2011:
every four years before their presidential nominating convention pledging their fidelity to national party principles and affirming that they have a duly elected organization with their own state bylaws and depository bank account. Other than that, they are completely on their own and do not receive any financial support or direction from the national organization. This is why some state affiliates do not identify themselves with the "Constitution Party" name even though they send committeemen and delegates to national meetings and conventions and vote on internal national party policies. Thus, the states are free to take independent positions and actions on issues where the national has not yet stated any. It is for this reason that yesterday's proposed
Knowledge (XXG) page merger (and by who's authority, anyway) is completely out of order. Merging of the state pages will muddy all of the individual state party histories and just add confusion to the subject - SOMETHING WHICH IS 180 DEGREES COMPLETELY OPPOSITE OF WIKIPEDIA'S STATED OBJECTIVES. -
1380:
in coming elections). In the most recent U.S. Presidential election, the
Libertarians garnered the most votes in 2012 of any non-major party candidate, but less than 1% of popular vote Gary Johnson garnered 1.2M votes (followed by Jill Stein of the Green Party). Rosenstone, Behr and Lazarus (1996) conclude that the success of third party candidates in the US historically is more a function of candidate quality (name recognition, prior electoral experience) than organizational factors. Further findings point to dissatisfaction with existing parties / trust in govt / scandal are all factors that seem to lead to increases in minor party vote share. So... not about membership size or primary participation. Whether using number of fielded candidates, vote share, count of elected representatives, or some other unspecified metric, discussing which is the third largest party in the US is probably not a worth wasting more time on. They are both very minor parties in a two-party system.
3046:. The problem isn't it being listed as Far right, but the existence of that term itself. It seems that anyone can be called "Far " if they are radical, criminal, out of the mainstream, advocating revolution, left (or right) of center left (or center right), advocate terrorism, want to install a dictatorship, not a moderate, etc. This is a very, very loose association and generally not useful. With that said, my main concerns are making sure the articles stick to the sources and maintaining consistency between the articles about political parties/caucuses. I'm trying to come up with a solution to this that can be applied to all (at least American) political parties/organizations. A page dedicated to the American political spectrum may be called for, but I just don't know. I'm always open to suggestions. Thank you for your patience with my terrible response time.
2978:
linking to the "far right" wikipedia page gives the impression that the editorial writer is using that term as synonymous with the Wiki characterization, when it's perhaps a rhetorical flourish common to political editorials (e.g., the "far left" SPLC); and (2) the use of passive voice ("The party is considered a far-right political party") obscures the fact that it is particular people and organizations that are characterizing the CP as far right. As for (1), we don't have evidence that the editorialists meant to compare the CP to, say, neo-fascists or other political hierarchicalists. We can resolve (1) by not linking to the "far right" wiki page. As for (2), as it stands it uses weasel wording. We can resolve (2) by removing the passive voice and making clear who characterizes the CP as far right.
4810:
1468:
distorted communication; that which offers a position for a subject; forms of thought motivated by social interests; identity thinking; socially necessary illusion; the conjuncture of discourse and power; the medium in which conscious social actors make sense of their world; action-oriented sets of beliefs; the confusion of linguistic and phenomenal reality; semiotic closure; the indispensable medium in which individuals live out their relations to a social structure; the process whereby social life is converted to a natural reality.
1353:
elections is the
Democratic Farmer Labor with 4.1M votes for 26 candidates, though this party is 'affiliated' with the Democratic Party. The next largest party in 3rd party vote share was Libertarian with 2.3M votes over 212 candidates, followed by the Independent Party, Working Families, Conservative Party, Progressive Party...with an AIP / Constitution Party combination (including votes cast on fusion ballots) coming in around the 13th largest vote getter. So... by votes cast in federal contests, AIP/Constitution is assuredly NOT the third largest party.
338:
317:
2173:
identifies "purple" as its color, other than an unsourced claim on
Knowledge (XXG) itself claiming that purple is its "customary" color; there is nothing "purple" on the Constitution Party website. I think the color used for the Constitution Party should be changed to better reflect the party and its values. Purple does NOT fit the Constitution Party. A shade of beige resembling the parchment of the U.S. Constitution would be a much better fit for the Constitution Party.
556:
1787:
348:
806:
715:
480:
697:
449:
490:
1104:
1028:
1001:
608:
901:
911:
880:
796:
775:
1038:
4767:
4605:
1196:
supported Alan Keyes and the
American Party in the Presidential campaign rather than supporting CP's Chuck Baldwin. They secured ballot access under the AIP name in California, so arguably the American Party faction has greater claim as *the* AIP. In any case, the issue is disputed, and so probably we should revise the history section to avoid making stronger claims than are warranted.
1400:
Characterizing the party as "Far right" is problematic for several reasons, mainly because there isn't any thing in the platform which someone who is on the right side of the
Republican mainstream would disagree with. That the reference cited was from the SPLC, an organization which tends to label almost all committed conservatives as "extreme" or "Far right" is also a problem.
286:
1136:
576:
232:
2406:
that call Justin Bieber a "punk", would you expect that to go in the lead of his bio? Just because someone has said it doesn't make it the best choice. This is especially true in the lead, which sets the tone for the rest of the article. Some discussion later in the article is one thing, but lead, and in this case the first sentence, is something else.
2272:
to question the reliability there. One of those sources (A Religion of Peace) actually says that the party is not a theocratic one. The rest of the ones one the first two pages or results don't support calling them a theocracy. So again, we're pretty much limited to one or two sources saying it (and one that refutes it), and the use is a bit dubious.
4919:
until 2018 that they would have ballot access in the state. Furthermore, there wasn't any information that made the state-affiliated party distinct from the national party at the time. I want to be able to share that information that has developed since then in its own wikipedia page. Hope you respond soon, thanks for taking the time to read this.
4843:
until 2018 that they would have ballot access in the state. Furthermore, there wasn't any information that made the state-affiliated party distinct from the national party at the time. I want to be able to share that information that has developed since then in its own wikipedia page. Hope you respond soon, thanks for taking the time to read this.
4153:
3962:
3841:
3578:
2758:
the lead. I'd also note that both of the sources calling it theocratic are from the same author, Blumenthal. This isn't a question of whether or not a RS has ever said that. The question is whether or not the term is used regularly enough to be one of the first things a reader sees? I don't see the broad use that would make me comfortable with it.
2333:"Another far-right organization with whom the AIP has long been aligned is Howard Phillips’ militia-minded Constitution Party. The AIP has been listed as the Constitution Party’s state affiliate since the late 1990s, and it has endorsed the Constitution Party’s presidential candidates (Michael Peroutka and Chuck Baldwin) in the past two elections.
2299:
Catholics, who presumably wouldn't subscribe to
Christian Reconstructionism as such (though are probably sympathetic to a larger "Christian America" rhetoric.) I think the party is more comparable to, say, France's Front National (which also has theocratic roots but is not a strictly theocratic party at this point) than to the Netherlands' SGP.
4668:
4681:
2234:
2168:) as the color for the Constitution Party? I can't see any logical reason why a shade of violet would be used for a right-wing Christian party. Violet is a feminine color associated perhaps with the LGBT community and left-wing social justice movements. I think it would make most logical sense to use a shade of beige like
2900:
the party's position to be listed as just right wing, we will need to see sources. If there are problems with the sources let's discuss it. However, the current sources used don't label them 'right wing' and the article should reflect this. I'm open to other ideas, but simply ignoring the sources isn't one of them.
3143:
Oh no, I have no problems with the alphabetical order (that is why I fixed it twice after your edit summary) if that is the option you like most. This said, I would prioritize the ideologies logically, in the following way: Paleoconservatism, Fiscal conservatism, Social conservatism, Christian right,
2405:
Doug, I haven't made this confrontational, so I'd appreciate it if you keep the snipe comments to a minimum. No, I haven't looked for proof that some sources called it "right wing". Why exactly would I since my point was that the term is being used as a pejorative? If I can find 5-10 reliable sources
1933:
so they thought it was worth using - I don't think you can call them on the left, nor do we call the SPLC left. P. 86 of the book you asked about says "was indignant. He promptly transferred his support from Dole to his longtime friend Howard
Phillips, a Far Right stalwart running under the banner of
1227:
The very title of this Talk
Section exhibits political dyslexia. National parties do not affiliate with State parties, nor do they in most instances "absorb" them. State parties affiliate with national parties, not the reverse. State parties may DISaffiliate from national parties, witness the parting
2995:
Even if we do all this however, I wonder if we aren't just obscuring the fact that "far right" is fairly vague as a label, and often used as pejorative. That is how I'm inclined to see its use in the sources cited. As applied to, say, National
Socialism, it is probably a useful term. When applied
2977:
I am a late-comer to this, but I'll speak for the other side. I am uncomfortable with the characterization as "far right", at least as it stands right now. The online sources cited that call the CP "far right" are editorials, and aren't exactly NPOV. That might be okay, except for two things: (1)
2899:
I would like to find some consensus before an edit war breaks out. Now the sources, all of them, refer to the party as "far right". A while back I listed 'right wing' with 'far right' and added a citation needed to the right wing statement. This would seem to work for the time being. If anyone wants
2298:
I'd like to throw in my two cents that recent candidates in the party seem to be moving away from the Christian Reconstructionism elements and more towards overt nationalist positions (anti-immigration, isolationism, protectionism). It's worth noting that a number of candidates have been Mormons and
2172:
for the Constitution Party- the color of the parchment of the U.S. Constitution, and a color that better reflects the stoic conservatism of the Constitution Party. The official colors of the Constitution Party are red, white, and blue- I can't find any evidence whatsoever that the Constitution Party
1948:
I don't think you'll find many on the left who think that the SPLC is on the right, but you will find an awful lot of people on the right who consider the SPLC to be on the left. That aside whether the Philadelphia Enquirer thinks the quote is good enough or not is not a sign of approval or neutral
1934:
the theocratic U.S. Taxpayers Party." I don't think it's needed in the footnote. We aren't saying that it is theocratic, just that it's been described as theocratic, which is clearly correct. A statement like that is of course made by its critics (and given their goals it's clear why they say that).
1890:
I see there is was a discussion over 6 years ago with editors trying to argue over whether or not this party is theocratic. Again, that is a misunderstanding of how Knowledge (XXG) should work. We can, and should, say that the CP and its predecessor have been described as theocratic. I note that one
1582:
what they perceive as the "center-right" stance of the GOP. They might not be "far right" (as I mentioned above), but they sit firmly on the right side of the spectrum on almost all issues. Even those issues in which they tend to disagree with the right and agree with the left (such as against free
1379:
You could use # of electoral winners as the metric to decide size of party - as is historically used to describe a party system. . So, in that instance , neither page is correct. You could use vote share in presidential elections (relevant to several advantages -financial, balloting - for the party
1210:
I second the criticism above. The author of this article is unclear on the concept of the relation of State Political Parties to National Parties. State parties are affiliated with national parties, they are not PART of national parties, hence the verbs "to absorb" or to "split" are inappropriate to
1172:
This article also suffers from POV framing and leans heavily on hyperbolic editorials as citations. I just looked up the references for the "far right" label, and they were all polemical or dismissive references rather than an attempt to identify the CP with the views on the wiki "far right" page.
4918:
Hello, The reasoning for my wish to have this specific article undeleted is because circumstances revolving around the state-affiliated party had changed. At the time the deletion process was occurring, the Constitution Party of North Carolina didn't have ballot access at that point. It wouldn't be
4842:
Hello, The reasoning for my wish to have this specific article undeleted is because circumstances revolving around the state-affiliated party had changed. At the time the deletion process was occurring, the Constitution Party of North Carolina didn't have ballot access at that point. It wouldn't be
3129:. I should have said that this is generally the case. I'm not going to mess with it until we can come to some sort of agreement. I may be missing something. How does it being in alphabetical order cause (or contribute to) the problem that you were trying to fix? Thanks for starting this discussion.
