Talk:Charles D. Lavine

615:

Speaker of the Assembly. 2) In the wake of the Israeli Flotilla incident Lavine sent a letter to U.S. President Barack Obama urging that America's support of Israel should remain resolute; however, during the 2008 presidential election, Lavine participated in "Hugs for Obama" as a key supporter of Obama's "Organizing for America" campaign. 3)In the wake of the Israeli Flotilla incident Lavine sent a letter to U.S. President Barack Obama urging that America's support of Israel should remain resolute; however, during the 2008 presidential election, Lavine participated in "Hugs for Obama" as a key supporter of Obama's "Organizing for America" campaign.

359: 1146:

listing ratings by randomly picked political groups- again, no rationale for which ones are picked. So is picking random votes to highlight with no explanation- why would Lavine voting on one bill be mentioned out of hundreds of votes, especially if he was in the majority? This just isn't a well structured article. If you want to add in relevant information, feel free to do so, but please don't keep reverting to a badly done page.

227: 283: 259: 422: 74: 293: 165: 141: 110: 819: 772:"Phil Meyer is Professor Emeritus in the School of Journalism and Mass Communication at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill" and "Jeff Jarvis is the associate professor and director of the interactive journalism program at the City University of New York’s new Graduate School of Journalism." It appears that they have oversight of all Patch.com content. 412: 391: 1917: 936:"Not only did he receive praise from local community leaders for his efforts in the assembly but also Lavine for Good Government received a generous campaign contribution. American Traffic Solutions (ATS), the beneficiary of the red-light traffic camera project in Nassau County, donated $ 1,000 to Lavine's campaign in 2009." 1084:

the article to discussing three specific cases Lavine worked on as a lawyer over a decade ago, why those specific cases were chosen, etc. I also have removed some innuendo such as the suggestion he installed red light cameras in exchange for a bribe from the manufacturer. This type of writing is original research at best.

871:. That will not only clear up the controversy here, but establish community consensus on patch.com as a source. Finally, let me gently remind both editors that that policy defines edit warring as "try to force own position by combative editing (making edits they know will be opposed) and repeated reverting" and that the 175: 930:"In the wake of the Israeli Flotilla incident Lavine sent a letter to U.S. President Barack Obama urging that America's support of Israel should remain resolute; however, during the 2008 presidential election, Lavine participated in "Hugs for Obama" as a key supporter of Obama's "Organizing for America" campaign." 1769:

so make a section about common core. But the "local officials" phrasing is still incredibly confusing. Local to where? New York State? The board of regents covers the whole state. Local to Lavine's district? No, the source doesn't back that up. I'm happy to let you change the writing to avoid further

1087:

I don't want to create a pro-Lavine puff piece any more than you do. I'm happy to work together to create a neutral, fair, useful page. I am not, however, interested in getting into an edit war with a single user who impersonates my name, creates multiple accounts, and acts in bad faith. I was hoping

502:

This page has clearly been taken over by Assemblyman Lavine's campaign staff in order to present his record in the most positive light prior to the election in three and a half weeks. All negative material, much of which has appeared on this page for nearly five years, has been scrubbed and replaced

1738:

I disagree, several Democrats voted against the re-election of these members, and this has to do directly with Common Core. The vote signified a stance on the issue, and just because NYRambler doesn't like it doesn't mean it should be deleted. This is a verified vote, sourced properly, and meets all

1681:

This sentence is confusing. Without knowing who voted against it or why, how is it helpful? What does 'local elected officials' even mean? Local is different depending on where you are. It literally is just saying "Lavine voted for X, which is interesting because some unknown number of other unnamed

1076:

614:

It appears that the Charles Lavine's wikipedia page has multiple instances of bias towards the person of interest. This clearly is in violation of Knowledge's POV guidelines on biographies of living persons. Examples below: 1) Lavine campaigned on "Fix Albany" but voted to re-elect Sheldon Silver as

1702:

I reverted this section (possibly the edit you're referring to) but after reading the referenced article I think the section should be deleted entirely. The source indicates that the Senate and Assembly are anticipated to vote along party lines, and in fact did so, so the fact that a Democrat voted

1083:

Not sure who wrote the above section, but assuming it's a reference to me, I'll respond- I do not work for Charles Lavine, though I am a resident of Glen Cove, where he represents. I have removed or condensed some information- for example, I'm not sure why anyone feels it's necessary to devote half

1526:

and will get you blocked. "MTA payroll tax" (notice no capitals = not its proper name) is a biased description for the legislation which is used by the some sources to cast it in a deliberately negative light. In full, they call it the "job-killing MTA payroll tax". That's far from a neutral name.

