Knowledge

Talk:List of computer algebra systems

Source đź“ť

1275:
compiler and know how to use it. I think that makes Windows a "Yes" and Mac a "Yes*" (or "No*" depending on whether we think the majority of WP readers can compile software or not). I think the question of what flavor of an OS is supported is a different question. I think we have to interpret the column in terms of the most important flavors. eg If it fails to work on XP either as a pre-compiled .exe or when you compile it yourself then Windows should be a "No" but if works on XP but not on 95 then it might be a "Yes". If it works on XP when you compile it yourself but the .exe only works on 95 then that would be a "Yes*" (or "No*") Vista should probably not yet be required, but soon should be. Likewise for the main Linux platforms and Mac OSX Intel vs OS9 or OSX classic.
1250:
compiler and know how to use it. I think that makes Windows a "Yes" and Mac a "Yes*" (or "No*" depending on whether we think the majority of WP readers can compile software or not). I think the question of what flavor of an OS is supported is a different question. I think we have to interpret the column in terms of the most important flavors. eg If it fails to work on XP either as a pre-compiled .exe or when you compile it yourself then Windows should be a "No" but if works on XP but not on 95 then it might be a "Yes". If it works on XP when you compile it yourself but the .exe only works on 95 then that would be a "Yes*" (or "No*") Vista should probably not yet be required, but soon should be. Likewise for the main Linux platforms and Mac OSX Intel vs OS9 or OSX classic.
2298:"computer algebra" or "symbolic manipulation" in its documentation. That is a silly definition. Computer algebra is a well established scientific field with several annual conferences (the main one being ISSAC) and several journals (the main one being J. Symbolic Computation). Thus the only valid definition of what is a Computer algebra system is what the specialists think of as a CAS. Moreover the rising importance of computer algebra makes that in becomes unavoidable in scientific computation and that every large numerical library must have some tools imported from computer algebra. This does not make them computer algebra systems. 1302:, which there are binary OS X downloads of. The mailing list for maxima has plenty of posts from OS X users--I fail to see how it isn't a "supported" platform. Other products will have similar potential exceptions & you haven't proposed to do with any program that is distributed only as source. I think the current tables are consistent with other software comparison pages. Before any change, we should make sure that we address some of the "gray area" that will be common for anything marked "yes*" or "no*" under your proposal. -- 616: 606: 585: 2198:: This article has multiple issues. I have began to correct some of them: removing entries that are unambiguously not notable and adding, for each entry, a short comment to inform the reader of its specificities. It appears that other entries should be removed, mainly those that are qualified "Numerical software with some computer algebra capabilities". IMO, such a software is not a computer algebra system and should not appear here. When the cleaning up will be done, I'll will edit 141: 120: 2417:, this would be wrong only because number theorists consider that it is wrong. About the criteria, in the publications of computer algebra, the author frequently cite the CAS's that they have used and the CAS's that they have tested. The lack of source shows that the software that I have qualified as non notable have never been reviewed by an independent expert. However, I may have missed some source. This was the purpose of my last question. 151: 341: 217: 711: 690: 264: 243: 89: 32: 1538:
imagination. (Try a search on jobsite, monstir or other job sites and see how many jobs require Mathematica skills, and one would soon see Mathematica is not ubiquitous. There were zero jobs when I looked, but lots on MATLAB) One could argue that the features of Mathematica are described on the Mathematica page, so why add them to the page on Comparison of Computer Algebra systems?
970:
floats; manipulation of arbitrary symbolic expressions (e.g. PARI can't deal with x^y), animated and/or "interactive" 2D/3D plots, estimated number of known library functions (built-in / shipped with standard distribution as library / available via download), document-like editable worksheets, import / export features, integration into word processing systems, ... —
1229:
compiled for a particular version of windows or OS X? For some cases, using the "depends" template with a note might be appropriate (e.g. relies on cygwin on windows or wine on *nix). I wouldn't necessarily count out non-binaries as "unsupported;" sometimes binaries aren't distributed, but there remains active user assistance (commercial support or otherwise). --
60: 1360:
Windows version of the current release of YACAS. I think this page is misleading those people but not telling them. At the very least the definition above the table should warn them that that this table does not imply binaries are available and that they may need to compile it themselves from whatever language the system is written is.
1323:
caveats. But I think the basic test should be "Can a TYPICAL (insert OS) user go and get/buy (insert system) that will usually WORK without alteration" and I think on that test having to have a compiler and knowledge of using compilers before they can get it to "work", is at least significant enough to highlight.
4197:
But just looking at the data in the table itself, the row for Maple lists the "Latest stable version" as 2024 (6 March 2024) which is not consistent with its "Latest stable release date" being 15 March 2022. Similarly the row for Mathematica lists the latest stable version as 14.0.0 (January 9, 2024)
4184:
I'm a MathWorks employee so I'm not going to edit the page, but I wanted to flag that I believe several of the entries in the table in the General section of the page have out-of-date "Latest stable release dates". The obvious one to my eyes is the Symbolic Math Toolbox (MATLAB) entry. While it lists
3391:
I removed ScaViz, because when I looked into its documentation, I found that it provides no computer algebra capabilities of its own. You can import Java or Python computer algebra via Sympy, Jacsyma, JScl or SymJa. But on this basis any program with a Java or Python API is a computer algebra system.
3223:
which therefore should be expanded in the same style as most articles about a mathematical area. I have started this. Rockmagnetist, the empty sections that you have removed were not intended to help my writing but to give to the reader some idea of the future content of the article (It may be useful
3136:
Although relevant, the discussion seems to be little more than a lot of personal opinions. In Gathen & Gerhard I also see the statement "... mathematical engine underlying any computer algebra system", which supports the definition of a CAS as something more than the mathematical software. Geddes
2297:
To continue of cleaning up this page, I am faced to the problem of what is a CAS and what is the level of notability required to be cited in this page. It appears that the previous editors of this page did consider that a CAS is a software that either allows some formula manipulation or has the words
2202:
to make it an encyclopedic article: explaining what is a CAS system, what are the specificities of CAS's and their differences with other software, describing the unavoidable capabilities, ... Also I'll add a short section for each main system, emphasizing on its specificities. When this program will
1639:
NO. I have edited TWO other math software pages - SAGE where I removed the words "worlds most widely used", "large amounts", "massive" and "easily" (I PREVIUOSLY removed "easy" from Mathematica page also), and AXIOM where I removed the claim that made no sense "Axiom is currently the only CAS with an
1274:
you see that there is a Windows installer (.exe) and the same for Linux (I assume thats what a .rpm file is) but for other platforms you get only the source code that you must compile. So as a Windows user I can download and run Maxima with no special software or skill, but as a Mac user I must get a
1249:
you see that there is a Windows installer (.exe) and the same for Linux (I assume thats what a .rpm file is) but for other platforms you get only the source code that you must compile. So as a Windows user I can download and run Maxima with no special software or skill, but as a Mac user I must get a
969:
while Maple just mentions "Library code is viewable". Needless to say that image processing is not at all relevent when comparing computer algebra systems, while of course Maple provides the same functionalities and more via its toolboxes. Valid criterias might include: arbitrary precision integers /
3414:
The Macsyma entry states: "development started: 1968", while Maxima entry says: "development started: 1967". These two dates cannot be both correct since Maxima is the continuation of Macsyma. I don't know which is right and which is wrong, so I'm not correcting it myself. But definitely there is a
1390:
source, but the binaries often lag behind the source. So what would you do if version 1 has binaries, but is 10 years older than the source code? In some cases, binaries are not created by the developers, but by others. As such, it's always going to be a difficult one to do objectively. Binaries for
1344:
The table is accurately labeled "operating system support" and has an informative note that the only criteria used is whether it runs without emulation on a platform. I see no advantage of changing the heading and description to say that binaries are available & I don't know whether or not this
991:
IMO having the green background color for open source and the red background color for non open source cells, subconsciously suggests that open source is better. Green typically suggests good when compared to red suggesting bad. Regardless of whether or not it is, wikipedia shouldn't come out on one
888:
This list just compares price and license... a real comparison would include features. To put it in another way, I can use this list to quickly find out which CAS's are free, but not which of them is the best (for my purposes). Also the cyan background of the "free" cells is much too bright compared
3190:
I may confirm your impression, at least for the software that allow the user to write programs. In fact, none implementation language used in CAS is compatible with the usual mathematical language (The only exception seems to be Axiom). For the same reason, except for Axiom, there are very rarely a
2502:
I don't think it's quite right to say that a source is required for the list as a whole, at least not if that means for the exact contents of the list. I read the AFD discussion as agreeing that the concept of a list of CAS was a notable concept, in that there are existing sources that discuss the
1634:
I've asked you several times if you have any connections with Wolfram Research and you fail to answer that question. Virtually every time you edit a page about some bit of maths software that is not Mathematica, it plays down the importance, removes the slightest bit of hype (sometimes I accept you
1359:
I have nothing against source distribution. That seems good. But ONLY source distribution is worthy of mentioning. I expect that the large majority of people that might be able to make use of YACAS are not equipped to be able to use in in source-only form. There is no download from the project of a
943:
I totally agree with Gerbrant's comment about it not being a real feature comparison. It would be nice if it contained a table with boxes for things like integration, transforms (perhaps by name), limits, special functions, etc. and opportunities for there to be a summary of the level of coverage
4056:
I'm concerned that you appear to be adding links to the drhuang.com website, which you appear to be closely affiliated with. I'm also unconvinced that the CAS that you are trying to add belongs on the list. Other editors shared my concerns the last time you tried to add similar content, back in
3028:
Gathen & Gerhard (def.1) say "This book presents foundations for the mathematical engine underlying any computer algebra system... Finally, a successful computer algebra system involves much more than just a mathematical engine: efficient data structures, a fast kernel and a large compiled or
2917:
Thanks for all the definitions. The first two seem to apply more generally to computer algebra, while the third one seems most specific to computer algebra systems. Would it be correct to say that a computer algebra system includes both a collection of algorithms and an environment or language to
2412:
and the editorial board and authors of Journal of Symbolic computation. More seriously, this is common that it is very difficult to define a scientific field, and that the only valid definition of a scientific field is to be what the community of people working in that field think that it is. For
1542:
In response- the purpose of the Comments column would appear to be the place to put what is DIFFERENT about each tool. I tried to list some features that seemed unusual for a CAS. Also one more thing that distinguishes Mathematica from many of these systems is that it is very widely used. Some on
1228:
Do you have an example of a tool and platform that you'd like this to be the case for? I think there is too much grey area for that to be really valuable. Which distributions of Linux, BSD, and Unix would you choose to represent the answers for the rest of the column? What if something is only
929:
I just checked this list to compare Maxima, Mathomatic and Maple, and it doesn't help much. Useful comparisons might include: maximum digits precision, (or "highest integer"); some kind of benchmark, say for a big factorial or maybe factoring a given big number; number of functions; families of
3337:
I am dubious that the information about application areas can be made to work, as it seems somewhat subjective about how much each tool is used in each area. But it does seem clear to me that it is different from specific types of symbolic computation. So I have moved those recent additions into
1337:
yacas is a great example. It'd border on the ridiculous to say it was "unsupported" on all platforms. There are third-party binaries available & yacas makes efforts to ensure their C++ version is cross-platform & explicitly claim support on the platforms listed in that table. To say
1322:
You are right that there are lots of gray areas (different flavors of an OS, different hardware, extra software that some systems, amount of configuration, compiling, code hacking you need to do etc) and in the end, the page for that system is the place to put all the detailed requirements and
1537:
Cloudruns adds to the section on notes under Mathematica that Ubiquitous system also includes extensive numeric capabilities, statistics, image processing, number theory, boolean computation and is a development environment. I find it hard to believe that Ubiquitous is not a stretch of the
362: 3231:
should answers to this question, but does not, giving only a poor list of some capabilities of the CASs. Answering this question should be done using the content of the above cited books and some others. This article should also contain a short description of the main general
2203:
be completed, it may appear that the present article is useless and that a merge may be the best solution. But it is too early for a decision. For the moment, the move is not bad solution. Not also that, there is a navbox that is somehow a "list of computer algebra systems".
