Talk:Central Provident Fund

1138:

Faso", right? We are not surprised or affronted if someone calls a new but similar entity, somewhere other than Singapore, a "central provident fund". They have done so, more than once. We would be surprised and affronted if someone called a new country "Australia". Same with "queen". That starts as a generic term, like "peripheral nervous system". "The queen" has greater specificity: it refers in a contextually determined way to a particular person. Capitalising to "the Queen" lends even more specificity, tending to fix the reference more durably but still according to context. The fact that people in Britain refer rather consistently to one particular person when they say "the Queen" does not render the expression incapable of referring differently. Now, suppose that all the queens in the world abdicated, except for their Queen Elizabeth. "The queen", and "queen" by itself, would still be general terms that anyone can use generally

679:, with three times the population of Singapore? Knowledge should play no part in shoring up linguistic, economic, or geopolitical hegemonies in the economy of ideas. If some pension fund in Singapore appropriates a certain name, that is well and good: and such a name serves them well. But on Knowledge, nothing is lost by retaining the qualification "(Singapore)". It has been alleged above that such qualifications might mislead readers; I say they can only inform. AjaxSmack has made three assertions here: "To the non-initiated, it implies the existence of other Central Provident Funds. To the user versed in the ways of Knowledge, it directly states that there is another article at Knowledge dealing with another important Central Provident Fund. Neither is true." I see no evidence for the first and second assertions, which make a spurious distinction between insiders and outsiders. If I am either, I am an insider: but 928:. The fact of the matter is that we don't preemptively disambiguate. Dick has created a South African article (currently up for A7 speedy deletion, I see), but even if it survives, it is still obvious that Singapore Central Provident Fund is the primary topic. To Tony and Noetica, I can see where you're coming from, but you are going against a common practice that is site-wide. My suggestion would be that if you truly want to alter the practice of only using parens for disambiguation, then it would be better to go top-down (i.e. getting community consensus via RfC of somesuch), rather than constantly fighting uphill battles on obscure articles. 2072:

CPF.. Singapore’s Ministry of Finance on its part has put forth its explanation as to why CPF funds are invested in Special Singapore Government Securities, to enable CPF Board to be able to pay its members all their monies when due, and the interest that it commits to pay on CPF accounts. The government securities are invested as part of a combined pool of funds managed by GIC, rather than managed in a separate dedicated fund, as a standalone fund would have to be managed conservatively to avoid the risk of failing to meet obligations to CPF members.

490:, I would rather have a discussion about it. Tony's contention is that using what could be a generic term to refer exclusively to a specific instance of that term is misleading, and that such uses ought to include parenthetical qualification (Tony, correct me if I got that wrong). However, I contend that our usual practice is to only provide disambiguation where necessary, and that in this case there are no other "central provident funds" with articles, and so no disambiguation is needed. 74: 53: 317: 84: 22: 162: 861:. There is no other article with the title and nothing to disambiguate within the context of Knowledge. When there is another article (or even a redirect to a section of another article with content relevant to the title), then and only then will it be necessary to use a parenthetical disambiguator. For the concern that other stuff might exist, 2101:

misappropriation". An injunction against Ngerng was granted, barring him from publishing future similar accusations regarding PM Lee and the CPF. Ngerng expressed disappointment at the verdict, but maintained that he would "still continue to speak up on the CPF and other issues that concern Singaporeans".

420:

CPF is a compulsary savings plan at individual level, whereby each one funds its own benefits, even though it is controlled by a State organization : therefore it is a "private" security savings plan : you will get exactly what you save, and nobody else (except family) will benefit from this savings.

209:

The section on disputes added by Yosri was incomprehensible, until I read the reference provided. The reference is dedicated to bias opinion for workers' rights. Yosri, in this case, use a paragraph of the page for the disputes section in a bias way. If you would like to add anything, even if there's

1504:

of my FAQ. So, we should be deciding whether WP would be improved by this move or not, including possibly accepting that it would contradict what policy/guidelines say (at least for now), to see whether or not there is at least consensus support for this idea among a small group of us as applied to

1497:

As far as I know, the argument in opposition to this move presented and advocated by Tony, Noetica and Dick is novel. I agree with most of what Jenks24 says above, except the suggestion that such novel arguments need to be made top-down, and, until and unless they achieve consensus at the top, they

1264:

is linked in a hatnote, and as I mentioned earlier, if it satisfies notability criteria and is not deleted, then there is perhaps something to disambiguate. The previous comment was in response to a hypothetical proposition that an article on the concept of provident funds might be written. Oh wait,

229:

I re-did the entire page taking out the redundant criticisms and whatever stuff about people wanting CPF to move here and there. So putting this article against others, I rate it as Start class. Please tell me if you beg to differ. Also, I will be adding much more stuff later on during the day as of

2082:

Ngerng said that the article was a call for greater transparency on the CPF, the GIC and Temasek Holdings. and called for PM Lee to rebut the points made in his blog post.. Singapore’s Ministry of Finance has publicly stated that CPF monies are safe as all CPF monies are invested in securities that

1795:

The article is void/silent of any discussion of social policy issues that need further attention (e.g. concerning rates of return provided that have and keep being very low, the (low) accumulation level by income level, benefits level in comparison to labor market income (for pensions) and to other

1137:

I am surprised that you don't understand. The structure of "central provident fund" shows that it has analysable semantic content comparable to that of, say, "peripheral nervous system". We don't need a reference to show that! It's more like "peripheral nervous system" than "Australia", or "Burkina

808:

clearly states: "However, sometimes a requested move is filed in response to a recent move from a long existing name that cannot be undone without administrative help. Therefore, if the closer feels that no consensus has been reached, they may move the article back to the most recent stable name."

608:

There is a clear affirmative reason not to preemptively disambiguate as well. Although there may not be any great harm in having a parenthetical following a title in any individual case, it runs counter to the general prescription that conciseness of titles is important. This is long-established

541:" is the one that is misleading. To the non-initiated, it implies the existence of other Central Provident Funds. To the user versed in the ways of Knowledge, it directly states that there is another article at Knowledge dealing with another important Central Provident Fund. Neither is true. — 2071:

The CPF has been described as "a forced savings scheme" for Singaporeans with "monthly contributions into the fund" to be saved for retirement, or for expenses on "property, healthcare, and their children's education", while the GIC has been described to have "indirectly invested" funds from the

1507:

With all that in mind, I simply see nothing persuasive about the argument to keep this article at the unnecessarily disambiguated name. I think the concepts of primary topic and avoiding over-precision are good ones. As has been noted, even any other Central Provident Fund is clearly much less

1791:

It is a good descriptive article that sets out the basic mechanism of the SQ PF. It covers well contributions, eligibility criteria and benefit types (and what is presented is in line with my recollection). What would be useful to add are a few small tables/graphs with annual data on scope of

1413:

The fact that the current discussion is over a Singaporean agency should be evidence enough that this is not a U.S.-versus-everyone-else issue. Please try to stop making it one. Are there any other National Park Services that we have articles for? No. So if the American one is the only one

2112:

proposed to pay the S$ 150,000 in instalments which was granted by the Prime Minister on the condition that Ngerng paid the S$ 30,000 in hearing costs immediately i.e. by 16 March 2016. Ngerng is expected to repay $ 100 a month from 1 April 2016 onwards over five years until 1 April 2021 when

362:

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as

2067:

leaders, who were being charged with misappropriating funds.. Roy Ngerng’s contract was terminated by his employer, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, in June 2014 because of "conduct incompatible with the values and standards expected of employees, and for misusing working time, hospital computers and

424:

This is particularly true under a western European understanding : poorer population fund little or nothing, but will benefit the most from the social security; wealthier population will fund much more, yet will benefit little or nothing from the Scheme (true in France for government medical

836:

That's good. I hope the consensus is clear enough for that fact not to matter, but you're all good. I mean, a consensus for the long-standing title is great, and a strong enough consensus against one means that we abandon the long-standing title, per consensus. We'll see what happens. :)

416:

My understanding of "social" security means fundings are centralized by a State or local administration controlled body, which controls distribution of the benefits to a population according to specific rules : you don't get what you save, you get what you are entitled to by such rules.

2100:

found Ngerng liable of defamation with damages to be assessed, which was the first such ruling in Singapore over a purely online article. Judge Lee Seiu Kin ruled that there was "no triable defence" and "no doubt that it is defamatory to suggest that the plaintiff is guilty of criminal

2479:

The broader issue is still about CPF. Defamation suit is just a side show; a distraction. He lost it because he admitted to the defamation instead of fighting his cause. Maybe this section should be revised to refocus on CPF issues he raised instead of the defamation part.

1096:

a primary topic associated with the expression "central provident fund". For that, usage and familiarity are not sufficient; and indeed, the expression has the form of a generic expression like "the queen" (which we do not take as having a primary topic – certainly not any

1498:

should be dismissed simply for not having support of broad community consensus. That would create a Catch-22 situation, making change contrary to policy and guidelines at the article level, and to policy and guidelines in general, practically impossible, as explained at

650:

I think Tony was perfectly justified in his move. The avoidance of parenthetic qualifiers has gone too far, and needs system-wide review. So what if Singapore's central provident fund is the most widely known? Other places want to continue to use this descriptive term in

2011:

Hello all, the following is an exact "massive" copy of what appears on Roy Ngerng's page itself. It is totally inappropriate. Nothing to do with CPF policies, but about his libel case in which he was found guilty. It's like a promotional piece for his cause.

1520:

names should even be considered for primary topic treatment (no parenthetic disambiguation). Well, that, frankly, is a radical idea in the realm of WP article titles, and one for which I believe the reasons to oppose far outweigh the reasons to support.

1511:

I would like to say that the idea that "Central Provident Fund" cannot be a primary topic for anything because "there exists a primary topic associated with the expression 'central provident fund'" is particularly far-fetched. I'm glad that the example of

1351:. I'm persuaded that Singapore's CPF is the primary one, at least in the wikiworld. That no other article existed with that title until last week is good evidence of that. And I have to say that I don't understand the argument that because the title 909:(after ec) That's a start. We'll see if it has sufficient notability to sustain a standalone article. I'm not aware of many articles about specific individual investment funds, especially where there is little or no third party coverage of the fund. 593:

Second, a user might access the article through Knowledge's search function or an external search engine such as Google. In this case, a vast majority of searchers will be looking for the Singapore fund because it is the primary topic (see

602:

be other Central Provident Funds out there but, since there is no article on them at Knowledge, the small minority of users naturally could not find any information about them here anyway. Therefore, a parenthetical disambiguator is not

1273:(as this page was then named) I don't see any problem with including them there. In fact, If the SA fund article survives, there might be a basis for redirecting "Central Provident Fund" to the "Provident Fund" disambiguation page. 2508:

Roy drew some parallel regarding the round-triping of church funds and how the CPF operate. That point which generate controversy got loss in the woods because of the lawsuit. Should be able to dig out some reliable references.

570:

There are two negative reasons why parentheticals are not needed if there is no ambiguity based on how users access the topic and what information they might be seeking. There are several ways a user might arrive at this

671:. Of course we can agree with AjaxSmack, above: the fact that this article is about "little" Singapore and not the US or Britain, say, is not itself a warrant for parenthetic qualification. But then, what about "little" 588:

The context of Singapore is perfectly clear from the sentence. Parenthetical identifiers do nothing in such cases because they don't appear in running text, anyway. Therefore, a parenthetical is not needed.

507:

there are no other funds of this name? Have you checked? It's so generic in its scope that one could easily be created tomorrow, and without knowing it, the article name becomes POV. Why mislead the readers?

668: 827:

I'm not asking for a procedural close; I'm reminding the closer -- since it wasn't clear in my original nomination -- that the longstanding title of this article was different than the current title.

818:

It's better to let the discussion run its course and let us determine with great clarity where consensus lies, than to ask for a procedural close and leave the truth of consensus feeling in doubt. -

140: 1468:

as a redirect to it? If so, I applaud your consistency and thank you in advance for clarifying. If not, please explain why the argument you're presenting here would not apply to the case of

692:

It's high time we met the real needs of real users, instead of narrowly appealing to favourite practices here – or to guidelines that were never intended to mask the true topic of an article.

664: 1359:

generic, that we need to disambiguate. We have innumerable nondisambiguated articles at titles that could be generic. There are at least a dozen royal navies; but we have an article on the

626:

Editorially, I would add that simply supposing that Singapore is too small or far from the great English-speaking centers of the world to warrant a non-parenthetical title is to perpetuate

2079:, who stated that the blog post alleged that Lee "is guilty of criminal misappropriation of the monies paid by Singaporeans to the CPF" and that the allegations were "false and baseless". 359:

is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

736:

there aren't other ones", and why put a rod down our backs by creating admin work when another pops up? This is apart from the other issues at stake. A quick google search found one in

660: 656: 1792:

participants (contributor, affiliated, beneficiaries), contribution rates (employer, employee), the interest rate provided, and total revenues, expenditure and accumulations.

2113:

instalments are increased to S$ 1,000 until the full sum has been paid by the year 2033. Lee also rejected Ngerng's request to reimburse part of the damages i.e. S$ 36,000.