1379:

Can someone who isn't already vested in this particular dispute help lay out a good heuristic here? If we're getting down to the level of which appointed officials he's voted to reinstate (as with the Board of Regents, currently on the page) this is going to be a massive, massive Knowledge article

1127:

I do not wish to engage in an edit war. I'm also a resident of the district, who has used pages like Knowledge to inform myself on my local elected officials for years. All of a sudden, a couple of weeks before the election, somebody comes and suspiciously removes 90% of the information that was

1032:

NYRAMBLERR (an obvious attempt to imitate my username) has reverted my attempts to remove NPOV and BLP problems, add correct citations, etc. They did this without explanation and re-inserted improperly sourced/formatted material as well as NPOV material. I reverted to the last draft of the article

1307:

similarly, I'm really not sure how we arrived at these choices for bills to highlight- out of dozens of options, what's the rationale for these? Why not discuss his actions as chair of the ethics committee, which were pretty high profile? Why are red light cameras such an issue but tax breaks for

1145:

Again, a ton of the stuff on here violates Knowledge's guidelines on BLP. The cherry picking of three totally random criminal defense cases, for example, makes no sense- there's no rationale for picking those cases, and his work as a lawyer decades ago is barely relevant in the first place. So is

985:

as far as I know I'm the only poster here with a pro-Lavine bias, and I'm really trying to be neutral and not insert promotional material; I just would like to see the slander removed (for example, the line suggesting be installed red light cameras in exchange for a donation, cherry picking three

1191:

Listing four ratings with no context is not descriptive of an "economic record." They appear cherry picked (not to be positive or negative, but just randomly) and the language is unencyclopedic throughout. I would suggest removing the paragraph entirely, or alternatively adding a section listing

926:

This article has a lot of problems I'd like to try to fix. There's consistent innuendo, personal attacks, and NPOV material. It doesn't conform to the WIKI:BLP and more generally it has a lot of format problems. It comes across as a campaign attacking Lavine, because (for example) it prominently

861:

I've taken a look at glencove.patch.com and the question of its reliability seems to me to be very, very close. It does not appear to be a site where just any member of the public can post anything they please and a number of those who can post have titles such as "Verifier" and "Editor". If you

1131:

Significant and noteworthy events, such as the sponsorship of the MTA Tax and Speed Camera and Red Light Camera legislation, have been removed. These were major pieces of legislation, one of them being Assemblyman Lavine's signature bill, but for some reason they have been deemed not worthy of

1138:

As for "breaking the page" - I am not an experienced web designer, all I have done is hit "undo" to your previous edits. If you wish to further edit the page after I do this, please go right ahead. But please do so without deleting every bit of relevant information from the page. Thank you.

970:

violation, even if it might not be obvious to the casual reader. With that said, there's probably some pro-Lavine socking on going as well, which doesn't help matters. To be honest, if it were up to me I'd just stub the article and fully protect it until after the election, unfortunately my

554:" ("The threshold for inclusion in Knowledge is verifiability, not truth: whether readers can check that material in Knowledge has already been published by a reliable source, not whether editors think it is true"). The reader should note that this began last year on August 10, 2010: 1330:

Again, the issue isn't whether info is properly sourced but rather whether it's being presented in an encyclopedic manner. Are you suggesting we add sections for every single relevant/interesting/contentiousn vote Lavine has taken? If so this is going to be an incredibly long article.

875:

says, "Remember that an administrator may still act whenever they believe a user's behavior constitutes edit warring, and any user may report edit-warring, even if the three-revert rule has not been breached. The rule is not an entitlement to revert a page a specific number of times."

1091:

PS. You also keep breaking the page. Why is LGBT rights under economic record? Why does electoral history appear both above and below the references? If you're going to edit war in an attempt to prevent anyone from improving the material, at least put some effort into it.

866:

and can find no substantial discussions about the reliability of patch.com. I am, therefore, going to punt on this one: My opinion is that if the editor who is asserting patch.com cares to continue to assert it as such that they ought to ask for a review of it at the

1434:

The current version has way to many problems, including the ones you just added back in. I assume you wouldn't want to let everyone else make a bunch of changes and then freeze the page, either. Stubbing it and locking seems to be the only way we'll avoid protracted

1564:

I think it might be different. I think Radman23 is correct in using the language that every major outlet, and legislator, has used for the legislation. This is a major issue 4 years after it was passed, and Lavine has been a big supporter of it. It needs to stay.

745:

Professional editorial advisory board? At this particular patch site (Glen Cove, NY), their "advisory board" includes, among others, a high school senior, a newspaper intern, an amateur photographer, and more "freelance writers" than you can shake a stick at

1573:

This is a classic example of a line that appears technically true but is intentionally misleading. You could also write "Lavine was the only Democrat over 60 to sponsor the legislation," implying that, I don't know, elderly people were against the bill.

1374:

I really think we need to work out a better way to handle this. As it stands we're making entries not just for bills he's sponsored, or even voted for (which there are several hundreds of alone, according to NYAssembly page) but even things he's

965:

rules. For instance, the list of cases that he was involved in, which has clearly been cherrypicked to make it look like Lavine enjoys defending murderers and copkillers. It can all be sourced, but it's cherrypicking, and quite obviously an

585:

Your IP address makes you a concerned citizen from Albany, New York (the state capitol) who deletes verifiable information on an elected official. The reader should view the similar edits that occurred at 19:13 and 19:14 on 27 March 11 here:

1238:

I undid the addition again. I agree with the previous talk thread that these three cases seem cherry-picked to put him in a negative light. If the article needs a section on his defense cases, it needs to be balanced. As the thread said, see

1703:

the same way as most/all other Democrats, and most/all Republicans voted differently, seems irrelevant here. This could be made into a section about Common Core if there were a source on Lavine's stance on it, but I didn't find one.

