84:
436:
step is to normalize that, such that the 'forward'(z) and 'right'(x) basis vectors are aligned with the longitude and latitude lines respectively; this involves applying the
Rodrigues Axis-angle rotation from the quaternion page. From this aligned basis, an additional spin can be applied as a parameter to define the frame, resulting in (lat,long,spin) coordinates for the frame; reversing from axis-angle to this as been challenging, involving arccos and arcsin which results in a limited range of outputs.
74:
53:
22:
432:
directly as axis-angle never has this issue, since the (x,y,z) format is just the briefest notation, computationally, what is needed is the normal and angle, and rarely are the combined values used. An axis being defined as a unit vector can never be zero. The point at the origin results with no change, and is
Identity, (not a singularity?).
440:
Parameterization of extended (latitude, longitude, spin) can be accurately translated to axis-angle for a range of -2pi to 2pi on each parameter. The latitude 0 results in a direction vector that is 'up' perpendicular to the first pole, and the longitude defines how that will spin around that point,
424:
No stereographic projections... although, it's obvious that something mobial (or of a mobius) might be a good parameterization, as the points turn in space around a mobial path... but it's inobvious that it's probably a red herring since it's already in a natural form as X,Y,Z coordinates, which are
431:
The singularity at (0,0,0), when projected to rotations sort of has to be handled; it's technically possible that every axis of rotation is valid, but the change around that axis is 0 degrees, so there is no change anyway, so the direction really is free to be whatever you need it to be. Composing
420:
It's really a very direct representation of the projection of the rotations. Any point is just an axis and a length to determine the spin around that axis - like having a gyroscope centered at the origin, it's axle of rotation aimed along a line, and the angle, an amount of turn of the rotor, only
435:
Latitude and
Latitude are enough to specify a normal to a sphere, which will be called 'up', but does not define the orientation around that 'up'... naive calculations will of course result with An orientation, and it is deterministic, but it's not a good 'base'. Once the 'up' is found, the first
405:
Although that section is on a page of quaternions, it doesn't have a lot to do with quaternions, since the input parameters are immediately A-axis-angle and B-axis-angle, where the axis is a normalized direction vector indicating the axis of rotation, and the angle is the length-scalar of as a
441:
and is effectively the same as 'spin' on each pole. Other than where the gimbles are in a common direction some times, the full topology of the curve can be walked using axis-angle... this isn't a single-covering parameterization, but is able to completely cover the space at least once.
180:
Euler angles are z-y-z. Tait-Bryan (aka Cardan aka nautical) angles are x-y-z. These latter are often called "Euler angles", and somewhere mention of this confusion should be made, but it should not be presented as anything "correct" or "official".
444:
For purposes of expressing a direction, the two (latitude, longitude) coordinates can compactly identify this... it simply translates to `(lat*cos(long),0,lat*sin(long))`, or `lat, ( cos(long), 0, sin(long) )` in axis-angle form.
416:
I've been playing with (x,y,z) rotations for a while now, this demo shows the flat double-cover representation of the rotation space, which does not overlap itself when represented this way.
140:
395:
244:. The "proposal" is phrased as a question, which suggests that even the proposer is unsure of whether the merge is appropriate. Moreover, the destination article was never tagged.
348:
217:
428:
But, if I'm really the only person in the world to know this, I should really try showing everyone else they already had all the tools to put this together.
475:
130:
470:
198:
Another parametrization to list is to treat SO(3) as the manifold that it is -- real 3-dimensional projective space. This is elaborated on in
106:
97:
58:
421:
instead of the rotor moving all the points around it are translated... leaving all the points on the line itself untransformed.
294:(Not Euler Angles) is so much easier to convert to and from rotation matricii and Quaternions; and this is entirely ommited.
281:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
33:
353:
291:
195:
the orthogonal matrices, so the previous version was just a complicated way of saying SO(3) parameterizes SO(3).
21:
410:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Rotation_formalisms_in_three_dimensions#Rodriguez_Rotation_(Rotation_Composition)
268:
39:
83:
303:
249:
409:
105:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
89:
456:
73:
52:
401:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Quaternions_and_spatial_rotation#The_composition_of_spatial_rotations
207:
417:
264:
169:
191:
The skew-symmetric matrices themselves form a chart near the identity. Their exponentials
452:
245:
400:
464:
203:
406:
separate term; this doesn't change that it's really a 3D value into a 4D value.
