: 3829:24.254.248.65 3826: 3816: 3812: 3808: 3804: 3800: 3796: 3795: 3794: 3792: 3788: 3784: 3783:24.254.248.65 3780: 3769: 3767: 3766: 3762: 3758: 3750: 3748: 3746: 3742: 3738: 3737:71.232.55.113 3734: 3721: 3717: 3713: 3708: 3707: 3706: 3702: 3698: 3694: 3690: 3685: 3684: 3683: 3679: 3675: 3671: 3670: 3669: 3668: 3664: 3660: 3656: 3652: 3648: 3631: 3627: 3623: 3618: 3617: 3616: 3612: 3608: 3603: 3602: 3601: 3600: 3599: 3598: 3597: 3596: 3595: 3594: 3593: 3592: 3588: 3584: 3580: 3566: 3562: 3558: 3557: 3556: 3552: 3548: 3544: 3540: 3536: 3532: 3531: 3530: 3526: 3522: 3517: 3516: 3515: 3511: 3507: 3502: 3501: 3500: 3498: 3494: 3490: 3486: 3474: 3470: 3466: 3462: 3458: 3457: 3456: 3452: 3448: 3447:71.131.184.64 3444: 3443: 3442: 3435: 3433: 3431: 3427: 3423: 3419: 3409: 3407: 3406: 3402: 3398: 3393: 3389: 3388: 3384: 3380: 3371: 3369: 3368: 3364: 3360: 3355: 3354: 3349: 3340: 3339: 3333: 3331: 3327: 3323: 3319: 3315: 3298: 3293: 3286: 3285: 3283: 3274: 3273: 3272: 3267: 3258: 3257: 3252: 3249: 3248: 3247: 3242: 3235: 3234: 3232: 3223: 3219: 3218: 3217: 3213: 3211: 3210: 3202: 3200: 3192: 3191: 3190: 3185: 3176: 3175: 3170: 3169: 3168: 3163: 3156: 3155: 3153: 3144: 3140: 3139: 3138: 3137: 3133: 3131: 3130: 3122: 3120: 3097: 3092: 3083: 3082: 3077: 3073: 3072: 3071: 3067: 3065: 3064: 3056: 3054: 3046: 3045: 3044: 3039: 3030: 3029: 3024: 3023: 3022: 3018: 3016: 3015: 3007: 3005: 2997: 2996: 2995: 2990: 2983: 2982: 2980: 2971: 2970: 2969: 2964: 2955: 2954: 2949: 2948:WP:MOS#IMAGES 2945: 2944: 2943: 2939: 2935: 2931: 2930: 2929: 2928: 2923: 2914: 2913: 2899: 2894: 2887: 2886: 2884: 2875: 2874: 2873: 2868: 2859: 2858: 2853: 2849: 2845: 2844:Rolling Stone 2841: 2840: 2839: 2833: 2826: 2825: 2823: 2812: 2811: 2809: 2807: 2804: 2802: 2799: 2797: 2794: 2792: 2789: 2787: 2784: 2782: 2779: 2777: 2774: 2772: 2769: 2767: 2764: 2762: 2760: 2755: 2753: 2750: 2748: 2745: 2743: 2741: 2737: 2732: 2728: 2725: 2724: 2723: 2720: 2718: 2715: 2713: 2710: 2708: 2705: 2704: 2703: 2697: 2691: 2685: 2678: 2677: 2675: 2665: 2664: 2663: 2662: 2659: 2656: 2655: 2649: 2648: 2641: 2640: 2634: 2630: 2626: 2625: 2624: 2618: 2614: 2608: 2601: 2600: 2598: 2588: 2587:Rolling Stone 2583: 2582: 2581: 2580: 2574: 2567: 2566: 2564: 2554: 2550: 2542: 2538: 2534: 2530: 2526: 2525: 2524: 2522: 2518: 2514: 2513:79.65.146.165 2510: 2500: 2492: 2488: 2486: 2480: 2475: 2474: 2466: 2465: 2464: 2460: 2459: 2458: 2450: 2444: 2443: 2442: 2438: 2436: 2430: 2425: 2424: 2416: 2412: 2411: 2410: 2409: 2405: 2398: 2390: 2386: 2382: 2378: 2373: 2372: 2371: 2364: 2362: 2361: 2357: 2353: 2345: 2341: 2337: 2333: 2329: 2328: 2327: 2325: 2321: 2317: 2316:190.17.68.133 2308: 2300: 2296: 2292: 2288: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2278: 2274: 2270: 2269: 2268: 2264: 2260: 2256: 2252: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2244: 2240: 2236: 2232: 2226: 2224: 2222: 2218: 2214: 2210: 2203: 2197: 2193: 2190: 