1787:

It is local to Lavine's district because those members craft education policy that, in turn, is the curriculum of the school districts in Lavine's district. This passage is very relevant, especially in light of differing opinions.

581:

As a concerned citizen, I felt compelled to delete material published on the page that contained obvious spin and had point of view infractions. I again call for a disclaimer at the head of the page to warn viewers.- 20101234abc

1347:

That's what Knowledge is for. To document these types of issues. It's an encyclopedia. Documenting votes a politician takes isn't unusual, neither is talking about high profile cases a criminal defense attorney defends.

1598:

This was a bill sponsored by NYC Democrats, the other sponsor outside of the New York City metro area was Lavine. I don't think it's wrong or bias to elaborate on that point. That's what makes this situation unique.

927:

emphasizes three examples of people he defended as a lawyer who are likely to be controversial, and places them at the front of the article, without any explanation of relevance, or context. Other problematic lines:

2015: 241: 1462:

It's also not ok to change "Funding the Metropolitan Transit Authority" to "MTA Tax Bill." A8180 did more than change the tax code, it's not called the MTA Tax Bill, and not everyone even knows what the MTA is.

1292:

Criminal defense lawyers also defend the innocent and wrongfully accused, and win some of their cases. As I said, if we're going to cover his law career, it needs to be balanced to avoid the appearance of POV.

2010: 942:

To disclose any potential bias, I am a resident of Lavine's district and I voted for him. That's why I'd like to add this to the NPOV noticeboard, or request comment, before making a ton of changes myself.

862:

click on the "Send us a news tip" link, a text comes up which says that tips are sent to local editors. So there does seem to be some degree — who knows how rigorous — of editorial oversight. I've searched

1538:

the MTA Payroll Tax, and it is not. And furthermore, NYRambler is correct that specifying in this section that he is the "only Assemblymember from Long Island", or any other unpublished qualifier, is

1883:

Knowledge:Requests_for_page_protection#Charles_Lavine_.28edit.C2.A0.7C_talk.C2.A0.7C_history.C2.A0.7C_protect.C2.A0.7C_delete.C2.A0.7C_links.C2.A0.7C_watch.C2.A0.7C_logs.C2.A0.7C_views.29

844:

is informal and I have no special powers or authority apart from being a fresh pair of eyes. Third opinions are not tiebreakers and should not be "counted" in determining whether or not

1383:

I'm becoming more amenable to the idea proposed earlier, that we just make this article a stub and then edit-protect it until the election is over. Could we get consensus around that?

1132:

inclusion on this page. Instead, they have been replaced with material touting the Assemblyman's support of LGBT rights which appears to be taken directly from his campaign website.

236: 151: 1482:

MTA Payroll Tax is not a made up name. It is the name used by every major news source to refer to the major and controversial portion of the legislation which created the tax. See

707:

and should not be used as one in a Knowledge article. I've also gone through the article, trimming a lot of tangential material, and removing a lot of promo/POV material as well.

2035: 343: 2020: 1459:

Please stop inserting "MTA Payroll Tax" as a substitute name for A8180. That's not the name of the bill, and continuing to insert it is a violation of both WIKI:OR and WIKI:V.

54: 1969: 349: 84:

who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy.

1308:

veterans aren't? This whole article seems very carefully designed to technically meet standards for citing sources while leaving the most negative possible impression.

2030: 1483: 558:

While "20101234abc" actions demonstrate a possible COI, the individual should use the "Talk" page before deleting sourced content. This will avoid possible "

1995: 59: 1128:

once on the page. To me, that reeks of partisanship and seems like an obvious attempt to scrub the page of all content which may be perceived as negative.

319: 42:) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or 2045: 480: 470: 1534:

But notwithstanding NPOV, the way in which Radman added this information to the article presents it in a biased way, implying that the legislation is

1631:

are very good at illustrating why this is a problem. Is there a source that treats it as important that Lavine was the only cosponsor outside NYC?

2040: 2025: 2005: 849: 193: 34: 1882: 1162:

Please read the guidelines on BLP and NPOV, and also check out some other articles on local politicians that have been given good evaluations.

306: 264: 1647: 1522:

Radman is right on this one, partly, but regardless you need to stop using reverts to enforce your preferred version of the article. That's

446: 197: 1771: 1417: 1355: 1334: 1317: 1277: 1223: 1198: 1172: 1149: 1115: 1013: 992: 372: 1314:

Red light cameras is a major issue/debate happening on Long Island right now. This is relevant information, and properly sourced too.

201: 837:. I have made no previous edits on Charles D. Lavine and have no known association with the editors involved in this discussion. The 1865: 1804: 1665: 1615: 1494: 634: 367: 269: 1006:

The ratings were in relation to Lavine's economic record, and it had both positive and negative ratings. Spanning from 0% to 90%.

729:

How does Patch.com's professional editorial advisory board not make this website a reliable source? I ask for a third party review.

192:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to 1486: 887: 841: 1755: 1399: 799: 761: 718: 435: 396: 188: 146: 87: 519: 1627:

It becomes bias to highlight that point if sources haven't already treated it as a notable concern. The examples given at

1251:

to mention only cases involving morally repugnant defendants (a cop killer, a terrorist, and someone who hired a hitman).