2271:
Looking at some of them, I find it interesting that Blumenthal is one who uses it. He's the one we use as a source earlier. Aren't there other sources on the party besides him? The second source on the list is from a company called OR Books, a print-on-demand "alternative" publisher. I'm gonna have
2217:
Regarding the use of "theocracy" in the lead: I did a quick search and the cited article was the only news article I saw that called the party a theocracy. Admittedly, the search wasn't overly in-depth. If there are more reliable sources that call it that, I'd be happy to look at them and see if my
1370:
The 'third largest party' claims the original poster is concerned about seems to be making claims about party identification - a political-sociological concept that is not about ascribing party 'membership' as recorded by a party. The ANES tracks partisan 'identifiers' since 1952, but their measure
2757:
I think what complicates this is that the party has been so fluid. It has made several changes over the years and has had state level parties using the same name join and leave the national party. That's another reason I'm hesitant to "tar and feather" the party by using a term like "theocracy" in
1195:
Right now, the history section gives the impression that the AIP merged with the Constitution Party, which seems not to be accurate. The AIP was the California affiliate with the CP from 1992-2008 and then underwent a dispute over whether to remain so affiliated. Breaking into factions, one side
3101:
that "political positions in info boxes for political parties in the United States are in alphabetical order", but that is not true. As with most political parties in the world, ideologies are listed by priority or logical order. In fact, it would be quite strange to have "Fiscal conservatism" or
1335:
Are you proposing a # of voters in AIP vs Libertarian (or Constitution) primaries as the metric to determine which is the larger party? It is not clear why registration would be the best or most relevant indicator of party size, as party affiliation is something that is often only an indicator of
2812:
Categorizing any political party as "right-wing" or "theocratic" has nothing to do with how the group is referred to regularly. They're political science terms and are quite neutral. Any perceived negative meanings just have to do with personal value judgments and depend on the reader; e.g., the
2010:
The Constitution Party is unlike other political parties in that it has a bottom up rather than a top down organization. Per it's national bylaws, each state organization is regarded as an independent affiliate. In fact, each state party must submit a signed document to the national organization
1914:
Although it's clear that there are observers who call the Constitution Party "Theocratic" and this should be in the article, I'm rather uneasy that all the three sources I've seen (and the fourth one is published by Nation books) are identifiably on the left either by source (Chip Berlet and the
1431:
article is "Far right politics involves support of strong or complete social hierarchy in society, and supports supremacy of certain individuals or groups deemed to be innately superior who are to be more valued than those deemed to be innately inferior." This does not seem to describe the CP's
1399:
I've been bothered by the Constitution Party being listed as "Far right" on social issues for a while, not because I am a member of the party or am even sympathetic to its positions on social issues(I'm not- I'm sure Constitutional Party members would condemn many of my raw Libertarian beliefs).
1966:
So maybe the SPLC is in the center, in any case the consensus at the SPLC's article is not to describe it as on the left. You'd expect people on the right to call almost anyone they disagree with as left-wing. It's fine to say critics. As for the citation, it's the only one that states that its
1454:
As a collection of certain ideas with certain kinds of content, usually normative; As the form or internal logical structure that ideas have within a set; By the role in which ideas play in human-social interaction; By the role that ideas play in the structure of an organization; As
1273:
I agree with the sentiment, if not with the conclusion. Surely there must be official records of registered voters for these organizations which can settle which is larger. Actual records should be favoured over more citations. But otherwise I agree, only one of these should be marked as the
4893:
I've been looking for sources. There's very little on the NC branch in its own right in RSes - they gained ballot access in 2018 and lost it again in 2021, though one interesting thing is their successful challenge to NC's "Sore Loser" law. But I'm having trouble finding enough third-party RS
3295:
No "major party" starts with criticism in the opening section. This has no sense to an equitable format via an unbaised journal. Will be removing such text and reformatting to place such discussion after the identification, unless there are good answers given as to why such should stay in the
2358:
The source (Blumenthal) seems to like to use words like theocracy and right-wing. He spreads it around. But inevitably, it comes back to a guy saying it. "Right-wing" can be used as a pejorative and I think it is being used that way in this case. Let me ask this, if we eliminate anything with
1467:
the process of production of meanings, signs and values in social life; a body of ideas characteristic of a particular social group or class; ideas which help to legitimate a dominant political power; false ideas which help to legitimate a dominant political power; systematically
1352:
you wanted to use vote counts to determine the size of a party, the AIP & Constitution Party garnered ~34,000 primary & ~145,000 general votes over 56 candidates in the 2012 congressional elections It looks like the highest minor party vote getter (by FAR) in the 2012 congressional
1403:
But listing them as simply "right wing" has its own problems as well. The Constitution Party does approach things from a different angle much as the Libertarian Party does(I've heard Libertarians called "right wing" on economic issues and "left wing" on social issues, but that's a gross
4738:
Please change "Tancredo's New Home In The Constitution Party: A Paleoconservative Group" to "Tancredo's New Home In The Constitution Party: A Religious, Paleoconservative Group" in the references, the term "religious," was removed from the reference article title in an apparent
1361:
Oligarchies need oligarchs, so parties have to field candidates to gain power. If one wanted to use the number of candidates fielded to assess party size, the Libertarian Party does a far better job than any other minor party to attract candidates to run under their label.
629:
1371:
is focused upon the 2 relevant parties in the US and trying to put them in relation to each other . Gallup also does not seem to have enough non-major party identifiers to report from their rolling sample. Other ideas where to look for this public opinion info? CCES?
1949:
point of view, the view is still the SPLC's. I think that the theocratic tag is important as a lot of critical comment on the Constitution Party uses this tag, but we should ensure that it's clear that this is from critics and not from friends or neutral bystanders.
2340:
I'm sure there are sources that call it conservative, but there are also sources that call it right-wing - do people seriously see it as some equivalent to the Republican Party? The Republicans are conservative - isn't this group to the right, as many sources say?
2336:
The Constitution Party boasts an openly theocratic platform that reads, “It is our goal to limit the federal government to its delegated, enumerated, Constitutional functions and to restore American jurisprudence to its original Biblical common-law foundations.”
1168:
There is a lot of information that may be useful, properly organized, but is distributed oddly over the whole work. Lots of editing work to be done. The affiliates table is likely too useful for deletion, but perhaps it should go at the end of the article?
3272:
I removed "theocracy" and moved "paleoconservatism" up. As I said, I think that "fiscal conservatism" and "social conservatism" should go right after "paleoconservatism", as they are two tenets of it. "Christian right" could/should go to the fourth place.
1347:
Many (most) minor parties have nominating conventions and not primaries, so a vote share is not recorded in Secretaries of State's records, so primary vote may be misleading. Lets look at all possible votes (combining votes cast at primary & general).
3195:
That would be an improvement. However, I would refrain from using bold and I stick to the order I proposed — Paleoconsevatism, Fiscal conservatism, Social conservatism, Christian right, Theocracy — even though the latter seems a little bit too far to me.
2925:", as a person or organization's location on the political spectrum often relative and/or subjective. Unfortunately, as you mentioned, there are no sources in this article which label the CP as right-wing, and it will probably be difficult to find one. --
2428:, my apologies. Although I do try my best to find sources myself. I've removed the NPOV tag. In fact, I've been confused by the fact there is a lot about a party with this name which I don' think we've written about, one that Carto was involved with. Eg
1485:
The thing is none of those statements address the fact that most of the values that were listed in the ideology box were already covered by the ideologies listed. We don't need over a dozen values listed when we can list half as many ideologies.
2026:
Sorry, but you clearly don't understand or perhaps disagree with our concept and criteria of 'notability'. None of what you have written above is relevant to whether or not they should have articles. And the decision at the AfD is supported at
2458:
Its website states that "The goal of the Constitution Party is to restore American jurisprudence to its Biblical foundations and to limit the federal government to its Constitutional boundaries." This has led to its being described as a
1981:
Both left and right are quite capable of calling out those they disagree with. I'm very surprised that SPLC is seen as anything other than left wing ground, but then lots of articles can attract supporters (as this one seems to have).
1915:
SPLC) or by tone of the article. I think that this should be represented within the text, particularly as a lot of Constitution Party supporters seem to hate the label (no matter how deserved - I'm not going to offer an opinion here).
1173:
So right now this labeling misleadingly suggests that CP has ideological affinities with fascism, hierarchical nationalism, etc. In fact, CP is basically a throwback to 19th century U.S. politics. Right-wing, yes, but not "far" right.
1249:
Information about older, defunct parties with the same name is irrelevant to this article. Unless there are NPOV citations establishing that these other organizations are related in some way, we should refrain from mentioning them.
166:
1228:
of the American Independent Party of California from the Constitution Party by the affirmative act of affiliating with America's Independent Party which later changed its name to America's Party. This article gets that wrong too.
2750:
OR Books is one of those things where you have to make case by case decisions, as some of its authors look pretty good. I think we can say it is decribed as right wing by Blumenthal and the SPLC, but not in the first paragraph.
4940:
Sigh I understand this is Knowledge (XXG) so there’s a massive bias but they are only opposed to illegal immigration not giving every illegal immigrant free citizenship doesn’t mean your against ALL immigration in general
1696:
We do go by what sources say though, right? We don't decide ourselves what it is. And far right is different from ultra-right, lke the NSM, etc. So we say how it has been described, not what we ourselves see it as.
3158:
You might be onto something. I agree that the list of ideologies should have some logic behind the order. Maybe we could put Paleoconservativism at the top in bold and have the rest of them in alphabetical order?
1258:
Both this page and the Libertarian page both claim to be the third largest parties in America. Since the Libertarian Page has three sources, and this page has only 1, I think we should go with the page with more
2187:
I concur with this sentiment. Either Beige, as suggested, or Orange. Websites like Ballotpedia.org frequently use Orange or shades of Orange for the Constitution Party and the Conservative Party of New York.
2252:
Which ones DO call it theocratic? You and I have both been around long enough to know that the search results won't mean much if we don't know which ones use the term specifically in reference to the party.
1176:
Ideally we could provide a more enlightening introductory paragraph, which doesn't give a good sense of what the party actually stands for. Hopefully I'll get to some of this clean-up in the next few days.
1561:? That's a sweepingly meaningless statement. "Conservative" covers a lot of ground, and there is no centrist faction or element in the Constitution Party whatsoever. They are right-wing and proud of it. --
1870:
I suggest adding the presidential ticket (names) to the table of Election Results for President. (I would still retain the "Presidential tickets" section, but this could also be done by merging the two.)
1501:
If we accept, for the sake of argument, your claim that the listing was "Policies, concepts and generic phrases, not ideologies", where do policies like Isolationism and Protectionism gain legitimacy?
247:
1811:
I removed the sentence containing the Southern Poverty Law Center. This type of critique is inappropriate in an Overview section, which should simply be used to describe the subject of the article.
5137:
4980:
4744:
4651:
3060:
This is late, and likely to go unnoticed, but this discussion needs to be revisited. The article is currently categorized in "far right" and "right wing populist" categories. It can't be both.
57:
5012:
378:
160:
3173:
That's probably the best idea. This is primarily a paleoconservative, theocratic party. Those should receive primary attention to distinguish it from more mainstream, non-paleo groups.
5087:
4578:
1458:
For Willard A. Mullins an ideology should be contrasted with the related (but different) issues of utopia and historical myth. An ideology is composed of four basic characteristics:
5142:
5037:
4094:
3766:
395:
3515:
5082:
1307:
have partisan registration, than it's the CP by raw number count, due purely to California. If you do not do anything of the sort, I'd say that the Libbies are probably the
1211:
say the least. One view of national parties is that they are coalitions of State parties, associated mainly to address national elections for Congress & the Presidency.
585:
565:
463:
459:
4210:
3250:
I agree theocracy is a bit too far as well. Doesn't change this is a party heavily influenced by the religious right, but they aren't arguing for anything like, say, Iran.
5132:
3684:
740:
722:
702:
2934:
203:
4509:
4505:
4491:
4399:
4395:
4381:
4279:
4275:
4261:
3415:
2947:
I agree. To be fair, this discussion should remain open until we hear from at least one of the editors that keep removing the 'far-right' label. Just trying to prevent
1461:
it must have power over cognition it must be capable of guiding one's evaluations; it must provide guidance towards action; and it must be logically coherent.
1113:
1011:
679:
431:
5052:
2359:
Blumenthal's fingerprints on it, can we really support this more strongly than saying "conservative"? Are we essentially letting one guy set the tone of this article?
