Knowledge

Talk:Cartan's criterion

Source 📝

84: 74: 53: 22: 157:
I deleted the claim that nilpotency is equivalent to vanishing of the Killing form as it is false. There are non-nilpotent Lie algebras whose Killing form vanishes. Hopefully it won't violate the no original research principle if I give a counterexample further down. I haven't found any reference
176:
Counterexample: let L be a complex vector space with a basis {a,b,c}. There is a unique alternating bilinear form such that = b, = i.c , = 0. The only non-trivial case of the Jacobi identity is ] + ] + ] = 0, which holds because each term vanishes individually. Hence we have a Lie algebra.
180:
For any x, y, is a linear combination of b, c, so ] = ] = 0. Hence (ad b)(ad x) = (ad c)(ad x) = 0, so the Killing form * satisfies b*x = c*x = 0. Finally, a*a = tr((ad a)^2)) - tr((diag(0,1,i))^2) = tr(diag(0,1,-1) = 0. Thus * vanishes.
353: 296: 531: 140: 460: 484: 234: 173:, which correctly states that nilpotency implies that the Killing form vanishes (it is the converse that is false) but does not refer to this fact as Cartan's criterion. 169:
only refers to the solvable case as "Cartan's criterion" (p.66), though it discusses the semisimple case too (p.68). The only reference to nilpotency I could find is
567: 130: 562: 547: 106: 97: 58: 301: 161:
Also, it seems that the standard usage of "Cartan's criterion" refers only to either the solvable or the semisimple case. Eg.
240:
Not sure why this claim is made in this article anyways, besides the fact that it is false: take e.g. the associative algebra
243: 33: 489: 21: 196: 543: 39: 83: 358: 162: 539: 465: 215: 186:
so the common kernel of the adjoint action is trivial). Alternatively, observe that = <b,c: -->
105:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
89: 486:
in fact has a non-degenerate bilinear form but is not reductive... it has a single proper ideal
73: 52: 192: 166: 556: 184:
Finally, L is not nilpotent because it has no center (since ker(ad a) = <a: -->
102: 200: 165:
explicitly discusses both cases under the heading of "Cartan's criterion", and
236:
is reductive if and only if it admits a nondegenerate invariant bilinear form.
79: 170: 533:
which is abelian, so the adjoint representation is not reducible.
15: 348:{\displaystyle {\mathfrak {g}}=sl_{2}(\mathbb {C} )\otimes A} 188:, so the upper central series stabilises at <b,c: --> 492: 468: 361: 304: 246: 218: 291:{\displaystyle A=\mathbb {C} /\langle z^{2}\rangle } 101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 525: 478: 454: 347: 290: 228: 212:More generally, a finite-dimensional Lie algebra 536:See also e.g. Favre & Santharoubane (1987). 206:Non-degenerate invariant bilinear form =/=: --> 526:{\displaystyle sl_{2}(\mathbb {C} )\otimes z} 158:to the fact that this equivalence is false. 8: 285: 272: 19: 47: 510: 509: 500: 491: 470: 469: 467: 360: 332: 331: 322: 306: 305: 303: 279: 267: 254: 253: 245: 220: 219: 217: 185:, ker(ad b) = ker(ad c) = <b,c: --> 49: 7: 95:This article is within the scope of 471: 307: 221: 38:It is of interest to the following 14: 568:Mid-priority mathematics articles 455:{\displaystyle =\otimes f(z)g(z)} 115:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics 563:Start-Class mathematics articles 118:Template:WikiProject Mathematics 82: 72: 51: 20: 479:{\displaystyle {\mathfrak {g}}} 229:{\displaystyle {\mathfrak {g}}} 135:This article has been rated as 514: 506: 449: 443: 437: 431: 422: 410: 404: 401: 395: 380: 374: 362: 336: 328: 264: 258: 1: 549:00:19, 14 December 2010 (UTC) 298:and consider the Lie algebra 109:and see a list of open tasks. 