1278:
Personally I would take the tougher interpretation. Most people know nothing about compiling software, so those without installers should be "No*" where "*" is labelled as "The source code supplied will compile for this platform if you have an appropriate compiler"
1253:
Personally I would take the tougher interpretation. Most people know nothing about compiling software, so those without installers should be "No*" where "*" is labelled as "The source code supplied will compile for this platform if you have an appropriate compiler"
1198:
I think that the supported platforms table should indicate whether compiled executables are available or whether you have to compile it yourself. For people who do not know how to compile code, systems that do not provide pre-compiled versions, remain inaccessible.
913:
Perhaps. Although that would raise the question what the differences between various "full featured" CAS'es are. Are these programs identical? Surely not? Still, an extra column is a good idea. Maybe even more than one, if there is a desire to go into more detail.
814:
My point is that red links are there for a reason, and that weblinks given with red links are there for a reason, too, because that's what an editor would require as a minimum to be able to make a stub; I do agree with removing external links for blue links. -
2301:
From this analysis, I conclude that the software that are not recognized as CAS by the computer algebra community have not their place here either by lack of notability of by being not really a CAS. I intend to remove from the list the following software:
3062:(def.2), similarly: "The second reason for undertaking the writing of this book revolves around our interest in computer algebra system implementation. The authors are involved in the design and implementation of the MAPLE computer algebra system..." 1930:
The article does makes any hierarchy between the systems that are compared, presenting at the same level systems that are widely used in many scientific domains and confidential software that have be used only by their authors and their close friends
2781:
correct his algebra exercise should both find what they need here. They do have different requirements, though, and I think refactoring the one comprehensive table into several, perhaps according to specific feature sets, would be an improvement.
2688:
I see that the latest revert by D.Lazard has the rationale, "WP:CSC says that if the list is not complete, all entries should be notable or all entries sould be non notable." That is not what it says. Those are simply two commonly used criteria.
1480:
Furthermore, this information is included on the Knowledge pages of all of the CAS's. Including it in the List page would make it easier to do a side by side comparison, instead of having to go to each Knowledge entry for that information.
3239:. For example a section "Computer algebra in education" should contain the list (or a link to) of the hand held calculators with CA capabilities (not CAS, as IMO they are not CAS) and the mention of more elaborated programs like Algebrator. 1787:
Thank you for your comments. I have added KANT/KASH to the list of CASes just now, due to the existence of an article on it. However, I know nothing about Magnus. You can edit Knowledge too, if you want to. Everyone is welcome. :-)
3170:
I have inserted an attempt at a definition of a CAS, based on the above sources, into the lead. This would constitute the criteria for inclusion in the tables. A comment on environment: My impression from the history section in Geddes
2431:
And by "criteria", I meant criteria. Does SIGSAM say what is a CAS and what is not, or are they silent on this point? You appear to be identifying "serious" applications according to your own personal criteria, and removing the rest.
3712:
I actually went to the MATLAB website today and noticed a new revision (R2017a) since this request was made. I will mark this request as declined for now, but in the meantime, please update your request with the new version.
1476:
The same base language for the software is often the language used to interface the software with other programs and to extend the software. Therefore, this is useful information for any comparison of the different CAS's.
1675:
I do not know who you are, but if my life depended on guessing correctly whether or not you work for Wolfram Research, I would have to take my chances and say you do. Only you know whether I would be dead or alive now!
3215:, but not on a broader list. This seems the main reason why nobody gave a clear definition of what is a CAS. Moreover, if we take into account the interest of the users, I think we have to answer to several questions: 2503:
set of CAS as a whole. It is not required that the exact list in this article be identical to a list in one of those sources. I think it is also too much to ask that each entry in the list be independently notable.
2135: 70: 2450:. Ironically, no one mentioned this in the recent deletion discussion. I'm tempted to add a notability tag to the article, but I think sources do exist. You two should table your argument until you find the sources. 1655:
But where Mathematica is concerned, you go around adding as many links, as many catagories as you can think you can get away with. And of course, when I added a sentence about a free alternative, you quickly remove
962:
Even if I don't know who is Gerbrant, I also agree on this point. The only thing which currently might allow to guess the features is the last column, which is filled in in a very biased way. E.g., Mmca boasts with
899:
We could put another yes/no column titled "Full featured". This would be set to yes for full featured CASs like Maxima and Mathematica and set to no for specialized or incomplete CASs like Mathomatic and Fermat. -
3191:
compiler for user programs. And the user may not program in the implementation language, because he does not know how the data are represented and, even if he knows he does no have access to the core of the CAS.
4189:
for this product, which list new features in several releases since then. As I type this the latest release is 24.1 (as part of MathWorks release R2024a) from March 2024 as shown in the revision history of the
1943:
When I started to write this post, I had not a clear idea if the article should be improved or deleted. Reading again my post, I am now convinced that this article should be deleted and replaced by sections in
1293:
Not all Linux distributions support RPM packages out-of-the-box, though. So, as a Linux user, you MIGHT be able to use the binary RPMs, but you might not. Further: on OS X, you can get maxima binaries using
2839: 2549:
also says that clear inclusion criteria must be established in the lead. A common criterion is that all of the items be notable, but other criteria are possible. The key is to make sure that the list is not
930:
functions. (trig, calc, primes, etc.); postfix or infix notation; maximum variables per expression; highest number base; graphing (y/n); extensible; callable from other languages or programs; etc. --
2857:
says this: "e are concerned here with the use of computers for specific mathematical computations which are to be performed symbolically. This subject area is referred to by various names including
1316:
If you can get a MacOSX .dmg file then that is a "yes", even if it is odd that you have to get it from someone other than the project. Perhaps a better example is YACAS. Looking at the download page
3278:
Turning this into an article sounds like a good idea. I have been wondering whether information like the cost of a CAS belonged in an encyclopedia; but more in-depth information certainly does.
1415:
This article is more a list of computer algebra systems than a comparison. In fact, the only properties being compared are the licence and the operating system. Feature comparison is lacking.
386: 2160:
the name comparison leeds to OR problems ideally we should have up to date sources comparing the different systems. The article works for me just as list and seems to avoid the OR problems.--
672: 3617:
I am a MathWorks employee so I’m disclosing my Conflict of Interest and not making any edits myself. As such, please consider the following factual updates for the Symbolic Math Toolbox.
2355:
I suggest that a sentence be added to the article to the effect that primarily numerical software can have some computer algebra rather than not mentioning Symbolic MATLAB Toolbox at all.
42: 1045:. The consensus was that green means yes & red means no & that we aren't prescribing a value judgment. The 'but yes' and 'but no' templates were deleted for this very reason. -- 2255:
should be keep in sync as well. Note that the template has the word "Comparison" which links to this list, that link will probably need to be tweaked as well if the article is renamed.
526: 2594:
My impression is that, at the moment, everyone is arguing over entries that have their own articles, so an implied minimum requirement is that the entries be notable. Is that correct?
1543:
this page are quite obscure. The use of "ubiquitous" is somewhat CONTEXTUAL. CAS are mainly used in universities, and I am yet to see a university that does not have some Mathematica.
4201:
I have not gone through the whole list to determine if there are any other systems that have similar inconsistencies between the latest stable version and latest stable release date.
46: 2999:
to be a specific implementation with specific elements selected from among the results of the research area in order to realize a particular set of goals or features. For example,
3814:
Risa/Asir is an open source general computer algebra system. Kobe distribution is being developed by OpenXM committers. The original Risa/Asir is developed at Fujitsu Labs LTD.
443: 381: 787:
It looks like a link farm! Most other software lists don't have URLs for programs which have articles. I'll remove all these & will start to clean the external links. --
3235:
I am working in a specific field and I want to know what computer algebra may do for me and which CAS may be convenient for me. This deserve one section by relevant field in
1147:
should be listed here, it is not a system that can be run locally and it doesn't appear to do any algebra. It is only a units conversion web service as far as I can tell. --
1920:. "Computer algebra" implies the ability of doing some algebra on a computer. This excludes formula editors and software making only numerical floating point computation. 4249: 3211:
About the subject of section "What is a CAS" my opinion is that there may not be any commonly accepted definition. There may be a consensus about the two first lists in
314: 304: 4094:
Thanks for your concern. MathHandbook is not person project, is a company project by DrHuang Pty Ltd. DrHuang is the company name. how to add the item? The item can be
1558:
I do not dispute the fact that many universities will make some use of Mathematica, but it is not "ubiquitous". You have provided no evidence to support the claim that
4088: 2902: 4254: 3956: 3952: 3938: 3518: 3514: 3500: 966:
Ubiquitous system also includes extensive numeric capabilities, statistics, image processing, number theory, boolean computation and is a development environment.