590:
1094:
862:
4017:
3896:
3637:
3102:"Laissez-faire" before "Libertarianism" in the Libertarian Party's infobox. Republican and Democratic ideologies reflect both a logical and an alphabetic order. --
5057:
5042:
5007:
421:
385:
5127:
5097:
5072:
3746:
3736:
3668:
1084:
852:
669:
92:
983:
937:
546:
5077:
5032:
5017:
4846:
I know I've said this before, but this where I stand right now. I was told to bring this discussion here to see if it is possible to unmerge the articles.
3525:
1617:
1600:
Some people keep changing 'right wing' to 'far right'. We can discuss this here and try to reach a consensus. I don't believe the Constitution Party to be
3224:
Uhm, why? Fiscal conservatism is connected to Paleconservatism, while Christian right is not. Not a bid deal, anyway: you can go ahead with your order. --
2218:
position should change, but as it stands, I think the term is very loaded and doesn't belong in the first sentence of the lead based on a single article.
645:
390:
5147:
5102:
5027:
536:
4477:
4104:
3485:
1846:
of the party, which is inappropriate in the Overview section. I wouldn't say it even belongs in the article, nevertheless, at your request, I moved it.
1289:
Many of the United States' largest states don't require voters to register by political party; so figures are distorted by accidents of local practice.
1060:
828:
3786:
5112:
5047:
4890:
4869:
973:
3545:
98:
5002:
3425:
1583:
trade and against interventionism), they tend to do so with a conservative worldview- not because they are "liberal" or "centrist" on the issue.
945:
4095:
https://web.archive.org/web/20090203104328/http://www.standardspeaker.com:80/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=7195&Itemid=2
5122:
5117:
5092:
5067:
5062:
3767:
http://web.archive.org/web/20090203104328/http://www.standardspeaker.com:80/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=7195&Itemid=2
2441:
181:
3555:
636:
613:
512:
361:
322:
148:
3516:
https://web.archive.org/20090203104328/http://www.standardspeaker.com:80/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=7195&Itemid=2
3395:
1051:
1006:
819:
780:
3144:
Dominion Theology. I have some douts about mentioning the latter because it is not exactly an ideology, but it is ultimately OK with me. --
2199:
43:
1516:
I agree. It's fair to leave those isms out of the ideology box. Those are policies/values and are already covered with Paleoconservatism.
4367:
4078:
3806:
3455:
2798:
How is "right-wing" a pejorative? Calling a party left, center, or right is a common manner of categorizing groups in political science.
266:. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see
4942:
4719:
3685:
http://web.archive.org/web/20100715035202/http://www.allbusiness.com:80/government/elections-politics-campaigns-elections/5952222-1.html
3340:
3326:
3312:
3297:
1751:
1543:
1502:
1471:
1260:
4984:
3026:
It looks like the use of "Far right" in the sources isn't meant to be a weasel word, it's just used to associate them with groups like
941:
5107:
5022:
4748:
4655:
4461:
4341:
4225:
4032:
3911:
3652:
3367:
2682:
2636:
2612:
2306:
1678:
1150:
1142:
373:
263:
37:
4098:
3796:
3770:
3519:
3416:
https://web.archive.org/20100715035202/http://www.allbusiness.com:80/government/elections-politics-campaigns-elections/5952222-1.html
3042:, etc. due to their more anticommunist, nationalistic and anti-immigration views compared to the center-right. This puts them to the
112:
4961:
4487:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
4377:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
4257:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
3126:
2148:
2126:
2067:
4571:
1336:
which primary a voter wished to participate in during a given electoral cycle. Here are some possible ways to evaluate party size:
949:
925:
885:
503:
454:
117:
33:
4058:
142:
3700:
3122:
3118:
1892:
1798:
1794:
369:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
2960:
1412:. After all, the party was started as a vehicle for Pat Buchanan and he and the press both describes himself using those terms.
87:
3688:
3495:
3419:
1389:
1283:
1268:
297:
3776:
3747:
http://web.archive.org/web/20140209001056/http://www.constitutionparty.com/our-principles/2012-2016-platform-and-resolutions/
3737:
http://web.archive.org/web/20140209001056/http://www.constitutionparty.com/our-principles/2012-2016-platform-and-resolutions/
3669:
http://web.archive.org/web/20140209001056/http://www.constitutionparty.com/our-principles/2012-2016-platform-and-resolutions/
2588:
1153:
on March 15, 2014 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see
138:
78:
4898:- basically they're a tiny state party branch with few members and little electoral interest who've hardly done anything -
3435:
2196:
1613:
4817:
4048:
3405:
4586:
4552:
4442:
4322:
4190:
4084:
4068:
3526:
https://web.archive.org/20111025083225/http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&VideoID=40277549
188:
3756:
3726:
3710:
3339:
More alterations involving almost complete rewrite. Removed critcism and actually discussed the party and its intents.
3210:
This order seems more logical: Paleoconsevatism, Christian right, Social conservatism, Fiscal conservatism, Theocracy.
243:
3750:
3740:
3672:
2813:
government of Iran would happily call itself a theocracy, but in the U.S. or U.K., we often condemn such governments.
4478:
https://web.archive.org/web/20160623180602/http://jrmyersforpresident.com/brief-history-alaska-constitution-party-acp
4105:
https://web.archive.org/web/20061116040533/http://sos.mt.gov/ELB/archives/2006/elections/general/house/hd12/index.asp
3486:
https://web.archive.org/20131112045836/http://www.timeswv.com/local/x1612551382/Independent-voters-may-request-ballot
4251:
3787:
http://web.archive.org/web/20061116040533/http://sos.mt.gov/ELB/archives/2006/elections/general/house/hd12/index.asp
3529:
3475:
3465:
3035:
3027:
2084:
198:
4773:
4611:
122:
3546:
https://web.archive.org/20120205234336/http://sos.mt.gov/ELB/archives/2006/elections/general/house/hd12/index.asp
3505:
3489:
3215:
3164:
3134:
3051:
2956:
2905:
1930:
1795:
Which descriptor, if any, can be added in front of Southern Poverty Law Center when referenced in other articles?
1770:
1736:
1521:
1491:
4643:
Change "selected Phillips as its presidential nominee thrice" to "selected Phillips as its presidential nominee
4508:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
4398:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
4278:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
2948:
1604:
as they do not openly advocate oppression against any groups of people. They also do not embrace ideas like the
212:
2381:
I gather you haven't looked for sources calling it right wing? Leaving it for others to do? I will later then.
2203:
1952:
On the Blumenthal quote, I think it's safer to take that citation out as it seems to be incidental to the book.
3927:
3535:
3426:
https://web.archive.org/20140317062545/http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/07/12/montana-constitution-party-bolts/
2822:
2807:
2767:
2475:
2350:
303:
154:
4946:
4851:
4723:
4481:
4108:
3790:
3549:
1264:
4693:
4582:
4543:
4469:
4433:
4349:
4313:
4233:
4181:
4040:
3919:
3660:
3344:
3330:
3316:
3301:
3259:
3182:
3039:
2849:
1765:
That's your opinion. Your opinion doesn't override the reliable sources. The information has been restored.
1755:
1547:
1506:
1475:
4965:
4715:
4636:
Change "The Constitution Party, formerly the U.S. Taxpayers' Party until 1999" to "The Constitution Party,
4357:
3556:
https://web.archive.org/20120612060523/http://www.helenair.com/articles/2006/11/09/montana/a01110906_02.txt
3445:
2302:
2136:
2114:
2055:
1539:
4903:
4465:
3694:
3429:
3031:
2996:
to the CP, I suspect that it's just an attempt to associate the CP with more radical political positions.
2310:
1682:
1385:
3396:
https://web.archive.org/20150204232743/http://constitutionpartyil.com/index.php/about-us/party-leadership
68:
4926:
4847:
4527:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
4515:
4417:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
4405:
4297:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
4285:
4165:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
4122:
3994:
3974:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
3873:
3853:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
3610:
3590:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
3559:
2763:
2710:
2411:
2364:
2277:
2258:
2223:
2144:
2122:
2080:
2063:
2016:
1851:
1816:
1663:
1059:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
827:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
644:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
511:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
4709:
4468:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
4348:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
4241:
4232:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
4039:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
3918:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
3659:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
1825:
I restored it, since it does describe the party; where else in the article would you say it belongs? --
83:
4838:
Discussing the Unmerging of the Constitution Party of North Carolina from the National Party's Article
4368:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120118234526/http://wisconsinconstitutionparty.com/history.php?isadmin=Y
4206:
4079:
http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2009/spring/patriot-groups
4013:
3892:
3807:
http://web.archive.org/web/20080918015120/http://www.missoulian.com/articles/2006/12/07/bnews/br76.txt
3633:
3456:
https://web.archive.org/20131110061820/http://www.wvsd.uscourts.gov/district/opinions/pdf/phillips.pdf
2930:
4798:
4794:
4143:
3952:
3831:
3399:
3211:
3160:
3130:
3072:
3047:
3001:
2952:
2901:
2856:
2833:
2786:
2471:
2386:
2346:
2241:
2178:
2174:
2098:
2036:
1972:
1939:
1904:
1832:
1766:
1732:
1721:
1702:
1646:
1585:
1568:
1517:
1487:
1414:
1381:
1318:
1201:
1181:
353:
1625:
1146:
285:
259:
4922:
1987:
1957:
1920:
1876:
1731:
The claim had several reliable sources cited. You can look at them once I restore the information.
1629:
1437:
1409:
1231:
1214:
1043:
811:
174:
4988:
4969:
4950:
4930:
4907:
4882:
4855:
4831:
4802:
4752:
4727:
4697:
4659:
4590:
4557:
4447:
4327:
4195:
4099:
http://www.standardspeaker.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=7195&Itemid=2
4002:
3881:
3797:
http://web.archive.org/web/20140730014143/http://archive.wzzm13.com/news/story.aspx?storyid=123585
3771:
http://www.standardspeaker.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=7195&Itemid=2
3720:
3618:
3520:
http://www.standardspeaker.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=7195&Itemid=2
3459:
3348:
3334:
3320:
3305:
3282:
3267:
3233:
3219:
3205:
3190:
3168:
3153:
3138:
3111:
3076:
3055:
3005:
2909:
2860:
2837:
2790:
2415:
2390:
2368:
2314:
2281:
2262:
2245:
2227:
2207:
2182:
2152:
2102:
2088:
2071:
2040:
2020:
1991:
1976:
1961:
1943:
1924:
1908:
1880:
1855:
1837:
1820:
1805:
1774:
1759:
1740:
1725:
1706:
1686:
1667:
1651:
1633:
1592:
1573:
1551:
1525:
1510:
1495:
1479:
1441:
1421:
1323:
1239:
1222:
1205:
1185:
4879:
4864:
4689:
4116:
3252:
3175:
3043:
2818:
2803:
2449:
1677:
i'm quite certain the constitution party is a christian supremacist party. is that not far right?
1428:
1275:
1235:
1218:
217:
4512:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
4402:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
4282:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
3810:
337:
316:
4528:
4418:
4298:
4166:
4059:
https://web.archive.org/web/20060824043645/http://www.constitutionparty.com:80/news.php?aid=294
3975:
3854:
3591:
2500:
726:, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to
4899:
4371:
3701:
http://web.archive.org/web/20060824043645/http://www.constitutionparty.com:80/news.php?aid=294
3377:
2679:
2633:
2609:
2585:
2488:
1405:
216:
64:
2079:
You'd need a compelling reason to overturn the decision of the now-closed AFD and DelReview.
1447:
If anyone wonders of ideology, the following definitions are listed on the wikipedia article
4827:
4758:
Semi-protected edit request on 21 March 2023 128,914 is the registration from December 2022.
3990:
3869:
3606:
3496:
https://web.archive.org/20090204181044/http://www.amconmag.com:80/2004/2004_11_08/cover.html
3278:
3229:
3201:
3149:
3107:
2759:
2536:
2425:
2407:
2360:
2273:
2254:
2219:
2140:
2118:
2059:
2012:
1847:
1812:
1659:
1464:
Terry Eagleton outlines (more or less in no particular order) some definitions of ideology:
1279:
734:
214:
4895:
4740:
4535:
4425:
4305:
4173:
3982:
3861:
3800:
3689:
http://www.allbusiness.com/government/elections-politics-campaigns-elections/5952222-1.html
3598:
3420:
http://www.allbusiness.com/government/elections-politics-campaigns-elections/5952222-1.html
2028:
1716:
Just out of curiosity, where is it specifically described as far right and not right wing?