1516:

was raised, and it was confirmed that per their argument it's problematic too. What this argument amounts to at its essence is that only entities with names that are

1122:

I don't understand your point or your queen analogy. Are you saying that CPF has a generic meaning? If so, what is it? Is there any reference that support this? —

1269:

dab page. I think it's fine to add links there, though some might challenge entries as partial title matches. But seeing as that page started out as a redirect to

1953: 1949: 1935: 1722: 1718: 1704: 1075:, then that term should be the title of the article on that topic (or should redirect to an article on that topic that uses a different, more appropriate title). 805: 2437: 737: 988:"There is no single criterion for defining a primary topic. However, there are two major aspects that are commonly discussed in connection with primary topics: 1817:: Holzmann, Robert, 2015. "Old-Age Financial Protection in Malaysia: Challenges and Options," IZA Policy Papers 96, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA). 2323: 2542: 1590: 130: 2159: 340:, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with 1367:. Using an example with even more generic words, we could describe the concept of a Federal information processing standard; but we have an article on 1600: 394:

Kervlar, I think you should write to CPF regarding this and ask them to post information about this or you can contribute by finding out as well. ^^

1620: 1580: 2547: 2537: 2093:, Ngerng argued that his blog post had been misunderstood, and that he was merely asking for more transparency and accountability for CPF monies. 1368: 337: 1317:

I admit it was a bit of an exaggeration, but the arguments for and against such a move closely parallel the ones for and against this proposal.

1871: 364: 356: 352: 333: 2108:

handed down a judgement ordering Ngerng to pay S$ 100,000 in general damages and S$ 50,000 in aggravated damages. Ngerng, through his lawyer,

1610: 2172: 1630: 1261: 883: 687:

central provident fund. The third assertion ("neither is true") is false, as my examples of other such funds, real or projected, demonstrate.

1670: 106: 1881: 1660: 2083:

are issued and guaranteed by the Singapore Government, which is one of the few remaining triple-A credit-rated governments in the world.

1921: 1650: 1640: 368: 254: 1911: 2208: 538: 479: 2458: 1901: 1891: 1092:

Your conclusion that the topic of the present article is a primary topic not well supported; you would need to show first that there

1931:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

1228: 862: 2494:

I don't support a blanket removal of the content as the IP is doing. I do support editing it so that it fits the article better.--

621:

This sensibly prevents mass proliferation of superfluous descriptions that should be in the intro paragraph rather than the title.

268:

The current rates are clearly stated in the (very short) lede para of the article - right at the top/beginning of the article....

2261: 2048: 1804:

We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.

97: 58: 2383: 2234: 1050:

of that is out of context, Ajax. Here is the context set by what precedes your excerpt of the guideline (with my underlining):

2408: 713:, having read the arguments above. Without the parenthetical, the title gives little clue about the topic of the article. 1009:

if it is has significantly greater enduring notability and educational value than any other topic associated with that term

582:"Howe became best remembered by Singaporeans for his controversial proposal in 1984 to raise the age for the withdrawal of 2086:

Ngerng apologized "unreservedly" on 23 May, admitting that his allegation was "false and completely without foundation".

1996: 1807:

We believe Dr. Holzmann has expertise on the topic of this article, since he has published relevant scholarly research:

1765: 33: 2351: 1549:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

454:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

2413: 2300: 2040: 1591:

https://web.archive.org/web/20130504120241/http://www.mom.gov.sg:80/newsroom/Pages/PressReleasesDetail.aspx?listid=408

1461: 2160:

https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/blogger-roy-ngerngs-employment-contract-with-tan-tock-seng-hospital-terminated

1160:

be a lexeme. I could take your word for it that they are but it would be nice to have outside input or evidence. "

1601:

https://web.archive.org/web/20140714225805/http://www.mom.gov.sg/newsroom/Pages/PressReleasesDetail.aspx?listid=499

675:? A sub-provincial city with twice the population of Singapore, and a GDP of $ US146 billion. What about "little" 1291: 1161: 1952:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

1721:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

1621:

https://web.archive.org/web/20120417231219/http://mycpf.cpf.gov.sg:80/Employers/Gen-Info/cpf-Contri/ContriRa.htm

1581:

https://web.archive.org/web/20151005235513/https://mycpf.cpf.gov.sg/Members/AboutUs/about-us-info/history-of-cpf

1187:

discusses a National Provident Fund (a title translated from a similar French term), and WP has a disambig page

1825: 1191:; some are employee's, some central, some national, etc. I can see how one might be confused if not aware the 565:. Parentheticals in titles at Knowledge are used for titles that are ambiguous and there is no ambiguity here. 21: 2059:(GIC). Ngerng claimed there was an "uncanny resemblance" between this chart and another chart by news agency 1872:

https://web.archive.org/web/20120417231219/http://mycpf.cpf.gov.sg/Employers/Gen-Info/cpf-Contri/ContriRa.htm

258: 2295: 2097: 1987: 1851: 1829: 1756: 1572: 1442:

as another example of an article at a potentially generic title. I don't believe the U.S. has one of those.

1859: 1611:

https://web.archive.org/web/20130315114343/http://mycpf.cpf.gov.sg:80/CPF/News/News-Release/N_13Dec2012.htm

1604: 1594: 1843: 1631:

https://web.archive.org/web/20140616094841/http://mycpf.cpf.gov.sg:80/CPF/News/News-Release/N_8May2014.htm

1564: 1372: 1270: 975: 680: 595: 583: 483: 302: 187: 2135: 1294:

must be disambiguated because there might be other national parks with yellow stones in them somewhere.

2514: 2499: 2485: 1971:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

1959: 1740:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

1728: 1671:

https://web.archive.org/web/20140923022250/http://mycpf.cpf.gov.sg:80/Members/CPFSchemes/ElderShield.htm

1584: 1513: 1393:"National Park Service" is a real problem. Someone stop this whole project becoming US-centric, please. 1364: 767:: Do note that the established title of this article was simply "Central Provident Fund", and thus, per 468: 39: 1882:

https://web.archive.org/web/20140616094841/http://mycpf.cpf.gov.sg/CPF/News/News-Release/N_8May2014.htm

1850:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 1661:

https://web.archive.org/web/20140923022256/http://mycpf.cpf.gov.sg:80/Members/CPFSchemes/MediShield.htm

1571:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 1213:

that discusses the "central provident fund model implanted by the British in Malaysia and Singapore."

385:

Does the CPF invest in tradable assests? If so who controls these investments, and how much is owned?