4244: 1913:: Although there are published papers that compare some computer algebra systems, none is cited and the content of the article is not based of existing sources. 944:
provided. Absent such, this entry should be renamed Comparison of Platform Accessibility of Computer Algebra Systems or something less misleading like that. --
1923:
Several of the cited software are experimental software, that have not been published nor cited in scientific publications, and therefore do not satisfy the
280: 3686:
Update for Description. CAS system providing tools for solving and manipulating symbolic math expressions and performing variable-precision arithmetic.
4264: 662: 488: 2309:
Non notable software that have not been reviewed by computer algebra experts (their WP page do not give any secondary source): Mathomatic, SymbolicC++,
2230:
table give way to a list of branches of mathematics, so most entries can't be properly compared with one another on the basis of what is listed there.
2039:
but it is necessary a confidential program (otherwise how people could know of it?) and it should be considered like fringe theories and receive its
4259: 4229: 207: 197: 2541:
No, a given reference does not have to contain all the items in the list. I never said that, and the policy doesn't say that. Have another look at
1024: 462: 2733:
I hope one of D.Lazard and Yappy2bhere will take the high road and stop this edit war until clear criteria for the list have been established.
2227: 2127: 871: 765: 638: 327: 271: 248: 3466: 4274: 4239: 3885: 3575: 755: 551: 2901:
manipulations with algebraic objects on computers, and design of programming languages and environments for implementing these algorithms."
1202:
Either a (*) leading to a note, or perhaps such systems should be marked as "No" with a note "Source code should compile for this system "
4234: 4224: 1887: 1737: 1460: 1120: 225: 3247:(but would this be really a merge, as almost anything would need to be rewritten?). But it may avoid disputes on impossible definitions. 2953:
That lead seems to be a list of desirable features that can be classified as either algorithms, environment or language. Are any of them
2099:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
1640:(almost) complete implementation of..". I have edited NO OTHER maths software pages. You agree with SOME of these edits- so what is left? 4279: 3865: 1101: 434: 1425: 1076: 3365:
The functionality comparison table has some errors, for example Wolfram "Mathematica" does have probability and tensorial calculus.
1861:
That probably was a wise decision, but a lot of work, there are too many columns already. Thank you Asmeurer for a job well done! --
4284: 4269: 4202: 3934:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
3372: 2252: 1496: 999: 629: 590: 415: 2874: 4185:
the latest stable version as being part of release R2018a there have been several stable releases since 2018. See as a source the
3329:(3.8) | $ 0 | class="db-ZnJlZSB0YWJsZQ"|Free | collegiate, semi compat Matlab: alg, cntrl theory, audio, imaging, linux, more. |- 3908: 3438: 3357: 2139: 2131: 1775: 867: 731: 38: 3598: 507: 2306:
Not really CAS: Euler Math Toolbox, Mathomatic (teaching software), Symbolic MATLAB Toolbox, TI-Nspire CAS (Computer Software)
4114: 4048: 4033:
computer algebra system MathHandbook for free was added, but someone removed it without evidence many times. so a case open.
3924: 3608: 3266: 1848: 1822: 1720: 1299: 1386:
To me it would be impossible to add this binary/source idea properly, since for many pieces of software, there are binaries
1341:
There is no NPOV definition of a "typical" linux/bsd/unix that I am aware of. I wouldn't consider compilation "alteration."
2446:
The root problem here is that no sources are provided for the list as a whole. This is required for a list to satisfy the
1391:
more popular platforms are likely to be created quicker than those for less popular platforms. Perhaps just a link to the
847:
still needs to be cleaned up with descriptions & possibly a few more can be removed--they are somewhat redundant.) --
821: 164: 125: 3858:
Is there a good reason why Geogebra (now supporting CAS) is not listed? It's very easy to use and runs very stable now.
4169: 3999: 1217: 472: 353: 100: 1319:
there is ONLY source code. It gets ticks in every platform when you can't actually get it ready to use on any platform.
2554:. Since there is disagreement about what should go in the list, the criteria should probably be discussed here first. 2385:
allows some formula manipulation" a sillier definition than the diffuse "what the specialists think of as a CAS"? Who
1699: 727: 723: 718: 695: 482: 396: 3298:
I think that MuPad (which is now a Matlab symbolic toolbox) has the equation editor. Would you mind to double-check?
2050:
has been inserted by the author of the WP article, which has the same name as the author of the software. Is it not
517: 279:
related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2005:; believing that intuition can tell you who wrote the program and who uses it in the absence of other evidence is 2090: 2058: 2057:
3- Sure that notability does not requires publication in a scientific journal. But for scientific questions, the
2032: 544: 66: 3955:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
3836:
The Java Algebra System (JAS) is an object oriented, type safe and multi-threaded approach to computer algebra.
3517:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
3392:
I believe that this page should list only systems that provide some computer algebra capabilities of their own.
2834:
is a more recent area of computer science, where mathematical tools and computer software are developed for the
4139: 4062: 3889: 3579: 3091: 2644:
is of questionable notability, but there is certainly enough independently verifiable information to list it.
2551: 2251:
prefers "List of" to "Comparison of". Renaming seems like a good approach to deal with OR concerns. Seems like
1945: 1612:
Others have commented in your talk page about you adding Mathematica to categories which are not very relevant.
1891: 1741: 1464: 1124: 839:, which had no external link. I rmed URLs for bluelinked articles & the dead/foreign/off-topic URLs from 3869: 3990: 3916: 3604: 3283: 3244: 3236: 3228: 3180: 3146: 2962: 2933: 2923: 2827: 2738: 2694: 2599: 2559: 2473: 2455: 2378: 2199: 1429: 1105: 4206: 3640:
Cost $ 3,150 (Commercial), $ 99 (Student Suite), $ 700 (Academic), $ 194 (Home) Including required MATLAB (
3467:
http://web.archive.org/web/20051105092120/http://directory.google.com:80/Top/Science/Math/Algebra/Software/
3376: 2640:
information but not necessarily independent notability seems appropriate to me. For example, I think that
17: 3912: 3783: 1268:
Probably quite a few of them. But lets look at Maxima as an example. If you look at the download pages...
1243:
Probably quite a few of them. But lets look at Maxima as an example. If you look at the download pages...
1080: 156: 4019: 1665: 1645: 1624: 1617: 1602: 1583: 1548: 4084: 4071:
Knowledge is not the place to promote or advertise one's personal projects. We base our content on what
3974:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
3962: 3556: 3536:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
3524: 3099: 2908: 2880: 2845: 2787: 2649: 2508: 2437: 2394: 2283: 2235: 2186: 2100: 2014: 1515: 1492: 1003: 915: 453: 106: 3915:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 615: 1488: 4157: 4102: 4036: 3861: 3574:
It would be very nice to have a better license and fee sorting. Could anyone do this task? Thanks, --
3491: 3420: 3416: 3400: 3368: 3353: 3345: 3254: 2165: 2147: 1974: 1771: 1767: 1763: 1708: 1484: 1421: 1205: 1097: 1091:
Isn't MATLAB symbolic toolbox equal to Maple? However, it could be mentioned and referenced to Maple
1072: 1032: 995: 949: 1661: 1641: 1620: 1598: 1579: 1544: 59: 4135: 4058: 3794: 3766: 3741: 3707: 3689: 3620: 1677: 1511: 1396: 4191: 2777:
I too prefer a more inclusive list. The CERN physicist and the middle school student who wants to
637:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
4110: 4044: 3844: 3822: 3770: 3748: 3693: 3624: 3470: 3279: 3262: 3196: 3176: 3142: 2958: 2944: 2919: 2734: 2690: 2595: 2555: 2469: 2451: 2422: 2342: 2322: 2260: 2248: 2223: 2208: 2069: 1963: 1866: 1842: 1816: 1793: 1716: 1681: 1400: 1350: 1307: 1234: 1181: 1152: 1050: 621: 3959:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
3740:
I made the updates, only the release version and date have changed. Please make the edits now.
3521:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1808:
It seems like the open source column is not needed, given that there is also a license column.
605: 584: 4210: 4173: 4143: 4066: 4023: 4004: 3975: 3893: 3873: 3848: 3826: 3801: 3774: 3752: 3725: 3697: 3583: 3564: 3537: 3424: 3404: 3380: 3307: 3287: 3270: 3200: 3184: 3150: 3103: 2966: 2948: 2927: 2912: 2884: 2849: 2791: 2742: 2698: 2653: 2603: 2563: 2512: 2477: 2459: 2441: 2426: 2398: 2364: 2346: 2326: 2264: 2239: 2212: 2190: 2169: 2151: 2121: 2073: 2018: 1989:
of the proposal that this be a list and not a comparison at all. Third, "fringe software" is a
1967: 1895: 1870: 1855: 1829: 1797: 1779: 1745: 1724: 1685: 1669: 1649: 1628: 1606: 1587: 1552: 1519: 1500: 1468: 1448: 1433: 1404: 1369: 1354: 1332: 1311: 1288: 1263: 1238: 1221: 1185: 1171: 1156: 1128: 1109: 1084: 1054: 1036: 1018: 1007: 978: 953: 934: 918: 904: 893: 878: 851: 826: 809: 791: 3721: 3448: 2542: 2447: 2360: 2117: 1042: 372: 4186: 1272: 1247: 4165: 4123: 4080: 3552: 3303: 3220: 3095: 2904: 2876: 2841: 2783: 2645: 2504: 2433: 2390: 2231: 2182: 2028: 2010: 2006: 1932: 1917: 1365: 1328: 1284: 1259: 1213: 1167: 1015: 424: 276: 3982: 3881: 3544: 2064:
I confirm that the article has multiple issues even after the cleanup that I have started.
832: 798: 3925:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120415021413/http://www.symbolicnet.org/systems/Systems.html
3456: 3396: 3349: 2161: 2143: 1028: 945: 173: 3395:
I don't know if this stretched definition is an issue for any other systems on this page.
1985:. Second, your complaint that the article compares apples and oranges is moot given your 1473:
A Column should be added for the Programming Language in which the Software was written.
