Knowledge

Talk:Chinese nationality law/GA1

Source 📝

659: 634: 601: 548: 525: 504: 483: 446: 425: 395: 374: 315: 292: 42: 690:
I'm not a huge fan of the current headings layout. The headings appear a little bit repetitive, with the constant trichotomy of Mainland China, Hong Kong & Macau, and Taiwan. While there's obviously a good reason for breaking it down this way, stylistically it could use a little bit of
307:
This article evidently meets all spelling/gramar requirements. The prose is also sufficiently clear and concise. The only aspect of this article which I think could use some improvement (but which is not required at the GA level) would be reducing the repetition of the section heads.
237:
I look forward to conducting the full review for this article and working with the article's contributors on any improvements which might be needed to bring it to GA level. I anticipate a speedy confirmation process. --
685:
I'd like to start by saying congratulations! Bringing an article to GA level is a lot of work, and I commend your accomplishment. If you intend to pursue further elevation, these are some areas you could focus on:
415:, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). 47: 412: 719:
To your comment on the section headings, I also wasn't really sure how to name them and I agree it's a bit awkward as it is now. Will change if I think of something different.
189:
a long way from meeting any of the six good article criteria. If the article isn't already there (and my full review might very well reveal that it is), it's certainly close.
301: 126: 340: 80: 122: 418:
This article is especially well-sourced. The level of sourcing I see here is more akin to something I'd expect to see at the FA level. I'm very impressed.
70: 52: 107: 674:
Great work! I'll add a little more discussion in my closing statement, including possible avenues for future improvement, before I finalize my decision.
618: 177:
check and found nothing precluding a full review. As such, I'll begin the process of a full review soon. You can refer to my findings from the initial
344: 336: 99: 328: 647: 465:
I conducted the standard copyvio check and nothing stood out to me. As such, I've concluded that there is no copyvio or plagiarism.
332: 535: 269: 75: 455: 434: 156: 610: 115: 17: 622: 404: 196:
contain any copyright violations. I've conducted a copyvio check and found nothing warranting further examination.
716:
Thanks for reviewing! Could you manually add the GA template to the article itself? Seems Legobot is broken again.
408: 324: 614: 513: 359: 92: 561: 492: 567:
As I mentioned in my initial inspection, there is no indication of any edit-warring on this article.
459: 724: 173:
Hi, I'll be beginning the process of reviewing this article fully soon. I've conducted my initial
746: 643: 251: 150: 382:. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with 587: 583: 223: 178: 174: 591: 539:: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. 748: 728: 253: 160: 720: 383: 739: 734: 711: 244: 239: 146: 695:
But, regardless of what you decide to do moving forward, great work on this!
512:. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see 217:
prior GA review which presents any issues which have been left unresolved.
560:: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing 350:
Same advice as above, but once again, not yet necessary at this stage.
691:
improvement before it would meet, for instance, FA standards.
733:
Added the topicon and sounds good. Congrats again! --
134: 103: 302:understandable to an appropriately broad audience 210:any edit-warring taking place on this article. 8: 30: 262: 61: 33: 7: 304:; spelling and grammar are correct. 300:. the prose is clear, concise, and 24: 657: 632: 599: 546: 523: 502: 481: 444: 423: 393: 372: 313: 290: 203:in need of any cleanup banners. 749:17:06, 14 September 2020 (UTC) 729:02:28, 14 September 2020 (UTC) 413:could reasonably be challenged 254:20:56, 10 September 2020 (UTC) 161:20:56, 10 September 2020 (UTC) 1: 619:valid non-free use rationales 658: 633: 600: 547: 524: 503: 482: 445: 424: 394: 373: 314: 291: 18:Talk:Chinese nationality law 769: 384:the layout style guideline 571: 469: 354: 278: 268: 265: 646:to the topic, and have 323:. it complies with the 185:The article is clearly 474:Broad in its coverage 564:or content dispute. 