555:
4202:
4009:
3888:
3777:
http://web.archive.org/web/20101113014520/http://my.execpc.com:80/~awallace/schoolguns.htm
3629:
3385:
3061:
2997:
2926:
2852:
2829:
2782:
2739:
2723:
2467:
2382:
2342:
2237:
2094:
2093:
Yes, that decision was made through due process and an appeal denied through due process.
2032:
1968:
1935:
1900:
1826:
1746:
Far Right was removed. The Party fits ZERO of the traits as listed in the Knowledge (XXG)
1717:
1698:
1640:
1562:
1404:
oversimplification. The best way to describe the views of the Constitution Party might be
1312:
1197:
1177:
916:
495:
4567:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
3436:
https://web.archive.org/20120217054418/http://www.constitutionparty.com/news.php?aid=294
2197:
https://ballotpedia.org/United_States_House_of_Representatives_election_in_Wyoming,_2016
1451:
David W. Minar describes six different ways in which the word "ideology" has been used:
4494:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
4384:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
4264:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
4201:
Successful, except the 5th and 6th links (jimgilchrist.com and standardspeaker.com). --
2781:. It mentions theocratic but doesn't put it in the lead. Two other sources there also.
2652:
2630:
Crimes of Dissent: Civil Disobedience, Criminal Justice, and the Politics of Conscience
1983:
1953:
1916:
1872:
1605:
1433:
4534:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
4501:
4424:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
4391:
4304:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
4271:
4172:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
4049:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120211200123/http://www.sos.idaho.gov:80/elect/other.htm
3981:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
3860:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
3597:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
3406:
https://web.archive.org/20141006001443/http://www.ustpm.org:80/contact/41-contact.html
2164:
Can someone explain to me why it was somehow decided to use a shade of violet/purple (
714:
696:
489:
479:
448:
4996:
4876:
4085:
https://web.archive.org/web/20071011041501/http://jimgilchrist.com:80/blog/?page_id=3
4069:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110930215543/http://www.constitutionpartync.com/sec.htm
3499:
2814:
2799:
2445:
641:
366:
4960:
it should be pointed out that this was before party was founded and why it is there
4062:
3757:
http://web.archive.org/web/20071011041501/http://jimgilchrist.com:80/blog/?page_id=3
3727:
http://web.archive.org/web/20110930215543/http://www.constitutionpartync.com/sec.htm
3711:
http://web.archive.org/web/20110930215543/http://www.constitutionpartync.com/sec.htm
3704:
3439:
3751:
http://www.constitutionparty.com/our-principles/2012-2016-platform-and-resolutions/
3741:
http://www.constitutionparty.com/our-principles/2012-2016-platform-and-resolutions/
3673:
http://www.constitutionparty.com/our-principles/2012-2016-platform-and-resolutions/
1896:
1295:
you accept that the AIP in California is still a Constitution Party affiliate, and
1056:
824:
2512:
2110:
I live in the state and well knowledgeable about all political parties in Idaho.
4252:
http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&VideoID=40277549
3530:
http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&VideoID=40277549
3476:
https://web.archive.org/20110930215543/http://www.constitutionpartync.com/sec.htm
3466:
https://web.archive.org/20110930215543/http://www.constitutionpartync.com/sec.htm
2698:
1536:
This is a conservative party and conservative parties are labeled center right.
1455:
meaning, whose purpose is persuasion; and As the locus of social interaction.
4822:
3780:
3274:
3225:
3197:
3145:
3103:
628:
607:
3678:
3409:
1658:
I would agree that right wing is appropriate and that "far right" is more POV.
1103:
910:
4500:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
4390:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
4270:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
3506:
https://web.archive.org/20120216145455/http://jimgilchrist.com/blog/?page_id=3
3490:
http://www.timeswv.com/local/x1612551382/Independent-voters-may-request-ballot
2918:
2884:
2874:
2523:
2460:
2438:
1621:
1033:
1027:
1000:
906:
801:
795:
774:
485:
343:
4072:
3730:
3714:
3479:
3469:
2562:
2192:
738:
and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit
2922:
2893:
2888:
2879:
1747:
1609:
1601:
1037:
900:
879:
4052:
3928:
http://web.archive.org/web/20120508060053/http://www.constitutionparty.com/
3536:
https://web.archive.org/20100529075205/http://politics1.com:80/const04a.htm
2330:
We now have the party called a conservative party with a source that says
1967:
predecessor was also theocratic, so take it out and that bit is unsourced.
1578:
Agree with OrangeMike... if anything, the Constitution Party is a reaction
365:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
4640:
the U.S. Taxpayers' Party until 1999" – "Formerly...until" is bad grammar.
4482:
http://jrmyersforpresident.com/brief-history-alaska-constitution-party-acp
4109:
http://sos.mt.gov/ELB/archives/2006/elections/general/house/hd12/index.asp
4088:
3791:
http://sos.mt.gov/ELB/archives/2006/elections/general/house/hd12/index.asp
3760:
3550:
http://sos.mt.gov/ELB/archives/2006/elections/general/house/hd12/index.asp
3509:
936:-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us
1802:
1448:
932:
728:
508:
4358:
https://web.archive.org/web/20131203005610/http://www.cpky.net/index.php
3446:
https://web.archive.org/20140726195022/http://www.iapn.org/officers.html
3382:
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add
2870:
We have had the following apply at different times over the past month:
2195:
For example, the Constitution Party candidate gets an Orange icon here:
3695:
http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/07/12/montana-constitution-party-bolts/
3430:
http://thirdpartywatch.com/2006/07/12/montana-constitution-party-bolts/
2236:
although not all of the references to theocratic are about this party.
4865:
User talk:RoySmith#Undeleting The Constitution Party of North Carolina
4160:
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
3969:
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
3848:
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
3585:
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
1427:
Far right again. What do we mean by far right? The definition in the
4710:
https://en.wikipedia.org/2016_United_States_Senate_election_in_Idaho
4242:
https://web.archive.org/web/20140525142340/http://www.cpmontana.org/
4123:
http://www.helenair.com/articles/2006/11/09/montana/a01110906_02.txt
3931:
3560:
http://www.helenair.com/articles/2006/11/09/montana/a01110906_02.txt
3539:
3449:
2466:
Can we go through those sources and agree what we can use and how?
575:
3400:
http://constitutionpartyil.com/index.php/about-us/party-leadership
3390:
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
2676:
Republican Gomorrah: Inside the Movement That Shattered the Party
4563:
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
4361:
3721:
http://www.wvsd.uscourts.gov/district/opinions/pdf/phillips.pdf
3460:
http://www.wvsd.uscourts.gov/district/opinions/pdf/phillips.pdf
2132:
Also Im talking about the Idaho CP party not the Alabama one.
4761:
4599:
1130:
279:
226:
218:
28:
15:
1842:
Actually, it doesn't describe the party. It gives the SPLC's
4245:
4128:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
3937:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
3816:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
3811:
http://www.missoulian.com/articles/2006/12/07/bnews/br76.txt
3565:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
2501:
http://www.electionstudies.org/nesguide/toptable/tab2a_1.htm
1620:. The Constitution Party also had a prominent black member,
1102:
574:
554:
4372:
http://wisconsinconstitutionparty.com/history.php?isadmin=Y
2489:
http://www.fec.gov/pubrec/fe2012/federalelections2012.shtml
2051:
If we unmark this for merge i will keep this page active.
4472:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
4352:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
4236:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
4043:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
3922:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
3663:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
2233:
This is discussed a bit above. There are other sources at
3626:
except the 4th, 10th, 12th, 14th, and 16th archived URLs.
3801:
http://archive.wzzm13.com/news/story.aspx?storyid=123585
3366:
I have just added archive links to 17 external links on
2917:
Personally, I think the party should be referred to as "
4345:
4229:
4036:
3915:
3656:
3371:
3098:
2779:
1154:
271:
267:
238:
173:
4870:
Talk:Constitution Party of North Carolina#Restoration
3311:
Registering a continued intent to alter the opening.
2848:"The CPNV is not affiliated with any national party."
1612:, which are common among far-right parties like the
930:, a project to improve Knowledge (XXG)'s articles on
750:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Elections and Referendums
5138:
Unknown-importance Charismatic Christianity articles
2606:
Quiverfull: Inside the Christian Patriarchy Movement
1055:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
823:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
640:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
507:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
4504:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
4394:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
4274:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
187:
4979:60.080 Number of votes recived need to be updated
3500:http://www.amconmag.com/2004/2004_11_08/cover.html
4063:http://www.constitutionparty.com/news.php?aid=294
3705:http://www.constitutionparty.com/news.php?aid=294
3440:http://www.constitutionparty.com/news.php?aid=294
5013:C-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
1245:Unrelated parties with name "Constitution Party"
46:for general discussion of the article's subject.
4632:Please make the following changes in the lead:
2513:http://www.fec.gov/pubrec/fe2012/tables2012.pdf
1301:you go by total figures only from states which
1191:Affiliation with the American Independent Party
5088:WikiProject Elections and Referendums articles
4820:that support the change you want to be made. —
4577:Participate in the deletion discussion at the
4490:This message was posted before February 2018.
4380:This message was posted before February 2018.
4260:This message was posted before February 2018.
1895:, is evidently committed to the principles of
753:Template:WikiProject Elections and Referendums
5143:WikiProject Charismatic Christianity articles
5038:Unknown-importance American politics articles
3781:http://my.execpc.com/~awallace/schoolguns.htm
2160:A New Color Scheme for the Constitution Party
1559:conservative parties are labeled center right
8:
3679:http://www.ustpm.org/contact/41-contact.html
3410:http://www.ustpm.org/contact/41-contact.html
2699:"Meet Sarah Palin's radical right-wing pals"
1532:Political position of the Constitution Party
2524:http://press.princeton.edu/titles/1832.html
1618:National Socialist Movement (United States)
5083:C-Class Elections and Referendums articles
4713:
4596:Semi-protected edit request on 30 May 2021
4460:I have just modified one external link on
4073:http://www.constitutionpartync.com/sec.htm
3910:I have just modified one external link on
3731:http://www.constitutionpartync.com/sec.htm
3715:http://www.constitutionpartync.com/sec.htm
3651:I have just modified 16 external links on
3480:http://www.constitutionpartync.com/sec.htm
3470:http://www.constitutionpartync.com/sec.htm
2300:
2193:https://ballotpedia.org/Constitution_Party
1253:
995:
874:
769:
691:
602:
443:
311:
5133:C-Class Charismatic Christianity articles
4891:Talk:Constitution Party of North Carolina
4340:I have just modified 2 external links on
4224:I have just modified 2 external links on
4031:I have just modified 7 external links on
2191:The info box on Ballotpedia uses Orange:
1866:Add presidential ticket (names) to table?
654:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Organizations
406:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject United States
4647:" – "Thrice" is archaic and pretentious.
4053:http://www.sos.idaho.gov/elect/other.htm
2851:- if they say so, we should believe it.
2582:Delirium: The Politics of Sex in America
1069:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Christianity
837:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Conservatism
5053:Mid-importance political party articles
4981:2A02:A318:21A9:AD80:FAA4:8B7E:12D7:7602
4712:got the best result in a senate race.
4089:http://jimgilchrist.com/blog/?page_id=3
3761:http://jimgilchrist.com/blog/?page_id=3
3510:http://jimgilchrist.com/blog/?page_id=3
2481:
997:
876:
771:
693:
604:
445:
313:
283:
4745:2001:8003:34A3:800:7189:687C:C16E:93B5
4652:2001:BB6:4713:4858:4191:F852:ABEE:12EC
2735:
2731:
2719:
2708:
2653:"Constitution Party National Platform"
2006:A Bottom Up, Not Top Down Organization
5058:Political parties task force articles
5043:American politics task force articles
5008:Mid-importance United States articles
4140:to let others know (documentation at
3949:to let others know (documentation at
3828:to let others know (documentation at
2563:"Will Roy Moore crack the Bush base?"