1115:
Past versions of MATLAB used Maple in the symbolic toolbox. Some years ago they moved to
2983:
without explicitly defining it. The third is a collection of Maple routines; it defines
835:'s removal was a mistake & thanks for fixing it. The only other redlink I rmed was 140: 119: 4127: 4072: 4015: 3941:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 3789: 3683:
Updates for Operating System SaaS - Yes; available on MATLAB Mobile and MATLAB Online
3503:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 2051: 2002: 1994: 1936: 874:? I'd propose moving the article, as the "comparion" is a more accurate description. -- 498: 340: 3981:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
3543:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
2464:
Also, clear selection criteria for items in this list should be included in the lead (
1958:
template), explaining why there are important and summarizing their main abilities. --
363:
Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
4218: 4106: 4040: 3840: 3818: 3258: 3192: 2940: 2546: 2465: 2418: 2414: 2338: 2318: 2256: 2204: 2065: 2040: 1959: 1952: 1924: 1862: 1836: 1810: 1789: 1712: 1445: 1346: 1303: 1230: 1177: 1148: 1046: 975: 901: 890: 875: 848: 806: 788: 3243:
This project would imply to rewrite many things, probably to merge this article and
3175:
is that there is always at least an interpreter or translator for the CAS language.
2031:. I have used it to say briefly that if a software is not mentioned in any reliable 1736:
I belive Maxima has formula editor capabilities via TeX export (see tex() function)
4131: 4076: 3760: 3735: 3714: 2854: 2356: 2273: 2178: 2113: 2036: 2035:
and has never been presented to any conference on the subject, then it is not only
1978: 1910: 1755:
If the list inlcudes Pari/GP then it should also inlcude Kash/Kant available here:
1574:
more sought after in the job market). So why did you not say the same about MATLAB?
1094:
It is a very old version of Maple, so it is not accurate to say that it is equal.
816: 802: 3928: 2636:
I for one would prefer to see a more inclusive list. CAS for which there is some
4198:
while its latest stable release date is a year and a half earlier, 29 June 2022.
1597:
NO I used wolfram ONLINE DOCUMENTATION as CITATIONS to TWO edits. No other links.
4161: 3948: 3510: 3299: 2637: 2335: 2226:. Although the guideline permits the current name, well-defined features in the 1998: 1756: 1563: 1559: 1530: 1361: 1324: 1280: 1255: 1209: 1163: 634: 4122:
Are you unpaid (as you've said elsewhere), or working on behalf of a company?
3947:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 3509:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 3322: 3318: 2641: 2282:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
2047: 1269: 1244: 805:
added it back with the comment "slash and burn stinks." Please elaborate. --
611: 216: 146: 3212: 2975:
Yes, that's right. The first two are computer algebra textbooks; both define
1660:
NO I DIDNT. I changed the wording, but I left the link to YOUR SAGE software.
1317: 1990: 1982: 1418:
I suggest the article to be renamed in "List of computer algebra systems".
710: 689: 405: 3880:
It is listed now. Anyway, Geogebra is NOT free (and that is the reason why
1338:
otherwise would seem to be projecting an bias against source distributions.
263: 242: 3224:
to know that something exists, even if one do not know what it is exactly)
2410: 2046:
2- I never added any program to this article. On the other hand the entry
2389:
these specialists, and what is their criteria (with references, please)?
1441: 1162:
I agree. Online is OK, but a units converter is not a CAS. I will remove
971: 3453:
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add
2897:. Its research focuses on the development of algorithms for performing 2061:
are usually the scientific publications, even if some are not reliable.
1935:|fringe software]]). Therefore the article does not satisfy the policy 1759:
Moreover the system Magnus for infinite group theory is also missing.
1440:
See above for request of & discussion about "feature comparison".—
931: 3837: 3597: 2403:
Among the specialists of computer algebra one may cite the members of
2136:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Comparison of computer algebra systems
3815: 2404: 1567: 169: 3341:
The English also needs some clean-up. 09:52, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
3207:
Proposition of restructuring the 3 main articles on computer algebra
1834:
I wen't ahead and removed it. If you disagree, please discuss here.
1562:
it is very widely used. (Based on the number of job adds requiring
3649: 3461:
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
1116: 1295: 4134:
sources stands, regardless of the ownership of the software.
4097:
MathHandbbok DrHuang Pty Ltd Free CAS for fractional calculus
3592: 3471:
http://directory.google.com/Top/Science/Math/Algebra/Software/
2334:
I did a mistake: Sympy is notable, being a subpackage of GAGE
1529:
The following comment by drkirkby moved from the TALK page of
1014:
I agree (in fact came to the talk page to say the same thing)
481:
Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see
82: 54: 26: 2181:
can be found addressing the "comparison" part of the title.
4180:
Out of date "Latest stable release date" for several systems
3476:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
1977:
but isn't a requirement. To claim that the article is "pure
215: 3919:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
3141:
seem to define computer algebra system mainly by example.
1882: 1455:
Please add comparison for the language of the CAS systems.
730:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the 37:
The old history of this article before it was merged with
1973:
First, mention in a scientific journal can contribute to
1566:
skills, I suggest it is not as widely used as you claim.
3437:
I have just added archive links to one external link on
2407: 2089:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
1704:
Technical word processing including formula editing...
1507:
Needs a column to indicate whether there is a GUI or not
3442: 2937: 1916:
Several of the cited softwares have nothing to do with
2830:
in almost every pub I've looked at. I did find this: "
3786:
applies here, especially with the listing of prices.
3641: 3219:
What is computer algebra? This should be answered in
2272:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
1948:, presenting the main computer algebra systems (with 1593:
You add links to numerous Wolfram Research web sites.
1144: 889:
to the pastel green and red in the adjacent column.
633:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 275:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 3951:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 3513:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 2103:. No further edits should be made to this section. 3387:Removed ScaViz - internal vs external capabilities 2286:. No further edits should be made to this section. 2138:. There were three people in support of moving to 387:Computer science articles needing expert attention 2822:I'm looking for definitions, RockMagnetist, but 1578:MATLAB is NOT a CAS. MATLAB is NOT on this page. 3929:http://www.symbolicnet.org/systems/Systems.html 3937:This message was posted before February 2018. 3499:This message was posted before February 2018. 2373:Seems to me that symbolic manipulation is the 527:WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs 1757:http://page.math.tu-berlin.de/~kant/kash.html 8: 4014:Scilab remove the symbolic functions it had 2142:do we have a general consensus for the move. 1691:You would be UNWISE to bet your life on it. 1069:It is one of the most popular CAS systems. 168:, which collaborates on articles related to 2932:... and some other things, see the lead of 2889:"CAS is an interdisciplinary area between 722:, an attempt to structure and organize all 444:Computer science articles without infoboxes 382:Computer science articles needing attention 45:, and the old talk history can be found at 18:Talk:Comparison of computer algebra systems 3907:I have just modified one external link on 3859: 2317:Do I have made some mistake in this list? 2001:program of your own design to the list is 1482: 684: 579: 348:Here are some tasks awaiting attention: 322: 237: 114: 88: 86: 3029:interpreted library, user interface..." . 