22:
152:
87:
77:
53:
1021:
in 1985? Because the
Floodgap old archeive 1984 maps shows Long Beach Freeway was still signed as CA-7 at that time. My guess is the renumber process takes gradual step. I thought was like summer 1984 is when they start to replace shields because approval is in June 1, 1984, in March 1985 there might
896:
These infoboxes are nothing compared to the ones I've seen for figure skaters. Some of those go on for well over 1000 pixels. The only thing that should possibly be removed from the routeebox here is the legend, going to a click-link-for-legend arrangement like was formerly used on the infobox for
377:
If the infobox (or any other info) is incorrect, fix it, justify it, and cite your sources. Removing the infobox completely (and moving the article without justification, *and* leaving rude messages as your edit summaries) isn't anything close to resembling "good faith" editing. -
733:
I say keep the current boxes. They're informative and useful. The one you propose SPUI is useless and uninformative. Claims the other ones are "too long" only hold water on CA 1 and CA99. And even then they can be reduced by listing only major interchanges. No need to delete the
303:
I also disagree with both the move and the removal of the infobox. Removal of the infobox is both counterproductive and negates months of hard work by other wikipedians. Also based on SPUI saying, "Fuck you too" when doing this I fail to see any good faith behind this move.
783:
I agree on that point, however I disagree on the solution. The articles should be expanded to be longer then the infobox on most CA routes (mind you I don't think the box is too long except on CA1, CA99 and maybe 101)... which is an ongoing process, give it time. I say
244:
The wording sounds wrong, it still is Route 15, just now a completed
Interstate. It's just former in terms of using the California State Route shield. Remember, California state law makes no distinction between California, U.S., and Interstate Highways.
743:
Completely wrong. The purpose of an infobox is to give some basics about the topic - that's why it gets the upper right position. It should be short so images are not pushed down below. The intersection list can be elsewhere in the article.
660:, I think you are coorect, the info box is too big, but you are going about this all the wrong way. Reinstate it, and do this the democratic way, is there really any point in getting annoyed or annoying others over a bit of HTML? No.
538:
There is still no justification whatsoever for removing the infobox from this article. Claims of redundancy and "it's too big" don't make much sense when this is the only article where those contentions are being made. -
387:
I have improved the article by including more information where it belongs, in the body. This has made the infobox completely redundant, and so I have removed it. You are simply reverting to the incorrect infobox.
356:
I see people are blindly reverting, re-introducing errors such as the incorrect length (there is a milepost equation) and a typo in "Interstate" in the external links. What is wrong with you people? --
1106:
1111:
933:
Your point? There is no rule that states it must be read in under 10 seconds. SPUI you are virtually alone on this one. And your unilateral attitude may work in US politics, but not here.
610:
If you have the correct information, edit the infobox accordingly. You have no justification for removing an item that otherwise appears on every article concerning a CA state route. -
1131:
1136:
408:
If the information in the infobox is incorrect, update it. Removing the infobox entirely (when infoboxes are provided for every other CA SR article) is unjustified. -
1116:
1121:
156:
63:
1126:
670:
I am annoyed over the way my improvements are treated as vandalism. If you want the infobox, include it. Don't remove the corrections and improvements. --
797:
The articles should be expanded, in which case they will include a list of cities and junctions, and that will no longer be necessary in the infobox. --
191:
This is a part of the
California State Highways Knowledge (XXG) Project, and this page needs to be called California State Route 15! DO NOT change it!
121:
1141:
1022:
still be CA-7 signs existing. Beacuse the 1984 still cosider L.B. Freeway as CA-7 I think is 1985 is when whole route renumber to I-710.
550:
117:
100:
58:
649:
1085:
1035:
981:
865:
775:
456:
is not reverted, I will apologize. However, on this article, you have not even used the template - is there a reason for that? --
323:
292:
225:
33:
897:
interstates. Other than that, I like the infobox. It gives me the ten-second summary of the road in one quick glance. —
656:
is in the wrong here. A single user does not get to make a edcision like this in his own, whether he is right or not.
1014:
586:
You don't understand how a postmile equation works. Look at the
Caltrans bridge log and the note in the exit list.