1799:Southern Poverty Law Center talk page
1375:ELECTORAL WINNERS / ELECTED OFFICIALS
1254:This can't be the third largest party
723:WikiProject Elections and Referendums
7:
5128:Low-importance Christianity articles
5098:Low-importance Conservatism articles
5073:Low-importance organization articles
2632:. New York University Press. p. 50.
1801:. Your participation is welcomed. –
1114:WikiProject Charismatic Christianity
1049:This article is within the scope of
958:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Religion
922:This article is within the scope of
817:This article is within the scope of
720:This article is within the scope of
634:This article is within the scope of
521:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Politics
501:This article is within the scope of
359:This article is within the scope of
4708:It seems that the candidate in the
302:It is of interest to the following
36:for discussing improvements to the
5078:WikiProject Organizations articles
5033:C-Class American politics articles
5018:WikiProject United States articles
4462:Constitution Party (United States)
4342:Constitution Party (United States)
4226:Constitution Party (United States)
4033:Constitution Party (United States)
3912:Constitution Party (United States)
3653:Constitution Party (United States)
3368:Constitution Party (United States)
3291:Opening the article with Criticism
3125:. However you are right about the
2778:I agree. Here's an earlier version
1311:biggest third party in the U.S. --
1151:Constitution Party (United States)
1143:Constitution Party (United States)
756:Elections and Referendums articles
657:Template:WikiProject Organizations
409:Template:WikiProject United States
264:Constitution Party (United States)
38:Constitution Party (United States)
14:
5148:WikiProject Christianity articles
5103:WikiProject Conservatism articles
5028:High-importance politics articles
4464:. Please take a moment to review
4344:. Please take a moment to review
4228:. Please take a moment to review
4035:. Please take a moment to review
3932:http://www.constitutionparty.com/
3914:. Please take a moment to review
3655:. Please take a moment to review
3540:http://politics1.com/const04a.htm
3450:http://www.iapn.org/officers.html
3370:. Please take a moment to review
2448:, also described as being on the
1072:Template:WikiProject Christianity
840:Template:WikiProject Conservatism
63:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
5113:Low-importance Religion articles
5048:C-Class political party articles
4808:
4765:
4679:
4666:
4603:
4151:
3960:
3839:
3576:
1893:U.S. Taxpayers Party of Michigan
1785:
1624:, for a short period of time. --
1134:
1036:
1026:
999:
909:
899:
878:
804:
794:
773:
713:
695:
627:
606:
488:
478:
447:
346:
336:
315:
284:
230:
58:Click here to start a new topic.
4250:Corrected formatting/usage for
4077:Corrected formatting/usage for
3887:All of them were successful. --
3719:Corrected formatting/usage for
3693:Corrected formatting/usage for
3677:Corrected formatting/usage for
3117:That statement is true for the
2866:Dispute over political position
2463:party, as was its predecessor.
1089:This article has been rated as
978:This article has been rated as
857:This article has been rated as
674:This article has been rated as
541:This article has been rated as
426:This article has been rated as
5003:C-Class United States articles
4989:19:58, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
4970:12:19, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
3044:right of mainstream right-wing
2561:Clarkson, Fred (May 5, 2004).
1806:16:37, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
1593:22:14, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
1574:13:14, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
1552:09:31, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
1395:Ideology of Constitution Party
1:
5123:C-Class Christianity articles
5118:WikiProject Religion articles
5093:C-Class Conservatism articles
5068:C-Class organization articles
5063:WikiProject Politics articles
4931:16:53, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
4645:in three successive elections
4362:http://www.cpky.net/index.php
4196:02:02, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
3321:16:32, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
3306:20:45, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
3283:08:55, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
3077:14:38, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
2103:09:14, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
2089:00:30, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
2072:23:19, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
2041:18:57, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
2021:14:16, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
1881:15:08, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
1856:00:00, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
1838:19:30, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
1821:15:57, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
1614:American Third Position Party
1422:10:50, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
1111:This article is supported by
1063:and see a list of open tasks.
961:Template:WikiProject Religion
831:and see a list of open tasks.
648:and see a list of open tasks.
583:This article is supported by
563:This article is supported by
524:Template:WikiProject Politics
515:and see a list of open tasks.
55:Put new text under old text.
4728:22:33, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
4688:#1, which is fine as it is.
4558:15:29, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
4211:21:19, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
2844:Constitution Party of Nevada
2208:00:51, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
1992:14:03, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
1977:13:16, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
1962:12:33, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
1944:11:17, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
1929:The SPLC statement was from
1925:09:07, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
1726:21:50, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
1687:23:54, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
1668:13:10, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
1652:23:41, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
1634:21:04, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
1442:19:19, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
1324:17:34, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
1269:01:15, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
1240:19:56, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
1223:19:36, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
586:Political parties task force
566:American politics task force
239:Constitution Party of Oregon
4788:to reactivate your request.
4776:has been answered. Set the
4626:to reactivate your request.
4614:has been answered. Set the
4572:Constitution Party logo.svg
4448:12:39, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
3619:21:17, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
3349:05:52, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
3335:21:48, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
3268:10:57, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
3234:08:36, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
3220:18:57, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
3206:08:34, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
3191:20:30, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
3169:17:28, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
3154:13:00, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
3139:12:45, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
3112:12:32, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
2433:The lead used to read: The
2326:POV removal of 'right-wing'
2129:) 17:58, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
1760:00:08, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
5164:
4832:02:49, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
4803:02:48, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
4521:(last update: 5 June 2024)
4457:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
4411:(last update: 5 June 2024)
4337:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
4291:(last update: 5 June 2024)
4221:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
4028:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
4018:14:57, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
3907:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
3897:14:57, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
3648:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
3638:14:48, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
3388:|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
3363:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
3028:American Independent Party
2935:00:09, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
2910:17:19, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
2791:15:59, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
2768:15:22, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
2628:Lovell, Jarret S. (2009).
2608:. Beacon Press. p. 7, 28.
2476:13:32, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
2416:12:22, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
2391:06:25, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
2369:21:36, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
2351:20:53, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
2282:21:31, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
2263:21:13, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
2246:20:57, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
2228:19:01, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
2183:00:05, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
1775:12:01, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
1741:12:01, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
1526:20:59, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
1511:13:52, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
1496:11:55, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
1480:22:08, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
1284:06:31, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
1095:project's importance scale
984:project's importance scale
863:project's importance scale
680:project's importance scale
547:project's importance scale
432:project's importance scale
5108:C-Class Religion articles
5023:C-Class politics articles
4951:00:53, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
4883:16:37, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
4856:14:10, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
4753:07:40, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
4591:09:06, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
4328:20:18, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
4246:http://www.cpmontana.org/
4003:07:57, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
3882:07:51, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
3093:Ideologies in the infobox
3056:03:13, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
2961:16:40, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
2861:13:15, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
2838:12:47, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
2823:21:42, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
2808:21:35, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
2537:"Election 2010 Scorecard"
2325:
2315:21:41, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
2153:20:24, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
1931:The Philadelphia Inquirer
1909:18:57, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
1707:18:16, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
1390:13:12, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
1110:
1088:
1021:
977:
894:
856:
789:
747:Elections and Referendums
708:
703:Elections and Referendums
673:
637:WikiProject Organizations
622:
582:
562:
540:
473:
425:
362:WikiProject United States
331:
310:
270:; for its talk page, see
93:Be welcoming to newcomers
22:Skip to table of contents
4908:16:24, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
4698:16:19, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
4660:14:55, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
3006:20:09, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
2674:Blumenthal, Max (2010).
2584:. Counterpoint. p. 321.
2580:Cohen, Nancy L. (2012).
1639:I concede your point. --
1206:19:53, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
1186:17:31, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
1052:WikiProject Christianity
948:standards, or visit the
820:WikiProject Conservatism
367:United States of America
21:
4837:
4453:External links modified
4333:External links modified
4217:External links modified
4024:External links modified
3903:External links modified
3644:External links modified
3359:External links modified
3040:Christian Liberty Party
2894:Right wing to far-right
2678:. Nation Books. p. 86.
2604:Joyce, Kathryn (2010).
1891:of its affiliates, the
1797:has been posted at the
3032:American Freedom Party
2718:Check date values in:
1107:
579:
559:
412:United States articles
292:This article is rated
88:avoid personal attacks
4861:Related discussions:
2541:National Public Radio
1106:
1075:Christianity articles
843:Conservatism articles
660:organization articles
578:
558:
296:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
113:Neutral point of view
4502:regular verification
4392:regular verification
4272:regular verification
3573:to let others know.
3374:. If necessary, add
3036:American First Party
2655:. Constitution Party
1141:The contents of the
926:WikiProject Religion
504:WikiProject Politics
354:United States portal
258:. Its contents were
254:with a consensus to
118:No original research
4492:After February 2018
4382:After February 2018
4262:After February 2018
4132:parameter below to
3941:parameter below to
3820:parameter below to
3569:parameter below to
1410:Right-wing populism
1044:Christianity portal
812:Conservatism portal
380:Articles Requested!
4936:“Anti immigration”
4583:Community Tech bot
4546:InternetArchiveBot
4497:InternetArchiveBot
4436:InternetArchiveBot
4387:InternetArchiveBot
4316:InternetArchiveBot
4267:InternetArchiveBot
4184:InternetArchiveBot
3325:Altering Opening.
2730:Unknown parameter
2435:Constitution Party
1429:Far-right politics
1357:CANDIDATES FIELDED
1108:
938:assess and improve
580:
560:
298:content assessment
242:was nominated for
99:dispute resolution
60:
4894:coverage to pass
4792:
4791:
4734:Edit to reference
4730:
4718:comment added by
4630:
4629:
4522:
4412:
4292:
4001:
3880:
3624:They all worked,
3617:
3127:Libertarian Party
2317:
2305:comment added by
2156:
2139:comment added by
2131:
2117:comment added by
2075:
2058:comment added by
1542:comment added by
1432:stated beliefs.
1406:Paleoconservatism
1161:
1160:
1129:
1128:
1125:
1124:
1121:
1120:
994:
993:
990:
989:
964:Religion articles
952:for more details.