1503: 1977: 1135:

I am not trying to engage in an "edit war," and there would not be one if you did not insist on deleting this material.

986:

negative ratings out of dozens, etc. I'm definitely not sockpuppeting at least (this IP is NYRambler, just on my phone).

121: 1488:, from Long Island's major newspaper publication for examples. This example is from the New York State Senate website 2000: 1216:

These 3 were high profile cases that got substantial media coverage. I revised the wording to make it more neutral.

618:

Thanks for your consideration. I believe a disclaimer is necessary to warm readers of the apparent POV violation.

1962: 1669: 1619: 1593: 906: 671: 1088:

to make this the first of a lot of projects on the Glen Cove area, and I'd like to work this out and move on.

109: 1958:

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

1775: 1498: 1119: 1973: 1421: 1359: 1338: 1321: 1281: 1227: 1202: 1176: 1165:

NYRambler is a supporter of Lavine, the constant deletion of relevant and well sourced votes is malicious.

1153: 1017: 996: 551: 298: 43: 1940: 1901: 1836: 559: 1751: 1648:

http://www.newsday.com/news/region-state/albany-says-no-bailout-for-mta-after-payroll-tax-fails-1.1644001

1861: 1800: 1661: 1611: 630: 127: 1857: 1796: 1657: 1607: 626: 1944: 1905: 1853: 1840: 1792: 1743: 1708: 1653: 1636: 1603: 1581:

for the bill, and so the sentence creates the impression of a geopolitical divide where none exists.

1554: 1413: 1387: 1351: 1273: 1219: 1168: 1111: 1058: 1009: 777: 773: 734: 730: 692: 688: 622: 599: 595: 567: 563: 507: 53:. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to 1747: 1722: 1688: 1585: 1469: 1441: 1391: 1095: 1039: 947: 788:

Where do you see that? I don't see it on the Glen Cove site, which is the one you're trying to use.

1726: 1692: 1628: 1589: 1539: 1508: 1473: 1445: 1395: 1099: 1043: 951: 891: 794: 756: 713: 656: 652: 511: 95: 1820:

To all involved, KNOCK IT OFF. Discuss it and resolve it here, but stop mucking up the article. --

445:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

318:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

1512: 515: 91: 57:.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see 1523: 961:

There is a lot of material here that is subtle in slandering Lavine, but also clearly against

1298: 1256: 427: 315: 180: 1410:

I'm for keeping the version the way it is and holding all edits until after the election.

1929: 1925: 1890: 1886: 1825: 1821: 1704: 1632: 1550: 1248: 1054: 358: 50: 1549:

Curious: is this the same tax as the Metropolitan Commuter Transportation Mobility Tax?

1195:

Simply saying he got X% from random and obscure organizations doesn't tell us anything.

1528: 1267: 1244: 972: 967: 845: 789: 751: 708: 971:

application for complete impunity seems to have been held up at the WMF offices ;-).

226: 1989: 1954:

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

1543: 1240: 1033:

before NYRAMBLERR's edits (i.e. I did not revert other changes made since my edits).

962: 872: 868: 863: 556:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Charles_Lavine&limit=500&action=history

686:

No spam from Patch.com (online news website). All items are appropriately sourced.

1489: 834: 704: 17: 1270:

Refusing to post it because it may be perceived as negative is a bias in itself.

73: 1849:

Is there anyway we can stop any edits on this article until after the election?

848:

has been reached. My personal standards for issuing third opinions can be viewed

1936: 1897: 1832: 1685:

Also, please use talk page, not revert edit summaries, to discuss these issues.

1294: 1252: 838: 818: 282: 258: 164: 140: 503:

with obviously political material which mirrors campaign talking points.

417: 311: 288: 170: 81: 588:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk:Charles_Lavine&action=history

441: 1981: 1948: 1909: 1869: 1844: 1808: 1779: 1759: 1730: 1712: 1696: 1640: 1558: 1516: 1477: 1449: 1425: 1403: 1363: 1342: 1325: 1302: 1285: 1260: 1231: 1206: 1180: 1157: 1123: 1103: 1062: 1047: 1021: 1000: 975: 955: 912: 804: 781: 766: 738: 723: 696: 677: 638: 603: 571: 536:"20101234abc" continues to delete properly sourced and verified information 523: 1077:

with obviously political material which mirrors campaign talking points.

1677:"This was a departure from local elected officials who voted against it" 439:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of 933:

This seems to imply some sort of duplicity, for no reason I can see.

1507:

This legislation is universally referred to as the MTA Payroll Tax.

411: 390: 200:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the 1932: 1893: 1828: 747: 939:

Is there evidence this is related? This is really blatant NPOV.

1531:(a core policy) dictates that we follow the POV of the sources. 1721:

Agreed. That applies to the MTA legislation as well, actually.

103: 68: 49:

from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially

26: 1527:

However, it is a name that major sources have picked up, and

357: 225: 2016:

Low-importance biography (politics and government) articles

2011:

Start-Class biography (politics and government) articles

310:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the 1770:

edit warring but it does need to be changed. -NYRambler

587: 555: 1569:"Only Democrat who wasn't from NYC to cosponsor A8180" 1266:

He's a criminal defense lawyer, he defends criminals.