706:
696:
480:
has it shrunk. I'm not going to touch this article yet, even to correct the errors, as that would be a revert. --
477:
39:
21:
229:
450:
500:
And it's been reverted. Thus we have to avoid using the infobox, as its owners don't want it shrunk. --
855:
What is the problem with the routebox? Maybe we need to cut down the one on CA-1 and 99. That's it. --
1082:
1029:
977:
904:
861:
771:
767:
319:
288:
221:
962:
I don't see how common sense and removing the longtime routebox have anything to do with each other.
1010:
116:. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
899:
199:
Um... does this page still need to be a stub? Also does this page need to be merged with I-15?--
92:
282:
I disagree with the move, but if the consensus succeeds at the highways page I'll take it. --
963:
934:
818:
789:
735:
305:
1079:
1077:
Belately, I've decided to redirect this to I-15 CA, as this should really be one route. --
1052:
1023:
973:
857:
611:
578:
540:
438:
409:
379:
315:
284:
217:
200:
185:
1018:
947:
918:
881:
831:
802:
749:
717:
675:
624:
595:
558:
505:
485:
461:
422:
393:
361:
341:
262:
1089:
1072:
1062:
1041:
986:
966:
957:
937:
928:
908:
891:
870:
841:
821:
812:
792:
778:
759:
738:
727:
685:
664:
634:
614:
605:
581:
568:
543:
515:
495:
471:
441:
432:
412:
403:
382:
371:
351:
328:
308:
297:
272:
249:
234:
1100:
1069:
952:
923:
886:
836:
807:
754:
722:
680:
629:
600:
563:
510:
490:
466:
427:
398:
366:
346:
267:
246:
212:
113:
105:
817:
Wrong. What the article needs is expansion of landpark, points of interest, etc...
577:
you arbitrarily decide to remove it from one article. It's there for a reason. -
619:
I have explained my justification. It is you who is not listening to reason. --
661:
82:
255:
943:
914:
877:
827:
798:
745:
713:
671:
657:
653:
620:
591:
554:
501:
481:
457:
418:
389:
357:
337:
258:
76:
52:
652:. Reading the comments on this page, it defineteley looks like user
876:
Infoboxes are not supposed to be huge like this. Period. Eat it. --
109:
766:
It's pretty bad when the infobox is bigger than the article. —
15:
913:
It takes much more than 10 seconds to read the damn thing. --
1068:
When it opened, the controversy behind filling the gap... --
104:, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
120:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
417:
It is totally justified when the infobox is too big. --
1051:
What other history can one provide for this route? —
648:Just a quick note: This article has been listed on
826:Knowledge (XXG) is not paper; we can have both. --
336:Right. Please don't fuck up this article again. --
254:Has I-15 actually been extended? All the signs on
1107:Redirect-Class California road transport articles
942:It works fine when it jives with common sense. --
1112:NA-importance California road transport articles
446:I'll see how long that lasts. If my hackjob on
32:does not require a rating on Knowledge (XXG)'s
588:The mileposts do not match the actual mileage.
549:It's too big on all articles, and thus I have
8:
1132:Redirect-Class U.S. road transport articles
1137:NA-importance U.S. road transport articles
573:Then allow the vote process to take place
47:
98:This redirect is within the scope of the
49:
1117:Redirect-Class Road transport articles
130:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject U.S. Roads
1122:NA-importance Road transport articles
19:
7:
692:In keeping with the recent edits to
240:Legal Definition of former Route 15
38:It is of interest to the following
1127:California road transport articles
14:
953:don't use sorted stub templates!
924:don't use sorted stub templates!
887:don't use sorted stub templates!
837:don't use sorted stub templates!
808:don't use sorted stub templates!
755:don't use sorted stub templates!
723:don't use sorted stub templates!
681:don't use sorted stub templates!
630:don't use sorted stub templates!
601:don't use sorted stub templates!
564:don't use sorted stub templates!
511:don't use sorted stub templates!
491:don't use sorted stub templates!
467:don't use sorted stub templates!
428:don't use sorted stub templates!
399:don't use sorted stub templates!
367:don't use sorted stub templates!
347:don't use sorted stub templates!
268:don't use sorted stub templates!