253:

need to parse the text of the entire section to understand what the current contribution rates are. --

1168:". A cursory internet search of CPF -Singapore yields no coherent usage. Am I missing something? — 348: 324: 2387: 2212: 1922:

https://web.archive.org/web/20140923022250/http://mycpf.cpf.gov.sg/Members/CPFSchemes/ElderShield.htm

1875: 1695: 1651:

https://web.archive.org/web/20140924131051/http://mycpf.cpf.gov.sg:80/Members/CPFSchemes/Medisave.htm

1641:

https://web.archive.org/web/20140603192723/http://mycpf.cpf.gov.sg:80/Members/CPFSchemes/CPF_LIFE.htm

1624: 1526: 1477: 1079:(or should redirect to a disambiguation page where more than one term is disambiguated on one page). 683:

is certainly a misleading title for me, when despite its generic appearance it turns out to be about

399: 235: 215: 1912:

https://web.archive.org/web/20140923022256/http://mycpf.cpf.gov.sg/Members/CPFSchemes/MediShield.htm

328:

is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under

2109: 2064: 2056: 2032: 1821: 1169: 1123: 1031: 732:

AjaxSmack, you say "it implies the existence of other central provident funds", I say, "how do you

631: 610: 542: 372: 195: 1902:

https://web.archive.org/web/20140924131051/http://mycpf.cpf.gov.sg/Members/CPFSchemes/Medisave.htm

1892:

https://web.archive.org/web/20140603192723/http://mycpf.cpf.gov.sg/Members/CPFSchemes/CPF_LIFE.htm

105:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

1447: 1380: 1308: 1251: 1218: 1200: 891: 718: 329: 273: 1956:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

1865: 1725:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

1614: 615:"over-precision should be avoided. Be precise, but only as precise as necessary...Remember that 1972: 1885: 1741: 1634: 942:

Why is the Singapore one the "primary" topic? Clearly, a generic topic about the phenomenon of

2356: 2328: 2239: 2196: 2060: 1428: 1278: 1236: 933: 914: 870: 784:

There is no consensus to remove the clarity in the title, so sly tricks like that won't work.

430: 289: 194:

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |

2282: 1925: 1674: 1210: 1195:

is an English adjective meaning "Making or indicative of timely preparation for the future."

1184: 2510: 2495: 2481: 2089:

On 29 May 2014, Prime Minister Lee filed a defamation lawsuit against Ngerng. In a 4 August

2052: 1915: 1664: 1423:

Oh but it is so much easier to bolster a weak argument by roiling the anti-American forces.

464: 174: 89: 1979: 1748: 2044: 1905: 1895: 1654: 1644: 1522: 1473: 1402: 955: 793: 749: 577: 517: 395: 231: 211: 2076: 1938:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 1707:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 1266: 1188: 838: 819: 627: 1978:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

1747:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

316: 2531: 2039:. Within the post, Ngerng created a chart which mapped the relationships between the 1443: 1415: 1376: 1318: 1304: 1295: 1247: 1214: 1196: 901: 887: 828: 810: 772: 714: 529: 491: 386: 269: 2105: 2015:

Does anyone care to comment or dispute this? Else I shall be removing it. Thanks.

1540: 1424: 1274: 1232: 1164:

has verifiable, established usage and a substantial article at Knowledge, as does "

1077:

If there is no primary topic, the term should be the title of a disambiguation page

929: 910: 866: 768: 445: 426: 341: 2518: 2503: 2489: 2001: 1770: 1530: 1481: 1451: 1431: 1418: 1408: 1384: 1321: 1312: 1298: 1281: 1255: 1239: 1227:

And again, for those claiming there is some other encyclopedic sense of the term,

1222: 1204: 1178: 1151: 1132: 1117: 1040: 961: 946:

would be a primary topic, but why is Singapore suddenly better than South Africa?

937: 904: 895: 873: 841: 831: 822: 813: 799: 775: 755: 703: 640: 551: 532: 523: 494: 472: 403: 389: 375: 306: 277: 262: 239: 219: 771:

guidelines, a 'no consensus' result should result in a reversion to that title.

336:

as to why its use in Knowledge articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the

1945: 1714: 1363:. Lots of countries have a national park service; but we have an article on the 900:

That article is a borderline A7 speedy, as there's no assertion of importance.

659:(which makes reference to Singapore's better-known CPF), or the Indian state of 73: 52: 2176: 2028: 1944:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 1713:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 1469: 1465: 1457: 1439: 1395: 1360: 948: 786: 742: 510: 79: 413:

I am surprised by seing CPF referred to as a "social security savings plan".

2090: 288:

Say about the pinyin, wouldn't a multilingual infobox be preferred instead?

102: 2438:"Blogger Roy Ngerng to pay $ 150,000 in damages to PM Lee in instalments" 672: 1860:

http://www.mom.gov.sg/newsroom/Pages/PressReleasesDetail.aspx?listid=408

1605:

http://www.mom.gov.sg/newsroom/Pages/PressReleasesDetail.aspx?listid=499

1595:

http://www.mom.gov.sg/newsroom/Pages/PressReleasesDetail.aspx?listid=408

1063:

Although a word, name or phrase may refer to more than one topic, it is

101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to 1499: 1142:

specifically. So with "central provident fund", whether capped or not.

182:

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

1784:, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality: 1585:

https://mycpf.cpf.gov.sg/Members/AboutUs/about-us-info/history-of-cpf

676: 663:; and even if this is only for proposed or temporary CPFs such as in 2459:"PM Lee rejects blogger Roy Ngerng's request to pay part of damages" 1303:

I can't imagine anyone making such an argument; stick to the point.

806:

Knowledge:Requested moves/Closing instructions#Determining consensus

2031:

made a post entitled "Where Your CPF Money Is Going: Learning From

2173:"Southeast Asian leaders flounder in the face of online criticism" 1876:

http://mycpf.cpf.gov.sg/Employers/Gen-Info/cpf-Contri/ContriRa.htm

1625:

http://mycpf.cpf.gov.sg/Employers/Gen-Info/cpf-Contri/ContriRa.htm

1165: 528:

To start with, I didn't say this was the only fund of this name.

425:

insurance schemes, unemployement schemes and retirement schemes).

2209:"Blogger Roy Ngerng asked to remove defamatory post about PM Lee" 2075:

On 18 May, Prime Minister (PM) Lee responded through his lawyer

1414:

notable enough for an article, then there's no problem at all.

1456:

Tony, Dick and Noetica... would any of you support the move of

1260:

Sorry, but I don't see any disambiguation page for this topic.

1799:

Final comment: I would definitely add to the title Singapore.

1508:

important (or it would have had an article before this week).

1505:

only this one particular case. So, I applaud them for trying.

996:

if it is highly likely — much more likely than any other topic

156: 15: 1866:

http://mycpf.cpf.gov.sg/CPF/News/News-Release/N_13Dec2012.htm

1615:

http://mycpf.cpf.gov.sg/CPF/News/News-Release/N_13Dec2012.htm

1886:

http://mycpf.cpf.gov.sg/CPF/News/News-Release/N_8May2014.htm

1680:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the

1635:

http://mycpf.cpf.gov.sg/CPF/News/News-Release/N_8May2014.htm

315: 2197:

https://www.ifaq.gov.sg/MOF/apps/fcd_faqmain.aspx?FAQ=66093

1026:

until this week means the Singapore usage is primary topic

1022:

That no other article on any other Central Provident Funds

1007:

A topic is primary for a term, with respect to importance,

1000:

to be the topic sought when a reader searches for that term

2283:

https://www.ifaq.gov.sg/MOF/apps/fcd_faqmain.aspx?FAQ=1559

1926:

http://mycpf.cpf.gov.sg/Members/CPFSchemes/ElderShield.htm

1854:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

1675:

http://mycpf.cpf.gov.sg/Members/CPFSchemes/ElderShield.htm

1575:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

1156:

I understand how the three words "central provident fund"

576:

First, through an inline link. For example, a passage at

210:

reference, please make sure that it is a NPOV and unbias.