1993:, your own invention. I believe you want 4250:Low-importance Computer science articles 2409:, the participants of ISSAC conferences 726:. If you wish to help, please visit the 69:on 3 November 2012 (UTC). The result of 2545:, if you haven't already. However, the 1025:Talk:Comparison_of_statistical_packages 866:Is there any reason this was merged to 686: 581: 239: 116: 4154:PDE could be a comparison criteria ! 3410:Discrepancy between Maxima and Macsyma 2128:Comparison of computer algebra systems 1804:Is the "Open source" column necessary? 872:comparison of computer algebra systems 289:Knowledge:WikiProject Computer science 4255:WikiProject Computer science articles 3589:Updates for the Symbolic Math Toolbox 3488:to let others know (documentation at 3227:What I can do with computer algebra? 2547:manual of style for stand-alone lists 2413:example, if you assert that 2+2=4 is 292:Template:WikiProject Computer science 7: 4245:List-Class Computer science articles 4057:2014. (visible in the page history) 3765:Hi, can these edits please be made? 3294:Correction - Matlab symbolic toolbox 2337:. This is a valid secondary source. 2108:The result of the move request was: 1700:Sage (mathematics software)#Features 716:This article is within the scope of 627:This article is within the scope of 269:This article is within the scope of 224:This article is within the field of 162:This article is within the scope of 3838:http://krum.rz.uni-mannheim.de/jas/ 2957:for a system to be considered CAS? 1986: 1345:would warrant yet another table. -- 105:It is of interest to the following 3816:http://www.math.kobe-u.ac.jp/Asir/ 2381:. Why exactly is "a software that 1905:This article has multiple issues: 1065:Please add MATLAB Symbolic Toolbox 463:Timeline of computing 2020–present 25: 4265:Low-priority mathematics articles 3911:. Please take a moment to review 3642:https://en.m.wikipedia.org/MATLAB 3441:. Please take a moment to review 2253:Template:Computer algebra systems 1023:The same complaint is current at 647:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics 489:Computing articles needing images 3909:List of computer algebra systems 3884:) -- so the table is incorrect. 3654:Updates for Functionality table 3596: 3439:List of computer algebra systems 2140:List of computer algebra systems 2132:List of computer algebra systems 2027:1- I have not invented the page 868:list of computer algebra systems 709: 688: 650:Template:WikiProject Mathematics 614: 604: 583: 339: 262: 241: 149: 139: 118: 87: 58: 39:List of computer algebra systems 30: 4260:List-Class mathematics articles 4230:Low-importance Systems articles 3650:https://www.mathworks.com/store 3630:Updates for the General table 1751:Kash/KANT and Magnus not listed 760:This article has been rated as 667:This article has been rated as 309:This article has been rated as 202:This article has been rated as 65:This article was nominated for 1: 4192:user's guide for this product 4005:13:45, 29 December 2017 (UTC) 3894:17:03, 25 February 2023 (UTC) 3405:10:51, 12 November 2014 (UTC) 3288:22:08, 18 November 2012 (UTC) 3271:10:18, 18 November 2012 (UTC) 3201:09:17, 18 November 2012 (UTC) 3185:02:03, 18 November 2012 (UTC) 3151:00:42, 18 November 2012 (UTC) 3104:23:31, 17 November 2012 (UTC) 2995:to be the research area, and 2967:23:00, 17 November 2012 (UTC) 2949:22:50, 17 November 2012 (UTC) 2928:22:35, 17 November 2012 (UTC) 2913:22:17, 17 November 2012 (UTC) 2885:19:48, 17 November 2012 (UTC) 2850:18:44, 17 November 2012 (UTC) 2792:18:49, 17 November 2012 (UTC) 2743:17:44, 17 November 2012 (UTC) 2699:17:42, 17 November 2012 (UTC) 2654:16:55, 17 November 2012 (UTC) 2604:16:41, 17 November 2012 (UTC) 2564:16:28, 17 November 2012 (UTC) 2513:12:04, 17 November 2012 (UTC) 2478:16:55, 16 November 2012 (UTC) 2460:16:52, 16 November 2012 (UTC) 2448:notability criteria for lists 2442:02:03, 13 November 2012 (UTC) 2427:00:24, 13 November 2012 (UTC) 2399:19:33, 12 November 2012 (UTC) 2365:17:30, 12 November 2012 (UTC) 2347:16:51, 13 November 2012 (UTC) 2327:11:30, 12 November 2012 (UTC) 2265:06:43, 15 November 2012 (UTC) 2240:03:08, 13 November 2012 (UTC) 2213:18:13, 11 November 2012 (UTC) 2191:17:52, 11 November 2012 (UTC) 2170:17:24, 11 November 2012 (UTC) 2152:17:24, 11 November 2012 (UTC) 2122:14:18, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 2074:23:55, 12 November 2012 (UTC) 2019:20:53, 12 November 2012 (UTC) 1520:20:06, 12 November 2008 (UTC) 1019:21:49, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 954:17:45, 11 December 2008 (UTC) 935:06:19, 6 September 2007 (UTC) 879:19:13, 26 November 2006 (UTC) 641:and see a list of open tasks. 543:Tag all relevant articles in 283:and see a list of open tasks. 182:Knowledge:WikiProject Systems 4275:Low-importance List articles 4240:WikiProject Systems articles 4024:14:10, 22 January 2018 (UTC) 3882:it is not included in Debian 3849:15:21, 30 January 2017 (UTC) 3827:16:52, 29 January 2017 (UTC) 3425:10:50, 1 November 2015 (UTC) 3250:Comments on such a project? 2991:without defining it. I read 1968:17:04, 3 November 2012 (UTC) 1925:General notability guideline 1896:03:18, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 1871:21:07, 20 October 2012 (UTC) 1856:15:10, 19 October 2012 (UTC) 1830:15:04, 19 October 2012 (UTC) 1129:13:03, 10 January 2016 (UTC) 1110:13:26, 9 February 2014 (UTC) 1085:05:39, 26 January 2008 (UTC) 1008:17:03, 8 November 2007 (UTC) 852:02:09, 26 January 2006 (UTC) 827:01:43, 26 January 2006 (UTC) 810:01:27, 26 January 2006 (UTC) 797:oops--had accidentally rmed 792:23:57, 25 January 2006 (UTC) 552:WikiProject Computer science 328:WikiProject Computer science 272:WikiProject Computer science 185:Template:WikiProject Systems 4235:Systems articles in systems 4225:List-Class Systems articles 3874:07:53, 8 October 2017 (UTC) 3802:23:49, 5 January 2018 (UTC) 3775:20:09, 5 January 2018 (UTC) 3753:11:35, 16 August 2017 (UTC) 3664:Diophantine equations - Yes 2134:– Following the closure of 1798:13:58, 2 October 2011 (UTC) 1780:10:57, 2 October 2011 (UTC) 1469:21:39, 27 August 2008 (UTC) 740:Knowledge:WikiProject Lists 483:List of computer scientists 4301: 4280:WikiProject Lists articles 3968:(last update: 5 June 2024) 3904:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 3726:01:06, 1 August 2017 (UTC) 3698:19:53, 29 March 2017 (UTC) 3648:You can verify pricing at 3584:15:33, 16 April 2016 (UTC) 3565:05:10, 21 March 2016 (UTC) 3530:(last update: 5 June 2024) 3459:|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} 3434:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 1746:16:46, 3 August 2011 (UTC) 1055:17:44, 28 April 2008 (UTC) 1041:We had this discussion at 1037:16:36, 28 April 2008 (UTC) 919:23:59, 28 March 2007 (UTC) 905:03:53, 17 March 2007 (UTC) 894:19:35, 14 March 2007 (UTC) 862:Title: list vs. comparison 766:project's importance scale 743:Template:WikiProject Lists 315:project's importance scale 208:project's importance scale 4211:17:54, 30 July 2024 (UTC) 4144:13:31, 19 July 2021 (UTC) 4089:16:40, 18 July 2021 (UTC) 4067:15:57, 18 July 2021 (UTC) 1686:01:33, 23 June 2009 (UTC) 1670:12:42, 25 June 2009 (UTC) 1650:12:42, 25 June 2009 (UTC) 1629:12:42, 25 June 2009 (UTC) 1607:12:42, 25 June 2009 (UTC) 1588:12:42, 25 June 2009 (UTC) 1553:17:44, 18 June 2009 (UTC) 1501:00:02, 24 July 2020 (UTC) 1449:16:16, 7 March 2009 (UTC) 1434:13:12, 15 July 2008 (UTC) 1405:12:59, 23 June 2009 (UTC) 979:16:14, 7 March 2009 (UTC) 759: 704: 666: 599: 545:Category:Computer science 321: 308: 295:Computer science articles 257: 223: 201: 134: 113: 4285:Declined requested edits 4270:List-Class List articles 4079:references have to say. 3381:22:31, 17 May 2014 (UTC) 3308:15:41, 28 May 2013 (UTC) 2936:that has been reverted ( 2838:solution of equations." 2828:defined like pornography 2279:Please do not modify it. 2096:Please do not modify it. 1946:computer algebra systems 1725:11:50, 27 May 2010 (UTC) 1370:10:37, 9 June 2008 (UTC) 1355:16:55, 6 June 2008 (UTC) 1333:15:47, 6 June 2008 (UTC) 1312:13:02, 6 June 2008 (UTC) 1289:09:38, 6 June 2008 (UTC) 1264:09:38, 6 June 2008 (UTC) 1239:01:20, 6 June 2008 (UTC) 1222:11:14, 5 June 2008 (UTC) 1186:00:28, 6 June 2008 (UTC) 1172:11:16, 5 June 2008 (UTC) 1157:10:52, 31 May 2008 (UTC) 673:project's priority scale 547:and sub-categories with 4174:02:31, 6 May 2022 (UTC) 4010:Remove Scilab from list 3900:External links modified 3854:Geogebra CAS not listed 3637:Release March 8th, 2017 3430:External links modified 3245:computer algebra system 3237:computer algebra system 3229:Computer algebra system 2997:computer algebra system 2985:computer algebra system 2981:computer algebra system 2934:computer algebra system 2824:Computer Algebra System 2379:computer algebra system 2200:computer algebra system 1883:http://www.mathics.net/ 1881:Please add Mathics < 724:list pages on Knowledge 630:WikiProject Mathematics 3092:This merger discussion 2859:algebraic manipulation 1395:page would be better. 