584: 201:22:01, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 134: 67: 46: 141:project's priority scale 355:(usual definition with 98:WikiProject Mathematics 527: 480: 456: 349: 292: 230: 28:This article is rated 528: 481: 457: 350: 293: 231: 490: 466: 359: 302: 244: 216: 121:mathematics articles 187:and = <b,c: --> 523: 476: 452: 345: 288: 226: 90:Mathematics portal 34:content assessment 155: 154: 151: 150: 147: 146: 575: 548:_reductive": --> 532: 530: 529: 524: 513: 505: 504: 485: 483: 482: 477: 475: 474: 461: 459: 458: 453: 354: 352: 351: 346: 335: 327: 326: 311: 310: 297: 295: 294: 289: 284: 283: 271: 257: 235: 233: 232: 227: 225: 224: 123: 122: 119: 116: 113: 92: 87: 86: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 583: 582: 578: 577: 576: 574: 573: 572: 553: 552: 496: 488: 487: 464: 463: 357: 356: 318: 300: 299: 275: 242: 241: 214: 213: 209: 120: 117: 114: 111: 110: 88: 81: 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 581: 579: 571: 570: 565: 555: 554: 522: 519: 516: 512: 508: 503: 499: 495: 473: 451: 448: 445: 442: 439: 436: 433: 430: 427: 424: 421: 418: 415: 412: 409: 406: 403: 400: 397: 394: 391: 388: 385: 382: 379: 376: 373: 370: 367: 364: 344: 341: 338: 334: 330: 325: 321: 317: 314: 309: 287: 282: 278: 274: 270: 266: 263: 260: 256: 252: 249: 223: 208: 204: 153: 152: 149: 148: 145: 144: 133: 127: 126: 124: 107:the discussion 94: 93: 77: 65: 64: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 580: 569: 566: 564: 561: 560: 558: 551: 550: 545: 541: 537: 534: 520: 517: 501: 497: 493: 446: 440: 434: 428: 425: 419: 416: 413: 407: 398: 392: 389: 386: 383: 377: 371: 368: 365: 342: 339: 323: 319: 315: 312: 280: 276: 268: 261: 250: 247: 238: 237: 205: 203: 202: 198: 194: 190: 182: 178: 174: 172: 168: 164: 159: 142: 138: 132: 129: 128: 125: 108: 104: 100: 99: 91: 85: 80: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 538: 535: 239: 211: 210: 193:Jeremy Henty 191: 183: 179: 175: 160: 156: 137:Mid-priority 136: 96: 62:Mid‑priority 40:WikiProjects 112:Mathematics 103:mathematics 59:Mathematics 30:Start-class 557:Categories 540:Adagioing 462:). Then 207:reductive 139:on the 36:scale. 544:talk 197:talk 171:here 167:this 163:this 131:Mid 559:: 546:) 518:⊗ 426:⊗ 390:⊗ 369:⊗ 340:⊗ 286:⟩ 273:⟨ 199:) 189:. 542:( 521:z 515:) 511:C 507:( 502:2 498:l 494:s 472:g 450:) 447:z 444:( 441:g 438:) 435:z 432:( 429:f 423:] 420:y 417:, 414:x 411:[ 408:= 405:] 402:) 399:z 396:( 393:g 387:y 384:, 381:) 378:z 375:( 372:f 366:x 363:[ 343:A 337:) 333:C 329:( 324:2 320:l 316:s 313:= 308:g 281:2 277:z 269:/ 265:] 262:z 259:[ 255:C 251:= 248:A 222:g 195:( 143:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Mathematics
WikiProject icon
icon
Mathematics portal
WikiProject Mathematics
mathematics
the discussion
Mid
project's priority scale
this
this
here
Jeremy Henty
talk
22:01, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
Adagioing
talk
00:19, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Categories
Start-Class mathematics articles
Mid-priority mathematics articles

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.