2235:"Blogger accused of defaming PM Lee takes down blog post" 1916:

http://mycpf.cpf.gov.sg/Members/CPFSchemes/MediShield.htm

1665:

http://mycpf.cpf.gov.sg/Members/CPFSchemes/MediShield.htm

2007:

Removal of massive copied text from Roy Ngnerg's article

444:

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a

1906:

http://mycpf.cpf.gov.sg/Members/CPFSchemes/Medisave.htm

1896:

http://mycpf.cpf.gov.sg/Members/CPFSchemes/CPF_LIFE.htm

1847: 1781: 1655:

http://mycpf.cpf.gov.sg/Members/CPFSchemes/Medisave.htm

1645:

http://mycpf.cpf.gov.sg/Members/CPFSchemes/CPF_LIFE.htm

1568: 998:, and more likely than all the other topics combined — 487: 994:

A topic is primary for a term, with respect to usage,

804:

It's not a "sly trick", it's long-standing practice.

1539:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a

1246:

The articles exist; see the disambig page I linked.

2384:"Singapore PM wins defamation suit against activist" 1948:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 1717:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 367:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 2324:"PM Lee commences suit against blogger Roy Ngerng" 1081:The primary topic might be a broad-concept article 2378: 2376: 2374: 1789: 2057:Government of Singapore Investment Corporation 1934:This message was posted before February 2018. 1703:This message was posted before February 2018. 974:The Singapore usage is the primary topic per 8: 2262:"Blogger Roy Ngerng submits NMP application" 19: 2129: 2127: 2125: 1563:I have just modified 10 external links on 47: 2409:"Roy Ngerng found to have defamed PM Lee" 2296:"Blogger Roy Ngerng apologises to PM Lee" 1842:I have just modified 8 external links on 2352:"PM Lee responds to blogger's affidavit" 2047:, the Central Provident Fund (CPF), the 1369:Federal Information Processing Standards 598:for details on what this means). There 312:Fair use rationale for Image:CPFLogo.jpg 2121: 1775: 628:systemic geographical bias at Knowledge 49: 1776:Dr. Holzmann's comment on this article 357:Knowledge:Fair use rationale guideline 2104:On 17 December 2015 the court led by 1692:to let others know (documentation at 1464:(or something like that) and leaving 1262:Central Provident Fund (South Africa) 884:Central Provident Fund (South Africa) 186:] The anchor (#Fund probe) has been 7: 2136:"Blogger accused of defaming PM Lee" 459:The result of the move request was: 95:This article is within the scope of 2068:facilities for personal pursuits". 586:(CPF) savings from 55 to 60 years." 38:It is of interest to the following 1438:You may have noticed that I cited 539:Central Provident Fund (Singapore) 480:Central Provident Fund (Singapore) 14: 2543:Mid-importance Singapore articles 2063:regarding the relationship among 1846:. Please take a moment to review 1567:. Please take a moment to review 230:the time I post this comment. ^^ 1067:that one of these topics is the 355:. Using one of the templates at 160: 82: 72: 51: 20: 2049:Monetary Authority of Singapore 1864:Corrected formatting/usage for 1858:Corrected formatting/usage for 135:This article has been rated as 115:Knowledge:WikiProject Singapore 2548:WikiProject Singapore articles 2538:Start-Class Singapore articles 1290:Next they'll be claiming that 486:– Rather than revert the move 369:Media copyright questions page 118:Template:WikiProject Singapore 1: 1830:11:35, 22 December 2016 (UTC) 1771:09:49, 18 November 2016 (UTC) 1183:I don't know for lexeme, but 721:) 01:36, 3 October 2011 (UTC) 338:boilerplate fair use template 109:and see a list of open tasks. 2519:02:13, 20 October 2019 (UTC) 2504:22:58, 19 October 2019 (UTC) 2322:Nur Asyiqin Mohamad Salleh. 1371:. So what's different about 409:not social security to me... 390:01:14, 12 October 2007 (UTC) 365:criteria for speedy deletion 2490:09:24, 7 October 2019 (UTC) 2041:Prime Minister of Singapore 1531:22:11, 7 October 2011 (UTC) 1482:22:29, 7 October 2011 (UTC) 1462:Royal Navy (United Kingdom) 1452:15:59, 7 October 2011 (UTC) 1432:13:49, 7 October 2011 (UTC) 1419:12:41, 7 October 2011 (UTC) 1409:06:33, 7 October 2011 (UTC) 1385:20:55, 6 October 2011 (UTC) 1322:23:02, 6 October 2011 (UTC) 1313:19:58, 6 October 2011 (UTC) 1299:12:50, 6 October 2011 (UTC) 1282:21:06, 6 October 2011 (UTC) 1256:19:58, 6 October 2011 (UTC) 1240:10:33, 6 October 2011 (UTC) 1223:05:55, 6 October 2011 (UTC) 1205:04:56, 6 October 2011 (UTC) 1179:03:34, 6 October 2011 (UTC) 1152:03:16, 6 October 2011 (UTC) 1133:02:21, 6 October 2011 (UTC) 1118:00:58, 6 October 2011 (UTC) 1041:00:15, 6 October 2011 (UTC) 962:06:16, 5 October 2011 (UTC) 938:06:12, 5 October 2011 (UTC) 905:17:14, 4 October 2011 (UTC) 896:16:43, 4 October 2011 (UTC) 874:12:16, 4 October 2011 (UTC) 842:18:08, 4 October 2011 (UTC) 832:17:15, 4 October 2011 (UTC) 823:14:30, 4 October 2011 (UTC) 814:13:41, 3 October 2011 (UTC) 800:12:44, 3 October 2011 (UTC) 776:11:56, 3 October 2011 (UTC) 756:02:14, 3 October 2011 (UTC) 704:00:58, 3 October 2011 (UTC) 641:17:54, 2 October 2011 (UTC) 552:17:59, 2 October 2011 (UTC) 533:16:47, 2 October 2011 (UTC) 524:14:33, 2 October 2011 (UTC) 503:—to start with, how do you 495:12:59, 2 October 2011 (UTC) 473:21:23, 9 October 2011 (UTC) 404:22:27, 1 January 2008 (UTC) 240:22:27, 1 January 2008 (UTC) 220:01:41, 6 January 2008 (UTC) 2564: 2002:02:34, 2 August 2017 (UTC) 1965:(last update: 5 June 2024) 1839:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 1780:Dr. Holzmann has reviewed 1734:(last update: 5 June 2024) 1560:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 349:the image description page 278:07:50, 13 March 2015 (UTC) 263:03:50, 13 March 2015 (UTC) 1292:Yellowstone National Park 1162:Peripheral nervous system 1073:If a primary topic exists 1060:Is there a primary topic? 