2186: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2176: 2168: 2166: 2165: 2162: 2154: 2152: 2150: 2146: 2142: 2141:71.87.195.157 2138: 2129: 2126: 2121: 2117: 2113: 2109: 2108: 2107: 2104: 2100: 2099:67.49.168.240 2096: 2085: 2077: 2074: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2065: 2060: 2057: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2046: 2043: 2039: 2038: 2037: 2036: 2033: 2029: 2025: 2017: 2015: 2013: 2008: 2007: 2004: 2003:84.57.159.231 1997: 1994: 1990: 1986: 1982: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1976: 1968: 1964: 1961: 1956: 1955: 1954: 1953: 1950: 1946: 1942: 1938: 1934: 1931: 1924: 1922: 1919: 1915: 1911: 1910:71.134.186.38 1907: 1896: 1894: 1893: 1888: 1884: 1880: 1875: 1872: 1868: 1867:Obento Musubi 1862: 1856: 1853: 1850: 1849: 1848: 1845: 1841: 1840: 1836: 1832: 1829: 1826: 1823: 1820: 1806: 1803: 1800: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1789: 1788:219.74.66.240 1785: 1784: 1783: 1780: 1776: 1772: 1768: 1764: 1760: 1756: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1747: 1743: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1733: 1724: 1722: 1721: 1718: 1714: 1710: 1702: 1698: 1695: 1691: 1687: 1683: 1682: 1681: 1677: 1673: 1669: 1665: 1654: 1652: 1651: 1648: 1643: 1642: 1639: 1638:219.75.59.153 1631: 1629: 1628: 1625: 1616: 1614: 1613: 1610: 1601: 1599: 1598: 1595: 1591: 1582: 1574: 1571: 1567: 1563: 1562: 1561: 1558: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1548: 1544: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1535: 1531: 1527: 1523: 1513: 1509: 1506: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1497: 1493: 1489: 1485: 1475: 1469: 1466: 1462: 1455: 1448: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1442: 1439: 1435: 1431: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1421: 1416: 1415: 1412: 1407: 1401: 1399: 1398: 1395: 1386: 1376: 1373: 1369: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1359: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1349: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1340: 1336: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1325: 1321: 1316: 1312: 1309: 1303: 1299: 1297: 1293: 1292:good articles 1285: 1281: 1278: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1264: 1261: 1258: 1254: 1253: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1242: 1238: 1234: 1230: 1221: 1220: 1213: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1200: 1197: 1192: 1191: 1188: 1185: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1176: 1172: 1168: 1164: 1157: 1155: 1154: 1151: 1150:71.252.157.36 1146: 1145: 1142: 1138: 1134: 1126: 1122: 1119: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1109: 1105: 1098: 1096: 1095: 1092: 1085:Rush of Blood 1084: 1082: 1081: 1078: 1073: 1072: 1069: 1065: 1061: 1053: 1051: 1050: 1047: 1038: 1036: 1033: 1031: 1027: 1023: 1019: 1009: 1006: 994: 991: 990:wikipediatrix 986: 985: 