1298:. It is also part of 968: 508:Computer science stubs 220: 157:Systems science portal 95:This article is rated 3673:Boolean Algebra - Yes 1732:Maxima Formula editor 1176:Good job, thanks! -- 964: 219: 3949:regular verification 3810:Risa/Asir not listed 3679:Control Theory - Yes 3658:Formula editor - Yes 3609:conflict of interest 3607:by an editor with a 3511:regular verification 3445:. If necessary, add 2867:algebraic algorithms 2863:symbolic computation 2468:provides examples). 992:side or the other. 653:mathematics articles 326:Things you can help 43:/Old article history 4126:'s statement about 3939:After February 2018 3670:Number Theory - Yes 3501:After February 2018 3480:parameter below to 2177:unless and until a 1618:User_talk:Cloudruns 1194:Supported platforms 987:Color coding is POV 884:Feature comparison? 165:WikiProject Systems 3993:InternetArchiveBot 3944:InternetArchiveBot 3667:Graph Theory - Yes 3661:Inequalities - Yes 3506:InternetArchiveBot 3415:discrepancy here. 2873:, to name a few." 2780: 2384: 1863:George Gesslein II 1790:George Gesslein II 1178:George Gesslein II 1149:George Gesslein II 622:Mathematics portal 221: 101:content assessment 4160:comment added by 4105:comment added by 4039:comment added by 3969: 3876: 3864:comment added by 3676:Probability - Yes 3615: 3614: 3563: 3531: 3371:comment added by 3362: 3348:comment added by 3338:their own table. 3333:Application areas 3274: 3257:comment added by 2778: 2382: 2037:original research 1783: 1766:comment added by 1728: 1711:comment added by 1503: 1487:comment added by 1436: 1424:comment added by 1224: 1208:comment added by 1100:comment added by 1087: 1075:comment added by 1043:Template talk:Yes 1010: 998:comment added by 780: 779: 776: 775: 772: 771: 719:WikiProject Lists 683: 682: 679: 678: 578: 577: 574: 573: 570: 569: 566: 565: 236: 235: 232: 231: 81: 80: 53: 52: 47:/Old talk history 16:(Redirected from 4292: 4176: 4150:Another criteria 4118: 4052: 4003: 3994: 3967: 3966: 3945: 3799: 3797: 3792: 3764: 3746: 3739: 3719: 3711: 3600: 3593: 3559: 3558:Talk to my owner 3554: 3529: 3528: 3507: 3495: 3460: 3452: 3383: 3361: 3342: 3328: 3325:| 1997 | 1997 | 3273: 3251: 3221:computer algebra 3094:seems relevant. 2993:computer algebra 2989:computer algebra 2977:computer algebra 2918:implement them? 2895:Computer Science 2871:computer algebra 2832:Computer algebra 2281: 2098: 2059:reliable sources 1957: 1951: 1918:computer algebra 1854: 1851: 1845: 1839: 1828: 1825: 1819: 1813: 1782: 1760: 1727: 1705: 1635:are right here). 1616:NO they haven't 1525:Comments section 1419: 1411:Not a comparison 1203: 1112: 1070: 993: 824: 748: 747: 744: 741: 738: 713: 706: 705: 700: 692: 685: 655: 654: 651: 648: 645: 624: 619: 618: 608: 601: 600: 595: 587: 580: 556: 550: 425:Computer science 354:Article requests 343: 336: 335: 323: 297: 296: 293: 290: 287: 286:Computer science 277:Computer science 266: 259: 258: 253: 249:Computer science 245: 238: 190: 189: 188:Systems articles 186: 183: 180: 159: 154: 153: 152: 143: 136: 135: 130: 122: 115: 98: 92: 91: 90: 83: 62: 55: 41:can be found at 34: 33: 27: 21: 4300: 4299: 4295: 4294: 4293: 4291: 4290: 4289: 4215: 4214: 4182: 4155: 4152: 4100: 4098: 4034: 4031: 4012: 3997: 3992: 3960: 3953:have permission 3943: 3917:this simple FaQ 3902: 3886:189.120.197.171 3856: 3834: 3812: 3795: 3790: 3788: 3784:WP:NOTCATALOGUE 3758: 3745:(Jalen D. Folf) 3744: 3733: 3718:(Jalen D. Folf) 3717: 3705: 3628: 3591: 3576:217.237.164.210 3572: 3562: 3557: 3522: 3515:have permission 3505: 3489: 3454: 3446: 3432: 3412: 3389: 3366: 3343: 3335: 3326: 3315: 3296: 3252: 3213:SIGSAM software 3209: 2295: 2290: 2277: 2247:as noted above 2179:reliable source 2094: 2084: 2033:reliable source 1997:. Adding a non- 1955: 1949: 1903: 1901:Multiple issues 1879: 1849: 1843: 1837: 1835: 1823: 1817: 1811: 1809: 1806: 1761: 1753: 1734: 1706: 1697: 1527: 1509: 1457: 1413: 1196: 1141: 1095: 1067: 989: 886: 870:rather than to 864: 841:External links. 837:Algebra Solved! 831:Yes--I agree. 825: 820: 785: 745: 742: 739: 736: 735: 698: 652: 649: 646: 643: 642: 620: 613: 593: 562: 559: 554: 548: 536:Project-related 531: 512: 493: 467: 448: 429: 410: 391: 367: 294: 291: 288: 285: 284: 251: 187: 184: 181: 178: 177: 174:systems science 155: 150: 148: 128: 99:on Knowledge's 96: 31: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 4298: 4296: 4288: 4287: 4282: 4277: 4272: 4267: 4262: 4257: 4252: 4247: 4242: 4237: 4232: 4227: 4217: 4216: 4181: 4178: 4151: 4148: 4147: 4146: 4136:Russ Woodroofe 4096: 4092: 4091: 4069: 4059:Russ Woodroofe 4030: 4027: 4011: 4008: 3987: 3986: 3979: 3932: 3931: 3923:Added archive 3901: 3898: 3897: 3896: 3855: 3852: 3833: 3832:JAS not listed 3830: 3811: 3808: 3807: 3806: 3805: 3804: 3756: 3755: 3729: 3728: 3681: 3680: 3677: 3674: 3671: 3668: 3665: 3662: 3659: 3646: 3645: 3638: 3635: 3634:Version R2017a 3619: 3613: 3612: 3601: 3590: 3587: 3571: 3570:Better sorting 3568: 3555: 3549: 3548: 3541: 3474: 3473: 3465:Added archive 3431: 3428: 3411: 3408: 3388: 3385: 3334: 3331: 3314: 3311: 3295: 3292: 3291: 3290: 3241: 3240: 3233: 3225: 3208: 3205: 3204: 3203: 3168: 3167: 3166: 3165: 3164: 3163: 3162: 3161: 3160: 3159: 3158: 3157: 3156: 3155: 3154: 3153: 3119: 3118: 3117: 3116: 3115: 3114: 3113: 3112: 3111: 3110: 3109: 3108: 3107: 3106: 3076: 3075: 3074: 3073: 3072: 3071: 3070: 3069: 3068: 3067: 3066: 3065: 3064: 3063: 3043: 3042: 3041: 3040: 3039: 3038: 3037: 3036: 3035: 3034: 3033: 3032: 3031: 3030: 3013: 3012: 3011: 3010: 3009: 3008: 3007: 3006: 3005: 3004: 3003: 3002: 3001: 3000: 2973: 2972: 2971: 2970: 2969: 2887: 2852: 2809: 2808: 2807: 2806: 2805: 2804: 2803: 2802: 2801: 2800: 2799: 2798: 2797: 2796: 2795: 2794: 2760: 2759: 2758: 2757: 2756: 2755: 2754: 2753: 2752: 2751: 2750: 2749: 2748: 2747: 2746: 2745: 2716: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2710: 2709: 2708: 2707: 2706: 2705: 2704: 2703: 2702: 2701: 2671: 2670: 2669: 2668: 2667: 2666: 2665: 2664: 2663: 2662: 2661: 2660: 2659: 2658: 2657: 2656: 2619: 2618: 2617: 2616: 2615: 2614: 2613: 2612: 2611: 2610: 2609: 2608: 2607: 2606: 2579: 2578: 2577: 2576: 2575: 2574: 2573: 2572: 2571: 2570: 2569: 2568: 2567: 2566: 2552:indiscriminate 2526: 2525: 2524: 2523: 2522: 2521: 2520: 2519: 2518: 2517: 2516: 2515: 2489: 2488: 2487: 2486: 2485: 2484: 2483: 2482: 2481: 2480: 2462: 2368: 2367: 2352: 2351: 2350: 2349: 2315: 2314: 2307: 2294: 2293:What is a CAS? 2291: 2289: 2288: 2274:requested move 2268: 2267: 2242: 2215: 2193: 2172: 2125: 2106: 2105: 2091:requested move 2085: 2083: 2082:Requested Move 2080: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2062: 2055: 2044: 2022: 2021: 1987:tacit approval 1941: 1940: 1928: 1921: 1914: 1902: 1899: 1888:69.140.204.143 1878: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1805: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1752: 1749: 1738:149.244.249.60 1733: 1730: 1696: 1693: 1689: 1688: 1658: 1657: 1637: 1636: 1614: 1613: 1595: 1594: 1576: 1575: 1540: 1539: 1526: 1523: 1508: 1505: 1461:79.111.104.100 1456: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1412: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1342: 1339: 1320: 1276: 1251: 1195: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1143:I don't think 1140: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1121:93.232.252.137 1066: 1063: 1062: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1058: 1057: 988: 985: 984: 983: 982: 981: 957: 956: 940: 939: 938: 937: 924: 923: 922: 921: 908: 907: 885: 882: 863: 860: 859: 858: 857: 856: 855: 854: 845:External links 819: 784: 783:Too many links 781: 778: 777: 774: 773: 770: 769: 762:Low-importance 758: 752: 751: 749: 714: 702: 701: 699:Low‑importance 693: 681: 680: 677: 676: 665: 659: 658: 656: 639:the discussion 626: 625: 609: 597: 596: 588: 576: 575: 572: 571: 568: 567: 564: 563: 561: 560: 558: 557: 540: 532: 530: 529: 523: 513: 511: 510: 504: 494: 492: 491: 486: 478: 468: 466: 465: 459: 449: 447: 446: 440: 430: 428: 427: 421: 411: 409: 408: 402: 392: 390: 389: 384: 378: 368: 366: 365: 359: 347: 345: 344: 332: 331: 319: 318: 311:Low-importance 307: 301: 300: 298: 281:the