351:and edit it to include a 134: 67: 46: 2096:On 7 November 2014, the 1546:Please do not modify it. 1265:I see, you may mean the 886:; there may be others. 451:Please do not modify it. 376:04:02, 2 June 2007 (UTC) 334:explanation or rationale 205:Disputes & Criticism 2098:High Court of Singapore 2006: 1835:External links modified 1556:External links modified 1229:write the article first 944:central provident funds 863:write the article first 307:07:55, 8 May 2006 (UTC) 249:its terrible. I should 2033:The City Harvest Trial 1844:Central Provident Fund 1801: 1565:Central Provident Fund 1501:Change guideline first 1373:Central Provident Fund 1271:Central Provident Fund 882:OK, I have stubbed in 681:Central Provident Fund 619:titles are preferred." 609:policy at Knowledge. 584:Central Provident Fund 484:Central Provident Fund 320: 188:deleted by other users 28:This article is rated 1514:National Park Service 1365:National Park Service 319: 98:WikiProject Singapore 2388:Agence France Presse 2213:Agence France Presse 1946:regular verification 1715:regular verification 1083:as mentioned above. 2264:. Channel News Asia 2134:Jalelah Abu Baker. 2110:Eugene Thuraisingam 2065:City Harvest Church 1936:After February 2018 1782:this Knowledge page 1705:After February 2018 1684:parameter below to 978:(with my emphases): 1990:InternetArchiveBot 1941:InternetArchiveBot 1759:InternetArchiveBot 1710:InternetArchiveBot 1065:sometimes the case 353:fair use rationale 321: 121:Singapore articles 34:content assessment 2417:. 7 November 2014 2357:The Straits Times 2329:The Straits Times 2240:The Straits Times 2061:Channel News Asia 1966: 1735: 1149: 1115: 1028:res ipsa loquitur 725: 724: 701: 488:as Tony suggested 325:Image:CPFLogo.jpg 299: 297: 202: 201: 177:in most browsers. 155: 154: 151: 150: 147: 146: 2555: 2471: 2470: 2468: 2466: 2455: 2449: 2448: 2446: 2444: 2433: 2427: 2426: 2424: 2422: 2405: 2399: 2398: 2396: 2394: 2380: 2369: 2368: 2366: 2364: 2347: 2341: 2340: 2338: 2336: 2319: 2313: 2312: 2310: 2308: 2291: 2285: 2280: 2274: 2273: 2271: 2269: 2258: 2252: 2251: 2249: 2247: 2230: 2224: 2223: 2221: 2219: 2205: 2199: 2194: 2188: 2187: 2185: 2183: 2168: 2162: 2157: 2151: 2150: 2148: 2146: 2131: 2053:Temasek Holdings 2037:the Heart Truths 2027:On 15 May 2014, 2000: 1991: 1964: 1963: 1942: 1769: 1760: 1733: 1732: 1711: 1699: 1548: 1407: 1405: 1400: 1176: 1175: 1150: 1147: 1130: 1129: 1116: 1113: 1038: 1037: 960: 958: 953: 798: 796: 791: 754: 752: 747: 723: 722: 702: 699: 638: 637: 549: 548: 522: 520: 515: 453: 332:but there is no 298: 295: 291: 196:Reporting errors 164: 163: 157: 141:importance scale 123: 122: 119: 116: 113: 92: 90:Singapore portal 87: 86: 85: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 2563: 2562: 2558: 2557: 2556: 2554: 2553: 2552: 2528: 2527: 2476: 2475: 2474: 2464: 2462: 2457: 2456: 2452: 2442: 2440: 2435: 2434: 2430: 2420: 2418: 2407: 2406: 2402: 2392: 2390: 2382: 2381: 2372: 2362: 2360: 2349: 2348: 2344: 2334: 2332: 2321: 2320: 2316: 2306: 2304: 2293: 2292: 2288: 2281: 2277: 2267: 2265: 2260: 2259: 2255: 2245: 2243: 2232: 2231: 2227: 2217: 2215: 2207: 2206: 2202: 2195: 2191: 2181: 2179: 2170: 2169: 2165: 2158: 2154: 2144: 2142: 2133: 2132: 2123: 2045:Lee Hsien Loong 2025: 2009: 1994: 1989: 1957: 1950:have permission 1940: 1852:this simple FaQ 1837: 1778: 1763: 1758: 1726: 1719:have permission 1709: 1693: 1573:this simple FaQ 1558: 1553: 1544: 1403: 1396: 1394: 1171: 1170: 1146: 1143: 1125: 1124: 1112: 1109: 1105:Res ipsa tacet. 1085: 1033: 1032: 1015: 976:WP:PRIMARYTOPIC 956: 949: 947: 794: 787: 785: 750: 743: 741: 698: 695: 633: 632: 596:WP:PRIMARYTOPIC 578:Howe Yoon Chong 544: 543: 518: 511: 509: 449: 439: 411: 383: 314: 296: 293: 286: 247: 227: 207: 198: 180: 179: 178: 161: 120: 117: 114: 111: 110: 88: 83: 81: 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 2561: 2559: 2551: 2550: 2545: 2540: 2530: 2529: 2526: 2525: 2524: 2523: 2522: 2521: 2473: 2472: 2450: 2436:Lee, Min Kok. 2428: 2400: 2370: 2342: 2314: 2286: 2275: 2253: 2225: 2200: 2189: 2171:Han, Kirsten. 