86:

For that reason, this article is at increased risk of

550:). The information is IAW Knowledge's guideline of " 1192:Lavine's ratings from a broad selection of groups. 833:I am responding to a third opinion request made at 1682:people voted against X." That's not encyclopedic. 1577:The reality is that many Democrats outside of NYC 348:This article has not yet received a rating on the 1568: 655:for purpose of giving requested Third Opinion. — 1455:Making up names for things is against Wiki rules 592:20101234abc's actions demonstrate a possible COI 370:, a project which is currently considered to be 1968:Participate in the deletion discussion at the 8: 2036:Unknown-importance New York (state) articles 2021:Politics and government work group articles 1493:More examples from outside of Long Island: 107: 1370:Legislation Lavine has supported/voted for 385: 253: 135: 387: 255: 137: 328:Knowledge:WikiProject New York (state) 237:the politics and government work group 2031:Start-Class New York (state) articles 1739:the requirements necessary to stay. 331:Template:WikiProject New York (state) 7: 886:Once you've considered this opinion 433:This article is within the scope of 366:This article is within the scope of 304:This article is within the scope of 186:This article is within the scope of 1996:Biography articles of living people 750:). Hardly a professional anything. 126:It is of interest to the following 653:User_talk:Tnxman307#Charles_Lavine 25: 2046:Low-importance Wisconsin articles 1542:and not allowed. Especially in a 823:Response to Third Opinion Request 1915: 1053:Blocked, as is a probable sock. 817: 590:Again I reiterate my claim that 420: 410: 389: 291: 281: 257: 173: 163: 139: 108: 72: 32:This article must adhere to the 475:This article has been rated as 455:Knowledge:WikiProject Wisconsin 210:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography 2041:Start-Class Wisconsin articles 2026:WikiProject Biography articles 2006:Start-Class biography articles 1380:(as in, longer than Obama's). 913:15:12, 10 September 2010 (UTC) 805:13:16, 10 September 2010 (UTC) 782:12:02, 10 September 2010 (UTC) 767:11:52, 10 September 2010 (UTC) 739:11:46, 10 September 2010 (UTC) 724:02:22, 10 September 2010 (UTC) 678:15:12, 10 September 2010 (UTC) 458:Template:WikiProject Wisconsin 213:Template:WikiProject Biography 1: 1036:As always, open for comment. 697:22:24, 9 September 2010 (UTC) 449:and see a list of open tasks. 322:and see a list of open tasks. 234:This article is supported by 35:biographies of living persons 1982:23:46, 28 October 2020 (UTC) 1949:19:05, 16 October 2014 (UTC) 1910:20:06, 14 October 2014 (UTC) 1870:18:50, 14 October 2014 (UTC) 1845:18:43, 14 October 2014 (UTC) 1809:20:39, 14 October 2014 (UTC) 1780:20:11, 14 October 2014 (UTC) 1760:18:39, 14 October 2014 (UTC) 1731:18:29, 14 October 2014 (UTC) 1713:18:28, 14 October 2014 (UTC) 1697:16:24, 14 October 2014 (UTC) 1670:20:00, 14 October 2014 (UTC) 1641:19:56, 14 October 2014 (UTC) 1620:19:18, 14 October 2014 (UTC) 1594:16:06, 14 October 2014 (UTC) 1559:18:49, 14 October 2014 (UTC) 1544:biography of a living person 1517:18:20, 14 October 2014 (UTC) 1478:15:53, 14 October 2014 (UTC) 1450:15:50, 14 October 2014 (UTC) 1426:08:55, 14 October 2014 (UTC) 1404:05:29, 14 October 2014 (UTC) 1364:23:27, 13 October 2014 (UTC) 1343:22:44, 13 October 2014 (UTC) 1326:21:49, 13 October 2014 (UTC) 1303:21:43, 13 October 2014 (UTC) 1286:19:52, 13 October 2014 (UTC) 1261:19:32, 13 October 2014 (UTC) 1232:18:31, 13 October 2014 (UTC) 1207:18:03, 13 October 2014 (UTC) 1181:19:23, 13 October 2014 (UTC) 1158:07:13, 12 October 2014 (UTC) 1124:11:09, 11 October 2014 (UTC) 1104:03:43, 11 October 2014 (UTC) 1063:21:02, 10 October 2014 (UTC) 1048:19:06, 10 October 2014 (UTC) 1022:18:20, 13 October 2014 (UTC) 1001:17:54, 13 October 2014 (UTC) 976:12:54, 12 October 2014 (UTC) 869:Reliable Sources Noticeboard 646:Patch.com as reliable source 524:01:35, 11 October 2014 (UTC) 307:WikiProject New York (state) 198:contribute to the discussion 1072:Ongoing Edits and Deletions 956:21:48, 26 August 2014 (UTC) 47:must be removed immediately 2062: 890:to see what happens next.