discussion 267: 255: 254: 252:Low‑importance 246: 234: 233: 230: 229: 222: 212: 211: 204:Low-importance 200: 194: 193: 191: 161: 160: 144: 132: 131: 129:Low‑importance 123: 111: 110: 104: 93: 79: 78: 71:the discussion 63: 51: 50: 35: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4297: 4286: 4283: 4281: 4278: 4276: 4273: 4271: 4268: 4266: 4263: 4261: 4258: 4256: 4253: 4251: 4248: 4246: 4243: 4241: 4238: 4236: 4233: 4231: 4228: 4226: 4223: 4222: 4220: 4213: 4212: 4208: 4204: 4199: 4195: 4193: 4188: 4187:Release Notes 4179: 4177: 4175: 4171: 4167: 4163: 4159: 4149: 4145: 4141: 4137: 4133: 4129: 4125: 4121: 4120: 4119: 4116: 4112: 4108: 4104: 4095: 4090: 4086: 4082: 4078: 4074: 4070: 4068: 4064: 4060: 4055: 4054: 4053: 4050: 4046: 4042: 4038: 4028: 4026: 4025: 4021: 4017: 4009: 4007: 4006: 4001: 3996: 3995: 3984: 3980: 3977: 3973: 3972: 3971: 3964: 3958: 3954: 3950: 3946: 3940: 3935: 3930: 3926: 3922: 3921: 3920: 3918: 3914: 3910: 3905: 3899: 3895: 3891: 3887: 3883: 3879: 3878: 3877: 3875: 3871: 3867: 3866:178.82.120.81 3863: 3853: 3851: 3850: 3846: 3842: 3839: 3831: 3829: 3828: 3824: 3820: 3817: 3809: 3803: 3800: 3798: 3793: 3785: 3781: 3780: 3779: 3778: 3777: 3776: 3772: 3768: 3762: 3754: 3750: 3743: 3737: 3731: 3730: 3727: 3723: 3716: 3709: 3703: 3702: 3701: 3699: 3695: 3691: 3687: 3684: 3678: 3675: 3672: 3669: 3666: 3663: 3660: 3657: 3656: 3655: 3652: 3651: 3643: 3639: 3636: 3633: 3632: 3631: 3626: 3622: 3618: 3611:was declined. 3610: 3606: 3602: 3599: 3595: 3594: 3588: 3586: 3585: 3581: 3577: 3569: 3567: 3566: 3560: 3553: 3546: 3542: 3539: 3535: 3534: 3533: 3526: 3520: 3516: 3512: 3508: 3502: 3497: 3493: 3487: 3483: 3479: 3472: 3468: 3464: 3463: 3462: 3458: 3450: 3444: 3440: 3435: 3429: 3427: 3426: 3422: 3418: 3409: 3407: 3406: 3402: 3398: 3393: 3386: 3384: 3382: 3378: 3374: 3370: 3363: 3359: 3355: 3351: 3347: 3339: 3332: 3330: 3324: 3320: 3312: 3310: 3309: 3305: 3301: 3293: 3289: 3285: 3281: 3280:RockMagnetist 3277: 3276: 3275: 3272: 3268: 3264: 3260: 3256: 3248: 3246: 3238: 3234: 3230: 3226: 3222: 3218: 3217: 3216: 3214: 3206: 3202: 3198: 3194: 3189: 3188: 3187: 3186: 3182: 3178: 3177:RockMagnetist 3174: 3152: 3148: 3144: 3143:RockMagnetist 3140: 3135: 3134: 3133: 3132: 3131: 3130: 3129: 3128: 3127: 3126: 3125: 3124: 3123: 3122: 3121: 3120: 3105: 3101: 3097: 3093: 3090: 3089: 3088: 3087: 3086: 3085: 3084: 3083: 3082: 3081: 3080: 3079: 3078: 3077: 3061: 3057: 3056: 3055: 3054: 3053: 3052: 3051: 3050: 3049: 3048: 3047: 3046: 3045: 3044: 3027: 3026: 3025: 3024: 3023: 3022: 3021: 3020: 3019: 3018: 3017: 3016: 3015: 3014: 2998: 2994: 2990: 2986: 2982: 2978: 2974: 2968: 2964: 2960: 2959:RockMagnetist 2956: 2952: 2951: 2950: 2946: 2942: 2938: 2935: 2931: 2930: 2929: 2925: 2921: 2920:RockMagnetist 2916: 2915: 2914: 2910: 2906: 2903: 2900: 2896: 2892: 2888: 2886: 2882: 2878: 2875: 2872: 2868: 2864: 2860: 2856: 2853: 2851: 2847: 2843: 2840: 2837: 2833: 2829: 2825: 2821: 2820: 2819: 2818: 2817: 2816: 2815: 2814: 2813: 2812: 2811: 2810: 2793: 2789: 2785: 2776: 2775: 2774: 2773: 2772: 2771: 2770: 2769: 2768: 2767: 2766: 2765: 2764: 2763: 2762: 2761: 2744: 2740: 2736: 2735:RockMagnetist 2732: 2731: 2730: 2729: 2728: 2727: 2726: 2725: 2724: 2723: 2722: 2721: 2720: 2719: 2718: 2717: 2700: 2696: 2692: 2691:RockMagnetist 2687: 2686: 2685: 2684: 2683: 2682: 2681: 2680: 2679: 2678: 2677: 2676: 2675: 2674: 2673: 2672: 2655: 2651: 2647: 2643: 2639: 2635: 2634: 2633: 2632: 2631: 2630: 2629: 2628: 2627: 2626: 2625: 2624: 2623: 2622: 2621: 2620: 2605: 2601: 2597: 2596:RockMagnetist 2593: 2592: 2591: 2590: 2589: 2588: 2587: 2586: 2585: 2584: 2583: 2582: 2581: 2580: 2565: 2561: 2557: 2556:RockMagnetist 2553: 2548: 2544: 2540: 2539: 2538: 2537: 2536: 2535: 2534: 2533: 2532: 2531: 2530: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2514: 2510: 2506: 2501: 2500: 2499: 2498: 2497: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2493: 2492: 2491: 2490: 2479: 2475: 2471: 2470:RockMagnetist 2467: 2463: 2461: 2457: 2453: 2452:RockMagnetist 2449: 2445: 2444: 2443: 2439: 2435: 2430: 2429: 2428: 2424: 2420: 2416: 2415:number theory 2411: 2408: 2406: 2402: 2401: 2400: 2396: 2392: 2388: 2380: 2376: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2366: 2362: 2358: 2354: 2353: 2348: 2344: 2340: 2336: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2328: 2324: 2320: 2312: 2308: 2305: 2304: 2303: 2299: 2292: 2287: 2285: 2280: 2275: 2270: 2269: 2266: 2262: 2258: 2254: 2250: 2246: 2243: 2241: 2237: 2233: 2229: 2228:Functionality 2225: 2222: 2219: 2216: 2214: 2210: 2206: 2201: 2197: 2194: 2192: 2188: 2184: 2180: 2176: 2173: 2171: 2167: 2163: 2159: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2149: 2145: 2141: 2137: 2133: 2129: 2124: 2123: 2119: 2115: 2111: 2104: 2102: 2097: 2092: 2087: 2086: 2081: 2075: 2071: 2067: 2063: 2060: 2056: 2053: 2049: 2045: 2042: 2038: 2034: 2030: 2026: 2025: 2024: 2023: 2020: 2016: 2012: 2008: 2004: 2000: 1996: 1992: 1988: 1984: 1980: 1976: 1975:WP:NOTABILITY 1972: 1971: 1970: 1969: 1965: 1961: 1954: 1947: 1938: 1934: 1929: 1926: 1922: 1919: 1915: 1912: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1900: 1898: 1897: 1893: 1889: 1884: 1876: 1872: 1868: 1864: 1860: 1859: 1858: 1857: 1852: 1846: 1840: 1832: 1831: 1826: 1820: 1814: 1803: 1799: 1795: 1791: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1781: 1777: 1773: 1769: 1765: 1758: 1750: 1748: 1747: 1743: 1739: 1731: 1729: 1726: 1722: 1718: 1714: 1710: 1702: 1701: 1694: 1692: 1687: 1683: 1679: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1667: 1663: 1654: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1647: 1643: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1626: 1622: 1619: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1604: 1600: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1585: 1581: 1573: 1569: 1565: 1561: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1550: 1546: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1532: 1524: 1522: 1521: 1517: 1513: 1506: 1504: 1502: 1498: 1494: 1490: 1486: 1478: 1474: 1471: 1470: 1466: 1462: 1454: 1450: 1447: 1443: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1435: 1431: 1427: 1423: 1416: 1410: 1406: 1402: 1398: 1394: 1389: 1385: 1371: 1367: 1363: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1352: 1348: 1343: 1340: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1330: 1326: 1321: 1318: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1309: 1305: 1301: 1297: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1277: 1273: 1270: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1261: 1257: 1252: 1248: 1245: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1236: 1232: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1223: 1219: 1215: 1211: 1207: 1200: 1193: 1187: 1183: 1179: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1169: 1165: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1154: 1150: 1146: 1139:Encalc a CAS? 1138: 1130: 1126: 1122: 1118: 1114: 1113: 1111: 1107: 1103: 1102:71.229.28.197 1099: 1093: 1092: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1074: 1064: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1044: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1034: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1021: 1020: 1017: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1009: 1005: 1001: 997: 986: 980: 977: 973: 967: 961: 960: 959: 958: 955: 951: 947: 942: 941: 936: 933: 928: 927: 926: 925: 920: 917: 916:82.139.85.207 912: 911: 910: 909: 906: 903: 898: 897: 896: 895: 892: 883: 881: 880: 877: 873: 869: 861: 853: 850: 846: 842: 838: 834: 830: 829: 828: 823: 818: 813: 812: 811: 808: 804: 800: 796: 795: 794: 793: 790: 782: 767: 763: 757: 754: 753: 750: 746:List articles 733: 729: 725: 721: 720: 715: 712: 708: 707: 703: 697: 694: 691: 687: 674: 670: 664: 661: 660: 657: 640: 636: 632: 631: 623: 617: 612: 610: 607: 603: 602: 598: 592: 589: 586: 582: 553: 546: 542: 541: 539: 537: 533: 528: 525: 524: 522: 520: 519: 514: 509: 506: 505: 503: 501: 500: 495: 490: 487: 484: 480: 479: 477: 475: 474: 469: 464: 461: 460: 458: 456: 455: 450: 445: 442: 441: 439: 437: 436: 431: 426: 423: 422: 420: 418: 417: 412: 407: 404: 403: 401: 399: 398: 393: 388: 385: 383: 380: 379: 377: 375: 374: 369: 364: 361: 360: 358: 356: 355: 350: 349: 346: 342: 338: 337: 334: 333: 329: 325: 324: 320: 316: 312: 306: 303: 302: 299: 282: 278: 274: 273: 268: 265: 261: 260: 256: 250: 247: 244: 240: 227: 218: 214: 213: 209: 205: 199: 196: 195: 192: 175: 171: 167: 166: 158: 147: 145: 142: 138: 137: 