984: 979: 972: 971: 964: 963: 962: 959: 955: 951: 946: 945: 944: 941: 940:wikipediatrix 937: 932: 928: 924: 920: 917: 916: 915: 912: 907: 903: 899: 898: 894: 893: 892: 886: 883: 879: 875: 874: 866: 862: 859: 856: 852: 849: 846: 842: 839: 838: 837: 836: 835: 834: 830: 829: 824: 820: 819: 811: 807: 804: 801: 797: 794: 791: 788: 785: 782: 779: 776: 773: 770: 769: 768: 767: 766: 765: 761: 760: 755: 754: 750: 746: 742: 738: 734: 733: 732: 731: 728: 727:wikipediatrix 724: 720: 716: 707: 705: 692: 689: 688:wikipediatrix 684: 683: 682: 679: 675: 671: 670: 669: 666: 665:wikipediatrix 661: 656: 655: 654: 653: 652: 649: 645: 641: 637: 633: 628: 627: 622: 618: 617: 612: 609: 608: 607: 606: 602: 601: 596: 595: 591: 588: 584: 580: 579: 578: 577: 574: 573:wikipediatrix 569: 565: 561: 554: 552: 545: 541: 538: 534: 533: 532: 526: 519: 518: 517: 516: 515: 510: 507: 503: 502: 501: 497: 496: 489: 487: 480: 478: 477: 474: 465: 463: 462: 459: 441: 438: 437:quercus robur 434: 433: 432: 431: 430: 429: 428: 427: 426: 425: 424: 423: 412: 409: 405: 404: 403: 398: 393: 392: 386: 385: 384: 381: 380:quercus robur 377: 373: 372: 371: 368: 363: 359: 358: 357: 354: 349: 348: 347: 346: 343: 342:quercus robur 334: 330: 327: 323: 320: 318: 315: 311: 308: 306: 303: 299: 295: 291: 288: 286: 281: 276: 275: 270: 267: 265: 261: 257: 253: 250: 248: 245: 241: 237: 234: 233: 228: 227: 224: 223:quercus robur 220: 217: 212: 211: 210: 209: 206: 203: 199: 195: 191: 187: 183: 179: 175: 172: 171: 170: 168: 162: 159: 154: 150: 147: 146:quercus robur 144: 143: 142: 140: 136: 133: 132: 128: 127: 125: 122: 119: 117: 114: 111: 107: 106:David Cameron 103: 99: 96: 90: 84: 78: 75: 73: 70: 67: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 18:Talk:Coldplay 6190: 6175:78.145.72.73 6172: 6160:81.76.95.203 6151: 6127: 6110: 6100: 6097: 6093: 6078: 6073: 6071: 6052: 6019: 6005: 5990: 5976: 5954:Masterbasset 5944: 5941: 5924: 5923: 5912: 5911: 5904: 5878: 5854: 5784: 5731: 5717: 5680: 5671: 5640: 5616: 5597: 5594:current tour 5560: 5528: 5465: 5435: 5369: 5337:ReplyOnMine! 5333: 5332: 5330: 5312: 5297: 5283: 5212: 5208: 5204: 5202: 5179: 5163: 5149: 5122: 5103: 5062: 5013: 4994: 4981:Mr Anchorman 4972: 4929: 4913:68.73.55.192 4910: 4907:Year Started 4894: 4880: 4859: 4845: 4828: 4821: 4791:Cynical Andy 4781: 4762: 4735: 4697: 4670: 4664: 4641: 4637: 4635: 4627: 4605: 4601: 4599: 4576: 4565: 4559: 4526: 4520: 4453:86.150.34.77 4444: 4364: 4316: 4312: 4308: 4256: 4245: 4225: 4127: 4027: 3973: 3923: 3865: 3841: 3819: 3773: 3754: 3728: 3712:71.231.123.7 3674:71.231.123.7 3646: 3644: 3622:71.231.123.7 3583:71.231.123.7 3578: 3577: 3564: 3533:You'll need 3521:71.231.123.7 3479: 3465:71.231.123.7 3439: 3413: 3390: 3375: 3356: 3336: 3334: 3318:good article 3311: 3281: 3280: 3254: 3230: 3229: 3208: 3207: 3199: 3172: 3151: 3150: 3142: 3128: 3127: 3119: 3112: 3079: 3062: 3061: 3053: 3026: 3013: 3012: 3004: 2978: 2977: 2951: 2910: 2908: 2882: 2881: 