Knowledge

Talk:Categorical proposition

Source đź“ť

178: 22: 80: 53: 213: 90: 220:
Can somebody give the reason why the names of the categories are AEIO? I mean, the page seems to suggest that AEIO stands for "All", "does not Exist", "Intersect" and "some exist Outside of" Is that even remotely correct? If arbitrary labels are given, then what is the point in learning AEIO? Why not
297:
To comment on the O form, saying Some S is not P or Not every S is P, one could see that Not every S is P is the same as Not all..., which is the same as Some (an undefined number, 1 or more, but less then all). Therefore, Not every... is the same as Some is... not. Could one with "Peter Geach and
330:
book Logic) implication. As in, which categorical forms imply each other. For example, in 1st figure arguments, A(S,P) implies I(S,P). Now for 2nd figure arguments, E(S,P) implies E(P,S). I have a comprehensive list of these in table-form. All this information can be backed with Mr. Clark's Logic
111:
on Knowledge. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the
409: 138: 148: 404: 419: 113: 414: 259:
The Distribution section in this article better explains the concept. Maybe we can put the table in the other article in this article.
424: 365:) so that "is" is used instead of "are", e.g., "All S is P" instead of "All S are P". Why? This seems grammatically incorrect to me. 103: 58: 298:
others" works explain how changing the English in the form change the meaning? This seems more like made-up equivocation.
33: 185: 63: 226: 21: 222: 370: 279: 264: 253: 241: 39: 385: 381: 340: 307: 275: 260: 356: 95: 366: 237: 177: 398: 335: 302: 389: 374: 344: 327: 311: 283: 268: 245: 230: 108: 85: 107:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to 326:
If others think it necessary, I could explain (Using information from
79: 52: 380:
Agreed. I don't see a basis for restriction to the singular.
15: 176: 236:
The article now includes this information with a source.
359:
back in 2017 changed most of the article (starting with
361: 159: 221:ABCD? Please do give labels that are explained. 8: 19: 156: 47: 49: 117:about philosophy content on Knowledge. 7: 101:This article is within the scope of 410:High-importance Philosophy articles 38:It is of interest to the following 14: 211: 123:Knowledge:WikiProject Philosophy 88: 78: 51: 20: 405:Start-Class Philosophy articles 143:This article has been rated as 126:Template:WikiProject Philosophy 420:High-importance logic articles 375:13:15, 20 September 2019 (UTC) 1: 284:19:08, 28 November 2011 (UTC) 269:03:19, 25 November 2011 (UTC) 246:00:18, 10 February 2013 (UTC) 441: 415:Start-Class logic articles 345:03:29, 21 March 2013 (UTC) 312:03:20, 21 March 2013 (UTC) 231:17:15, 30 March 2010 (UTC) 209: 149:project's importance scale 425:Logic task force articles 390:15:38, 25 June 2022 (UTC) 184: 155: 142: 73: 46: 206:Meaningful Labels Please 160:Associated task forces: 181: 104:WikiProject Philosophy 28:This article is rated 254:Distribution of terms 180: 129:Philosophy articles 182: 114:general discussion 34:content assessment 328:Gordon H. Clark's 203: 202: 199: 198: 195: 194: 191: 190: 96:Philosophy portal 432: 364: 347: 314: 215: 214: 167: 157: 131: 130: 127: 124: 121: 98: 93: 92: 91: 82: 75: 74: 69: 66: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 440: 439: 435: 434: 433: 431: 430: 429: 395: 394: 360: 354: 338: 324: 305: 295: 274:I merged them. 257: 218: 217: 212: 208: 165: 145:High-importance 128: 125: 122: 119: 118: 94: 89: 87: 68:High‑importance 67: 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 438: 436: 428: 427: 422: 417: 412: 407: 397: 396: 393: 392: 353: 350: 349: 348: 343:comment added 336:Steven Perszyk 323: 320: 318: 316: 315: 310:comment added 303:Steven Perszyk 294: 291: 289: 287: 286: 256: 250: 249: 248: 223:Burning.flamer 210: 207: 204: 201: 200: 197: 196: 193: 192: 189: 188: 183: 173: 172: 170: 168: 162: 161: 153: 152: 141: 135: 134: 132: 100: 99: 83: 71: 70: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 437: 426: 423: 421: 418: 416: 413: 411: 408: 406: 403: 402: 400: 391: 387: 383: 379: 378: 377: 376: 372: 368: 363: 358: 352:"is" vs "are" 351: 346: 342: 337: 334: 333: 332: 329: 321: 319: 313: 309: 304: 301: 300: 299: 293:I and O Forms 292: 290: 285: 281: 277: 273: 272: 271: 270: 266: 262: 255: 251: 247: 243: 239: 235: 234: 233: 232: 228: 224: 205: 187: 179: 175: 174: 171: 169: 164: 163: 158: 154: 150: 146: 140: 137: 136: 133: 116: 115: 110: 106: 105: 97: 86: 84: 81: 77: 76: 72: 65: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 357:User:Crito10 355: 325: 317: 296: 288: 258: 219: 144: 112: 102: 40:WikiProjects 367:Jason Quinn 362:this change 339:—Preceding 322:Implication 306:—Preceding 252:Merge from 238:Jason Quinn 30:Start-class 399:Categories 382:Antillarum 120:Philosophy 109:philosophy 59:Philosophy 276:Yeom0609 261:Yeom0609 216:Resolved 341:undated 308:undated 147:on the 36:scale. 331:book 186:Logic 64:Logic 386:talk 371:talk 280:talk 265:talk 242:talk 227:talk 139:High 401:: 388:) 373:) 282:) 267:) 244:) 229:) 166:/ 62:: 384:( 369:( 278:( 263:( 240:( 225:( 151:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Philosophy
Logic
WikiProject icon
Philosophy portal
WikiProject Philosophy
philosophy
general discussion
High
project's importance scale
Taskforce icon
Logic
Burning.flamer
talk
17:15, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
Jason Quinn
talk
00:18, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
Distribution of terms
Yeom0609
talk
03:19, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
Yeom0609
talk
19:08, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Steven Perszyk
undated

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