133: 127: 124: 121: 117: 112: 108: 102: 94: 85: 84: 76: 72: 68: 64: 61: 57: 56: 48: 44: 40: 36: 29: 28: 19: 4200: 4196: 4183: 4156:— Preceding 4153: 4101:— Preceding 4099: 4093: 4035:— Preceding 4032: 4029:MathHandbook 4013: 3991: 3988: 3963:source check 3942: 3936: 3933: 3906: 3903: 3860:— Preceding 3857: 3835: 3813: 3787: 3757: 3688: 3685: 3682: 3653: 3647: 3629: 3616: 3605:edit request 3573: 3550: 3525:source check 3504: 3498: 3485: 3481: 3477: 3475: 3436: 3433: 3413: 3394: 3390: 3367:— Preceding 3364: 3344:— Preceding 3340: 3336: 3316: 3297: 3253:— Preceding 3249: 3242: 3210: 3172: 3169: 3138: 3059: 2996: 2992: 2988: 2984: 2980: 2976: 2954: 2898: 2894: 2890: 2870: 2866: 2862: 2858: 2855:Keith Geddes 2835: 2831: 2823: 2386: 2375:sine qua non 2374: 2316: 2310: 2300: 2296: 2278: 2271: 2244: 2220: 2217: 2195: 2174: 2157: 2126: 2109: 2107: 2095: 2088: 1942: 1904: 1880: 1833: 1807: 1762:— Preceding 1754: 1735: 1703: 1698: 1690: 1659: 1638: 1615: 1596: 1577: 1571: 1541: 1528: 1510: 1483:— Preceding 1479: 1475: 1472: 1458: 1426:87.10.165.27 1417: 1414: 1392: 1387: 1201: 1197: 1142: 1096:— Preceding 1077:71.37.58.190 1068: 990: 965: 887: 865: 844: 840: 836: 786: 761: 728:project page 717: 669:Low-priority 668: 628: 594:Low‑priority 535: 534: 518:Unreferenced 516: 515: 497: 496: 471: 470: 452: 451: 433: 432: 414: 413: 395: 394: 371: 370: 352: 351: 310: 270: 203: 163: 107:WikiProjects 74: 4203:144.212.5.9 4128:independent 4073:independent 3492:Sourcecheck 3373:81.202.0.95 3096:Yappy2bhere 2905:Yappy2bhere 2891:Mathematics 2877:Yappy2bhere 2842:Yappy2bhere 2784:Yappy2bhere 2646:Deltahedron 2505:Deltahedron 2434:Yappy2bhere 2391:Yappy2bhere 2313:Xcas, Yacas 2284:move review 2249:WP:LISTNAME 2232:Yappy2bhere 2224:WP:LISTNAME 2183:Deltahedron 2101:move review 2011:Yappy2bhere 1909:It is pure 1707:—Preceding 1570:skills are 1564:Mathematica 1560:Mathematica 1531:Mathematica 1489:Matthew138s 1420:—Preceding 1204:—Preceding 1071:—Preceding 1016:guiltyspark 1000:66.193.5.99 994:—Preceding 644:Mathematics 635:mathematics 591:Mathematics 4219:Categories 4124:XOR'easter 4081:XOR'easter 4000:Report bug 3791:Spintendo 3782:I believe 3417:Pkoprowski 3397:JonMcLoone 3350:JonMcLoone 3323:GNU Octave 3319:GNU Octave 2642:Algebrator 2638:verifiable 2543:WP:NOTESAL 2196:Not oppose 2110:page moved 2048:Mathomatic 2041:due weight 1768:Pkoprowski 1119:instead.-- 1029:JonMcLoone 946:Netsettler 732:discussion 97:List-class 4016:NonLynSys 3983:this tool 3976:this tool 3841:Jan Burse 3819:Jan Burse 3700:spalfrey 3545:this tool 3538:this tool 2987:but uses 2466:this link 2029:WP:FRINGE 2007:WP:FRINGE 1991:neologism 1983:hyperbole 1933:WP:FRINGE 1886:. Thanks 1662:Cloudruns 1642:Cloudruns 1621:Cloudruns 1599:Cloudruns 1580:Cloudruns 1545:Cloudruns 843:(I think 406:Computing 4170:contribs 4158:unsigned 4132:reliable 4115:contribs 4107:Drhuang8 4103:unsigned 4077:reliable 4049:contribs 4041:Drhuang8 4037:unsigned 3989:Cheers.— 3862:unsigned 3767:Spalfrey 3742:Spalfrey 3708:Spalfrey 3690:Spalfrey 3621:Spalfrey 3551:Cheers.— 3449:cbignore 3369:unsigned 3358:contribs 3346:unsigned 3267:contribs 3259:D.Lazard 3255:unsigned 3193:D.Lazard 2979:but use 2955:required 2941:D.Lazard 2899:symbolic 2779:cheat on 2419:D.Lazard 2339:D.Lazard 2319:D.Lazard 2257:PaleAqua 2205:D.Lazard 2066:D.Lazard 1960:D.Lazard 1850:contribs 1838:asmeurer 1824:contribs 1812:asmeurer 1776:contribs 1764:unsigned 1721:contribs 1713:Wikiwide 1709:unsigned 1678:Drkirkby 1512:Mikejens 1497:contribs 1485:unsigned 1422:unsigned 1397:Drkirkby 1393:download 1347:Karnesky 1304:Karnesky 1231:Karnesky 1218:contribs 1206:unsigned 1098:unsigned 1073:unsigned 1047:Karnesky 996:unsigned 902:Gesslein 876:Karnesky 849:Karnesky 807:Karnesky 789:Karnesky 454:Maintain 397:Copyedit 67:deletion 3913:my edit 3761:Jd22292 3736:Jd22292 3715:jd22292 3561::Online 3478:checked 3443:my edit 3139:et. al. 3058:Geddes 2357:Mistory 2245:Support 2218:Support 2175:Support 2158:Support 2114:Andrewa 2052:WP:SPIP 2003:WP:SPIP 1999:notable 1995:WP:SPIP 1937:WP:NPOV 1877:Mathics 1695:Dubious 891:Shinobu 822:contrib 817:Samsara 803:Samsara 764:on the 671:on the 435:Infobox 373:Cleanup 313:on the 226:Systems 206:on the 179:Systems 170:systems 126:Systems 4162:Moueza 3486:failed 3457:nobots 3313:Octave 3300:Dimacq 3173:et al. 3060:et al. 2869:, and 2405:SIGSAM 2383:either 2311:SymPy, 1568:MATLAB 1362:T68492 1325:T68492 1281:T68492 1256:T68492 1210:T68492 1164:T68492 1145:Encalc 416:Expand 103:scale. 3603:This 2836:exact 2377:of a 2162:Salix 2144:Salix 1981:" is 1979:WP:OR 1911:WP:OR 1885:: --> 1656:that. 1117:MuPAD 833:DoCon 799:DoCon 737:Lists 696:Lists 499:Stubs 473:Photo 330:with: 4207:talk 4166:talk 4140:talk 4111:talk 4085:talk 4063:talk 4045:talk 4020:talk 3890:talk 3870:talk 3845:talk 3823:talk 3771:talk 3749:talk 3722:talk 3694:talk 3625:talk 3580:talk 3482:true 3421:talk 3401:talk 3377:talk 3354:talk 3327:2013 3304:talk 3284:talk 3263:talk 3232:CAS. 3197:talk 3181:talk 3147:talk 3100:talk 2963:talk 2945:talk 2939:) -- 2924:talk 2909:talk 2893:and 2881:talk 2846:talk 2788:talk 2739:talk 2695:talk 2650:talk 2600:talk 2560:talk 2509:talk 2474:talk 2456:talk 2438:talk 2423:talk 2395:talk 2361:talk 2343:talk 2323:talk 2261:talk 2236:talk 2209:talk 2187:talk 2166:talk 2148:talk 2118:talk 2070:talk 2015:talk 1964:talk 1953:main 1892:talk 1867:talk 1844:talk 1818:talk 1794:talk 1772:talk 1742:talk 1717:talk 1682:talk 1666:talk 1646:talk 1625:talk 1603:talk 1584:talk 1549:talk 1516:talk 1493:talk 1465:talk 1446:Talk 1430:talk 1401:talk 1366:talk 1351:talk 1329:talk 1308:talk 1300:SAGE 1296:fink 1285:talk 1271:and 1260:talk 1246:and 1235:talk 1214:talk 1182:talk 1168:talk 1153:talk 1125:talk 1106:talk 1081:talk 1051:talk 1033:talk 1004:talk 976:Talk 950:talk 172:and 75:keep 73:was 3957:RfC 3927:to 3732:Hi 3704:Hi 3519:RfC 3496:). 3484:or 3469:to 2826:is 2387:are 2276:. 2221:per 2168:): 2150:): 1572:far 1442:MFH 1388:and 972:MFH 801:. 756:Low 663:Low 305:Low 198:Low 4221:: 4209:) 4194:. 4172:) 4168:• 4142:) 4130:, 4117:) 4113:• 4087:) 4075:, 4065:) 4051:) 4047:• 4022:) 3970:. 3965:}} 3961:{{ 3892:) 3872:) 3847:) 3825:) 3796:ᔦᔭ 3773:) 3751:) 3724:) 3696:) 3627:) 3582:) 3532:. 3527:}} 3523:{{ 3494:}} 3490:{{ 3455:{{ 3451:}} 3447:{{ 3423:) 3403:) 3379:) 3360:) 3356:• 3321:| 3317:! 3306:) 3286:) 3269:) 3265:• 3199:) 3183:) 3149:) 3102:) 2965:) 2947:) 2926:) 2911:) 2883:) 2865:, 2861:, 2848:) 2790:) 2741:) 2697:) 2652:) 2602:) 2562:) 2511:) 2476:) 2458:) 2440:) 2425:) 2397:) 2363:) 2345:) 2325:) 2263:) 2238:) 2211:) 2189:) 2130:→ 2120:) 2112:. 2093:. 2072:) 2017:) 2009:. 1966:) 1956:}} 1950:{{ 1894:) 1869:) 1847:| 1821:| 1796:) 1788:-- 1778:) 1774:• 1744:) 1723:) 1719:• 1684:) 1668:) 1648:) 1627:) 1605:) 1586:) 1551:) 1533:: 1518:) 1499:) 1495:• 1467:) 1459:-- 1432:) 1403:) 1368:) 1353:) 1331:) 1310:) 1287:) 1262:) 1237:) 1220:) 1216:• 1184:) 1170:) 1155:) 1127:) 1108:) 1083:) 1053:) 1035:) 1027:. 1006:) 952:) 932:AC 555:}} 549:{{ 4205:( 4164:( 4138:( 4109:( 4083:( 4061:( 4043:( 4018:( 4002:) 3998:( 3985:. 3978:. 3888:( 3868:( 3843:( 3821:( 3769:( 3763:. 3759:@ 3747:( 3738:. 3734:@ 3720:( 3710:. 3706:@ 3692:( 3644:) 3623:( 3578:( 3547:. 3540:. 3419:( 3399:( 3375:( 3352:( 3302:( 3282:( 3261:( 3195:( 3179:( 3145:( 3098:( 2961:( 2943:( 2922:( 2907:( 2879:( 2844:( 2786:( 2737:( 2693:( 2648:( 2598:( 2558:( 2507:( 2472:( 2454:( 2436:( 2421:( 2393:( 2359:( 2341:( 2321:( 2259:( 2234:( 2207:( 2185:( 2164:( 2146:( 2116:( 2068:( 2054:? 2043:. 2013:( 1962:( 1939:. 1931:( 1927:. 1890:( 1865:( 1853:) 1841:( 1827:) 1815:( 1792:( 1770:( 1740:( 1715:( 1680:( 1664:( 1644:( 1623:( 1601:( 1582:( 1547:( 1514:( 1491:( 1463:( 1444:: 1428:( 1399:( 1364:( 1349:( 1327:( 1306:( 1283:( 1258:( 1233:( 1212:( 1180:( 1166:( 1151:( 1123:( 1104:( 1079:( 1049:( 1031:( 1002:( 974:: 948:( 768:. 734:. 675:. 538:: 521:: 502:: 485:) 476:: 457:: 438:: 419:: 400:: 376:: 357:: 317:. 228:. 210:. 176:. 109:: 77:. 49:. 20:)

Index

Talk:Comparison of computer algebra systems
List of computer algebra systems
/Old article history
/Old talk history
Articles for deletion
deletion
the discussion
content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Systems
WikiProject icon
Systems science portal
WikiProject Systems
systems
systems science
Low
project's importance scale
Taskforce icon
Systems
WikiProject icon
Computer science
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Computer science
Computer science
the discussion
Low
project's importance scale
WikiProject Computer science

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