2855: 2851: 2843: 2821: 2820: 2805: 2800: 2795: 2790: 2785: 2780: 2775: 2770: 2765: 2756: 2751: 2746: 2739: 2738:complete", " 2735: 2733: 2726: 2721: 2716: 2711: 2706: 2701: 2673: 2672: 2651: 2644: 2637: 2628: 2622: 2596: 2595: 2562: 2561: 2546: 2504: 2484: 2470: 2453: 2452: 2434: 2420: 2414: 2394: 2368: 2349: 2312: 2286: 2254: 2250: 2230: 2213:70.20.47.236 2204: 2201: 2172: 2158: 2132: 2119: 2115: 2089: 2028:WP:FLAGCRUFT 2021: 2009: 2000: 1975:88.64.123.21 1972: 1928: 1900: 1863: 1860: 1846: 1842: 1815: 1775:Keane (band) 1771:Led Zeppelin 1767:Queen (band) 1762: 1758: 1754: 1728: 1706: 1658: 1647:StvnLunsford 1644: 1635: 1624:StvnLunsford 1620: 1605: 1589: 1586: 1526:72.95.55.191 1517: 1479: 1433: 1429: 1417: 1408: 1405: 1390: 1367: 1317: 1313: 1307: 1304: 1300: 1289: 1222: 1218: 1217: 1177: 1173: 1169: 1165: 1161: 1147: 1130: 1102: 1088: 1074: 1057: 1042: 1034: 1022:65.217.10.10 1013: 966: 953: 935: 930: 926: 922: 918: 905: 890: 864: 854: 844: 826: 809: 805: 799: 757: 745:Ring of Fire 722: 711: 703: 610: 598: 567: 563: 558: 549: 530: 513: 498: 494: 493: 484: 469: 454: 390: 375: 362:Chris Martin 338: 321: 309: 289: 273: 268: 251: 235: 215: 213: 185: 173: 166: 165: 153:inclusionist 138: 137: 134: 130: 129: 92: 91: 88: 65: 43: 37: 6154:—Preceding 6024:—Preceding 5948:—Preceding 5881:—Preceding 5791:—Preceding 5644:—Preceding 5621:Flashflash; 5600:Wikisaver62 5569:—Preceding 5532:—Preceding 5419:WesleyDodds 5388:WesleyDodds 5209:the members 5132:64.4.68.114 5126:—Preceding 5065:—Preceding 5016:Phil Harvey 4785:—Preceding 4646:The Beatles 4484:—Preceding 4447:—Preceding 4369:—Preceding 4299:Time out. 4037:—Preceding 3981:—Preceding 3953:Sorry, but 3931:—Preceding 3823:—Preceding 3803:this search 3799:this search 3777:—Preceding 3731:—Preceding 3483:—Preceding 3416:—Preceding 3379:86.17.250.9 2759:Silverchair 2698:GAN on hold 2507:—Preceding 2346:The Nappies 2207:—Preceding 2135:—Preceding 2110:Please see 1985:Hilary Duff 1798:londonsista 1690:vandalising 1684:If you can 1668:SteveyWevey 1662:—Preceding 1543:Don't Panic 1227:—Preceding 1039:Link Broken 1016:—Preceding 646:, etc. -- 644:The Killers 527:Death Metal 326:DreamsReign 156:be a stub. 36:This is an 5994:Dreamboy81 5840:Tstrobaugh 5822:Madchester 5719:ThinkBlue 5484:piano rock 5401:Starsailor 5151:ThinkBlue 5091:Matt Eason 5045:Madchester 5022:Madchester 4985:Matt Eason 4954:Madchester 4882:ThinkBlue 4864:Madchester 4833:Madchester 4765:Madchester 4746:Tsurugaoka 4723:Matt Eason 4650:Madchester 4611:The Police 4602:individual 4542:Madchester 4506:Madchester 4469:Madchester 4427:Madchester 4395:Madchester 4328:Madchester 4202:WP:YOUTUBE 4200:I checked 4176:Madchester 4133:Madchester 4087:Madchester 4015:Madchester 3959:Madchester 3697:Madchester 3659:Madchester 3547:Madchester 3506:Madchester 2740:Eventually 2529:Madchester 2472:ThinkBlue 2422:ThinkBlue 2377:Chensiyuan 2352:Crislee 88 2198:New album: 2189:Matt Eason 2125:Matt Eason 1993:Matt Eason 1949:Matt Eason 1930:ShadowHalo 1694:Matt Eason 1617:Direction? 