Knowledge

Talk:Carathéodory conjecture

Source 📝

84: 74: 53: 22: 164:
Answer: This paper does indeed contain a complete proof of the conjecture. It has gone through a second version, filling in more details, sharpening the arguments etc and will appear in print in the near future (second version available at
169:). The paper is not being mentioned now on the wiki page because it has been aggressively edited out (see edits by mghomi) purportedly because it has not yet completed the peer-review process. 140: 219: 285: 281: 267: 352: 130: 347: 106: 220:
https://web.archive.org/web/20150605145601/http://www.ams.org/journals/proc/2012-140-12/S0002-9939-2012-11420-0/S0002-9939-2012-11420-0.pdf
97: 58: 223: 181: 328: 33: 203: 284:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
172:
It is interesting to note that "announced" proofs of the Lawson and Willmore conjectures appear on wikipedia (
21: 319: 211: 303:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
291: 39: 210:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 83: 258: 185: 105:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
231: 89: 288:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
224:
http://www.ams.org/journals/proc/2012-140-12/S0002-9939-2012-11420-0/S0002-9939-2012-11420-0.pdf
73: 52: 304: 173: 311: 158: 333: 189: 270:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 310:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
341: 277: 102: 276:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 79: 157:
I don't know a huge amount about this subject but was told that this paper
177: 166: 161:
was apparently a proof of the conjecture. Anyone know anything more?
15: 243:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
237: 174:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Hsiang%E2%80%93Lawson%27s_conjecture
214:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
159:
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0808/0808.0851v1.pdf
207: 101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 280:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 180:respectively) despite being in similar positions. 266:This message was posted before February 2018. 8: 178:http://en.wikipedia.org/Willmore_conjecture 19: 202:I have just modified one external link on 47: 49: 255:to let others know (documentation at 7: 167:http://arxiv.org/pdf/0808.0851v2.pdf 95:This article is within the scope of 38:It is of interest to the following 14: 353:Low-priority mathematics articles 206:. Please take a moment to review 115:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics 348:Start-Class mathematics articles 118:Template:WikiProject Mathematics 82: 72: 51: 20: 135:This article has been rated as 1: 334:23:33, 14 November 2016 (UTC) 109:and see a list of open tasks. 369: 297:(last update: 5 June 2024) 199:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 190:12:07, 22 March 2013 (UTC) 238:http://www.w-volk.de/BMG/ 134: 67: 46: 141:project's priority scale 204:Carathéodory conjecture 195:External links modified 98:WikiProject Mathematics 28:This article is rated 278:regular verification 121:mathematics articles 268:After February 2018 247:parameter below to 322:InternetArchiveBot 273:InternetArchiveBot 90:Mathematics portal 34:content assessment 298: 155: 154: 151: 150: 147: 146: 360: 332: 323: 296: 295: 274: 262: 235: 123: 122: 119: 116: 113: 92: 87: 86: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 368: 367: 363: 362: 361: 359: 358: 357: 338: 337: 326: 321: 289: 282:have permission 272: 256: 229: 212:this simple FaQ 197: 120: 117: 114: 111: 110: 88: 81: 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 366: 364: 356: 355: 350: 340: 339: 316: 315: 308: 241: 240: 226: 218:Added archive 196: 193: 153: 152: 149: 148: 145: 144: 133: 127: 126: 124: 107:the discussion 94: 93: 77: 65: 64: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 365: 354: 351: 349: 346: 345: 343: 336: 335: 330: 325: 324: 313: 309: 306: 302: 301: 300: 293: 287: 283: 279: 275: 269: 264: 260: 254: 250: 246: 239: 233: 227: 225: 221: 217: 216: 215: 213: 209: 205: 200: 194: 192: 191: 187: 183: 179: 175: 170: 168: 162: 160: 142: 138: 132: 129: 128: 125: 108: 104: 100: 99: 91: 85: 80: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 320: 317: 292:source check 271: 265: 252: 248: 244: 242: 201: 198: 171: 163: 156: 137:Low-priority 136: 96: 62:Low‑priority 40:WikiProjects 259:Sourcecheck 112:Mathematics 103:mathematics 59:Mathematics 30:Start-class 342:Categories 329:Report bug 182:46.18.9.33 312:this tool 305:this tool 232:dead link 318:Cheers.— 245:checked 236:tag to 208:my edit 139:on the 253:failed 228:Added 36:scale. 249:true 186:talk 176:and 286:RfC 263:). 251:or 222:to 131:Low 344:: 299:. 294:}} 290:{{ 261:}} 257:{{ 234:}} 230:{{ 188:) 331:) 327:( 314:. 307:. 184:( 143:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Mathematics
WikiProject icon
icon
Mathematics portal
WikiProject Mathematics
mathematics
the discussion
Low
project's priority scale
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0808/0808.0851v1.pdf
http://arxiv.org/pdf/0808.0851v2.pdf
http://en.wikipedia.org/Hsiang%E2%80%93Lawson%27s_conjecture
http://en.wikipedia.org/Willmore_conjecture
46.18.9.33
talk
12:07, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
Carathéodory conjecture
my edit
this simple FaQ
https://web.archive.org/web/20150605145601/http://www.ams.org/journals/proc/2012-140-12/S0002-9939-2012-11420-0/S0002-9939-2012-11420-0.pdf
http://www.ams.org/journals/proc/2012-140-12/S0002-9939-2012-11420-0/S0002-9939-2012-11420-0.pdf
dead link
http://www.w-volk.de/BMG/
Sourcecheck
After February 2018
regular verification

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.