873:
872:
869:
868:
768:
767:
764:
763:
690:
689:
686:
685:
601:
600:
597:
596:
527:politics articles
464:Political parties
442:
441:
438:
437:
278:
277:
225:
224:
79:Assume good faith
56:
27:
26:
5155:
4914:Immigration laws
4818:reliable sources
4812:
4811:
4783:
4779:
4769:
4768:
4762:
4687:
4683:
4682:
4674:
4670:
4669:
4621:
4617:
4607:
4606:
4600:
4556:
4547:
4520:
4519:
4498:
4446:
4437:
4410:
4409:
4388:
4326:
4317:
4290:
4289:
4268:
4194:
4185:
4158:
4155:
4154:
4147:
4120:
3997:
3996:Talk to my owner
3992:
3967:
3964:
3963:
3956:
3876:
3875:Talk to my owner
3871:
3846:
3843:
3842:
3835:
3613:
3612:Talk to my owner
3608:
3583:
3580:
3579:
3389:
3381:
3263:
3256:
3212:Alexander Levian
3186:
3179:
3161:Alexander Levian
3131:Alexander Levian
3123:Democratic Party
3119:Republican Party
3097:AlexanderLevian
3069:
3068:
3065:
3048:Alexander Levian
2744:
2743:
2737:
2733:
2727:
2721:
2716:
2714:
2706:
2695:
2689:
2688:
2671:
2665:
2664:
2662:
2660:
2649:
2643:
2642:
2625:
2619:
2618:
2601:
2595:
2594:
2577:
2571:
2570:
2558:
2552:
2551:
2549:
2547:
2532:
2526:
2521:
2515:
2509:
2503:
2497:
2491:
2486:
2455:There was also:
2171:
2167:
2155:
2133:
2130:
2111:
2081:NewsAndEventsGuy
2074:
2052:
1835:
1829:
1792:
1789:
1788:
1767:Alexander Levian
1733:Alexander Levian
1649:
1643:
1591:
1589:
1571:
1565:
1554:
1518:Alexander Levian
1488:Alexander Levian
1420:
1418:
1321:
1315:
1138:
1137:
1131:
1077:
1076:
1073:
1070:
1067:
1046:
1041:
1040:
1030:
1023:
1022:
1017:
1014:
1003:
996:
966:
965:
962:
959:
956:
950:wikiproject page
919:
914:
913:
903:
896:
895:
890:
882:
875:
845:
844:
841:
838:
835:
814:
809:
808:
807:
798:
791:
790:
785:
777:
770:
758:
757:
754:
751:
748:
741:our project page
735:electoral reform
717:
710:
709:
699:
692:
662:
661:
658:
655:
652:
631:
624:
623:
618:
610:
603:
529:
528:
525:
522:
519:
498:
493:
492:
482:
475:
474:
469:
466:
451:
444:
414:
413:
410:
407:
404:
356:
351:
350:
349:
340:
333:
332:
327:
319:
312:
295:
289:
288:
280:
234:
233:
227:
219:
192:
191:
177:
108:Article policies
29:
16:
5163:
5162:
5158:
5157:
5156:
5154:
5153:
5152:
4993:
4992:
4977:
4958:
4938:
4916:
4840:
4816:please provide
4809:
4781:
4777:
4766:
4760:
4736:
4706:
4680:
4678:
4667:
4665:
4619:
4615:
4604:
4598:
4579:nomination page
4565:
4550:
4545:
4513:
4506:have permission
4496:
4470:this simple FaQ
4455:
4440:
4435:
4403:
4396:have permission
4386:
4350:this simple FaQ
4335:
4320:
4315:
4283:
4276:have permission
4266:
4234:this simple FaQ
4219:
4188:
4183:
4156:
4152:
4141:
4114:
4041:this simple FaQ
4026:
4000:
3995:
3965:
3961:
3950:
3920:this simple FaQ
3905:
3879:
3874:
3844:
3840:
3829:
3661:this simple FaQ
3646:
3616:
3611:
3581:
3577:
3383:
3375:
3361:
3293:
3261:
3254:
3184:
3177:
3095:
3066:
3063:
3062:
2953:AlexanderLevian
2902:AlexanderLevian
2868:
2846:
2748:
2747:
2729:
2717:
2707:
2697:
2696:
2692:
2685:
2673:
2672:
2668:
2658:
2656:
2651:
2650:
2646:
2639:
2627:
2626:
2622:
2615:
2603:
2602:
2598:
2591:
2579:
2578:
2574:
2560:
2559:
2555:
2545:
2543:
2534:
2533:
2529:
2522:
2518:
2510:
2506:
2498:
2494:
2487:
2483:
2442:political party
2328:
2215:
2169:
2165:
2162:
2134:
2112:
2053:
2049:
2008:
1888:
1868:
1833:
1827:
1790:
1786:
1783:
1647:
1641:
1587:
1584:
1569:
1563:
1537:
1534:
1469:
1462:
1456:
1416:
1413:
1397:
1319:
1313:
1274:third-largest.
1256:
1247:
1193:
1166:
1164:Article Quality
1135:
1074:
1071:
1068:
1065:
1064:
1042:
1035:
1015:
1009:
963:
960:
957:
954:
953:
917:Religion portal
915:
908:
888:
842:
839:
836:
833:
832:
810:
805:
803:
783:
755:
752:
749:
746:
745:
659:
656:
653:
650:
649:
616:
543:High-importance
526:
523:
520:
517:
516:
496:Politics portal
494:
487:
468:High‑importance
467:
457:
411:
408:
405:
402:
401:
400:
386:Become a Member
352:
347:
345:
325:
293:
231:
221:
220:
215:
134:
129:
128:
127:
104:
74:
12:
11:
5:
5161:
5159:
5151:
5150:
5145:
5140:
5135:
5130:
5125:
5120:
5115:
5110:
5105:
5100:
5095:
5090:
5085:
5080:
5075:
5070:
5065:
5060:
5055:
5050:
5045:
5040:
5035:
5030:
5025:
5020:
5015:
5010:
5005:
4995:
4994:
4976:
4973:
4957:
4954:
4937:
4934:
4915:
4912:
4911:
4910:
4886:
4885:
4874:
4873:
4872:
4867:
4839:
4836:
4835:
4834:
4790:
4789:
4770:
4759:
4756:
4735:
4732:
4705:
4702:
4701:
4700:
4676:
4649:
4648:
4641:
4628:
4627:
4608:
4597:
4594:
4575:
4574:
4564:
4561:
4540:
4539:
4532:
4485:
4484:
4476:Added archive
4454:
4451:
4430:
4429:
4422:
4375:
4374:
4366:Added archive
4364:
4356:Added archive
4334:
4331:
4310:
4309:
4302:
4255:
4254:
4248:
4240:Added archive
4218:
4215:
4214:
4213:
4178:
4177:
4170:
4126:
4125:
4111:
4103:Added archive
4101:
4093:Added archive
4091:
4083:Added archive
4081:
4075:
4067:Added archive
4065:
4057:Added archive
4055:
4047:Added archive
4025:
4022:
4021:
4020:
3993:
3987:
3986:
3979:
3935:
3934:
3926:Added archive
3904:
3901:
3900:
3899:
3872:
3866:
3865:
3858:
3814:
3813:
3805:Added archive
3803:
3795:Added archive
3793:
3785:Added archive
3783:
3775:Added archive
3773:
3765:Added archive
3763:
3755:Added archive
3753:
3745:Added archive
3743:
3735:Added archive
3733:
3725:Added archive
3723:
3717:
3709:Added archive
3707:
3699:Added archive
3697:
3691:
3683:Added archive
3681:
3675:
3667:Added archive
3645:
3642:
3641:
3640:
3609:
3603:
3602:
3595:
3563:
3562:
3554:Added archive
3552:
3544:Added archive
3542:
3534:Added archive
3532:
3524:Added archive
3522:
3514:Added archive
3512:
3504:Added archive
3502:
3494:Added archive
3492:
3484:Added archive
3482:
3474:Added archive
3472:
3464:Added archive
3462:
3454:Added archive
3452:
3444:Added archive
3442:
3434:Added archive
3432:
3424:Added archive
3422:
3414:Added archive
3412:
3404:Added archive
3402:
3394:Added archive
3360:
3357:
3356:
3355:
3354:
3353:
3352:
3351:
3292:
3289:
3288:
3287:
3286:
3285:
3248:
3247:
3246:
3245:
3244:
3243:
3242:
3241:
3240:
3239:
3238:
3237:
3236:
3094:
3091:
3090:
3089:
3088:
3087:
3086:
3085:
3084:
3083:
3082:
3081:
3080:
3079:
3015:
3014:
3013:
3012:
3011:
3010:
3009:
3008:
2986:
2985:
2984:
2983:
2982:
2981:
2980:
2979:
2968:
2967:
2966:
2965:
2964:
2963:
2940:
2939:
2938:
2937:
2897:
2896:
2891:
2882:
2877:
2867:
2864:
2845:
2842:
2841:
2840:
2796:
2795:
2794:
2793:
2773:
2772:
2771:
2770:
2746:
2745:
2705:. Oct 10 2008.
2703:Salon Magazine
2690:
2684:978-1568584171
2683:
2666:
2644:
2638:978-0814752272
2637:
2620:
2614:978-0807010730
2613:
2596:
2589:
2572:
2567:Salon Magazine
2553:
2527:
2516:
2504:
2492:
2480:
2479:
2423:
2422:
2421:
2420:
2419:
2418:
2398:
2397:
2396:
2395:
2394:
2393:
2374:
2373:
2372:
2371:
2327:
2324:
2323:
2322:
2321:
2320:
2319:
2318:
2291:
2290:
2289:
2288:
2287:
2286:
2285:
2284:
2266:
2265:
2214:
2211:
2200:73.150.184.160
2161:
2158:
2108:
2107:
2106:
2105:
2048:
2045:
2044:
2043:
2007:
2004:
2003:
2002:
2001:
2000:
1999:
1998:
1997:
1996:
1995:
1994:
1950:
1887:
1884:
1867:
1864:
1863:
1862:
1861:
1860:
1859:
1858:
1782:
1779:
1778:
1777:
1744:
1743:
1714:
1713:
1712:
1711:
1710:
1709:
1675:
1674:
1673:
1672:
1671:
1670:
1606:third position
1598:
1597:
1596:
1595:
1533:
1530:
1529:
1528:
1499:
1498:
1466:
1460:
1453:
1445:
1444:
1396:
1393:
1377:
1376:
1368:
1367:
1359:
1358:
1345:
1344:
1340:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1329:
1327:
1326:
1255:
1252:
1246:
1243:
1192:
1189:
1165:
1162:
1159:
1158:
1139:
1127:
1126:
1123:
1122:
1119:
1118:
1109:
1099:
1098:
1091:Low-importance
1087:
1081:
1080:
1078:
1061:the discussion
1048:
1047:
1031:
1019:
1018:
1016:Low‑importance
1004:
992:
991:
988:
987:
980:Low-importance
976:
970:
969:
967:
921:
920:
904:
892:
891:
889:Low‑importance
883:
871:
870:
867:
866:
859:Low-importance
855:
849:
848:
846:
829:the discussion
816:
815:
799:
787:
786:
784:Low‑importance
778:
766:
765:
762:
761:
759:
718:
706:
705:
700:
688:
687:
684:
683:
676:Low-importance
672:
666:
665:
663:
646:the discussion
632:
620:
619:
617:Low‑importance
611:
599:
598:
595:
594:
591:Mid-importance
581:
571:
570:
561:
551:
550:
539:
533:
532:
530:
513:the discussion
500:
499:
483:
471:
470:
452:
440:
439:
436:
435:
428:Mid-importance
424:
418:
417:
415:
399:
398:
393:
388:
383:
376:
374:Template Usage
370:
358:
357:
341:
329:
328:
326:Mid‑importance
320:
308:
307:
301:
290:
276:
275:
250:was closed on
248:The discussion
235:
223:
222:
213:
211:
210:
207:
206:
194:
193:
131:
130:
126:
125:
120:
115:
106:
105:
103:
102:
95:
90:
81:
75:
73:
72:
61:
52:
51:
48:
47:
41:
25:
24:
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
5160:
5149:
5146:
5144:
5141:
5139:
5136:
5134:
5131:
5129:
5126:
5124:
5121:
5119:
5116:
5114:
5111:
5109:
5106:
5104:
5101:
5099:
5096:
5094:
5091:
5089:
5086:
5084:
5081:
5079:
5076:
5074:
5071:
5069:
5066:
5064:
5061:
5059:
5056:
5054:
5051:
5049:
5046:
5044:
5041:
5039:
5036:
5034:
5031:
5029:
5026:
5024:
5021:
5019:
5016:
5014:
5011:
5009:
5006:
5004:
5001:
5000:
4998:
4991:
4990:
4986:
4982:
4974:
4972:
4971:
4967:
4963:
4955:
4953:
4952:
4948:
4944:
4943:50.159.11.159
4935:
4933:
4932:
4928:
4924:
4920:
4913:
4909:
4905:
4901:
4897:
4892:
4888:
4887:
4884:
4881:
4878:
4875:
4871:
4868:
4866:
4863:
4862:
4860:
4859:
4858:
4857:
4853:
4849:
4848:Average Ninja
4844:
4833:
4829:
4825:
4824:
4819:
4815:
4807:
4806:
4805:
4804:
4800:
4796:
4787:
4784:parameter to
4775:
4771:
4764:
4763:
4757:
4755:
4754:
4750:
4746:
4742:
4733:
4731:
4729:
4725:
4721:
4720:84.152.207.85
4717:
4711:
4703:
4699:
4695:
4691:
4690:Beyond My Ken
4686:
4677:
4673:
4664:
4663:
4662:
4661:
4657:
4653:
4646:
4642:
4639:
4635:
4634:
4633:
4625:
4622:parameter to
4613:
4609:
4602:
4601:
4595:
4593:
4592:
4588:
4584:
4580:
4573:
4570:
4569:
4568:
4562:
4560:
4559:
4554:
4549:
4548:
4537:
4533:
4530:
4526:
4525:
4524:
4517:
4511:
4507:
4503:
4499:
4493:
4488:
4483:
4479:
4475:
4474:
4473:
4471:
4467:
4463:
4458:
4452:
4450:
4449:
4444:
4439:
4438:
4427:
4423:
4420:
4416:
4415:
4414:
4407:
4401:
4397:
4393:
4389:
4383:
4378:
4373:
4369:
4365:
4363:
4359:
4355:
4354:
4353:
4351:
4347:
4343:
4338:
4332:
4330:
4329:
4324:
4319:
4318:
4307:
4303:
4300:
4296:
4295:
4294:
4287:
4281:
4277:
4273:
4269:
4263:
4258:
4253:
4249:
4247:
4243:
4239:
4238:
4237:
4235:
4231:
4227:
4222:
4216:
4212:
4208:
4204:
4200:
4199:
4198:
4197:
4192:
4187:
4186:
4175:
4171:
4168:
4164:
4163:
4162:
4161:
4149:
4145:
4139:
4135:
4131:
4124:
4118:
4112:
4110:
4106:
4102:
4100:
4096:
4092:
4090:
4086:
4082:
4080:
4076:
4074:
4070:
4066:
4064:
4060:
4056:
4054:
4050:
4046:
4045:
4044:
4042:
4038:
4034:
4029:
4023:
4019:
4015:
4011:
4007:
4006:
4005:
4004:
3998:
3991:
3984:
3980:
3977:
3973:
3972:
3971:
3970:
3958:
3954:
3948:
3944:
3940:
3933:
3929:
3925:
3924:
3923:
3921:
3917:
3913:
3908:
3902:
3898:
3894:
3890:
3886:
3885:
3884:
3883:
3877:
3870:
3863:
3859:
3856:
3852:
3851:
3850:
3849:
3837:
3833:
3827:
3823:
3819:
3812:
3808:
3804:
3802:
3798:
3794:
3792:
3788:
3784:
3782:
3778:
3774:
3772:
3768:
3764:
3762:
3758:
3754:
3752:
3748:
3744:
3742:
3738:
3734:
3732:
3728:
3724:
3722:
3718:
3716:
3712:
3708:
3706:
3702:
3698:
3696:
3692:
3690:
3686:
3682:
3680:
3676:
3674:
3670:
3666:
3665:
3664:
3662:
3658:
3654:
3649:
3643:
3639:
3635:
3631:
3627:
3623:
3622:
3621:
3620:
3614:
3607:
3600:
3596:
3593:
3589:
3588:
3587:
3586:
3574:
3572:
3568:
3561:
3557:
3553:
3551:
3547:
3543:
3541:
3537:
3533:
3531:
3527:
3523:
3521:
3517:
3513:
3511:
3507:
3503:
3501:
3497:
3493:
3491:
3487:
3483:
3481:
3477:
3473:
3471:
3467:
3463:
3461:
3457:
3453:
3451:
3447:
3443:
3441:
3437:
3433:
3431:
3427:
3423:
3421:
3417:
3413:
3411:
3407:
3403:
3401:
3397:
3393:
3392:
3391:
3387:
3379:
3373:
3369:
3364:
3358:
3350:
3346:
3342:
3341:173.15.73.108
3338:
3337:
3336:
3332:
3328:
3327:173.15.73.108
3324:
3323:
3322:
3318:
3314:
3313:173.15.73.108
3310:
3309:
3308:
3307:
3303:
3299:
3298:173.15.73.108
3290:
3284:
3280:
3276:
3271:
3270:
3269:
3266:
3265:
3264:
3258:
3257:
3249:
3235:
3231:
3227:
3223:
3222:
3221:
3217:
3213:
3209:
3208:
3207:
3203:
3199:
3194:
3193:
3192:
3189:
3188:
3187:
3181:
3180:
3172:
3171:
3170:
3166:
3162:
3157:
3156:
3155:
3151:
3147:
3142:
3141:
3140:
3136:
3132:
3128:
3124:
3120:
3116:
3115:
3114:
3113:
3109:
3105:
3100:
3092:
3078:
3074:
3070:
3059:
3058:
3057:
3053:
3049:
3045:
3041:
3037:
3033:
3029:
3025:
3024:
3023:
3022:
3021:
3020:
3019:
3018:
3017:
3016:
3007:
3003:
2999:
2994:
2993:
2992:
2991:
2990:
2989:
2988:
2987:
2976:
2975:
2974:
2973:
2972:
2971:
2970:
2969:
2962:
2958:
2954:
2950:
2946:
2945:
2944:
2943:
2942:
2941:
2936:
2932:
2928:
2924:
2920:
2916:
2915:
2914:
2913:
2912:
2911:
2907:
2903:
2895:
2892:
2890:
2886:
2883:
2881:
2878:
2876:
2873:
2872:
2871:
2865:
2863:
2862:
2858:
2854:
2850:
2843:
2839:
2835:
2831:
2827:
2826:
2825:
2824:
2820:
2816:
2810:
2809:
2805:
2801:
2792:
2788:
2784:
2780:
2777:
2776:
2775:
2774:
2769:
2765:
2761:
2756:
2755:
2754:
2753:
2752:
2741:
2725:
2712:
2704:
2700:
2694:
2691:
2686:
2681:
2677:
2670:
2667:
2654:
2648:
2645:
2640:
2635:
2631:
2624:
2621:
2616:
2611:
2607:
2600:
2597:
2592:
2587:
2583:
2576:
2573:
2568:
2564:
2557:
2554:
2542:
2538:
2531:
2528:
2525:
2520:
2517:
2514:
2508:
2505:
2502:
2496:
2493:
2490:
2485:
2482:
2478:
2477:
2473:
2469:
2464:
2462:
2456:
2453:
2451:
2447:
2446:United States
2443:
2440:
2436:
2431:
2430:and others.
2429:
2427:
2417:
2413:
2409:
2404:
2403:
2402:
2401:
2400:
2399:
2392:
2388:
2384:
2380:
2379:
2378:
2377:
2376:
2375:
2370:
2366:
2362:
2357:
2356:
2355:
2354:
2353:
2352:
2348:
2344:
2338:
2334:
2331:
2316:
2312:
2308:
2304:
2297:
2296:
2295:
2294:
2293:
2292:
2283:
2279:
2275:
2270:
2269:
2268:
2267:
2264:
2260:
2256:
2251:
2250:
2249:
2248:
2247:
2243:
2239:
2235:
2232:
2231:
2230:
2229:
2225:
2221:
2212:
2210:
2209:
2205:
2201:
2198:
2194:
2189:
2185:
2184:
2180:
2176:
2159:
2157:
2154:
2150:
2146:
2142:
2138:
2128:
2124:
2120:
2116:
2104:
2100:
2096:
2092:
2091:
2090:
2086:
2082:
2078:
2077:
2076:
2073:
2069:
2065:
2061:
2057:
2046:
2042:
2038:
2034:
2030:
2025:
2024:
2023:
2022:
2018:
2014:
2005:
1993:
1989:
1985:
1980:
1979:
1978:
1974:
1970:
1965:
1964:
1963:
1959:
1955:
1951:
1947:
1946:
1945:
1941:
1937:
1932:
1928:
1927:
1926:
1922:
1918:
1913:
1912:
1911:
1910:
1906:
1902:
1898:
1894:
1885:
1883:
1882:
1878:
1874:
1865:
1857:
1853:
1849:
1845:
1841:
1840:
1839:
1836:
1830:
1824:
1823:
1822:
1818:
1814:
1810:
1809:
1808:
1807:
1804:
1800:
1796:
1780:
1776:
1772:
1768:
1764:
1763:
1762:
1761:
1757:
1753:
1752:173.15.73.108
1749:
1742:
1738:
1734:
1730:
1729:
1728:
1727:
1723:
1719:
1708:
1704:
1700:
1695:
1694:
1693:
1692:
1691:
1690:
1689:
1688:
1684:
1680:
1669:
1665:
1661:
1657:
1656:
1655:
1654:
1653:
1650:
1644:
1638:
1637:
1636:
1635:
1631:
1627:
1623:
1619:
1615:
1611:
1607:
1603:
1594:
1590:
1581:
1577:
1576:
1575:
1572:
1566:
1560:
1557:
1556:
1555:
1553:
1549:
1545:
1544:97.95.129.245
1541:
1531:
1527:
1523:
1519:
1515:
1514:
1513:
1512:
1508:
1504:
1503:173.15.73.108
1497:
1493:
1489:
1484:
1483:
1482:
1481:
1477:
1473:
1472:173.15.73.108
1465:
1459:
1452:
1450:
1443:
1439:
1435:
1430:
1426:
1425:
1424:
1423:
1419:
1411:
1407:
1401:
1394:
1392:
1391:
1387:
1383:
1374:
1373:
1372:
1365:
1364:
1363:
1356:
1355:
1354:
1351:
1342:
1341:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1330:
1325:
1322:
1316:
1310:
1306:
1305:
1300:
1299:
1294:
1293:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1281:
1277:
1271:
1270:
1266:
1262:
1261:99.174.92.174
1251:
1244:
1242:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1229:
1225:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1212:
1208:
1207:
1203:
1199:
1190:
1188:
1187:
1183:
1179:
1174:
1170:
1163:
1156:
1152:
1148:
1144:
1140:
1133:
1132:
1116:
1115:
1105:
1101:
1100:
1096:
1092:
1086:
1083:
1082:
1079:
1062:
1058:
1054:
1053:
1045:
1039:
1034:
1032:
1029:
1025:
1024:
1020:
1013:
1008:
1005:
1002:
998:
985:
981:
975:
972:
971:
968:
951:
947:
943:
939:
935:
934:
929:
928:
927:
918:
912:
907:
905:
902:
898:
897:
893:
887:
884:
881:
877:
864:
860:
854:
851:
850:
847:
830:
826:
822:
821:
813:
802:
800:
797:
793:
792:
788:
782:
779:
776:
772:
760:
743:
742:
737:
736:
731:
730:
725:
724:
719:
716:
712:
711:
707:
704:
701:
698:
694:
681:
677:
671:
668:
667:
664:
651:Organizations
647:
643:
642:Organizations
639:
638:
633:
630:
626:
625:
621:
615:
614:Organizations
612:
609:
605:
592:
589:(assessed as
588:
587:
577:
573:
572:
568:
567:
557:
553:
552:
548:
544:
538:
535:
534:
531:
514:
510:
506:
505:
497:
491:
486:
484:
481:
477:
476:
472:
465:
461:
456:
453:
450:
446:
433:
429:
423:
420:
419:
416:
403:United States
397:
394:
392:
389:
387:
384:
382:
381:
377:
375:
372:
371:
368:
364:
363:
355:
344:
342:
339:
335:
334:
330:
324:
323:United States
321:
318:
314:
309:
305:
299:
291:
287:
282:
281:
273:
269:
265:
261:
257:
253:
252:2 August 2019
249:
245:
241:
240:
236:
229:
228:
209:
208:
205:
202:
200:
196:
195:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
133:
132:
124:
123:Verifiability
121:
119:
116:
114:
111:
110:
109:
100:
96:
94:
91:
89:
85:
82:
80:
77:
76:
70:
66:
65:Learn to edit
62:
59:
54:
53:
50:
49:
45:
39:
35:
31:
30:
23:
20:
18:
17:
4978:
4959:
4939:
4921:
4917:
4900:David Gerard
4845:
4841:
4821:
4813:
4793:
4785:
4774:edit request
4737:
4714:— Preceding
4707:
4704:Best results
4684:
4671:
4650:
4644:
4637:
4631:
4623:
4612:edit request
4576:
4566:
4544:
4541:
4516:source check
4495:
4489:
4486:
4459:
4456:
4434:
4431:
4406:source check
4385:
4379:
4376:
4339:
4336:
4314:
4311:
4286:source check
4265:
4259:
4256:
4223:
4220:
4182:
4179:
4159:
4150:
4137:
4133:
4129:
4127:
4030:
4027:
3988:
3968:
3959:
3946:
3942:
3938:
3936:
3909:
3906:
3867:
3847:
3838:
3825:
3821:
3817:
3815:
3650:
3647:
3625:
3604:
3584:
3575:
3570:
3566:
3564:
3365:
3362:
3294:
3260:
3253:
3251:
3183:
3176:
3174:
3096:
2898:
2869:
2847:
2811:
2797:
2749:
2738:suggested) (
2711:cite journal
2702:
2693:
2675:
2669:
2657:. Retrieved
2647:
2629:
2623:
2605:
2599:
2581:
2575:
2566:
2556:
2544:. Retrieved
2540:
2535:Rudin, Ken.