— 639:02:15, 22 March 2011 (UTC) 604:02:48, 28 March 2011 (UTC) 572:17:05, 26 March 2011 (UTC) 481:project's importance scale 350:project's importance scale 538:(e.g., articles from the 474: 405: 365: 347: 334:New York (state) articles 276: 233: 158: 134: 703:No, patch.com is not a 368:WikiProject Long Island 299:New York (state) portal 152:Politics and Government 362: 230: 116:This article is rated 839:third opinion process 531:Conflict of Interest? 436:WikiProject Wisconsin 361: 229: 189:WikiProject Biography 80:This page is about a 577:"Concerned Citizen?" 1028:Edits by NYRAMBLERR 90:editing, talk-page 18:Talk:Charles Lavine 2001:Active politicians 1974:Community Tech bot 1877:Protection request 1377:voiced support for 461:Wisconsin articles 363: 231: 216:biography articles 122:content assessment 1963:CharlesLavine.jpg 1873: 1856:comment added by 1812: 1795:comment added by 1763: 1746:comment added by 1673: 1656:comment added by 1623: 1606:comment added by 1416:comment added by 1407: 1390:comment added by 1354:comment added by 1276:comment added by 1222:comment added by 1171:comment added by 1114:comment added by 1012:comment added by 919: 918: 873:three revert rule 812: 811: 680: 642: 625:comment added by 527: 510:comment added by 495: 494: 491: 490: 487: 486: 384: 383: 380: 379: 252: 251: 248: 247: 102: 101: 67: 66: 16:(Redirected from 2053: 1923: 1919: 1918: 1872: 1850: 1811: 1789: 1762: 1740: 1672: 1650: 1622: 1600: 1428: 1406: 1384: 1366: 1288: 1234: 1183: 1126: 1024: 909: 902: 901: 897: 821: 814: 813: 802: 792: 764: 754: 721: 711: 683: 682: 674: 667: 666: 662: 650: 641: 619: 526: 504: 463: 462: 459: 456: 453: 430: 428:Wisconsin portal 425: 424: 423: 414: 407: 406: 401: 393: 386: 336: 335: 332: 329: 326: 325:New York (state) 301: 296: 295: 294: 285: 278: 277: 272: 265:New York (state) 261: 254: 218: 217: 214: 211: 208: 194:join the project 183: 181:Biography portal 178: 177: 176: 167: 160: 159: 154: 143: 136: 119: 113: 112: 104: 76: 69: 55:this noticeboard 27: 21: 2061: 2060: 2056: 2055: 2054: 2052: 2051: 2050: 1986: 1985: 1970:nomination page 1956: 1924:and applied. -- 1916: 1914: 1879: 1851: 1818: 1790: 1741: 1679: 1651: 1601: 1571: 1536:actually called 1457: 1411: 1385: 1372: 1349: 1271: 1217: 1214: 1212:Criminal record 1189: 1187:Economic record 1166: 1109: 1074: 1030: 1007: 924: 922:Consistent NPOV 907: 899: 895: 893: 800: 790: 762: 752: 719: 709: 705:reliable source 672: 664: 660: 658: 648: 620: 612: 579: 533: 505: 500: 460: 457: 454: 451: 450: 426: 421: 419: 399: 333: 330: 327: 324: 323: 297: 292: 290: 267: 215: 212: 209: 206: 205: 179: 174: 172: 149: 120:on Knowledge's 117: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 2059: 2057: 2049: 2048: 2043: 2038: 2033: 2028: 2023: 2018: 2013: 2008: 2003: 1998: 1988: 1987: 1966: 1965: 1955: 1952: 1878: 1875: 1817: 1814: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1716: 1715: 1678: 1675: 1644: 1643: 1570: 1567: 1562: 1561: 1547: 1532: 1456: 1453: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1371: 1368: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1264: 1263: 1213: 1210: 1188: 1185: 1073: 1070: 1068: 1066: 1065: 1029: 1026: 1004: 990: 989: 988: 987: 980: 979: 923: 920: 917: 916: 879: 878: 854: 853: 827: 826: 810: 809: 808: 807: 770: 769: 727: 726: 647: 644: 611: 608: 578: 575: 540:New York Times 532: 529: 499: 496: 493: 492: 489: 488: 485: 484: 477:Low-importance 473: 467: 466: 464: 447:the discussion 432: 431: 415: 403: 402: 400:Low‑importance 394: 382: 381: 378: 377: 364: 354: 353: 346: 340: 339: 337: 320:the discussion 303: 302: 286: 274: 273: 262: 250: 249: 246: 245: 242:Low-importance 232: 222: 221: 219: 185: 184: 168: 156: 155: 144: 132: 131: 125: 114: 100: 99: 77: 65: 64: 60:this help page 44:poorly sourced 