1570:Matt Eason 1547:Matt Eason 1505:Matt Eason 1438:Kicking222 1434:acceptable 1402:Box Layout 1372:Kicking222 1358:Madchester 1348:Kicking222 1339:Madchester 1324:Kicking222 1277:Matt Eason 1257:Matt Eason 1184:Painbearer 1141:Madchester 1118:Madchester 1108:BlueValour 1077:Apterygial 958:Madchester 911:Madchester 806:Q magazine 759:Parachutes 708:influences 678:Madchester 648:Madchester 560:Madchester 537:Matt Eason 367:Madchester 294:Madchester 202:Madchester 116:Tony Blair 110:New Labour 6074:Christian 5945:Thanks! 5511:Eugeniu B 5438:RonDivine 4694:fake pic. 4630:Andy Bell 4322:Also see 3807:The Anome 3653:, if not 2852:something 2259:kollision 2086:Confusing 1686:source it 1655:Criticism 1609:Jgrizzy89 1465:kollision 1430:necessary 1411:Vincspenc 1133:Radiohead 1099:Redirects 931:Secondly, 902:WP:WEASEL 741:Kraftwerk 719:WP:WEASEL 632:Radiohead 506:Ianiceboy 473:Esprit15d 186:paragraph 158:KalevTait 77:Archive 4 72:Archive 3 66:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 6156:unsigned 6038:contribs 6026:unsigned 6008:Danno uk 5979:Danno uk 5962:contribs 5950:unsigned 5883:unsigned 5862:Dom Kaos 5805:contribs 5793:unsigned 5658:contribs 5650:Gadiandi 5646:unsigned 5637:Spelling 5583:contribs 5571:unsigned 5546:contribs 5534:unsigned 5182:יוני לוי 5128:unsigned 5067:unsigned 4799:contribs 4787:unsigned 4486:unsigned 4449:unsigned 4371:unsigned 4079:WP:LIBEL 4039:unsigned 3983:unsigned 3933:unsigned 3849:Cubbieco 3825:unsigned 3779:unsigned 3751:EP names 3733:unsigned 3579:refusing 3485:unsigned 3418:unsigned 3335:Cheers, 2509:unsigned 2291:Scjessey 2255:Prospekt 2209:unsigned 2137:unsigned 2095:unsigned 2056:Scjessey 1960:Scjessey 1906:unsigned 1779:Scjessey 1746:Chris 42 1732:Comtraya 1717:Chris 42 1703:Comprise 1676:contribs 1664:unsigned 1522:unsigned 1484:unsigned 1241:contribs 1229:unsigned 1182:Regards 1018:unsigned 936:Thirdly, 919:Firstly, 821:And for 376:Coldplay 335:Proposal 322:Disagree 310:Disagree 290:Disagree 269:Disagree 252:Disagree 244:Quiddity 236:Disagree 174:Disagree 167:Disagree 98:Guardian 5787:article 5686:sandbox 5538:Jerichx 5497:artists 5453:Titan50 5405:Titan50 5373:Titan50 4848:Britpop 4685:Spartaz 3689:WP:NPOV 3397:Titan50 3196:Realist 3116:Realist 3050:Realist 3001:Realist 2736:finally 2024:England 1941:WP:NPOV 1937:WP:NPOV 1932:removed 1420:Fluence 1214:What??? 1196:Fluence 1104:Trouble 1068:BM20950 954:improve 104:leader 39:archive 5694:log in 5261:Musubi 5258:Obento 5220:Musubi 5217:Obento 5211:, not 4977:WP:SYN 4856:WP:BLP 4852:Travis 4666:Justin 4621:, and 4606:band's 4561:Justin 4556:WP:3RR 4522:Justin 4227:basis. 4083:WP:BLP 4011:WP:BLP 3871:Sbw01f 3693:WP:NOR 3647:change 3330:mentor 3076:plenty 2972:Moved 2175:Gorman 2169:Marvin 2120:across 2116:within 1874:Musubi 1871:Obento 1432:, but 1335:Source 1320:WP:GAC 1233:Sebrat 762:album: 715:Travis 471:POV.