Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Change detection

Source đź“ť

213:, while your reference is not. Also I do not think applications need to be explained in detail; this is an encyclopedia, not a survey. Example sections are usually just advertisement for some crappy papers; and nobody reads that part. One or two words each, with no references, is enough to know it can be done. You are welcome to improve the text of the article, but don't add dubious sources again, thank you. Also, don't just try to come up with an excuse to re-add the reference. I doubt it is "likely to be challenged" that change detection has been used in medicine; so no need to reference that (and again, preferably find a highly cited book that lists this use case)! Adding references like your does 170:
technique for minimax change detection is the CUSUM procedure.", "Change detection tests are often used in manufacturing, , website tracking, and medical diagnostics"). Moreover, several sections are not concise and complete (Minimax change detection, offline change detection, applications of change detection). Content (with sources) is missing such that the article is not informative and useful up to now. Thus, it is clear that the article is rated as "Start-Class" and "Low-Importance". Content and sources are missing. Finally, "Linguistic change detection" belongs to the section "Applications of change detection" from my point of view.
74: 53: 236:
cited was definitely needed. Moreover, I absolutely disagree that there is no need of sections on applications and that nobody reads these parts. If you have a look on the high-quality articles (WP:STATS) on statistical models, you will see that various applications are explained for almost all of them. Moreover, the added reference you called "dubious source" is a reliable, published source (WP:SCHOLARSHIP). In this context, note also WP:MEDDATE
392: 22: 174:
B) Adding important content: The EWMA procedure is missing in the section "Minimax change detection". In section "offline change detection", other clustering algorithms should be mentioned. Moreover, applications should be explained in more detail (incl. providing the respective citable sources), like in section "Linguistic change detection". That generates content to make this section useful.
235:
It is clear that it is not needed to have citations on each sentence. However, I really doubt that it is obvious that change detection procedures are used in medical DIAGNOSTICS. The application of change detection procedures in spatial statistics is "likely to be challenged", so the reference I have
208:
but only for "likely to be challenged" claims. In particular, not a 2016 source that is far from well-known but only cited once, by the author himself. If you want to add references to statements, please check first if the Basseville textbook is suitable. That book may also provide a guideline of how
173:
My proposal: A) Reordering of the sections including subsections: 1 Types of change detection, 1.1 Online change detection, 1.2 Offline change detection, 1.3 Minimax change detection, 2. Applications of change detections, 2.1 Applications of change detection tests, 2.2 Linguistic change detection.
357:
reference are? Sorry, I have good reasons to assume that you have a COI and at least know one of the authors personally and thus may be biased and overestimate the relevancy. Even if you claim to not have a COI there are good reasons to believe otherwise. And your behavior also clearly shows that
169:
From my perspective, the article needs some important revisions. Up to now, there are several contents without any sources (e.g., "In a Bayes change-detection problem, a prior distribution is available for the change time", "Online change detection is also done using streaming algorithms", "A key
281:. In fact, the 1993 Basseville book I mentioned above has a section with examples, including "11.2.2 Biomedical Signal Processing" giving several sources from the 1970s and 1980s, or e.g. this from 1999: 124: 404: 360:
you don't appear to be really interested in improving the article, but are obsessed with getting that one marginally relevant reference into Knowledge (XXG)
452: 114: 457: 447: 90: 277:
Clearly, your only interest is dropping this one reference on Knowledge (XXG) rather than actually improving the article. As a matter of fact,
258: 416: 81: 58: 33: 350: 324: 245: 189: 278: 367: 294: 222: 262: 39: 21: 254: 177: 428: 89:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
73: 52: 282: 363: 290: 218: 155: 147: 395:
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between
316: 237: 181: 146:
I think we must mention non-statistical uses if we do not want the article to merely duplicate
424: 412: 320: 241: 185: 408: 279:
Google Scholar has many earlier mentions of change point detection in medical diagnosis
151: 441: 289:
publication to be cited, not the most relevant publications... stop advertising.
391: 86: 432: 371: 328: 298: 249: 226: 193: 159: 283:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361841599800012
15: 209:
to structure the article. Because as far as I can tell,
206:
we do not need a citation on every sentence and example
315:
There is no conflict of interest according to WP:COI.
85:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 285:. Your have a conflict of interest here: you want 386:Wiki Education assignment: Human Cognition SP23 200:As for reordering, I don't know. The article 8: 349:Then why is the IP you edited with above at 19: 252: 175: 47: 217:increase the article quality, you know. 49: 99:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Statistics 7: 79:This article is within the scope of 38:It is of interest to the following 453:Low-importance Statistics articles 400: 396: 204:look like it can be improved. But 14: 403:. Further details are available 390: 72: 51: 20: 458:WikiProject Statistics articles 448:Start-Class Statistics articles 119:This article has been rated as 102:Template:WikiProject Statistics 1: 423:— Assignment last updated by 372:21:15, 16 November 2016 (UTC) 329:09:18, 16 November 2016 (UTC) 299:21:52, 15 November 2016 (UTC) 250:17:03, 15 November 2016 (UTC) 93:and see a list of open tasks. 353:, where the authors of that 351:Viadrina European University 227:19:47, 22 October 2016 (UTC) 211:this book a respected source 194:12:13, 22 October 2016 (UTC) 160:01:12, 13 January 2008 (UTC) 474: 433:19:53, 13 April 2023 (UTC) 118: 67: 46: 82:WikiProject Statistics 28:This article is rated 407:. Student editor(s): 32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 148:sequential analysis 105:Statistics articles 405:on the course page 34:content assessment 266: 257:comment added by 196: 180:comment added by 139: 138: 135: 134: 131: 130: 465: 435: 417:article contribs 402: 398: 394: 125:importance scale 107: 106: 103: 100: 97: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 473: 472: 468: 467: 466: 464: 463: 462: 438: 437: 422: 397:20 January 2023 388: 167: 144: 104: 101: 98: 95: 94: 61: 29: 12: 11: 5: 471: 469: 461: 460: 455: 450: 440: 439: 387: 384: 383: 382: 381: 380: 379: 378: 377: 376: 375: 374: 364:HelpUsStopSpam 338: 337: 336: 335: 334: 333: 332: 331: 306: 305: 304: 303: 302: 301: 291:HelpUsStopSpam 270: 269: 268: 267: 259:193.174.122.17 230: 229: 219:HelpUsStopSpam 166: 163: 143: 140: 137: 136: 133: 132: 129: 128: 121:Low-importance 117: 111: 110: 108: 91:the discussion 77: 65: 64: 62:Low‑importance 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 470: 459: 456: 454: 451: 449: 446: 445: 443: 436: 434: 430: 426: 420: 418: 414: 410: 406: 393: 385: 373: 369: 365: 361: 356: 352: 348: 347: 346: 345: 344: 343: 342: 341: 340: 339: 330: 326: 322: 318: 314: 313: 312: 311: 310: 309: 308: 307: 300: 296: 292: 288: 284: 280: 276: 275: 274: 273: 272: 271: 264: 260: 256: 251: 247: 243: 239: 234: 233: 232: 231: 228: 224: 220: 216: 212: 207: 203: 199: 198: 197: 195: 191: 187: 183: 179: 171: 164: 162: 161: 157: 153: 149: 141: 126: 122: 116: 113: 112: 109: 92: 88: 84: 83: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 425:Dhermatology 421: 413:Dhermatology 389: 359: 354: 286: 253:— Preceding 214: 210: 205: 201: 176:— Preceding 172: 168: 145: 120: 80: 40:WikiProjects 401:15 May 2023 30:Start-class 442:Categories 409:AbigailG23 96:Statistics 87:statistics 59:Statistics 165:Revisions 152:Adoniscik 142:Direction 325:contribs 255:unsigned 246:contribs 190:contribs 178:unsigned 123:on the 317:PhilOt 238:PhilOt 182:PhilOt 36:scale. 429:talk 399:and 368:talk 362:... 321:talk 295:talk 287:your 263:talk 242:talk 223:talk 202:does 186:talk 156:talk 419:). 355:one 215:not 150:.-- 115:Low 444:: 431:) 411:, 370:) 327:) 323:• 297:) 265:) 248:) 244:• 225:) 192:) 188:• 158:) 427:( 415:( 366:( 319:( 293:( 261:( 240:( 221:( 184:( 154:( 127:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Statistics
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Statistics
statistics
the discussion
Low
importance scale
sequential analysis
Adoniscik
talk
01:12, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
unsigned
PhilOt
talk
contribs
12:13, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
HelpUsStopSpam
talk
19:47, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
PhilOt
talk
contribs
17:03, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
unsigned
193.174.122.17
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