30: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2058: 2047: 2044: 2042: 2039: 2037: 2034: 2032: 2029: 2027: 2024: 2022: 2019: 2017: 2014: 2012: 2009: 2007: 2004: 2002: 1999: 1997: 1994: 1993: 1991: 1984: 1983: 1979: 1975: 1971: 1964: 1961: 1960: 1959: 1953: 1951: 1950: 1946: 1942: 1938: 1934: 1933:banjo playing 1931: 1927: 1922: 1912: 1911: 1907: 1903: 1899: 1895: 1894:banjo playing 1892: 1888: 1884: 1881:Request made 1876: 1874: 1871: 1867: 1863: 1859: 1855: 1847: 1846: 1842: 1838: 1834: 1830: 1829:banjo playing 1827: 1823: 1815: 1813: 1810: 1806: 1802: 1798: 1794: 1781: 1777: 1773: 1772:107.77.76.110 1768: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1761: 1757: 1753: 1749: 1745: 1732: 1728: 1724: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1714: 1710: 1706: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1694: 1690: 1686: 1683: 1676: 1674: 1671: 1667: 1663: 1659: 1655: 1649: 1642: 1638: 1634: 1630: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1621: 1617: 1613: 1609: 1605: 1596: 1595: 1591: 1587: 1582: 1580: 1575: 1566: 1560: 1556: 1552: 1548: 1545: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1530: 1525: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1514: 1510: 1505: 1504: 1500: 1499: 1496: 1495: 1491: 1490: 1487: 1484: 1480: 1479: 1475: 1471: 1467: 1464: 1460: 1454: 1452: 1451: 1447: 1443: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1427: 1423: 1419: 1418:108.41.126.32 1415: 1408: 1405: 1401: 1397: 1393: 1389: 1381: 1378: 1369: 1367: 1365: 1361: 1357: 1356:108.41.126.32 1353: 1345: 1344: 1340: 1336: 1335:107.72.162.96 1332: 1328: 1327: 1323: 1319: 1318:107.72.162.96 1315: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1287: 1283: 1279: 1278:108.41.126.32 1275: 1269: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1250: 1246: 1242: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1233: 1229: 1225: 1224:108.41.126.32 1221: 1211: 1209: 1208: 1204: 1200: 1199:107.72.162.96 1196: 1193: 1186: 1184: 1182: 1178: 1174: 1173:108.41.126.32 1170: 1163: 1160: 1159: 1155: 1151: 1150:107.72.164.55 1147: 1143: 1140: 1136: 1133: 1129: 1125: 1121: 1117: 1116:24.189.80.105 1113: 1106: 1105: 1101: 1097: 1093: 1089: 1085: 1081: 1078: 1071: 1069: 1064: 1060: 1056: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1045: 1041: 1037: 1034: 1027: 1025: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1014:108.41.126.32 1011: 1003: 1002: 998: 994: 993:107.72.162.96 984: 983: 982: 981: 977: 974: 969: 964: 960: 959: 958: 957: 953: 949: 944: 940: 937: 934: 931: 928: 921: 915: 914: 910: 904: 903: 889: 885: 881: 880: 877: 874: 870: 865: 864:Help:Contents 860: 856: 855: 851: 847: 843: 840: 836: 832: 829: 828: 824: 820: 816: 815: 806: 803: 798: 797: 793: 787: 786: 785: 783: 779: 775: 768: 765: 760: 759: 755: 749: 744: 743: 742: 740: 736: 732: 725: 722: 717: 716: 712: 706: 702: 701: 700: 698: 694: 690: 685: 684: 681: 679: 675: 669: 668: 654: 645: 643: 640: 636: 632: 628: 624: 616: 609: 607: 605: 601: 597: 593: 589: 583: 576: 574: 573: 569: 565: 561: 557: 553: 552:Verifiability 549: 545: 541: 537: 530: 528: 525: 521: 517: 513: 509: 497: 482: 478: 472: 469: 468: 465: 448: 444: 443: 438: 437: 429: 418: 416: 413: 409: 408: 404: 398: 395: 392: 388: 375: 374: 369: 360: 356: 355: 351: 345: 342: 341: 338: 321: 317: 313: 309: 308: 300: 289: 287: 284: 280: 279: 275: 271: 266: 263: 260: 256: 243: 240:(assessed as 239: 238: 228: 224: 223: 220: 203: 202:documentation 199: 195: 191: 190: 182: 171: 169: 166: 162: 161: 157: 153: 148: 145: 142: 138: 133: 129: 123: 115: 111: 106: 105: 97: 94:, and simple 93: 89: 85: 83: 78: 75: 71: 70: 62: 61: 56: 52: 48: 45: 41: 37: 36: 31: 29: 28: 19: 1967: 1957: 1928:- Just your 1920: 1913: 1889:- Just your 1880: 1852:— Preceding 1848: 1824:- Just your 1819: 1816:Edit warring 1791:— Preceding 1786: 1742:— Preceding 1737: 1687: 1684: 1680: 1652:— Preceding 1645: 1629:WP:SYNTHESIS 1602:— Preceding 1597: 1583: 1578: 1576: 1572: 1563: 1540:WP:SYNTHESIS 1535: 1524:edit warring 