456:copyright violations 435:no original research 365:no original research 491:. it addresses the 411:. All content that 226:preliminary review: 669:Overall assessment 615:copyright statuses 578:, if possible, by 345:list incorporation 681:Closing statement 678: 677: 648:suitable captions 621:are provided for 454:. it contains no 192:The article does 181:inspection here: 169:Opening statement 89: 88: 760: 744: 715: 700: 661: 660: 636: 635: 623:non-free content 603: 602: 550: 549: 527: 526: 506: 505: 485: 484: 448: 447: 427: 426: 405:reliable sources 397: 396: 376: 375: 317: 316: 294: 293: 263: 249: 231: 139: 130: 111: 43:Copyvio detector 31: 768: 767: 763: 762: 761: 759: 758: 757: 740: 709: 698: 683: 327:guidelines for 325:Manual of Style 274:Review Comment 261: 245: 229: 213:There has been 199:The article is 171: 120: 97: 91: 85: 57: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 766: 764: 756: 755: 754: 753: 752: 751: 717: 693: 692: 682: 679: 676: 675: 672: 662: 654: 653: 651: 637: 629: 628: 626: 604: 596: 595: 569: 568: 565: 551: 543: 542: 540: 528: 520: 519: 517: 507: 499: 498: 496: 495:of the topic. 486: 478: 477: 467: 466: 463: 449: 441: 440: 438: 433:. it contains 428: 420: 419: 416: 398: 390: 389: 387: 377: 369: 368: 352: 351: 348: 337:words to watch 318: 310: 309: 305: 295: 287: 286: 276: 275: 272: 267: 260: 257: 219: 218: 211: 204: 197: 190: 170: 167: 165: 140: 87: 86: 84: 83: 78: 73: 67: 64: 63: 59: 58: 56: 55: 53:External links 50: 45: 39: 36: 35: 28: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 765: 750: 747: 745: 743: 738: 737: 732: 731: 730: 726: 722: 718: 713: 708: 707: 706: 705: 704: 703: 696: 689: 688: 687: 680: 673: 670: 666: 663: 656: 655: 652: 649: 645: 641: 638: 631: 630: 627: 624: 620: 616: 612: 608: 605: 598: 597: 593: 589: 585: 581: 577: 574: 570: 566: 563: 559: 555: 552: 545: 544: 541: 538: 537: 532: 529: 522: 521: 518: 515: 514:summary style 511: 508: 501: 500: 497: 494: 490: 487: 480: 479: 475: 472: 468: 464: 461: 457: 453: 450: 443: 442: 439: 436: 432: 429: 422: 421: 417: 414: 410: 406: 402: 399: 392: 391: 388: 385: 381: 378: 371: 370: 366: 362: 361: 357: 353: 349: 346: 342: 338: 334: 330: 329:lead sections 326: 322: 319: 312: 311: 306: 303: 299: 296: 289: 288: 284: 281: 277: 273: 271: 264: 258: 256: 255: 252: 250: 248: 243: 242: 235: 234: 228: 227: 225: 216: 212: 209: 205: 202: 198: 195: 191: 188: 184: 183: 182: 180: 176: 168: 166: 163: 162: 158: 155: 152: 148: 145: 141: 138: 137: 133: 128: 124: 119: 118: 114: 109: 105: 101: 96: 95: 82: 79: 77: 74: 72: 69: 68: 66: 65: 60: 54: 51: 49: 46: 44: 41: 40: 38: 37: 32: 26: 19: 741: 735: 701: 697: 694: 684: 668: 664: 642:. media are 639: 609:. media are 606: 579: 575: 572: 557: 553: 534: 530: 509: 493:main aspects 488: 473: 470: 451: 430: 409:cited inline 400: 379: 364: 358: 355: 320: 297: 283:Well-written 282: 279: 246: 240: 236: 232: 222: 221: 220: 214: 207: 200: 193: 186: 172: 164: 153: 143: 142: 135: 131: 117:Article talk 116: 112: 93: 90: 81:Instructions 613:with their 576:Illustrated 259:Full review 104:visual edit 460:plagiarism 360:Verifiable 48:Authorship 34:GA toolbox 721:Horserice 270:Attribute 224:WP:GAFAIL 206:There is 179:WP:GAFAIL 175:WP:GAFAIL 144:Reviewer: 71:Templates 62:Reviewing 27:GA Review 712:Ex Parte 644:relevant 582:such as 562:edit war 157:contribs 147:Ex Parte 76:Criteria 536:Neutral 341:fiction 127:history 108:history 94:Article 617:, and 611:tagged 584:images 558:Stable 343:, and 333:layout 742:Parte 592:audio 590:, or 588:video 580:media 363:with 266:Rate 247:Parte 136:Watch 16:< 725:talk 702:Pass 407:are 233:Pass 151:talk 123:edit 100:edit 516:). 458:or 208:not 201:not 194:not 187:not 736:Ex 727:) 671:. 667:. 650:. 640:6b 625:. 607:6a 594:: 586:, 573:6. 556:. 533:. 510:3b 489:3a 476:: 471:3. 462:. 452:2d 437:. 431:2c 403:. 401:2b 386:. 380:2a 367:: 356:2. 347:. 339:, 335:, 331:, 321:1b 298:1a 285:: 280:1. 241:Ex 215:no 159:) 125:| 106:| 102:| 723:( 714:: 710:@ 699:✓ 665:7 554:5 531:4 230:✓ 154:· 149:( 132:· 129:) 121:( 113:· 110:) 98:(

Index

Talk:Chinese nationality law
Copyvio detector
Authorship
External links
Templates
Criteria
Instructions
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
Ex Parte
talk
contribs
20:56, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
WP:GAFAIL
WP:GAFAIL
WP:GAFAIL
Ex
Parte

20:56, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Attribute
understandable to an appropriately broad audience
Manual of Style
lead sections

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.