-- 458:Centrx 314:Cedars 182:Live 8 6105:ittle 6049:Sales 6030:SgtCP 5973:Sales 5820:". -- 5761:JD554 5747:JD554 5702:JD554 5700:). -- 5575:Chekt 5501:bands 5488:quite 5059:Typo! 5043:. -- 4973:first 4952:. -- 4759:Genre 4738:WP:EL 4700:NIS3R 4619:Queen 4412:F33bs 4342:F33bs 4305:WP:RS 4301:WP:EL 4287:F33bs 4206:WP:EL 4172:WP:RS 4158:F33bs 4106:F33bs 3909:F33bs 3312:This 2876:Done 2646:Jamie 2619:Prose 2448:RyRy5 2403:RyRy5 2309:Dates 2273:Kevin 2235:Kevin 2161:Dh993 1945:allow 1943:does 1777:. -- 1730:it?-- 1541:It's 1224:back. 1137:Oasis 660:WP:OR 636:Oasis 139:Agree 16:< 6179:talk 6164:talk 6142:talk 6115:lien 6084:talk 6059:talk 6034:talk 6012:talk 5998:talk 5983:talk 5958:talk 5891:talk 5866:talk 5858:here 5844:talk 5826:talk 5801:talk 5765:talk 5751:talk 5745:. -- 5732:BLUE 5726:(Hit 5706:talk 5668:wiki 5654:talk 5625:talk 5604:talk 5579:talk 5542:talk 5515:talk 5507:have 5504:that 5472:talk 5457:talk 5442:talk 5423:talk 5409:talk 5392:talk 5377:talk 5356:talk 5352:Alai 5320:talk 5305:talk 5301:Alai 5290:talk 5215:. – 5205:must 5186:talk 5164:BLUE 5158:(Hit 5136:talk 5110:talk 5075:talk 5049:talk 5026:talk 4979:). 4969:here 4958:talk 4938:talk 4917:talk 4895:BLUE 4889:(Hit 4868:talk 4837:talk 4811:WP:V 4809:Per 4795:talk 4769:talk 4750:talk 4721:. — 4719:here 4717:and 4715:here 4704:talk 4672:talk 4654:talk 4642:band 4623:Blur 4567:talk 4546:talk 4528:talk 4510:talk 4494:talk 4473:talk 4457:talk 4431:talk 4416:talk 4399:talk 4379:talk 4346:talk 4332:talk 4303:and 4291:talk 4204:and 4180:talk 4162:talk 4137:talk 4110:talk 4091:talk 4081:and 4072:here 4067:link 4047:talk 4019:talk 4013:. -- 3991:talk 3963:talk 3941:talk 3913:talk 3894:talk 3886:here 3875:talk 3867:This 3853:talk 3833:talk 3811:talk 3801:and 3787:talk 3761:talk 3741:talk 3716:talk 3701:talk 3691:and 3678:talk 3663:talk 3626:talk 3611:talk 3587:talk 3551:talk 3525:talk 3510:talk 3493:talk 3469:talk 3451:talk 3426:talk 3401:talk 3383:talk 3363:talk 3291:talk 3278:Gary 3240:talk 3227:Gary 3222:this 3161:talk 3148:Gary 2988:talk 2975:Gary 2938:talk 2892:talk 2879:Gary 2831:talk 2818:Gary 2683:talk 2670:Gary 2632:ref? 2606:talk 2593:Gary 2572:talk 2559:Gary 2533:talk 2517:talk 2485:BLUE 2479:(Hit 2456:talk 2435:BLUE 2429:(Hit 2415:tons 2381:talk 2356:talk 2336:talk 2332:John 2320:talk 2295:talk 2277:talk 2263:talk 2239:talk 2217:talk 2145:talk 2103:talk 2073:John 2042:John 2032:John 2018:Flag 1991:. — 1914:talk 1835:talk 1763:they 1709:here 1672:talk 1594:paat 1557:paat 1530:talk 1492:talk 1237:talk 1135:and 1064:here 1060:here 1026:talk 977:talk 923:your 906:also 825:for 737:Talk 640:Blur 583:cool 397:Talk 280:Talk 242:. -- 240:WP:N 5494:few 4860:not 4822:can 4128:not 3314:GAN 3284:ing 3233:ing 3154:ing 3143:did 2981:ing 2885:ing 2824:ing 2676:ing 2653:S93 2599:ing 2565:ing 2287:not 1755:are 1368:any 1308:one 1250:it. 969:DJR 927:you 391:DJR 300:" - 274:DJR 262:); 260:yo? 258:• ( 216:NOT 194:POV 6181:) 