2163: 2152: 2120: 2119: 2115: 2077:Davinder Singh 2035:" on his blog 2024: 2021: 2019:Controversies 2018: 2008: 2005: 1984: 1983: 1976: 1929: 1928: 1920:Added archive 1918: 1910:Added archive 1908: 1900:Added archive 1898: 1890:Added archive 1888: 1880:Added archive 1878: 1870:Added archive 1868: 1862: 1836: 1833: 1822:ExpertIdeasBot 1819: 1818: 1810: 1803: 1787: 1777: 1774: 1753: 1752: 1745: 1678: 1677: 1669:Added archive 1667: 1659:Added archive 1657: 1649:Added archive 1647: 1639:Added archive 1637: 1629:Added archive 1627: 1619:Added archive 1617: 1609:Added archive 1607: 1599:Added archive 1597: 1589:Added archive 1587: 1579:Added archive 1557: 1554: 1552: 1551: 1541:requested move 1535: 1534: 1491: 1490: 1489: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1472:. Thanks. -- 1436: 1435: 1434: 1388: 1387: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1327: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1267:Provident fund 1207: 1189:Provident fund 1144: 1110: 1107: 1102: 1062: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1054: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1044: 1043: 1014: 1013: 1004: 985: 984: 983: 982: 981: 980: 979: 967: 966: 965: 964: 922: 921: 920: 919: 918: 917: 907: 877: 876: 855: 854: 853: 852: 851: 850: 849: 848: 847: 846: 845: 844: 779: 778: 765:Note to closer 761: 760: 759: 758: 727: 726: 707: 706: 696: 693: 689: 688: 644: 643: 623: 622: 605: 604: 590: 589: 573: 572: 567: 566: 559: 558: 557: 556: 555: 554: 478: 476: 457: 456: 446:requested move 440: 438: 437:Requested move 435: 410: 407: 382: 379: 373:BetacommandBot 313: 310: 303:Be eudaimonic! 294:vécut heureuse 292: 285: 282: 281: 280: 246: 243: 226: 223: 206: 203: 200: 199: 193: 192: 191: 175:case-sensitive 169: 168: 167: 165: 153: 152: 149: 148: 145: 144: 137:Mid-importance 133: 127: 126: 124: 107:the discussion 94: 93: 77: 65: 64: 62:Mid‑importance 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2560: 2549: 2546: 2544: 2541: 2539: 2536: 2535: 2533: 2520: 2516: 2512: 2507: 2506: 2505: 2501: 2497: 2493: 2492: 2491: 2487: 2483: 2478: 2477: 2461:. 14 Mar 2016 2460: 2454: 2451: 2439: 2432: 2429: 2416: 2415: 2410: 2404: 2401: 2389: 2385: 2379: 2377: 2375: 2371: 2359: 2358: 2353: 2350:Tham Yuen-c. 2346: 2343: 2331: 2330: 2325: 2318: 2315: 2303: 2302: 2297: 2294:Teo Xuanwei. 2290: 2287: 2284: 2279: 2276: 2263: 2257: 2254: 2242: 2241: 2236: 2233:Tham Yuen-c. 2229: 2226: 2214: 2210: 2204: 2201: 2198: 2193: 2190: 2178: 2174: 2167: 2164: 2161: 2156: 2153: 2141: 2137: 2130: 2128: 2126: 2122: 2118: 2114: 2111: 2107: 2102: 2099: 2094: 2092: 2087: 2084: 2080: 2078: 2073: 2069: 2066: 2062: 2058: 2054: 2050: 2046: 2042: 2038: 2034: 2030: 2022: 2020: 2016: 2013: 2004: 2003: 1998: 1993: 1992: 1981: 1977: 1974: 1970: 1969: 1968: 1961: 1955: 1951: 1947: 1943: 1937: 1932: 1927: 1923: 1919: 1917: 1913: 1909: 1907: 1903: 1899: 1897: 1893: 1889: 1887: 1883: 1879: 1877: 1873: 1869: 1867: 1863: 1861: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1853: 1849: 1845: 1840: 1834: 1832: 1831: 1827: 1823: 1816: 1813: 1812: 1811: 1808: 1805: 1800: 1797: 1796:comparators. 1793: 1788: 1785: 1783: 1773: 1772: 1767: 1762: 1761: 1750: 1746: 1743: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1730: 1724: 1720: 1716: 1712: 1706: 1701: 1697: 1691: 1687: 1683: 1676: 1672: 1668: 1666: 1662: 1658: 1656: 1652: 1648: 1646: 1642: 1638: 1636: 1632: 1628: 1626: 1622: 1618: 1616: 1612: 1608: 1606: 1602: 1598: 1596: 1592: 1588: 1586: 1582: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1574: 1570: 1566: 1561: 1555: 1550: 1547: 1542: 1537: 1536: 1533: 1532: 1528: 1524: 1519: 1515: 1509: 1503: 1502: 1496: 1493: 1492: 1483: 1479: 1475: 1471: 1467: 1463: 1459: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1449: 1445: 1441: 1437: 1433: 1430: 1426: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1417: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1406: 1401: 1399: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1386: 1382: 1378: 1374: 1370: 1366: 1362: 1358: 1354: 1350: 1347: 1346: 1323: 1320: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1310: 1306: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1297: 1293: 1289: 1283: 1280: 1276: 1272: 1268: 1263: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1253: 1249: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1238: 1234: 1230: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1220: 1216: 1212: 1208: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1194: 1190: 1186: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1177: 1174: 1167: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1141: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1131: 1128: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1108: 1106: 1103: 1100: 1095: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1084: 1082: 1078: 1074: 1070: 1069:primary topic 1066: 1061: 1049: 1046: 1045: 1042: 1039: 1036: 1029: 1025: 1021: 1020: 1019: 1018: 1017: 1016: 1012: 1010: 1005: 1003: 1001: 997: 992: 991: 990: 989: 977: 973: 972: 971: 970: 969: 968: 963: 959: 954: 952: 945: 941: 940: 939: 935: 931: 927: 924: 923: 916: 912: 908: 906: 903: 899: 898: 897: 893: 889: 885: 881: 880: 879: 878: 875: 872: 868: 864: 860: 857: 856: 843: 840: 835: 834: 833: 830: 826: 825: 824: 821: 817: 816: 815: 812: 807: 803: 802: 801: 797: 792: 790: 783: 782: 781: 780: 777: 774: 770: 766: 763: 762: 757: 753: 748: 746: 739: 735: 731: 730: 729: 728: 720: 716: 712: 709: 708: 705: 694: 691: 690: 686: 682: 678: 674: 670: 666: 662: 658: 654: 649: 646: 645: 642: 639: 636: 629: 625: 624: 620: 616: 613:says in part 612: 607: 606: 601: 597: 592: 591: 587: 585: 579: 575: 574: 569: 568: 564: 561: 560: 553: 550: 547: 540: 536: 535: 534: 531: 527: 526: 525: 521: 516: 514: 