1506: 1501: 1497: 1492: 1481: 1468: 1466:Cut it out. 1465: 1461: 1458: 1440: 1412:— Preceding 1409: 1386:— Preceding 1382: 1376: 1373: 1350:— Preceding 1346: 1333: 1329: 1316: 1313: 1272:— Preceding 1265: 1218:— Preceding 1215: 1197: 1194: 1190: 1167:— Preceding 1164: 1161: 1148: 1144: 1141: 1137: 1134: 1130: 1110:— Preceding 1107: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1082: 1079: 1075: 1067: 1038: 1035: 1031: 1008:— Preceding 1005: 991: 946:Thoughts? -- 945: 941: 938: 935: 932: 929: 925: 892: 884:What's next: 883: 882: 858: 857: 831:Disclaimers: 830: 822: 795: 771: 757: 728: 714: 687: 657: 651:Copied from 649: 621:— Preceding 617: 613: 610:Obvious Bias 591: 584: 580: 560:Edit Warring 547: 543: 539: 535: 534: 506:— Preceding 501: 476: 440: 434: 371: 305: 235: 187: 128:WikiProjects 79: 58: 46: 39: 33: 1937:drag racing 1898:drag racing 1858:Samuelckas1 1833:drag racing 1797:Samuelckas1 1658:Samuelckas1 1646:Yes, here: 1608:Samuelckas1 784:Eyespy4you 741:Eyespy4you 699:Eyespy4you 627:20101234abc 606:Eyespy4you 270:Long Island 118:Start-class 1990:Categories 1926:Scalhotrod 1887:Scalhotrod 1822:Scalhotrod 1705:Ivanvector 1633:Ivanvector 1551:Ivanvector 1055:Dougweller 896:RANSPORTER 888:click here 774:Eyespy4you 731:Eyespy4you 689:Eyespy4you 661:RANSPORTER 596:Eyespy4you 564:Eyespy4you 544:Daily News 312:U.S. state 82:politician 1748:Asklovett 1723:NYRambler 1689:NYRambler 1586:NYRambler 1502:Reuters: 1470:NYRambler 1442:NYRambler 1435:fighting. 1392:NYRambler 1096:NYRambler 1040:NYRambler 973:Lankiveil 948:NYRambler 846:consensus 452:Wisconsin 442:Wisconsin 397:Wisconsin 207:Biography 147:Biography 96:vandalism 51:libellous 1866:contribs 1854:unsigned 1805:contribs 1793:unsigned 1756:contribs 1744:unsigned 1666:contribs 1654:unsigned 1616:contribs 1604:unsigned 1509:Radman23 1414:unsigned 1400:contribs 1388:unsigned 1352:unsigned 1274:unsigned 1249:WP:undue 1220:unsigned 1169:unsigned 1112:unsigned 1010:unsigned 859:Opinion: 635:contribs 623:unsigned 520:contribs 512:Radman23 508:unsigned 498:Untitled 373:inactive 316:New York 92:trolling 1930:average 1891:average 1826:average 1529:WP:NPOV 1268:WP:NPOV 1247:. It's 1245:WP:NPOV 968:WP:NPOV 548:Newsday 479:on the 1945:(Talk) 1941:cowboy 1906:(Talk) 1902:cowboy 1841:(Talk) 1837:cowboy 1295:Meters 1253:Meters 1241:WP:BLP 963:WP:BLP 748:source 546:, and 124:scale. 88:biased 1579:voted 1108:--- 842:(FAQ) 835:WP:3O 1978:talk 1947:☮ღ☺ 1943:... 1921:Done 1908:☮ღ☺ 1904:... 1862:talk 1843:☮ღ☺ 1839:... 1801:talk 1776:talk 1752:talk 1727:talk 1709:talk 1693:talk 1662:talk 1637:talk 1612:talk 1590:talk 1555:talk 1513:talk 1474:talk 1446:talk 1422:talk 1396:talk 1360:talk 1339:talk 1322:talk 1299:talk 1282:talk 1257:talk 1243:and 1228:talk 1203:talk 1177:talk 1154:talk 1142:--- 1120:talk 1100:talk 1080:--- 1059:talk 1044:talk 1018:talk 997:talk 952:talk 908:TALK 850:here 778:talk 735:talk 693:talk 673:TALK 631:talk 600:talk 568:talk 516:talk 196:and 1972:. — 1485:or 801:Man 763:Man 720:Man 562:." 471:Low 344:??? 314:of 40:BLP 1992:: 1980:) 1939:, 1935:, 1900:, 1896:, 1885:-- 1868:) 1864:• 1835:, 1831:, 1807:) 1803:• 1778:) 1758:) 1754:• 1729:) 1711:) 1695:) 1668:) 1664:• 1639:) 1618:) 1614:• 1592:) 1584:-- 1557:) 1515:) 1476:) 1448:) 1424:) 1402:) 1398:• 1362:) 1341:) 1324:) 1301:) 1284:) 1259:) 1230:) 1205:) 1179:) 1156:) 1122:) 1102:) 1061:) 1046:) 1020:) 999:) 954:) 911:) 900:AN 852:. 825:: 791:TN 780:) 753:TN 737:) 710:TN 695:) 676:) 665:AN 637:) 633:• 602:) 570:) 542:, 522:) 518:• 268:: 244:). 150:: 1976:( 1860:( 1799:( 1774:( 1750:( 1725:( 1707:( 1691:( 1660:( 1635:( 1610:( 1588:( 1553:( 1546:. 1511:( 1472:( 1444:( 1420:( 1394:( 1358:( 1337:( 1320:( 1297:( 1280:( 1255:( 1226:( 1201:( 1175:( 1152:( 1118:( 1098:( 1057:( 1042:( 1016:( 995:( 978:. 950:( 905:( 898:M 894:T 796:X 776:( 758:X 746:( 733:( 715:X 691:( 670:( 663:M 659:T 629:( 598:( 594:. 566:( 514:( 483:. 376:. 352:. 204:. 130:: 98:. 63:. 38:( 20:)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index