6166:) 6118:¹² 6086:) 6061:) 6040:) 6036:• 6014:) 6000:) 5985:) 5964:) 5960:• 5925:57 5893:) 5868:) 5846:) 5828:) 5807:) 5803:• 5767:) 5753:) 5708:) 5656:• 5627:) 5606:) 5585:) 5581:• 5548:) 5544:• 5517:) 5474:) 5459:) 5444:) 5425:) 5411:) 5394:) 5379:) 5358:) 5322:) 5307:) 5292:) 5272:• 5268:• 5231:• 5227:• 5188:) 5180:-- 5138:) 5112:) 5077:) 5051:) 5028:) 4960:) 4940:) 4919:) 4870:) 4839:) 4831:-- 4801:) 4797:• 4771:) 4752:) 4706:) 4656:) 4617:, 4613:, 4548:) 4512:) 4496:) 4475:) 4459:) 4433:) 4425:-- 4418:) 4401:) 4381:) 4348:) 4334:) 4293:) 4182:) 4164:) 4139:) 4131:-- 4112:) 4093:) 4049:) 4021:) 3993:) 3965:) 3943:) 3915:) 3896:) 3888:. 3877:) 3855:) 3835:) 3813:) 3789:) 3763:) 3743:) 3718:) 3703:) 3680:) 3665:) 3628:) 3613:) 3589:) 3563:. 3553:) 3527:) 3512:) 3495:) 3471:) 3453:) 3428:) 3403:) 3385:) 3365:) 3214:) 3134:) 3068:) 3019:) 2950:. 2940:) 2589:. 2555:. 2535:) 2519:) 2461:) 2397:GA 2383:) 2358:) 2338:) 2326:) 2322:) 2297:) 2279:) 2265:) 2241:) 2219:) 2147:) 2014:" 1916:) 1885:• 1881:• 1837:) 1801:| 1769:, 1759:is 1678:) 1674:• 1532:) 1494:) 1457:}} 1451:{{ 1409:-- 1298:: 1243:) 1239:• 1028:) 909:-- 642:, 638:, 634:, 180:, 95:UK 6177:( 6162:( 6111:Ä 6101:Ł 6082:( 6057:( 6032:( 6010:( 5996:( 5981:( 5956:( 5915:N 5913:P 5889:( 5864:( 5842:( 5838:. 5824:( 5799:( 5763:( 5749:( 5734:) 5704:( 5652:( 5623:( 5602:( 5577:( 5540:( 5513:( 5499:/ 5491:a 5470:( 5455:( 5440:( 5421:( 5407:( 5390:( 5375:( 5354:( 5318:( 5303:( 5288:( 5276:) 5274:S 5270:G 5266:C 5264:( 5235:) 5233:S 5229:G 5225:C 5223:( 5184:( 5166:) 5134:( 5108:( 5073:( 5047:( 5024:( 4956:( 4936:( 4915:( 4897:) 4866:( 4835:( 4793:( 4767:( 4748:( 4702:( 4652:( 4544:( 4508:( 4492:( 4471:( 4455:( 4429:( 4414:( 4397:( 4377:( 4344:( 4330:( 4289:( 4208:. 4178:( 4160:( 4135:( 4108:( 4089:( 4045:( 4017:( 3989:( 3961:( 3939:( 3911:( 3892:( 3873:( 3851:( 3831:( 3809:( 3785:( 3759:( 3739:( 3714:( 3699:( 3676:( 3661:( 3624:( 3609:( 3585:( 3549:( 3523:( 3508:( 3491:( 3467:( 3449:( 3424:( 3399:( 3381:( 3361:( 3350:) 3348:O 3346:2 3344:H 3342:( 3294:) 3288:( 3282:K 3268:) 3266:O 3264:2 3262:H 3260:( 3243:) 3237:( 3231:K 3206:' 3203:( 3186:) 3184:O 3182:2 3180:H 3178:( 3164:) 3158:( 3152:K 3126:' 3123:( 3093:) 3091:O 3089:2 3087:H 3085:( 3060:' 3057:( 3040:) 3038:O 3036:2 3034:H 3032:( 3011:' 3008:( 2991:) 2985:( 2979:K 2965:) 2963:O 2961:2 2959:H 2957:( 2936:( 2924:) 2922:O 2920:2 2918:H 2916:( 2895:) 2889:( 2883:K 2869:) 2867:O 2865:2 2863:H 2861:( 2834:) 2828:( 2822:K 2686:) 2680:( 2674:K 2609:) 2603:( 2597:K 2575:) 2569:( 2563:K 2531:( 2515:( 2487:) 2451:( 2437:) 2379:( 2354:( 2334:( 2318:( 2293:( 2275:( 2261:( 2237:( 2215:( 2143:( 2101:( 1920:. 1912:( 1889:) 1887:S 1883:G 1879:C 1877:( 1833:( 1670:( 1536:. 1528:( 1498:. 1490:( 1235:( 1046:Φ 1024:( 1010:? 980:) 974:( 887:. 867:) 863:( 857:) 853:( 847:) 843:( 831:: 812:) 802:) 798:( 751:. 399:) 395:( 282:) 278:( 126:. 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index