506: 502: 499: 498: 497: 496: 493: 489: 485: 481: 475: 474: 470: 466: 462: 455: 452: 447: 442: 441: 436: 434: 432: 428: 422: 418: 414: 408: 406: 405: 401: 397: 392: 391: 388: 380: 378: 377: 374: 370: 366: 363:described on 360: 358: 354: 350: 347:Please go to 345: 343: 339: 335: 331: 327: 326: 318: 311: 309: 308: 304: 300: 283: 279: 275: 271: 267: 266: 265: 264: 260: 256: 255:180.214.70.94 252: 245:Rates section 244: 242: 241: 237: 233: 224: 222: 221: 217: 213: 204: 197: 189: 185: 184: 183: 176: 172: 166: 159: 158: 142: 138: 132: 129: 128: 125: 108: 104: 100: 99: 91: 80: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 2463:. Retrieved 2453: 2441:. Retrieved 2431: 2419:. Retrieved 2412: 2403: 2391:. Retrieved 2361:. Retrieved 2355: 2345: 2333:. Retrieved 2327: 2317: 2305:. Retrieved 2299: 2289: 2278: 2266:. Retrieved 2256: 2244:. Retrieved 2238: 2228: 2216:. Retrieved 2203: 2192: 2180:. Retrieved 2166: 2155: 2143:. Retrieved 2139: 2116: 2106:Lee Seiu Kin 2103: 2095: 2088: 2085: 2081: 2074: 2070: 2036: 2026: 2017: 2014: 2010: 1988: 1985: 1960:source check 1939: 1933: 1930: 1841: 1838: 1820: 1814: 1809: 1806: 1802: 1798: 1794: 1790: 1786: 1779: 1757: 1754: 1729:source check 1708: 1702: 1689: 1685: 1681: 1679: 1562: 1559: 1545: 1538: 1517: 1510: 1506: 1500: 1494: 1397: 1356: 1355:generic, or 1352: 1348: 1192: 1172: 1157: 1139: 1126: 1104: 1098: 1093: 1080: 1076: 1072: 1068: 1064: 1059: 1058: 1047: 1034: 1027: 1024:even existed 1023: 1008: 1006: 999: 995: 993: 987: 986: 950: 943: 925: 858: 788: 764: 744: 738:South Africa 733: 710: 684: 652: 647: 634: 618: 614: 611:WP:PRECISION 599: 581: 562: 545: 512: 504: 500: 477: 460: 458: 450: 443: 423: 419: 415: 412: 393: 384: 371:. Thank you. 361: 346: 323: 322: 287: 250: 248: 228: 208: 181: 173:Anchors are 170: 136: 96: 40:WikiProjects 2511:Jane Dawson 2496:DreamLinker 2482:Jane Dawson 2421:13 November 2363:11 November 2182:11 November 1696:Sourcecheck 655:way, as in 537:The title " 465:Vegaswikian 30:Start-class 2532:Categories 2393:8 November 2335:8 November 2307:8 November 2246:8 November 2218:8 November 2177:Al Jazeera 2145:8 November 2117:References 2029:Roy Ngerng 2023:Roy Ngerng 1997:Report bug 1815:Reference 1766:Report bug 1523:Born2cycle 1474:Born2cycle 1470:Royal Navy 1466:Royal Navy 1458:Royal Navy 1440:Royal Navy 1361:Royal Navy 1231:, please. 1211:here's one 1099:particular 461:page moved 396:Anti.Exams 381:Investing? 232:Anti.Exams 212:Anti.Exams 2091:affidavit 1980:this tool 1973:this tool 1749:this tool 1742:this tool 1518:obviously 1193:provident 1185:this book 1173:AjaxSmack 1127:AjaxSmack 1035:AjaxSmack 839:GTBacchus 820:GTBacchus 665:Hong Kong 635:AjaxSmack 546:AjaxSmack 112:Singapore 103:Singapore 59:Singapore 2465:16 March 2443:16 March 2055:and the 1986:Cheers.— 1755:Cheers.— 1444:Dohn joe 1377:Dohn joe 1357:could be 1305:Dicklyon 1248:Dicklyon 1215:Dicklyon 1197:Dicklyon 888:Dicklyon 715:Dicklyon 673:Shenzhen 669:Shenzhen 657:Shanghai 571:article. 387:Kevlar67 342:fair use 330:fair use 270:Zhanzhao 2268:13 June 2140:MyPaper 2051:(MAS), 1848:my edit 1682:checked 1569:my edit 1495:Support 1349:Support 1101:queen). 930:Jenks24 926:Support 859:Support 648:Oppose. 617:concise 603:needed. 580:reads: 563:Support 427:Toh-mah 190:before. 139:on the 1690:failed 1416:Powers 1404:(talk) 1353:sounds 1319:Powers 1296:Powers 1148:oetica 1114:oetica 1094:exists 957:(talk) 902:Powers 829:Powers 811:Powers 795:(talk) 773:Powers 751:(talk) 711:Oppose 700:oetica 677:Kerala 661:Kerala 530:Powers 519:(talk) 501:Oppose 492:Powers 284:Pinyin 225:Rating 36:scale. 2414:Today 2301:Today 1429:wiser 1425:older 1279:wiser 1275:older 1237:wiser 1233:older 1166:queen 1158:could 1030:. — 915:wiser 911:older 871:wiser 867:older 769:WP:RM 653:their 630:. — 290:Elle 2515:talk 2500:talk 2486:talk 2467:2016 2445:2016 2423:2014 2395:2014 2365:2014 2337:2014 2309:2014 2270:2014 2248:2014 2220:2014 2184:2014 2147:2014 1826:talk 1686:true 1527:talk 1478:talk 1448:talk 1398:Tony 1381:talk 1309:talk 1252:talk 1219:talk 1209:And 1201:talk 951:Tony 934:talk 892:talk 789:Tony 745:Tony 734:know 719:talk 667:and 513:Tony 505:know 469:talk 431:talk 400:talk 274:talk 259:talk 236:talk 216:talk 171:Tip: 1954:RfC 1924:to 1914:to 1904:to 1894:to 1884:to 1874:to 1723:RfC 1700:). 1688:or 1673:to 1663:to 1653:to 1643:to 1633:to 1623:to 1613:to 1603:to 1593:to 1583:to 1543:. 1460:to 1048:All 685:one 600:may 251:not 131:Mid 2534:: 2517:) 2502:) 2488:) 2411:. 2386:. 2373:^ 2354:. 2326:. 2298:. 2237:. 2211:. 2175:. 2138:. 2124:^ 2043:, 1967:. 1962:}} 1958:{{ 1828:) 1736:. 1731:}} 1727:{{ 1698:}} 1694:{{ 1529:) 1521:-- 1480:) 1450:) 1427:≠ 1383:) 1375:? 1311:) 1277:≠ 1254:) 1235:≠ 1221:) 1203:) 1140:or 1071:. 1011:." 936:) 913:≠ 894:) 869:≠ 865:. 740:. 482:→ 471:) 463:. 448:. 433:) 402:) 344:. 305:) 276:) 261:) 238:) 218:) 2513:( 2498:( 2484:( 2469:. 2447:. 2425:. 2397:. 2367:. 2339:. 2311:. 2272:. 2250:. 2222:. 2186:. 2149:. 1999:) 1995:( 1982:. 1975:. 1824:( 1768:) 1764:( 1751:. 1744:. 1525:( 1476:( 1446:( 1379:( 1307:( 1250:( 1217:( 1199:( 1145:N 1111:N 1002:. 932:( 890:( 837:- 717:( 697:N 467:( 429:( 398:( 301:( 272:( 257:( 234:( 214:( 143:. 42::

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index