165:
102:
397:
and used as Euler Axis with
Rodrigues' Rotation Formula applied to axis-angle.
263:
Should it be merged to here as a special case without a particular notability?
448:
79:
272:
253:
211:
173:
425:
coincidentally in the same X/Y/Z direction as linear transformations.
199:
15:
297:
There should be a section on 'Successes in parameterization'
418:
https://d3x0r.github.io/STFRPhysics/3d/indexSphereMap.html
356:
306:
233:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
188:. The reference should go in the C.r.p., not here.
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
389:
342:
218:Conversion between quaternions and Euler angles
236:A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
8:
390:{\displaystyle (x\theta ,y\theta ,z\theta )}
19:
47:
355:
305:
184:Cayley rational parameters are in Weyl
164:Section header added. —Nils von Barth (
49:
285:
7:
412:This version is closer to accurate.
227:The following discussion is closed.
95:This article is within the scope of
290:It's all really so much simpler in
200:https://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.4661.pdf
38:It is of interest to the following
240:The result of this discussion was
14:
476:Low-priority mathematics articles
343:{\displaystyle (\theta ,(x,y,z))}
115:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics
471:Start-Class mathematics articles
277:The discussion above is closed.
118:Template:WikiProject Mathematics
82:
72:
51:
20:
135:This article has been rated as
384:
357:
337:
334:
316:
307:
1:
212:06:21, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
109:and see a list of open tasks.
273:16:18, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
254:17:22, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
492:
286:It's all so wrong (EditMe)
457:05:11, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
174:21:13, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
134:
67:
46:
279:Please do not modify it.
230:Please do not modify it.
141:project's priority scale
98:WikiProject Mathematics
391:
344:
28:This article is rated
392:
345:
354:
304:
186:The Classical Groups
121:mathematics articles
387:
340:
90:Mathematics portal
34:content assessment
176:
155:
154:
151:
150:
147:
146:
483:
396:
394:
393:
388:
349:
347:
346:
341:
232:
163:
123:
122:
119:
116:
113:
92:
87:
86:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
491:
490:
486:
485:
484:
482:
481:
480:
461:
460:
352:
351:
302:
301:
288:
283:
282:
261:
228:
221:
160:
120:
117:
114:
111:
110:
88:
81:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
489:
487:
479:
478:
473:
463:
462:
439:
415:
386:
383:
380:
377:
374:
371:
368:
365:
362:
359:
339:
336:
333:
330:
327:
324:
321:
318:
315:
312:
309:
287:
284:
276:
260:
259:
258:
257:
256:
223:
222:
220:
215:
178:
177:
159:
156:
153:
152:
149:
148:
145:
144:
133:
127:
126:
124:
107:the discussion
94:
93:
77:
65:
64:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
488:
477:
474:
472:
469:
468:
466:
459:
458:
454:
450:
446:
442:
437:
433:
429:
426:
422:
419:
413:
411:
407:
403:
402:
398:
381:
378:
375:
372:
369:
366:
363:
360:
331:
328:
325:
322:
319:
313:
310:
298:
295:
293:
280:
275:
274:
270:
266:
255:
251:
247:
243:
239:
238:
237:
234:
231:
225:
224:
219:
216:
214:
213:
209:
205:
201:
196:
194:
189:
187:
182:
175:
171:
167:
162:
161:
157:
142:
138:
132:
129:
128:
125:
108:
104:
100:
99:
91:
85:
80:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
447:
443:
438:
434:
430:
427:
423:
414:
408:
404:
399:
350:combined to
299:
296:
289:
278:
262:
242:No Consensus
241:
235:
229:
226:
197:
192:
190:
185:
183:
179:
137:Low-priority
136:
96:
62:Low‑priority
40:WikiProjects
300:Axis-Angle
265:Incnis Mrsi
158:Suggestions
112:Mathematics
103:mathematics
59:Mathematics
30:Start-class
465:Categories
292:Euler Axis
246:NukeofEarl
204:Normvcr
139:on the
166:nbarth
36:scale.
449:D3x0r
453:talk
269:talk
250:talk
208:talk
170:talk
193:are
168:) (
131:Low
467::
455:)
382:θ
373:θ
364:θ
311:θ
271:)
252:)
210:)
202:.
172:)
451:(
385:)
379:z
376:,
370:y
367:,
361:x
358:(
338:)
335:)
332:z
329:,
326:y
323:,
320:x
317:(
314:,
308:(
267:(
248:(
206:(
143:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