2530:
2519:
2507:
2495:
2484:
2465:
2457:
2454:
2434:
2432:
2424:
2339:
2335:
2332:
2329:
2307:68.81.75.121
2301:— Preceding
2216:
2190:
2186:
2163:
2135:— Preceding
2113:— Preceding
2109:
2054:— Preceding
2050:
2009:
1897:Biblical law
1889:
1869:
1843:
1784:
1745:
1715:
1679:50.82.219.80
1676:
1599:
1579:
1558:
1538:— Preceding
1535:
1500:
1470:
1463:
1457:
1446:
1402:
1398:
1378:
1369:
1366:PARTISANSHIP
1360:
1349:
1346:
1328:
1308:
1303:
1302:
1297:
1296:
1291:
1290:
1272:
1257:
1248:
1230:
1226:
1213:
1209:
1194:
1175:
1171:
1167:
1112:
1090:
1066:Christianity
1057:Christianity
1050:
1007:Christianity
979:
940:articles to
931:
924:
923:
858:
834:Conservatism
825:conservatism
818:
781:Conservatism
739:
733:
727:
721:
675:
635:
584:
564:
542:
502:
427:
391:Project Talk
379:
360:
304:WikiProjects
255:
251:
237:
197:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
107:
32:This is the
4962:89.64.11.41
4144:Sourcecheck
4008:Success! --
3953:Sourcecheck
3832:Sourcecheck
2949:an edit war
2760:Niteshift36
2732:|coauthors=
2426:Niteshift36
2408:Niteshift36
2361:Niteshift36
2274:Niteshift36
2255:Niteshift36
2220:Niteshift36
2141:Tyler Ricks
2119:Tyler Ricks
2060:Tyler Ricks
2013:Lexington62
1848:Hackercraft
1828:Orange Mike
1813:Hackercraft
1660:Niteshift36
1642:Orange Mike
1564:Orange Mike
1314:Orange Mike
1155:its history
1012:Charismatic
268:its history
161:free images
44:not a forum
4997:Categories
4795:Umbrella12
4778:|answered=
4616:|answered=
4553:Report bug
4443:Report bug
4323:Report bug
4191:Report bug
2998:Monomakhos
2919:Right wing
2885:Right wing
2875:Right wing
2853:Dougweller
2830:Dougweller
2783:Dougweller
2590:1582438013
2468:Dougweller
2461:theocratic
2439:right-wing
2383:Dougweller
2343:Dougweller
2238:Dougweller
2175:Inqvisitor
2095:Dougweller
2033:Dougweller
1969:Dougweller
1936:Dougweller
1901:Dougweller
1886:Theocratic
1718:Redtread95
1699:Dougweller
1622:Alan Keyes
1382:Potentate4
1343:VOTE SHARE
1198:Monomakhos
1178:Monomakhos
1145:page were
4814:Not done:
4536:this tool
4529:this tool
4426:this tool
4419:this tool
4306:this tool
4299:this tool
4203:1990'sguy
4174:this tool
4167:this tool
4117:dead link
4010:1990'sguy
3983:this tool
3976:this tool
3889:1990'sguy
3862:this tool
3855:this tool
3630:1990'sguy
3605:Cheers. —
3599:this tool
3592:this tool
3296:opening.
3262:Nidhiki05
3185:Nidhiki05
2927:1990'sguy
2923:far-right
2889:far-right
2880:Far-right
2734:ignored (
2450:far right
2213:Theocracy
1984:JASpencer
1954:JASpencer
1917:JASpencer
1873:Tripodics
1748:Far Right
1626:Jay942942
1610:racialism
1602:far-right
1586:Victorian
1434:JASpencer
1415:Victorian
1259:evidence.
729:elections
101:if needed
84:Be polite
34:talk page
4975:2020 run
4956:1974 run
4923:Willisio
4889:over at
4877:RoySmith
4716:unsigned
4685:Not done
4542:Cheers.—
4432:Cheers.—
4312:Cheers.—
4180:Cheers.—
3989:Cheers.—
3868:Cheers.—
3378:cbignore
2828:Agreed.
2815:Mics 777
2800:Mics 777
2736:|author=
2303:unsigned
2149:contribs
2137:unsigned
2127:contribs
2115:unsigned
2068:contribs
2056:unsigned
1793:An RfC:
1540:unsigned
1449:ideology
1309:de facto
1232:BraveLad
1215:BraveLad
955:Religion
933:Religion
886:Religion
518:Politics
509:politics
460:American
455:Politics
244:deletion
199:Archives
69:get help
42:This is
40:article.
4466:my edit
4346:my edit
4230:my edit
4130:checked
4121:tag to
4037:my edit
3999::Online
3939:checked
3916:my edit
3878::Online
3818:checked
3657:my edit
3615::Online
3567:checked
3372:my edit
2659:13 July
2546:13 July
2444:in the
2170:#D2B48C
2166:#A356DE
2047:merging
1844:opinion
1616:or the
1580:against
1093:on the
982:on the
861:on the
678:on the
545:on the
430:on the
294:C-class
167:WPÂ refs
155:scholar
4896:WP:ORG
4880:(talk)
4823:C.Fred
4743:edit.
4741:WP:POV
4138:failed
4113:Added
3947:failed
3826:failed
3386:nobots
3275:Checco
3226:Checco
3198:Checco
3146:Checco
3104:Checco
3064:Butler
2720:|date=
2029:WP:DRV
1588:Mutant
1417:Mutant
1276:TheSix
1147:merged
396:Alerts
300:scale.
260:merged
139:Google
4782:|ans=
4772:This
4638:named
4620:|ans=
4610:This
2437:is a
1149:into
262:into
256:merge
182:JSTOR
143:books
97:Seek
4985:talk
4966:talk
4947:talk
4927:talk
4904:talk
4852:talk
4828:talk
4799:talk
4749:talk
4724:talk
4694:talk
4672:Done
4656:talk
4587:talk
4207:talk
4134:true
4014:talk
3943:true
3893:talk
3822:true
3634:talk
3571:true
3345:talk
3331:talk
3317:talk
3302:talk
3279:talk
3230:talk
3216:talk
3202:talk
3165:talk
3150:talk
3135:talk
3121:and
3108:talk
3099:says
3073:talk
3067:Blog
3052:talk
3002:talk
2957:talk
2931:talk
2906:talk
2857:talk
2834:talk
2819:talk
2804:talk
2787:talk
2764:talk
2740:help
2724:help
2680:ISBN
2661:2013
2634:ISBN
2610:ISBN
2586:ISBN
2548:2013
2511:see
2499:see
2472:talk
2412:talk
2387:talk
2365:talk
2347:talk
2311:talk
2278:talk
2259:talk
2242:talk
2224:talk
2204:talk
2179:talk
2145:talk
2123:talk
2099:talk
2085:talk
2064:talk
2037:talk
2017:talk
1988:talk
1973:talk
1958:talk
1940:talk
1921:talk
1905:talk
1877:talk
1852:talk
1834:Talk
1817:talk
1771:talk
1756:talk
1737:talk
1722:talk
1703:talk
1683:talk
1664:talk
1648:Talk
1630:talk
1570:Talk
1548:talk
1522:talk
1507:talk
1492:talk
1476:talk
1438:talk
1386:talk
1320:Talk
1280:talk
1265:talk
1236:talk
1219:talk
1202:talk
1182:talk
944:and
942:good
537:High
272:here
175:FENS
149:news
86:and
4780:or
4618:or
4510:RfC
4480:to
4400:RfC
4370:to
4360:to
4280:RfC
4244:to
4148:).
4136:or
4107:to
4097:to
4087:to
4071:to
4061:to
4051:to
3957:).
3945:or
3930:to
3836:).
3824:or
3809:to
3799:to
3789:to
3779:to
3769:to
3759:to
3749:to
3739:to
3729:to
3713:to
3703:to
3687:to
3671:to
3558:to
3548:to
3538:to
3528:to
3518:to
3508:to
3498:to
3488:to
3478:to
3468:to
3458:to
3448:to
3438:to
3428:to
3418:to
3408:to
3398:to
3255:Toa
3178:Toa
2921:to
2887:to
1803:MrX
1781:RfC
1408:or
1085:Low
974:Low
946:1.0
853:Low
670:Low
422:Mid
246:.
189:TWL
4999::
4987:)
4968:)
4949:)
4929:)
4906:)
4854:)
4830:)
4801:)
4786:no
4751:)
4726:)
4696:)
4675:#2
4658:)
4624:no
4589:)
4581:.
4523:.
4518:}}
4514:{{
4413:.
4408:}}
4404:{{
4293:.
4288:}}
4284:{{
4209:)
4146:}}
4142:{{
4119:}}
4115:{{
4016:)
3955:}}
3951:{{
3895:)
3834:}}
3830:{{
3636:)
3628:--
3384:{{
3380:}}
3376:{{
3347:)
3333:)
3319:)
3304:)
3281:)
3273:--
3232:)
3218:)
3204:)
3196:--
3167:)
3152:)
3137:)
3110:)
3075:)
3054:)
3038:,
3034:,
3030:,
3004:)
2959:)
2951:.
2933:)
2908:)
2859:)
2836:)
2821:)
2806:)
2789:)
2766:)
2728:;
2715::
2713:}}
2709:{{
2701:.
2565:.
2539:.
2474:)
2452:.
2414:)
2389:)
2367:)
2349:)
2313:)
2280:)
2261:)
2244:)
2226:)
2206:)
2181:)
2151:)
2147:•
2125:•
2101:)
2087:)
2070:)
2066:•
2039:)
2031:.
2019:)
1990:)
1975:)
1960:)
1942:)
1923:)
1907:)
1899:.
1879:)
1854:)
1831:|
1819:)
1773:)
1758:)
1750:.
1739:)
1724:)
1705:)
1685:)
1666:)
1645:|
1632:)
1608:,
1567:|
1550:)
1524:)
1509:)
1494:)
1478:)
1440:)
1388:)
1350:If
1317:|
1304:do
1298:if
1292:If
1282:)
1267:)
1238:)
1221:)
1204:)
1184:)
1010::
732:,
593:).
462:/
458::
169:)
67:;
4983:(
4964:(
4945:(
4925:(
4902:(
4850:(
4826:(
4797:(
4747:(
4722:(
4692:(
4654:(
4585:(
4555:)
4551:(
4538:.
4531:.
4445:)
4441:(
4428:.
4421:.
4325:)
4321:(
4308:.
4301:.
4205:(
4193:)
4189:(
4176:.
4169:.
4157:Y
4012:(
3985:.
3978:.
3966:Y
3891:(
3864:.
3857:.
3845:Y
3632:(
3601:.
3594:.
3582:Y
3343:(
3329:(
3315:(
3300:(
3277:(
3228:(
3214:(
3200:(
3163:(
3148:(
3133:(
3106:(
3071:(
3050:(
3000:(
2955:(
2929:(
2904:(
2855:(
2832:(
2817:(
2802:(
2785:(
2762:(
2742:)
2726:)
2722:(
2687:.
2663:.
2641:.
2617:.
2593:.
2569:.
2550:.
2470:(
2410:(
2385:(
2363:(
2345:(
2309:(
2276:(
2257:(
2240:(
2222:(
2202:(
2177:(
2143:(
2121:(
2097:(
2083:(
2062:(
2035:(
2015:(
1986:(
1971:(
1956:(
1938:(
1919:(
1903:(
1875:(
1850:(
1815:(
1791:B
1769:(
1754:(
1735:(
1720:(
1701:(
1681:(
1662:(
1628:(
1546:(
1520:(
1505:(
1490:(
1474:(
1436:(
1384:(
1278:(
1263:(
1234:(
1217:(
1200:(
1180:(
1157:.
1117:.
1097:.
986:.
865:.
744:.
682:.
569:.
549:.
434:.
306::
274:.
204:1
201::
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
71:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.