150:
85:
75:
51:
20:
211:Sould this page be merged into
133:Template:WikiProject U.S. Roads
215:since they are now the same?--
1:
1090:03:50, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
1036:
1030:
1005:About interstates renumbering
352:19:14, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
329:03:34, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
309:06:47, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
1142:U.S. road transport articles
1073:03:19, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
1063:03:15, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
1024:
298:00:02, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
273:03:47, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
250:13:31, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
136:U.S. road transport articles
1042:02:42, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
235:01:12, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
1158:
257:still show it as SR-15. --
203:23:38, May 25, 2005 (UTC)
987:05:47, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
967:05:43, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
958:05:16, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
938:05:14, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
929:04:50, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
909:04:49, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
892:04:24, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
871:03:00, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
842:04:24, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
822:02:09, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
813:00:48, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
793:20:35, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
779:20:13, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
760:19:36, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
739:19:21, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
728:18:39, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
686:18:15, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
665:16:32, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
635:16:16, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
615:15:36, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
606:14:03, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
582:13:09, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
569:13:03, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
544:12:55, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
516:12:28, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
496:08:39, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
478:California State Route 14
472:08:26, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
442:08:21, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
433:08:20, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
413:08:15, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
404:08:12, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
383:08:08, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
372:07:57, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
70:
46:
786:keep the current boxes
551:listed it for deletion
101:U.S. Roads WikiProject
650:Vandalisms in Prgress
1011:Long Beach Freeway
707:Infobox U.S. Route
697:Infobox Interstate
437:Then resize it. -
34:content assessment
955:
926:
889:
839:
810:
757:
725:
683:
632:
603:
566:
513:
493:
469:
430:
401:
369:
349:
313:Yes... agreed. --
270:
181:
180:
177:
176:
173:
172:
93:U.S. roads portal
1149:
1059:
1056:
1038:
1032:
1026:
951:
922:
885:
835:
806:
753:
721:
711:
705:
701:
695:
679:
628:
599:
562:
509:
489:
465:
455:
449:
426:
397:
365:
345:
266:
160:
154:
153:
138:
137:
134:
131:
128:
108:and other major
95:
90:
89:
88:
79:
72:
71:
66:
55:
48:
25:
24:
16:
1157:
1156:
1152:
1151:
1150:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1097:
1096:
1057:
1054:
1049:
1007:
709:
703:
699:
693:
536:
453:
447:
280:
242:
209:
197:
189:
161:
151:
149:
135:
132:
129:
126:
125:
91:
86:
84:
61:
12:
11:
5:
1155:
1153:
1145:
1144:
1139:
1134:
1129:
1124:
1119:
1114:
1109:
1099:
1098:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1048:
1045:
1031:Any questions?
1019:Interstate 710
1013:renumber from
1006:
1003:
1002:
1001:
1000:
999:
998:
997:
996:
995:
994:
993:
992:
991:
990:
989:
853:
852:
851:
850:
849:
848:
847:
846:
845:
844:
764:
763:
762:
691:
689:
688:
646:
645:
644:
643:
642:
641:
640:
639:
638:
637:
535:
532:
531:
530:
529:
528:
527:
526:
525:
524:
523:
522:
521:
520:
519:
518:
498:
334:
333:
332:
331:
279:
276:
241:
238:
208:
205:
196:
195:Classification
193:
188:
182:
179:
178:
175:
174:
171:
170:
168:
166:
163:
162:
148:
146:
142:
141:
139:
106:state highways
97:
96:
80:
68:
67:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1154:
1143:
1140:
1138:
1135:
1133:
1130:
1128:
1125:
1123:
1120:
1118:
1115:
1113:
1110:
1108:
1105:
1104:
1102:
1091:
1088:
1087:
1084:
1081:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1071:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1061:
1060:
1046:
1044:
1043:
1039:
1033:
1027:
1020:
1016:
1012:
1004:
988:
985:
983:
979:
975:
970:
969:
968:
965:
961:
960:
959:
954:
949:
945:
941:
940:
939:
936:
932:
931:
930:
925:
920:
916:
912:
911:
910:
906:
902:
901:
895:
894:
893:
888:
883:
879:
875:
874:
873:
872:
869:
867:
863:
859:
843:
838:
833:
829:
825:
824:
823:
820:
816:
815:
814:
809:
804:
800:
796:
795:
794:
791:
787:
782:
781:
780:
777:
773:
769:
765:
761:
756:
751:
747:
742:
741:
740:
737:
732:
731:
730:
729:
724:
719:
715:
708:
698:
687:
682:
677:
673:
669:
668:
667:
666:
663:
659:
655:
651:
636:
631:
626:
622:
618:
617:
616:
613:
609:
608:
607:
602:
597:
593:
589:
585:
584:
583:
580:
576:
572:
571:
570:
565:
560:
556:
552:
548:
547:
546:
545:
542:
533:
517:
512:
507:
503:
499:
497:
492:
487:
483:
479:
475:
474:
473:
468:
463:
459:
452:
445:
444:
443:
440:
436:
435:
434:
429:
424:
420:
416:
415:
414:
411:
407:
406:
405:
400:
395:
391:
386:
385:
384:
381:
376:
375:
374:
373:
368:
363:
359:
354:
353:
348:
343:
339:
330:
327:
325:
321:
317:
312:
311:
310:
307:
302:
301:
300:
299:
296:
294:
290:
286:
277:
275:
274:
269:
264:
260:
256:
252:
251:
248:
239:
237:
236:
233:
231:
227:
223:
219:
214:
213:Interstate 15
206:
204:
202:
194:
192:
187:
183:
169:
167:
165:
164:
159:
158:
147:
144:
143:
140:
123:
119:
115:
114:United States
111:
107:
103:
102:
94:
83:
81:
78:
74:
73:
69:
65:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
31:
27:
23:
18:
17:
1078:
1053:
1050:
1015:California 7
1008:
972:
898:
856:
854:
785:
690:
647:
587:
574:
537:
355:
335:
314:
283:
281:
253:
243:
216:
210:
198:
190:
155:
118:project page
99:
40:WikiProjects
29:
964:Gateman1997
935:Gateman1997
819:Gateman1997
790:Gateman1997
736:JohnnyBGood
306:Gateman1997
207:Merge then?
1101:Categories
1037:My updates
1025:Freewayguy
974:Rschen7754
971:Agreed. --
858:Rschen7754
768:Locke Cole
612:Chadbryant
579:Chadbryant
541:Chadbryant
451:routeboxca
439:Chadbryant
410:Chadbryant
380:Chadbryant
316:Rschen7754
285:Rschen7754
218:Rschen7754
201:Rschen7754
186:Rschen7754
157:California
127:U.S. Roads
122:discussion
64:California
59:U.S. Roads
734:template.
145:Locations
982:contribs
866:contribs
476:Shrunk.
324:contribs
293:contribs
247:Geopgeop
226:contribs
30:redirect
1047:History
1009:Didn't
534:Infobox
184:From --
112:in the
1055:master
900:C.Fred
575:before
36:scale.
662:Smitz
230:count
110:roads
28:This
1086:7754
1083:chen
978:talk
948:talk
944:SPUI
919:talk
915:SPUI
905:talk
882:talk
878:SPUI
862:talk
832:talk
828:SPUI
803:talk
799:SPUI
750:talk
746:SPUI
718:talk
714:SPUI
712:. --
702:and
676:talk
672:SPUI
658:SPUI
654:SPUI
625:talk
621:SPUI
596:talk
592:SPUI
559:talk
555:SPUI
553:. --
506:talk
502:SPUI
486:talk
482:SPUI
462:talk
458:SPUI
423:talk
419:SPUI
394:talk
390:SPUI
362:talk
358:SPUI
342:talk
338:SPUI
320:talk
289:talk
278:Move
263:talk
259:SPUI
222:talk
1070:NE2
1058:son
1017:to
1103::
1080:Rs
1040:)
1034:-
984:)
980:-
956:)
950:-
927:)
921:-
907:)
890:)
884:-
868:)
864:-
840:)
834:-
811:)
805:-
774:•
770:•
758:)
752:-
744:--
726:)
720:-
710:}}
704:{{
700:}}
694:{{
684:)
678:-
633:)
627:-
604:)
598:-
590:--
567:)
561:-
514:)
508:-
494:)
488:-
470:)
464:-
454:}}
448:{{
431:)
425:-
402:)
396:-
388:--
370:)
364:-
350:)
344:-
326:)
322:-
295:)
291:-
271:)
265:-
245:--
228:-
224:-
62::
1028:(
976:(
946:(
917:(
903:(
880:(
860:(
830:(
801:(
788:.
776:c
772:t
748:(
716:(
674:(
623:(
594:(
557:(
504:(
484:(
460:(
421:(
392:(
360:(
340:(
318:(
287:(
261:(
232:)
220:(
124:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
